scholarly journals Intramedullary Nailing Combined With Adjunct Plate or Blocking Screw for Proximal Tibial Fractures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie li ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Zhong Li ◽  
Kun Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nail ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Plate Versus ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Plate Group ◽  
Proximal Tibial Fractures ◽  
Screw Group

Abstract Objective: To compare the traditional approach of intramedullary nail with an extra plate versus the nail combined with blocking screws for proximal tibia fractures without the knee involved. Methods: From January 2013 to January 2017, a total of 36 patients who suffered from proximal tibial fractures unaffecting the knee were enrolled into this prospective study, and divided into two groups by random number table method. Of them, 19 patients received an interlocking intramedullary nail combined with an extra plate for internal fixation of the fractures (the plate group), while the remaining 17 patients had fractures fixed with the nail combined with blocking screws (the screw group). The perioperative, follow-up and radiographic data were compared between the two groups. Results: All the 36 patients underwent operation smoothly without iatrogenic neurovascular injuries. The plate group proved superior the screw group regarding to operation time and intraoperative X-ray exposure (P＜0.05) , nevertheless the former was inferior to the latter in implant cost and hospital stay (P＜0.05) . The follow-up period lasted for 12～24 months with a mean of (15.62±4.71) months. There were no statistically significant differences in the time to return ambulation and the time to full weight-bearing activity between the two groups (P＞0.05) . At the latest follow up, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding knee range of motion and Johner-Wruhs grades for clinical consequences (P＞0.05) . In terms of anterior knee pain, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P＞0.05) . In respect of radiographic assessment, the plate group had significantly less residual malalignment than the screw group, including anteroposterior and lateral displacements, as well as angulations in coronal and sagittal planes (P＜0.05) . To the latest follow up, all patients in both group got bony healing of the fractures without a statistical difference in fracture healing time between them (P＞0.05) , and no loosening or breaking of the implants were showed on images in anyone of them. Conclusion: Both the nail plus plate and nail plus blocking screw do achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes for proximal tibial fractures unaffecting the knee. By comparison, the nail combined with plate facilitates to regain and maintain better alignment of the leg regardless of higher implant cost.

scholarly journals Intramedullary Nailing Combined With Adjunct Plate or Blocking Screw for Proximal Tibial Fractures

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Li ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Yao Lu ◽  
Zhong Li ◽  
Kun Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nail ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Plate Versus ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Plate Group ◽  
Proximal Tibial Fractures ◽  
Screw Group

Abstract Objective: To compare the traditional approach of intramedullary nail with an extra plate versus the nail combined with blocking screws for proximal tibia fractures without the knee involved.Methods: From January 2013 to January 2017, a total of 36 patients who suffered from proximal tibial fractures unaffecting the knee were enrolled into this prospective study, and divided into two groups by random number table method. Of them, 19 patients received an interlocking intramedullary nail combined with an extra plate for internal fixation of the fractures (the plate group), while the remaining 17 patients had fractures fixed with the nail combined with blocking screws (the screw group). The perioperative, follow-up and radiographic data were compared between the two groups.Results: All the 36 patients underwent operation smoothly without iatrogenic neurovascular injuries. The plate group proved superior the screw group regarding to operation time and intraoperative X-ray exposure (P＜0.05) , nevertheless the former was inferior to the latter in implant cost and hospital stay (P＜0.05) . The follow-up period lasted for 12～24 months with a mean of (15.62±4.71) months. There were no statistically significant differences in the time to return ambulation and the time to full weight-bearing activity between the two groups (P＞0.05) . At the latest follow up, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding knee range of motion and Johner-Wruhs grades for clinical consequences (P＞0.05) . In terms of anterior knee pain, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P＞0.05) . In respect of radiographic assessment, the plate group had significantly less residual malalignment than the screw group, including anteroposterior and lateral displacements, as well as angulations in coronal and sagittal planes (P＜0.05) . To the latest follow up, all patients in both group got bony healing of the fractures without a statistical difference in fracture healing time between them (P＞0.05) , and no loosening or breaking of the implants were showed on images in anyone of them.Conclusion: Both the nail plus plate and nail plus blocking screw do achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes for proximal tibial fractures unaffecting the knee. By comparison, the nail combined with plate facilitates to regain and maintain better alignment of the leg regardless of higher implant cost.

scholarly journals Comparison of intramedullary nailing fixation and percutaneous locked plating fixation for the treatment of proximal tibial fractures: A meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949902110243
Author(s):  
Cheng Ren ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
Liang Sun ◽  
Zhong Li ◽  
Yibo Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Locked Plating ◽  
Fixation Group ◽  
Proximal Tibial Fractures

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to systematically compare the clinical outcomes of intramedullary nailing (IMN) fixation and percutaneous locked plating (PLP) fixation in the treatment of proximal tibial fractures. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and Wan Fang to select relevant articles up to March 29, 2020 without language limit. Continuous variables were estimated by weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and dichotomous outcomes were calculated by relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. Moreover, heterogeneity analysis was evaluated. Furthermore, publication bias assessment and sensitivity analysis were conducted. Stata 11.0 software was used to perform the statistical analysis. Results: Ten studies involving 667 cases (321 from IMN fixation group and 346 from PLP fixation group) were included. The type of fractures involved in the included articles was extra-articular proximal tibia fractures. IMN fixation method achieved significantly shorter union time ( WMD = −2.88, 95% CI: −3.23 to −2.53, p < 0.001) and full weight-bearing time ( WMD = −2.81, 95% CI: −3.64 to −1.97, p < 0.001) than PLP fixation method. Meanwhile, IMN fixation resulted in lower risks of infection ( RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.91, p = 0.02) and total complications ( RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.60, p < 0.001) than PLP fixation. No significant differences were found in the incidence of nonunion ( p = 0.33), malunion ( p = 0.38), and osteofascial compartment syndrome (OCS, p = 0.62) between the two groups. Conclusions: Compared to PLP fixation, IMN fixation had several advantages in treating proximal tibial fractures, including the short time of union and full weight-bearing, as well as a low risk of infection and total complications.

scholarly journals Nail or plate in the management of distal extra-articular tibial fracture, what is better? Valutation of outcomes

SICOT-J ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Bisaccia ◽  
Andrea Cappiello ◽  
Luigi Meccariello ◽  
Giuseppe Rinonapoli ◽  
Gabriele Falzarano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Fractures ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Excellent Result ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Long Bone ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Distal Tibial Fractures ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Distal tibial fractures are the most common long bone fractures. Several studies focusing on the methods of treatment of displaced distal tibial fractures have been published. To date, locked plates, intramedullary nails and external fixation are the three most used techniques. The aim of our study was to compare intramedullary nail (IMN) and locked plate (LP) for treatment of this kind of fracture. Materials and methods: We collected data on 81 patients with distal tibial fractures (distance from the joint between 40 and 100 mm) and we divided into two groups: IMN and LP. We compared in the 2 groups the mean operation time, the mean union time, the infection rate the rate of malunion and nonunion, the full weight bearing time. Results: No patient in the two groups developed a nonunion. None of the patients obtained a fair or poor outcome. Overall 52 patients obtained an excellent result (69.3%) and 23 obtained a good result (30.6%). Discussion: Our study results indicate a superiority of IMN over LP in terms of lower rates of infections and statistically significant shorter time to full weight bearing. Whereas LP appeared to be advantageous over IMN in terms of leading to a better anatomical and fixed reductions of the fracture and a lower rate of union complications. The two treatments achieved comparable results in terms of operation time, hospital stay, union time and functional outcomes.

scholarly journals Is early full weight bearing safe following locking plate ORIF of distal fibula fractures?

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Zyskowski ◽  
Markus Wurm ◽  
Frederik Greve ◽  
Sebastian Pesch ◽  
Francesca von Matthey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Outcome Parameter ◽  
Distal Fibula ◽  
Plate Group ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Abstract Background In the modern western world appraisal of economical points such as treatment and disability after trauma present a financial burden. In this context open reduction internal fixation techniques allowing for early full weight bearing might not only improve the clinical outcome but also shorten the period of disability in working life. The aim of the study was to analyze whether ORIF of ankle fractures using either a standard semitubular plate or a new polyaxial locking plate system result in a better clinical outcome. Methods In this prospective study, all patients with distal fibula fractures (AO 44 B1.1, B1.2, B1.3), with indication for surgery were included. Patients were randomized to either the DePuy Synthes® one-third semitubular plate (Group I) or NEWCLIP TECHNICS, Active Ankle® polyaxial locking plate (Group II). Primary outcome parameter was function of the ankle joint, assessed by the Olerud and Molander ankle score, Foot and Ankle outcome score and Karlsson and Peterson Scoring System for Ankle function. Secondary outcome parameter were postoperative complications. Superficial wound infection, delayed wound healing, mechanically prominent implant, skin irritations were considered as minor and deep wound infection, material loosening, loss of reduction were regarded as major complications requiring revision surgery. Clinical and radiological follow-up were performed 6 and 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Results Fifty-two patients (31 W/21 M) with a mean age of 43 yrs. (range 22–64 yrs.) were enrolled. Seven patients (13.5%) were excluded, so that 45 patients were available for follow up. Twenty-five patients were treated with DePuy Synthes® one-third semitubular plate (55.6%; group I) while 20 patients received an anatomically preformed polyaxial locking plate (44.4%, group II). Four minor complications occurred in Group I (16%) compared to two minor complications in group II (10%). Significant better clinical results regarding OMAS (p < 0.02, < 0.04), KPSS (p < 0.04) and FAOS (p < 0.02, < 0.03) were observed 6 and 12 weeks after surgery in group II. Conclusions The results of the presented study demonstrate a significant better clinical functional outcome in the early postoperative follow-up in patients treated with a polyaxial locking plate. Furthermore, our data show that ORIF using polyaxial locking plates in combination with an early postoperative weight bearing presents a safe, stable treatment option for ankle fractures so that patients benefit especially in the early stages of recovery. Trial registration Registered 20 April 2020, retrospectively on ClinicalTrails.gov (NCT04370561).

scholarly journals Differences in femoral component subsidence rate after THA using an uncemented collarless femoral stem: full weight-bearing with an enhanced recovery rehabilitation versus partial weight-bearing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Leiss ◽  
Julia Sabrina Götz ◽  
Matthias Meyer ◽  
Günther Maderbacher ◽  
Jan Reinhard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Partial Weight Bearing ◽  
Fill Ratio ◽  
Stem Subsidence ◽  
Partial Weight

Abstract Background Femoral component subsidence is a known risk factor for early failure of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using cementless stems. The aim of the study was to compare an enhanced recovery concept with early full weight-bearing rehabilitation and partial weight-bearing on stem subsidence. In addition, the influence of patient-related and anatomical risk factors on subsidence shall be assessed. Methods One hundred and fourteen patients underwent primary cementless THA and were retrospectively analyzed. Sixty-three patients had an enhanced recovery rehabilitation with early full weight-bearing and 51 patients had rehabilitation with partial weight-bearing (20 kg) for 6 weeks. Postoperative subsidence was analyzed on standing pelvic anterior–posterior radiographs after 4 weeks and 1 year. Subsidence was measured in mm. Anatomical and prosthetic risk factors (stem size, canal flare index, canal fill ratio as well as BMI and demographic data) were correlated. Results Femoral stem subsidence rate was significantly higher for the group with an enhanced recovery concept compared to the group with partial weight-bearing at the first radiological follow up after 4 weeks [2.54 mm (SD ± 1.86) vs. 1.55 mm (SD ± 1.80)] and the second radiological follow up after 1 year [3.43 mm (SD ± 2.24) vs. 1.94 (SD ± 2.16)] (p < 0.001, respectively). Stem angulation > 3° had a significant influence on subsidence. Canal flare index and canal fill ratio showed no significant correlation with subsidence as well as BMI and age. Conclusion In the present study, cementless stem subsidence was significantly higher in the group with enhanced recovery rehabilitation compared to partial weight-bearing. Small absolute values and differences were demonstrated and therefore possibly below clinical relevance. Anatomical radiological parameters and anthropometric data did not appear to be risk factors for stem subsidence.

scholarly journals Is It Necessary to Reduce Thoracolumbar Compression Fractures  with Intermediate Screws in the Fractured Vertebra?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZeJun Xing ◽  
Shuai Hao ◽  
XiaoFei Wu
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Body Height ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Short Segment ◽  
Compression Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Screw Group

Abstract PurposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous short-segment pedicle screws fixation (PPSF) with or without intermediate screws (IS) for the treatment of thoracolumbar compression fractures.MethodsFrom January 2016 to March 2019, a retrospective study of 38 patients with thoracolumbar compression fractures conducted. The patients were divided into a 4-screw group (without IS) and a 6-screw group (with IS) according to whether pedicle screws were placed in the fractured vertebrae. Combined positional reduction effects with the technique of pre-contoured lordotic rods were used to reduce the fracture by lengthening the anterior column of the fractured vertebrae. The posterior structure of the fractured vertebrae was undertaken as the fulcrum point for both groups. The operation time, intra-operative blood loss, visual analogue scale (VAS), anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), segment kyphosis（SK）before and after operation and complications were recorded.ResultsAlthough the operation time and blood loss in the 6-screw group were higher than in the 4-screw group, difference was not significant (P＞0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS, AVBH and SK between the two groups (P＞0.05). Nevertheless, these results were significant differences between the preoperative and the immediate postoperative, between preoperative and follow-up groups (P < 0.001). No neurologic injury was observed in either groups. ConclusionsIn the treatment of thoracolumbar compression fractures, percutaneous short-segment pedicle screws fixation without intermediate screws in the 4-screw construct may obtain the same clinical effect as that in the 6-screw construct.

scholarly journals SIMULTANEOUS INSUFFICIENCY FRACTURE OF BILATERAL NECK OF FEMUR WITH COXA VARA

2020 ◽  
pp. 41-42
Author(s):  
Rishabh Surana ◽  
Saurabh Singh ◽  
Alok Rai
Keyword(s):  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Insufficiency Fracture ◽  
Young Female ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Coxa Vara ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Femur Neck ◽  
Femur Neck Fracture ◽  
Neck Fracture

Simultaneous insufficiency fracture of bilateral neck of femur with displacement and coxa vara is very uncommon , and very challenging. Osteomalacia is a known cause of insufficiency fracture. We present a case of a young female with non traumatic simultaneous bilateral femur neck fracture. On radiological and laboratory investigation fracture was diagnosed as insufficiency fracture due to osteomalacia with coxa vara. Treatment was done by intertrochanteric valgus osteotomy and fixation by dynamic condylar screw with a prebend plate along with oral and parentral vitamin D therapy. On six month follow up both side fractures were well united and patient was able to walk without pain with full weight bearing and with normal gait .Her lab investigations also returned to normal during follow up.

scholarly journals Intercalary reconstruction of femur after tumour resection: is a vascularized fibular autograft plus allograft a long-lasting solution?

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (3) ◽  
pp. 378-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Campanacci ◽  
F. Totti ◽  
S. Puccini ◽  
G. Beltrami ◽  
G. Scoccianti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Bone Tumour ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Tumour Resection ◽  
Fibular Graft ◽  
Musculoskeletal Tumor Society ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
The Mean

Aims After intercalary resection of a bone tumour from the femur, reconstruction with a vascularized fibular graft (VFG) and massive allograft is considered a reliable method of treatment. However, little is known about the long-term outcome of this procedure. The aims of this study were to determine whether the morbidity of this procedure was comparable to that of other reconstructive techniques, if it was possible to achieve a satisfactory functional result, and whether biological reconstruction with a VFG and massive allograft could achieve a durable, long-lasting reconstruction. Patients and Methods A total of 23 patients with a mean age of 16 years (five to 40) who had undergone resection of an intercalary bone tumour of the femur and reconstruction with a VFG and allograft were reviewed clinically and radiologically. The mean follow-up was 141 months (24 to 313). The mean length of the fibular graft was 18 cm (12 to 29). Full weight-bearing without a brace was allowed after a mean of 13 months (seven to 26). Results At final follow-up, the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score of 22 evaluable patients was 94% (73 to 100). Eight major complications, five fractures (21.7%), and three nonunions (13%) were seen in seven patients (30.4%). Revision-free survival was 72.3% at five, ten, and 15 years, with fracture and nonunion needing surgery as failure endpoints. Overall survival, with removal of allograft or amputation as failure endpoints, was 94.4% at five, ten, and 15 years. Discussion There were no complications needing surgical revision after five years had elapsed from surgery, suggesting that the mechanical strength of the implant improves with time, thereby decreasing the risk of complications. In young patients with an intercalary bone tumour of the femur, combining a VFG and massive allograft may result in a reconstruction that lasts a lifetime. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:378–86.

scholarly journals Is cemented revision total hip arthroplasty a reasonable treatment option in an elderly population?

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Born ◽  
Isabella Manzoni ◽  
Thomas Ilchmann ◽  
Martin Clauss
Keyword(s):  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Elderly Population ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Septic Loosening ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Press Fit ◽  
Revision Tha

Revision THA is increasingly performed especially in the elderly population. The surgeon’s challenge is to provide a solution that supports immediate full weight-bearing, despite poor bone quality. Shape-closed revision stems facilitate that by combining cement fixation with additional press-fit anchoring. The design tolerates varying cement mantle thickness and inconsistent cancellous bone lining of the femoral canal. Following that philosophy, we present our mid-term results using a long version of a cemented Charnley- Kerboull type stem. From 2010 to 2017, 38 long Charnley-Kerboull revision stems (Centris®, Mathys European Orthopaedics, Bettlach, Switzerland) were implanted and followed prospectively. Surgery was performed via a Hardinge approach in supine position with a third generation cementing technique. Patients were mobilized using full-weight bearing as early as possible. Survival was determined for stem revision for aseptic loosening and stem and/or cup revision for any reason. 20 stems had a minimum follow-up (f/u) of 2 years and were included for further radiological analysis. Detailed subsidence analysis as an early predictor for later aseptic loosening was performed using EBRA-FCA software. Further, the presence of osteolysis and cement debonding was evaluated. Mean follow- up was 4 years. No patient was lost to f/u.18 died of causes unrelated to THA. Stem survival was 100%. Survival for any re-operation was 82.2% (two early infections, one soft-tissue debridement, one cup exchange for recurrent dislocations). None of the cases revised for septic loosening showed signs of persistent infection at final f/u. EBRA-FCA revealed two oligosymptomatic cases of subsidence of 5mm and 6mm over a course of 2 and 12 months, respectively, with stable implants thereafter. Neither required revision. There was no development of osteolysis or debonding. The stem provides a reliable early fullweight bearing solution for revision THA with excellent mid-term survival in an elderly population. Even in two cases where subsidence was present, mobility was not impaired and re-revision could be avoided.

Reconstruction with Custom Unicondylar Hemiarthroplasty following Tumor Resection: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (08) ◽  
pp. 818-824
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Ippolito ◽  
Megan L. Campbell ◽  
Brianna L. Siracuse ◽  
Joseph Benevenia
Keyword(s):  
Distal Femur ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Musculoskeletal Tumor ◽  
Musculoskeletal Tumor Society ◽  
Optimal Function ◽  
Tumor Involvement

AbstractFor patients with tumors of the distal femur, options for limb salvage include tumor resection followed by reconstruction. While reconstruction commonly involves a distal femoral replacement, careful selection of patients with tumor involvement limited to a single condyle may be candidates for reconstruction with distal femur hemiarthroplasty. In these procedures, resection spares considerably more native anatomy. Three consecutive patients who underwent resection and reconstruction at the distal femur with custom unicondylar hemiarthroplasty are presented in this case series at a mean follow-up of 45 months (range, 26–78). In two cases, prostheses were utilized as a secondary procedure after failure of initial reconstruction. In one case, the custom prosthesis was utilized as the primary method of reconstruction. Mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society disease-specific scores were 26.7 (range, 25–28). All patients achieved a return to full weight bearing, activities of daily living, and functional range of motion. In appropriately selected patients with tumors of the distal femur, reconstruction with custom unicondylar hemiarthroplasty provides benefits including optimal function postoperatively via preservation of tumor-free bone and ligamentous structures. Additionally, maintenance of greater bone stock may confer benefits to patients with pathology at a high likelihood for recurrence and need for subsequent procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document