scholarly journals Contribution of First Tarsometatarsal Joint Fusion to Deformity Correction in the Treatment of Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0018
Author(s):  
Jonathan Day ◽  
Matthew S. Conti ◽  
Nicholas Williams ◽  
Scott J. Ellis ◽  
Jonathan T. Deland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Radiographic Parameters ◽  
Metatarsal Angle ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: Severe adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is often associated with painful medial column collapse at the naviculocuneiform (NC) joint. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of first tarsometatarsal (1st TMT) fusion combined with subtalar fusion in correcting deformity at this joint. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients (41 feet) who underwent 1st TMT and subtalar (ST) fusion as part of a flatfoot reconstructive procedure. We assessed six radiographic parameters both preoperatively and at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively, including talonavicular (TN) coverage angle, lateral talo-first metatarsal angle, lateral talocalcaneal angle, calcaneal pitch, hindfoot moment arm, and a newly defined navicular-cuneiform incongruency angle (NCIA). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum 1 year follow-up. Results: The NCIA demonstrated excellent interobserver reliability, with no significant change between pre- and postoperative measurements. All other radiographic parameters, except calcaneal pitch, demonstrated statistically significant improvement postoperatively (p <0.01). Overall, patients had statistically significant improvement in all PROMIS domains (p <0.01), except for depression. Worsening NC deformity was not associated with worse patient-reported outcomes. Conclusion: Our data suggests that when addressing collapse of the medial arch in patients with AAFD, fusion of the 1st TMT joint in combination with other procedures leads to acceptable radiographic and clinical outcomes. There was no change in deformity at the NC joint at short-term follow-up, and patients achieved significant improvement in multiple PROMIS domains. Based on our findings, deformity through the NC joint does not significantly impact clinical outcomes. In addition, the NCIA was established as a reliable radiographic parameter that can be used to assess NC deformity in the presence of talonavicular and/or 1st TMT fusion. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Contribution of First-Tarsometatarsal Joint Fusion to Deformity Correction in the Treatment of Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 247301142092732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Day ◽  
Matthew S. Conti ◽  
Nicholas Williams ◽  
Scott J. Ellis ◽  
Jonathan T. Deland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Radiographic Parameters ◽  
Metatarsal Angle ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Background: Severe adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is often associated with painful medial column collapse at the naviculocuneiform (NC) joint. However, many surgeons surgically correct the deformity without directly addressing this joint. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of first-tarsometatarsal (TMT) fusion combined with subtalar fusion in correcting deformity at the NC joint. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients (41 feet) who underwent first-TMT and subtalar (ST) fusion as part of a flatfoot reconstructive procedure. We assessed 6 radiographic parameters both preoperatively and at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively, including talonavicular (TN) coverage angle, lateral talo–first metatarsal angle, lateral talocalcaneal angle, calcaneal pitch, hindfoot moment arm, and a newly defined navicular-cuneiform incongruency angle (NCIA). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Results: The NCIA demonstrated excellent interobserver reliability, with no significant change between pre- and postoperative measurements. All other radiographic parameters, except calcaneal pitch, demonstrated statistically significant improvement postoperatively ( P < .01). Overall, patients had statistically significant improvement in all PROMIS domains ( P < .01), except for depression. Worsening NC deformity was not associated with worse patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: Our data suggest that when addressing painful collapse of the medial arch in patients with AAFD, fusion of the first-TMT joint in combination with other procedures leads to acceptable radiographic and clinical outcomes. There was no change in deformity at the NC joint in our patient cohort at short-term follow-up, and patients achieved significant improvement in multiple PROMIS domains. Although TMT fusion had no effect on NC deformity, residual or worsening NC deformity did not significantly affect clinical outcomes. In addition, the NCIA was found to be a reliable radiographic parameter to assess NC deformity in the presence of talonavicular and/or first-TMT fusion. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

scholarly journals Outcomes after Tibiocalcaneonavicular Ligament Reconstruction in Stage IIB and Stage IV Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0036
Author(s):  
Rusheel Nayak ◽  
Milap Patel ◽  
Anish R. Kadakia
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Deltoid Ligament ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Spring Ligament ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Radiographic Parameters ◽  
Metatarsal Angle ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Category: Hindfoot; Ankle; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: The tibiocalcaneonavicular ligament (TCNL) is formed from the confluence of the superficial deltoid ligament and the superomedial spring ligament. In advanced flexible adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD), progressive strain on the TCNL can lead to spring ligament tears, deltoid insufficiency, and eventual medial peritalar instability. Historically, medial peritalar instability was corrected using calcaneal osteotomy in conjunction with isolated spring or deltoid reconstruction. A recent study (Brodell et al.) demonstrated the efficacy of TCNL reconstruction in patients with medial peritalar instability. The purpose of this study is to add to this literature using patient-reported and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing TCNL reconstruction. Patient-reported outcomes were collected using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) surveys. Methods: Sixteen patients (mean age 50.25 years; 11 female, 5 male) who underwent TCNL reconstruction were prospectively identified. TCNL reconstruction was indicated for stage IIB patients (n=13) with large spring ligament tears (>1.5cm on MRI or intraoperatively) or if osseous correction did not provide adequate talonavicular joint correction. TCNL reconstruction was indicated in stage IV patients (n=3) if deltoid reconstruction required additional medial stabilization. No patients underwent lateral column lengthening osteotomies. PROMIS scores were obtained at baseline and at minimum 12-months follow-up (average 16 months). Surgical success was determined using minimum clinically important differences (MCID), defined as improvement greater than one-half the standard deviation of each pre-operative PROMIS domain (PF: +2.9 and PI: -2.5). Pre- and post-operative radiographic parameters were measured: talonavicular uncoverage angle, talonavicular uncoverage percentage, AP talo-first metatarsal angle, Meary’s angle, and medial cuneiform height (MCH). Correlation coefficients determined the relationship between radiographic parameters and PROMIS scores. Results: PROMIS PF scores improved significantly from 38.1+-5.8 to 44.1+-7.1 (p=0.0087). PROMIS PI scores improved significantly from 62.9+-5.1 to 52.3+-8.9 (p=0.0025). Seventy-nine and 77 percent of patients had successful surgeries, as defined by MCIDs in the PROMIS PF and PI domains, respectively. Talonavicular uncoverage percentage and Meary’s angle improved significantly from 34.4+-13.4 to 26.3+-9.9 percent (p=0.0360) and 19.2+-8.8 to 15.3+-6.2 degrees (p=0.0089), respectively. Talonavicular uncoverage angle improved from 29.3+-9.6 to 23.3+-8.0 degrees (p=0.0562), AP talo-first metatarsal angle improved from 15.2+-10.2 to 10.4+-9.0 degrees (p=0.0555), and MCH improved from 13.5+-6.2 to 15.9+-4.8 millimeters (p=0.1374). Post- operative MCH correlated significantly with post-operative PROMIS PF scores (r=0.5941; p=0.0152). Change in AP talo-first metatarsal angle correlated significantly with change in PROMIS PI scores (r=0.5682; p=0.0427). No other correlations were significant. Conclusion: Patients with stage IIB and stage IV AAFD who undergo TCNL reconstructions have excellent patient-reported and radiographic outcomes. Reconstruction of the medial longitudinal arch, as measured by post-operative MCH, is associated with higher post-operative functionality. Surgical correction of midfoot abduction, as measured by change in the AP talo-first metatarsal angle after surgery, is associated with improvements in pain. In patients with medial peritalar instability, TCNL reconstruction can be a valuable technique to correct the sagittal arch, prevent excessive midfoot abduction, and improve pain and functionality.

scholarly journals PROMIS and FAAM Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Foot and Ankle Orthopedics

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man Hung ◽  
Judith F. Baumhauer ◽  
Frank W. Licari ◽  
Maren W. Voss ◽  
Jerry Bounsanga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Minimum Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Diagnostic Study ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Meaningful Change ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Level I

Background: Establishing score points that reflect meaningful change from the patient perspective is important for interpreting patient-reported outcomes. This study estimated the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) values of 2 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Sports subscale within a foot and ankle orthopedic population. Methods: Patients seen for foot and ankle conditions at an orthopedic clinic were administered the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) v1.2, the PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) v1.1, and the FAAM Sports at baseline and all follow-up visits. MCID estimation was conducted using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. Results: A total of 3069 patients, mean age of 51 years (range = 18-94), were included. The MCIDs for the PROMIS PF ranged from approximately 3 to 30 points (median = 11.3) depending on the methods being used. The MCIDs ranged from 3 to 25 points (median = 8.9) for the PROMIS PI, and from 9 to 77 points (median = 32.5) for the FAAM Sports. Conclusions: This study established a range of MCIDs in the PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, and FAAM Sports indicating meaningful change in patient condition. MCID values were consistent across follow-up periods, but were different across methods. Values below the 25th percentile of MCIDs may be useful for low-risk clinical decisions. Midrange values (eg, near the median) should be used for high stakes decisions in clinical practice (ie, surgery referrals). The MCID values within the interquartile range should be utilized for most decision making. Level of Evidence: Level I, diagnostic study, testing of previously developed diagnostic measure on consecutive patients with reference standard applied.

138. Cervical radiographic parameters and patient reported outcomes following Harrington instrumentation: a minimum 35-year follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. S67-S68
Author(s):  
Noorullah Maqsoodi ◽  
Jarren A. Section ◽  
Adan Omar ◽  
Aron Sulovari ◽  
Paul T. Rubery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Harrington Instrumentation ◽  
Radiographic Parameters ◽  
Patient Reported

Prescription Opioids and Patient-Reported Outcomes and Satisfaction After Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery

Hand ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 155894472110643
Author(s):  
Pragna N. Shetty ◽  
Kavya K. Sanghavi ◽  
Mihriye Mete ◽  
Aviram M. Giladi
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Prescription Opioid ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Amount of opioid use correlates poorly with procedure-related pain; however, prescription limits raise concerns about inadequate pain control and impacts on patient-reported quality indicators. There remain no consistent guidelines for postoperative pain management after carpal tunnel release (CTR). We sought to understand how postoperative opioid use impacts patient-reported outcomes after CTR. Methods: This is a pragmatic cohort study using prospectively collected data from all adult patients undergoing uncomplicated primary CTR over 17 months at our center. Patients were categorized as having received or not received a postoperative opioid prescription, and then as remaining on a prescription opioid at 2-week follow-up or not. Questionnaires were completed before surgery and at 2-week follow-up. We collected brief Michigan Hand questionnaire (bMHQ) score, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health score, satisfaction, and pain score. Results: Of 505 included patients, 405 received a postoperative prescription and 67 continued use at 2-weeks. These 67 patients reported lower bMHQ, lower satisfaction, and higher postoperative pain compared to those that discontinued. Multivariable regressions showed that receiving postoperative prescriptions did not significantly influence outcomes or satisfaction. However, remaining on the prescription at 2 weeks was associated with significantly lower bMHQ scores, particularly in patients reporting less pain. Conclusions: Patients remaining on a prescription after CTR reported worse outcomes compared to those who discontinued. Unexpectedly, the widest bMHQ score gap was seen across patients reporting lowest pain scores. Further research into this high-risk subgroup is needed to guide policy around using pain and patient-reported outcomes as quality measures. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Comparison Between Polyvinyl Alcohol Implant and Cheilectomy With Moberg Osteotomy for Hallux Rigidus

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 1031-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bopha Chrea ◽  
Stephanie K. Eble ◽  
Jonathan Day ◽  
Scott J. Ellis ◽  
Mark C. Drakos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Polyvinyl Alcohol ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel implant for the surgical management of hallux rigidus. Though recent studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of the implant, no study has compared outcomes following PVA implantation with those following traditional joint-preserving procedures for hallux rigidus, such as cheilectomy with Moberg osteotomy. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing cheilectomy and Moberg osteotomy, with or without PVA implant, at a single multisurgeon academic center. Our hypothesis was that the addition of the PVA implant would result in superior clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Methods: In total, 166 patients were identified who underwent cheilectomy and Moberg osteotomy with (PVACM; n = 72) or without (CM; n = 94) a PVA implant between January 2016 and December 2018 by 1 of 8 foot and ankle fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons at our institution. Of these patients, 60 PVACM and 73 CM patients had both baseline and minimum 1-year postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. The average time to survey follow-up was 14.5 months for PVACM patients and 15.6 months for CM patients. Retrospective chart review was performed to assess the incidence of postoperative complications and reoperations, with an average clinical follow-up of 27.7 (range, 16.0-46.4) months for PVACM patients and 36.6 (range, 18.6-47.8) months for CM patients. Results: Both PVACM and CM cohorts demonstrated significant improvement in the PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, Pain Intensity, and Global Physical Health domains when comparing preoperative and postoperative scores within each group ( P < .01). When comparing scores between the PVACM and CM cohorts, preoperative scores were similar, while CM patients demonstrated significantly higher postoperative Physical Function (51.8 ± 8.7 vs 48.8 ± 8.0; P = .04) and significantly lower Pain Intensity (39.9 ± 8.3 vs 43.4 ± 8.7; P = .02) scores. The pre- to postoperative change in Physical Function was also significantly greater for CM patients (7.1 ± 8.5 vs 3.6 ± 6.2; P = .011). In the PVACM group, there were 3 revisions (5%), 1 reimplantation, 1 conversion to arthrodesis, and 1 revision to correct hyperdorsiflexion. In the CM group, there was 1 revision (1.4%), a conversion to arthrodesis ( P = .21). Other postoperative complications included persistent pain (7 out of 60 PVACM patients [11.7%] and 8 out of 73 CM patients [11.0%]; P = .90) and infection in 3 PVACM patients (5%) and no CM patients ( P = .05). Conclusion: Though our results generally support the safety and utility of the PVA implant as previously established by the clinical trial, at 1 to 2 years of follow-up, CM without a PVA implant may provide equivalent or better relief compared with a PVACM procedure, while avoiding potential risks associated with the implant. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Idiopathic Flexible Flatfoot Deformity Reconstruction in the Young Patient

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 247301142093798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Day ◽  
Jaeyoung Kim ◽  
Matthew S. Conti ◽  
Nicholas Williams ◽  
Jonathan T. Deland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Function ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Posterior Tibial Tendon ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Radiographic Parameters ◽  
Metatarsal Angle ◽  
Flexible Flatfoot ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Operative correction of flatfoot deformity has been well studied in the older population. There is a subset of younger patients without congenital foot deformity that also develop a collapsing flatfoot. However, assessment of outcomes across age groups is limited, especially in the young demographic. The purpose of our study was to compare operative outcomes of flatfoot reconstruction between these 2 age groups. Methods: Seventy-six feet (41 left, 35 right) in 71 patients who underwent flexible flatfoot reconstruction were divided into 2 groups based on age: ≤30 years (n = 22) and >30 years (n = 54). Exclusion criteria included congenital causes of flatfoot (tarsal coalition, vertical talus, overcorrected clubfoot). Average age was 20.8 years (range, 14-30) and 55.4 years (range, 35-74) in the younger and older cohorts, respectively. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) scores were compared. Five radiographic parameters were assessed pre- and postoperatively: talonavicular coverage angle, lateral talo–first metatarsal angle, lateral talocalcaneal angle, calcaneal pitch, and hindfoot moment arm. Procedures performed and incidence of minor (removal of symptomatic hardware) and major (revision) reoperations were compared. Results: Younger patients were less likely to undergo flexor digitorum longus transfer, first tarsometatarsal fusion, spring ligament repair, and posterior tibial tendon repair (all P < .05). Both younger and older cohorts demonstrated significant improvement in multiple PROMIS domains at an average follow-up of 30.6 (range, 24-44) and 26.8 (range, 24-45) months, respectively ( P = .07). Younger patients demonstrated significantly higher pre- and postoperative Physical Function (mean difference postoperatively, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-7.8; P = .03). There were no differences in radiographic parameters postoperatively. There were 8 (36.4%) reoperations (all minor) in the younger group, and 21 (38.9%) reoperations (6 major, 15 minor) in the older group ( P = .84). Conclusion: Our data suggest that age may play a role in clinical outcomes, procedures indicated, and subsequent corrective reoperations. Younger patients maintained greater physical function with comparable radiographic correction, with less frequent indication for tendon transfers, arthrodesis, and additional corrective surgeries. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

scholarly journals A Mixed Methods Analysis of Acute Upper Extremity Pain as Measured by the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System

2019 ◽  
Vol 185 (5-6) ◽  
pp. e870-e877
Author(s):  
Robin L Tennekoon ◽  
Enrique V Smith-Forbes ◽  
Yvette Woods
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Outcomes Measurement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Measurement Information System

Abstract Introduction Chronic pain affects U.S. service member’s (SMs) more disproportionately than individuals in the general public. SMs have unique cultural pressures to ignore or deny acute pain; therefore, the beliefs and behaviors of this group may cause them to self-report their acute pain in a specific manner. This study evaluated the strength of the relationship of the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) upper extremity computer adaptive test (CAT) and assessed U.S. active duty SMs experience of acute pain and function compared to the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH). In addition, the PROMIS pain interference CAT, PROMIS pain behavior CAT, and PROMIS anxiety CAT were correlated to the PROMIS upper extremity CAT and QuickDASH questionnaires. Materials and Methods This mixed methods, sequential, explanatory study included a convenience sample of 26 participants from two occupational therapy clinics. Participants were administered five self-report questionnaires at initial evaluation and at follow up (30–90 day). At follow up, 12 participants completed a semi-structured interview. Categorical variables were summarized using percentages and analyzed using a chi-square goodness of fit test. A Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the linear relationship between the QuickDASH and specified PROMIS questionnaires. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Brooke Army Medical Center, reference number C.2017.173d. Results The initial and follow up scores from the self-report questionnaires demonstrated a good to excellent correlation between the PROMIS upper extremity CAT and the QuickDASH (r = –0.65; r = –0.81; p &lt; 0.001). Qualitative data were gathered during a semi-structured interview of 12 participants after the follow up and were analyzed using thematic analysis. Three themes emerged from qualitative analysis of data: (1) impact of military culture, (2) psychosocial effects of acute pain, and (3) therapist contributions to disability awareness. Conclusions This study demonstrates several cultural and psychosocial influences concerning the experience of SMs with acute UE disability and pain, which were not previously reported for this population.

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Structural Autograft for Large or Cystic Talar Dome Osteochondral Lesions

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 549-555
Author(s):  
Todd Kim ◽  
Andrew Haskell
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Distal Tibia ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Talar Dome ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Structural Bone Graft ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: While smaller talar dome osteochondral lesions (OCLs) are successfully treated with bone marrow stimulation techniques, the optimal treatment for large or cystic OCLs remains controversial. This study tested the hypothesis that transferring structural autograft bone from the distal tibia to the talus for large or cystic OCLs improves pain and function. Methods: Thirty-two patients with large or cystic OCLs underwent structural bone grafting from the ipsilateral distal tibia to the talar dome. Patients were assessed with subjective patient-centered tools and objective clinical outcomes. Average age was 48.6 ± 14.9 years, and average follow-up was 19.5 ± 13.3 months. Average lesion area was 86.2 ± 23.5 mm2, and average depth was 8.4 ± 3.0mm. Results: At final follow-up, improvement compared to preoperative scores was seen in American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (65.4 ± 21.2 to 86.9 ± 15.0, P < .05), Foot Function Index (48.9 ± 20.8 to 21.1 ± 18.9, P < .05), visual analog scale for pain (4.7 ± 3.0 to 1.4 ± 1.5, P < .05), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (40.4 ± 5.4 to 45.5 ± 7.4, P < .05) scores. There was no improvement in PROMIS pain interference (54.7 ± 18.1 to 52.4 ± 7.3, P > .05). Satisfaction with surgery was 8.4 ± 1.3/10, and 96% of patients would have the procedure again. Ninety-four percent of patients returned to work and/or play. One patient had a deep vein thrombosis 6 weeks postoperatively, and 1 patient underwent ankle fusion at 18 months postoperatively. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that structural bone graft harvested from the distal tibia transferred to the talus was a safe and effective treatment for large and cystic OCLs. Outcomes compare favorably to other described techniques for treatment of these injuries. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 281-294
Author(s):  
Eleonor Svantesson ◽  
Eric Hamrin Senorski ◽  
Kate E Webster ◽  
Jón Karlsson ◽  
Theresa Diermeier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Consensus Meeting ◽  
Comprehensive Assessment ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

PurposeA stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect for establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. The aim of this consensus statement was to establish what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed.MethodsTo establish a standardised assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, in June 2019. The group reached consensus on nine statements by using a modified Delphi method.ResultsIn general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into four robust categories—early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes, ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption, and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment following ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained re-injuries, validated knee-specific patient-reported outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaires. In the mid-term to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated.ConclusionThis consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment.Level of EvidenceLevel V.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document