scholarly journals Epidemiological study of facial fractures at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service, Santa Casa de Misericordia Hospital Complex, Porto Alegre - RS - Brazil

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 491-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Andrighetti Zamboni ◽  
João Carlos Birnfeld Wagner ◽  
Maurício Roth Volkweis ◽  
Eduardo Luis Gerhardt ◽  
Elissa Muller Buchmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epidemiological Study ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Facial Fractures ◽  
Porto Alegre ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Vehicle Accidents ◽  
Firearm Injuries ◽  
Motorcycle Accidents

ABSTRACT Objectives: to investigate the incidence and etiology of face trauma with diagnosis of facial fracture treated at the Buccomaxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology Service of the Santa Casa de Misericórdia Hospital Complex in Porto Alegre. Methods: we conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective epidemiological study of 134 trauma victims with 153 facial fractures. Results: the male gender was the most affected (86.6%) and the incidence was higher in the age group from 21 to 30 years. The main etiology was assault (38.8%), followed by motor vehicle accidents (14.2%), motorcycle accidents (13.4%), falls (9%), road accidents (6.7%), sports accidents (5.2%), work accidents (5.2%), firearm injuries (4.5%) and cycling accidents (3%). The most frequent fractures were those of the zygomatic complex (44.5%), followed by fractures of the mandible (42.5%), maxillary bone (5.2%), nasal bones (4.5%) and zygomatic arch (3.3%). Conclusion: the fractures of the zygomatic complex and the mandible were the ones with the highest incidence in the facial traumas, having physical assaults as their main cause.

Patterns of Pediatric Facial Fractures

2021 ◽  
pp. 194338752199173
Author(s):  
Kevin Hong ◽  
James Jeong ◽  
Yehudah N. Susson ◽  
Shelly Abramowicz
Keyword(s):  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Maxillofacial Trauma ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Facial Fractures ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Motor Vehicle Collisions ◽  
Vehicle Collisions ◽  
Peak Incidence ◽  
Maxillofacial Fractures

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess patterns of maxillofacial trauma in the pediatric population in Atlanta. This information is important to help guide management and allocate resources for treatment of maxillofacial injuries at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA). Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review of children who presented from 2006 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age 18 years old or younger, (2) presentation to emergency department, (3) diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures, and (4) evaluation by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Otolaryngology, or Plastic Surgery services. Medical records were reviewed to record demographic, mechanism of injury, fracture location, and yearly incidence of injury. Descriptive statistics were computed to summarize findings and overall trends. Results: During the study period, 39,833 patients were identified. Of them, 1995 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were male (n = 1359, 68%) with an average age of 9.4 years old (range of 1 month to 18 years old). Mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle collisions (MVC) (n = 597, 29.9%), fall (n = 565, 28.3%), sports injury (n = 317, 15.9%), pedestrian struck (n = 215, 10.8%), assault/abuse (n = 204, 10.2%), other (n = 81, 4.1%), or gunshot wound (n = 16, 0.8%). Fracture sites were mandible (n = 519, 26%), complex (n = 479, 24%), nasal (n = 419, 21%), dentoalveolar (n = 279, 14%), orbital (n = 259, 13%), and maxilla (n = 40, 2%). Males had a higher incidence of assault than females (n = 185, 91% of assaults). The incidence of maxillofacial trauma increased with age with a peak incidence in 13 to 16-year-olds (n = 566, 28.3%). During the years examined, there was an upward trend in MVCs as the etiology with a peak incidence of facial fractures due to MVCs occurring in 2015. All other mechanisms remained constant during this time period. Conclusions: There was an increase in pediatric facial fractures secondary to motor vehicle collisions from 2007 to 2015 despite improvements in regulations, traffic safety, and technology.

scholarly journals Tratamento cirúrgico de fratura do complexo zigomatico orbital em paciente vítima de acidente desportivo: relato de caso

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 527-530
Author(s):  
José Jhenikártery Maia de Oliveira ◽  
Micaella Fernandes Farias ◽  
Flaviana Laís Pereira dos Santos ◽  
Artemisa Fernanda Moura Ferreira ◽  
Lucas Alexandre de Morais Santos
Keyword(s):  
Bone Fractures ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Facial Fractures ◽  
Porto Alegre ◽  
Maxillofacial Fractures ◽  
Facial Edema ◽  
Nigerian Population ◽  
Non Surgical Treatment

Introdução: Fraturas no complexo zigomático orbital podem resultar em deslocamento ósseo com alteração do volume orbital e distúrbios funcionais. As complicações associadas aos traumas dessa região podem vir a interferir diretamente na qualidade de vida do indivíduo, dessa forma, faz-se necessário a cirurgia de reposicionamento anatômico do osso. Objetivo: Relatar um caso clínico de fratura do complexo zigomático orbital em paciente vítima de acidente desportivo. Relato de caso: Paciente do sexo masculino, leucoderma, vítima de acidente desportivo, compareceu a um serviço de Cirurgia Bucomaxilofacial da cidade de Recife-PE, apresentando alterações anatômicas visíveis na região zigomática do lado esquerdo da face. Ao exame clínico observou-se assimetria facial, edema, equimose periorbital, hemorragia subconjuntival, perda de volume do lado afetado e desconforto relado pelo paciente, sugerindo fratura do complexo zigomático orbital. A Tomografia Computadorizada mostrou perda da projeção anteroposterior do corpo do osso zigomático esquerdo, com fratura no arco zigomático e descontinuidade da sutura esfenozigomática esquerdas. O corte tomográfico coronal evidenciou aprisionamento do conteúdo orbital por fragmentos presentes no assoalho da órbita, e fratura do pilar zigomático-maxilar. Através de acessos cirúrgicos peri-orbitais (superciliar e subtarsal) foi instalada 1 mini-placa com parafusos (1 em cada acesso), nas regiões da sutura fronto-zigomática e da margem infraorbital. Pelo acesso intraoral foi fixada uma placa no pilar zigomático-maxilar. O tratamento cirúrgico buscou acesso ao esqueleto da órbita, redução anatômica e fixação interna estável com mini-placas e parafusos. Considerações finais: Após 10 dias, observou-se o restabelecimento anatômico da projeção anteroposterior do osso zigomático direto, procedendo à melhora estético-funcional. Descritores: Anatomia Regional; Traumatologia; Fraturas Orbitárias. Referências Obimakinde OS, Ogundipe KO, Rabiu TB, Okoje VN. Maxillofacial fractures in a budding teaching hospital: a study of pattern of presentation and care. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;26:218. Ugboko V, Udoye C, Ndukwe K, Amole A, Aregbesola S. Zygomatic complex fractures in a suburban Nigerian population. Dent Traumatol. 2005;21(2):70-5.  Zamboni RA, Wagner JCB, Volkweis MR, Gerhardt EL, Buchmann EM, Bavaresco CS. Epidemiological study of facial fractures at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service, Santa Casa de Misericordia Hospital Complex, Porto Alegre - RS - Brazil. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2017;44(5):491-97. Ramos JC, Almeida MLD, Alencar YCG, de Sousa Filho LF, Figueiredo CHMC, Almeida MSC. Estudo epidemiológico do trauma bucomaxilofacial em um hospital de referência da Paraíba. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2018;45(6):e1978. Wulkan M, Parreira Junior JG, Botter DA. Epidemiologia do trauma facial. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2005;51(5):290-95. Knight JS, North JF. The classification of malar fractures: an analysis of displacement as a guide to treatment. Br J Plast Su1961;13:325-39. Mendonça JCG, Crivelli DMB. Tratamento de fratura cominutiva do complexo zigomático orbitário com utilização de fio de aço: relato de caso. Rev Bras Cir Cabeça Pescoço. 2012; 41(2):93-5. Hupp JR, Tucker MR, Ellis E.Cirurgia oral e maxilofacial contemporânea. 6. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2015. p. 1099-1113. Oliva MA. Acesso subciliar para fraturas do complexozigomático-orbitári. Rev Bras Cir Cabeça Pescoço. 2013;42(2):106-8. Soares LP, Gaião L, Santos MESM, Pozza DH, Oliveira MG. Indicações da Tomografia Computadorizada no Diagnóstico das Fraturas Nasoórbito-etmoidais. Rev de Clin Pesq Odontol. 2004;1(1):29-33. Kurita M, Okazaki M, Ozaki M, Tanaka Y, Tsuji N, Takushima A, et al. Patient satisfaction after open reduction and internal fixation of zygomatic bone fractures. J Craniofac Surg .2010;21(7):45–9. Hammer B. Fraturas orbitárias: Diagnóstico, tratamento cirúrgico, correções secundárias. São Paulo: Santos; 2005. Panarello F, Chaves Júnior AC, Leles JLR, Oliveira MG. Análise dos materiais empregados para a reconstrução das fraturas orbitárias – Revisão de literatura. RBC: Rev Int Cir Traumatol Bucomaxilofacial. 2005;3(9):57-64. Kloss FR, Stigler RG, Brandstätter A, Tuli T, Rasse M, Laimer K, Hächl OL, Gassner R. Complications related to midfacial fractures: operative versus non-surgical treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(1):33-7. Liedtke FS, Richinho KP, Pisanelli CH, Araf D. Fraturas do soalho da órbita do tipo ‘’Blow-out”: revisão de literatura. Revicience 2005;5(5):8-11.

scholarly journals Knowledge, attitude, and perception of oral and maxillofacial surgery specialty amongst healthcare professionals, and the General Public from a Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Country

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Kamal ◽  
Mohammad Abdulwahab ◽  
Ahmed Al-Zaid
Keyword(s):  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
General Public ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Medical Doctors ◽  
Surgical Specialty ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Scenarios

Abstract Background Oral and maxillofacial surgery specialty has grown rapidly in Kuwait in recent years. However, the general public and healthcare professionals remain unaware of its expanding scope of practice. The aim of the study is to assess public and professional (dental and medical) perception of the oral and maxillofacial surgical specialty in Kuwait. Methods This is a cross-sectional study evaluating responses of dental professionals, medical professionals, and general public in Kuwait toward the oral and maxillofacial surgical specialty using a previously validated survey instrument with 100 participants in each group. Participants were asked to choose the most appropriate specialist to treat certain procedures across 4 disciplines: reconstruction, trauma, pathology, and cosmetic. Statistical comparison was conducted between dentists and medical doctors using Fisher’s exact test with a p-value of < 0.05. Results Disparities were noted each group’s responses. Oral and maxillofacial surgery was preferred overall for most clinical scenarios in trauma (p < 0.001), pathology (p < 0.001), and reconstructive surgery (p < 0.001). Plastic surgery was preferred for cosmetic surgeries (p < 0.001). Conclusions This study indicates the need to increase awareness especially towards cosmetic surgery procedures, and conduct health campaigns regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery among healthcare professionals, especially medical doctors, and the general public.

scholarly journals Self-confidence in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a cross-sectional study of undergraduate dental students at Kuwait University

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Kamal ◽  
Mohammad Abdulwahab
Keyword(s):  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Dental Students ◽  
The Self ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Independent Practice ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Kuwait University ◽  
Self Confidence ◽  
Validated Questionnaire ◽  
Surgical Extraction

Abstract Background: To evaluate the self-confidence of undergraduate dental students in relation to oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) in order to assess the teaching curriculum at Kuwait University using a validated questionnaire originally developed by the Association of British Academic Oral Maxillofacial Surgeons (ABAOMS).Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 6th year (n=20) and 7th- year (n=19) dentistry students was conducted Kuwait University Faculty of Dentistry between the 1st and 15th May 2020. The ABAOMS questionnaire is composed of 17 questions assessing various areas of the undergraduate OMFS curriculum. The response options to the questionnaire utilised a Likert scale. Independent sample t-tests were performed to assess the difference in responses between the two year groups. Spearman’s Rho correlations were calculated to measure the strength of association between confidence in all aspects of surgical and forceps exodontia.Results: A total of 39 questionnaires were completed by the students. The majority of students expressed that they feel confident that they have enough knowledge to undertake independent practice (61%). General aspects of the questionnaire were answered favourably except for surgical extraction of teeth, in which both classes reported a lower level of self-confidence.Conclusions: This survey revealed the students’ self-confidence in undertaking independent practice and preforming basic oral surgery procedures. Students felt comfortable with exodontia using forceps and elevators, root removal, managing acute pericoronitis, managing haemorrhage from a socket, assessing impacted teeth, and recognising the clinical features of potentially malignant and malignant lesions of the oral cavity. They reported a lower level of confidence for performing surgical procedures. The ABAOMS survey instrument is a useful and thorough tool to assess the self-confidence of dental students according to their undergraduate oral and maxillofacial surgery teaching.

“AN ANALYSIS OF OPHTHALMIC INJURIES IN PATIENTS WITH MAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA”

2021 ◽  
pp. 81-83
Author(s):  
Sharmila. S ◽  
Abhilash Balakrishnan ◽  
Saji Nair .A ◽  
Ajith Kumar.K
Keyword(s):  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Maxillofacial Trauma ◽  
Facial Trauma ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Ocular Injury ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Facial Fractures ◽  
Periorbital Oedema ◽  
Maxillofacial Fractures ◽  
Ocular Injuries

PURPOSE OFTHE STUDY: To estimate the proportion and types of ophthalmic injuries in patients with maxillofacial fractures PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with maxillofacial trauma, who came to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery Government Dental college Thiruvananthapuram from November 2020 to June 2021were included in this study. The information and data collected included age, sex, mechanism of injury, type of maxillofacial fracture and type of ophthalmic injury. RESULTS: Ocular injury was sustained by 209 patients out of which 180 (86.1%) were males and 29(13.9%)were females. The largest age group of patients associated with ophthalmic injuries were 30-39 years. The etiology of facial fractures or ocular injuries showed that road trafc accidents more frequently resulted in ocular injuries 66.5% followed by assault 18.7% and self fall 14.8%. Ophthalmic injuries occurred mostly in association with orbital fractures 33.5% followed by Zygomatico maxillary complex fracture 26.8%and Maxillary sinus fractures 24.4%. Periorbital oedema was the most common ophthalmic injury accounting for 46.4%of cases followed by Periorbital ecchymosis 35.4% and Subconjuntival haemorrhage 17.2%. CONCLUSION: Mid facial trauma commonly causes ophthalmic injuries of varying degrees. Prompt ophthalmic examination of all patients with mid facial trauma is mandatory to prevent any blinding complications

scholarly journals Outcome of Nasolabial Flap in Buccal Mucosal Reconstruction in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-53
Author(s):  
Rokonuzzaman ◽  
Md Zahedur Rahman ◽  
Md Shahidul Islam
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Surface Texture ◽  
Buccal Mucosa ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Nasolabial Flap ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Orofacial Region

Background: Surgical defects of oral cavity and orofacial region are challenging because of the aesthetic and functional demands and dynamic nature of the area. A multitude of reconstructive options are available and with the advent of musculocutaneous flaps and free microvascular tissue transfer, orofacial reconstruction has entered an era of sophistication whereby repair of defects of all types and sizes has become possible. Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the functional outcome, surface texture and complications of nasolabial flap for reconstruction in the buccal mucosal defects. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted 20 patients with clinical histological diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC;T1-T3 ) involving buccal mucosa attending in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department of Dhaka Dental College and Hospital during this study period were included purposively in the study. All patients were treated by excision of the lesion and subsequent reconstruction of the defect by nasolabial flap. If indicated then patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. They were examined preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, on discharge and 3 months after operation. Data were analyzed by SPSS statistics (version 20) software. To find out the significance of the result one way ANOVA was conducted and the Post Hoc Test was done by LSD. Results: Among 20 patients 15% (3) patients developed infection, 15% (3) patients developed dehiscence. Trismus occurred in 5% (1) patient. In assessment of interincisal opening of the patients, 90% (18) presented with adequate interincisal opening but it has been reduced in 10% (2) patients after radiotherapy. In 90% (18) patients surface texture of the flap were smooth and in 10% (2) were partially smooth. Conclusion:The nasolabial flap has proved to be a useful and reliable option for reconstruction of defects of the buccal mucosa in order to allow wound closure without tension and maintain oral function. KYAMC Journal Vol. 10, No.-1, April 2019, Page 48-53

Referral patterns of emergency physicians regarding head and neck pathology in Western Australia

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 147-150
Author(s):  
Jo Ann Ong ◽  
Dieter Gebauer ◽  
Estie Kruger ◽  
Marc Tennant
Keyword(s):  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders ◽  
Scope Of Practice ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Facial Fractures ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
The Us ◽  
Head And Neck Pathology ◽  
Salivary Gland Disease ◽  
The Uk

Those dual qualified in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) in Australia have a scope of practice that includes dentoalveolar surgery, facial fractures, craniofacial deformities, salivary gland disease, temporomandibular joint disorders, and the treatment of oral and facial cancers with reconstruction. This differs from other countries such as the UK, the US, France and Brazil, which can lead to complexities of interaction when internationally trained health professionals, who may be unaware of this wide breadth of practice, are the ‘gatekeepers’ at tertiary health facilities. 1 – 3

In-Field Extremity Amputation: Prevalence and Protocols in Emergency Medical Services

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn E. Kampen ◽  
Jon R. Krohmer ◽  
Jeffrey S. Jones ◽  
J.M. Dougherty ◽  
Robert K. Bonness
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Emergency Medical Services ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Epidemiological Survey ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Vehicle Accidents ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Trauma Surgeons ◽  
And Training

AbstractObjective:To determine current experience, attitudes, and training concerning the performance of in-field extremity amputations in North America.Design:Cross-sectional, epidemiological survey.Participants:Emergency medical services (EMS) directors from the 200 largest metropolitan areas in North America and attendees at the 1992 Mid-Year National Association of EMS Physicians Meeting.Interventions:The survey consisted of five questions focusing on demographic and operational data, the frequency of occurrence of the performance of in-field amputations, personnel responsible for performing the procedure, existing written protocols for the procedure, and the scope of training provided.Results:A total of 143 surveys was completed. Eighteen respondents (13%) reported a total of 26 in-field extremity amputations in the past five years. The most common cause for the injuries requiring amputations was motor-vehicle accidents. In the majority of cases (53.2%), trauma surgeons were responsible for performing the amputation, followed by emergency physicians (36.4%). Of respondents, 96% stated that there was no training available through their EMS agencies related to the performance of in-field extremity amputations. Only two EMS systems had an existing protocol regarding in-field amputations.Conclusions:The results suggest a need for established protocols to make the procedure easily accessible when needed, especially in large metropolitan EMS systems. This information should be emphasized during EMS training and reinforced through continuing education.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document