Early Prophylaxis Provides Continued Joint Protection in Severe Hemophilia A: Results of the Joint Outcome Continuation Study

Abstract Background: The Joint Outcome Study (JOS) was a randomized controlled trial showing that, in severe hemophilia A, prophylactic factor VIII every other day starting prior to age 30 months leads to better joint outcomes at age 6 years than enhanced episodic treatment with factor VIII for bleeding1. After conclusion of the JOS, all participants were encouraged to continue on, or to transition to, prophylaxis. Here we describe the results of the Joint Outcome Continuation Study (JOS-C), which followed the participants of the JOS to age 18 years. Methods: All participants of the JOS were eligible for the JOS-C. MRIs of 6 index joints (right and left ankles, knees, and elbows), index joint physical exam scores using the Colorado Haemophilia Paediatric Joint Physical Examination Scale2 , estimates of joint bleeding episodes, and surgery information were collected. The primary endpoint, as in the initial JOS analysis, was evidence of hemophilia-related osteochondral joint damage on MRI, scored using the extended MRI scale3. Results: Of the 65 previous participants of the JOS, 37 gave informed consent for the JOS-C study, including 18 initially randomized to prophylaxis prior to age 30 months ("early prophylaxis"), and 19 initially randomized to enhanced episodic treatment who started prophylaxis at a mean age of 7.5 years (median 6.1, range 2.7-17.1, "delayed prophylaxis"). All initially on prophylaxis in the JOS continued on prophylaxis through the JOS-C. One participant (early prophylaxis arm) failed to complete an MRI, and four others (2 early and 2 delayed prophylaxis) had their MRIs excluded for technical reasons. Four participants (3 early prophylaxis and 1 delayed prophylaxis) developed high titer inhibitors during or shortly after the JOS and were analyzed separately. Osteochondral joint damage was defined as evidence of osteochondral damage on MRI or a need for joint surgery. The relative risk of osteochondral damage in those on delayed prophylaxis as compared to those on early prophylaxis was 6.5 (95% CI 1.3, 33.6; p=0.029). At age 18, 67% of those on early prophylaxis, and only 24% of those on delayed prophylaxis had zero index joints with osteochondral damage (Figure 1). Twenty-five percent of early prophylaxis and 47% of delayed prophylaxis participants had osteochondral damage to more than one joint. Most participants had some soft tissue changes on MRI, defined as effusion, synovial hypertrophy, or hemosiderin deposition. There was no difference in risk of soft tissue damage between initial treatment groups (p=0.48). Osteochondral damage scores were available for 3 patients with inhibitors: two with refractory inhibitors had osteochondral changes on at least one joint, and one with an inhibitor that tolerized within 3 months had no osteochondral damage. Total physical exam scores were also higher in the delayed prophylaxis arm (mean 22.6, standard deviation (SD) 15.5) than in the early prophylaxis arm (mean 16.2, SD 10.5), but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.19). Conclusion: The JOS-C demonstrates that, in severe hemophilia A, initiation of prophylaxis prior to age 30 months provides continued protection against joint damage throughout childhood. Those who started on prophylaxis later in childhood had higher risk of joint damage at age 18. Initiation of factor VIII prophylaxis in the toddler years is critical to preventing osteochondral joint damage and should not be delayed. ReferencesManco-Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD, et al. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(6):535-544.Hacker MR, Funk SM, Manco-Johnson MJ. The Colorado Haemophilia Paediatric Joint Physical Examination Scale: normal values and interrater reliability. Haemophilia. 2007;13(1):71-78.Hong W, Raunig D, Lundin B. SPINART study: validation of the extended magnetic resonance imaging scale for evaluation of joint status in adult patients with severe haemophilia A using baseline data. Haemophilia. 2016;22(6):e519-e526. Figure 1: Percentage of participants with zero joints with osteochondral damage at JOS exit (age 6 years) and JOS-C exit (age 18 years), excluding participants with inhibitors. Disclosures Warren: Bayer Healthcare: Research Funding; HTRS/Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Bayer Hemophilia Awards Program Fellowship Project Award: Research Funding; CSL Behring Heimburger Award: Research Funding. Shapiro:Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Prometic Life Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Kedrion Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bio Products Laboratory: Consultancy; Bioverativ, a Sanofi Company: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare: Other: International Network of Pediatric Hemophilia; Sangamo Biosciences: Consultancy; Octapharma: Research Funding; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; OPKO: Research Funding; BioMarin: Research Funding. Recht:Shire: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Manco-Johnson:Bayer AG: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Biogentek: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Baxalta, now part of Shire: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Treatment Of Serious Bleeds With a B-Domain Deleted Recombinant Porcine Sequence Factor VIII (OBI-1) In Patients With Acquired Hemophilia A: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.206.206 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 206-206 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Rebecca Kruse-Jarres ◽

Jean St. Louis ◽

Anne Greist ◽

Amy D. Shapiro ◽

Hedy Smith ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Factor Viii ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Positive Response ◽

Acquired Hemophilia A ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Baxter Healthcare ◽

Bayer Healthcare ◽

Travel Grant

Abstract Introduction Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder, resulting from auto-antibodies to human factor VIII (hFVIII). The challenges created by the management of AHA and the co-morbidities present in this typically elderly population, can be managed by a recombinant, highly pure, B-domain deleted, porcine sequence FVIII (OBI-1) that is not generally susceptible to the inhibitory activity of anti-human FVIII antibodies. Treatment with OBI-1 allows for monitoring of FVIII levels which provides a reproducible and objective surrogate predictor of hemostasis. Eradication of hFVIII inhibitors with immunosuppressive therapy is critical for disease management. During immunosuppression, the patient transitions from a bleeding state at initial presentation to a relative hypercoagulable state which can be an issue in patients who are susceptible to thromboembolic events due to their comorbidities. This transition period is of most concern especially when using traditionally utilized bypassing agents that cannot be monitored. OBI-1 enables measurement of FVIII levels, guiding dosing and enhancing treatment safety during this critical period. Methods This global, prospective, multi-center phase 2/3 open label clinical trial investigates the efficacy and safety of OBI-1 in the treatment of serious bleeds in adults with AHA conducted under ICH guidelines and local IRB/Ethics Committee oversight. Primary efficacy endpoint was assessed at 24 hours (eg. effective, partially effective). All subjects (N= 18) presented with a serious bleed and were treated with an initial dose of OBI-1 (200 U/kg), followed by additional doses based on the subject's target factor VIII levels, anti-OBI-1 titer, and clinical factors. Results In all 18 subjects, a positive response (14 effective/4 partially effective) to treatment was observed at 24 hours. This positive response to OBI-1 treatment was seen by 8 hours in 14/18 of the subjects and at 16 hours in 16/18 of the subjects. Median total exposure to OBI-1 per subject was 1782.5 U/kg. The median total first dose was 14,000 U. For subjects who received additional doses of OBI-1, the median dose was reduced from the initial dose, but did not differ considerably over subsequent doses (9180 to 13561 U; median 11000 U). The majority of subjects (17/18) received concomitant immunosuppressive therapies. No related serious adverse reactions occurred. Non-serious adverse events related to treatment were noted in 5/18 (27.8%) subjects. One subject had mild tachycardia, hypotension and constipation. One subject had 2 instances of mild PICC line occlusion. One subject had a mild hypofibrogenemia. All of these adverse effects completely resolved. Three subjects developed anti-porcine inhibitors after infusion of study drug (range 8-108 BU) and two were discontinued from treatment. Anti-porcine inhibitors were detected prior to infusion in 6/18 patients (range 0.8-29 BU). All of these subjects had a favorable clinical response at 24 hours post-OB-1 infusions. Conclusions Data from this prospective study demonstrate OBI-1 as a safe and effective treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with AHA, with the added advantage over other bypass therapies of allowing FVIII monitoring throughout treatment and healing phase. Disclosures: Kruse-Jarres: Baxter Healthcare: Consultancy; Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy; Biogen IDEC: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy; Kedrion: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy. St. Louis:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Baxter: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria. Shapiro:Kedrion Biopharma: Consultancy; Chugai Pharma USA: Consultancy; Biogen IDEC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer HealthCare: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter Healthcare: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chowdary:Baxter Healthcare: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel grant Other; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel grant, Travel grant Other; Bayer HealthCare: Honoraria, Travel grant, Travel grant Other; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel grant, Travel grant Other; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel grant Other; Biogen IDEC: Honoraria, Travel, Travel Other. Drebes:Octapharma: Travel grant Other; CSL Behring: Travel grant, Travel grant Other; Leo-pharma: Travel grant, Travel grant Other; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gomperts:Baxter Healthcare: Consultancy; Asklepios Biopharmaceutoicals Inc: Consultancy; Cangene Inc: Consultancy. Chapman:Baxter Healthcare: Employment. Mo:Baxter Healthcare: Employment. Novack:Baxter Healthcare: Employment. Farin:Baxter Healthcare: Employment.

Download Full-text

Target Joint Bleeding in Pediatric Patients with Hemophilia Α Receiving Twice Weekly Prophylaxis with a Pegylated Full-Length Recombinant Factor VIII with Extended Half-Life

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3778.3778 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3778-3778

Author(s):

Amy L. Dunn ◽

Alexis A. Thompson ◽

Werner Engl ◽

Marlies Sharkhawy ◽

Brigitt E. Abbuehl

Keyword(s):

Factor Viii ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Half Life ◽

Research Funding ◽

Pediatric Patients ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Point Estimate ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Mean

Abstract Introduction: Patients with hemophilia A are at risk for acute bleeding which may affect muscles and other soft tissues but characteristically involves joints. Prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) is the optimal treatment to prevent bleeding into joints and, when begun at a young age, may prevent arthropathy. BAX 8551, a polyethylene glycol (peg)ylated, full-length, recombinant FVIII built on ADVATE2, demonstrated extended half-life, efficacy, and safety for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: A phase 3, prospective, uncontrolled, multicenter study was performed in pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A without history of inhibitors. To be eligible, patients aged <6 years had to have ≥50, those aged 6 to <12 years ≥150 previous exposure days (EDs) to FVIII. Patients received twice weekly infusions of 50 ±10 IU/kg of BAX 855 over a period of 6 months or ≥50 EDs. The prevalence of target joints, defined as a single joint with ≥3 spontaneous bleeding episodes in any consecutive 6-month period, was assessed at baseline. Annualized rates of target joint bleeds and the course of target joints were evaluated by age (<6 and 6 to <12 years). The study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association. Results:Sixty-six patients were treated with a mean (SD) BAX 855 dose of 51.1 (5.5) IU/kg at a mean (SD) frequency of 1.8 (0.2) infusions/week. Fourteen of 66 patients (21.2%), 3/32 (9.4%) in the younger and 11/34 (32.4%) in the older cohort, had a total of 23 target joints at screening. The number of target joint bleeds decreased during a mean (SD) of 48.5 (7.7; median: 49.0) prophylactic EDs/patient. Five of 66 (7.6%) patients had at least 1 target joint bleed, 1/32 (3.1%) in the younger and 4/34 (11.8%) in the older cohort. The point estimate for the mean (95% CI) annualized rate of target joint bleeds was 0 (0 - infinity; median: 0) compared to an annualized rate of all joint bleeds of 1.1 (0.6 - 1.9; median: 0) and an annualized rate of all bleeds of 3.0 (2.2 - 4.2; median: 2.0) (Table 1). The point estimate for the mean (95% CI) annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in 52 patients without target joints was 2.9 (2.0 - 4.2; median: 2.0) and was similar in 14 patients with target joints at screening at 3.5 (1.9 - 6.6; median: 2.1). In the younger cohort, the ABR was lower in patients with than those without target joints. However, the number of patients <6 years with target joints (N = 3) was too small to draw any conclusions (Table 1). During BAX 855 prophylaxis, no new target joints developed in any patient. Ten of 14 patients had at least 1 target joint revert to a non-target joint. In 8 of these 10 patients, 4 with 1 and 4 with 2 target joints, all target joints resolved. Conclusions:These results suggest that twice weekly infusion of BAX 855 is effective in the prevention of bleeding into target joints and may revert target to non-target joints in pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A. 1BAX 855 (Baxalta US Inc., now part of Shire) is licensed in the US and Japan under the trade name ADYNOVATE. 2ADVATE is a trade mark of Baxalta US Inc., now part of Shire. Disclosures Dunn: NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kedrion: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxalta (now part of Shire): Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding. Thompson:Eli Lily: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; ApoPharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mast: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Baxalta (now part of Shire): Research Funding. Engl:Shire: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sharkhawy:Baxalta (now part of Shire): Employment. Abbuehl:Baxalta (now part of Shire): Employment.

Download Full-text

Breakthrough Bleeding in Hemophilia a Patients on Prophylaxis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2581.2581 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2581-2581 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Beth Boulden Warren ◽

Taylor Blades ◽

Natalie L Smith ◽

Michael Wang ◽

Marilyn J. Manco-Johnson

Keyword(s):

Factor Viii ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Tolerance Induction ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Breakthrough Bleeding ◽

University Of Colorado ◽

The University

Abstract Background: Patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII (FVIII)<1%), as well as many patients with moderate hemophilia A (FVIII 1-5%), are treated intravenously with FVIII prophylaxis to prevent bleeding. However, breakthrough bleeding occurs in many patients. Methods: To better understand breakthrough bleeding, we evaluated the effect of hemophilia severity, prophylaxis adherence, and replacement FVIII utilization on bleeding rates in patients with hemophilia A on prophylaxis. Data on hemophilia severity and bleeding rates were collected from subjects with hemophilia A, ages 2-30 years, treated at the University of Colorado for hemophilia A, using the University of Colorado Clinical Research Bleeding Disorders Database (UCBDD). Adherence and FVIII utilization data were collected from a subset of subjects with hemophilia A on prophylaxis without active inhibitors who participated in the Centers for Disease Control/American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Community Counts (CDCCC) registry between December 2013 and June 2016, which surveyed participants about their estimated percentage of missed prophylaxis doses. The CDCCC registry was also used to corroborate bleeding rates. The effect of hemophilia severity and missed prophylaxis doses (percentage of prescribed doses) on bleeding rates were analyzed using logistic regression, with bleeding rates dichotomized as high or low relative to study population median bleeding rates. The relationship between weekly factor utilization and annualized bleeding rates was evaluated using Pearson's correlation. Results: Of 89 patients with severe hemophilia A in the UCBDD, 86.5% of patients were on continuous prophylaxis, with an additional 7.9% on immune tolerance induction. The 5.6% of patients with severe hemophilia on episodic treatment had been encouraged to use prophylaxis but had declined. Of 37 patients with moderate hemophilia A, 48.7% were on continuous prophylaxis. Sixty-nine subjects on prophylaxis had data in the UCBDD and the CDCCC registry collected during the defined time period. Bleeding rates are shown in Table 1. Prophylaxis doses in this population had an interquartile range of 74.3 to 120 units/kg/week (mean 96.9 units/kg/week), dosed 2-7 times per week depending on activities and historic bleeding patterns. Eighty-two percent of patients rated their percentage of missed prophylaxis doses at <10%, 11.6% rated their missed doses at 10-20%, 2.9% rated their missed doses at 21-50%, and 2.9% rated missed doses at >50%. There was not a statistically significant relationship between any bleeding rate and percentage of missed doses, hemophilia severity, or factor utilization, as shown graphically in figures 1 and 2. Conclusion: Although prophylaxis usage and adherence were excellent, breakthrough bleeding was common, with breakthrough joint bleeding occurring in 36% of subjects, and was not related to FVIII dose per week. Prospective studies are needed to better determine individually tailored prophylaxis regimen using dose, product class, and timing with activities, in order to achieve more effective prophylaxis. Table 1 Bleeding Rates on Continuous Prophylaxis. No intracranial or gastrointestinal hemorrhages were recorded in this population. Table 1. Bleeding Rates on Continuous Prophylaxis. No intracranial or gastrointestinal hemorrhages were recorded in this population. Figure 1 Relationship between Bleeding Rates, Hemophilia Severity and Adherence Figure 1. Relationship between Bleeding Rates, Hemophilia Severity and Adherence Figure 2 No correlation was found between bleeding rates and factor VIII utilization as measured in units per kg per week. Figure 2. No correlation was found between bleeding rates and factor VIII utilization as measured in units per kg per week. Disclosures Warren: HTRS/Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Bayer Hemophilia Awards Program: Research Funding. Wang:Biogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; HEMA Biologics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LFB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Manco-Johnson:Baxalta: Honoraria; NovoNordisk: Honoraria; BiogenIdec: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

The Bleeding Tendency In Relation To Predicted FVIII Activity Levels In Severe Hemophilia A Patients Treated With Recombinant Factor VIII Fc Fusion Protein

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3590.3590 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3590-3590 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

John Pasi ◽

James Potts ◽

Shuanglian Li ◽

Ping Wang ◽

Sarah Kulke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Negative Binomial ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Bleeding Tendency ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Episodic Treatment ◽

Fviii Activity ◽

Bleeding Episodes

Abstract Introduction Prophylactic regimens with coagulation factor in patients with hemophilia A have been designed to maintain FVIII activity above 1 IU/dL, based on previous studies demonstrating that joints can be preserved and bleeding is minimized when circulating factor levels remain above this level (Nilsson IM, et al. J Intern Med 1992). Collins and colleagues confirmed this observation and demonstrated that increasing time spent under 1 IU/dL FVIII activity in patients on prophylaxis with recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) was associated with an increase in bleeding episodes and hemarthroses (Collins PW, et al. J Thromb Haemost 2009). The pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of rFVIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) have been evaluated in the A-LONG study and recently reported (Mahlangu J, et al. J Thromb Haemost 2013). Briefly, previously treated male patients, ≥12 years old with severe hemophilia A, were enrolled in A-LONG and allocated to 1 of 3 treatment arms: Arm 1) individualized prophylaxis with dose and dosing interval adjustments (25–65 IU/kg every 3–5 days) based on PK and clinical indications, Arm 2, fixed dose (65 IU/kg) weekly prophylaxis, and Arm 3, episodic treatment (10–50 IU/kg) for bleeding episodes. The median annualized bleeding rates for individualized prophylaxis and weekly prophylaxis were 1.6 and 3.6, respectively, and 33.6 for episodic treatment. In this analysis, we evaluated the bleeding tendency in relation to predicted FVIII activity levels in 163 subjects in the A-LONG study. Methods A 2-compartment population PK model of rFVIIIFc was developed based on activity-time profiles in 180 severe hemophilia A subjects aged 12 – 65 years old (16 from a Phase 1/2a study and 164 from A-LONG collected over ≤ 52 weeks of treatment) (Neelakantan S, et al. J Thromb Haemost 2013). Individual post-hoc PK parameters were derived to construct continuous FVIII activity-time profiles for each dose administered over the course of the study for 163 subjects in A-LONG. The cumulative time under 1IU/dL FVIII levels for each individual on study was calculated and normalized to obtain annualized time under 1IU/dL. Negative binomial regression models were used to evaluate associations between the number of bleeding episodes (overall, spontaneous, traumatic, and joint) and annualized time (days) under 1IU/dL FVIII activity. Models were adjusted for age, body mass index, baseline HIV and HCV status, baseline von Willebrand factor, number of bleeding episodes in the 12 months prior to study entry, and each subject’s time on study. Results The predicted median annualized time under 1IU/dL FVIII activity for subjects on episodic treatment was 224.81 days, which was shortened to 51.55 days in subjects on a fixed prophylactic dose of 65 IU/kg of rFVIIIFc once weekly, and further reduced to 2.17 days in subjects on tailored prophylactic regimens (25 – 65 IU/kg, every 3 – 5 days). Multivariable negative binomial regression analysis showed that the number of overall bleeding episodes increased with increased time spent under 1IU/dL of FVIII activity level (p<0.001). A significant association was also observed for the time under 1IU/dL and the individual bleed types (spontaneous, traumatic, and joint) when analyzed separately. In addition, across all subtypes of bleeding, there was a significant decrease in the odds of being bleed-free for each one day increase in the time spent under 1IU/dL of FVIII activity. Conclusions In subjects treated with rFVIIIFc in the A-LONG study, there was a significant association between increased time spent under 1IU/dL of FVIII activity and increased bleeding tendency, as well as decreased odds of being bleed-free. The findings reinforce the importance of a therapeutic threshold of 1 IU/dL of FVIII activity as reported previously, and contribute to building a stronger foundation for designing effective rFVIIIFc prophylactic dosing regimens based on population PK simulations of FVIII activity. Disclosures: Pasi: Bayer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bio Products Laboratory Ltd: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; OctaPharma : Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding. Potts:Biogen Idec: Employment. Li:Biogen Idec: Employment. Wang:Biogen Idec: Employment. Kulke:Biogen Idec: Employment. Pierce:Biogen Idec: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jiang:Biogen Idec: Employment; Biogen Idec: Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Lack of Inhibitor Development in the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN)-2 Factor Switching Study: Preliminary Report of Primary Outcome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-128612 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1114-1114

Author(s):

Robert F. Sidonio ◽

Dunlei Cheng ◽

Christine Guelcher ◽

Janna M. Journeycake ◽

Susan U Lattimore ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Factor Viii ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Half Life ◽

Research Funding ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Inhibitor Development

Introduction: With many standard half-life (SHL) and extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII and factor IX products licensed in the US over the last 6 years, it is likely that previously treated patients (PTPs) will consider switching to a new EHL FVIII or FIX product. Although past product switching surveillance suggests no increased inhibitor development risk, there is the need for a real-world data on the incidence of inhibitor development following switching from SHL to EHL rFVIII or rFIX in PTPs with hemophilia A and B. Methods: A longitudinal, observational study of participants with Hemophilia A or B who switched to a rFVIII or rFIX concentrate licensed after Jan 1, 2013. The study included retrospective (switched within 50 exposure days (EDs) and prospective arms. Participants were recruited from ATHN-affiliated Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs). The primary outcome measure was the development of a new inhibitor (i.e. neutralizing antibodies to factor VIII or IX) a 1 year or during the 50 EDs following the product switch. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, 10 EDs and 50 EDs. Inclusion criteria include moderate or severe hemophilia A/B currently on a plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII or FIX concentrate with planned or recent switch to an EHL FVIII or FIX concentrate approved after Jan 1, 2013. Participants with an active inhibitor at time of enrollment or undergoing ITI or switched to a non-factor product were excluded. Results: 303 hemophilia participants from 27 treatment centers were enrolled from 2015 to June 2019. The median age at enrollment was 17 years (IQR 10-32 years). 300 of 303 participants were male, Caucasian (72.6%) and had private insurance (44.9%). 74.3% were FVIII deficient and 25.7% were FIX deficient. Most had severe hemophilia A or B, 82.3% (n=237) and 12.8% (n=37) had a prior history of inhibitor but were negative at the time of enrollment. Prior to the switching, 92.1% (n=197) and 7.9% (n=17) of hemophilia A participants took standard rFVIII or pdFVIII respectively, while 87.8% (n=65) and 12.2% (n=9) of hemophilia B participants took standard rFIX or pdFIX, respectively. The three most frequent switching reasons were extended half-life consideration (n=192; 66.7%), a desire for a longer acting version (n=55; 19.1%) and less than expected clinical response to the current product (n=15; 5.2%). Among 214 participants with hemophilia A, 182 (85.0%) switched to FVIII EHL products while 23 (10.7%) switched to new SHL FVIII. For nine patients (4.2%) switching product information was not available. 72 out of 74 (97.3%) participants with hemophilia B that switched products, switched to an EHL rFIX. Eleven hemophilia participants (six A and five B) entered a second cycle of switching after the completion of the first switching cycle. Following that, four switched to FVIII EHL products, two to new SHL rFVIII and five to rFIX EHL products. A total of 193 (63.7%; 148 FVIII, 45 FIX) participants completed the clinical trial while 36 (11.9%; 26 FVIII, 10 FIX) did not complete the trial and 74 (24.4%) are ongoing in the trial. None of 303 (0%) enrolled participants developed an inhibitor, the primary outcome for this study, through data updated 6/2019. Variability was noted in per-site enrollment. The median enrollment per Hemophilia Treatment Center (HTC) was 10, the IQR was 7-16 with a range of 1-31. The types of factors associated with patients switches are summarized in the figure. Conclusion: No new inhibitors were noted among 303 moderate/severe hemophilia A/B PTPs without active inhibitors at entry, who switched factor VIII or IX products over 50 exposure days or 12 months. This result provides real-world evidence of the rarity of inhibitor development after a product switch in PTPs. The study also achieved a key logistical objective: to demonstrate feasibility of a prospective observational study across ATHN sites. Figure Legend: Factor types to which ATHN-2 patients switched during the study. Disclosures Sidonio: Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Uniqure: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Research Funding; Takeda-Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Guelcher:Takeda: Other: Advisory Board; Genetech: Other: Advisory Board; NovoNordisk: Other: Advisory Board; Octapharma: Other: Advisory Board. Takemoto:genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; novartis: Other: DSMB membership. Tarantino:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Michael Tarantino, MD SC: Other: President, Owner- Private Practice ; Magellan Healthcare: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Clinical Trial PI, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bleeding and Clotting Disorders Institute: Employment; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grant Reviewer , Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Neufeld:Octapharma, Agios, Acceleron, Grifols, Pfizer, CSL Behring, Shire Pharmaceuticals (Baxalta), Novo Nordisk, ApoPharma, Genentech, Novartis, Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; Octapharma, Shire Pharmaceuticals (Baxalta), Novo Nordisk, Celgene, NHLBI/NIH: Research Funding; Octapharma: Other: study investigator, NuProtect study (Octapharma-sponsored).

Download Full-text

Long-Term Efficacy of rFVIIIFc Prophylaxis in Pediatric, Adolescent, and Adult Subjects with Target Joints and Severe Hemophilia A

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3520.3520 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3520-3520

Author(s):

Bryce A. Kerlin ◽

Roshni Kulkarni ◽

Beatrice Nolan ◽

Michael Wang ◽

K John Pasi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Treatment Group ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Episodic Treatment ◽

Bleeding Episodes

Abstract Background: The phase 3 A-LONG and Kids A-LONG studies demonstrated the safety and efficacy of recombinant FVIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) for control and prevention of bleeding episodes in subjects with severe hemophilia A. The ongoing rFVIIIFc extension study, ASPIRE (Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01454739), evaluates long-term safety and efficacy of rFVIIIFc in adults/adolescents and children who completed A-LONG and Kids A-LONG, respectively. Aims: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of rFVIIIFc in subjects with target joints at entry into the parent studies (A-LONG, Kids A-LONG). Methods: A-LONG and Kids A-LONG were Phase 3, open-label, multicenter studies in males aged ≥12 years (A-LONG) or <12 years (Kids A-LONG) with severe hemophilia A (<1 IU/dL endogenous FVIII activity) and prior FVIII treatment. Subjects in A-LONG were enrolled into 1 of 3 arms: Arm 1, individualized prophylaxis (IP); Arm 2, weekly prophylaxis (WP); or Arm 3, episodic treatment. All Kids A-LONG subjects received rFVIIIFc prophylaxis. Upon completing A-LONG or Kids A-LONG, eligible subjects could enroll in ASPIRE. There are 4 treatment groups in ASPIRE: IP; WP; modified prophylaxis (MP; for subjects in whom optimal dosing could not be achieved with individualized or weekly prophylaxis); or episodic treatment. Subjects can change treatment groups upon entry or at any point during ASPIRE. Subjects aged ≥12 years can participate in any treatment group; subjects aged <12 years can participate in the individualized and modified prophylaxis groups only. Self-reported prestudy 12-month bleeding history and on-study annualized bleeding rate (ABR), including overall ABR and ABR in target joints present at baseline were evaluated. The current analysis evaluated subjects with ≥1 target joint (major joint with ≥3 bleeding episodes in a 6-month period) at entry into the parent study with available prestudy and on-study data. Outcomes were analyzed over the cumulative duration of the parent study through the ASPIRE interim datacut (January 6, 2014). Subjects were evaluated in each treatment group they participated in, for the duration they were in that treatment group (because of the ability to switch groups, subjects may be included in >1 group). Results: The analyzed population included 111 adult/adolescent and 13 pediatric subjects with target joints at entry into A-LONG and Kids A-LONG, respectively. Median (range) cumulative duration of treatment with rFVIIIFc on A-LONG/ASPIRE was 110 (24-162), 79 (2-110), 80 (45-86), and 33 (16-116) weeks for the IP (n = 82), WP (n = 26), MP (n = 12), and episodic treatment (n = 18) groups, respectively; for Kids A-LONG/ASPIRE, median (range) duration was 51 (22-58) and 16 weeks for the IP (n = 13) and MP (n = 1) prophylaxis groups, respectively. Among 111 A-LONG subjects, there were 287 target joints at baseline (located in the elbow [n = 100; 34.8%], ankle [n = 92; 32.1%], knee [n = 63; 22.0%], shoulder [n = 17; 5.9%], wrist [n = 9; 3.1%], and hip [n = 6; 2.1%]). Among 13 Kids A-LONG subjects, there were 15 target joints at baseline (located in the ankle [n = 10; 66.7%], elbow [n = 4; 26.7%], and knee [n = 1; 6.7%]). In subjects with target joints at baseline, median on-study overall ABRs with rFVIIIFc prophylaxis for adults/adolescents (Fig. 1A) and children (Fig. 1B) tended to be lower than prestudy bleeding rates. On-study, both provoked and spontaneous target joint median ABRs were low. A total of 47.6%, 42.3%, and 41.7% of subjects in the IP, WP, and WP groups, respectively, had no target joint bleeding episodes during A-LONG/ASPIRE; for Kids A-LONG subjects, 53.8% of subjects in the IP group had no target joint bleeding episodes on-study. Median average total weekly rFVIIIFc prophylactic doses and median dosing intervals during A-LONG/ASPIRE and Kids A-LONG/ASPIRE for subjects with target joints at baseline were similar to those for the overall study populations. Summary/Conclusion: For subjects with target joints at baseline, efficacy data from the phase 3 and extension trials suggest that long-term use of extended half-life rFVIIIFc prophylaxis is effective for prevention of target joint bleeding. Disclosures Kerlin: Bayer Healthcare US and Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Research Funding. Kulkarni:Baxter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BPL: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Nolan:Biogen and Sobi: Research Funding. Wang:Biogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pasi:Octapharma: Research Funding; Biogen, Octapharma, Genzyme, and Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Liesner:Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Brown:Biogen, Novo Nordisk, Baxter, and Pfizer: Other: Sponsorship to meeting. Hanabusa:Novo Nordisk, Baxalta, Bayer, Pfizer, Biogen, and KaketsuKen: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk, Baxalta, KaketsuKen, and Biogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tsao:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Allen:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Severe Bleeding Events in Hemophilia Α Patients Receiving Emicizumab Prophylaxis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-126659 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1126-1126

Author(s):

Karen L. Zimowski ◽

Glaivy M. Batsuli ◽

Paulette Bryant ◽

Jenny McDaniel ◽

Kelly Tickle ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Severe Bleeding ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Acute Bleeding ◽

Fviii Activity ◽

Bleeding Episodes

Introduction : Emicizumab is a novel humanized bispecific antibody that mimics the function of activated coagulation factor VIII (fVIII). It has significantly changed the management of patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors by achieving baseline hemostatic control. Based on the HAVEN studies, emicizumab markedly reduces annualized bleeding rates and is FDA-approved for prophylaxis in hemophilia A patients of all ages, regardless of inhibitor status. In the HAVEN2 interim analysis, only 3/57 pediatric patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis required treatment for an acute bleeding event after a 9-week median observation time. We report 3 patients with severe hemophilia A and a history of inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis with severe or refractory bleeding episodes to highlight the importance of vigilance and surveillance of children with severe hemophilia A on emicizumab. Methods: This retrospective analysis includes patients between 0-21 years of age with severe hemophilia A (fVIII activity < 1%) receiving emicizumab prophylaxis and admitted for the management of an acute bleeding episode following emicizumab's FDA approval in November 2017. Patients were followed at the Pediatric Hemophilia Treatment Center at the Hemophilia of Georgia Center for Bleeding & Clotting Disorders of Emory and the St. Jude Affiliate Clinic at Novant Health Hemby Children's Hospital. Data collected included demographics, past medical history including inhibitor status, bleeding history, and treatment modalities, and details regarding the presentation, management, and outcome of acute severe bleeding events. Due to the nature of the study, descriptive statistics were primarily used for data analysis. Results: Three patients with severe hemophilia A receiving emicizumab prophylaxis were admitted for the management of 4 severe bleeding episodes. All patients had a history of a fVIII inhibitor. Three of the 4 bleeding episodes were trauma-induced while 1 occurred spontaneously. For the traumatic episodes, all patients presented with worsening symptoms approximately 1 week following the inciting event. All patients had a normal aPTT at the time of presentation, ruling out a significant anti-drug antibody (emicizumab level not available). A patient with a low-titer inhibitor developed an epidural hematoma following a trampoline injury and was treated with continuous infusion of recombinant factor VIII (rfVIII), adjusting the rate to achieve chromogenic fVIII activity of 100% for 14 days. Following 14 days, he was started on rfVIII 50 IU/kg Q12 hours with a goal fVIII activity of 50%. His rfVIII dosing interval was gradually weaned to every other day while in inpatient rehabilitation. As outlined in Table 1, the remaining 3 bleeding events were initially managed with recombinant activated factor VII (rfVIIa) dosed at 80-90 mcg/kg/dose with escalating frequency for an average of 8 days. However, due to lack of improvement, treatment was changed to low-dose activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC; 10-15 IU/kg/dose Q12-24 hours for an average of 7 days). In all 3 of these events, the hematomas improved after treatment with aPCC. No patient experienced thrombotic microangiopathy, thrombosis, or had evidence of DIC while receiving these treatment regimens. Discussion/Conclusion: Pharmacokinetic analysis of emicizumab suggests that following the standard 4-week loading phase, trough plasma emicizumab concentrations obtained prior to a 1.5 mg/kg once weekly maintenance dose correlates with at least 10-15 IU/dL equivalent fVIII activity. This degree of thrombin generation should be sufficient to prevent severe spontaneous bleeding episodes in most patients. However it does not preclude significant trauma-induced bleeding or spontaneous bleeding in inhibitor patients. Based on our cases, providers should maintain a high index of suspicion for acute bleeding in patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. Serious bleeding events, although rare, may have a more insidious onset in patients receiving emicizumab. Furthermore, despite the baseline hemostasis achieved with emicizumab, acute bleeding events may still require aggressive therapy. Our cases suggest that low-dose aPCC or continuous infusion fVIII may be feasible options for treating acute bleeding events in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. Disclosures Zimowski: Pfizer: Research Funding; National Hemophilia Foundation: Other: Medical Loan Reimbursement, Research Funding. Batsuli:Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bryant:Novo Nordisk: Other: PI on Novo Nordisk sponsored Studies. McDaniel:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tickle:National Hemophilia Foundation: Research Funding. Meeks:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda-Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; HEMA Biologics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sidonio:Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda-Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Uniqure: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase II Trial of Rituximab in the Treatment of Inhibitors in Congenital Hemophilia A: Results of the RICH Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.27.27 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 27-27 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Cindy A. Leissinger ◽

Rebecca Kruse-Jarres ◽

Suzanne Granger ◽

Barbara A Konkle ◽

Margaret V. Ragni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Null Hypothesis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

High Titer ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Minor Response ◽

Inhibitor Titer

Abstract Abstract 27 Antibodies (inhibitors) to exogenously administered factor VIII (FVIII) develop in as many as 30 – 40% of patients with severe hemophilia A. Patients with persistent inhibitors are at increased risk of serious, poorly controlled bleeding which results in significant morbidity and in some cases early death. Rituximab, a chimeric murine/human monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, suppresses circulating and tissue B cells and pre-B cells and has been used in the treatment of a variety of autoimmune and alloimmune disorders. The primary objective of this NHLBI Transfusion Medicine Hemostasis network-sponsored study was to evaluate the role of rituximab as an approach to inhibit the production of FVIII antibodies in patients with severe congenital hemophilia A and high titer inhibitors. Methods: This was a prospective, multi-institution, single-arm, open-label Phase II trial. Eligible subjects were males over 18 months of age with severe hemophilia A and a history of an inhibitor ≥5 Bethesda units (BU). Individuals who were HIV positive, undergoing immune tolerance, or receiving immune modulating therapies were excluded. Following a challenge dose of recombinant FVIII (rAHF-PFM) at 50 IU/kg, and evidence of an inhibitor titer ≥ 5 BU at 5 – 14 days after the challenge dose, subjects received rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks. Starting two weeks after the fourth rituximab treatment, inhibitor titers were drawn every 4 weeks. A major response was defined as a fall in the inhibitor titer to < 5 BU at any time up to and including week 22, with the titer remaining < 5 BU following re-challenge with FVIII. A minor response was defined as inhibitor falling to < 5 BU at any time up to and including week 22, with the anamnestic peak following re-challenge with FVIII between 5–10 BU and less than 50% of the original anamnestic peak. The null hypothesis was that no more than 5% of subjects treated with rituximab would be major responders. Results: A total of 23 subjects were enrolled; 21 received the initial FVIII challenge. Of these, 4 subjects did not meet the criteria to receive rituximab treatment, and 1 subject withdrew consent. A total of 16 subjects received at least one dose of rituximab and are included in this analysis. The median age was 14 y (range 4 – 38 y). Three subjects (18.8%) had a major response. If the null hypothesis were true, the probability of 3 or more major responses in 16 subjects would be 0.043, so the null hypothesis was rejected. One subject (6.2%) had a minor response to treatment. All 4 responders and 8 non-responders had a baseline inhibitor titer < 20 BU, resulting in a response rate of 33% in that group vs. 0% in the 4 subjects with a baseline inhibitor titer ≥ 20 BU. Discussion: Infusion of rituximab 375 mg/m2 once per week for four weeks was effective in reducing the anamnestic inhibitor response in 25% of severe hemophilia A subjects with inhibitors who were not receiving concurrent immune tolerance therapy. Those who responded tended to have lower baseline inhibitor levels compared to the group that did not meet the criteria for response. This Phase II study, designed as a proof of concept, demonstrated that rituximab may be useful in lowering inhibitor levels and anamnesis in some patients with inhibitors, but that the effect as a solo treatment strategy is modest, and possibly restricted to patients with inhibitor titers under 20 BU. Further studies are indicated to determine the role of rituximab as an adjunctive therapy in immune tolerization strategies. Acknowledgments: The authors acknowledge the support of Genentech for the provision of rituximab and partial financial support for the study. The authors also acknowledge Baxter Healthcare Corporation for donating the recombinant FVIII used in the trial. Disclosures: Leissinger: Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Rituximab, a drug approved for use in treating lymphoma, was studied for its efficacy in suppressing inhibitors against factor VIII in patients with hemophilia and high titer inhibitors. Kruse-Jarres:Baxter: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer:; Griforls: Consultancy, Honoraria; Inspiration: Consultancy, Honoraria; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria. Konkle:Baxter Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer Corp: Consultancy; Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Neufeld:Genentech: Research Funding; Baxter: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Bennett:Biogen IDEC: Honoraria. Valentino:Baxter Bioscience, Bayer Healthcare, GTC Biotherapeutics, NovoNordisk, Pfizer, CSL Behring, Inspiration Bioscience, and Biogen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Longitudinal Analysis of Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Recombinant Factor VIII Fc Fusion Protein (rFVIIFc) in Adults/Adolescents with Severe Hemophilia a

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1413.1413 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1413-1413

Author(s):

Barbara Konkle ◽

K John Pasi ◽

David J Perry ◽

Johnny Mahlangu ◽

Savita Rangarajan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Treatment Group ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Dosing Intervals

Abstract Background: Prophylactic replacement of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is the standard of care for patients with hemophilia A; however, prophylaxis with conventional FVIII products usually requires frequent intravenous injections (3-4 times/week). The safety, efficacy, and prolonged half-life of rFVIIIFc in previously treated adults and adolescents (≥12 y) with severe hemophilia A were demonstrated in the phase 3 A-LONG study (NCT01181128, completed) and ASPIRE extension study (NCT01454739, ongoing). Here, we report cumulative long-term data on the safety and efficacy of rFVIIIFc in study participants as of the second interim data cut (8 Dec 2014). Methods: This longitudinal analysis includes cumulative data from A-LONG and ASPIRE (as of the second interim data cut 8 Dec 2014) for subjects treated with ≥1 dose of rFVIIIFc. A-LONG evaluated 2 prophylaxis regimens-individualized (IP): 25 IU/kg on Day 1 and 50 IU/kg on Day 4 to start, then 25-65 IU/kg every 3-5 days, to target a 1-3 IU/dL FVIII trough level, and weekly (WP): 65 IU/kg dosed once weekly-as well as episodic (on-demand) treatment (ET). Subjects completing A-LONG and meeting enrollment criteria for ASPIRE could participate in the IP, WP, or ET groups, or, if optimal dosing could not be achieved with IP or WP, in an additional modified prophylaxis (MP) group. Subjects could change treatment groups at any point during ASPIRE. Efficacy analyses were performed using data summarized according to the treatment group in which each subject participated, for the time period they were in that treatment group; thus, subjects may be included in the analysis of more than one group. Outcomes evaluated included: incidence of inhibitors (neutralizing antibody value ≥0.6 BU/mL identified and confirmed on 2 separate samples drawn approximately 2-4 weeks apart and performed by the central laboratory as measured by the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay), adverse events (AEs), annualized bleeding rate (ABR), treatment of acute bleeds, and prophylactic consumption and dosing interval compared to pre-A-LONG (prestudy). Results: Of 164 subjects dosed with rFVIIIFc during A-LONG, 153 completed the study and 150 enrolled in ASPIRE; at the time of this second interim data cut, 97 subjects were ongoing in ASPIRE, 40 subjects had completed the study, and 13 subjects withdrew. Cumulatively, subjects had 38,662 rFVIIIFc exposure days (EDs), inclusive of surgery. As of this second interim data cut (8 Dec 2014), no inhibitors were observed; the type and incidence of adverse events (AEs) observed were typical of previous hemophilia A populations studied. There were no reports of anaphylaxis or serious hypersensitivity events, and no serious vascular thrombotic events. Median ABRs for subjects on IP and WP (MP was not an option during A-LONG) were lower with rFVIIIFc compared with prestudy FVIII for subjects on prestudy prophylaxis or ET (Figure). In the IP group, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) spontaneous ABRs in Years 1, 2, and 3 on-study were 0.0 (0.0, 2.0), 0.0 (0.0, 1.0), and 0.0 (0.0, 1.0), respectively. In the WP treatment group, the median (IQR) spontaneous ABRs in Years 1, 2, and 3 on-study were 1.0 (0.5, 3.0), 0.5 (0.0, 2.1), and 0.0 (0.0, 1.0), respectively. Overall, 88.5% and 97.0% of bleeding episodes were controlled with 1 or ≤2 intervenous injections, respectively. Among subjects treated with FVIII prophylaxis prestudy (n = 79), 86% were dosed at least 3 times/week prestudy. Compared with prestudy dosing intervals, dosing intervals with rFVIIIFc were extended in 96.2% of subjects, were shortened in 2.5% of subjects, and were unchanged in 1.3% of subjects. The median (IQR) total weekly prophylactic consumption was comparable (prestudy FVIII: 78.0 [60.0, 102.0] IU/kg; on-study rFVIIIFc: 75.0 [70.0, 113.8] IU/kg). Conclusions: Longitudinal data from patients with severe hemophilia A treated with rFVIIIFc in A-LONG and ASPIRE confirm long-term safety, with no inhibitors observed in any subject. Low median ABRs were maintained, and rFVIIIFc demonstrated efficacy in the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes. Prophylactic dosing intervals were extended, without an increase in median prophylactic factor consumption. This research was funded by Biogen and Sobi. Biogen and Sobi reviewed and provided feedback on the abstract. The authors had full editorial control of the abstract and provided their final approval of all content. Disclosures Pasi: Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; SOBI: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Perry:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mahlangu:Bayer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Biogen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Baxalta: Consultancy. Rangarajan:Baxter: Research Funding; Baxalta, now part of Shire: Other: Investigator Clinical Studies, Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy; Biotest: Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding. Brown:Baxter: Consultancy; Biogen: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy. Hanabusa:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KaketsuKen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Biogen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pabinger:Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cristiano:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tsao:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Winding:Sobi: Employment. Glazebrook:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lethagen:Sobi: Employment. Jackson:Biogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Baxalta/Shire: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Baxter: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

99.3% of Inhibitors in Severe Hemophilia a Develop before Exposure Day 75. Time to Change Definition of Previously Treated Patients; Data from 1038 Patients with Severe Hemophilia a of the Pednet Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114518 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2472-2472

Author(s):

Marijke Van den Berg ◽

Kathelijn Fischer ◽

Elena Santagostino ◽

Herve Chambost ◽

Karin Kurnik ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hemophilia A ◽

Severe Hemophilia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Inhibitor Development ◽

Previously Treated Patients ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Definition Of

Abstract Introduction.In patients with hemophilia treated with factor VIII products, the development of inhibitory antibodies poses the largest safety risk. Especially during the first 50 exposure days (EDs), up to 37% of patients with severe hemophilia A have been reported to develop an inhibitor. To study neo-immunogenicity of products and new treatment strategies, patients have been distinguished into previously untreated (PUPs) and previously treated patients (PTPs); the latter defined as patients treated for more than 150 EDs. The number of 150 EDs was established in the eighties during a time when most patients received on-demand treatment and testing for inhibitors was not frequently performed. More recent studies on inhibitor incidence in PUPs with severe hemophilia A report that 50% of inhibitors develop within 14-15 EDs, however the cut-off number of EDs for a PUP to become a PTP is not well defined. The aim of this study was to define the number of EDs for PUPs to become PTPs based on long-term follow-up of patients with severe hemophilia A Methods.All patients with severe hemophilia A born after January 1, 2000, treated for at least 1 ED and followed prospectively until inhibitor development or the number of EDs at last follow-up, were included. The number of EDs at inhibitor development is the last exposure day before the first positive titer was reported. An inhibitor was defined as positive when at least two positive inhibitor titers were measured. Positivity was defined according to the cut-off level in each individual center's laboratory. Results.Of 1,038 PUPs with severe hemophilia A, 930 (89.6%) were followed until 75 EDs, 429 until 500 EDs and 212 until 1000 EDs. In total, 300 inhibitors developed, of which 298 (99.3%) within the first 75 EDs. Thereafter only two inhibitors developed, both low titer: after 249 and 264 EDs. Conclusion.Almost all inhibitors develop during the first 75 EDs. Patients with severe hemophilia A can be defined as PTP after 75 instead of 150 exposure days. A change of definition of PTP will increase the number of severe hemophilia A patients eligible for new therapies. Disclosures Santagostino: Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Male:SOBI: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Oldenburg:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Liesner:Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Other: Clinical study investigator for NuProtect Study (Octapharma sponsored), Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Carcao:Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL-Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nolan:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Álvarez-Roman:Shire: Consultancy; NovoNordisk: Consultancy; SOBI: Consultancy. Koenigs:Gilead: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Intersero: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Roche/Chugai: Consultancy; EU (IMI, FP7): Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jansen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text