scholarly journals Comparison of intramedullary nailing fixation and percutaneous locked plating fixation for the treatment of proximal tibial fractures: A meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949902110243
Author(s):  
Cheng Ren ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
Liang Sun ◽  
Zhong Li ◽  
Yibo Xu ◽  
...  

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to systematically compare the clinical outcomes of intramedullary nailing (IMN) fixation and percutaneous locked plating (PLP) fixation in the treatment of proximal tibial fractures. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and Wan Fang to select relevant articles up to March 29, 2020 without language limit. Continuous variables were estimated by weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and dichotomous outcomes were calculated by relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. Moreover, heterogeneity analysis was evaluated. Furthermore, publication bias assessment and sensitivity analysis were conducted. Stata 11.0 software was used to perform the statistical analysis. Results: Ten studies involving 667 cases (321 from IMN fixation group and 346 from PLP fixation group) were included. The type of fractures involved in the included articles was extra-articular proximal tibia fractures. IMN fixation method achieved significantly shorter union time ( WMD = −2.88, 95% CI: −3.23 to −2.53, p < 0.001) and full weight-bearing time ( WMD = −2.81, 95% CI: −3.64 to −1.97, p < 0.001) than PLP fixation method. Meanwhile, IMN fixation resulted in lower risks of infection ( RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.91, p = 0.02) and total complications ( RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.60, p < 0.001) than PLP fixation. No significant differences were found in the incidence of nonunion ( p = 0.33), malunion ( p = 0.38), and osteofascial compartment syndrome (OCS, p = 0.62) between the two groups. Conclusions: Compared to PLP fixation, IMN fixation had several advantages in treating proximal tibial fractures, including the short time of union and full weight-bearing, as well as a low risk of infection and total complications.

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 485-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Lindvall ◽  
Roy Sanders ◽  
Thomas DiPasquale ◽  
Dolfi Herscovici ◽  
George Haidukewych ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Li ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Yao Lu ◽  
Zhong Li ◽  
Kun Zhang

Abstract Objective: To compare the traditional approach of intramedullary nail with an extra plate versus the nail combined with blocking screws for proximal tibia fractures without the knee involved.Methods: From January 2013 to January 2017, a total of 36 patients who suffered from proximal tibial fractures unaffecting the knee were enrolled into this prospective study, and divided into two groups by random number table method. Of them, 19 patients received an interlocking intramedullary nail combined with an extra plate for internal fixation of the fractures (the plate group), while the remaining 17 patients had fractures fixed with the nail combined with blocking screws (the screw group). The perioperative, follow-up and radiographic data were compared between the two groups.Results: All the 36 patients underwent operation smoothly without iatrogenic neurovascular injuries. The plate group proved superior the screw group regarding to operation time and intraoperative X-ray exposure (P<0.05) , nevertheless the former was inferior to the latter in implant cost and hospital stay (P<0.05) . The follow-up period lasted for 12~24 months with a mean of (15.62±4.71) months. There were no statistically significant differences in the time to return ambulation and the time to full weight-bearing activity between the two groups (P>0.05) . At the latest follow up, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding knee range of motion and Johner-Wruhs grades for clinical consequences (P>0.05) . In terms of anterior knee pain, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05) . In respect of radiographic assessment, the plate group had significantly less residual malalignment than the screw group, including anteroposterior and lateral displacements, as well as angulations in coronal and sagittal planes (P<0.05) . To the latest follow up, all patients in both group got bony healing of the fractures without a statistical difference in fracture healing time between them (P>0.05) , and no loosening or breaking of the implants were showed on images in anyone of them.Conclusion: Both the nail plus plate and nail plus blocking screw do achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes for proximal tibial fractures unaffecting the knee. By comparison, the nail combined with plate facilitates to regain and maintain better alignment of the leg regardless of higher implant cost.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie li ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Zhong Li ◽  
Kun Zhang

Abstract Objective: To compare the traditional approach of intramedullary nail with an extra plate versus the nail combined with blocking screws for proximal tibia fractures without the knee involved. Methods: From January 2013 to January 2017, a total of 36 patients who suffered from proximal tibial fractures unaffecting the knee were enrolled into this prospective study, and divided into two groups by random number table method. Of them, 19 patients received an interlocking intramedullary nail combined with an extra plate for internal fixation of the fractures (the plate group), while the remaining 17 patients had fractures fixed with the nail combined with blocking screws (the screw group). The perioperative, follow-up and radiographic data were compared between the two groups. Results: All the 36 patients underwent operation smoothly without iatrogenic neurovascular injuries. The plate group proved superior the screw group regarding to operation time and intraoperative X-ray exposure (P<0.05) , nevertheless the former was inferior to the latter in implant cost and hospital stay (P<0.05) . The follow-up period lasted for 12~24 months with a mean of (15.62±4.71) months. There were no statistically significant differences in the time to return ambulation and the time to full weight-bearing activity between the two groups (P>0.05) . At the latest follow up, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding knee range of motion and Johner-Wruhs grades for clinical consequences (P>0.05) . In terms of anterior knee pain, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05) . In respect of radiographic assessment, the plate group had significantly less residual malalignment than the screw group, including anteroposterior and lateral displacements, as well as angulations in coronal and sagittal planes (P<0.05) . To the latest follow up, all patients in both group got bony healing of the fractures without a statistical difference in fracture healing time between them (P>0.05) , and no loosening or breaking of the implants were showed on images in anyone of them. Conclusion: Both the nail plus plate and nail plus blocking screw do achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes for proximal tibial fractures unaffecting the knee. By comparison, the nail combined with plate facilitates to regain and maintain better alignment of the leg regardless of higher implant cost.


2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil G Kulkarni ◽  
Ankit Varshneya ◽  
Shreenath Kulkarni ◽  
Govind S Kulkarni ◽  
Milind G Kulkarni ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-71
Author(s):  
Kawalkar Abhijit Chandrakant ◽  
Badole Chandrashekher Martand

Introduction Tibia fractures are the most common long bone fractures encountered by the orthopedic surgeons and distal tibia fractures have the second highest incidence of all tibia fractures after the middle third of tibia the distal tibial fractures are unique and are considered as most challenging fractures to treat due to its proximity to the ankle joint and its superficial nature. The objective of this study is to compare two osteosynthesis systems developed for surgical treatment of distal tibia fractures: the intramedullary nailing and the MIPPO technique. Methods The study was conducted between Jan 2011 to Dec 2012. 63 patients with extra-articular distal tibia fracture treated with intramedullary nailing and MIPPO technique were reviewed retrospectively and clinical outcome was evaluated according to American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score. Results 31 patients were treated with intramedullary nail & 32 with MIPPO technique. Fibular fixation was done in cases where fibular fracture was at or below the level of tibial fractures. We found no difference in terms of time for fracture union, mal-union, non-union, duration of surgery and amount of blood loss. But there was significant difference in terms of infection and duration of hospital stay. Also weight bearing was possible much earlier in intramedullary group as compared to the MIPPO group. Conclusion Thus we conclude that intramedullary nailing is better choice of implant in patients with extra- articular distal tibia fractures & helps in early weight bearing and ambulation of patient with fewer complications.


Author(s):  
Shafeed T. P. ◽  
Bijo Paul

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Management of supracondylar fractures is a real challenge to the orthopaedician due to its extensive soft tissue injury, boneloss, comminution, articular extention and instability. Open reduction and internal fixation with anatomical distal femoral locking plate permits early mobilization. Stable anatomical fixation is necessary to avoid complications and disability.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> 25 patients with Type A and Type C closed supracondylar femoral fractures were followed up from November 2013 to November 2015. All the patients underwent ORIF with DF-LCP. Clinical and radiological follow up were recorded for 24 months.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Mean time for fracture union was 4.02 months. Average duration for full weight bearing was 122 days (range 90-180days). The average range of movement for Type A fractures was 105.71 degrees, for C fractures average ROM was 93.64 degrees. Average ROM for patients &lt;50 was 103 degree and for patients&gt;50 ROM was 98.66 degree. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Locked plating of DF fractures permits stable fixation and early mobilization which avoids disability and ensures good joint function.</span></p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izzet Bingol ◽  
Nadir Yalcin ◽  
Vedat Bicici ◽  
Tolga Tulunay ◽  
Kaan Yuksel ◽  
...  

Background : Selection of a treatment method in cases of unstable, nonarticular distal tibial fractures is still a matter of discussion. Intramedullary nailing, which is a “gold standard” for tibial shaft fractures, does not always work for this specific transition area between diaphysis and metaphysis. Instead, new minimally invasive techniques with special implants are popular. Aims : To determine the functional and radiological results of distal tibial fractures treated with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) technique. Study Design : Retrospective cohort analysis. Methods : Thirty distal tibial fractures treated with MIPPO method, between January 2006 and December 2010, were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were classified according to AO/OTA classification. Period of hospital stay, time of fracture union, time to allow full weight bearing, early and late complications were inquired. Functional outcomes were assessed by AOFAS scores. Results : There were 13 male and 17 female patients with an average age of 44.26 (range, 22-77 years). One superficial infection and one malunion were observed. Two patients were revised for the loss of reduction and healed uneventfully. According to the AO/OTA classification, 23 patients were 43-A1 (76.6%), 3 were 43-A2 (10%) and 4 were 43-A3 (13.3%). Post-operative mean stay of patients at the hospital was 2.6 ± 1.42 days (range, 1-7 days). Mean full weight-bearing period of the patients was found out as 13.16 ± 2.6 weeks (range, 10-22 weeks). The mean period of union of fracture for patients was found out as 19.8 ± 2.99 weeks (range, 16-34 weeks). Conclusion : Treatment of distal tibial fractures with MIPPO method provides a successful treatment strategy as long as used as per the technique, and it respects and does not harm soft tissues which allows early callus formation and rapid healing that enable the patient to walk as early as possible after the operation. The overall clinical and functional outcome is still good despite minor complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document