scholarly journals AMPH-IMA04: a revised Hypercard program to determine the name of an amphibole from chemical analyses according to the 2004 International Mineralogical Association scheme

2004 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 825-830 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mogessie ◽  
K. Ettinger ◽  
B. E. Leake
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microprobe ◽  
Association Scheme ◽  
Chemical Analyses ◽  
International Mineralogical Association ◽  
Mineralogical Association ◽  
Single Input ◽  
Input Format

AbstractIn 2004, the International Mineralogical Association (IMA) amended the IMA 97 amphibole classification and nomenclature scheme byadding a fifth group to include the recently discovered B(LiNa) amphiboles ferriwhittakeriite and ferri-ottoliniite, which cannot be fitted into the four major amphibole groups. New root-names such as sodic-pedrizite in the Mg-Fe-Mn-Li group and obertiite and dellaventuraite in the sodic group along with two new prefixes, parvo and magno have also been added. As result it has become necessary to modify the AMPH-IMA97 amphibole-naming program. The new program (AMPH-IMA04) allows single input or automatic input of as many amphibole analyses as are available following a set input format. Any of three different calculation schemes for dealing with an amphibole analysis can be chosen: (1) complete chemical analyses can be calculated to 24(O,OH,F,Cl); (2) analyses with determined FeO and Fe2O3, MnO and Mn2O3 but without H2O can be calculated to 23(O); and (3) electron microprobe analyses with only total Fe determined and without H2O can be calculated to 23(O) with IMA97-recommended normalization for Fe3+ and Fe2+ values. In addition a stoichiometric calculation of Mn2+ and Mn3+ is considered and implemented for the Mn-bearing sodic amphiboles in order to take care of electron microprobe analyses of such amphiboles where the total Mn is given as Mn2+.

Discreditation of tombarthite-(Y)

2018 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 1131-1139
Author(s):  
Henrik Friis
Keyword(s):  
Original Description ◽  
Chemical Analyses ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
History Museum ◽  
X Ray ◽  
International Mineralogical Association ◽  
Mineralogical Association ◽  
Fresh Material ◽  
Heating Scheme ◽  
Quantitative Chemical

ABSTRACTTombarthite-(Y) is discredited as a mineral species. No type material was available, but material used for the original description has been located and neotype material defined. The main reason for the erroneous description of tombarthite-(Y) is the result of chemical analyses being carried out on heated material, which removed elements such as C and F. New semi-quantitative chemical analyses show that at least F is present in the fresh material, but absent after a heating scheme identical to that of the original description. Modern powder X-ray diffraction methods (XRD) confirm that the material identified as tombarthite-(Y) is a mixture of metamict and crystalline phases. Consequently, what was known as tombarthite-(Y) is not a mixture of the same minerals in equal amounts in different samples, but mixtures of various minerals depending on the sample. The main minerals identified are thalénite-(Y), xenotime-(Y) and kainosite-(Y). The discreditation of tombarthite-(Y) relies on new analyses of a large number of samples from the collection of the Natural History Museum (NHM) in Oslo and has been approved by the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (proposal 16-K).

Jahnsite-(CaMnZn) from the Hagendorf-Süd pegmatite, Oberpfalz, Bavaria, and structural flexibility of jahnsite-group minerals

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 547-553
Author(s):  
Ian E. Grey ◽  
Erich Keck ◽  
Anthony R. Kampf ◽  
Colin M. MacRae ◽  
John D. Cashion ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microprobe ◽  
Empirical Formula ◽  
Structural Flexibility ◽  
Optical Orientation ◽  
Calculated Density ◽  
Nomenclature System ◽  
Group Mineral ◽  
International Mineralogical Association ◽  
Mineralogical Association ◽  
Orthogonal Orientation

AbstractJahnsite-(CaMnZn), CaMn2+Zn2Fe3+2(PO4)4(OH)2⋅8H2O, is a new jahnsite-group mineral associated with alteration of phosphophyllite at the Hagendorf-Süd pegmatite, Bavaria. It forms as thin yellow crusts and brown epitactic growths on altered phosphophyllite, both of which comprise lath-like crystals in orthogonal orientation, up to 100 μm long. The crystals contain intergrowths of jahnsite-(CaMnZn) and jahnsite-(CaMnMn) on a scale of ~50 μm. The calculated density is 2.87 g cm−3 based on the empirical formula. Optically it is biaxial (–), with α = 1.675(2), β = 1.686(2) and γ = 1.691(2) (white light). The calculated 2V is 68°. Dispersion could not be observed, and the optical orientation is Z = b. Pleochroism was imperceptible. Electron microprobe analyses together with results from Mössbauer spectroscopy gives the formula (Ca0.59Mn0.24)Σ0.83Mn(Zn0.74Mn2+0.48Mg0.18Fe2+0.13Fe3+0.47)Σ2Fe3+2(P0.995O4)4(OH)2.03(H2O)7.97.Jahnsite-(CaMnZn) is monoclinic, P2/a, with a = 15.059(1), b = 7.1885(6), c = 10.031(2) Å, β = 111.239(8)° and V = 1012.1(2) Å3. The recent International Mineralogical Association approved nomenclature system for jahnsite-group minerals was applied to establish jahnsite-(CaMnZn) from the empirical formula. The structural flexibility of jahnsite-group minerals to accommodate cations of quite different sizes in the X and M1 sites is discussed in terms of rotations about the 7 Å axis of two independent octahedra centred at the M3 sites.

The chemistry and cell parameters of omphacites and related pyroxenes

1969 ◽  
Vol 37 (285) ◽  
pp. 61-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Edgar ◽  
A. Mottana ◽  
N. D. Macrae
Keyword(s):  
Powder Diffraction ◽  
Electron Microprobe ◽  
Graphical Representation ◽  
Chemical Compositions ◽  
Chemical Analyses ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Cell Parameters ◽  
Cell Dimensions ◽  
Approximate Estimation

SummaryIn an attempt to correlate the chemical compositions and cell sizes of omphacites and related pyroxenes, the cell dimensions of fifty-five analysed pyroxenes have been determined, or taken from the literature. Twenty-two of the chemical analyses are new, nineteen of them being done by electron microprobe. Approximately two-thirds of the total number of analyses may be considered first class, the remainder are of doubtful or unknown quality. Cell parameters, determined by X-ray powder diffraction methods, have errors of 0·1 % for the majority of samples, although for some samples taken from the literature errors are unknown.The majority of methods of recalculating omphacite analyses into their end-member molecules are unsuitable for correlation of cell constants with chemistry, mainly due to the impossibility of graphical representation of more than three end-member molecules, and to the non-stoichiometry of these molecules. Using a modification of Tröger's (1962) method of recalculating chloromelanite analyses the present analyses have been recalculated into the diopside-jadeite-acmite and diopside-jadeite-hedenbergite molecules and compared with their determined cell parameters. Because of the gradations in all parameters between these end-member molecules, determination of compositions based on the cell parameters (a, b, c, vol, or β) can only be made within wide limits. However, using a method of projection of compositions from the acmite and hedenbergite apices to the diopside-jadeite join the ratios of diopside to jadeite can be determined for most samples to within ±5 mol%. As there are the most important constituents of most omphacites, this method permits an approximate estimation of omphacite compositions. From a knowledge of the cell sizes of the omphacite a rough indication of the conditions of formation of its host rock may also be obtained.

Classification of the minerals of the graftonite group

2018 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 1301-1306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank C. Hawthorne ◽  
Adam Pieczka
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Distinct Species ◽  
International Mineralogical Association ◽  
Coordination Numbers ◽  
Mineralogical Association ◽  
Strong Order

ABSTRACTA classification and nomenclature scheme has been approved by the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification for the minerals of the graftonite group. The crystal structures of these minerals have three distinct sites that are occupied by Fe2+, Mn2+and Ca2+. These sites have coordination numbers [8], [5] and [6], and these differences lead to very strong order of Fe2+, Mn2+and Ca2+over these sites. As a result of this strong order, the following compositions have been identified as distinct species: graftonite: FeFe2(PO4)2; graftonite-(Ca): CaFe2(PO4)2; graftonite-(Mn): MnFe2(PO4)2; beusite: MnMn2(PO4)2; and beusite-(Ca): CaMn2(PO4)2.

Potassic-jeanlouisite from Leucite Hill, Wyoming, USA, ideally K(NaCa)(Mg4Ti)Si8O22O2: the first species of oxo amphibole in the sodium–calcium subgroup

2019 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-593
Author(s):  
Roberta Oberti ◽  
Massimo Boiocchi ◽  
Frank C. Hawthorne ◽  
Giancarlo Della Ventura ◽  
Gunnar Färber
Keyword(s):  
Microprobe Analysis ◽  
Electron Microprobe Analysis ◽  
Structure Refinement ◽  
Crystal Structure Refinement ◽  
Unit Cell Parameters ◽  
X Ray ◽  
International Mineralogical Association ◽  
Cell Parameters ◽  
Mineralogical Association ◽  
Sodium Calcium

AbstractPotassic-jeanlouisite, ideally K(NaCa)(Mg4Ti)Si8O22O2, is the first characterised species of oxo amphibole related to the sodium–calcium group, and derives from potassic richterite via the coupled exchange CMg–1W${\rm OH}_{{\rm \ndash 2}}^{\ndash}{} ^{\rm C}{\rm Ti}_1^{{\rm 4 +}} {} ^{\rm W}\!{\rm O}_2^{2\ndash} $. The mineral and the mineral name were approved by the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification, IMA2018-050. Potassic-jeanlouisite was found in a specimen of leucite which is found in the lava layers, collected in the active gravel quarry on Zirkle Mesa, Leucite Hills, Wyoming, USA. It occurs as pale yellow to colourless acicular crystals in small vugs. The empirical formula derived from electron microprobe analysis and single-crystal structure refinement is: A(K0.84Na0.16)Σ1.00B(Ca0.93Na1.02Mg0.04${\rm Mn}_{{\rm 0}{\rm. 01}}^{2 +} $)Σ2.00C(Mg3.85${\rm Fe}_{{\rm 0}{\rm. 16}}^{2 +} $Ni0.01${\rm Fe}_{{\rm 0}{\rm. 33}}^{3 +} {\rm V}_{{\rm 0}{\rm. 01}}^{3 +} $Ti0.65)Σ5.01T(Si7.76Al0.09Ti0.15)Σ8.00O22W[O1.53F0.47]Σ2.00. The holotype crystal is biaxial (–), with α = 1.674(2), β = 1.688(2), γ = 1.698(2), 2Vmeas. = 79(1)° and 2Vcalc. = 79.8°. The unit-cell parameters are a = 9.9372(10), b = 18.010(2), c = 5.2808(5) Å, β = 104.955(2)°, V = 913.1(2) Å3, Z = 2 and space group C2/m. The strongest eight reflections in the powder X-ray pattern [d values (in Å) (I) (hkl)] are: 2.703 (100) (151); 3.380 (87) (131); 2.541 (80) ($\bar 2$02); 3.151 (70) (310); 3.284 (68) (240); 8.472 (59) (110); 2.587 (52) (061); 2.945 (50) (221,$\bar 1$51).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document