scholarly journals Operative Treatment for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Cartilage ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youichi Yasui ◽  
Adi Wollstein ◽  
Christopher D. Murawski ◽  
John G. Kennedy

Objective Numerous basic science articles have published evidence supporting the use of biologic augmentation in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). However, a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical outcomes of those treatment modalities in OLT has yet to be published. The purpose of this review is to provide an evidence-based overview of clinical outcomes following biologic augmentation to surgical treatments for OLT. Design A comprehensive literature review was performed. Two commonly used surgical techniques for the treatment of OLT—bone marrow stimulation and osteochondral autograft transfer—are first introduced. The review describes the operative indications, step-by- step operative procedure, clinical outcomes, and concerns associated with each treatment. A review of the currently published basic science and clinical evidence on biologic augmentation in the surgical treatments for OLT, including platelet-rich plasma, concentrated bone marrow aspirate, and scaffold-based therapy follows. Results Biologic agents and scaffold-based therapies appear to be promising agents, capable of improving both clinical and radiological outcomes in OLT. Nevertheless, variable production methods of these biologic augmentations confound the interpretation of clinical outcomes of cases treated with these agents. Conclusions Current clinical evidence supports the use of biologic agents in OLT cases. Nonetheless, well-designed clinical trials with patient-specific, validated and objective outcome measurements are warranted to develop standardized clinical guidelines for the use of biologic augmentation for the treatment of OLT in clinical practice.

Author(s):  
Quinten G. H. Rikken ◽  
Jari Dahmen ◽  
Sjoerd A. S. Stufkens ◽  
Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs

Abstract Purpose The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS) for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) at long-term follow-up. Methods A literature search was conducted from the earliest record until March 2021 to identify studies published using the PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), and Cochrane Library databases. Clinical studies reporting on arthroscopic BMS for OLTs at a minimum of 8-year follow-up were included. The review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two authors independently conducted the article selection and conducted the quality assessment using the Methodological index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS). The primary outcome was defined as clinical outcomes consisting of pain scores and patient-reported outcome measures. Secondary outcomes concerned the return to sport rate, reoperation rate, complication rate, and the rate of progression of degenerative changes within the tibiotalar joint as a measure of ankle osteoarthritis. Associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated based on the primary and secondary outcome measures. Results Six studies with a total of 323 ankles (310 patients) were included at a mean pooled follow-up of 13.0 (9.5–13.9) years. The mean MINORS score of the included studies was 7.7 out of 16 points (range 6–9), indicating a low to moderate quality. The mean postoperative pooled American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 83.8 (95% CI 83.6–84.1). 78% (95% CI 69.5–86.8) participated in sports (at any level) at final follow-up. Return to preinjury level of sports was not reported. Reoperations were performed in 6.9% (95% CI 4.1–9.7) of ankles and complications related to the BMS procedure were observed in 2% (95% CI 0.4–3.0) of ankles. Progression of degenerative changes was observed in 28% (95% CI 22.3–33.2) of ankles. Conclusion Long-term clinical outcomes following arthroscopic BMS can be considered satisfactory even though one in three patients show progression of degenerative changes from a radiological perspective. These findings indicate that OLTs treated with BMS may be at risk of progressing towards end-stage ankle osteoarthritis over time in light of the incremental cartilage damage cascade. The findings of this study can aid clinicians and patients with the shared decision-making process when considering the long-term outcomes of BMS. Level of evidence Level IV.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1172-1179
Author(s):  
James P. Stannard ◽  
James T. Stannard ◽  
Anna J. Schreiner

AbstractKnee patients who have sustained chondral and osteochondral lesions suffer from debilitating pain, which can ultimately lead to posttraumatic osteoarthritis and whole-joint disease. Older, nonactive patients are traditionally steered toward total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but younger, active patients are not good candidates for TKA based on implant longevity, complications, morbidity, and risk for revision, such that treatment strategies at restoring missing hyaline cartilage and bone are highly desired for this patient population. Over the past four decades, fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation has been developed as a treatment method for large (> 2.5 cm2) focal full-thickness articular cartilage lesions. This article documents our own institutional OCA journey since 2016 through enhanced graft preservation techniques (the Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System, or MOPS), technical improvements in surgical techniques, use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate, bioabsorbable pins and nails, and prescribed and monitored patient-specific rehabilitation protocols. Further follow-up with documentation of long-term outcomes will provide insight for continued optimization for future applications for OCA transplantation, potentially including a broader spectrum of patients appropriate for this treatment. Ongoing translational research is necessary to blaze the trail in further optimizing this treatment option for patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0006
Author(s):  
Jae Han Park ◽  
Jin Woo Lee ◽  
Kwang Hwan Park ◽  
Sang B. Kim ◽  
Yoo Jung Park ◽  
...  

Category: Arthroscopy; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS) has been considered as the 1st-line treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) with its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, low complication rate and successful clinical results in numerous studies. However, there were few studies which had investigated long-term clinical outcomes about the arthroscopic BMS. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of arthroscopic BMS for OLT and to identify prognostic factors that affect the outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for 202 ankles (189 patients) who underwent arthroscopic BMS as a primary surgery for the OLT between January 2001 and December 2008 with more than 10 years of follow-up. Visual analog scale (VAS) and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scales, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were assessed as clinical outcomes and re-operation data were collected. The clinical scores were compared along the stream of time. Kaplan-Meier plot and log rank test showed survival outcomes of OLT in the long-term follow-up. Factors associated with revision surgery were evaluated with multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results: The VAS scales were improved from 7.11 +- 1.73 (preoperatively) to 1.51 +- 1.61 (3 to 6 years after BMS), and 2.00 +- 1.67 (over 10 years after BMS) (P < 0.001). Also the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale were also improved from 58.39 +- 13.7373 (preoperatively) to 85.85 +- 10.31 (3 to 6 years after BMS), and 82.56 +- 11.62 (over 10 years after BMS) (P < 0.001). FAOS at final follow-up was compatible with those of other literatures with short- and mid-term follow-up. Re-operation rate was 5.94 % (12 / 202 ankles). According to multivariate regression analysis, significant factors associated with the revision surgery were large- size (greater than 150mm2) OLT (P = 0.009) and body mass index greater than 25 kg/m2 (P = 0.014). Conclusion:: Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation is an effective and reliable operative procedure for the primary treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with favorable long-term outcomes at a mean follow-up of 13.9 years. Therefore, we recommend this procedure for the 1st-line treatment of the OLT. Success of arthroscopic BMS depends on the size of the OLT and the body mass index of patients.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5535-5535
Author(s):  
Steven M. Fruchtman ◽  
Abdullah Mahmood Ali ◽  
Michael E. Petrone ◽  
Patrick Simon Zbyszewski ◽  
Benjamin Hoffman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Lower risk non-del5q MDS patients (pts) have limited treatment options and majority pts are transfusion dependent. Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) are first line of therapy for LR-MDS pts but almost half are resistant to ESA or become resistant after responding. Hence, LR-MDS represents an area of unmet medical need for novel agents to improve hematopoiesis and reduce transfusion dependency. Rigosertib (RIG) blocks RAS-mediated activation of proteins containing a common RAS binding domain, or RBD (Athuluri-Divaker, et al; Cell 165; 643'16). Since many pathways include proteins that employ RBD (i.e. ras, raf PI3-Kinase), interference with RBD provides a novel approach to block proliferation. While RIG showed encouraging response in LR-MDS pts (Tycko, et al; Blood 2013; 122:2745), there is a need for a biomarker that can differentiate responders from non-responders. To correlate genomics with response to RIG, we employed computational tools to integrate molecular data and observed responses. Aim: To determine predictive value of a computational biology derived genomic signature in LR-MDS pts who are treated with RIG. Methods: Materials were derived from Phase I and II studies of RIG in LR-MDS pts. Efficacy was reported as transfusion independence. Bone marrow samples were collected and processed using standard methods. DNA was extracted from bone marrow mononuclear cells or T-cells (germline control) purified from peripheral blood samples. Exome sequencing was performed using Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon v4 - 51Mb kit and HiSeq 2000. Raw sequences were aligned to the human genome build hg19 using BWA software; SNPs and In/Dels analysis was performed using PICARD, SAMTOOLS and GATK. These results, entered into predictive computational biology software (Cellworks Group), generated disease-specific protein network maps using PubMed and other online resources. Digital drug simulations are conducted by measuring drug effect on a score: a composite of cell proliferation, viability and apoptosis. Each patient-specific network map was screened for RIG reduced progression in a dose-respondent manner. Computer predictions were blindly correlated with clinical outcomes. Results: Predicted response was blindly correlated with the clinical outcome for 19 pts: Results showed 16 matches and 3 mismatches; and the following predictive test statistics: PPV - 81.25%, NPV - 100%, Sensitivity - 100%: accuracy of the predictive test at 84.21%. Modeling of LR-MDS pts predicted amplification of genes MYC, FNTA on chromosome 8; amplification of genes LGALS3, AJUBA, MAX on chromosome 14; TIAM1 on chromosome 21; HMGCR, on chromosome 5; PDPK1, MAPK3, PLK1 on chromosome 16 and PIK3CA, RAF1 on chromosome 3 correlated with increased response to RIG. Aberrations that enhanced the downstream of RAS signaling via the RAF-ERK or PI3K-AKT-MTOR pathway increased the signal flow through the drug response paths. MYC amplification on chromosome 8 via increasing the Purine synthesis pathway and production of GTP increased the RAS-ERK and RHEB-MTOR signaling. MYC also enhanced CCND1 production/proliferation. Prenylation pathway genes FNTA and HMGCR amplification also affect RAS and RHEB; enhance the drug response pathways. Another pathway that was found to be significant in the drug response, reducing proliferation, was inhibition of PLK1 and AURKA. Amplification of AJUBA, PLK1 made this pathway more significant and improved drug response via inhibition of proliferation via TIAM1-RAC1-PAK1-AURKA-PLK1 and RAF-PLK1 pathway. Deletion of TP53 and NF1 on chromosome 17 did not correlate with response. MYC amplification was seen in LR and HR MDS pts and correlated with response to RIG. However, the computational biology method showed that MYC amplification alone is not a predictor for response since there were non-responder profiles with MYC amplification and responder profiles with MYC deletion that had other aberrations in genes on chromosomes 3, 14, 16 or 21. Conclusions: A predictive method that models multiple genomic abnormalities simultaneously showed greater than 80% correlation between RIG mediated protein network perturbations and clinical outcomes in LR-MDS. The method also explained lack of response and highlighted resistance pathways that could be targeted to recover sensitivity. We also established eligibility criteria for greater precision enrollment in future trials. Disclosures Fruchtman: Onconova: Employment. Petrone:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment. Zbyszewski:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment. Hoffman:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment. Vali:Cellworks Group: Employment. Singh:Cellworks Group: Employment. Usmani:Cellworks: Employment. Grover:Cellworks Group: Employment. Abbasi:Cellworks: Employment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0050
Author(s):  
William Bugbee

Objectives: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation of the knee is an effective treatment for chondral and osteochondral lesions, but graft survivorship and clinical outcomes vary by patient-specific factors. Fresh OCA are often used for large or complex lesions or in the revision cartilage repair setting, but recent literature suggests that the most ideal candidates for OCA transplantation may be young patients with a small lesion on the femoral condyle or trochlea due to osteochondritis dissecans or chondral trauma. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes following OCA transplantation in a cohort of “ideal” candidates. Methods: We identified 91 patients (97 knees) who underwent primary OCA transplantation for osteochondritis dissecans (88%) or a traumatic chondral injury (12%), were age 30 years or younger, and had an isolated lesion(s) of the femoral condyle or trochlea less than 8 cm2. Mean age was 20 years and 70% were male. Lesions were located on the femoral condyle (85%) or trochlea (15%). One graft was used in 85% of knees and two grafts were used in 15%. Mean total graft area was 5.2 cm2. Evaluation included pain, function, satisfaction, and reoperations. OCA failure was defined as revision allografting or conversion to arthroplasty. Median follow-up was 5.7 years (range 2-17 years). Results: Seventeen knees (18%) underwent reoperations. Two knees (2%) were classified as OCA failures (one revision OCA at 2.7 years and one conversion to unicompartmental arthroplasty at 10.2 years). Survivorship was 99% at 5 and 10 years. Pain and function improved (Table 1.), and 93% of patients were satisfied with the results of the OCA transplantation. Conclusion: In this cohort of “ideal” cartilage repair patients undergoing OCA transplantation, graft survivorship and clinical outcomes were excellent, with high satisfaction, pain relief, and functional improvement. Outcomes were equal or superior to other cartilage repair techniques. [Table: see text]


2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 2503-2508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiharu Shimozono ◽  
Eoghan T. Hurley ◽  
Youichi Yasui ◽  
Timothy W. Deyer ◽  
John G. Kennedy

Background: Subchondral bone marrow edema (BME) has been associated with articular cartilage loss, with the potential to be a negative prognostic indicator for clinical outcomes after microfracture. However, no single study has investigated the association between BME and clinical outcomes after microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) at midterm follow-up. Purpose: To clarify the association between postoperative subchondral BME and clinical outcomes in patients treated with microfracture for OLTs at both short-term and midterm follow-up using a grading system that classified the extent of BME of the talus. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent microfracture between 2008 and 2013 were assessed at 2- and 4-year postoperative follow-up. BME was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging, and the presence of subchondral BME was determined with fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: Forty-three (83%) of 52 eligible patients were included. No significant differences were found in the FAOS between the BME and no BME groups at 2-year follow-up (83.1 ± 6.5 vs 88.6 ± 8.0, respectively; P = .109), but there was a significant difference at 4-year follow-up (77.5 ± 11.1 vs 84.7 ± 8.4, respectively; P = .041). A significant difference was found among BME grades at 4-year follow-up (grade 0: 84.7 ± 7.4, grade 1: 80.1 ± 10.5, grade 2: 74.0 ± 10.3, and grade 3: 67.5 ± 7.1; P = .035). A post hoc analysis showed significant differences between grades 0 and 2, 0 and 3, and 1 and 3 ( P = .041, .037, and .048, respectively). In addition, at 4-year follow-up, a significant correlation was noted between the FAOS and BME grade ( r = −0.453, P = .003) but not at 2-year follow-up ( r = −0.212, P = .178). Seventy-four percent of patients still had subchondral BME at 4-year follow-up after microfracture for OLTs. Conclusion: Patients with subchondral BME at midterm follow-up after microfracture for OLTs had worse clinical outcomes than those without subchondral BME. In addition, the degree of subchondral BME at midterm follow-up was correlated with clinical outcomes. However, at short-term follow-up, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes based on both the presence and degree of BME, and no correlation was found between clinical outcomes and the degree of BME. The current study suggests that BME at short-term follow-up is a normal physiological reaction. However, BME at midterm follow-up after microfracture for OLTs may be pathological and is associated with poorer clinical outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0009
Author(s):  
Kwang Hwan Park ◽  
JaeHan Park ◽  
Jai Bum Kwon ◽  
Seung Hwan Han ◽  
Jin Woo Lee

Category: Arthroscopy Introduction/Purpose: Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) has presented promising clinical outcomes in recent studies. However, there were few studies which had investigated long-term clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for osteochondral lesion of the talus and to identify prognostic factors that affect the outcome. Methods: Between January 2001 and December 2007, 159 patients (172 ankles) with OLT underwent arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation as a primary surgery. Clinical outcomes were assessed using visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and re-operation rate. Factors associated with re-operation were evaluated using bivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier plot showed survival outcomes of OLT in long-term follow-up. Results: The mean follow-up time was 12.7 years (range 10.1-16.8) and the mean size of the lesion was 105.4 mm2 (range 19.8- 322.8). The mean VAS improved from 7.21 ± 1.71 to 1.76 ± 1.60. The mean preoperative AOFAS score was 57.98 ±14.43 and the mean postoperative AOFAS was 82.91 ± 11.58. FAOS at the time of final follow-up was comparable with those of previous literatures which showed outcomes of surgical treatments of OLT in short- and mid-term follow-up. Re-operation rate was 6.40% (11 patients with 12 revision surgery) including seven cases of re-arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation, and five cases of OAT. According to bivariate analysis, significant factor associated with re-operation was large sized OLT in preoperative MRI measurement. Conclusion: Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for osteochondral lesion of the talus has made satisfactory clinical outcomes through long-term follow-up over 10 years.


Author(s):  
Vincenzo Candela ◽  
Umile Giuseppe Longo ◽  
Mauro Ciuffreda ◽  
Giuseppe Salvatore ◽  
Alessandra Berton ◽  
...  

ImportanceNo accepted definition of lesion size exists to treat osteochondral defects (OCD) of talus with bone marrow stimulation.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to establish a relationship between the clinical outcomes and size of OCD lesion to identify the area or diameter best suited to be treated with arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation.Evidence reviewA search was conducted of level I through IV studies from January 2000 to August 2017, to identify studies reporting on talus OCDs treated with bone marrow stimulation. 21 articles were identified. The overall quality of evidence was fair.Findings21 articles were included in which 1303 ankles with OCD of talus were evaluated. Patients were assessed at a median follow-up period of 38.1 months, ranging from 6.3 to 217 months. Considering a cut-off of an area <1.5 cm2 or with a diameter ≤1.5 cm, the mean postoperative AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) value was 89.1±3 and 84.65±2.7, respectively (p=0.016).Conclusions and relevanceDespite the current lack of high-level evidence, our results suggest that bone marrow stimulation techniques provide an effective and reliable means to treat small to mid-sized OCD. Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for isolated osteochondral lesions of the talus is a safe and effective procedure that provides good clinical outcomes for lesions with an area less than 1.5 cm2 or with a diameter less than 1.5 cm. The attempt to find a new cut-off value to identify more precisely good outcome lesions was unsuccessful. However, the long-term benefits of bone marrow stimulation techniques should be tested in larger cohort of patients with longer term evaluations.Level of evidenceSystematic review, level III.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document