scholarly journals Total knee arthroplasty conversion for patients with ankylosed knees

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949901668409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-June Kim ◽  
Jong-Uk Mun ◽  
Kwang-Hwan Kim ◽  
Hee-Soo Kyung

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of total knee arthroplasty for patients with ankylosed knees. Methods: We evaluated seven patients (10 knees) who underwent total knee arthroplasties for ankylosed knees from 1995 to 2008. There were two men and five women, with a mean age of 44.1 years (42–48 years). The mean follow-up period was 10.2 years (1–19.5 years). A rectus snip was performed in all cases, and V-Y quadricepsplasty was used in one case of severe quadriceps contracture. In all cases, we used the PFC Sigma PS fixed model (DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., Warsaw, Indiana, USA). The goal was more than 90° of flexion. Clinical evaluation was performed using range of motion (ROM), Knee Society (KS) Knee Score, KS Function Score, and complications. Radiographs were used to evaluate loosening or osteolysis. Results: The ROF was improved from 9.5° (0–30°) to 78.5° (15–115°), The Knee Score improved from 42.6 (25–70) to 68.6 (41–97), and the Function Score improved from 39 (0–60) to 66 (40–90). A radiolucent line was detected in two cases (one patient) around the tibial component, and one case had a necrosis of skin edge. Only one case had no improvement of motion. Conclusion: Total knee arthroplasty conversion for patients with ankylosed knees can achieve good results for motion and function without osteotomy of the tibial tuberosity when there is good quality soft tissue of the thigh.

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0001
Author(s):  
Hagen Hommel

A bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) guided-motion total knee arthroplasty (TKA) design was introduced to improve knee kinematics by more closely approximating those of a normal knee. Previous studies have shown a high incidence of complications with this implant type, which led to recent modifications of the design by the manufacturer. The current study was undertaken to assess whether the use of a guided-motion knee system with an extension-first surgical technique is associated with a similar rate of short-term adverse outcome as reported in literature. The secondary aim was to assess if there were any differences between the original and modified implant designs. This retrospective study enrolled 204 consecutive patients (204 knees) undergoing TKA for osteoarthritis of the knee, with the first 154 receiving cemented Journey BCS I implants and the remaining 51 receiving cemented Journey BCS II implants when these became available. At follow-up, patients were tested for the presence of iliotibial friction syndrome (ITB-F) and midflexion instability. Knee score and function score were taken preoperatively, at one year, and at final follow-up. Outcome data between the two implant types were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. No patients were lost to follow-up. Mean follow-up time for the cohort was 24.5 ± 7.8 months (range, 12 - 36 months). There were no cases of stiffness (flexion < 90°). Incidence of ITB-F syndrome was considered low: three (2.0%) knees in the BCS I group and two (3.9%) in the BCS II group (p = 0.367). Five (2.5%) knees presented with mild instability in midflexion, three (2.0%) in the BCS I group and two (3.9%) in the BCS II group (p = 0.367). One patient with a BCS I implant required reoperation for aseptic loosening 23 months postoperatively. At one-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in range of motion, knee score, or function score. When used in combination with an extension-first surgical technique, good early functional results with an acceptable rate of complications were obtained with both the original and the updated Journey BCS knee implant. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to confirm our findings.


2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (7_Supple_C) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. F. Lachiewicz ◽  
J. A. O’Dell

Aims There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of alternative polyethylene bearings in modular, fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare standard polyethylene (SP) and highly crosslinked polyethylene (XLP) tibial liners in posterior-stabilized TKA, with osteolysis as the primary outcome and clinical results and the rate of re-operation as the secondary outcomes. Patients and Methods This is a single-surgeon, prospective randomized study involving one design of modular posterior-stabilized TKA. An analysis of 122 TKAs with an SP compression moulded liner and 123 with an XLP liner was performed, with a mean follow-up of six years (2 to 11). Patients were evaluated clinically using the Knee Society score, Lower Extremity Activity Score (LEAS), and the presence of an effusion, and standard radiographs were assessed for radiolucent lines and osteolytic lesions. Results Osteolysis was present in four TKAs (3.3%) in the SP group, and no knees in the XLP group (p = 0.06). There were no significant differences between the Knee Society total score, change in total score, knee function score, change in function score, LEAS, and change in LEAS in the two groups. There was a significant difference in the presence of an effusion (10/122 with SP liners, 1/123 with XLP liners; p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the rate of re-operation between the two groups (p = 0.36). There were no complications related to the XLP liner. Conclusion At this length of follow-up, there were no advantages and no complications related to the use of this XLP tibial liner. The presence of effusion and small osteolytic lesions was more frequent with SP than XLP liners, but of unknown clinical significance. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):33–39


2020 ◽  
pp. 2050020
Author(s):  
Xabier Foruria ◽  
Jesús Moreta ◽  
Carlos Jaramillo ◽  
Ane Anton ◽  
Isidoro Calvo ◽  
...  

Objective: Patient-specific positioning guides have been designed to improve precision in total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to evaluate the medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes with magnetic resonance imaging-based patient-specific positioning guides. Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients from two centers treated with total knee arthroplasty performed with patient-specific positioning guides. We enrolled patients operated on between January 2011 and December 2013, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Preoperative and postoperative hip knee angle (HKA) and position of each component in the coronal plane were assessed. Overall malalignment was defined as an outlier of more than [Formula: see text] from the neutral mechanical axis and specific malalignment as when any component showed more than [Formula: see text] of deviation. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee Score. Results: This study included 68 patients with a mean age of 72 years. The mean postoperative alignment (HKA) was [Formula: see text] and 26.5% of patients showed coronal malalignment [Formula: see text]. Regarding femoral components, 19.1% showed specific malalignment [Formula: see text], while 11.7% of tibial components were classified as outliers. The mean HSS Knee Score at final follow up was 89.2. Patients whose implants were mechanically aligned did not obtain better functional outcomes ([Formula: see text]). Conclusion: In our series, the use of patient-specific positioning guides resulted in a range of mechanical malalignment, similar to conventional instrumentation results reported in the literature.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunfei Hou ◽  
Jiaxiang Gao ◽  
Jian Chen ◽  
Jianhao Lin ◽  
Lei Ni ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To investigate the feasibility, safety and therapeutic efficacy of arthroscopy in managing the 3 most common soft tissue complications, peripatellar impingement (PI), arthrofibrosis (AF) and generalized synovitis (GS), after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods A retrospective review of patients undertaking arthroscopy for PI, AF and GS was conducted. Outcome measures included complications, postoperative range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS) and rates of symptom recurrence, prosthesis revision. Intraoperative findings and surgical procedures were also recorded. Paired t test, Fisher’s exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction were used for statistical evaluation. Results A total of 74 patients, including 35 patients with peripatellar impingement, 25 patients with arthrofibrosis and 14 patients with generalized synovitis, with a mean age of 66.1 ± 7.9 years, were analysed. The mean follow-up (FU) duration was 81.3 ± 40.6 months. All patients underwent arthroscopic surgery safely without intraoperative complications. However, there were 4 postoperative complications, including 1 acute myocardial infarction and 3 periprosthetic joint infections. Overall, patients acquired improvements in ROM from 81.7 ± 23.1° to 96.8 ± 20.5° (p < 0.05), in KSS knee score from 64.2 ± 9.6 to 78.7 ± 12.1 (p < 0.05) and in KSS function score from 61.1 ± 7.4 to 77.3 ± 12.2 (p < 0.05) postoperatively. Patients in all 3 groups had improvements in ROM (p < 0.05), KSS knee score (p < 0.05) and KSS function score (p < 0.05). The overall recurrence rate was 22.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.1–34.9%), and the overall revision rate was 14.9% (95% CI 8.6–25.6%). There were significant differences in both the symptom recurrence and prosthesis revision rates among the groups (p < 0.05). The PI group had a significantly lower symptom recurrence rate (11.4%, 95% CI 4.5–28.7%) and revision rate (8.6%, 95% CI 2.9–25.3%) (p < 0.017), while the GS group had a significantly higher recurrence rate (42.9%, 95% CI 23.4–78.5%) and revision rate (35.7%, 95% CI 17.6–72.1%) (p < 0.017). Conclusions In the setting of symptomatic TKA, although carrying certain risks for PJI and other complications, arthroscopic intervention could be feasible and provide clinical improvement in most cases at an average of 81.3 months follow-up. Patients with PI had the best outcomes, while patients with GS had the worst outcomes. Level of evidence Level IV


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (01) ◽  
pp. 115-120
Author(s):  
Ali Utkan ◽  
Emrah Caliskan ◽  
Batuhan Gencer ◽  
Bulent Ozkurt

AbstractAlthough there are numerous studies about routine histopathological analysis during arthroplasty surgeries, most of them showed that new diagnoses have rarely been obtained as a result. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of routine pathological analyses of synovia resected during primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis and its relevance in the treatment process. Of the 47 included patients who were followed up prospectively, 26 patients had clinical and histopathological concordant diagnoses and 21 patients had discrepant diagnoses. Oxford knee score and visual analogue score were performed for all the patients. Kallgren-Lawrence score was used for radiological analyses. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to examine the differences between the abnormally distributed variables. Mean age was 65.9 ± 4.3 years (range, 50–89 years) and mean follow-up time was 19 ± 7.8 months (range, 6–39 months). Grade IV gonarthrosis was found to be statistically lower in the discrepant group (p = 0.046). The mean preoperative Oxford knee score was 16.8 ± 2.3 (range, 2–23) and the mean postoperative Oxford knee score was 44.6 ± 1.8 (range, 27–48; p = 0.016). Postoperative Oxford knee scores and VAS were significantly increased in both the concordant and discrepant groups (p = 0.026 and p = 0.035, p = 0.019 and p = 0.039, respectively). Resection and histopathologic analyses of the hypertrophied and inflamed synovium encountered during primary arthroplasty procedure should be performed. This examination not only could provide crucial information that may influence the postoperative follow-up guidelines but also could help us to expand our knowledge and awareness of rare diseases that might yield osteoarthritis. The level of evidence for the study is level II.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Chen ◽  
Yanyan Shi ◽  
Zhanpo Wu ◽  
Zengxin Gao ◽  
Youmin Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To determine the long-term effects (a minimum follow-up time 8.8 years) of cemented and cementless fixations used for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and China Wangfang database were interrogated for appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through July 2020. Data were extracted and assessed for accuracy by 2 of the authors acting independently. Any controversial discrepancies were resolved after discussion with a third author. Result Eight RCTs were included with low to moderate bias risks. The cemented fixation of TKA was comparable to cementless fixation in terms of implant survival (relative risk, 1.016; 95% CI 0.978 to 1.056; P = 0.417), Knee Society (KS) knee score (standardized mean difference (SMD), − 0.107; 95% CI − 0.259 to 0.045; P = 0.168), KS function score (SMD − 0.065; 95% CI − 0.238 to 0.109; P = 0.463), KS pain score (SMD − 0.300; 95% CI − 0.641 to 0.042; P = 0.085), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score (SMD − 0.117; 95% CI − 0.307 to 0.073; P = 0.227), HSS score (SMD − 0.027; 95% CI − 0.270 to 0.217; P = 0.829), range of motion (SMD 0.061; 95% CI − 0.205 to 0.327; P = 0.652) at ≥ 8.8 years of follow-up. In terms of radiographic outcomes at ≥ 8.8 years of follow-up, the incidence of a radiolucent line in the cementless group was lower than for the cemented group (SMD 3.828; 95% CI 2.228 to 6.576; P < 0.001). However, the maximum total point motion (MTPM) of the cementless group was greater than for the cemented group (SMD − 0.739; 95% CI − 1.474 to − 0.005; P = 0.048). Conclusions Long-term follow-up verified that cementless and cemented fixation have similar prosthesis survival rates, clinical scores and mobility. However, radiography suggested that each technique had an advantage with regard to the radiolucent line and MTPM.


2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 2222-2227
Author(s):  
George Viscopoleanu ◽  
Bogdan Sendrea ◽  
Emil Haritinian

The objectives of the current study were to identify the causes leading to revision knee arthroplasty, analyse implant choices and assess the short-term outcome. The current study is a retrospective on including a group of 33 patients operated between Jan 2013-Dec 2016 in a single institution. Data was collected from the Romanian National Arthroplasty Register. The cause for revision surgery was noted, as well as the type of implant used during the surgical procedure. The bony defect was classified according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Classification and the reconstruction method was analysed. Functional outcome was assessed using Oxford Knee Score preoperatively and at one year follow-up. Infection was the cause of failure in 18 cases, aseptic loosening in 11 cases, malposition of implants in 2 cases, instability in 1 case and periprosthetic fracture in 1 case. Revision implants were chosen based on joint stability and degree bone loss. The preferred implant was a condylar constrained knee type (20 cases), followed by a rotating hinge type (5 cases). An unconstrained implant was used in 2 cases. Six infected cases required an arthrodesis of the knee. Based on the AORI Classification, there were 10 type III defects, 14 type IIB, 8 type IIA and only one type I defect. Metal augments were preferred for reconstruction of bone defects. Bone graft was used in 8 cases. The mean Oxford Knee Score was 15 pre-op (12-20) and 38 post-op (32-45). Implant survival at final follow-up was 100%. The most common cause of failure of primary total knee arthroplasty is prosthetic joint infection. Bone defects can be addressed using metal augments or bone allograft. Postoperative functional outcome is improved irrespective of the type of implant used.


2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
Marcin Para ◽  
◽  
Paweł Bartosz ◽  
Maciej Kogut ◽  
Gracjan Suchodolski ◽  
...  

Introduction. Complications after arthroplasty often result in irreversible disability. In some cases, for the extremity to be salvaged, permanent knee joint arthrodesis is a last-chance procedure. Modular implant design simplifies surgical technique and knee arthrodesis without bone-on-bone contact, immediately provides full weight bearing and restores limb length and alignment. Puropose. The aim of this article was to perform a clinical evaluation of patients after knee arthrodesis with a dedicated modular intramedullary nail without bone-on-bone contact after a failed infected total knee arthroplasty. Methods. Between 2017 and 2021, 17 patients were treated with knee arthrodesis with a modular nail after a septic complication of total knee arthroplasty. Clinical evaluation of 15 patients was obtained during a follow-up visit, including: the pain severity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), physical function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford Knee Score, gait independence, and the shortening of the affected limb in relation to the other one. Results. The mean follow-up duration was 1.4 years. The group included 11 women and 4 men with an average of 69.3 (57–84) years. All nails were cemented. There was one recurrence of infection. The mean VAS pain score was 2.73, also 4 patients felt no pain at all. The average functional score on the WOMAC scale was 36.4 (14–60) and for the Oxford Knee Score was 26.5 (15–41). Each patient achieved an independent gait. All patients reported the necessity of use of crutches outside home. The average limb shortening was 2.05 cm (0.5–3.0). In addition, 14 of the 15 patients positively evaluated the procedure results and if they had to, they would again decide on this form of treatment. During follow-up, no complication or problems with implants used were observed. Conclusions. Knee arthrodesis with modular nail offers an acceptable functional result and gives a chance of salvaging a limb in complex septic complications of TKA.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (01) ◽  
pp. 013-016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Churchill ◽  
Anton Khlopas ◽  
Assem Sultan ◽  
Steven Harwin ◽  
Michael Mont

AbstractProper femoral component alignment in the axial plane during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depends on accurate bone cuts and soft tissue balancing. Two methods that are used to achieve this are “measured resection” and “gap balancing.” However, a controversy exists as to which method is more accurate and leads to better outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate: (1) implant survivorship, (2) patient outcomes, (3) complications, and (4) radiographic analysis comparing patients who underwent TKA with either gap-balancing or measured resection techniques. A total of 214 consecutive patients (221 knees) underwent primary TKA by a single surgeon between 2011 and 2012. Component alignment was achieved by using measured resection in 116 knees and gap balancing was used in 105 knees. The patients had a mean age of 66 years (range, 44–86 years) and a mean body mass index of 32 kg/m2 (range, 22–52 kg/m2). Patient range-of-motion (ROM) and Knee Society (KS) function and pain scores, and radiographic assessment, were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at ∼6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, and then annually. The mean follow-up time was 3 years. A Kaplan–Meier's analysis was performed to calculate the survivorship. The aseptic survivorship was 98% in both the measured resection and gap-balancing groups. The mean ROM was not significantly different between the measured resection and gap-balancing groups (123 vs. 123 degrees, p = 0.990). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the KS function scores (86 vs. 85 points, p = 0.829) or the KS pain scores (93 vs. 92 points, p = 0.425). Otherwise, the radiographic evaluation at latest follow-up did not demonstrate any evidence of progressive radiolucencies or loosening, of any prosthesis. The results of this study found that at a mean follow-up of 3 years, both the measured resection and gap-balancing techniques achieved excellent survivorship and postoperative outcomes. This demonstrates that both methods can be used to achieve accurate femoral component alignment with similar short-term outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document