scholarly journals Arthroscopic knotless single-row repair preserving full footprint versus tear completion repair for partial articular-sided rotator cuff tear

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949901877089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cen Tao Liu ◽  
Heng an Ge ◽  
Rui Hu ◽  
Jing Biao Huang ◽  
Yi Chao Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Single Row ◽  
Repair Technique ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: The comparison of clinical outcomes of arthroscopic footprint-preserving knotless single-row repair with the tear completion repair technique for articular-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) remains unclear. Methods: A total of 68 patients diagnosed with articular-sided PTRCTs who underwent rotator cuff repair between December 2014 and June 2015 were included. Of the 68 patients, 30 received footprint-preserving knotless single-row repair (group 1) and 38 received the tear completion repair technique (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative assessments were compared. Results: Both groups had significantly improved American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores (group 1: 48.2 preoperatively to 81.9 postoperatively, p < 0.001; group 2: 47.1 preoperatively to 84.9 postoperatively, p < 0.001) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (group 1: 6.0 preoperatively to 0.93 postoperatively, p < 0.001; group 2: 6.1 preoperatively to 1.1 postoperatively, p < 0.001), showing that the two procedures significantly improved postoperative shoulder function. No significant differences were shown in ASES score or VAS pain score between the two groups ( p > 0.05). The mean operation time was significantly shorter in group 1 with an average of 48.1 min than in group 2 with an average of 60.4 min ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: Footprint-preserving knotless single-row repair obtains similar clinical results compared to tear completion repair in the treatment of articular-sided PTRCTs. Footprint-preserving knotless single-row repair may be a convenient choice for the treatment of articular-sided PTRCTs. Randomized controlled studies are needed to investigate whether the footprint-preserving knotless single-row repair yields better long-term outcomes through the protection of the bursal cuff and restoration of the healthy footprint.

Equivalent Clinical Results of Arthroscopic Single-Row and Double-Row Suture Anchor Repair for Rotator Cuff Tears

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1254-1260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Franceschi ◽  
Laura Ruzzini ◽  
Umile Giuseppe Longo ◽  
Francesca Maria Martina ◽  
Bruno Beomonte Zobel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Single Row ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Repair Group ◽  
Group 1

Background Restoring the anatomical footprint may improve the healing and mechanical strength of repaired tendons. A double row of suture anchors increases the tendon-bone contact area, reconstituting a more anatomical configuration of the rotator cuff footprint. Hypothesis There is no difference in clinical and imaging outcome between single-row and double-row suture anchor technique repairs of rotator cuff tears. Study Design Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods The authors recruited 60 patients. In 30 patients, rotator cuff repair was performed with a single-row suture anchor technique (group 1). In the other 30 patients, rotator cuff repair was performed with a double-row suture anchor technique (group 2). Results Eight patients (4 in the single-row anchor repair group and 4 in the double-row anchor repair group) did not return at the final follow-up. At the 2-year follow-up, no statistically significant differences were seen with respect to the University of California, Los Angeles score and range of motion values. At 2-year follow-up, postoperative magnetic resonance arthrography in group 1 showed intact tendons in 14 patients, partial-thickness defects in 10 patients, and full-thickness defects in 2 patients. In group 2, magnetic resonance arthrography showed an intact rotator cuff in 18 patients, partial-thickness defects in 7 patients, and full-thickness defects in 1 patient. Conclusion Single- and double-row techniques provide comparable clinical outcome at 2 years. A double-row technique produces a mechanically superior construct compared with the single-row method in restoring the anatomical footprint of the rotator cuff, but these mechanical advantages do not translate into superior clinical performance.

scholarly journals What is the relationship with rotator cuff tear size of the double row suture bridge transosseous equivalent repair technique?

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0005
Author(s):  
Hakan Tırın ◽  
Murat Gülçek
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tear ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Cuff Tear ◽  
Repair Technique ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Double Row Repair ◽  
Group 1

Background: Rotator cuff tears have an adverse effect on daily activities in personal disability and functional restriction. A few clinical studies have demonstrated the structural superiority of the double row technique. The aim of our study 3 cm below and the top of the rotator cuff tears and a double row repair technique with the results of the retrospectively our patients treated by comparing the results of double row repair techniques to understand the relationship between the tear size. Methods: In this retrospective study, and the data of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the years 2011-2014 were scanned as a single center. Inclusion criteria:1)3 cm above and below the rotator cuff tear preoperative identified by MRI imaging and confirmed by arthroscopy,2)which is operated by a double row repair techniques 3)do not benefit from conservative treatment 4)before patients are no operation history. Exclusion criteria: 1)partial tears, 2)irrepereabl tears, 3)arthritis in the shoulder x-ray, 4)are the follow-up of the patients over 2 years ago. In our study, patients under 3 cm (small and medium) and 3 cm above (large and massive) as we group. Tears under 3 cm was named as group 1, 3 cm above the tears were classified as group 2. 33 patients in group 1, 31 patients group 2 were classified. The patients preoperatively, postoperatively at 6 months, 12 months and finally at 24 months VAS scores, joint ROMs, Constant and UCLA scores were evaluated. At the end of 2 years, patients MRI taken as a result of rupture rates and functional outcomes were compared. Results: Between the groups; age, sex, side, AC joint pathology and the dominant limb with respect was found that no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). According to MRI results rupture rate of 33.3% in group 1, group 2 was found to be 19.4%. The comparison between groups; Constant score at all measurement values were found to be statistically significant difference (p<0.05). 3 cm below the rotator cuff tear time of four measurements was found to be higher than the constant score. The comparison between groups; VAS and UCLA scores in all measured time was found that no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Conclusions: Double row repair technique is a safe surgical technique that can be applied regardless of the size of the tear. 3 cm above the rotator cuff tear in functional outcomes are worse, rupture rate is higher.

scholarly journals Atelocollagen Injection Improves Tendon Integrity in Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Comparative Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596712090401
Author(s):  
Jong-Ho Kim ◽  
Dong-Jin Kim ◽  
Hyo-Jin Lee ◽  
Baek-Kyu Kim ◽  
Yang-Soo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Type I ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Partial Thickness ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Ongoing controversy surrounds the best treatment modality for partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Purpose: To investigate the effects of atelocollagen injection in patients with small, symptomatic, intratendinous rotator cuff tears. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: From January 2014 to December 2017, 94 patients who had small, symptomatic, intratendinous rotator cuff tears were enrolled and randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups: intratendinous injection with 0.5 mL of type I atelocollagen (group 1, n = 32), intratendinous injection with 1 mL of type I atelocollagen (group 2, n = 30), and no injection of type I atelocollagen (group 3, n = 32). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant Shoulder Score, visual analog scale pain score, and range of motion were evaluated before injection; at 3, 6, and 12 months after injection; and at final follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at least 6 months after injection to evaluate rotator cuff integrity. Results: Demographic data did not differ significantly among the 3 groups before injection ( P > .05). The mean follow-up period was 24.7 months. The functional and pain scores in groups 1 and 2 were significantly improved at final follow-up ( P < .05). No significant improvement was seen in functional or pain scores at final follow-up in group 3 ( P > .05). Groups 1 and 2 had significantly better functional scores compared with group 3 at final follow-up ( P < .05). The proportion of patients with a decrease in size of the torn tendon on follow-up MRI at least 6 months after atelocollagen injection was significantly higher in group 1 (28.1%; P = .02) and group 2 (36.7%; P = .003) compared with group 3 (6.3%). Conclusion: Atelocollagen injection can improve the functional outcome and integrity of the tendon in intratendinous rotator cuff tears.

scholarly journals Patients >40 years with a glenohumeral dislocation have a lower incidence of Symptomatic Rotator Cuff Tear than previously reported and can be managed safely without routine advanced imaging

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chibuzo Manafa ◽  
Ahmed Barakat ◽  
Felicity Auld ◽  
Joideep Phadnis
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Advanced Imaging ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Over 40 Years ◽  
Glenohumeral Dislocation ◽  
Selective Referral ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background Incidence of rotator cuff tears (RCT) following primary anterior glenohumeral dislocation in patients over 40 years is thought to be high. Current guidelines recommend specialist clinic review and advanced imaging for all patients. The aim of this study was to report the incidence of symptomatic RCT in a large cohort of patients and to assess the safety and efficacy of a physiotherapy led virtual protocol where patients were selectively investigated and treated based on symptoms. Methods 238 consecutive patients over 40 years of age with a primary anterior glenohumeral dislocation were identified between January 2015 and June 2018 (42 months). All patients were managed initially through a physiotherapy led virtual clinic with selective referral of patients with red flag symptoms to a specialist shoulder clinic. Advanced imaging (MRI or USS) was performed at the discretion of the shoulder specialist following patient assessment. The incidence of symptomatic RCT was assessed and compared between two groups (Group 1: 40-70 years, Group 2: >70 years). All surgical interventions were recorded. Patients were assessed at a mean of 22 months (range 10-54) using the Oxford shoulder score; patient satisfaction and return to pre-injury functional level. Cost analysis was performed to compare management using this protocol versus published guidelines.Results A total of 238 patients were identified with mean age of 65 years (range 40-96). 69% (n=164/238) were symptomatic and were referred to specialist clinic. The other 31% (n=74/238) were asymptomatic and were discharged to physiotherapy. Of those referred to a specialist clinic, only 46% (n=75/164) were sent for advanced imaging following clinical examination. The incidence of symptomatic RCTs was 31% (n=51/164) in this group and only 22% (n=11/51) of those underwent subsequent surgical repair of their rotator cuff. Of those patients discharged to physiotherapy, 62% (n=47/74) responded to the questionnaire with 89% fully satisfied, 85% returned to pre-injury level and mean Oxford score was 42 (33-38, SD 3.2) indicating excellent shoulder function. With all patients pooled excluding those lost to follow-up (n=27), the incidence of symptomatic RCTs was 24% (51/211). The incidence in group 1 was 16% (n=22/137) and was significantly lower than in group 2 which was 39% (n=29/74) (p<0.05). Cost analysis demonstrated 49% cost reduction using this protocol.Conclusion Incidence of symptomatic cuff tears following a primary glenohumeral dislocation in patients over 40 years was lower than previously reported. A protocol based on selective referral and investigation for symptomatic patients was cost effective and safe.

scholarly journals Treatment With Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β Inhibitor Decreases Apoptotic and Autophagic Reactions in Rat Rotator Cuff Tears

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712110607
Author(s):  
Yang-Soo Kim ◽  
Yun-Gyoung Lee ◽  
Min-Tae Kim ◽  
Hyo-Jin Lee
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Glycogen Synthase ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Cuff Tear ◽  
Partial Thickness ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Gsk 3Β ◽  
Group 1

Background: Apoptosis and autophagy are known to be correlated with the extent of damage in torn rotator cuffs, and there is no biological evidence for self-recovery or healing of the rotator cuff tear. Purpose: To establish in a rat model of partial- and full-thickness rotator cuff tears how a glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) inhibitor affects the expression of apoptotic and autophagic markers. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twelve-week-old Sprague Dawley rats were divided into 3 groups (n = 16 per group). Group 1 acted as the control, with no treatment; group 2 received partial-thickness (right side) and full-thickness (left side) rotator cuff tears only; and group 3 received the same rotator cuff injuries, with GSK-3β inhibitor injected afterward. The tendons from each group were harvested 42 days after surgery. Evaluation of gene expression, immunohistochemistry, and TUNEL staining (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP nick end labeling) were performed for the following markers: caspases 3, 8, and 9 as well as Bcl-2 (B-cell lymphoma 2); BAX (Bcl-2-associated X protein); beclin 1; p53; and GSK-3β; which represented apoptotic and autophagic reactions. Statistical analysis was performed using 1-way analysis of variance. Results: In the group 2 rats with partial- and full-thickness tears, there were significant increases in the mRNA levels (fold changes) of all 8 markers as compared with group 1 (control). All these increased markers showed significant downregulation by the GSK-3β inhibitor in partial-thickness tears. However, the response to the GSK-3β inhibitor in full-thickness tears was not as prominent as in partial-thickness tears. The number of TUNEL-positive cells in group 2 (partial, 35.08% ± 1.625% [mean ± SE]; full, 46.92% ± 1.319%) was significantly higher than in group 1 (18.02% ± 1.036%; P < .01) and group 3 (partial, 28.04% ± 2.607% [ P < .01]; full, 38.97% ± 2.772% [ P < .01]), and immunohistochemistry revealed increased expression of all the markers in group 2 as compared with control. Conclusion: The apoptotic and autophagic activity induced in a rat model of an acute rotator cuff tear was downregulated after treatment with a GSK-3β inhibitor, particularly with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Clinical Relevance: A GSK-3β inhibitor may be able to modulate deterioration in a torn rotator cuff.

Does Arthroscopic Suture-Spanning Augmentation of Single-Row Repair Reduce the Retear Rate of Massive Rotator Cuff Tear?

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1420-1426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsuan-Hsiao Ma ◽  
Kun-Hui Chen ◽  
En-Rung Chiang ◽  
Te-Feng Arthur Chou ◽  
Hsiao-Li Ma
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Single Row ◽  
Repair Technique ◽  
Retear Rate

Background: Several surgical techniques have been proposed for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs), but the failure rates remain high. The suture-spanning augmentation technique of single-row (SSA-SR) repair was shown to reduce failure rates in cadaveric studies, but the outcome in vivo remains unclear. Purpose: To determine if adding spanning sutures to SR repair during MRCT repairs can improve functional outcome and reduce failure rates. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The study included 71 patients with a diagnosed MRCT. The study group (n = 35) received SSA-SR repair. The control (n = 36) received SR repair. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) score, and visual analog scale for pain were assessed preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging was arranged at 6 months postoperatively to evaluate the rotator cuff. Results: At 6 months postoperatively, the overall retear rate was 31.0%. The retear rate was lower in the SSA-SR group (14.3%) than in the SR group (47.2%, P = .002). At 24 months, the SSA-SR group had markedly improved ASES, Constant, and UCLA scores in comparison with the SR group ( P < .05). Within both groups, all scores had significant improvement as compared with the preoperative status ( P < .05). Conclusion: The SSA-SR repair technique showed improved functional and radiologic results. Based on the superior postoperative outcome of this technique, the SSA-SR repair technique can be a potential treatment option for MRCT repair. Registration: NCT03609164 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

When Should We Repair Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears? Outcome Comparison Between Immediate Surgical Repair Versus Delayed Repair After 6-Month Period of Nonsurgical Treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1091-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang-Soo Kim ◽  
Hyo-Jin Lee ◽  
Jong-Ho Kim ◽  
Dong-Young Noh
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Delayed Repair ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Repair Group ◽  
Group 1

Background: Patients with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) can be treated nonoperatively and/or undergo operative treatment, but the ideal time for surgical intervention is unclear. Purpose: To compare the results of immediate arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with repair after 6 months of nonoperative care of PTRCTs involving more than 50% of the tendon thickness. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The authors prospectively randomized and analyzed 78 consecutive patients diagnosed with either isolated bursal-side or articular-side PTRCTs (supraspinatus only). Group 1 (n = 44) received immediate rotator cuff repair. Group 2 (n = 34) received delayed rotator cuff repair after 6 months of nonoperative treatment. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, Constant score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and range of motion at initial visit; months 3, 6, and 12 postoperatively; and the last visit after 24 months were used for the evaluation. Cuff integrity was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging at 12 months postoperatively. Results: There were no significant differences in age, sex (18/26 vs 13/21, male/female), symptom duration, composition of PTRCTs, or clinical outcomes between groups 1 and 2 ( P > .05). In group 2, 10 patients voluntarily dropped out from the study due to improvement of symptoms during the 6 months of preoperative nonoperative treatment. The mean follow-up period in groups 1 and 2 was 31.9 ± 1.5 months and 37.0 ± 2.2 months, respectively. At the end of the study, both groups showed significant improvements in terms of functional scores and pain VAS scores compared with the initial period. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups, except for lower pain VAS score and higher ASES Score in group 2 at 6 months postoperatively. At 12 months postoperatively, 1 patient from group 1 and 2 patients from group 2 experienced a retear. Conclusion: Both immediate surgical repair and delayed repair after nonsurgical care for PTRCTs were effective in improving clinical outcomes, and there was a very low incidence of retears in both groups. However, at 6 months postoperatively, superior functional outcomes were observed in the delayed repair group compared with the immediate repair group. A trial period of preoperative nonsurgical care is reasonable, and immediate surgical repair is not crucial for the treatment of PTRCT.

scholarly journals Comparing Clinical Outcomes After Subacromial Spacer Insertion Versus Other Reconstruction Methods in the Treatment of Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 232596711986960
Author(s):  
Joo Han Oh ◽  
Joo Hyun Park ◽  
Hyeon Jang Jeong ◽  
Sung-Min Rhee
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Fatty Degeneration ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Massive Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Reconstruction Methods ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Tear Size ◽  
Group 1

Background: Previous studies on subacromial spacer (SAS) insertion have been limited to case series that did not compare the effectiveness of this technique with other techniques. Hypothesis: Outcomes after SAS insertion for the treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (IMRCTs) will be similar to those of other techniques. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This retrospective study was based on data collected from patients who underwent correction of IMRCTs between January 2010 and October 2017. Group 1 patients (n = 17) received SAS insertion with or without partial repair; group 2 patients (n = 36) were treated with other techniques (isolated partial repairs or bridging grafts). Preoperative tear size and global fatty degeneration index values were evaluated. Range of motion, visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and acromiohumeral distance (AHD) were assessed preoperatively and at final follow-up at least 2 years after the surgery (range, 24-60 months). In both groups, ultrasonographic examination was performed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at 1 year. Results: Tear size and preoperative global fatty degeneration index were not significantly different between the groups (all P > .05). There were no differences in functional scores between the groups at final follow-up (all P > .05). AHD was maintained at final follow-up in group 1 (mean ± SD: 6.2 ± 2.1 mm [postoperatively] vs 6.7 ± 2.3 mm [final follow-up]; P = .678), and there was no difference compared with group 2 (7.2 ± 3.2 mm; P = .244). Patients with retears in group 2 (23 of 36, 63.9%) had lower ASES ( P = .041) and SST ( P = .027) scores at final follow-up when compared with patients in group 1. Six patients (35.3%) in group 1 had partial repairs; these patients had better external rotation at 90° ( P = .047), better SST scores ( P = .036), and higher AHDs at final follow-up ( P = .046) than those in group 1 who had no repair. Three patients (50%) showed retears of partially repaired tendons on MRI. Of 13 patients (76.5%) in group 1 with postoperative MRI, 12 (92.3%) showed fibrotic tissue in the subacromial space not seen preoperatively. Conclusion: There was no difference in outcomes between SAS and the other reconstruction methods for treating IMRCTs. However, given the high retear rate associated with other techniques and poor functional outcomes after retear, SAS insertion could be a viable option for treating IMRCTs.

Clinical Relevance of Classifying Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Results Based on Functional and Radiological Findings After Arthroscopic Repair

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Soo Ok ◽  
Byung Guk Kim ◽  
Won Chul Choi ◽  
Chul Gie Hong ◽  
Jee Woong Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Arthroscopic Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Massive Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Tear Size ◽  
Retear Rate ◽  
Group 1

Background: Studies on the results of arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears have reported widely varied prognoses. Among other factors, the sizable discrepancy can be attributable to the fact that the current definition of massive rotator cuff tears covers an extensive area of tendons. Hypothesis: Functional and radiological results according to subgroups would show significant inter-subgroup differences preoperatively and postoperatively. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 104 patients who required arthroscopic repair for massive rotator cuff tears were prospectively evaluated. The patients were allocated into 3 groups according to tendon involvement as diagnosed by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging: group 1 (anterosuperior type involving the subscapularis and supraspinatus), group 2 (posterosuperior type involving the infraspinatus and supraspinatus), and group 3 (anteroposterior type involving the subscapularis, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus). We compared functional results (at 2 years postoperatively) and radiological findings (at 1 year postoperatively) for each group. Results: There were 34 patients in group 1, 54 in group 2, and 16 in group 3. In all 3 groups, functional results significantly improved after surgery. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in functional results among the 3 groups. On the radiological evaluations, each group (groups 1, 2, and 3) showed a significantly different result in the preoperative acromiohumeral distance (AHD) (7.19, 5.44, and 5.22 mm, respectively), tear size (38.8, 39.3, and 46.4 mm, respectively), extent of retraction (33.9, 40.0, and 41.4 mm, respectively), postoperative AHD (8.92, 7.37, and 6.71 mm, respectively), and retear rate (23.5%, 51.9%, and 56.2%, respectively) ( P < .001 for all). Conclusion: Massive rotator cuff tears can be divided into 3 types: anterosuperior (group 1), posterosuperior (group 2), and anteroposterior (group 3). Each group has distinctive characteristics and shows different results in the preoperative AHD, tear size, extent of retraction, postoperative AHD, and retear rate, which provide a reasonable basis for categorization. So far, massive rotator cuff tears have only been broadly defined, consequently being understood as a single category by many. However, to clearly understand and evaluate this injury, we suggest identifying differences within the category through proper subclassification.

scholarly journals How do massive immobile rotator cuff tears behave after arthroscopic interval slides? Comparison with mobile tears

Joints ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 66-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Fossati ◽  
Paolo Arrigoni ◽  
Vincenza Ragone ◽  
Pietro Spennacchio ◽  
Giuseppe Banfi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Arthroscopic Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Massive Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Purpose: the aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of contracted immobile massive rotator cuff tears mobilised through an arthroscopic interval slide technique versus massive mobile cuff tears directly repaired without any mobilisation. Methods: twenty-five patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for massive rotator cuff tears with a minimum of 18 months follow-up were included. The patients were retrospectively divided into two groups. In group 1, a single or double interval slide was performed to achieve adequate tendon mobilisation. In group 2 (control group), massive rotator cuff tears were arthroscopically repaired without any additional release. Patients were evaluated with validated outcomes scores: subjective and objective Constant score, a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). Results: the two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender and involvement of the dominant arm. The mean follow-up duration was 31 months in group 1 and 28 months in group 2 (p = 0.4). The two groups showed no significant differences in SANE and VAS results (group 1: SANE 77%, VAS 1.3; group 2: SANE 88%, VAS 1.6), or in total Constant score (group1: 66.5 ± 11; group 2: 75 ± 14; p = 0.1) and subjective Constant score (Group 1: 31 ± 5; group 2: 30.8 ± 7; p = 0.9). A significant difference was found for the objective Constant score, which was higher in the control group (group 1: 35.5 ± 7; group 2: 44 ± 8; p = 0.009). Conclusions: Subjective clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair with or without interval slides did not differ and were satisfactory. Objectively, immobile cuff tears showed inferior results.The use of interval slides might be considered a first step or an alternative to more invasive procedures for low demanding patients. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document