scholarly journals Postoperative Narcotic Prescription Practice in Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 247301141877594
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Hearty ◽  
Paul Butler ◽  
John Anderson ◽  
Donald Bohay
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Pain Medication ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Ankle Surgery

Background: The misuse and abuse of opioid pain medications have become a public health crisis. Because orthopedic surgeons are the third highest prescribers of opioids, understanding their postoperative pain medication prescribing practices is key to solving the opioid crisis. To this end, we conducted a study of the variability in orthopedic foot and ankle surgery postoperative opioid prescribing practice patterns. Methods: Three hundred fifty orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons were contacted; respondents completed a survey with 4 common patient scenarios and surgical procedures followed by questions regarding typical postoperative pain medication prescriptions. The scenarios ranged from minimally painful procedures to those that would be expected to be significantly more painful. Summaries were calculated as percentages and chi-square or Fisher exact tests were used to compare survey responses between groups stratified by years in practice and type of practice. Results: Sixty-four surgeons responded to the survey (92.8% male), 31% were in practice less than 5 years, 34% 6 to 15 years and 34% more than 15 years. For each scenario, there was variation in the type of pain medication prescribed ( scenario 1: 17% 5 mg hydrocodone, 22% 10 mg hydrocodone, 52% oxycodone, and 3% oxycodone sustained release [SR]; scenario 2: 15% 5 mg hydrocodone, 13% 10 mg hydrocodone, 58% oxycodone, and 9% oxycodone SR; scenario 3: 11% 5 mg hydrocodone, 13% 10 mg hydrocodone, 56% oxycodone, and 14.1% oxycodone SR; scenario 4: 3% 5 mg hydrocodone, 5% 10 mg hydrocodone, 44% oxycodone, and 45% oxycodone SR) and the number of pills dispensed. Use of multimodal pain management was variable but most physicians use regional nerve blocks for each scenario (76%, 87%, 69%, 94%). Less experienced surgeons (less than 5 years in practice) supplement with tramadol more for scenario 1 ( P = .034) as well as use regional nerve blocks for scenario 2 ( P = .039) more than experienced surgeons (more than 15 years in practice). Conclusion: It is evident that variation exists in narcotic prescription practices for postoperative pain management by orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons. With new AAOS guidelines, it is important to try to create some standardization in opioid prescription protocols.

scholarly journals Self-Reported Pain Tolerance and Opioid Pain Medication Use after Foot and Ankle Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0000
Author(s):  
Laura E. Sokil ◽  
Elizabeth McDonald ◽  
Ryan G. Rogero ◽  
Daniel J. Fuchs ◽  
Steven M. Raikin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Pain Medication ◽  
Pain Tolerance ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Ankle Surgery ◽  
Perceived Pain

Category: Pain Management Introduction/Purpose: The opioid epidemic in the United States continues to take lives. As one of the top prescribing groups, orthopaedic surgeons must tailor post-surgical pain control to minimize the potential for harm from prescription opioid use. Patients often reference their own pain threshold as a benchmark for how they will tolerate the pain of surgery, but current literature suggests that there is not a significant correlation between an individual’s perceived pain threshold and their actual threshold for heat stimulus. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a correlation between a patient’s self- reported pain tolerance and their actual prescription narcotic medication usage after foot and ankle surgery. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients that underwent outpatient foot and ankle surgeries performed by 5 fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons at a large, multispecialty orthopaedic practice over a one year period. Demographic data, procedural details and anesthesia type were collected. Narcotic usage data including number of pills dispensed and pill counts performed at the first postoperative visit were obtained. Patients were contacted via email or telephone between 7-19 months postoperatively, and asked to respond to the validated statement “Pain doesn’t bother me as much as it does most people” by choosing “strongly disagree”, “disagree”, “neither”, “agree” or “strongly agree”. Patients scored their pain threshold on a scale of 1- 100 with 0 being “pain intolerant” and 100 a ”high pain threshold" and ranked their expectations of the pain after surgery and satisfaction with pain management on respective five-point Likert scales. Data was analyzed using a Spearman’s correlation. Results: Of the 486 patients who completed surveys, average age was 51.24 years, 32.1% were male and 7.82% current smokers. After controlling for age and anesthesia type, both agreement with the validated statement and higher pain tolerance score had a weak negative correlation with pills taken (r=-0.13, p=0.004 and r=-0.14, p=0.002, respectively); patients with higher perceived pain thresholds took fewer opioid pills after surgery (Table 1). Correlation between high expectations of postoperative pain and pills taken was weakly negative (r=-0.28, p=<0.001) (Table 1). Patients who found surgery more painful than they expected took less pain medication. There was a small, positive correlation between pain tolerance and satisfaction with pain management (r=0.12, p=0.008), indicating that patients with a relatively high pain tolerance had more satisfaction (Table 1). Conclusion: Assessment of both subjective description and quantitative score of a patient’s pain threshold prior to surgery may assist the surgeon in tailoring postoperative pain control regimens. Unexpectedly, patients who found surgery less painful than expected actually took a greater number of opioid pills. This may highlight an educational opportunity regarding postoperative pain management in order to reduce narcotic requirement. Setting expectations on safe utilization of prescribed pain medications may also increase satisfaction. This study provides useful information for surgeons to customize pain management regimens and to perform effective preoperative education and counseling regarding postoperative pain management. [Table: see text]

Opioid Reduction Through Postoperative Pain Management in Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerwyn Jones ◽  
Laurie Engler ◽  
Elizabeth Fonte ◽  
Ibrahim Farid ◽  
Michael T. Bigham
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Control Charts ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Orthopedic Surgical Procedures ◽  
Pediatric Orthopedic ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Order Set

OBJECTIVES Our goal with this initiative was to reduce discharge opioid prescriptions while maintaining optimal pain management through the use of standardized pain prescribing guidelines for pediatric patients after orthopedic surgical procedures. METHODS Through analysis of established yet inconsistent prescribing practices, we created a 4-tiered guideline for pediatric orthopedic postoperative pain management prescription ordering. Following the Model for Improvement methodology including iterative plan-do-study-act cycles, the team created an electronic medical record order set to be used at discharge from the hospital. The provider compliance with this order set was monitored and analyzed over time by using provider-level and aggregate control charts. A secondary measure of opioid prescriptions (morphine milligram Eq [MME] dosage per patient) was tracked over time. The balancing measure was the analysis of unanticipated opioid prescription refills. RESULTS Greater than 90% compliance with the guidelines was achieved and sustained for 20 months. This resulted in a 54% reduction in opioids prescribed during the improvement period (baseline = 71 MME per patient; postintervention = 33 MME per patient) and has been sustained for 12 months. The percentage of unanticipated opioid prescription refills did not significantly change from the period before the institution of the guidelines and after institution of the guidelines (2017 = 3%; 2019 = 3%). CONCLUSIONS The creation of these guidelines has led to a significant reduction in the number of opioids prescribed while maintaining effective postoperative pain management.

scholarly journals How Will the Foot and Ankle Orthopedic Community Respond to the Growing Opioid Epidemic?

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 247301141876446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle S. Donahue ◽  
Noortje Catherine Hagemeijer ◽  
Anne Holly Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Orthopedic Surgery ◽  
Clinical Guidelines ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Consumption Patterns ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Opioid Epidemic ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Ankle Surgery

In the midst of the current opioid crisis, it has become critically important to properly manage opioid-prescribing patterns for the treatment of postoperative pain. There is currently a scarcity of literature specifying prescription and consumption patterns following orthopedic surgery and specifically foot and ankle surgery. Clinical guidelines for postoperative pain management are deficient.

Postoperative Pain Management

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Parmar
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Patient Controlled Analgesia ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Epidural Catheter Placement ◽  
Opiate Abuse ◽  
Regional Nerve Block

The aim of this review is to provide practical clinical information on modern pain management options to guide the clinician on evidence-based practices, optimizing the treatment of pain and avoiding practices that may lead to potential abuse. Postoperative pain management is an essential component of any surgeon’s practice and has clear implications for surgical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and population health. Understanding options within a multimodal approach to pain management in the acute setting is a key determinant to improving outcomes for our patients. This review discusses multimodal analgesic options, including a variety of pain medications (opiates, antiinflammatory medications, and patient-controlled analgesia) and techniques (epidural catheter placement, regional nerve blocks) to be used in tandem. Lastly, best possible practices to avoid opiate abuse are discussed. This review contains 4 figures, 5 tables, 1 video and 96 references. Key words: antiinflammatories, epidural, narcotics, patient-controlled analgesia, postoperative pain, regional nerve block

scholarly journals Our first Experience of Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Post Operative Analgesia in a Case of Fracture Femur in TU Teaching Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-250
Author(s):  
Bigen Man Shakya ◽  
Ninadini Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Pain Medication ◽  
Fracture Femur ◽  
Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block

The postoperative pain management in the elderly is challenging due to comorbidities and change in physiology due to age itself. This limit the use of medication which include pain medication also. The fascia iliaca compartment block has been described in the literature for fracture of femur. It has even been safely used by non anaesthesiologist also. To our knowledge, we did not find any case report of continuous fascia iliaca compartment block published in Nepal. This is our first experience of successful continous fasicia iliaca compartment block in case of 89 year old lady with multiple co morbidities in whom traditional pain medication might be difficult to use. We encourage to practice this block which is both safe and easy to perform with good results.

scholarly journals Proper Postsurgical Pain Management in Orthopaedics: Reviewing the Efficacy of Wound Infiltration with Liposomal Bupivacaine (EXPAREL)

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-9
Author(s):  
Vani Sabesan ◽  
Timothy R Jelsema ◽  
Daniel J Lombardo
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Pain Management ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Multimodal Approach ◽  
Wound Infiltration ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Liposomal Bupivacaine ◽  
Postsurgical Pain ◽  
Limited Efficacy

ABSTRACT Adequate postoperative pain management after an orthopaedic procedure is critical for patient well-being, acceptable clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Current literature suggests over 80% of surgical patients’ state they have moderate to severe pain within 24 hours postoperatively. The standard in pain management for more than 40 years has been opioids, medications known for their many adverse effects and limited efficacy. Recently, a multimodal approach to pain control has been sought after for optimal postoperative pain management. This approach utilizes multiple methods of pain management, such as nerve blocks, wound infiltration with local anesthetics and oral analgesics, to concomitantly reduce postoperative pain. Liposomal bupivacaine, EXPAREL, has been shown to reduce pain for as long as 96 hours postoperatively in select studies. These studies have included both hard and soft-tissue procedures. The goal of this review is to examine the literature on EXPAREL and provide a comprehensive presentation for orthopaedic surgeons to apply to their practices. Sabesan V, Jelsema TR, Lombardo DJ. Proper Postsurgical Pain Management in Orthopaedics: Reviewing the Efficacy of Wound Infiltration with Liposomal Bupivacaine (EXPAREL). The Duke Orthop J 2015;5(1):6-9.

scholarly journals Outcome Following Lower Extremity Nerve Block during Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0022
Author(s):  
Arianna L. Gianakos ◽  
Filippo Romanelli ◽  
Malaka Badri ◽  
Naina Rao ◽  
Bart Lubberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Complication Risk ◽  
Prospective Comparison ◽  
Ankle Surgery

Category: Ankle; Other Introduction/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the current literature assessing the management of pain with various block techniques in the perioperative period during elective foot and ankle surgery. Methods: A review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched on October 1, 2019. Studies were identified by using synonyms for ‘foot’, ‘ankle’, ‘pain management’, ‘opioid’ and ‘nerve block’. Inclusion criteria were studies that 1) reported and compared the outcomes following various types of peripheral nerve blocks in in foot and ankle surgery, 2) were published in the English language, and 3) were published within the last 10 years. Results: Twenty-four articles evaluating 4,640 patients were included. Sixty-seven percent were randomized controlled trials, 17% were prospective comparison studies, and 17% were retrospective comparison studies. Nerve block techniques included: femoral, adductor canal, sciatic, popliteal, saphenous, and ankle. Ropivacaine and bupivacaine were most commonly utilized. Postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative pain levels were reduced with use of PNB when compared with systemic/local anesthesia, in patients receiving combined popliteal/femoral block, and in patients receiving continuous infusion popliteal block [Table 1, Table 2]. Studies demonstrated higher satisfaction with PNB, continuous infusion, and dual injections [Table 3]. One study reported 7% neurologic related complication risk and demonstrated a higher complication rate when with popliteal versus ankle block. All other studies were equivocal or failed to mention complications. Conclusion: Optimal pain management for elective foot and ankle surgery remains controversial and an ideal protocol from a risk-benefit perspective regarding use of PNB has yet to be established. Our study demonstrates improvements in postoperative pain levels, opioid consumption, and length of stay in patients receiving a PNB when compared with systemic anesthesia. Combined PNB and dual catheter administration may improve outcomes. Unfortunately, little data has been published on risks and tradeoffs in order to help guide patients and surgeons with a well informed shared decision making model. Future studies are needed to better clarify any respective tradeoffs to these options. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document