Patterns of Pediatric Facial Fractures

2021 ◽  
pp. 194338752199173
Author(s):  
Kevin Hong ◽  
James Jeong ◽  
Yehudah N. Susson ◽  
Shelly Abramowicz

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess patterns of maxillofacial trauma in the pediatric population in Atlanta. This information is important to help guide management and allocate resources for treatment of maxillofacial injuries at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA). Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review of children who presented from 2006 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age 18 years old or younger, (2) presentation to emergency department, (3) diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures, and (4) evaluation by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Otolaryngology, or Plastic Surgery services. Medical records were reviewed to record demographic, mechanism of injury, fracture location, and yearly incidence of injury. Descriptive statistics were computed to summarize findings and overall trends. Results: During the study period, 39,833 patients were identified. Of them, 1995 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were male (n = 1359, 68%) with an average age of 9.4 years old (range of 1 month to 18 years old). Mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle collisions (MVC) (n = 597, 29.9%), fall (n = 565, 28.3%), sports injury (n = 317, 15.9%), pedestrian struck (n = 215, 10.8%), assault/abuse (n = 204, 10.2%), other (n = 81, 4.1%), or gunshot wound (n = 16, 0.8%). Fracture sites were mandible (n = 519, 26%), complex (n = 479, 24%), nasal (n = 419, 21%), dentoalveolar (n = 279, 14%), orbital (n = 259, 13%), and maxilla (n = 40, 2%). Males had a higher incidence of assault than females (n = 185, 91% of assaults). The incidence of maxillofacial trauma increased with age with a peak incidence in 13 to 16-year-olds (n = 566, 28.3%). During the years examined, there was an upward trend in MVCs as the etiology with a peak incidence of facial fractures due to MVCs occurring in 2015. All other mechanisms remained constant during this time period. Conclusions: There was an increase in pediatric facial fractures secondary to motor vehicle collisions from 2007 to 2015 despite improvements in regulations, traffic safety, and technology.

2021 ◽  
pp. 81-83
Author(s):  
Sharmila. S ◽  
Abhilash Balakrishnan ◽  
Saji Nair .A ◽  
Ajith Kumar.K

PURPOSE OFTHE STUDY: To estimate the proportion and types of ophthalmic injuries in patients with maxillofacial fractures PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with maxillofacial trauma, who came to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery Government Dental college Thiruvananthapuram from November 2020 to June 2021were included in this study. The information and data collected included age, sex, mechanism of injury, type of maxillofacial fracture and type of ophthalmic injury. RESULTS: Ocular injury was sustained by 209 patients out of which 180 (86.1%) were males and 29(13.9%)were females. The largest age group of patients associated with ophthalmic injuries were 30-39 years. The etiology of facial fractures or ocular injuries showed that road trafc accidents more frequently resulted in ocular injuries 66.5% followed by assault 18.7% and self fall 14.8%. Ophthalmic injuries occurred mostly in association with orbital fractures 33.5% followed by Zygomatico maxillary complex fracture 26.8%and Maxillary sinus fractures 24.4%. Periorbital oedema was the most common ophthalmic injury accounting for 46.4%of cases followed by Periorbital ecchymosis 35.4% and Subconjuntival haemorrhage 17.2%. CONCLUSION: Mid facial trauma commonly causes ophthalmic injuries of varying degrees. Prompt ophthalmic examination of all patients with mid facial trauma is mandatory to prevent any blinding complications


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiko Yamamoto ◽  
Yumiko Matsusue ◽  
Satoshi Horita ◽  
Kazuhiro Murakami ◽  
Yoshihiro Ueyama ◽  
...  

Maxillofacial fractures of pedestrians injured in a motor vehicle accident were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were 38 males and 26 females, and their age was distributed almost evenly from 1 to 91 years old (average 45.9 ± 24.8 years old). Motor vehicle collisions were with an automobile in 46 patients (71.9%), a motorcycle in 17 (26.6%), and a train in 1 (1.6%). The midface was involved in 32 patients (50.0%), the mandible in 19 (29.7%), and both the mandible and the midface in 13 (20.3%). Fractures were frequently observed in the zygoma and alveolus in the midface and in the condyle, symphysis, and body in the mandible. The facial injury severity scale (FISS) rating ranged from 1 to 9 (average 2.30 ± 1.79). Injuries to other sites of the body occurred in 29 patients (45.3%). Observation was most frequently chosen in 26 patients (40.6%), followed by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in 18 (28.1%), and maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) in 8 (12.5%). The FISS rating was higher in patients treated with ORIF and MMF. Injuries to other sites of the body were observed at a higher rate in patients who collided with an automobile and were also treated by ORIF.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 527-530
Author(s):  
José Jhenikártery Maia de Oliveira ◽  
Micaella Fernandes Farias ◽  
Flaviana Laís Pereira dos Santos ◽  
Artemisa Fernanda Moura Ferreira ◽  
Lucas Alexandre de Morais Santos

Introdução: Fraturas no complexo zigomático orbital podem resultar em deslocamento ósseo com alteração do volume orbital e distúrbios funcionais. As complicações associadas aos traumas dessa região podem vir a interferir diretamente na qualidade de vida do indivíduo, dessa forma, faz-se necessário a cirurgia de reposicionamento anatômico do osso. Objetivo: Relatar um caso clínico de fratura do complexo zigomático orbital em paciente vítima de acidente desportivo. Relato de caso: Paciente do sexo masculino, leucoderma, vítima de acidente desportivo, compareceu a um serviço de Cirurgia Bucomaxilofacial da cidade de Recife-PE, apresentando alterações anatômicas visíveis na região zigomática do lado esquerdo da face. Ao exame clínico observou-se assimetria facial, edema, equimose periorbital, hemorragia subconjuntival, perda de volume do lado afetado e desconforto relado pelo paciente, sugerindo fratura do complexo zigomático orbital. A Tomografia Computadorizada mostrou perda da projeção anteroposterior do corpo do osso zigomático esquerdo, com fratura no arco zigomático e descontinuidade da sutura esfenozigomática esquerdas. O corte tomográfico coronal evidenciou aprisionamento do conteúdo orbital por fragmentos presentes no assoalho da órbita, e fratura do pilar zigomático-maxilar. Através de acessos cirúrgicos peri-orbitais (superciliar e subtarsal) foi instalada 1 mini-placa com parafusos (1 em cada acesso), nas regiões da sutura fronto-zigomática e da margem infraorbital. Pelo acesso intraoral foi fixada uma placa no pilar zigomático-maxilar. O tratamento cirúrgico buscou acesso ao esqueleto da órbita, redução anatômica e fixação interna estável com mini-placas e parafusos. Considerações finais: Após 10 dias, observou-se o restabelecimento anatômico da projeção anteroposterior do osso zigomático direto, procedendo à melhora estético-funcional. Descritores: Anatomia Regional; Traumatologia; Fraturas Orbitárias. Referências Obimakinde OS, Ogundipe KO, Rabiu TB, Okoje VN. Maxillofacial fractures in a budding teaching hospital: a study of pattern of presentation and care. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;26:218. Ugboko V, Udoye C, Ndukwe K, Amole A, Aregbesola S. Zygomatic complex fractures in a suburban Nigerian population. Dent Traumatol. 2005;21(2):70-5.  Zamboni RA, Wagner JCB, Volkweis MR, Gerhardt EL, Buchmann EM, Bavaresco CS. Epidemiological study of facial fractures at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service, Santa Casa de Misericordia Hospital Complex, Porto Alegre - RS - Brazil. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2017;44(5):491-97. Ramos JC, Almeida MLD, Alencar YCG, de Sousa Filho LF, Figueiredo CHMC, Almeida MSC. Estudo epidemiológico do trauma bucomaxilofacial em um hospital de referência da Paraíba. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2018;45(6):e1978. Wulkan M, Parreira Junior JG, Botter DA. Epidemiologia do trauma facial. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2005;51(5):290-95. Knight JS, North JF. The classification of malar fractures: an analysis of displacement as a guide to treatment. Br J Plast Su1961;13:325-39. Mendonça JCG, Crivelli DMB. Tratamento de fratura cominutiva do complexo zigomático orbitário com utilização de fio de aço: relato de caso. Rev Bras Cir Cabeça Pescoço. 2012; 41(2):93-5. Hupp JR, Tucker MR, Ellis E.Cirurgia oral e maxilofacial contemporânea. 6. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2015. p. 1099-1113. Oliva MA. Acesso subciliar para fraturas do complexozigomático-orbitári. Rev Bras Cir Cabeça Pescoço. 2013;42(2):106-8. Soares LP, Gaião L, Santos MESM, Pozza DH, Oliveira MG. Indicações da Tomografia Computadorizada no Diagnóstico das Fraturas Nasoórbito-etmoidais. Rev de Clin Pesq Odontol. 2004;1(1):29-33. Kurita M, Okazaki M, Ozaki M, Tanaka Y, Tsuji N, Takushima A, et al. Patient satisfaction after open reduction and internal fixation of zygomatic bone fractures. J Craniofac Surg .2010;21(7):45–9. Hammer B. Fraturas orbitárias: Diagnóstico, tratamento cirúrgico, correções secundárias. São Paulo: Santos; 2005. Panarello F, Chaves Júnior AC, Leles JLR, Oliveira MG. Análise dos materiais empregados para a reconstrução das fraturas orbitárias – Revisão de literatura. RBC: Rev Int Cir Traumatol Bucomaxilofacial. 2005;3(9):57-64. Kloss FR, Stigler RG, Brandstätter A, Tuli T, Rasse M, Laimer K, Hächl OL, Gassner R. Complications related to midfacial fractures: operative versus non-surgical treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(1):33-7. Liedtke FS, Richinho KP, Pisanelli CH, Araf D. Fraturas do soalho da órbita do tipo ‘’Blow-out”: revisão de literatura. Revicience 2005;5(5):8-11.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 455-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Hyman ◽  
Sandeep Saha ◽  
Harry S. Nayar ◽  
John F. Doyle ◽  
Suresh K. Agarwal ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Brian T. McMullin ◽  
John S. Rhee ◽  
Frank A. Pintar ◽  
Aniko Szabo ◽  
Narayan Yoganandan

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 491-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Andrighetti Zamboni ◽  
João Carlos Birnfeld Wagner ◽  
Maurício Roth Volkweis ◽  
Eduardo Luis Gerhardt ◽  
Elissa Muller Buchmann ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives: to investigate the incidence and etiology of face trauma with diagnosis of facial fracture treated at the Buccomaxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology Service of the Santa Casa de Misericórdia Hospital Complex in Porto Alegre. Methods: we conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective epidemiological study of 134 trauma victims with 153 facial fractures. Results: the male gender was the most affected (86.6%) and the incidence was higher in the age group from 21 to 30 years. The main etiology was assault (38.8%), followed by motor vehicle accidents (14.2%), motorcycle accidents (13.4%), falls (9%), road accidents (6.7%), sports accidents (5.2%), work accidents (5.2%), firearm injuries (4.5%) and cycling accidents (3%). The most frequent fractures were those of the zygomatic complex (44.5%), followed by fractures of the mandible (42.5%), maxillary bone (5.2%), nasal bones (4.5%) and zygomatic arch (3.3%). Conclusion: the fractures of the zygomatic complex and the mandible were the ones with the highest incidence in the facial traumas, having physical assaults as their main cause.


2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-170
Author(s):  
Brian T. McMullin ◽  
John S. Rhee ◽  
Frank A. Pintar ◽  
Aniko Szabo ◽  
Narayan Yoganandan

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-7
Author(s):  
Charles N. Brooks ◽  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract Multiple factors determine the likelihood, type, and severity of bodily injury following a motor vehicle collision and, in turn, influence the need for treatment, extent of disability, and likelihood of permanent impairment. Among the most important factors is the change in velocity due to an impact (Δv). Other factors include the individual's strength and elasticity, body position at the time of impact, awareness of the impending impact (ie, opportunity to brace, guard, or contract muscles before an impact), and effects of braking. Because Δv is the area under the acceleration vs time curve, it combines force and duration and is a useful way to quantify impact severity. The article includes a table showing the results of a literature review that concluded, “the consensus of human subject research conducted to date is that a single exposure to a rear-end impact with a Δv of 5 mph or less is unlikely to result in injury” in most healthy, restrained occupants. Because velocity incorporates direction as well as speed, a vehicular occupant is less likely to be injured in a rear impact than when struck from the side. Evaluators must consider multiple factors, including the occupant's pre-existing physical and psychosocial status, the mechanism and magnitude of the collision, and a variety of biomechanical variables. Recommendations based solely on patient history and physical findings (and, perhaps, imaging studies) may be ill-informed.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
James K. Kuan ◽  
Robert Kaufman ◽  
Jonathan L. Wright ◽  
Charles Mock ◽  
Avery B. Nathens ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document