Semiconductivity of steam generator tubing alloys in simulated crevice chemistries containing lead and sulphur

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.-H. Xia ◽  
Y. Behnamian ◽  
L. Yang ◽  
H. Fan ◽  
R.-K. Zhu ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Roussel ◽  
Leon Cizelj

The basis for determining the size of the random sample of tubes to be inspected in replacement steam generators is revisited in this paper. A procedure to estimate the maximum number of defective tubes left in the steam generator after no defective tubes have been detected in the randomly selected inspection sample is proposed. A Bayesian estimation is used to obtain closed-form solutions for uniform, triangular, and binomial prior densities describing the number of failed tubes in steam generators. It is shown that the particular way of selecting the random inspection sample (e.g., one sample from both SG, one sample from each SG, etc.) does not affect the results of the inspection and also the information obtained about the state of the uninspected tubing, as long as the inspected steam generators belong to the same population. Numerical examples further demonstrate two possible states of the knowledge existing before the inspection of the tubing. First, virtually no knowledge about the state of the steam generator tubing before the inspection is modeled using uniform and triangular prior densities. It is shown that the knowledge about the uninspected part of the tubing strongly depends on the size of the sample inspected. Further, even small inspection samples may significantly improve our knowledge about the uninspected part. On the other hand, rather strong belief on the state of the tubing prior to the inspection is modeled using binomial prior density. In this case, the knowledge about the uninspected part of the tubing is virtually independent on the size of the sample. Furthermore, it is shown qualitatively and quantitatively that such inspection brings no additional knowledge on the uninspected part of the tubing.


Author(s):  
Warren Bamford ◽  
John Hall

Service induced cracking in Alloy 600 has been known for a long time, having been first observed in the 1980’s in steam generator tubing and small bore piping, and later, in 1991, in reactor vessel control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) head penetrations. Other than steam generator tubing, which cracked within a few years of operation, the first Alloy 600 cracking was in base metal of Combustion Engineering small bore piping, followed closely by CE pressurizer heater sleeves. The first reactor vessel CRDM penetrations (base metal) to crack were in France, US plants found CRDM cracking several years later. Three plants have discovered weld metal cracking at the outlet nozzle to pipe weld region. This was the first known weld metal cracking. This paper will chronicle the development of service-induced cracking in these components, and compare the behavior of welds as opposed to base metal, from the standpoint of time to crack initiation, growth rate of cracks, and their impact on structural integrity. In addition, a discussion of potential future trends will be provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document