scholarly journals Intraoperative evaluation of the effects of femoral component offset and head size on joint stability in total hip arthroplasty

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949901668429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Jinno ◽  
Daisuke Koga ◽  
Yoshinori Asou ◽  
Sadao Morita ◽  
Atsushi Okawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Head Size ◽  
Joint Stability ◽  
Femoral Offset ◽  
Stability Range ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Hip Flexion

Purpose: To evaluate intraoperatively the effects of femoral offset and head size on stability of the hip joints in total hip arthroplasty (THA) via posterior approach. Methods: Thirty cementless THAs were included in this study. After acetabular shell and femoral broach fixation, trial reduction was repeated using a femoral neck (5- to 8-mm higher or standard offset) and a head (26 mm or 32 mm). To evaluate joint stability, range of internal rotation (IR) in hip flexion prior to posterior subluxation and range of external rotation (ER) in hip extension were measured. Results: The high-offset neck provided significantly (approximately 10°) greater range of IR to subluxation than the standard-offset neck. No hips ended in anterior subluxation by ER. The head size did not have significant effects on the stability. Conclusion: Results suggest that the 5- to 8-mm greater femoral offset might be effective in preventing instability in primary THA.

scholarly journals Comparison of short-term outcomes of anterolateral supine approach and posterolateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taku Ukai ◽  
Goro Ebihara ◽  
Masahiko Watanabe
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Posterolateral Approach ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Hip Flexion ◽  
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract Background This study aims to evaluate postoperative pain and functional and clinical outcomes of anterolateral supine (ALS) and posterolateral (PL) approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty. Materials and methods We retrospectively examined the joints of 110 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The ALS group was compared with the PL group using the pain visual analog scale (VAS) and narcotic consumption as pain outcomes. Functional outcomes included postoperative range of motion (ROM) of hip flexion, day on which patients could perform straight leg raising (SLR), day on which patients began using a walker or cane, duration of hospital stay, rate of transfer, and strength of hip muscles. Clinical outcomes included pre and postoperative Harris Hip Scores. Results No significant differences were found in the pain VAS scores or narcotic consumption between the two groups. The PL group could perform SLR earlier than the ALS group (P < 0.01). The ALS group started using a cane earlier (P < 0.01) and had a shorter hospital stay (P < 0.01) than the PL group. Degrees of active ROM of flexion at postoperative day (POD) 1 were significantly lower in the ALS group than in the PL group (P < 0.01). Regarding hip muscle strength, hip flexion was significantly weaker in the ALS group than in the PL group until 1-month POD (P < 0.01). External rotation from 2 weeks to 6 months postoperatively was significantly weaker in the PL group than in the ALS group (P < 0.01). Conclusion The ALS approach was more beneficial than the PL approach because ALS enabled better functional recovery of the strength of external rotation, improved rehabilitation, and involved a shorter hospital stay. Level of Evidence Level IV retrospective observational study.

Effects of the Femoral Offset and the Head Size on the Safe Range of Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 646-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akinobu Matsushita ◽  
Yasuharu Nakashima ◽  
Seiya Jingushi ◽  
Takuaki Yamamoto ◽  
Akio Kuraoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Head Size ◽  
Femoral Offset ◽  
Total Hip

scholarly journals Value of 3D Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Biplanar Weightbearing Radiographs

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Knafo ◽  
F. Houfani ◽  
B. Zaharia ◽  
F. Egrise ◽  
I. Clerc-Urmès ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Femoral Offset ◽  
Postoperative Result ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Planning Software ◽  
Navigated Surgery

Two-dimensional (2D) planning on standard radiographs for total hip arthroplasty may not be sufficiently accurate to predict implant sizing or restore leg length and femoral offset, whereas 3D planning avoids magnification and projection errors. Furthermore, weightbearing measures are not available with computed tomography (CT) and leg length and offset are rarely checked postoperatively using any imaging modality. Navigation can usually achieve a surgical plan precisely, but the choice of that plan remains key, which is best guided by preoperative planning. The study objectives were therefore to (1) evaluate the accuracy of stem/cup size prediction using dedicated 3D planning software based on biplanar radiographic imaging under weightbearing and (2) compare the preplanned leg length and femoral offset with the postoperative result. This single-centre, single-surgeon prospective study consisted of a cohort of 33 patients operated on over 24 months. The routine clinical workflow consisted of preoperative biplanar weightbearing imaging, 3D surgical planning, navigated surgery to execute the plan, and postoperative biplanar imaging to verify the radiological outcomes in 3D weightbearing. 3D planning was performed with the dedicated hipEOS® planning software to determine stem and cup size and position, plus 3D anatomical and functional parameters, in particular variations in leg length and femoral offset. Component size planning accuracy was 94% (31/33) within one size for the femoral stem and 100% (33/33) within one size for the acetabular cup. There were no significant differences between planned versus implanted femoral stem size or planned versus measured changes in leg length or offset. Cup size did differ significantly, tending towards implanting one size larger when there was a difference. Biplanar radiographs plus hipEOS planning software showed good reliability for predicting implant size, leg length, and femoral offset and postoperatively provided a check on the navigated surgery. Compared to previous studies, the predictive results were better than 2D planning on conventional radiography and equal to 3D planning on CT images, with lower radiation dose, and in the weightbearing position.

scholarly journals Persisting inter‐limb differences in patients following total hip arthroplasty four to five years after surgery? A preliminary cross‐sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie John ◽  
David Weizel ◽  
Anna S. Heumann ◽  
Anja Fischer ◽  
Katja Orlowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Hip Strength ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Hip Flexion

Abstract Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective procedure for patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. However, whether or not pre-operatively existing functional deficits are persisting several years post-surgery in the affected limb has not been thoroughly researched. Therefore, the primary aim of this preliminary study was to include patients four to five years after undergoing THA and to investigate potential differences between the operated and non-operated leg in hip strength, range of motion (ROM), balance, and gait. The secondary aim was to compare these values from the operated leg of the patients to those of the legs of healthy subjects. Methods Sixteen patients (age: 65.20 ± 5.32 years) following unilateral THA (post-operation time: 4.7 ± 0.7 years) and ten, healthy, age-matched control subjects (age: 60.85 ± 7.57 years) were examined for maximum isometric hip muscle strength, active ROM of the hip joint, balance and gait on both limbs. Paired t-tests were used to assess the inter-limb differences in the THA group. Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were performed to compare groups, using age as a covariate. Results The analysis of inter-limb differences in patients following THA revealed significant deficits on the operated side for hip abduction strength (p = 0.02), for hip flexion ROM (p < 0.01) and for balance in terms of the length of center of pressure (COP) (p = 0.04). Compared to values of the control subjects, the patients demonstrated significantly reduced hip strength in flexion, extension and abduction (p < 0.05) on the operated leg as well as reduced ROM measures in hip flexion, extension and abduction (p < 0.05). Conclusions The first results of this explorative study indicated that inter-limb differences as well as reduced hip strength and hip ROM compared with control subjects were still present four to five years after THA. These persisting asymmetries and deficits in patients following THA may be one explanation for the decrease in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) seen in patients over the years after surgery. Further studies are required to replicate these findings with a larger sample size. Trial registration DRKS, DRKS00016945. Registered 12 March 2019 – Retrospectively registered,

Can spinopelvic mobility be predicted in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty?

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (8) ◽  
pp. 902-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Innmann ◽  
C. Merle ◽  
T. Gotterbarm ◽  
V. Ewerbeck ◽  
P. E. Beaulé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Sacral Slope ◽  
Sitting Position ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Hip Flexion

Aims This study of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip aimed to: 1) characterize the contribution of the hip, spinopelvic complex, and lumbar spine when moving from the standing to the sitting position; 2) assess whether abnormal spinopelvic mobility is associated with worse symptoms; and 3) identify whether spinopelvic mobility can be predicted from static anatomical radiological parameters. Patients and Methods A total of 122 patients with end-stage OA of the hip awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA) were prospectively studied. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; Oxford Hip Score, Oswestry Disability Index, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Score) and clinical data were collected. Sagittal spinopelvic mobility was calculated as the change from the standing to sitting position using the lumbar lordosis angle (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic-femoral angle (PFA), and acetabular anteinclination (AI) from lateral radiographs. The interaction of the different parameters was assessed. PROMs were compared between patients with normal spinopelvic mobility (10° ≤ ∆PT ≤ 30°) or abnormal spinopelvic mobility (stiff: ∆PT < ± 10°; hypermobile: ∆PT > ± 30°). Multiple regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to test for possible predictors of spinopelvic mobility. Results Standing to sitting, the hip flexed by a mean of 57° (sd 17°), the pelvis tilted backwards by a mean of 20° (sd 12°), and the lumbar spine flexed by a mean of 20° (sd 14°); strong correlations were detected. There was no difference in PROMs between patients in the different spinopelvic mobility groups. Maximum hip flexion, standing PT, and standing AI were independent predictors of spinopelvic mobility (R2 = 0.42). The combined thresholds for standing was PT ≥ 13° and hip flexion ≥ 88° in the clinical examination, and had 90% sensitivity and 63% specificity of predicting spinopelvic stiffness, while SS ≥ 42° had 84% sensitivity and 67% specificity of predicting spinopelvic hypermobility. Conclusion The hip, on average, accounts for three-quarters of the standing-to-sitting movement, but there is great variation. Abnormal spinopelvic mobility cannot be screened with PROMs. However, clinical and standing radiological features can predict spinopelvic mobility with good enough accuracy, allowing them to be used as reliable screening tools. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:902–909.

Plain Radiographs Fail to Reflect Femoral Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1661-1665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Weber ◽  
Michael L. Woerner ◽  
Hans-Robert Springorum ◽  
Alexander Hapfelmeier ◽  
Joachim Grifka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Offset ◽  
Plain Radiographs ◽  
Total Hip

Is There a Benefit to Head Size Greater Than 36 mm in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan D. Haughom ◽  
Darren R. Plummer ◽  
Mario Moric ◽  
Craig J. Della Valle
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Head Size ◽  
Total Hip

Femoral head material loss at the head-neck junction in total hip arthroplasty: the effect of head size, stem material and stem offset

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 647-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Valente ◽  
Brent Lanting ◽  
Steven MacDonald ◽  
Matthew G Teeter ◽  
Douglas Van Citters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Head Size ◽  
Material Loss ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Femoral Heads ◽  
Measuring Machine ◽  
Head Neck ◽  
Neck Junction

Introduction:Material loss at the head-neck junction in total hip arthroplasty may cause adverse clinical symptoms and implant failure. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively examine the effects of head size, stem material and stem offset on material loss of the head-neck taper interface of a single trunnion design in retrieval implants of metal on polyethylene bearing surfaces.Methods:A retrieval study was performed to identify all 28-mm and 32-mm femoral heads from a single implant/taper design implanted for >2 years. This included n = 56 of the 28-mm heads and n = 23 of the 32-mm heads. The 28-mm femoral heads were matched to 32-mm femoral heads based on time in vivo and head length. A coordinate measuring machine was used to determine maximum linear corrosion depth (MLD). Differences in MLD for head diameter, stem material, and stem offset were determined.Results:There were no differences between groups for age, gender, BMI, or implantation time. There was no difference in MLD between 28 mm and 32 mm matched paired head diameters ( p = 0.59). There was also no difference in MLD between titanium or cobalt-chromium stems ( p = 0.79), and regular or high-offset stems ( p = 0.95).Conclusion:There is no statistical difference in femoral head MLD at the head-neck junction in THA between 28-mm and 32-mm matched paired femoral heads, similar or mixed alloy coupled femoral head stem constructs, and regular or high offset stems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document