scholarly journals Trial in Progress: A Phase 3 Study of Itacitinib or Placebo in Combination with Corticosteroids As Initial Treatment for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GRAVITAS-309)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3277-3277
Author(s):  
Annie Im ◽  
Rodica Morariu-Zamfir ◽  
Maureen Bleam ◽  
Ying Yan ◽  
Steven Z. Pavletic

Background Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is indicated for several hematologic malignancies and nonmalignant disorders. Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) develops in 30%-70% of long-term survivors of HCT and is a significant cause of nonrelapse mortality. Corticosteroids (CS) are the recommended first-line treatment for cGVHD; however, up to 60% of patients treated with CS require additional cGVHD therapy within 2 years. Furthermore, long-term exposure to CS is associated with a wide range of toxicities and increased risk of infection. Novel safe and effective therapies are needed to treat cGVHD and reduce CS dependence. Janus kinases (JAKs) mediate the signaling of proinflammatory cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of cGVHD. Itacitinib is a JAK-1 selective inhibitor that improved graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and survival without affecting engraftment of donor leukocytes in murine models. In a phase 1 clinical study, itacitinib 200 or 300 mg once daily (QD) was well tolerated in patients with steroid-refractory or steroid-naive acute GVHD (aGVHD). Here we describe the trial design of the first clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of itacitinib for the treatment of cGVHD. Study Design and Methods GRAVITAS-309 (NCT03584516) is a 2-part phase 3 study of itacitinib or placebo in combination with CS as initial treatment for cGVHD. Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent allogeneic HCT from any donor type and graft source, with evidence of myeloid and platelet engraftment, and who have active, moderate, or severe cGVHD per National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria are eligible to participate. Patients are excluded if they received >1 prior HCT (except autologous), had >3 days of systemic CS treatment for cGVHD, received any other systemic treatment for cGVHD, have presence of active uncontrolled infection, or had treatment with a JAK inhibitor within 8 weeks of randomization (patients who previously received a JAK inhibitor for aGVHD are eligible only if they achieved a complete or partial response). Part 1 is a randomized, open-label study to determine optimal dosing of itacitinib in combination with CS (~20 patients randomized 1:1 to itacitinib 200 mg QD or 300 mg QD; Figure 1). The primary endpoints for Part 1 are dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) through Day 28 as well as clinical safety and laboratory assessments. Main secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and efficacy outcomes (Table 1). After 20 patients have completed 28 days of treatment, an external data monitoring committee will review the data and provide a recommendation for an appropriate dose for Part 2 based on emergent adverse events, clinical laboratory parameters, PK data, and DLTs. Part 2 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study using the dose selected in Part 1 to assess the efficacy and safety of itacitinib plus CS vs placebo plus CS (~246 patients stratified by cGVHD severity and randomized 1:1; Figure 1). Patients randomized to the placebo group will be permitted to cross over to the itacitinib group after completion of the primary analysis. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (proportion of patients with complete or partial response) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints include changes in symptom scores using health-related quality-of-life measures, additional efficacy outcomes, PK parameters, and clinical safety assessments (Table 1). Exploratory biomarker analyses will evaluate the effects of JAK inhibition on circulating inflammatory cells (ie, T-cell subsets, B cells, natural killer cells, cytokines) and biomarkers of GVHD in peripheral blood after transplant. Patients will remain on study for a total of 37 months, which includes treatment period, safety follow-up, and posttreatment GVHD follow-up, unless confirmed GVHD progression, start of a new GVHD therapy, or relapse/recurrence of underlying hematologic disease occurs earlier. Efficacy analyses will be performed on the intent-to-treat population; safety analyses will be conducted on all randomized patients who receive ≥1 dose of study drug. The PK-evaluable population will include all patients who receive ≥1 dose of study drug and provide ≥1 postdose plasma PK sample. Disclosures Morariu-Zamfir: Incyte Corporation: Employment. Bleam:Incyte Corporation: Employment. Yan:Incyte Corporation: Employment.

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4561-4561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Zeiser ◽  
Andreas Burchert ◽  
Claudia Lengerke ◽  
Mareike Verbeek ◽  
Kristina Maas-Bauer ◽  
...  

Abstract We have previously reported on the efficacy of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in corticosteroid-refractory (SR) acute (a) and chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in 95 patients (pts) (Leukemia 2015;29(10):2062-8). To assess long-term follow-up results, we collected data from the same pts treated in 19 centers in Europe and the US. Pts were classified as SR-aGVHD (n=54, all grade III or IV) or SR-cGvHD (n=41, all moderate or severe). Median numbers of pre-ruxolitinib GVHD treatment lines were 3 (1-7) and 3 (1-10) for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGvHD, respectively. The median follow-up was 19 and 24 months for aGVHD and cGVHD, respectively. The 1-year overall survival (OS) from was 62.4% (CI: 49.4%-75.4%) and 92.7% (CI: 84.7%-100%) for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGvHD, respectively. The estimated median OS (50% death) was 18 months for aGVHD and not reached for cGVHD patients. The median duration of ruxolitinib treatment was 5 and 10 months for patients with SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively reflecting the different biology of the diseases. At follow-up, 22/54 (41%) of SR-aGVHD patients and 10/41 (24%) of SR-cGVHD patients have an ongoing response and are free of any immunosuppression. GVHD relapse or progression after achieved PR/CR was observed in 14/45 (31%) and 13/36 (36%) patients with SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively. Response to re-treatment with Ruxolitinib or any immunosupressive therapy was seen in 11/14 (78%) and 11/13 (86%) patients with SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively. Cytopenia (any grade) and CMV-reactivation were observed during ruxolitinib-treatment in both SR-aGVHD (30/54, 55.6% and 18/54, 33.3%) and SR-cGVHD (7/41, 17.1% and 6/41, 14.6%) patients. These findings extend our previous report by showing that patients with SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD may benefit long-term from ruxolitinib treatment with an OS that is relatively high for steroid-refractory GVHD. GVHD-relapse or GVHD-progression rates were moderate and more than 75% of the relapse/progression patients responded to re-treatment with ruxolitinib or other immunosuppression. Disclosures Meyer: Stanford University: Patents & Royalties. Marks:Pfizer: Honoraria. Lübbert:Ratiopharm: Other: Study drug valproic acid; Celgene: Other: Travel Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Other: Travel Funding, Research Funding. Scheid:Novartis: Other: funding outside this work; Celgene: Other: funding outside this work; Janssen: Other: funding outside this work. Kobbe:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Jansen: Honoraria, Other: travel support. Negrin:Stanford University: Patents & Royalties. Brune:Meda Pharma: Consultancy. Mielke:JAZZ Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy, Other: Travel grants; Gilead: Other: Travel grants; Celgene: Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau. Kuball:Gadeta B.V,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kröger:Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Peschel:MophoSys: Honoraria. von Bubnoff:BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 453-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Heilmeier ◽  
Nadine Stowasser ◽  
Gerard Socie ◽  
Maria Teresa van Lint ◽  
Andre Tichelli ◽  
...  

Abstract Patients who receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants have an increased risk for new malignancies because of several risk factors, including conditioning with radiation and chemotherapy, immune modulation, and malignant primary disease. The frequency of and risk factors for malignant neoplasm in long-term survivors should be assessed. A former analysis of the EBMT observing the 1036 patients of this study with a median observation time of 10.7 years showed older patient age and immunosuppressive treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease as main risk factors for secondary malignancies. We have tried to determine the cumulative incidence and define potential risk factors for new malignancies in long-term survivors after marrow transplantation in a retrospective multi center follow-up study. This study of the Late Effects Working Party was performed with 45 transplantation centers cooperating in the European Cooperative Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 1036 consecutive patients who underwent transplantation for leukemia, lymphoma, inborn diseases of the hematopoietic and immune systems, or severe aplastic anemia. Patients were transplanted before December 1985 and had survived more than 5 years. Reports on malignant neoplasms were evaluated, and the cumulative incidence was compared to that in the matched general population. Patient age and sex, primary disease and disease stage at transplantation, histocompatibility of the donor, conditioning regimen, type of prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease, development of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, and treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease were evaluated as variables. Univariate analysis was performed using the log rank test for the time until malignancy occurred; significant risk factors were studied in multivariate analysis (Cox regression). Median follow-up since transplantation was 17.9 years (range, 5 to 32.3 years). Malignant neoplasms were seen in 114 patients; the cumulative incidence was 4.0% at 10 years, 8.5% at 15 years, 14.0% at 20 years and 21.0% at 25 years. The rate of new malignant disease was 6-fold higher than that in an age-matched control population (P <0.001). The most frequent malignant diseases were neoplasms of the skin (23 patients), breast (16 patients), thyroid gland (13 patients), oral cavity (12 patients), uterus including cervix (7 patients), and glial tissue (3 patients). Median ages of patients and their donors at the time of transplantation were 21 years for both groups (range 0.5 – 52 years). Follow up data were avaible in 636 patients, 100 patients were deceased at the time of prior analysis, 300 patients were lost to follow up. Compared with the analysis of the same cohort of patients 10 years ago, the most striking increase in secondary malignancies was seen in breast cancer (4-fold), thyroid cancer (3-fold) and neoplasms of the skin and oral cavity (2-fold). In multivariate analysis patient age above 30 years (hazard ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 – 2.6; p=0.006), radiotherapy for conditioning (hr 2.3, CI 1.2 – 4.3; p=0.01) and immunosuppression (hr 1.5, CI 1.0 – 2.2; p=0.05) (in particular cyclosporine or methotrexate) were risk factors for new malignancies after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In conclusion longer followup shows the continuous increase of the cumulative incidence of secondary neoplasms in long-term survivors. With longer follow-up a shift in the risk factors occurs: Until 10–15 years after allogeneic transplantation immunosuppression is the major risk factor for new malignancies, whereas more than 15 years after transplantation radiotherapy becomes the dominant risk factor.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1965-1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Behnam Sadeghi ◽  
Mats Remberger ◽  
Britt Gustafsson ◽  
Jacek Winiarski ◽  
Gianluca Moretti ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. S187-S188
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Weisdorf ◽  
Madan Jagasia ◽  
Amandeep Salhotra ◽  
Carlos R. Bachier ◽  
Behyar Zoghi ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4383-4383
Author(s):  
Jonathan E. Benjamin ◽  
Ginna G. Laport ◽  
Laura J. Johnston ◽  
Sally Arai ◽  
Wen-Kai Weng ◽  
...  

Abstract Patients with high-risk hematolymphoid malignancies who relapse or who do not achieve a complete remission to induction chemotherapy generally do not achieve long-term survival when treated with the best available non-transplant therapies. The benefit of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation has been well described for patients in first complete remission, but less so for patients with advanced disease. We report the long-term follow-up of 131 patients with leukemia or lymphoma who received an HLA-matched related donor transplant following myeloablative conditioning with fractionated total body irradiation (1320cGy), etoposide (60mg/kg), and cyclophosphamide (60mg/kg). Eligibility for transplantation under this protocol included induction failure or high-risk disease that was beyond first remission. All patients were treated at a single institution. Diagnosis at the time of transplantation included ALL (n=57), AML (n=38), NHL (n=20), CML (n=10), MDS (4), JMML (n=2). Of the 95 patients with acute leukemia, 62 (65%) were not in remission at the commencement of the conditioning regimen. The median age at transplantation was 29 years (range 2–55). Seventy-four (56%) patients received unmanipulated bone marrow and the remainder received filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 8 years (range 0.3–17). The estimated five-year overall survival and event-free survival were 34% (95% confidence interval: 22–42%) and 32% (95% confidence interval: 24–39%), respectively. Leading causes of death included relapse (n=43), infection (n=11), acute graft-versus-host disease (n=8), respiratory failure (n=5) and hepatic veno-occlusive disease (n=4). Grade II–IV acute graft-versus-host disease occurred in 26% of patients. The cumulative incidence of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease among those patients who survived beyond day 100 was 32%. These results indicate that patients with high-risk or advanced disease can experience long-term disease-free survival following an aggressive conditioning regimen that combines radiotherapy, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide. Relapse remains the most significant cause of mortality, and future efforts should focus on augmenting the graft-versus-malignancy effect.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. S247
Author(s):  
Olle Ringden ◽  
Mats Remberger ◽  
Britt Gustafsson ◽  
Jacek Winiarski ◽  
Bita Khoein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document