ESPN and the Hostile Media Effect

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 728-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Galen Clavio ◽  
Ryan Vooris

Recent layoffs at sports media giant Entertainment and Sports Programming Network (ESPN) have caused some commentators to question whether the network’s forays into social and political commentary are at the heart of shrinking revenue streams. Several conservative political commentators have accused ESPN of a liberal bias in their recent coverage of social issues within and related to sport. This study examined the political perception of ESPN by audiences, by applying a perceptual theory of communication known as the hostile media effect. Prior research of the hostile media effect has found that audiences with strongly held beliefs subjectively perceive media bias relative to their own beliefs, whether or not any actual bias is being demonstrated by the media source in question. Through a nationwide survey, study subjects were asked about their political leanings, media consumption, and views on ESPN. Statistical analysis found that individuals with conservative political leanings were more likely than others to view ESPN as hostile to their political beliefs, and those who perceived ESPN as hostile media were less likely to trust ESPN to cover social and political issues fairly.

Author(s):  
Lauren Feldman

The “hostile media effect” occurs when opposing partisans perceive identical news coverage of a controversial issue as biased against their own side. This is a robust phenomenon, which has been empirically demonstrated in numerous experimental and observational studies across a variety of issue contexts and has been shown to have important consequences for democratic society. This chapter reviews the literature on the hostile media effect with an eye toward the theoretical explanations for it, its relationship to other psychological processes, and its broader implications for perceived public opinion, news consumption patterns, attitudes toward democratic institutions, and political discourse and participation. Particular attention is paid to how the hostile media phenomenon can help explain the public’s eroding trust in the news media and the recent polarization among news audiences. The chapter concludes with several suggestions for future research.


2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 747-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert C. Gunther ◽  
Nicole Miller ◽  
Janice L. Liebhart

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 365-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron S. Veenstra ◽  
Benjamin A. Lyons ◽  
İ. Alev Degim Flannagan

2003 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura M. Arpan ◽  
Arthur A. Raney

This study examined the interaction among different news sources, individual levels of partisanship, and the hostile media effect in sports news. Two hundred and three participants read a balanced story about their home-town college football team in one of three newspapers: the home-town, the cross-state rival university's town, or a neutral-town paper. The study found differences in the hostile media effect across conditions, suggesting the importance of news source in the phenomenon. Further, findings indicate strong support for the hostile media effect among sports news consumers.


2004 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert C. Gunther ◽  
Kathleen Schmitt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document