Medical Device Usability Analyses

Author(s):  
Kristi R. Campoe

Errors committed during healthcare providers’ use of patient controlled analgesia (PCA) systems in the acute care setting are poorly understood. A PCA is a complex, medical device that delivers a prescribed pain medication primarily through the intravenous route into the patient. The benefits of PCA use are numerous, but PCAs are also a known source of errors resulting in patient injury. Human factors usability analyses are methods to identify and mitigate factors that contribute to errors during user-device interaction. The purpose of this paper is to present the findings from an integrative review of published medical device usability analyses and to provide the foundation for future empirical research to improve our understanding of PCA system errors.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Bryand

Nurse to nurse handoff that occurs at the end of each shift is a known area of potential safety risk due to poor communication and inadequate safety checks. The Joint Commission (TJC) reported that communication between healthcare providers or between patient and healthcare providers was the leading root cause of sentinel events. Research supports the benefits of a structure handoff at the bedside to patient safety and satisfaction. Despite these proven benefits, staff nurses have not consistently embraced the practice. The purpose of this study was to identify nurses’ perceived barriers to performing SBARP (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation and Patient) at the bedside in an acute care setting. Rogers Diffusion of Innovation Theory was used to guide the development and implementation of this project. A mixed qualitative and quantitative survey was utilized to assess the nurses’ perceived barriers to performing SBARP at the patient’s bedside. The survey was distributed to nurses employed on two medical-surgical floors at Newport Hospital. Responses (N = 19) showed that although staff nurses perceived that bedside handoff positively impacted patient satisfaction and patient safety, they did not routinely practice bedside handoff. Nurses cited lack of comfort with the practice, patient privacy, perception of time, and communication of sensitive information as barriers to performing bedside handoff. Sustaining practice change over time in an organization can be challenging. Leadership support and enforcement of bedside handoff in addition to targeted education to reduce perceived barriers to the practice may help to increase the practice of bedside handoff.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather L Neville ◽  
Courtney Granter ◽  
Pegah Adibi ◽  
Julia Belliveau ◽  
Jennifer E Isenor ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Benzodiazepines and sedative-hypnotics (BZD/SHD) are commonly utilized in the acute care setting for insomnia and anxiety and are associated with cognitive impairment, falls, fractures, and increased mortality. Interventions to reduce use of BZD/SHD in hospitals are not well characterized. The objective of the scoping review was to identify and characterize interventions to reduce the use of BZD/SHD by adults for anxiety and sedation in hospitals.Methods We included studies and abstracts published in English that described an intervention to reduce BZD/SHD in adult hospital patients. Six databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science) and the grey literature (Opengrey, Grey Matters, Google Advanced) were searched up to July 2018. Titles and abstracts were screened and full-text articles were reviewed for potential inclusion by three independent reviewers. Data on each eligible study was charted in a Microsoft Excel® database. Stakeholder consultation occurred before and after the scoping review was completed. Results There were 9480 records identified from all sources and 35 studies were included in the scoping review. Included studies were divided into two categories that emerged from stakeholder feedback: sedatives prescribed in hospital or home medications. The most common study designs were pre-/post-test (24, 68.6%) and randomized controlled trials (6, 17.1%). The majority of studies tested a single intervention (28, 80%) and these were most commonly education, relaxation training and sleep protocols. Patients were frequently the target of relaxation training and behavior change interventions, while sleep protocols, multifaceted interventions and education were usually directed at healthcare providers, either alone or in combination with patients. Most studies reported positive outcomes in decreasing BZD/SHD use (23, 65.7%), including some that were statistically significant (13, 37.1%). Conclusions This scoping review found a variety of interventions aimed at decreasing the utilization of BZD/SHD in the acute care setting, where previously little was known. Current literature addressed the initiation of BZD/SHD in hospital, rather than chronic medications that had been prescribed in the community. Stakeholder consultation supported these findings and pointed out important factors to consider when designing an intervention for hospital patients. Registration: Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/u7s4h/?view_only=15a9b9134be743b6a4177ba2eec9e91a


Displays ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 221-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Sharples ◽  
Jennifer Martin ◽  
Alexandra Lang ◽  
Michael Craven ◽  
Sonja O’Neill ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Wendy Caddye

This new chapter highlights the importance of recognizing, assessing, and managing patients in pain safely in the acute care setting, and particularly when they are acutely ill. It explains pain theories, the importance of assessment and management of pain and explores the use of pharmacological, non-pharmacological and invasive analgesic techniques during acute care: which include the use of patient controlled analgesia (PCA); and regional analgesia including spinals, epidurals and continuous perineural blockade (CPNB). The use of intravenous lidocaine and plasters are also discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarina Lahtinen ◽  
Elina Reponen ◽  
Anne Vakkuri ◽  
Riku Palanne ◽  
Mikko Rantasalo ◽  
...  

AbstractShort CommunicationsSevere post-operative pain is common after total knee arthroplasty. Patient-controlled analgesia is an alternative method of pain management, whereby a patient administers his or her own pain medication. Patients seem to prefer this method over nurse-administered analgesia. However, it remains unclear whether patients using patient-controlled analgesia devices use higher or lower doses of opioids compared to patients treated with oral opioids.Objectives and MethodsThis retrospective study examined 164 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Post-operatively, 82 patients received oxycodone via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia devices, while the pain medication for 82 patients in the control group was administered by nurses. The main outcome measure was the consumption of intravenous opioid equivalents within 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were the use of anti-emetic drugs and the length of stay. Furthermore, we evaluated opioid-related adverse event reports.ResultsThe consumption of opioids during the first 24 h after surgery and the use of anti-emetic drugs were similar in both groups. The median opioid dose of intravenous morphine equivalents was 41.1 mg (interquartile range (IQR): 29.5–69.1 mg) in the patient-controlled analgesia group and 40.5 mg (IQR: 32.4–48.6 mg) in the control group, respectively. The median length of stay was 2 days (IQR: 2–3 days) in the patient-controlled analgesia group and 3 days (IQR: 2–3 days) in the control group (p=0.02). The use of anti-emetic drugs was similar in both groups.ConclusionsThe administration of oxycodone via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia devices does not lead to increased opioid or anti-emetic consumptions compared to nurse-administered pain medication after total knee arthroplasty. Patient-controlled analgesia might lead to shortened length of stay.


2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Testuz ◽  
H. Muller ◽  
P.-F. Keller ◽  
P. Meyer ◽  
T. Stampfli ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 906-919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline M. Masley ◽  
Carey-Leah Havrilko ◽  
Mark R. Mahnensmith ◽  
Molly Aubert ◽  
Diane U. Jette

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document