scholarly journals Patient Outcomes Differences Following Ankle Fracture Fixation with or without Ankle Arthroscopy

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0001
Author(s):  
Kenneth S. Smith ◽  
Katherine D. Drexelius ◽  
Shanthan C. Challa ◽  
Daniel K. Moon ◽  
Joshua A. Metzl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Function ◽  
Ankle Fracture ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Ankle Arthroscopy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Function Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Physical Function Score

Category: Arthroscopy; Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Ankle fractures are one of the most common types of fractures, yet there is currently no consensus about how best to treat these patients. The treatment approach typically includes open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF), but not all patients have a good clinical outcome. Intra-articular injuries have been suggested as one potential cause of these sub-optimal outcomes. Use of arthroscopy at the time of surgery is useful in identifying intra-articular lesions in acute ankle fractures, however, there is no evidence that arthroscopic intervention changes the patient’s outcome. Ankle arthroscopy increases the duration and potential complications of anesthesia administration and also increases cost. Our study assesses the clinical impact of arthroscopy accompanying an ankle fracture ORIF, which is essential to promote positive outcomes, while decreasing unnecessary complications and costs. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review. We queried all patients that underwent operative fixation of a bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fracture at our institution from January 1, 2014 through November 1, 2018. From this list, we excluded patients less than 18 years old and patients that had concomitant injuries to other body parts that required surgery. In addition, we only included Weber B and Weber C fibula fracture to homogenize the data. We then performed a chart review to extract all demographic data, fracture pattern, surgical procedures performed, tourniquet times, any revision surgeries, arthroscopic findings and any interventions performed due to the arthroscopic portion of the procedure. We then conducted a phone and email survey utilizing the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Short Form and the two question Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). Results: Our study included 213 total patients (142 traditional ORIF, 71 ORIF plus arthroscopy) with an average age of 40 (standard deviation 14.2). The average follow up was 32.4 (13.1) months with a survey follow up rate of 50.7%. The demographic information between the two cohorts was statistically similar. The average tourniquet time for the arthroscopy cohort is 10 minutes longer (89 minutes versus 79 minutes). During the arthroscopy, there was a 28.2% rate of full thickness osteochondral lesions, 33.8% rate of loose bodies, and a 49.2% rate of small cartilage injury not requiring intervention. The mean PROMIS physical function score amongst Weber B fibula fractures was 45.8 and 42.3 in the arthroscopy and non-arthroscopy groups respectively (P value 0.012). In addition, the patient satisfaction rate in Weber B fibula fractures was higher in those patients that underwent arthroscopy as compared to ORIF alone (93.1% versus 75.5%, P value of 0.05). Patients that suffered a tibiotalar joint dislocation at the time of the ankle fracture had a significantly higher PROMIS physical function score (46.6 versus 40.2, P value 0.005) when their surgery included arthroscopy. Conclusion: Ankle arthroscopy at the time of ORIF led to higher mean patient reported outcomes for every tested metric but this reached statistical significance only when looking at the Weber B fibula fractures and ankle dislocations. There was no increase in complication rate and the arthroscopy took only 10 minutes longer on average. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Outcomes Following Ankle Fracture Fixation With or Without Ankle Arthroscopy

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 247301142090404
Author(s):  
Kenneth S. Smith ◽  
Katherine Drexelius ◽  
Shanthan Challa ◽  
Daniel K. Moon ◽  
Joshua A. Metzl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Function ◽  
Ankle Fracture ◽  
Ankle Arthroscopy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Function Score ◽  
Anatomic Reduction ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Physical Function Score ◽  
Operative Fixation

Background: Ankle fractures are one of the most common orthopedic injuries, and although most patients have a satisfactory outcome following operative fixation, there are patients that have persistent pain despite anatomic reduction. Intra-articular injuries have been suggested as one potential cause of these suboptimal outcomes. Our study assesses the clinical impact of performing an ankle arthroscopy during ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent operative fixation of a bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fracture at our institution from 2014 through 2018. We extracted all demographic data, fracture pattern, operative procedures performed, tourniquet times, arthroscopic findings and any arthroscopic interventions. We then conducted a phone and e-mail survey. Our study included 213 total patients (142 traditional ORIF, 71 ORIF plus arthroscopy) with an average age of 40 years. The average follow-up was 32.4 months with a survey follow-up rate of 50.7% (110/213). Results: The average tourniquet time for the arthroscopy cohort was 10 minutes longer (89 minutes vs 79 minutes). During the arthroscopy, there was a 28% (20/71) rate of full-thickness osteochondral lesions, 33% (24/71) rate of loose bodies, and a 49% (35/71) rate of partial-thickness cartilage injury. The mean Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) physical function score among Weber B fibula fractures was 45.8 and 42.3 in the arthroscopy and nonarthroscopy groups, respectively ( P = .012). In addition, the patient satisfaction rate in Weber B fibula fractures was higher in those patients who underwent arthroscopy compared with ORIF alone (93% vs 75%, P = .05). Patients who had a tibiotalar joint dislocation at the time of the ankle fracture had a significantly higher PROMIS physical function score (46.6 vs 40.2, P = .005) when their surgery included arthroscopy. Conclusion: Ankle arthroscopy at the time of ORIF led to statistically significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes for Weber B fibula fractures and ankle dislocations. There was no increase in complication rates and the arthroscopy took 10 minutes longer on average. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

scholarly journals Depression and Pain Interference Correlate With Physical Function in Patients Recovering From Hand Surgery

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 830-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom J. Crijns ◽  
David N. Bernstein ◽  
David Ring ◽  
Ronald M. Gonzalez ◽  
Danielle M. Wilbur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coping Strategies ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Hand Surgery ◽  
Pain Interference ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Function Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Physical Function Score

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures vary more than expected based on underlying pathology, in part due to the substantial influence of mood and coping strategies. Methods: This study addressed the primary null hypothesis that the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function score 1 month (range, 3-8 weeks) after hand surgery is not associated with PROMIS Depression and PROMIS Pain Interference scores prior to surgery, accounting for other factors. Using an institution-wide database of routinely collected patient-reported outcomes, we identified adult patients who underwent wrist ganglion excision, trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty, hand ganglion excision, trigger digit, De Quervain, and carpal tunnel release. Measures collected included the PROMIS Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT), PROMIS Pain Interference CAT, and PROMIS Depression CAT. We sought factors associated with postsurgical PROMIS Physical Function scores and change between preoperative and postoperative score using multivariable linear regression, accounting for age, sex, surgery type, provider, and time from surgery to postsurgical measurement. Results: Higher postoperative PROMIS Physical Function score was independently associated with lower PROMIS Pain Interference scores, lower PROMIS Depression scores, younger age, and treatment by provider team 3. Greater change in PROMIS Physical Function score was independently associated with greater PROMIS Pain Interference scores, greater time from surgery, and treatment by provider team 3. Conclusions: Mood and effective coping strategies affect the level of symptoms and limitations during recovery from hand surgery and represent important treatment opportunities for enhancing recovery.

scholarly journals Capturing a Patient-Reported Measure of Physical Function Through an Online Electronic Health Record Patient Portal in an Ambulatory Clinic: Implementation Study (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Jinoos Yazdany ◽  
Laura Trupin ◽  
Zara Izadi ◽  
Milena Gianfrancesco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Patient Portal ◽  
Rheumatology Clinic ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Physical Function Score ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
White Patients

BACKGROUND Despite significant interest in the collection of patient-reported outcomes to make care more patient-centered, few studies have evaluated implementation efforts to collect patient-reported outcomes from diverse patient populations OBJECTIVE We assessed the collection of patient-reported outcomes from rheumatoid arthritis patients in an academic rheumatology clinic, using a paper and an online form through the electronic health record patient portal. METHODS We identified patients seen between 2012-2016 with ≥2 face-to-face encounters with a rheumatology provider and International Classification of Diseases codes for RA, ≥30 days apart. In 2013, our clinic implemented a paper version of the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function form that was administered to patients upon their check-in at the clinic. In 2015, an online version of the form became available by way of the electronic health record patient portal to patients with active portal accounts. We compared the proportion of visits with documented PROMIS scores across age, race and ethnicity, and language and examined trends over time using a control chart. RESULTS We included 1078 patients with rheumatoid arthritis with 7049 in-person encounters at the rheumatology clinic over 4 years, with an average of 168 visits per month. Of the included patients, 80.4% of patients (867/1078) were female and the mean age was 58 (SD 16) years. The overall PROMIS physical function score documentation increased from 60.4% (1081/1791) of visits in 2013 to 74.4% (905/1217) of visits in 2016. Online score documentation increased from 10.0% (148/1473) in 2015 to 19.3% (235/1217) in 2016. African American patients were least likely to have a PROMIS physical function score recorded (55/88, 62.5% compared to 792/990, 80.0% for other racial or ethnic groups; P<.001). Compared with white patients, both African American and Hispanic patients were less likely to have active online electronic health record portal accounts (44/88, 50% and 90/157, 57.3% respectively, compared to 437/521, 83.9% of white patients; P<.001) and, once activated, less likely to use the online survey (6/44, 13.6% and 16/90, 17.8% respectively, compared to 135/437, 30.9% of white patients; P=.02). There was no significant difference in the proportion of any PROMIS physical function forms recorded between non-English vs English preferred patients. No significant differences were found across age or gender. CONCLUSIONS PROMIS physical function form completion improved overall from 2012-2016 but lagged among racial and ethnic minorities and non-English preferred patients. Future studies should address issues of portal access, enrollment, satisfaction, and persistence and focus on developing PRO implementation strategies that accommodate the needs and preferences of diverse populations.

scholarly journals Pain Assessment in Foot and Ankle Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0006
Author(s):  
Meghan Kelly ◽  
David Bernstein ◽  
Ashlee MacDonald ◽  
John Ketz ◽  
Adolph Flemister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Pain Level ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Moderate Correlation ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
And Function

Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: The ability to accurately quantify a patient’s pain pre-operatively is advantageous in the preparation of post-operative expectations and pain management. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a popular method to identify patient pain level. Other patient reported outcomes are being collected, such as the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and has been suggested to be more accurate in measuring pain as well as physical function. The aim of this study was to 1) determine whether NPRS or PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) demonstrates a stronger association with physical function as determined by PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and 2) to determine which method better predicts post-surgical pain in a population of elective surgical foot and ankle patients. Methods: Prospective PROMIS PF, PI and NPRS (0-10) data was obtained for common foot and ankle elective surgical procedures (CPT codes 27698, 27870, 28285, 28289, 28300, 28705, 28730, 28750) from a multi-surgeon foot and ankle clinic between February 2015 until November 2017. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to determine the relationship between NPRS (0-10) and PROMIS domains (PI, PF) pre and post-operatively. Correlations were considered high (> 0.7), high moderate (0.6-0.69), moderate (0.4-0.6) or weak (<0.4). Results: A total of 502 patients found to have complete data sets and > 6 month follow up were evaluated (74% women, mean age 54+/- SD, mean follow-up 14.4 months, range 6-34 months). Pearson correlation evaluation of NPRS and PI revealed a moderate correlation in the pre- and postoperative setting. There was a high moderate negative correlation between PI and PF t-scores pre and postoperatively suggesting more pain and less function. However, the negative correlation between NPRS and PF pre- and postoperatively was weak indicating a poor relationship between NPRS pain assessment and function. There was a moderate correlation between pre- and postoperative scores in all domains of PROMIS while the correlation between pre- and postoperative NPRS scores was weak. Conclusion: In a population of elective surgical foot and ankle patients, the use of both NPRS and PROMIS can be utilized to assess pain level, however the PROMIS PI domain demonstrated a stronger relationship with PROMIS PF than NPRS. Furthermore, only the PROMIS domains demonstrated at least a moderate correlation between pre- and post-operative scores. PROMIS PI provides superior assessment of pre- and post-operative physical function and prediction of post-operative pain. PROMIS PI can be used to gauge a patient’s pre-operative level of pain and function and aid the surgeon in guiding post-operative patient expectations and pain management.

Comparison Between Polyvinyl Alcohol Implant and Cheilectomy With Moberg Osteotomy for Hallux Rigidus

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 1031-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bopha Chrea ◽  
Stephanie K. Eble ◽  
Jonathan Day ◽  
Scott J. Ellis ◽  
Mark C. Drakos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Polyvinyl Alcohol ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel implant for the surgical management of hallux rigidus. Though recent studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of the implant, no study has compared outcomes following PVA implantation with those following traditional joint-preserving procedures for hallux rigidus, such as cheilectomy with Moberg osteotomy. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing cheilectomy and Moberg osteotomy, with or without PVA implant, at a single multisurgeon academic center. Our hypothesis was that the addition of the PVA implant would result in superior clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Methods: In total, 166 patients were identified who underwent cheilectomy and Moberg osteotomy with (PVACM; n = 72) or without (CM; n = 94) a PVA implant between January 2016 and December 2018 by 1 of 8 foot and ankle fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons at our institution. Of these patients, 60 PVACM and 73 CM patients had both baseline and minimum 1-year postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. The average time to survey follow-up was 14.5 months for PVACM patients and 15.6 months for CM patients. Retrospective chart review was performed to assess the incidence of postoperative complications and reoperations, with an average clinical follow-up of 27.7 (range, 16.0-46.4) months for PVACM patients and 36.6 (range, 18.6-47.8) months for CM patients. Results: Both PVACM and CM cohorts demonstrated significant improvement in the PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, Pain Intensity, and Global Physical Health domains when comparing preoperative and postoperative scores within each group ( P < .01). When comparing scores between the PVACM and CM cohorts, preoperative scores were similar, while CM patients demonstrated significantly higher postoperative Physical Function (51.8 ± 8.7 vs 48.8 ± 8.0; P = .04) and significantly lower Pain Intensity (39.9 ± 8.3 vs 43.4 ± 8.7; P = .02) scores. The pre- to postoperative change in Physical Function was also significantly greater for CM patients (7.1 ± 8.5 vs 3.6 ± 6.2; P = .011). In the PVACM group, there were 3 revisions (5%), 1 reimplantation, 1 conversion to arthrodesis, and 1 revision to correct hyperdorsiflexion. In the CM group, there was 1 revision (1.4%), a conversion to arthrodesis ( P = .21). Other postoperative complications included persistent pain (7 out of 60 PVACM patients [11.7%] and 8 out of 73 CM patients [11.0%]; P = .90) and infection in 3 PVACM patients (5%) and no CM patients ( P = .05). Conclusion: Though our results generally support the safety and utility of the PVA implant as previously established by the clinical trial, at 1 to 2 years of follow-up, CM without a PVA implant may provide equivalent or better relief compared with a PVACM procedure, while avoiding potential risks associated with the implant. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

scholarly journals Postoperative Outcomes and Complications in Hallux Rigidus: A Comparison Between Polyvinyl Alcohol Implant and Cheilectomy with Moberg Osteotomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0017
Author(s):  
Bopha Chrea ◽  
Jonathan Day ◽  
Stephanie K. Eble ◽  
Megan Reilly ◽  
Jonathan T. Deland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Polyvinyl Alcohol ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Proper Patient Selection ◽  
Patient Reported

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of a polvinvyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel implant (Cartiva, Elmsford, NY) for surgical treatment of hallux rigidus, or degenerative arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (1st MTP) joint. While studies have demonstrated the safety and usability of PVA implant, clinical outcomes following hemiarthroplasty with the PVA have not yet been compared to that of traditional joint-preserving procedures such as cheilectomy with Moberg osteotomy in the treatment of hallux rigidus. The purpose of this study is to compare patient-reported outcomes and postoperative complications between PVA hemiarthroplasty and cheilectomy with Moberg osteotomy, with the hypothesis that the addition of PVA would result in superior clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients were retrospectively identified who underwent hallux rigidus correction by one of seven Foot and Ankle fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons between March 2016 and November 2018. Out of 162 patients, a total of 133 patients constituted our study cohort after excluding patients with insufficient follow-up. Of the 133, 60 patients (mean age 57.2 years) were treated with combination PVA, cheilectomy, and Moberg osteotomy (PCM) and 73 patients (mean age 54.1) were treated with cheilectomy and Moberg (CM) alone. Both preoperative as well as minimum 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome scores (PROMIS) were compared between the two cohorts. Chart review was performed to compare rates of revision and complications. Results: Average time to follow-up was 14.5 months for PCM and 15.6 for CM groups. Both PCM and CM cohorts demonstrated significant improvement in PROMIS scores, with the CM group demonstrating significantly greater increase in Physical Function (7.14 +- 8.48 vs 3.58 +- 6.24, p=0.01). While preoperative scores were comparable, postoperatively the CM group had a significantly higher average Physical Function (51.8 +- 8.7 vs 48.8 +- 8.0, p=0.04) and lower Pain Intensity (39.9 +- 8.3 vs 43.4 +- 8.7, p=0.02). There were 2 cases of revision with re-implantation and 1 case of conversion to arthrodesis in the PCM group. There was 1 case of conversion to PVA in the CM group. Three patients who underwent PCM had a documented postoperative infection requiring antibiotics. Conclusion: Our data suggests that the addition of polyvinyl alcohol implant in the treatment of hallux rigidus results in significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes. However, patient-reported physical function may not be up to par at minimum 1-year follow-up compared to cheilectomy and Moberg osteotomy alone. In addition, while incidence was low in our cohort, revision of the implant as well as conversion to arthrodesis remain possible complications of PVA. Therefore, we believe that proper patient selection is recommended when considering surgical treatment options for hallux rigidus. [Table: see text]

Subtalar Fusion for Correction of Forefoot Abduction in Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

2020 ◽  
pp. 193864002095105
Author(s):  
James P. Davies ◽  
Xiaoyue Ma ◽  
Jonathan Garfinkel ◽  
Matthew Roberts ◽  
Mark Drakos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Subtalar Fusion ◽  
Patient Reported

Background Correction of talonavicular uncoverage (TNU) in adult-acquired flatfoot deformities (AAFD) can be a challenge. Lateral column lengthening (LCL) traditionally is utilized to address this. The primary study objective is examining stage II AAFD patients and determining if correction can be achieved with subtalar fusion (STF) comparable to LCL. Methods Following institutional review board approval, retrospective chart review performed identifying patients meeting criteria for stage IIB AAFD who underwent either STF with concomitant flatfoot procedures (but not LCL) to correct TNU, or who underwent LCL as part of their flatfoot reconstruction. Patients indicated for STF had one or more of the following: higher body mass index (BMI), were older, had greater deformity, lateral impingement pain, intraoperative spring ligament hyperlaxity. Patients without 1-year follow-up or compete records were excluded. All other patients were included. A total of 27 isolated STFs identified, along with 143 who underwent LCL. Pre-/postoperative radiographic parameters obtained as well as PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) and FAOS (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score) scores. Radiographic and patient reported outcomes both preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up evaluated for both groups. Results STF patients were older ( P < .05), with higher BMIs ( P < .004). STF had significantly worse TNU ( P < .001) than LCL patients, and average change in STF TNU was larger than LCL change postoperatively ( P = .006), after adjusting for age, BMI, gender. PROMIS STF improvement reached statistical significance in Physical Function (P 0.011), for FAOS Pain (P 0.025) and Function ( P = 0.04). Conclusions STF can be used in appropriately indicated patients to correct flatfoot deformity without compromising radiographic or clinical, correcting not only hindfoot valgus, but also talonavicular uncoverage (TNU) and corresponding medial arch collapse. Levels of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective chart review comparison study (case control)

scholarly journals Functional Outcomes and Return To Sport With Extraarticular Plating Of Lisfranc Injuries In Athletes

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0038
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Jones ◽  
Arthur R. McDowell ◽  
Samuel O. Ewalefo ◽  
Monique C. Chambers ◽  
Dwayne Carney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
P Value ◽  
Dorsal Plate ◽  
Lisfranc Joint ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Lisfranc Injuries

Objectives: Lisfranc injuries are increasingly common among athletes. Tarsometatarsal joint injuries often damage the articular cartilage and increase predisposition for post-traumatic arthritis and functional deformity of the midfoot. Injury-related morbidity in athletes has substantial consequences such as decreased performance and earlier retirement from sports. While open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) has been established as the standard of care for unstable Lisfranc injuries, there is currently no consensus regarding the optimal technique for stabilization. Extra-articular fixation has been described as a reasonable technique for Lisfranc joint stabilization due to avoidance of iatrogenic articular disruption and subsequent morbidity. The purpose of this study was to assess the pre- and post-operative patient-reported outcomes of athletes with Lisfranc injuries following ORIF using an extra-articular dorsal locking plate. Methods: Following Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, data was collected prospectively using an institution-based patient-reported outcomes registry. The registry was queried for patients who had undergone open treatment for tarsometatarsal dislocation (CPT 28615) between April 2015 and August 2018. Medical records were reviewed for the following criteria: athlete, 15 - 45 years of age, Lisfranc injury, ORIF, extra-articular dorsal locking plate, and completion of both pre- and post-operative outcomes surveys. 10 athletes were identified. The surveys used were as follows: VAPS, PASS, PROMIS-M, PROMIS-P, SF12-M, SF12-P, FAAM-ADL and FAAM-Sports. A comparison of pre- and post-operative outcomes was performed using paired t-tests. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value <0.05. Results: 10 athletes (5 male, 5 female) with an average age of 18.2 years were analyzed. Sports included football, gymnastics, soccer, hockey, and basketball. Competition levels included high school and college. All athletes had scheduled hardware removal between 3 - 5 months (average 4.4 months) after the initial ORIF. The FAAM-ADL scores (Δ42.49, p <0.0174) improved significantly at 6-months follow-up. The improvement of FAAM-ADL scores continued to trend positively for up to 1-year post-operatively; however, there was insufficient data to analyze for significance. There was no statistical significance observed between pre- and post-operative VAPS, PASS, PROMIS-M, PROMIS-P, SF12-M, SF12-P and FAAM-Sports scores at 6-months follow-up. 100% of athletes returned to sport at an average of 6 months. Conclusion: In athletes, extra-articular dorsal plate fixation of the Lisfranc joint demonstrates improvement in post-operative patient reports of function. Broad-statistical significance across all patient-reported measures was likely limited due to the number of participants. Patient-reported outcomes may serve as a guide to assess athlete progress during the post-operative period. Further studies are needed to compare the long-term outcomes of Lisfranc injuries in athletes following various methods of fixation.

scholarly journals Long-term Follow-up of Lisfranc Injuries Treated With Open Reduction Internal Fixation Patient-Reported Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 247301142110394
Author(s):  
Kempland C. Walley ◽  
Derek J. Semaan ◽  
Ronit Shah ◽  
Christopher Robbins ◽  
David M. Walton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Function ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Lisfranc Injuries

Background: There remains a paucity of data regarding long-term patient-reported outcomes following Lisfranc injuries. We sought to collect long-term clinical outcome data following Lisfranc injuries using PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) and visual analog scale–foot and ankle (VAS-FA). Methods: A chart review was performed to identify all patients who had surgical treatment of an acute Lisfranc injury at our institution from 2005 to 2014. Of the 45 patients identified, we were able to recruit 19 for a follow-up clinic visit consisting of physical examination, administration of questionnaires addressing pain and medication usage, radiographs, and completion of outcome surveys including PROMIS-Physical Function and visual analog scale–foot and ankle. Results: There were 14 female and 5 male patients enrolled in the study with a mean time of 6.25 years from the time of injury. Within this cohort, the mean PROMIS-PF score was 52.4±8.2 and the mean VAS–foot and ankle score was 76.6±22.3. Conclusion: We report satisfactory long-term patient-reported outcomes using PROMIS-PF and VAS-FA. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document