scholarly journals Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2/3 Study of Recombinant Crisantaspase Produced in Pseudomonas Fluorescens (RC-P) in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) Following Hypersensitivity to Escherichia coli-Derived Asparaginases

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2586-2586
Author(s):  
Luke Maese ◽  
Rachel E. Rau ◽  
Elizabeth A. Raetz ◽  
Tong Lin ◽  
Jin Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
To Receive

Background: L-asparaginase, an important component of ALL therapy, hydrolyzes the nonessential amino acid asparagine, depleting plasma levels and selectively killing leukemic lymphoblasts that are asparagine autotrophs. L-asparaginases are immunogenic and can induce hypersensitivity reactions; high neutralizing antibody titers may limit their therapeutic effect. The inability to receive asparaginase secondary to hypersensitivity has prognostic implications for patients with ALL and has been associated with significantly worse outcomes (Silverman LB, et al. Blood 2001;97:1211-1218; Gupta S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37[suppl]: Abstract 10005). Alternative preparations are needed to ensure that all patients unable to receive E. coli-derived asparaginase due to hypersensitivity are able to receive adequate treatment. RC-P is a recombinant crisantaspase. Due to the use of a novel Pseudomonas fluorescens technology expression platform, RC-P has no immunologic cross-reactivity to E. coli-derived asparaginases. In a study of RC-P administration in healthy adults (JZP458-101), the enzyme was well tolerated and maintained adequate (≥0.1 IU/mL) serum asparaginase activity (SAA), a surrogate marker for asparagine depletion, for up to 72 hours. Study Design and Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, dose confirmation and pharmacokinetic (PK) study (JZP458-201) of RC-P in patients with ALL or LBL who develop allergic reactions to an E. coli-derived asparaginase and have ≥1 dose of E. coli-derived asparaginase remaining in their treatment plan (Table). For these patients, 6 doses of RC-P will be substituted for each dose of long-acting E. coli-derived asparaginase. Individual patient treatment duration will vary depending on the number of E. coli-derived asparaginase doses that remain in the patient's original treatment plan. The study will consist of 2 sequential parts: Part A will determine the dose of RC-P for intramuscular (IM) administration and confirm safety and efficacy; Part B will define the optimal dose and schedule of intravenous (IV) RC-P. Blood samples will be collected at prespecified time points to determine SAA levels, and patients will be monitored for adverse events. Immunogenicity of RC-P treatment will also be assessed. The primary objectives are to (1) determine the efficacy of IM RC-P administration measured by the last 72-hour nadir SAA (NSAA) level being ≥0.1 IU/mL during the first course of treatment, and (2) assess the safety and tolerability of IM RC-P in patients with ALL/LBL who are hypersensitive to E. coli-derived asparaginases. Secondary objectives include determination of the efficacy of IM RC-P measured by the last 48-hour and last 72-hour NSAA levels being ≥0.4 IU/mL during the first course, characterization of PK of IM RC-P using a population PK approach, and assessment of immunogenicity following repeat administration of RC-P. Exploratory objectives include determination of the efficacy, safety, PK, and immunogenicity of IV RC-P. Disclosures Raetz: Pfizer: Research Funding. Lin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhu:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kim:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chandula:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. McClung:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gray:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Choi:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Loh:Medisix Therapeutics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Adamson:Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amneal Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Allergan: Equity Ownership; Gilad Sciences: Equity Ownership; Medtronic: Equity Ownership; Merck: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Eisa: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; United Therapeutics: Research Funding; Sanofi/Aventis: Research Funding; Jubilant Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Cancer Prevention Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Springworks: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: The abstract presents data from an investigational agent.

scholarly journals Interim Results from Fight-203, a Phase 2, Open-Label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Pemigatinib (INCB054828) in Patients with Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms with Rearrangement of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 690-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Alessandro M. Vannucchi ◽  
Alessandro Rambaldi ◽  
Jason R. Gotlib ◽  
Adam J. Mead ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phosphate Binders ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Lymphoid Neoplasms ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms (MLNs) with rearrangement of FGFR1 on chromosome band 8p11 are rare but aggressive neoplasms characterized by heterogeneous presentation with myeloid and/or lymphoid proliferation, extramedullary involvement, and rapid progression to blast phase (Strati P, et al., Leuk Lymphoma. 2018;59:1672-1676). FGFR1 gets constitutively activated through fusion genes involving various partner genes, most frequently ZMYM2-FGFR1 or BCR-FGFR1 as consequence of a t(8;13)(p11;q12) or a t(8;22)(p11;q11), respectively. Chemotherapy is usually ineffective, effective targeted treatment has not been described, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) is the only potentially curative option. Pemigatinib, a selective, potent, oral inhibitor of FGFR1, 2, and 3, has shown efficacy in patients with FGF/FGFR-activated tumors, including cholangiocarcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. We report interim results from the ongoing fight-203 study (NCT03011372) of pemigatinib in patients with FGFR1-rearranged MLNs. Methods: Fight-203 is a phase 2, open-label study enrolling patients ≥ 18 years of age with FGFR1-rearranged MLN. Patients enrolled in the study must have progressed on ≥ 1 prior treatment and be ineligible for alloHSCT. Patients receive a daily oral dose of pemigatinib 13.5 mg on a 21-day cycle (2 weeks on, 1 week off) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is overall clinical benefit rate, which includes complete clinical (CR) or partial clinical response (PR), and either complete or partial cytogenetic response (CCyR, PCyR). Secondary endpoints include duration of response/benefit, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety/tolerability. Efficacy is assessed by evaluation of bone marrow histomorphology changes, standard cytogenetic and FISH evaluation of the FGFR1 rearrangement, and PET/CT scan. Results: At data cutoff (July 23, 2018), 14 patients were enrolled. Ten patients who had ≥ 1 response assessment were included in the analysis (Table). Patients received an average of 6.9 cycles of pemigatinib (range, 2-12 cycles). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 0-5), including 2 patients who received alloHSCT. Eight patients (80%) had a major CyR, including 6 patients with CCyR and 2 with PCyR. Eight patients (80%) had a CR or PR in bone marrow, peripheral blood, and extramedullary disease. One patient died of progression to myeloid blast crisis, 2 patients were bridged to alloHSCT, and 7 patients are ongoing. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were hyperphosphatemia (n=7 [70%]), diarrhea (n=5 [50%]) and anemia (n=5 [50%]); hyperphosphatemia was managed with diet and phosphate binders. Nine events in 4 patients (40%) were grade 3/4; 2 of these events (diarrhea and leukopenia) in 2 patients were related to pemigatinib. There were no drug-related AEs leading to dose interruption, dose reduction, or discontinuation. Conclusions: Pemigatinib showed promising efficacy, with an 80% major CyR rate accompanied by complete or partial remission, and was generally well tolerated by patients with FGFR1-rearranged MLN. The protocol was amended to allow continuous dosing, and the study is currently enrolling. Disclosures Verstovsek: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gotlib:Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Kartos: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Mead:Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Evotek: Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy; Cell Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Elstar: Research Funding. Hochhaus:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kiladjian:AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hernandez Boluda:Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Asatiani:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lihou:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhen:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reiter:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Update On the Phase IIb, Open-Label Study of Vorinostat in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3890-3890 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Siegel ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Thorsten Graef ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cutaneous Manifestations ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3890 Poster Board III-826 Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by the accumulation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow. MM accounts for approximately 1% of all new cancer diagnoses and is the second most common hematologic malignancy in adults. Despite recent advances in therapy, MM remains largely incurable and there is a need to develop new treatments or treatment regimens to combat MM. Vorinostat is an oral histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor approved for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations of T-cell lymphoma in patients with progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. As HDACs are over-expressed and involved in the regulation of transcription with recruitment by oncogenic transcription factors in a variety of tumor types, the efficacy of vorinostat is currently under investigation in a number of hematologic and solid malignancies, including MM. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has provided significant survival advantages for patients with MM. Preclinical studies have shown that the combination of vorinostat and bortezomib synergistically induces MM cell apoptosis. Results from two Phase I studies showed that the combination of vorinostat and bortezomib (+/- dexamethasone) is well tolerated and achieves ∼ 40% objective response rate in a relapsed/refractory MM population, even in those patients who were refractory to prior bortezomib treatment (Weber et al. Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma 2009;9:S44, abstract A248) (Weber et al. Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma 2009; 9:S42, abstract A242). Encouraging results observed in these trials led to the design of a Phase IIb, international, multicenter, open-label study that will assess the efficacy and tolerability of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in advanced MM patients. Methods Patients (aged ≥18 years) with relapsed and refractory MM after two prior treatment regimens, including at least one bortezomib-containing regimen, and who are relapsed, refractory, intolerant, or ineligible for other therapies, including immunomodulatory agents, were included in this trial. Patients received intravenous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and oral vorinostat 400 mg once daily on Days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle. The addition of oral dexamethasone (20 mg on the day of and day after each bortezomib dose) was permitted for patients who experienced disease progression after two treatment cycles or no change (stable disease) after four cycles, until further disease progression. The primary endpoint is objective response rate and secondary endpoints include assessment of: safety, time to disease progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Patient-reported outcomes were collected in this study as an exploratory objective. Study enrollment At the time of submission, 38 patients (out of 142) have been enrolled in the trial. A first interim futility analysis is planned after the 43rd patient has been enrolled. At the time of the meeting, safety data, along with enrollment status and timelines for future data read-outs, will be reported. Disclosures: Siegel: Celegne: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that was approved in the FDA in October 2006 for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. Jagannath:Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Lonial:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gloucester: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Graef:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pietrangelo:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lupinacci:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reiser:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rizvi:Merck: Employment. Anderson:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Ruxolitinib Efficacy By Hematocrit Control in Patients with Polycythemia Vera: An Analysis of the RESPONSE Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3201-3201
Author(s):  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Ruben Mesa ◽  
Mark M Jones ◽  
Shui He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polycythemia Vera ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Jak2 Inhibitor ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Response Trial

Abstract Background: Polycythemia vera (PV) is characterized by erythrocytosis and overactive JAK/STAT activity. The RESPONSE trial compared ruxolitinib (RUX), a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, with best available therapy (BAT) in patients (pts) with PV intolerant of or resistant to hydroxyurea according to modified European LeukemiaNet criteria. RUX was superior to BAT in achieving the primary endpoint (21% vs 1%; P<0.0001), and 60% of pts randomized to RUX achieved protocol-defined hematocrit (HCT) control through Wk 32 vs 20% of pts randomized to BAT (J Clin Oncol32:5s, 2014; suppl, abstract 7026). However, the actual phlebotomy rate between Wks 8−32 was only 20% in pts randomized to RUX compared with 62% in pts randomized to BAT, and 85% of pts in the RUX arm continued to receive treatment at the median 81-wk follow-up, suggesting most pts derived some benefit from RUX. Therefore, an analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy of RUX in pts who did and did not achieve protocol-defined HCT control. Methods: Phlebotomy-dependent PV pts with splenomegaly, aged ≥18 years, and resistant to or intolerant of HU were enrolled. Pts were required to have HCT between 40%−45% 14 days prior to randomization; those who did not could enter a phlebotomy control period to achieve a HCT in this range within 14 days of randomization. Eligible pts were randomized 1:1 to RUX or BAT. BAT pts could cross over to receive RUX from Wk 32 if they had not met the primary endpoint, or after Wk 32 due to protocol-defined disease progression. The primary composite endpoint comprised HCT control and a ≥35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume (SV) at Wk 32. HCT control was defined as lack of phlebotomy eligibility between Wks 8−32 with no more than 1 phlebotomy eligibility between randomization and Wk 8. Phlebotomy eligibility was based on protocol-defined HCT values (regardless of receipt of phlebotomy), and pts with missing data or assessments outside of protocol-defined time windows were considered non-responders. In pts who were HCT control non-responders (HCT-N) as defined by protocol, time to second phlebotomy eligibility was evaluated. For this analysis, pts without phlebotomy eligibility were excluded and phlebotomies in the first 8 wks were not considered. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated in both HCT control responders (HCT-R) and HCT-N, including the 14-item modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Results: Of 222 randomized pts (RUX, n=110; BAT, n=112), most were male (RUX, 60%; BAT, 71%) and the median age (range) was similar between treatment arms (RUX, 62.0 [34.0–90.0]; BAT, 60.0 [33.0–84.0]). Although pts had a HCT between 40% and 45% within 14 days prior to randomization (with or without phlebotomy), 24% of pts had a HCT >45% on Day 1 (similar between treatment arms) illustrating that many pts have poor HCT control over short intervals of observation. RUX treatment resulted in long-term benefits on HCT levels, even in pts who did not achieve protocol-defined HCT control through Wk 32. Among the RUX HCT-R group, the probability of maintaining HCT response was 97% at 48 wks and 87% at 80 wks. Most BAT pts crossed over to receive RUX immediately after the Wk 32 visit (84% between Wks 32 and 48). In the RUX HCT-N pts, the median time to subsequent phlebotomy eligibility was 52 wks, compared with 21 wks for BAT HCT-N pts (Figure). Compared with the entire BAT group, more RUX-R and RUX-N pts had a ≥50% improvement in the MPN-SAF total symptom score at Wk 32 (RUX-N, 38%; RUX-R, 40%; BAT, 4%). Median changes from baseline at Wk 32 in key symptoms such as tiredness (RUX-N; −50%; RUX-R, −49%; BAT, −4%), itching (RUX-N, −88%; RUX-R, −97%; BAT, −2%), and night sweats (RUX-N, −100%; RUX-R, −97%; BAT, 4%) were also greater among RUX-R and RUX-N pts than BAT pts. RUX-N and RUX-R pts were also more likely to consider their symptoms to be “much improved” or “very much improved” on the PGIC compared with BAT pts (RUX-N, 57%; RUX-R, 74%; BAT, 13%). Conclusion: Among pts receiving RUX who did not achieve protocol-defined HCT control, the median time to subsequent phlebotomy eligibility was 1 year. In contrast, pts on BAT had a median time to subsequent phlebotomy eligibility of 21 wks. Furthermore, pts in the RUX arm achieved meaningful improvements in PV-related symptoms, regardless of meeting the endpoint of HCT control, while pts treated with BAT showed worsening or no improvement. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Verstovsek: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ruxolitinib is a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis, including primary myelofibrosis, post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Kiladjian:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Mesa:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Jones:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. He:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Habr:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vannucchi:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Pomalidomide in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone: Demonstrates a Significant Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival Advantage, in Relapsed/Refractory MM: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. LBA-6-LBA-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Martha Q Lacy ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Katja C Weisel ◽  
Kevin W. Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract LBA-6 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) patients who have become refractory to bortezomib (BORT) and refractory or otherwise ineligible for thalidomide or lenalidomide (LEN) have a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 9 months (Kumar. Leukemia. 2012). There is no standard treatment available for these patients. Pomalidomide (POM) is a novel immunomodulatory drug that has shown activity in LEN- and BORT-refractory patients (Vij. ASCO 2012). MM-003 is an open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of POM + low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) vs high-dose dexamethasone (HiDEX) in a population of patients who are refractory to both LEN and BORT. Here we present the final progression-free survival (PFS) and interim OS analysis of MM-003. Methods: Eligible patients with primary refractory or relapsed and refractory disease were enrolled. All patients with documented disease progression during treatment or within 60 days of completing their last myeloma therapy (including ≥ 2 consecutive cycles of LEN and BORT either alone or in combination), were randomized 2:1 to receive either POM + LoDEX (arm A) or HiDEX alone (arm B). Patients progressing on HiDEX had the opportunity to receive POM in the companion trial, MM-003C. Patients in arm A received POM 4 mg on days 1–21 and DEX 40 mg (20 mg for patients > 75 years of age) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in a 28-day cycle. Patients in arm B received DEX 40 mg (20 mg for patients > 75 years of age) on days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20 in a 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were stratified by age (≤ 75 vs > 75 years), disease population (refractory vs refractory and relapsed vs refractory and intolerant [intolerant to BORT only]), and number of prior therapies (2 vs > 2). The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included safety, OS, overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response) by IMWG and EBMT criteria, duration of response, time to progression, and quality of life. OS was to be tested only if PFS would be statistically significant; therefore, alpha was controlled at 0.05 2-sided for both PFS and OS. Results: The Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) reviewed the protocol-specified final analysis results. 455 patients were randomized from March 2011 to Sept 2012. 302 patients received POM + LoDEX, and 153 patients received HiDEX. At the time of analysis, 45% of patients in arm A and 25% of patients in arm B remained on study. The median number of prior therapies was 5 (range, 1–17). 72% of patients were refractory to both LEN and BORT. At the PFS final analysis, with a median follow-up of 18 weeks, PFS was significantly longer with POM + LoDEX vs HiDEX alone (median 15.7 vs 8.0 weeks; 267 total events; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; P <.001). OS interim analysis was performed as planned; OS also was significantly longer with POM + LoDEX vs HiDEX alone (median not reached vs 34 weeks; 134 events; HR, 0.53; P<.001), crossing the prespecified O’brien-Fleming superiority boundary. This includes 45 pts who received POM after progressing on HiDEX. Median duration of treatment was 12.4 weeks in arm A and 8 weeks in arm B. Following DSMB review of the data, immediate crossover of arm B patients to arm A was recommended. Overall, 25% of patients in arm A and 38% in arm B died, with progressive disease and infections as the primary reasons. Frequent grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (42% in arm A vs 15% in arm B), thrombocytopenia (21% vs 24%), and febrile neutropenia (7% vs 0%). Other toxicities (grade 3/4) were predominantly infections (24% vs 23%), hemorrhage (3% vs 5%), glucose intolerance (3% vs 7%), neuropathy (1% vs 1%), and venous thromboembolism (1% vs 0%). The primary reason for discontinuation was progressive disease: 35% arm A and 49% arm B. Complete results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: POM + LoDEX significantly increased PFS and OS compared with HiDEX in patients who are refractory to LEN and BORT, a population with limited treatment options. The OS superiority boundary was crossed. Based on these data, POM + LoDEX should become the new standard of care in patients who have exhausted the novel agents, LEN and BORT. Disclosures: Dimopoulos: Celgene: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide is an investigational drug and is not approved for the treatment of patients with any condition. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Moreau:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Weisel:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Song:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Delforge:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Karlin:Celgene: Consultancy. Goldschmidt:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Yu:Celgene: Employment. Sternas:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jacques:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. San Miguel:Onyx: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Mitapivat (AG-348), an Oral PK-R Activator, in Adults with Non-Transfusion Dependent Thalassemia: A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multicenter Study in Progress

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2249-2249
Author(s):  
Kevin H. M. Kuo ◽  
D. Mark Layton ◽  
Katrin Uhlig ◽  
Megan Lynch ◽  
Li Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Ineffective Erythropoiesis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Label Study ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background: Thalassemia is a group of inherited blood disorders in which genetic mutation(s) in the α- and/or β-globin locus lead to excess precipitation of β- or α-globin, respectively, and compromised red blood cell (RBC) survival. The condition is characterized by ineffective erythropoiesis and peripheral hemolysis, with resultant anemia. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) supply appears to be insufficient in thalassemic RBCs to maintain RBC membrane fitness and clearance of globin precipitates. Mitapivat (AG-348) is an oral, small-molecule, allosteric activator of the RBC-specific form of pyruvate kinase (PK-R). PK-R is a key enzyme for maintaining energy homeostasis in RBCs, as they rely almost exclusively on the process of glycolysis to generate ATP. In healthy adults, mitapivat activates wild-type PK-R and increases ATP levels in RBCs. In adults with PK deficiency who were not regularly transfused, oral mitapivat was well tolerated and induced rapid, durable hemoglobin (Hb) increases (NCT02476916). In the Hbbth/3+ mouse model of β-thalassemia, mitapivat increased ATP levels; reduced markers of ineffective erythropoiesis; and improved anemia, RBC survival, and indices of iron overload. These data support the hypothesis that increased ATP synthesis mediated via PK-R activation by mitapivat may improve the survival of thalassemic RBCs in the bone marrow and/or peripheral circulation, and thus represents a novel mechanism to treat patients with thalassemia. Here we present the design of a phase 2, open-label study designed to test this hypothesis and assess the proof of concept of mitapivat in patients with thalassemia. Methods: This phase 2, multicenter, open-label study (NCT03692052) is evaluating the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of mitapivat in adults with non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia (NTDT). Four sites in North America and the United Kingdom are enrolling patients. The study consists of a 24-week core period followed by a 2-year extension period (Figure). Approximately 17 subjects with NTDT, i.e., β-thalassemia with or without α-globin gene mutations, HbE β-thalassemia, or α-thalassemia (HbH disease), will be enrolled. Non-transfusion dependence is defined as ≤5 units of RBCs transfused in the preceding 24 weeks and no transfusions in the 8 weeks prior to the first day of study drug. The hemoglobin inclusion criterion is ≤10.0 g/dL, which was increased from ≤9.0 g/dL in a recent protocol amendment to better reflect the clinical representation in the NTDT patient population. All eligible patients will receive an initial mitapivat dose of 50 mg twice daily (BID). At the week 6 visit the dose may be increased to 100 mg BID, depending on safety and Hb response. The primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects who achieve an Hb response, defined as an increase in Hb of ≥1.0 g/dL from baseline at any time between week 4 and week 12 (inclusive). Key secondary and exploratory endpoints include changes in Hb and markers of hemolysis; hematopoietic activity; iron metabolism and iron overload; and assessments of safety and pharmacokinetics. The study is currently enrolling. Figure Disclosures Kuo: Agios: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Layton:Cerus Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Uhlig:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lynch:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vichinsky:GBT: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Preliminary Results of a Phase 2, Open-Label Study of Venetoclax (ABT-199/GDC-0199) Monotherapy in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Relapsed after or Refractory to Ibrutinib or Idelalisib Therapy

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 715-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Jones ◽  
Anthony R. Mato ◽  
Steven Coutre ◽  
William Wierda ◽  
Michael Y. Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: The overall outcome of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who relapse after or become refractory to treatment with B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling antagonists, including ibrutinib (IBR) or idelalisib (IDE), is recently being appreciated and appears quite poor. To date, no phase 2 studies have reported efficacy in this population. Venetoclax is a selective, potent, orally bioavailable BCL-2 inhibitor with a BCR-independent mechanism of action and substantial activity in pts with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory CLL. We report preliminary results from an ongoing phase 2, open-label study evaluating venetoclax monotherapy in CLL pts relapsed after or refractory to IBR or IDE (NCT02141282). Methods: Pts with CLL relapsed after or refractory to IBR (Arm A) or IDE (Arm B) receive venetoclax monotherapy starting at 20 mg followed by a 5-step weekly ramp-up to a final daily dose of 400 mg. Pts with Richter's transformation (RT) suspected by screening PET CT or confirmed by lymph node biopsy are ineligible. The primary objectives are to assess the efficacy (investigator assessed overall response rate, ORR) and safety of venetoclax. Disease and response assessment was performed using iwCLL criteria at weeks 8, 24 and every 12 weeks thereafter. Adverse events (AEs) are monitored throughout the study. Results: As of April 30, 2015, 28 pts were enrolled in the study. Three screened pts were ineligible due to RT. Pt demographics are summarized by treatment arm in the table. Twenty-two entered into Arm A after a median duration on IBR of 15.5 months (range: 1-56). Investigator-reported best responses while on IBR prior to starting venetoclax were 14 partial response (PR), 4 stable disease (SD) and 3 progressive disease (PD); best response for 1 pt is unknown. Six entered into Arm B after a median duration on IDE of 9.7 months (range: 1-34). Investigator-reported best responses while on IDE prior to starting venetoclax were 1 complete response (CR), 3 PR and 2 SD. At last follow-up, the median time on venetoclax was 2.4 months (range: 0.1- 7) for Arm A and 1.7 months (range: 1.2-4.5) for Arm B. Venetoclax discontinuation occurred in 4 pts in Arm A (1 each due to respiratory failure, multi-organ failure, PD of RT, death of unknown cause) and in 1 pt in Arm B (PD prior to first assessment). Fifteen pts in Arm A and 3 in Arm B underwent Week 8 response assessment. In Arm A, 8/15 (53%) achieved a PR, 6/15 (40%) had SD, and 1/15 was inevaluable. In Arm B, 2/4 achieved a PR, 1/4 had SD, and 1/4 had PD prior to first assessment. Pts with SD had evidence of ongoing disease reduction, measured by decreasing circulating lymphocytes and lymph nodes. As of the cutoff date, 23 pts remain on venetoclax therapy. Compared to prior venetoclax monotherapy studies, no new safety signals for venetoclax were observed in either treatment arm. Treatment-emergent AEs (all grades) in >25% of the overall population were neutropenia (57%), anemia (35%), diarrhea (32%) and nausea (32%). Treatment-emergent grade 3/4 AEs in >10% of the overall population were neutropenia (43%; 3/12 of the neutropenic pts developed febrile neutropenia), anemia (29%), thrombocytopenia (18%), hypophosphatemia, hypoxia, leukopenia, and pneumonia (each 11%). Serious AEs in ≥2 pts overall were febrile neutropenia, increased blood potassium, multi-organ failure, and pneumonia (each 7%). Prior to study entry, 7/22 (32%) in Arm A received G-CSF support. One pt with high disease burden developed laboratory TLS in week 4, upon escalating to the 200 mg daily venetoclax dose, evident by hyperuricemia and hyperphosphatemia. Electrolytes returned to normal levels after a dose interruption and intervention. No pts experienced clinical TLS; laboratory changes were not clinically significant. Conclusions: In this group of pts with aggressive disease relapsed after or refractory to BCR-targeted agents, venetoclax monotherapy demonstrated early activity at the 8 week assessment, which occurred within 3 weeks of reaching the target 400 mg daily dose. The majority of evaluable pts achieved PR or SD. Venetoclax monotherapy exhibited a tolerable safety profile without events of clinical TLS. This is the first phase 2 study to show activity in a relatively uniform population of pts previously treated with BCR kinase inhibitors; the data suggests that venetoclax is active in these pts. Enrollment in both arms was ongoing as of the data cut. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Jones: Genentech, Pharmacyclics; institutional research funding from Abbvie, Pharmacyclics, Genentech, and Gilead: Other: Advisory Board. Off Label Use: Venetoclax is an investigational drug that is not yet approved in this indication.. Mato:AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pronai Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Coutre:AbbVie: Research Funding. Wierda:Genentech: Consultancy; AbbVie and Genentech: Research Funding. Choi:AbbVie and Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Research Funding. Davids:AbbVie and Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech and Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics, TG Therapeutics, and Infinity: Research Funding. Lamanna:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Barr:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; AbbVie and Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Burns:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Montalvo:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhu:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Busman:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Potluri:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Humerickhouse:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Byrd:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genenttech, AbbVie, Acerta, Pharmacyclics: Other: Unpaid consultant.

scholarly journals Open-Label Pilot Study of Genetically Engineered NY-ESO-1 Specific T Cells (GSK3377794) Alone or in Combination with Pembrolizumab in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3134-3134
Author(s):  
Taiga Nishihori ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
James E. Hoffman ◽  
Kristin Blouch ◽  
Sunil Pandit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Single Infusion ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background: Emerging clinical data demonstrate that adoptive cellular therapy has potential to be practice-changing in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). NY-ESO-1 TCR T (GSK3377794) are autologous polyclonal T cells transduced by a self-inactivating lentiviral vector to express an affinity-enhanced TCR capable of recognizing NY-ESO-1 or LAGE-1a antigenic peptides in complex with HLA-A2. In prior studies, encouraging clinical activity has been observed with GSK3377794 treatment in patients with synovial sarcoma, melanoma, myxoid/round cell liposarcoma, and in MM patients receiving GSK3377794 after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1a are immunogenic cancer/testis antigens frequently overexpressed in MM and are linked to poor clinical outcome. While a number of phase 1 and 2 trials are evaluating GSK3377794 in solid tumors, this abstract presents a trial in progress aiming to evaluate safety and efficacy of GSK3377794 alone or in combination with the anti-PD1 inhibitor, pembrolizumab, in patients with MM. PD-1 expression on CD8 T cells has been observed in MM patients previously treated with GSK3377794 and can limit adaptive immune response. This has also been described as a mechanism of resistance and relapse in CD19 CAR T-cell trials (Fraietta et al, Nat Med 2018). Thus, we hypothesize that combining GSK3377794 and pembrolizumab may result in a synergistic antitumor effect. Study design and methods: This is an open-label, pilot study (NCT03168438) of GSK3377794 in patients who are HLA-A*02:01, HLA-A*02:05, and/or HLA-A*02:06 positive and have NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a positive relapsed/refractory MM. Twenty patients who have received at least three prior therapies containing at least one of the following drug classes as separate or combined lines of therapy (including ASCT): an immunomodulatory imide, proteasome inhibitor, alkylator, CD38 monoclonal antibody, and glucocorticoid, will be assigned to one of two arms: GSK3377794 alone as a single infusion (Arm 1, n=10) or GSK3377794 as a single infusion in combination with pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks (Arm 2, n=10). Enrollment of Arm 1 will be completed before enrolling subjects to Arm 2. Administration of pembrolizumab will start from Week 3 (or Week 6 if toxicities preclude Week 3 treatment). Patients will undergo leukapheresis to obtain cells for the manufacture of autologous NY-ESO-1-specific T cells. Each patient will then undergo lymphodepleting chemotherapy with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide followed by GSK3377794 infusion of 1−8x109 transduced T cells. Primary and secondary objectives are to assess safety and tolerability, and antitumor activity, respectively, of GSK3377794 treatment (with and without pembrolizumab). Patients will be monitored for adverse events and combination-related treatment-limiting toxicities; efficacy will be assessed using International Myeloma Working Group Response Criteria (Rajkumar et al, Blood 2011). In Arm 2, enrollment will be temporarily paused for a 3-week safety review period after the first 3 patients have received their first dose of pembrolizumab. Efficacy, safety, and biomarker assessments will be conducted at each visit. Patients will complete the treatment phase upon progression of disease or 108 weeks after GSK3377794 infusion. After completion of the treatment phase, patients will transfer to the long-term follow-up study (NCT03391778) to continue safety and survival monitoring for up to 15 years. As of January 27, 2019, 50 patients have undergone screening for HLA status and NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a antigen expression. Among 50 patients screened for HLA, 25 (50%) tested positive for HLA-A*02:01, 05, and/or 06. Of these patients, bone marrow samples from 12/21 (57%) tested positive for NY-ESO-1, LAGE-1a, or both, illustrating high expression of this antigen in MM. To date, 3 patients have been treated with GSK3377794, demonstrating feasibility of identifying and treating HLA/antigen-positive patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Further work is underway towards introducing flexibility in screening procedures in order to permit wider screening of patients and to minimize time between screening and leukapheresis and for cell manufacturing, which will enhance patient eligibility. Acknowledgment: Medical writing support by O Conn PhD of Fishawack Indicia Ltd, funded by GSK. This study (NCT03168438) is funded by GSK. Disclosures Nishihori: Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kaufman:Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University: Employment; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blouch:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pandit:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. Butler:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jain:GSK: Employment. Wu:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. DeYoung:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hasan:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership; Atara Biotherapeutics: Patents & Royalties; Merck: Equity Ownership.

Use of Blood Transfusions In Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Patients with and without Aplastic Anemia Enrolled In the Global PNH Registry

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2241-2241
Author(s):  
Hubert Schrezenmeier ◽  
Robert A Brodsky ◽  
Petra Muus ◽  
Monica Bessler ◽  
Jeffrey Szer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Clone Size ◽  
History Of ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Abstract 2241 Background: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare clonal hematopoietic stem cell disease characterized by complement-mediated hemolysis which can lead to life-threatening complications including thrombosis, kidney disease, pulmonary hypertension, pain, anemia, and severe fatigue. PNH clones occur in a number of patients with concomitant aplastic anemia (AA) and other bone marrow disorders (BMD). Some patients with PNH and/or BMD may require red blood cell (RBC) transfusions to treat anemia due to hemolysis or bone marrow hypoplasia. Aims: To characterize the use of RBC transfusions among PNH patients with and without underlying AA. Methods: Enrollment data from 117 clinical sites participating in the observational PNH Registry in 16 countries on 5 continents was analyzed. Patients are included in the Registry regardless of the proportion of cells with deficiency of glycosylphosphatidyl-inositol anchored proteins (GPI-AP), bone marrow pathology, symptoms, or treatments. Sites collect clinical history at enrollment and additional data every 6 months. Demographic data, use of transfusions and other treatments, lab results, and symptoms are summarized for PNH patients with and without AA. Results: As of June 30, 2010 there were 655 enrolled patients in the Registry (53% female, median age 43). At enrollment, 28% of patients had history of AA and 45% had no history of BMD. Patients with underlying AA had lower median GPI-AP deficient granulocytes than those without BMD (median = 53% vs. 86%, respectively, p<.01) and patients in both groups had similar evidence of hemolytic activity when stratified by clone size (median LDH fold above normal upper limit was 0.90 vs. 0.94, p=.39 for patients with and without AA and clone size <10%; median = 3.41 vs. 4.84, p=.08 for AA vs. no BMD and clone size ≥50%). Not all PNH patients required transfusions: 56% of all patients required transfusions in the year prior to enrollment. Although patients with and without AA were equally likely to be treated with blood transfusions in the year prior to study enrollment overall, some differences emerged when stratified by clone size. For patients with clone size <50%, AA patients were almost twice as likely to receive transfusion in the previous year as patients without BMD (39% vs. 20%, p=.08). However, regardless of underlying AA, the proportion of patients receiving transfusions, in the prior year increased as clone size increased (29%, 31%, and 69% for clone sizes <10%, 10–49%, and ≥50%, respectively, p<.01). When patients were stratified by percent reticulocytes at enrollment (below vs. above the median value of 4.16%), 45% vs. 75% received transfusion in the prior year (p<.01). Among patients receiving a transfusion in the year prior to enrollment, the mean number of RBC units transfused was 9.6 for patients with underlying AA and 7.9 for patients with no BMD (p=.10). However, approximately twice as many patients with AA received 20+ RBC units in that year compared to patients without BMD (20% vs. 11%, p=.09). Number of transfused units in that year was similar by clone size (mean 9.5 vs. 8.6 for clone size <50% vs. ≥50%, p=.57). Concomitant treatment with anticoagulants or immunosuppressants was similar among patients who had received a transfusion in the past year compared to patients with no transfusions (39% vs. 33%, p=.13 and 26% vs. 22%, p=.25 respectively). Patients with AA had more bruising and bleeding while patients without BMD had more hemoglobinuria, dysphagia, and abdominal pain. Transfused patients with AA had more fatigue than non-transfused patients with AA (68% vs. 48%, p=.02). Conclusions: A substantial proportion (56%) of patients with PNH, but not all, required at least one transfusion in the year prior to enrolling in the registry, independent of underlying AA. The proportion of patients who had at least one transfusion increased with clone size. Among patients who had at least one transfusion, there was a trend for patients with underlying AA to receive more RBC units than patients without BMD. PNH patients with AA have fewer GPI-AP deficient granulocytes but demonstrate elevated hemolysis similar to patients without history of BMD when patients with similar clone sizes were compared. This Global PNH Registry, which remains open to accrual ([email protected]), should help to redefine prospectively the long-term natural history of PNH, its treatments, and the outcomes of treatment. Disclosures: Schrezenmeier: Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brodsky: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Muus: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bessler: Alexion Pharmaceutical Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Taligen: Consultancy. Szer: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maciejewski: Celgene: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy. Socié: Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Urbano-Ispizua: Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kanakura: Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hoechsmann: Alexion: Speakers Bureau. Rosse: Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Khursigara: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Karnell: Alexion Pharma International: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bedrosian: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hillmen: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Clinical Benefit of Ruxolitinib Treatment after Crossover from Best Available Therapy in Patients with Polycythemia Vera: Analysis of the RESPONSE Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3181-3181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Alessandro M. Vannucchi ◽  
Martin Griesshammer ◽  
Tamas Masszi ◽  
Simon Durrant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Polycythemia Vera ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Response Trial

Abstract Background : Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by erythrocytosis, and in many cases leukocytosis and thrombocytosis. PV is driven by activating mutations in the JAK/STAT pathway, primarily JAK2V617F. For high-risk patients, a commonly used first-line therapy is hydroxyurea (HU); however, a subgroup of patients become intolerant of or resistant to HU. The phase 3 RESPONSE trial compared ruxolitinib (RUX) and best available therapy (BAT) in patients with PV who were intolerant of or resistant to HU (modified European LeukemiaNet criteria). Patients randomized in the BAT arm were permitted to cross over to receive RUX from Week 32 of the study. The results of the primary analysis comparing RUX to BAT prior to crossover have been reported, in which RUX was superior to BAT in achieving hematocrit control, reductions in spleen volume, and improvements in PV-related symptoms. This current analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of RUX treatment in patients who crossed over from BAT relative to their original BAT treatment and relative to those originally randomized to RUX. Methods : Enrollment criteria included PV diagnosis, age ≥18 years, resistance to or intolerance of HU, splenomegaly, and phlebotomy requirement to control hematocrit. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive open-label RUX 10 mg BID or BAT administered based on investigator judgment. BAT may have included HU, interferon/pegylated interferon, pipobroman, anagrelide, immunomodulators (eg, lenalidomide or thalidomide), or no medication. The protocol allowed for dose modifications (RUX, 5-mg BID increments [25 mg BID max]; BAT was adjusted per investigator judgment). Patients in the BAT group could cross over to RUX from Week 32 if they had not met the primary endpoint, or after Week 32 due to protocol-defined disease progression. The primary study endpoint was a composite of hematocrit control and a ≥35% reduction in spleen size at Week 32. Hematocrit was assessed at screening, every 2 weeks from Day 1 to Week 12, followed by every 4 weeks until Week 32, and 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, 24, and 32 weeks following crossover. Spleen volume was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging at screening and study Weeks 16, 32, 48, 64, 80 and every 32 weeks thereafter. The number of phlebotomy procedures was evaluated over time in each group. Results : A total of 110 patients were randomized to RUX and 112 to BAT; study discontinuation by Week 32 (before crossover was permitted) was 11% in both groups. However, most patients in the BAT arm crossed over to receive RUX treatment immediately after the Week 32 visit (84% between Weeks 32 and 48); only 3% of patients remained in the BAT arm compared with 85% in the RUX arm at the time of the data analysis (median 81-week follow-up). With up to 32 weeks on BAT therapy, 25% of patients in this group did not require a phlebotomy; in contrast, with up to 32 weeks on RUX, 79% of patients after crossover and 74% of patients initially randomized to RUX did not require phlebotomy. The number of phlebotomy procedures adjusted for 100 patient-years during BAT therapy was 196.8 vs 38.5 after crossover to RUX and 34.1 on randomized RUX treatment. Reduction in spleen volume from baseline at any visit occurred in 49% of patients receiving BAT, vs 73% of patients after crossover to RUX and 88% of patients initially randomized to RUX. The proportion of patients achieving at least a 35% reduction in spleen volume (best percentage change) was 1.8% during BAT treatment vs 38.5% after crossover to RUX and 60.0% during randomized RUX treatment. Conclusion : Treatment with RUX after crossover from BAT resulted in improved clinical outcomes compared with original BAT treatment. These findings support the primary RESPONSE results and further validate the efficacy of RUX in this patient population. Disclosures Kiladjian: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ruxolitinib is a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis, including primary myelofibrosis, post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Vannucchi:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Masszi:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Durrant:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Harrison:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Mesa:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Jones:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. He:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:Novartis Pharmaceuticals : Employment, Equity Ownership. Habr:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Verstovsek:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Exposure-Response Relationship of the SMART-Ig Anti-hC5 Antibody Crovalimab (SKY59): Results from the Umbrella Phase 1/2 Composer Trial in Healthy Volunteers and PNH Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3745-3745
Author(s):  
Alexandre Sostelly ◽  
Simon Buatois ◽  
Antoine Soubret ◽  
Erica Winter ◽  
Barbara Klughammer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Complement Inhibition ◽  
Exposure Response ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Terminal Complement

Crovalimab (RO7112689) is a novel anti-human C5 antibody engineered with Sequential Monoclonal Antibody Recycling Technology (SMART Ig)(Fukuzawa et al., Sci Rep. (2017) 7(1):1080), resulting in significant half-life extension and enabling infrequent SC dosing using small volumes (1mL - 4mL) in C5 mediated diseases. We aimed at characterizing the exposure-response relationship of crovalimab used to define the minimum concentration of crovalimab achieving complete terminal inhibition. To establish pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, efficacy, and optimal dose of crovalimab, we conducted a four-part adaptive clinical trial (Figure 1): Part 1: 15 healthy subjects were enrolled. 3 received 75 mg RO7112689 IV, 3 received 125 mg RO7112689 IV, 3 received 100 mg RO7112689 SC, and 6 received placeboPart 2: 10 treatment-naïve PNH patients were enrolled in Part 2 to receive increasing IV doses of 375mg, 500mg, and 1000mg on days 1, 8 and 22, respectively, followed by weekly doses of 170mg SC starting on day 36Part 3: 19 eculizumab pre-treated PNH patients were enrolled in Part 3 to receive 1000mg IV before randomization into 3 different arms: Arm A: 680mg SC Q4W (N=7)Arm B: 340mg SC Q2W (N=6)Arm C: 170mg SC QW (N=6) SC dosing was initiated on day 8 after the IV dose in all the dosing groups. Part 4: 5 eculizumab pre-treated PNH patients and 5 treatment-naïve PNH patients are planned to be enrolled to receive IV dose of 1000mg on Day 1 followed by SC dose of 340mg on Day 2, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22 followed by SC dose of 680mg given Q4W from Day 29 Crovalimab concentrations and free C5 were measured using a validated ELISA. A population PK model was developed using all the available data to describe the crovalimab concentration-time profiles. Crovalimab PD was assessed by evaluating the extent and duration of terminal complement inhibition, quantified using a validated, functional ex vivo liposome immunoassay (LIA) (http://www.wakodiagnostics.com/r_ch50.html). Relationships between crovalimab PK and PD were analyzed using graphical analysis. The PK was best described by a two-compartment open model with first-order elimination and absorption. To describe the PK in eculizumab pre-treated patients, elimination of crovalimab was modeled as a combination of the first-order elimination used for naïve patients and a faster clearance which decreases exponentially over time. Body weight was introduced using allometry on the clearance and volume of the distribution. After SC administration, bioavailability is estimated at 100% and terminal half-life around 30 days. In all PNH patients, complete complement inhibition (defined as LIA <10 U/ml, the LLOQ of the assay) was achieved immediately after end of infusion following the initial dose and maintained across the different dosing intervals investigated in the majority of the patients (Figure 2). Complete inhibition of free C5 (defined as free C5 <0.05μg/mL) was also achieved after end of infusion and maintained throughout the dosing intervals reflecting the LIA profiles. By pooling all the PK and PD data from the 3 parts of the COMPOSER study, crovalimab was shown to induce a concentration-dependent inhibition of serum hemolytic activity and of free C5 which closely correlates with terminal complement inhibition. Collectively, these data indicate that approximately 100μg/mL of crovalimab are required to achieve complement inhibition (Figure 3). At the target concentration of crovalimab between 80-100ug/mL, patients achieve complete terminal complement inhibition. Data collected in the ongoing Part 4 of COMPOSER will be used to confirm the target concentration of crovalimab. Exposure-response characterization demonstrated the potential of crovalimab as an infrequent, subcutaneous therapy for PNH. Disclosures Sostelly: F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Employment. Buatois:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Employment. Soubret:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership. Klughammer:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ag: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hsu:Roche/Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jordan:Roche Diagnostics GmbH: Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Equity Ownership. Bucher:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Employment. Charoin:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Employment. Gotanda:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Employment. Shinomiya:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Employment, Patents & Royalties: (WO2018143266) A PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OR PREVENTION OF A C5-RELATED DISEASE AND A METHOD FOR TREATING OR PREVENTING A C5-RELATED DISEASE. Nagy:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Panse:Blueprint Medicines: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yoon:Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy; Kyowa Hako Kirin: Research Funding; Yuhan Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy. Peffault de Latour:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Nishimura:Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Röth:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apellis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document