Outcome of transplantation of highly purified peripheral blood CD34+ cells with T-cell add-back compared with unmanipulated bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical sibling donors in patients with first chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 446-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet H. Elmaagacli ◽  
Rudolf Peceny ◽  
Nina Steckel ◽  
Rudolf Trenschel ◽  
Hellmut Ottinger ◽  
...  

Outcomes of highly purified CD34+ peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) (n = 32) were compared with those of PBSCT (n = 19) and of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) (n = 22) in the HLA-compatible sibling donor setting. Median follow-up was 18 months after CD34+-PBSCT and unmanipulated PBSCT and 20 months after BMT. CD34+-PBSCT was associated with delayed T-cell immune reconstitution at 3 months and 12 months after transplantation compared with PBSCT (P < .001) or BMT (not significant [NS]). The estimated probability of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 60% ± 13% for the PBSCT group, 37% ± 13% for the BMT group, and only 14% ± 8% for the CD34+-PBSCT group (CD34-PBSCT versus BMT,P < .01; and CD34-PBSCT versus PBSCT,P < .001). The probabilities for molecular relapse were 88% for CD34+-PBSCT, 55% after BMT, and 37% after PBSCT (CD34+-PBSCT versus PBSCT,P < .03). Cytogenetic relapse probability was 58% after CD34+-PBSCT, 42% after BMT, and 28% after PBSCT (NS). After CD34+-PBSCT, 26 of 32 patients received a T-cell add-back. Hematologic relapse occurred in 4 of 22 patients after BMT, in 3 of 19 patients after PBSCT, and in only 1 of 32 patients after CD34+-PBSCT. The occurrence of a hematologic relapse in patients receiving CD34+-PBSC transplants was prevented by donor leukocyte infusions, which were applied at a median of 4 times (range, 1-7 times) with a median T-cell dose of 3.3 × 106 × kg/body weight [at a median] beginning at day 120 (range, 60-690 days). The estimated probability of 3-year survival after transplantation was 90% in the CD34+-PBSCT group, 68% in the PBSCT group, and 63% in the BMT group (CD34-PBSCT versus BMT, P < .01; and CD34-PBSCT versus PBSCT, P < .03). Transplantation of CD34+-PBSCs with T-cell add-back for patients with CML in first chronic phase seems to be safe and is an encouraging alternative transplant procedure to BMT or PBSCT.

Blood ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 98 (10) ◽  
pp. 2917-2921 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Croop ◽  
Ryan Cooper ◽  
Christine Fernandez ◽  
Vicki Graves ◽  
Susan Kreissman ◽  
...  

Abstract A potential therapeutic option for patients with Fanconi anemia is collection of peripheral blood stem cells prior to the development of severe pancytopenia. These hematopoietic cells potentially could be infused when symptomatic bone marrow failure develops, as autologous rescue after chemotherapy in the event of leukemic transformation, or as targets for gene therapy. Eight patients with Fanconi anemia were mobilized with 10 μg/kg per day of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (median, 10 ± 4 days) to determine the feasibility of collecting peripheral blood stem cells for future use. Six patients achieved a peripheral blood CD34+ count of ≥ 6/μL and underwent apheresis. The collection goal was 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg based on a predicted weight 5 years from the date of collection. A mean of 2.6 ± 0.9 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg of the weight at the time of collection were collected, which corresponded to 1.9 ± 0.4 × 106 CD34+cells/kg of the target weight. The collections required a mean of 4 ± 3 days (range, 2-8 days) of apheresis. Six of the 8 subjects had ≥ 1 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg cryopreserved based on both actual and target weights, and 4 subjects had ≥ 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg cryopreserved based on the target weight. These results suggest that some patients with Fanconi anemia can have adequate numbers of CD34+ cells mobilized and collected from the peripheral blood prior to the onset of severe bone marrow failure, but they may require an extended mobilization and multiple days of collection.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3017-3017
Author(s):  
Ahmet Elmaagacli ◽  
Rudolf Peceny ◽  
Michael Koldehoff ◽  
Hellmut Ottinger ◽  
Rudolf Trenschel ◽  
...  

Abstract Since September 1998, we prospectively studied the feasibility of transplantation using purified peripheral blood CD34+ cells from HLA-identical sibling donors in first chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). A total of 60 patients (pts) with a median pretransplant risk score of 2 (range 1–4) has been included in this study. One patient received an unmanipulated graft due to poor CD34+ donor cell mobilization, while three pts (5%) were successfully retransplanted with an unmanipulated graft from the primary donor after secondary graft failure (n=2) or from an unrelated donor after hematologic relapse (n=1). As part of the study protocol, all pts were closely monitored for BCR-ABL transcripts using real-time RT-PCR analysis of peripheral blood cells as well as BCR-ABL-interphase FISH and metaphase karyotyping of marrow cells. Of the 60 pts, 56 were eligible for the application of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI), but 7 pts did not receive DLI due to sustained molecular remission and complete chimerism. Thirty-one pts (52%) received DLI because of increasing BCR-ABL transcript levels or hematologic relapse, and 18 pts (30%) as programmed T-cell add-back. The median starting dose was 0.33 (0.01 – 10) x 106 CD3+ cells per kg with a median maximum dose 3.3 (0.17 – 100) x 106 CD3+ cells per kg. DLI induced a lasting reduction of median BCR-ABL transcript levels (BCR-ABL/GAPDH ratio) of more than 3 log10 and the estimate of being in a complete molecular remission at 7 years is 83% ± 5%. Six pts. (10%) did not respond to DLI, but 4 of these pts. attained a cytogenetic and molecular response by imatinib and/or interferon treatment. The cumulative risk of grades II-IV acute GvHD is 15% ± 5% for all study pts, and the risk of chronic GvHD is 25% ± 6%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 46 (range 6 – 86) months for all pts, the cumulative 7-year survival estimate is 91% ± 4% (survival rate 92%). Causes of death were disease progression, secondary malignancy, liver failure, septicemia, and systemic capillary leak syndrome in one patient each. In conclusion, the concept of highly purified peripheral blood CD34+ cell transplantation in conjunction with adoptive DLI is associated with a particularly low risk of non-relapse mortality and allows induction of lasting molecular disease control in the majority of first chronic phase CML patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiorina Giona ◽  
Michelina Santopietro ◽  
Giuseppe Menna ◽  
Maria Caterina Putti ◽  
Concetta Micalizzi ◽  
...  

Background: To date, no data on the adherence to specific guidelines for children with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) have been reported. Methods: Since 2001, guidelines for treatment with imatinib mesylate (IM) and monitoring in patients younger than 18 years with CP-CML have been shared with 9 pediatric referral centers (P centers) and 4 reference centers for adults and children/adolescents (AP centers) in Italy. In this study, the adherence to these guidelines was analyzed. Results: Thirty-four patients with a median age of 11.4 years and 23 patients with a median age of 11.0 years were managed at 9 P and at 4 AP centers, respectively. Evaluations of bone marrow (BM) and/or peripheral blood (PB) were available for more than 90% of evaluable patients. Cytogenetics and molecular monitoring of PB were more consistently performed in AP centers, whereas molecular analysis of BM was carried out more frequently in P centers. Before 2009, some patients who responded to IM underwent a transplantation, contrary to the guidelines’ recommendations. Conclusions: Our experience shows that having specific guidelines is an important tool for an optimal management of childhood CP-CML, together with exchange of knowledge and proactive discussions within the network.


Stem Cells ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (S3) ◽  
pp. 43-47
Author(s):  
Ph. R. H&eacute;non ◽  
J. C. Eisenmann ◽  
M. Becker ◽  
G. Beck&hyphen;Wirth ◽  
E. Wunder ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2592-2592
Author(s):  
Giovanna Rege-Cambrin ◽  
Carmen Fava ◽  
Enrico Gottardi ◽  
Filomena Daraio ◽  
Emilia Giugliano ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Consensus has been achieved that standardized molecular quantitative analysis (RQ-PCR) on peripheral blood (PB) is a suitable method for monitoring residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, BM is still obtained at specific timepoints, and in a number of cases, only bone marrow (BM) sample collected for cytogenetic analysis is available. Being one of the laboratory involved in the standardization process of molecular monitoring for CML patients, we decided to perform a comparative analysis of BM and PB samples in order to evaluate the consistency of the results. Methods Between March 2009 and January 2013, 230 consecutive RQ-PCR tests to assess BCR-ABL transcript levels from simultaneously collected PB and BM samples were performed (for a total of 460 analysis) on 77 patients affected by Ph+ CML in chronic phase treated in our center. All samples were analyzed in the same laboratory following international guidelines (Cross N, Leukemia 2012) and results were expressed according to the International Scale; ABL1 was used as control gene. Time from blood-drawn to processing was within 3-4 hours. Results Among the 230 pairs, 3 were considered as not evaluable because of inadequate material; for the purpose of this study, the remaining 227 pairs were considered as “evaluable”. 204 pairs were classified as “fit” when both BM and PB ABL amplification resulted in more than 10.000 copies; 23 pairs were considered unfit for ABL1 <10.000 in either one of the two samples (21) or both (2). The mean number of ABL1 copies in all evaluable samples was 35.639 for BM (SD 21.465) and 30.958 for PB samples (SD 18.696). Correlation analysis was performed on the whole population and in 4 subgroups: No Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR, 22%), CCyR without Major Molecular Response (MMR), (21.6%), CCyR with MMR (excluding patients with MR4 or better,19.8%), and CCyR with MR4 – MR4.5 (32,6%). Cytogenetic response was not available in 9 BM samples (4%), not included in the subgroup analysis. Spearman correlation of BCR/ABL ratio values between PB versus BM paired samples resulted in a statistically significant correlation in all groups, both for evaluable and fit pairs. Correlation was stronger in samples that were not in MMR or better (table 1 and figure 1). The Wilcoxon test showed that the mean difference of BCR/ABL values between paired PB and BM samples was not significantly different from zero (in evaluable and fit pairs by considering the whole population). Concordance was further analyzed by the K test which resulted in a coefficient equal to 0.627, corresponding to a notable degree of concordance. For patients in CCyR, agreement on classification of response (MMR, MR4, MR4.5) between paired PB and BM samples was observed in 125/168 evaluable pairs; 22 out of the 43 evaluable cases of disagreement were due to technical failures (in 10 BM and 12 PB samples). In 14 of the remaining 21 cases, PB was more sensitive. Conclusions In a single center experience of molecular analysis, BCR/ABL ratio was highly consistent in BM and PB samples. In less than 10% of the cases a single test did not reach the required sensitivity of 10.000 ABL copies and the double testing allowed to obtain a valid result. This may be especially valuable in evaluating an early response (i.e. at 3 months), when the amount of disease has prognostic relevance. The analysis will be expanded to include samples coming from different centers to evaluate a possible role of timing and transport on data consistency. Disclosures: Saglio: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 384-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet H. Elmaagacli ◽  
Dietrich W. Beelen ◽  
Bertram Opalka ◽  
Siegfried Seeber ◽  
Ulrich W. Schaefer

Abstract The detection of residual molecular and cytogenetic disease was prospectively compared in patients with Philadelphia-chromosome (Ph1) positive first chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) who underwent allogeneic transplantation of unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCT) (n = 29) or bone marrow (BM) (n = 62) using genotypically HLA-identical sibling donors or partially HLA-matched extended family donors. A molecular relapse (MR), as defined by two consecutive positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for the detection of M-bcr-abl transcripts in a 4-week interval, was found in two of 29 (7%) patients after PBSCT compared with 20 of 62 (32%) patients after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). This corresponds to a 4-year molecular relapse estimate (± standard error) of 7% ± 5% after PBSCT and of 44% ± 8% after BMT (P &lt; .009). With identical follow-up periods of survivors in both patient subsets between 6 and 55 months (median, 28 months), 14 of the 20 patients with MR after BMT progressed to an isolated cytogenetic (n = 10) or a hematologic (n = 4) disease recurrence, resulting in a 4-year cytogenetic relapse estimate of 47% ± 11%, while none of the patients after PBSCT has so far relapsed (P &lt; .006). Multivariate analysis including all potential influencial factors of posttransplant disease recurrence identified the source of stem cells (P &lt; .02) as the only independent predictor of molecular relapse. In conclusion, this prospective comparison of molecular and cytogenetic residual disease demonstrates that peripheral blood stem cell transplants have a more pronounced activity against residual CML cells than bone marrow transplants. Prospective randomized trials comparing PBSCT and BMT in patients with first chronic phase Ph1-positive CML are strictly required to further substantiate differences in the antileukemic activity of the two stem cell sources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document