BACKGROUND Anaesthesia for neurosurgery requires special considerations. The brain is enclosed in a rigid cranium, so the rise in intracranial pressure (ICP) which impairs cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), results in irrepairable damage to various vital areas in the brain. Stable head position is required in long neurosurgical procedures. This is obtained with the use of clamps which fix the head rigidly. This is done usually under general anaesthesia because it produces intense painful stimuli leading to stimulation of sympathetic nervous system which in turn causes release of vasoconstrictive agents. This can impair perfusion in all organ systems. The increase in blood pressure due to sympathetic nervous system causes increase in blood flow. This causes increases in intracranial pressure which result in reduction in cerebral perfusion pressure once the auto regulatory limits are exceeded. We compared the effects of dexmedetomidine 1 µgm/kg and propofol 100 µgm/kg given as infusion over a period of 10 minutes before the induction of anaesthesia and continued till 5 minutes after pinning to attenuate the stress response while cranial pinning. In this study, we wanted to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol as infusion to attenuate the stress response while cranial pinning in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. METHODS This is a randomized interventional trial. Patients were divided into 2 groups of 20 each. Group 1 receiving dexmedetomidine and group 2 receiving propofol, both drugs given as infusion. Haemodynamic variables were monitored before and after cranial pinning. Data was analysed using IBM statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) statistics. The parameters recorded were analysed with the help of a statistician. RESULTS The two groups were comparable in demographic data. Incidence of tachycardia between group 1 and 2 showed that tachycardia to pinning was better controlled with propofol than dexmedetomidine (P < 0.05) which is statistically significant. There is no statistically significant difference in blood pressure values between group 1 and 2 after pinning. CONCLUSIONS From our study, we came to a conclusion that propofol was superior to dexmedetomidine in attenuating the heart rate response to cranial pinning. The effect of propofol and dexmedetomidine was comparable in attenuating the blood pressure response to cranial pinning. KEYWORDS Cranial Pinning, Dexmedetomidine, Propofol
ULTRASTRUCTURAL IDENTIFICATION OF CATECHOLAMINE-CONTAINING CENTRAL SYNAPTIC TERMINALS
