scholarly journals Safety Profile of Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsies Performed By the Hospitalist Procedure Service at an Academic Center: An Observational Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5848-5848
Author(s):  
Jennifer U Obasi ◽  
Adrian P Umpierrez De Reguero

Background: Bone marrow sampling is an invasive procedure that can be obtained by aspiration and biopsy(also called trephine biopsy) and as such, requires good technical skills to avoid complications and increase diagnostic yield. Aspirate and biopsy samples are complementary and when obtained together, are an invaluable tool toward obtaining an accurate and comprehensive profile for cellular, cytogenetic, immunophenotypic and cytological assessments. Bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy are generally regarded as relatively low risk procedures, however, factors that should be taken into consideration include disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, factor deficiencies, skin infections, and severe thrombocytopenia. In adults, the posterior iliac crest is often the preferred site but other accessed sites include the sternum (aspiration only) and anterior superior iliac crest in obese patients.For procedures performed at the posterior iliac spine, possible complications include pain, bleeding and infection. The hospitalist procedure service is a relatively newer advent that make up a subset of hospital medicine practice, mostly in larger academic centers. They are made up of internal medicine faculty with additional procedural training and expertise in bedside procedural care. Depending on the institution, the service performs a variety of procedures with lumbar punctures, thoracentesis and paracentesis, comprising a bulk of them. Other services include bone marrow sampling, arthrocentesis and chest tube placement. The long term impact of procedure services on inpatient hospital teams continues to be an ongoing area of research, but so far, studies have shown that these services have been associated with an increase in best practice safety process measures, increased patient satisfaction, and faster access to procedures without increasing complication rates. At our institution, this procedure is performed by hematology/oncology staff and fellows and advanced practice providers (APP) in collaboration and with direct supervision by an attending physician. Direct supervision is usually unnecessary once competency is determined. Other services qualified to provide this service at our institution include the inpatient hospitalist bedside procedure service (HBPS) and interventional radiology (particularly if needed under computed tomography (CT) guidance). Other than those performed by hematology/oncology providers, the HBPS at our institution is responsible for the majority of bone marrow aspiration and biopsies performed at the bedside. Methods: We reviewed procedure records kept by the inpatient HBPS from February 2017 through May 2019. Most bone marrow sampling were performed on patients on the adult inpatient hematology/oncology service. Other inpatient services represented included Internal Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R), Cardiology and Transplant (Surgical and Medical). Informed consent was obtained from all patients and/or patient surrogates. All procedures were performed at either the right or left posterior iliac crest using a powered bone marrow biopsy device (Teleflex Arrow On-Control) with an 11 gauge bone access needle, either 4 or 6 inches in length. The site was obtained via landmarks with the patient in either the prone or lateral decubitus position. Specific orders for the procedure were placed by the inpatient clinician/practitioner requesting the procedure. A technician was present at bedside to prepare slides. Results: Of the 233 patients on which bone marrow aspirates and/or biopsies were attempted, 217 (93%) were performed successfully. 16 (7%) were unsuccessful with those patients subsequently referred to interventional radiology for placement under CT guidance. Of the procedures which were successful, 181 (83.4%) were successful with the first attempt, while 36 (16.6%) required more than one attempt. 1 (0.4%) patient experienced a procedural complication secondary to a hematoma. Conclusions: We propose that bone marrow sampling performed by a hospitalist procedure services is a safe and efficacious option and alternative for busy inpatient hematology/oncology services as it can provide faster access to care for patients who need the procedure. It also helps liberate hematology/oncology providers from performing these procedures to allow them the opportunity to focus on patient care and rounds. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2005 ◽  
Vol 57 (suppl_4) ◽  
pp. ONS-286-ONS-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott H. Kitchel ◽  
Michael Y. Wang ◽  
Carl L. Lauryssen

Abstract OBJECTIVE: The osteogenicity of bone marrow has been well documented in the literature. The use of bone marrow as a source of osteoprogenitor cells for spinal fusion surgery is increasing. Improper aspiration technique can lead to dilution of bone marrow and a subsequent reduction in osteoprogenitor cells. Therefore, correct aspiration technique is imperative to the successful use of bone marrow with various grafting combinations. METHODS: The authors describe techniques for aspirating bone marrow from the anterior and posterior iliac crest, as well as vertebral body aspiration. The use of selective cell retention to increase the number of osteoprogenitor cells populating a graft is also described. RESULTS: Complications from bone marrow aspiration can occur, but the incidence is rare. CONCLUSION: Clinical studies currently under way will answer the question of bone marrow efficacy in spinal fusion surgery.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4548-4548
Author(s):  
Enrique Davila

Abstract Abstract 4548 The aspiration and biopsy of the bone marrow is one of the most valuable and important tests in hematology, oncology and medicine. It is a high yield, safe, fast and informative test performed frequently in medical practice with minimal complications. For reasons of ease and safety, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy are usually obtained from the posterior iliac crest. I reviewed my experience in obtaining 37 consecutive bone marrow biopsies from the sternum using a Jamshidi needle (gauge 11; external diameter 3.048 mm) in 36 consecutive patients (twice in one patient) over a 9 year period, in whom a posterior iliac crest study could not be done. Technique After performing the sternal bone marrow aspiration in the usual manner, a small skin incision is made over the sternum with a scalpel. The Jamshidi needle is introduced at approximately a 90 degree angle in the middle of the sternum at the level of the 3rd intercostal space. After a ”give” is felt, indicating that the needle has reached the bone marrow cavity, the tip of the needle is angled downwards at 45 degrees or less and with a clockwise - counterclockwise movement, the needle is advanced for 3 to 10 mm. After a slight change of angle aiming at “breaking” the distal attachment of the bone marrow piece, the needle is slowly withdrawn with the same rotatory movements. In no case did I feel that I had reached the inner table of the sternum. All patients were observed and examined 20 minutes and 24 hours after the procedure. Results There were 22 inpatient and 15 outpatient procedures. The reasons that precluded the performance of the preferred posterior iliac crest bone marrow biopsy were: immobility in 17 patients, obesity in 13, prior radiation in 3 and other in 4. The final diagnosis was a malignant disorder in 17 patients (leukemia, lymphoma, myelodysplasia, plasma cell dyscrasia or metastatic cancer). All but one were new diagnoses. In 20 cases the final diagnosis was a benign hematological disorder or a non diagnostic bone marrow examination. In 9 occasions (mostly obese patients and patients with prior radiation therapy) a previous attempt at performing a posterior iliac crest biopsy had failed. The only complications were the development of a tumor nodule in the needle tract in one patient with an aggressive, Burkitt's type lymphoma and a small superficial hematoma in a patient with a highly vascular metastatic breast cancer. The bone marrow core biopsy of the sternum, performed as described, in the hands of an experienced practitioner is a safe and helpful test in the evaluation of the bone marrow cytology, architecture and anatomy in selected patients in whom the performance of the preferred posterior iliac crest biopsy cannot be done. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2377-2384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Hernigou ◽  
Laure Picard ◽  
Alexandra Alves ◽  
Jonathan Silvera ◽  
Yasuhiro Homma ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Sarigianni ◽  
Efthymia Vlachaki ◽  
Sofia Chissan ◽  
Filippos Klonizakis ◽  
Evaggelia Vetsiou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-206
Author(s):  
Kavya J ◽  
Kalpana Kumari MK

Pancytopenia is commonly reported in clinical hematology practice. Due to its varied marrow pathology and underlying ailments, diagnosis is often misleading and delayed. Bone marrow examination would provide a comprehensive diagnosis of both blood and bone marrow, since aspirate investigates the cytological morphology and biopsy evaluates the cellularity, architecture, and compact marrows.To compare bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy results in the diagnosis of pancytopenia, and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of aspirate examination in pancytopenia diagnosis.This prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital from July 2014 to June 2016. A total of 320 samples were received at the department of pathology for bone marrow examination (aspirate and biopsy). Romanowsky (Leishman) stain was used to investigate aspirate samples. All biopsy samples were processed into 3-5 μ blocks and stained using hematoxylin and eosin after decalcification with 5.5% EDTA. Data analysis was performed using SPSS19.Pancytopenia constituted 56 (18.7%) cases with the mean age of 41.79 years. Of the total pancytopenia cases, hematological disorders constituted 50 (89.3%) cases and 6 (10.7%) were non-hematological cases. Aspirate and biopsy diagnosis positively correlated in 76.79% of cases. A 100% sensitivity and specificity of aspirate diagnosis was observed in, acute myeloid leukemia, hypersplenism, myelodysplastic syndrome, megaloblastic anemia, hematological malignancy in remission and negative for lymphoma infiltrate. Aspirate had no role in diagnosis of uremic osteodystrophy and myelofibrosis, whereas leishmaniasis was diagnosed on aspirate alone.Pancytopenia includes multiple underlying ailments which requires a differential diagnosis approach. Combining both aspirate and biopsy for diagnosis would benefit the patient in prognosis as they are complementary to each other.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (03) ◽  
pp. 182-189
Author(s):  
Meenu Gilotra ◽  
Monika Gupta ◽  
Sunita Singh ◽  
Rajeev Sen

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Bone marrow examination is a useful investigative tool for the diagnosis of many hematological and nonhematological disorders. Bone marrow aspiration (BMA) provides information about the numerical and cytological features of marrow cells, whereas bone marrow trephine biopsies (BMB) provide excellent appreciation of spatial relationships between cells and of overall bone marrow structure. We conducted this study with the objective of comparing the accuracy of BMA with BMB in the diagnosis of various hematological disorders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Both BMA and BMB were performed on a total of 130 cases and a comparative evaluation was performed in 100 cases to see the complementary role of both the procedures. However, 30 cases were excluded due to inadequate BMA, BMB, or both. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was employed whenever required. RESULTS: In our study of 100 cases, 87% of cases were confirmed on bone marrow biopsy and in remaining 13% of cases final diagnosis was achieved with the help of other ancillary investigations. These cases were excluded for calculation of concordance rate between BMA and BMB. The concordance and disconcordance rate between BMA and BMB was 72.4% and 27.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: BMA cytology and trephine biopsy histopathology complement each other and the superiority of one method over the other depended on the underlying disorder. Furthermore, application of ancillary techniques such as flow cytometery and IHC proved to be an additional advantage in further typing of various diseases.


2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-210
Author(s):  
Hazera Khatun ◽  
Salma Afrose ◽  
Mohiuddin Ahmed Khan ◽  
Tasneem Ara ◽  
Mohammad Sirajul Islam ◽  
...  

Bone marrow aspiration (BMA) and biopsy (BMTB) are important investigations for diagnosis of haematolgical malignancies and non-malignant diseases both in adults and children. BMA and BMTB are complementary and if both are done a comprehensive analysis of bone marrow involvement is possible. 53 cases of BMTB were studied in order to underscore the indications and importance of BMTB. BMTB was done to determine cellularity in aplastic anaemia (AA) (33.96%, n=18) and in cases of failure of aspiration (32.08%, n=17). Failure of aspiration was attributable to bone marrow (BM) fibrosis (76%, n=13) due to acute leukaemia (35.30%, n=6) and myelofibrosis (43.17%, n=7). BMTB upstaged non Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) from IIIB to IVB in 22.22% cases. 1 case of AA showed focal lymphoid aggregate which later evolved into acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). BMTB is a safe procedure and increased bleeding was noted only in a case of polycythaemia vera. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jdmc.v22i2.21544 J Dhaka Medical College, Vol. 22, No.2, October, 2013, Page 207-210


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document