operative fixation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

218
(FIVE YEARS 68)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e239594
Author(s):  
Jeffrey P Nadwodny ◽  
George Pujalte ◽  
Tais Garcia de Oliveira Bertasi ◽  
Tamara Huff

Stress fractures are injuries frequently seen in high-performance athletes, especially runners. In the femur, the most commonly affected locations are the femoral neck, condylar area and proximal shaft. Intertrochanteric fractures are much more common in the elderly population, especially among those with osteoporosis, but they can also be a result of high-energy repetitive mechanisms. We present a case of an intertrochanteric stress fracture in a young male runner. The diagnosis was suspected after persistent pain following his first marathon, and it was confirmed with an MRI. Operative fixation of the fracture was performed 22 days after the pain started, which allowed the patient to return to his activities, including 50 km marathon 4 months following the surgery.


Author(s):  
M. Carolina Orbay ◽  
Jorge L. Orbay

AbstractGreater understanding of specific fracture patterns following distal radius fractures has arisen with the advent of volar plating. The volar marginal fragment (VMF) is a small peripheral piece of bone which is critical to carpal stability. Failure to achieve good fixation of the VMF can result in volar subluxation of the carpus and distal radioulnar joint instability. Due to its small, distal nature, this fragment can be easily missed and difficult to fix. Loss of reduction of the VMF following operative fixation presents specific challenges and surgical considerations dictated by patient characteristics and timing. Our goal of this review is to present a classification system for these failed VMFs which can help guide surgical treatment as well as expected outcomes.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072110405
Author(s):  
Nesar Ahmad Hasami ◽  
Diederik Pieter Johan Smeeing ◽  
Albert Frederik Pull ter Gunne ◽  
Michael John Richard Edwards ◽  
Stijn Diederik Nelen

Background: The exact benefit of locking plates over nonlocking plates in patients with lateral malleolus fractures remains unclear. The primary aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of locking plates vs nonlocking plates in patients with a lateral malleolus fracture. The secondary aims were to compare the number of complications and hardware removals and to compare whether results differed for older patients and for patients treated with anatomical locking plates. Methods: The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were searched for studies comparing locking plates with nonlocking plates in patients with fixated lateral malleolus fractures. All included studies were assessed on their methodologic quality using the MINORS. Subgroup analyses were performed on older patients and patients treated with anatomical locking plates. Results: A total of 11 studies were included. The meta-analysis showed that functional outcome did not differ between patients treated with locking plates and nonlocking plates (MD 2.38, 95% CI −2.71 to 7.46). No difference in both complication rate (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.74-1.63) and the amount of hardware removals (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.52-1.14) was found. Even after analyzing older patients and patients treated with anatomical locking plates, no benefit was shown. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates no clear benefit in selecting locking plates over nonlocking plates in the treatment of lateral malleolus fractures. Clinical Relevance: Locking plates are increasingly being used in the treatment of lateral malleolus fractures. Biomechanical studies have shown an increased stability with use of locking vs nonlocking plates. This clinical review does not support a benefit of use of locking plates for these fractures.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameen Barghi ◽  
Philip Hanna ◽  
Nelson Merchan ◽  
Aron Lechtig ◽  
Christopher Haggerty ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Brown ◽  
A Gaukroger ◽  
M Raza ◽  
R Sturley ◽  
M Arnander

Abstract Aim Neck of femur fractures (NOFs) are synonymous with frailty, and successful outcomes are achieved with operative fixation. The United Kingdom’s General Medical Council guidance governing consent highlights the importance of thorough pre-operative discussion of risk with the patient. We aimed to audit consenting practices in NOF patients within our unit against the British Orthopaedic Association’s (BOA) criteria, with the addition of delirium as a risk factor. Method In cycle one all operatively managed NOFs over a two-month period in October-November 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Consent forms 1 (CF1) and 4 (CF4) were assessed against BOA-endorsed criteria. Our intervention included a standardised sticker detailing 14 important risks was introduced and a departmental seminar on delirium. A second cycle was undertaken from August-October 2020 to close the audit loop Results No consent form documented all BOA-approved risk factors in cycle one (N = 35). Of cycle two’s 35 patients, 70.8% CF1 were completed using the novel sticker. All of these had 100% BOA-approved risk documentation. Consent forms without the sticker in cycle two documented 9/14 risks (mean value). No CF4 had any risks documented in either cycle. Delirium was documented in 51% in total and in 75% patients with CF1. Delirium documentation improved from 2.9% in cycle one to 51.4% in cycle two. Conclusions Clear lapses in operative consenting processes were identified, especially regarding delirium and CF4 documentation. The introduction of a novel consent sticker drastically improved compliance with BOA guidance for CF1. Recognition and departmental education regarding delirium significantly reduced incidence between cycles.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Prokopenko ◽  
Y Verma

Abstract Introduction Hand fractures are a common injury resulting in significant morbidity if managed incorrectly. The final outcome is determined by the initial injury but is also affected by timely and appropriate intervention. The British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) national guidelines recommend that when operative fixation is first choice, surgery should occur within 7-days of injury or within 72-hours when conservative management fails. Method We assessed compliance with BSSH closed hand fracture guidelines retrospectively using electronic patient records. Interventions involved department-wide education of national BSSH guidelines alongside suggestion of a dedicated closed hand fracture list. A sporadic WALANT list staffed by hand fellows was provided. The efficacy of the interventions was re-audited five months later. Results The first and second cycles included 100 and 56 cases respectively. Compliance improved between the two cycles from 59% to 75% when operative management was first choice. Average number of days until operative management was carried out, when operative fixation was first choice, improved from 7.47 to 5.44 between the two cycles. 23/156 (15%) cases underwent operative management on the additional list, where overall compliance was 78%. Conclusions Departmental education and the additional operating list improved compliance to BSSH guidelines. Education of staff involved in the management of closed hand fractures should continue regularly, especially considering the frequent rotation of trainee doctors. Patients should be provided with information leaflets to promote early presentation. The key intervention to improve compliance with national guidelines however remains the provision of a weekly closed hand fracture theatre list.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Yazdan Raji ◽  
Scott M. LaTulip ◽  
Navid Faraji ◽  
Sarah J. DeLozier ◽  
Heather A. Vallier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document