The Clinical Relevance of Residual, Persistent and Elongated Abnormal Sized Nodes By Longest Diameter (LDi) in Patients (pts) with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Otherwise in a Complete Remission (CR)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
Jayant Narang ◽  
Surabhi Bajpai ◽  
Rudresh Rajnikant Jarecha ◽  
Christiana Caplan ◽  
Dana Macdonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Short Axis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Clinical Imaging

Background: IWCLL 2008 and 2018 criteria require that all lymph nodes/nodal masses be ≤ 15mm in longest diameter (LDi) to be consistent with a CR. Lymph nodes or nodal masses >15mm in the LDi are considered abnormal. However, it has been observed that some bulky nodes may become thin and streak-like on follow-up timepoints (Figure 1) and may be normal by clinical and imaging standards (<10mm in short axis diameter) (Cheson et al Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17:1244, 1999) however, they continue to be >15mm in LDi (LDi Positive nodes- LDi+) and, hence, categorized as abnormal per iwCLL criteria. In lymphoma studies, FDG-PET negativity is the driver of CR, and residual disease on CT scan is allowed for CR. However, in the iwCLL response assessment, LDi+ nodes may prevent a true CR. Methods: 1168 patients across multiple phase III CLL clinical trials with targeted agents were analyzed, which were independently reviewed using iwCLL 2008 and 2018 criteria. To assess the impact of LDi+ nodes, we filtered our response to finding pts who had at least one lymph node with LDi >15mm (range 15.1 to 30mm) and, thus, a PR by imaging, but all other identified nodes either resolved or <10mm in short axis and the rest of the disease burden normalized. We also evaluated clinical information on all pts (e.g., bone marrow biopsy, complete blood count (CBC), Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC), and other confounding factors, when available). Figure 1: A large right axillary node at baseline (image on left), is reduced in size and is thin, streak like (image on right) but is abnormal as per iwCLL criteria by LDi definition. Results: Of 1168 pts, 161 (13.8%) had an overall response of PR because of these abnormal LDi+ nodes on imaging per iwCLL criteria, even though the rest of the disease burden had normalized and showed CR. Laboratory data (CBC and ALC) were available in all of these 161 patients and were normalized/CR. Bone marrow was available for 31 patients and was negative/CR in all of those patients in at least one follow-up assessment by both cellularity and CLL infiltration assessments (by either morphology, flow cytometry or immuno-histochemistry (IHC)). These pts continued to have a sustained response of CR for all other parameters for multiple follow up visits with a median follow up of about 6 months. Conclusion: Based on these data, approximately 13.8 % of pts with LDi+ nodes normal by clinical/imaging standards, clinical/laboratory parameters normalized and some with a normal bone marrow evaluation, but were labeled PR in overall assessment and denied a CR. These pts likely had achieved a CR as bone marrow is considered a gold standard for normalization of disease burden. These LDi+ lymph nodes by iwCLL criteria which are normal by clinical/imaging standards, likely represent scar tissue and not active disease based on normalization of the rest of the disease. These assessments made by stringent application of iwCLL criteria in assessing lymph nodes may result in underestimating the CR rate in a clinical trial. We propose an adaptation of the iwCLL criteria to allow hematologists/oncologists to update/override the radiology overall assessment from PR to CR if all other components for the oncology review (e.g., blood counts, bone marrow, target lesions, organ assessments) meet CR criteria, based on clinical judgment. This approach is being used universally in daily clinical practice (as well as by the site investigators) when assessing CLL patients and these abnormal LDi+ nodes by iwCLL criteria, do not prevent a CR. This proposed approach may help to reduce site-central discordance in a clinical trial setting. Further studies to correlate these findings with minimal residual disease in bone marrow/blood will help validate our findings. Figure 1 Disclosures Cheson: Trillium: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jannsen: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Parexel: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Symbio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Heavy and Light Chain Monitoring in High Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM-CESAR Trial: Comparison with Conventional and Minimal Residual Disease IMWG Response Assessment

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1852-1852
Author(s):  
Noemi Puig ◽  
Teresa Contreras ◽  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
María Teresa Cedena ◽  
José J Pérez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Minimal Residual

Introduction: The GEM-CESAR trial is a potentially curative strategy for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HRsMM) patients (pts) in which the primary endpoint is the achievement of bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. However, other methods of disease evaluation in serum such as heavy+light chain (HLC) assessment, with a potential complementary value to the IMWG response criteria, have also been tested. Aim: To evaluate the performance of HLC assay in HRsMM pts at diagnosis and after consolidation, comparing the results with standard serological methods and Next Generation Flow (NGF) for the assessment of bone marrow MRD. Patients and Methods: Ninety HRsMM pts included in the GEM-CESAR trial received six 4-weeks cycles of carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone followed by high dose melphalan and 2 further cycles of consolidation with the same regimen. All pts received maintenance treatment with lenalidomide for up to 2 years. SPEP and IFE were performed using standard procedures. Serum IgGk, IgGl, IgAk and IgAl HLC concentrations were measured using Hevylite (The Binding Site Group Ltd, Birmingham, UK) on a SPA PLUS turbidimeter. HLC concentrations and ratios were considered abnormal if they were outside the 95% reference ranges provided by the manufacturer. MRD was analyzed by flow cytometry following EuroFlow recommendations (sensitivity, 2x10-6). Standard response assignment was carried out as per the IMWG guidelines. Hevylite responses were assigned and HLC-pair suppression was defined as in Michalet et al (Leukemia 2018). Results: Out of 90 HRsMM pts, 75 had monoclonal intact immunoglobulin and samples available at diagnosis (50 IgG and 25 IgA). HLC ratio was abnormal in 98% of IgG pts and in 100% of IgA pts. Response assessment by Hevylite and standard IMWG criteria were available in 62 pts post-consolidation (Table 1). A good agreement was found between the two methods (kappa quadratic weighting = 0,6327 (0,4016 - 0,8638)). Among 46 pts with assigned CR as per the IMWG response criteria, there were 3 and 8 pts in PR and VGPR according to the Hevylite method, respectively. In 62 cases, paired Hevylite and MRD assessment data were available. Concordant results were found in 72.5% of cases (45/62; HLC+/NGF+ in 15 and HLC-/NGF- in 30 cases) while in the remaining 27.4% of cases results were discordant (17/62; HLC-/NGF+ in 6 and HLC+/NGF- in 11 cases). Post-consolidation, 24, 25.8 and 42.3% of the 62 samples were positive by SPEP, NGF and Hevylite, respectively. HLC-pair suppression was identified in 13/62 pts; 10 had severe HLC-pair suppression at the end of consolidation. After a median follow-up of 32 months (8-128), 93% of pts remain alive and progression-free. Three patients that have already progressed had their responses assessed post-consolidation. The first pt was assigned VGPR by the standard IMWG criteria and PR by Hevylite and was MRD positive by NGF; the second pt was assigned CR by IMWG criteria and Hevylite but had severe HLC-pair immunosuppression and was MRD positive by NGF; the third pt was in CR by IMWG and HLC criteria and was MRD positive by MFC. Conclusions: Moderate agreement was found between response assessment by Hevylite and the standard IMWG methods as well as between Hevylite and MRD assessment by NGF. Most discordances were a result of Hevylite detecting disease in samples negative by the standard methods, but longer follow-up is needed to ascertain its clinical value. HLC assessment could have anticipated the progression noted in 2 (out of 3) patients. Disclosures Puig: Takeda, Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; The Binding Site: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Paiva:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi and Takeda: Consultancy. Rodriguez Otero:Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy. Oriol:Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, Jansse: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rios:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alegre:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. de la Rubia:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. De Arriba:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Ocio:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bladé:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Irctures: Honoraria. Mateos:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmamar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; EDO: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Long-Term Survival in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Who Achieved Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Response Following Anti-CD19 BiTE® Blinatumomab

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2287-2287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Zugmaier ◽  
Nicola Goekbuget ◽  
Andreas Viardot ◽  
Matthias Stelljes ◽  
Svenja Neumann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-precursor ALL in adults has an unfavorable prognosis with a median overall survival of 4–8 months and a 5-year survival of <10%. Long-term follow-up data are presented from an exploratory phase 2 study with blinatumomab, an investigational bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct that directs cytotoxic T-cells to CD19-expressing target cells (Topp MS et al. Blood 2012;120(21):670). Methods: The primary endpoint was hematologic complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh*) within 2 cycles of blinatumomab. Secondary endpoints included rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) response (defined as < 10-4), overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS). Blinatumomab was administered by continuous intravenous infusion for 28 days followed by a 14-day treatment-free interval. Responding patients had the option to receive 3 additional cycles of treatment or to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). Results: 36 patients were treated; 25 (69%) responded, with 15 (42%) achieving CR and 10 (28%) CRh*. MRD response was achieved in 22 (88%) of these 25 patients with CR or CRh*. Thirteen patients with CR or CRh* proceeded to aHSCT after blinatumomab treatment. In addition, one patient with hypocellular bone marrow and MRD response after the first cycle underwent aHSCT. Follow-up for RFS is 22.4 months; median RFS is 8.8 months. Median follow-up for OS is 30.2 months; median OS is 12.9 months. Ten patients (28%) are alive at 29.7 months (Figure). We analyzed the characteristics of the 10 living long-term survivors, defined as OS of 2 years or longer, seven of whom were relapse-free. The age of these 10 patients at the time of first infusion ranged from 21 to 72 years; the blast count at screening ranged from 8% to 97% (median, 56%). Four of the 10 patients alive had received aHSCT prior to blinatumomab treatment. Of the six patients without a prior aHSCT, two were primary refractory; two had the first relapse within 12 months and two after 12 months post first diagnosis. In the 10 surviving patients blinatumomab treatment induced CR in seven patients, CRh* in two patients, and blast-free hypo-cellular bone marrow in one patient. All 10 surviving patients had an MRD response following blinatumomab treatment. The patient with hypocellular bone marrow received a transplant after the first cycle before potential recovery of blood counts qualifying for CR/CRh* could occur. Seven of the surviving patients underwent aHSCT after blinatumomab, including four patients who received a second aHSCT after they had already received an aHSCT prior to blinatumomab. One of the three patients who did not undergo aHSCT after CRh* had grade 4 cytokine release syndrome requiring resuscitation after 1 day of blinatumomab treatment and has remained in ongoing remission for 22 months without any further treatment aside from 5 cycles of blinatumomab. Another one of these three patients, who had a grade 3 neurologic event on day 2 of cycle 2, has remained in ongoing remission for 34 months without any further treatment aside from 5 cycles of blinatumomab. The third of these three patients had two CD19-positive relapses after CR following blinatumomab treatment. The patient was retreated with 3 cycles of blinatumomab, resulting twice in CR and MRD response. Two of the 10 surviving patients relapsed after blinatumomab and aHSCT; one patient with a CD 19-negative relapse achieved another hematologic remission by chemotherapy. Summary: These data show that patients with r/r ALL, who achieved MRD response and received subsequent aHSCT following blinatumomab immunotherapy may achieve long-term survival longer than 2 years. Studies with a larger sample size are warranted to confirm these data. Two patients with grade 3 or 4 toxicities showed long-term survival without aHSCT after blinatumomab. Figure Figure. Disclosures Zugmaier: Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership; Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment. Off Label Use: This presentation will discuss the off-label use of blinatumomab, as this agent is not approved for use by the FDA, EMA or any other regulatory authorities.. Goekbuget:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Viardot:Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel support Other; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel support, Travel support Other; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Travel support Other. Horst:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Brueggemann:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Holland:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schmidt:Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership; Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment. Mergen:Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership; Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment. Bargou:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Topp:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Prospective, Multicenter Study of the MTOR Inhibitor Everolimus (RAD001) As Primary Therapy in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2951-2951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P Treon ◽  
Christina K Tripsas ◽  
Leukothea Ioakimidis ◽  
Diane Warren ◽  
Christopher Patterson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Bone Marrow Disease ◽  
Unacceptable Toxicity

Abstract Abstract 2951 Introduction: Everolimus (RAD001) is an inhibitor of MTORC1, a component of the Akt-MTOR pathway which regulates growth and survival of lymphoplasmacytic cells in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM). Everolimus also exhibits activity in WM patients with relapsed/refractory disease (Ghobrial et al, JCO 2010; 28 :1408–14). We therefore initiated this multicenter, prospective study to delineate the efficacy and tolerability of Everolimus as primary therapy in WM. Patients and Methods: WM patients with symptomatic disease, adequate organ function, who were not previously treated, and who did not have symptomatic hyperviscosity were eligible for this study. Intended therapy consisted of 10 mg of oral Everolimus administered daily, with sequential dose de-escalation to 7.5 mg daily, 5 mg daily, and 5 mg every other day permitted for toxicity. Patients were treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were encouraged to use 5 mL of an oral dexamethasone solution (0.5 mg/5mL) to swish and spit up to 4 times daily for prevention of oral ulcerations associated with Everolimus. Study participants were assessed monthly for the first 3 months, and thereafter every 3 months which included a physical examination, complete blood counts, chemistries, and serum IgM monitoring. Bone marrow biopsies and aspirations were performed at baseline, at months 6 and 12, and as required for response assessment. Results: Thirty-three patients were enrolled on this prospective, multicenter study and are evaluable for response. Median baseline characteristics for all patients are as follows: Age 62 (range 41–80 years); Hematocrit 31.3% (range 24.5–45.7%); Hemoglobin 10.8 (range 7.8–15.7 g/dL); serum IgM 4, 440 (range 959–10, 256 mg/dL), with 23 (69.7%) patients demonstrating an IgM level ≥3, 000 mg/dL; serum M-protein 2.60 g/dL (range 0.31–5.31 g/dL), B2M 3.0 mg/L (1.6–6.7 mg/L). The median baseline bone marrow disease burden was 70% (range 7.5–95%), and 21 patients (63.6%) demonstrated adenopathy or splenomegaly by CT scans at baseline. At best response, serum IgM levels declined from 4, 440 to 1, 925 (p<0.0001), and serum M-protein decreased from 2.60 to 1.50 g/dL (p<0.0001). The median time to best serum IgM response was 3 months (range 0.6–15 months). Median hematocrit and hemoglobin levels declined modestly from 31.3% to 30.6% (p=0.057) and 10.8 to 10.4 g/dL (p= 0.1059), respectively. Twenty-two patients are evaluable for response by both bone marrow biopsy and IgM level at 6 months, at which time bone marrow disease burden remained unchanged with a median of 65% involvement (range 10–95%; p=0.3595). The best overall response rate utilizing consensus criteria was 66.7% (14 Partial Responses, 8 Minor Responses, and 11 Stable Disease), for a major response rate of 42.4%. However, discordance between serum IgM levels upon which consensus criteria for response are based, and bone marrow disease response were common and complicated response assessment. At 6 month assessments, 10 of 22 (45.5%) patients for whom both serum IgM and bone marrow assessments were performed, discordance between serum IgM levels and bone marrow disease involvement were observed. Among these patients, 2 had no change, and 8 had increased bone marrow disease involvement despite decreases in serum IgM levels. Grade ≥2 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities possibly, probably or definitively associated with Everolimus included anemia (n=8, 24%), thrombocytopenia (n=5, 15%), neutropenia (n=5, 15%), hyperglycemia (n=2, 6%), oral ulcerations (n=7, 21%), pneumonitis (n=5, 15%), fatigue (n=4, 12%), rash (n=2, 6%), and cellulitis (n=2, 6%). With a median follow-up of 9 months (range 0–18 months), 15 patients remain on study. Reasons for study discontinuation included non-response or disease progression (n=11), unacceptable toxicity (n=6, including 5 for pneumonitis and 1 for neutropenia), and loss of follow-up (n=1). Conclusions: Everolimus is active in the primary therapy of WM, with rapid reductions observed in serum IgM levels in most patients. Serum IgM discordance to underlying bone marrow disease burden is common, and serial bone marrow assessments are important for response monitoring in WM patients receiving Everolimus. Disclosures: Treon: Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria. Eradat:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Genentech, A Roche Company: Speakers Bureau. Matous:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Anderson:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Equity Ownership. Ghobrial:Noxxon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Venetoclax and Azacitidine for Older Newly Diagnosed Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Institution Pilot Study Using Measurable Residual Disease to Guide Therapy

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2638-2638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Winters ◽  
Jonathan A Gutman ◽  
Enkhtsetseg Purev ◽  
Brett M. Stevens ◽  
Shanshan Pei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Ras Pathway ◽  
Measurable Residual Disease ◽  
Count Recovery

Background: Venetoclax (ven) was approved for older untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients due to high response rates and durable remissions. As a participating site in the dose escalation study, we observed deeper/more durable responses in some who received >400mg ven. We also noted 16/33 discontinued azacitidine (aza) after achieving a response; 9 relapsed and 7 remained in long term remission on ven only. Based on these observations, we designed a study that hypothesized: A)Higher initial doses of ven would allow deeper/more durable responses, and B)Multi modality high sensitivity measurable residual disease (MRD) testing could identify patients able to discontinue aza and remain on maintenance ven. Methods: This is an ongoing phase 2 study (NCT03466294) of 42 untreated AML patients ≥60 who decline/are ineligible for induction. Patients have adequate organ function and white blood cell counts <25x109/L (hydrea permitted). In cycle 1, patients receive aza 75mg/m2 on days (d) 1-7 and ven, escalated from 100 to 200 to 400 to 600mg on d 1-4. Ven continues at 600mg d 5-28 and bone marrow biopsies (BMBXs) are performed on d 8 and 28. Patients who achieve morphologic remission without count recovery have up to 14 days off therapy before subsequent cycles, with growth factor support; "upgraded" responses are recorded if count recovery occurs. Non responders discontinue or receive up to two additional cycles of aza and ven 600mg. Responders who remain MRD+ by multiparameter flow cytometry (MPFC, Hematologics) and/or digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for as many identifiable diagnostic genes as possible also receive up to 2 additional cycles of aza and ven 600mg. MRD+ responders after 3 cycles continue aza and ven 400mg until toxicity/progression. Patients who experience MRD- responses at any time stop aza and continue ven 400mg daily (Fig 1). Results: 30 patients enrolled between May 2018 and July 2019; median age is 71 (60-88), 10% evolved from MDS and 10% and 73% had intermediate and unfavorable risk disease by ELN, respectively (Table 1). 732 adverse events (AEs) occurred; 46 (6%) were serious, the most common were neutropenic fever (37%) and pneumonia (13%). The most common >grade 2 related AEs were leukopenia (53%), thrombocytopenia (44%) and neutropenia (35%); there were no related grade 5 AEs. The overall response rate was 70% (21/30; CR=19, MLFS=2). Median number of cycles to achieve best response was 1. Significant blast reductions were seen on day 8; of the 28 with interpretable day 8 BMBXs, 10 achieved MLFS on day 8. 4 completed ≥1 cycle and were refractory. An additional 4 did not complete cycle 1: 1 died of disease and 3 elected to come off therapy (all subsequently died of disease). Four (19%) responders relapsed, after a median 180 days (27-279). With median follow up of 214 days, median response duration has not been reached. 10 patients died, after a median 65 days (29-256); 1/30 died within 30 days. Median overall survival has not been reached. Of the 26 who completed ≥1 cycle, 19 were MRD- by MPFC, including 18/19 who achieved CR. Of these 26, 3 were not monitored by ddPCR: for 2 patients this was due to the absence of detectable baseline mutations and for 1 patient it was due to refractory disease. The remaining 23 had ddPCR monitoring; 3 became MRD- by this modality (Fig 2). All 3 were also MRD- by MPFC and per protocol discontinued aza and initiated ven maintenance (Fig 1). MRD negativity by both parameters occurred after cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively. One MRD- patient relapsed after 216 days; two remain in remission after 301 and 124 days. An additional 4 who achieved MRD+ responses discontinued aza at their insistence (and in violation of the protocol); 1 relapsed after 279 days, and 3 remain in ongoing remission. Univariate predictors of refractory disease were FAB M0/M1 (OR 0.070, p=0.02) and RAS pathway mutations (OR 14.25, p=0.02). Conclusions: Higher initial doses of ven are tolerated in this population. Blast reduction occurs quickly in many patients (day 8), for this low intensity regimen. Response rates are consistent with lower doses of ven. Very deep responses, as measured by highly sensitive MRD methods (MPFC and ddPCR are capable of sensitivity up to 0.02%), are attainable. Longer follow up time will determine if higher ven doses and MRD-driven decisions related to continuation of aza result in more durable responses. Increased maturation of blasts and RAS pathway mutations are predictors for refractory disease. Disclosures Lyle: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pollyea:Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celyad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Diachii Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Minimal Residual Disease Eradication with Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 12-14
Author(s):  
Alexander Coltoff ◽  
Joseph G. Jurcic ◽  
Peter Campbell ◽  
Daniel J. Lee ◽  
Mark L Heaney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Institutional Research ◽  
Negative Group ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Research Grants

Introduction The combination of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax with an HMA (HMA/Ven) has improved outcomes in previously untreated patients with AML not eligible for intensive induction therapy. In a phase Ib study, 67% of patients achieved a complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete recovery of blood counts (CRi) with a median overall survival (OS) of 17.5 months (DiNardo CD et al. Blood 2019; 133(1):7-17). HMA/Ven has also demonstrated efficacy in a heavily pretreated population with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML, the majority of whom had prior HMA exposure (DiNardo CD et al. Am J Hematol 2018; 93(3):401-7). Measurable residual disease (MRD) is recognized as an independent prognostic indicator important for risk stratification and treatment planning (Schuurhuis GJ et al. Blood 2018; 131(12):1275-91). To date, however, there have been few reports on the effect of HMA/Ven on MRD. Methods This is a retrospective case series of patients with AML at a single-center tertiary-care institution. Patients ≥ 18 years of age who were treated with HMA/Ven between January 2017 and June 2020, either in the upfront or salvage setting, for AML were included. Outcomes included CR/CRi rate, MRD response, relapse free survival (RFS), and OS. MRD was assessed via multicolor flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 10-3 (0.1%). Results Nineteen patients were identified, 12 (63%) of whom were female. The median age at the time of HMA/Ven initiation was 71 years (range, 21 - 87 years). Ten (53%) patients had de novo AML and 9 had secondary or therapy-related AML. By 2017 ELN criteria, 3 (16%) patients had favorable-risk, 9 (47%) had intermediate-risk, and 7 (37%) had adverse-risk AML. Nine (47%) patients had R/R AML; 5 received HMA/Ven as first salvage therapy, and 4 as 2nd or greater salvage. Three (16%) patients had prior HMA exposure. No patient had prior venetoclax exposure. Median follow-up was 9.1 months (range, 1-21.1 months). Ten (53%) patients received azacitidine and 9 (47%) were given decitabine. Venetoclax doses ranged from 50 to 400 mg daily, depending on participation in a clinical trial and concomitant medications. Eight patients achieved a CR and 7 patients achieved a CRi for a combined CR/CRi rate of 79%. The CR/CRi rate was 90% (9/10) in the upfront setting, and 66% (6/9) in the salvage setting. The median time and number of cycles to best clinical response was 2.3 months (range, 0.9-3.9 months) and 2 (range, 1-3 cycles), respectively. Eleven (73%) of the 15 responders achieved MRD clearance after a median of 2 cycles (range, 1-3 cycles) (Table 1). Two of 4 (50%) MRD-positive patients relapsed, while 4 (36%) of 11 MRD-negative patients relapsed (Figure 1). Relapse occurred at a median of 2.0 months (range, 1.3-2.7 months) in the MRD positive group and 11.0 months (range, 2.8-14 months) in the MRD negative group. One patient died of infectious complications while MRD negative. Three patients, all of whom were treated for R/R disease, proceeded to an allogeneic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Two were MRD negative at the time of HSCT and all remained in remission. At the time of data cutoff, 7 (64%) of 11 MRD-negative patients were alive, and all 4 MRD-positive patients were alive. Causes of death in the MRD-negative group included disease relapse (3 patients) and infection (1 patient). Median overall survival in the entire cohort (range, 32 days-NR) was not reached. Conclusions HMA/Ven was highly effective as both upfront and salvage therapy. Surprisingly, the salvage CR/CRi rate in this series was 66%, allowing half of the responders to proceed to HSCT. The majority (73%) of responders achieved MRD negativity. While MRD status influenced RFS, 36% of MRD-negative patients relapsed. Additionally, the same percentage of MRD-negative patients died during follow-up, versus none of the patients with MRD-positivity. This indicates the need for more sensitive methods to assess MRD and for novel therapeutic strategies to eliminate MRD, thereby improving long-term outcomes. Larger prospective studies are needed to define the role of MRD assessment with venetoclax-containing regimens. Disclosures Jurcic: AbbVie:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Celgene:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Syros Pharmaceuticals:Research Funding;PTC Therapeutics:Research Funding;Arog Pharmaceuticals:Research Funding;Kura Oncology:Research Funding;Forma Therapeutics:Research Funding;Astellas:Research Funding;Genentech:Research Funding;Novartis:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Daiichi-Sankyo:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;BMS:Consultancy, Research Funding.Campbell:AstraZeneca:Consultancy.Lee:Genentech:Research Funding;Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, Inc.:Research Funding;AbbVie:Research Funding;Novartis:Research Funding;Bayer:Research Funding;Celgene:Consultancy;Forty Seven:Research Funding.Heaney:Blueprint Medicines Corporation:Research Funding;BMS:Research Funding;CTI Biopharma:Consultancy, Research Funding;Deciphera:Research Funding;Incyte:Research Funding;Novartis:Consultancy, Research Funding;Sierra Oncology:Research Funding;AbbVie:Consultancy;Partner Therapeutics:Consultancy.Lamanna:Janssen:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Octapharma:Research Funding;Juno:Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Gilead:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Astra Zeneca:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Pharmacyclics:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Genentech:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Bei-Gene:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Abbvie:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Oncternal, Verastem, TG Therapeutics:Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;MingSight:Other: Institutional research grants, Research Funding;Loxo:Research Funding;Celgene:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Columbia University Medical Center:Current Employment.

LONG-TERM RESULTS of the GIMEMA VTD Consolidation TRIAL In Autografted MULTIPLE Myeloma PATIENTS (VEL-03-096): IMPACT of Minimal RESIDUAL DISEASE Detection by REAL Time Quantitative PCR On LATE Recurrences and Overall SURVIVAL

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 827-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Ladetto ◽  
Simone Ferrero ◽  
Daniela Drandi ◽  
Federica Cavallo ◽  
Luigia Monitillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clin Oncol ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Clinical Relapse ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Tumor Load

Abstract Abstract 827 Background and aims: We have recently shown that a consolidation therapy with bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTD) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients responding to autologous transplantation (ASCT) induces major tumor shrinking assessed by real time-quantitative (RQ)-PCR. Moreover we found that low levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) associated to a better progression-free survival (PFS) [GIMEMA VEL-03-096 trial, EudraCT Number 2004-000531-28: Ladetto et al, J Clin Oncol 2010]. We here present the updated results of this study at a median follow-up of 65 months. In the present analysis the following additional issues have been addressed: a) impact of MRD on PFS over time, with special interest to the role of MRD kinetics on outcome; b) impact of MRD on overall survival (OS). Patients and methods: Inclusion criteria and treatment schedule for this study have been already reported [Ladetto et al., J Clin Oncol 2010] and included: 1) a documented complete or very good partial remission following ASCT delivered as first line treatment; 2) no previous therapy with thalidomide or bortezomib; 3) presence of a molecular marker based on the immunoglobulin heavy chain rearrangement (IGH). MRD was assessed on bone marrow samples at diagnosis, study entry, after two VTD courses, at the end of treatment and then at six months intervals, up to clinical relapse. Patients underwent MRD detection using either qualitative nested PCR and RQ-PCR, employing IGH-derived patient specific primers as already described [Voena et al., Leukemia 1997; Ladetto et al., Biol Bone Marrow Transpl 2000]. For outcome analysis patients were grouped according to following definitions: a) MRD negativity on two consecutive samples by the most sensitive PCR method (nested PCR): full molecular remission (FMR); b) MRD negativity on two consecutive samples by RQ-PCR (less sensitive but currently better standardized, according to European Study Group on MRD detection guidelines [van der Vendel et al., Leukemia 2007]): standard molecular remission (SMR); c) post-treatment tumor load above the median by RQ-PCR: high tumor burden (HTB); d) post-treatment tumor load below the median by RQ-PCR: low tumor burden (LTB); e) recurrence of detectable MRD after FMR/SMR: molecular relapse (M-rel); f) increase of MRD levels of at least one log: active disease (AD). Results: Feasibility, toxicity and clinical outcome of the trial have been already reported [Ladetto et al., J Clin Oncol 2010]. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and median clinical follow-up from start of first line treatment is 65 months. 270 of the planned samples for MRD monitoring (86%) were actually received by the centralized lab. So far 17 relapses and six deaths have been reported. Following VTD consolidation, 7/38 evaluable patients achieved FMR (18%) and 15/38 achieved SMR (39%). Three M-rel were observed, two of them followed by clinical relapse within six months. Achievement of SMR proved highly predictive for PFS (5-years (y) PFS 82% vs 44%, p=0.009, figure 1A), as well as the presence of HTB and AD (5-y PFS 35% vs 87%, p<0.001, figure 2). Interestingly, patients with LTB and no evidence of M-rel or AD had an excellent outcome with a 5-y PFS of 87%, (even considering that molecular follow-up was incomplete due to lack of samples in the two events observed in the low risk group, figure 2). Most notably, none of the patients achieving FMR or SMR has so far died and both SMR and AD proved to be significant predictors for OS (respectively, 5y-OS 100% vs 74%, p=0.012, figure 1B, and 5y-OS 86% vs 100%, p=0.037, data not shown). Conclusions: Our long-term results indicate that: 1) the achievement of SMR following VTD consolidation in MM patients is associated with a better outcome in terms of PFS and OS; 2) a dynamic increase in molecular tumor burden (AD), detectable by RQ-PCR, predicts late disease relapses several months before clinical recurrence. Taken together these results suggest the importance of developing tailored treatment for patients with high residual burden or showing increasing levels of MRD during follow-up, as already pursued for example in mantle cell lymphoma [Andersen et al., J Clin Oncol 2009]. Disclosures: Ladetto: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Italfarmaco: Research Funding. Cavallo:celgene: Honoraria. Guglielmelli:celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Palumbo:Merck: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria.

Switching to Nilotinib Is Associated with Continued Deeper Molecular Responses in CML-CP Patients with Minimal Residual Disease After ≥ 2 Years On Imatinib: Enestcmr 2-Year Follow-up Results

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 694-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽  
Nelson Spector ◽  
Brian Leber ◽  
Ricardo Pasquini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 694 Background: Superior rates of deeper molecular responses were achieved with nilotinib vs imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials—newly diagnosed patients (ENESTnd) trial. In addition, the 12-month (mo) analysis of the ENEST—complete molecular response (ENESTcmr) study demonstrated that switching to nilotinib after a minimum of 2 years on imatinib led to increased rates of major molecular response (MMR) and deeper molecular responses vs remaining on imatinib. Results from ENESTcmr are presented here with minimum 24 mo of patient follow-up. Methods: Patients with Ph+ CML-CP who had achieved complete cytogenetic responses but still had persistent BCR-ABL positivity by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) after ≥ 2 years on imatinib were eligible. Patients (n = 207) were randomized to switch to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 104) or to continue on the same dose of imatinib (400 or 600 mg once daily [QD]; n = 103). Rates of MMR, MR4 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.01% according to the International Scale [IS], corresponding to a 4-log reduction), MR4.5 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.0032%IS, corresponding to 4.5-log reduction), and undetectable BCR-ABL via RQ-PCR with ≥ 4.5-log sensitivity were measured. Results: Among all randomized patients (intent-to-treat population), significantly more patients treated with nilotinib continued to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo (32.7% on nilotinib vs 16.5% on imatinib; P =.005; Table).The difference between the arms in achievement of this endpoint increased between 1 and 2 years (from 12.4% to 16.2%). The median time to MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL was also significantly faster on nilotinib than on imatinib (P = .005 and .003, respectively). Cumulative rates of MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL continued to be higher with nilotinib in patients without those responses at baseline, and the difference between arms appeared to increase over time. The safety profiles for nilotinib and imatinib were consistent with prior studies. By 24 mo, no patients in either arm progressed to accelerated phase/blast crisis. No patients on nilotinib died since the 12-mo analysis; 1 patient on imatinib died from metastatic prostate cancer in follow-up after discontinuation from the study. Conclusions: Switching to nilotinib led to significantly faster, deeper molecular responses in patients with minimal residual disease on long-term imatinib therapy. Since the 12-mo analysis, rates of deep molecular response (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) have remained significantly higher in patients who did not have the response at baseline and were switched to nilotinib (vs those remaining on imatinib). In fact, the difference in favor of nilotinib increased between 1 and 2 years. These results suggest that switching to the more potent, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib is beneficial in patients with minimal residual disease after long-term imatinib therapy. Achievement of these deeper molecular responses (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) after switching to nilotinib may enable a greater proportion of CML-CP patients to be eligible for future discontinuation studies. Cumulative rates of confirmed undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo will be presented as the confirmation assessments for several responders were not available at the time of this analysis. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; CSL: Research Funding. Lipton:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Spector:Novarits: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Leber:Novartis: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Schwarer:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Etienne:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Purkayastha:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Collins:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Szczudlo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Cervantes:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Observational Prospective Registry for the Assessment of the Clinical Impact of Starting Anti-Myeloma Treatment at Biological Relapse

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4765-4765
Author(s):  
Adrian Alegre ◽  
Merche Gironella ◽  
Juan Miguel Bergua ◽  
Esther Gonzalez ◽  
Fernando Escalante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Clinical Relapse ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Despite the great medical advances associated with the introduction of thalidomide, bortezomib (BORT), and lenalidomide (LEN) for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), it remains an incurable disease. Most patients (pts) show disease progression, consistent with the clinical evolution of MM, and only a low percentage achieve long-term responses and extended progression-free survival (PFS). The heterogeneous nature of MM in both the clinical and biological setting is reflected in the heterogeneity of MM relapses. The International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel (Rajkumar, Blood 2011) states that treatment (Tx) shall begin either at clinical relapse with symptoms (clinR), or in the event of asymptomatic relapse with significant paraprotein relapse, biological relapse (BR). The purpose of this Spanish registry is to describe MM relapse patterns comparing the impact of Tx decisions in pts who meet the criteria for biological relapse (BR) according to IMWG criteria with those in whom Tx was delayed until clinical relapse (clinR). Here, the preliminary results of this study are presented. Methods: MM pts in (or previous to) first or second BR who have achieved ≥ PR since their last Tx are eligible for inclusion in this observational prospective registry at the time BR is detected. Evaluations performed at least bi-monthly are mandatory. A total of 41 Spanish sites participated in the registry following approval from their independent ethics committees, with 410 pts expected to be included, without physician’s decision of prescribing Tx affecting the inclusion. The main objective of the registry is to assess the time to progression (TTP) from the start of anti-MM Tx at the onset of asymptomatic BR vs. the start of Tx at the time of clinR. Secondary objectives are to describe demographics of BR; to assess the median time elapsing from BR to clinR; to assess overall response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), PFS, overall survival (OS) at BR and at clinR (if appropriate); to asses safety and quality of life (QoL) using 2 validated questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY24); to document the tolerability profile of the Tx; and to describe the use of associated resources. Here, we summarize baseline characteristics and preliminary results from 83 pts (out of 126 registered pts) who had basal data in the registry at the time of this report. Results: Overall, 79% of pts presented with a BR and 21% were in a bi-monthly watchful waiting follow up. The mean age of pts was 67 years, 53% were female, 57% were in first relapse, 43% and 27% had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 and 1, respectively, while the ECOG PS was unknown in 30% of pts at the time of this report. In total, 30% of pts had ISS stage I, 26% had ISS stage II, and 22% had ISS stage III, while ISS stage data were not available or unknown for 12% and 10% of pts, respectively. MM types were IgG Κ (37% of pts), IgG λ (23%), IgA Κ (13%), IgA λ (9%), and type was unknown in 17% of pts. 28% of IgG/IgA MM types were Bence-Jones. Cytogenetic risk assessments were available in 66% of pts. Among those pts with a BR, 51% received active Tx without waiting for a ClinR. First-line Tx was BORT-based in 70% of pts. Overall, 55% of pts had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation, 15% had received consolidation Tx and 34% had received maintenance Tx. After first-line Tx, 17% of pts achieved a stringent complete response (sCR), 31% achieved a CR, 24% achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), and 10% achieved a PR. The median time to BR was 24.53 months. Most (63%) pts who registered after second relapse received LEN-based Tx. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study in MM to evaluate BR as well as the effects of Tx based on the decision to start Tx at BR vs. clinR. In this preliminary cohort, the physicians’ decision to start active Tx at BR, before the onset of clinR in 50% of cases, was noteworthy. Further follow-up is needed to identify the differences between these two strategies. Updated clinical results will be presented at the meeting. MM-BR Study, Spanish Myeloma Group-GEM/PETHEMA Bibliography Alegre A, et al. Haematologica. 2002;87:609-14. Brioli A, et al. Blood. 2014;123:3414-9. Fernández de Larrea C, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49:223-7. Lenhoff S, et al. Haematologica. 2006;91:1228-33. Rajkumar SV, et al. Blood. 2011;117:4691-5. Zamarin D, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:419-24. Disclosures Alegre: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lahuerta:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ruiz:Celgene: Celgene Stock options as part of the employee's compensation plan Other, Employment. Vilanova:Celgene: Contracted by Celgene Other.

scholarly journals Next-Generation Sequencing to Assess the Impact of Low Dose Melphalan on Residual Disease before High-Dose Melphalan and Stem Cell Transplant in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4933-4933
Author(s):  
Ehsan Malek ◽  
Mary Hislop ◽  
Leland Metheny ◽  
Molly Gallogly ◽  
Marcos J.G. de Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Size Estimation ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract High-Dose Melphalan (HDM) followed by stem cell transplant (SCT) remains the standard-of-care for transplant-eligible patients newly-diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM). However, ~1/3 of patients relapse &lt;2 years after undergoing HDM-SCT, indicating that melphalan-sensitivity is limited to a subset of patients and is currently not predictable. Currently, models that predict melphalan-resistance before proceeding to transplant are lacking. Rather, transplant-eligibility is defined mostly based on adequate organ function and performance status. Therefore, there is an urgent and unmet clinical need to develop strategies that accurately predict melphalan sensitivity among MM patients prior to HDM-SCT and save melphalan-resistant patients from undergoing this highly morbid procedure, if no demonstrable benefit is expected from it. Traditional disease-measurement methods based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria rely on the secretory function of myeloma cells and measure monoclonal protein levels. Following induction therapy, pre-transplant monoclonal protein levels are usually very low, and further reduction in myeloma secretory function are not detectable. In addition, the long half-life of monoclonal proteins makes assessing short-term disease changes problematic. Methods to accurately detect minor changes in disease burden following a low dose of melphalan (LDM) as a marker of melphalan sensitivity are needed to better predict patient responses to LDM. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), is an alternative approach that may allow for the highly sensitive, rapid, real-time detection of minuscule changes in tumor volume that are not influenced by the long half-life of monoclonal proteins. Here, we propose to use NGS-based tumor assessment to evaluate changes in disease volume following LDM before proceeding to HDM-SCT. Evidence is lacking to determine whether a single LDM generates a decrease in myeloma burden that is measurable by NGS. Our central hypothesis is that NGS of bone marrow aspirates from newly-diagnosed, post-induction transplant-eligible MM patients will provide a method to precisely determine the effect of LDM on disease burden. ClonoSEQ assay is an FDA-cleared, highly sensitive, specific, and standardized method to detect and monitor MRD, in MM patients. clonoSEQ leverages the power of NGS and offers an accurate and reliable way to assess how disease burden changes over time in response to treatment. Therefore, we propose a proof-of-principle study to assess the validity of this strategy and to provide essential data for future trial design investigating individualized approaches based on NGS sequencing and low doses of therapeutic agents. We will test the central hypothesis that LDM, administered at 16 mg/m 2, generates a detectable reduction in tumor burden measured by NGS. A detectable reduction in tumor burden is defined as a ≥ 20% decrease in NGS clonal count in at least 30% of subjects. We will administer propylene glycol-free melphalan formulation (EVOMELA) due to greater stability upon reconstitution than AlKERAN formulation in order to diminish the variability in the effective administered dose. The primary and secondary objectives and endpoints of the study are listed in Table-1,2. Statistical Considerations: Clonoseq detects measurable residual disease at the level of a single cell given sufficient sample input. The specific hypothesis of this pilot trial is LDM produces a measurable disease reduction that is readily detectable by clonoSEQ with at least a 20% reduction in at least 30% of patients. Assuming a 100% yield for VJD clonal sequencing and calibration efficacy by clonoSEQ, the sample size required to test the null hypothesis of 5% patients with positive MRD test against alternative 30% patients with positive MRD test is 16 patients. The sample size estimation is using two-sided chi-square test with 80% power. The sample size estimation is n = 21, when power = 90% based on one sample Binomial distribution theory. We will assume 20% failure rate for VJD clonal sequencing and calibration efficacy by clonoSEQ. Therefore, by enrolling 20 patients, we expect that at least 16 patients will have MRD assessable by NGS method. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Malek: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Bluespark Inc.: Research Funding; Sanofi: Other: Advisory Board; Cumberland Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Other: Advisory board ; Medpacto Inc.: Research Funding. Metheny: Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacosmos: Honoraria. de Lima: Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Potential Impact of Consolidation Radiation Therapy for Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Secondary Modeling of SWOG S0816 with Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2927-2927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chul S. Ha ◽  
Hongli Li ◽  
Heiko Schoder ◽  
Chelsea C Pinnix ◽  
Elizabeth Brem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Entire Group ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
Receiver Operating

Abstract Background:The role of radiation therapy (XRT) for advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is controversial. In the HD15 trial, the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) administered XRT for PET-positive residual disease ≥2.5 cm at least 2 weeks after completion of chemotherapy and showed 91.5 % in-field control rate with a median follow-up of 102 months (Engert, A; personal communication). However, there is no comparison arm where patients with PET-positive residual disease ≥2.5 cm did not receive XRT. SWOG S0816 was a US intergroup trial utilizing ABVD-based therapy with response adaptation based on interim PET imaging; XRT was not allowed per protocol, and counted as an event. In this analysis, we identified patients in S0816 who would have met HD15 criteria for XRT, but did not receive XRT per design. We then modeled the potential impact of XRT on disease control. Patients and Methods:Of 336 eligible and evaluable HIV-negative patients enrolled in S0816, 49 had an end-of-treatment PET (termed "PET3," to be done 6-8 weeks after completion of chemotherapy) that was positive (i.e. Deauville 4-5) upon central review. We simulated the progression free survival (PFS) if XRT had been delivered per HD15 criteria (PET positive disease and ≥2.5 cm), evaluating by assumptions of 50, 80 and 90% control of the disease within the XRT fields. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses were performed with additional size cut-off points of 2.0 and 1.5 cm. Results:The median follow-up for the 49 PET3 positive patients was 71 months (range 9.7-92.6). For these 49 patients, the observed landmark PFS at 2 years after the date of PET3 was 30.6%. Twenty-four (49%), 33(67%), and 40 (82%) of the 49 patients had at least one site of disease that met the HD15 criteria for XRT with ≥2.5 cm, ≥2.0 cm, and ≥1.5 cm size cut-offs respectively. Sixteen, 19, and 25 patients had disease progression respectively from each group at median of 1.4-1.5 months. Twelve, 12, and 15 patients had relapses limited to the sites that would have been radiated following HD15 criteria with ≥2.5 cm, ≥2.0 cm, and ≥1.5 cm respectively. Estimated landmark PFS at 2 years for the 49 PET3 positive patients assuming 50, 80, and 90 % control of the disease within the radiated sites following HD15 guideline with ≥2.5 cm, ≥2.0 cm, and ≥1.5 cm cut-off are summarized in columns A, B, and C of the table respectively. For the entire group of 336 patients, the observed PFS at 2 years was 79%. Estimated 2-year PFS for the entire group of 336 patients assuming 50, 80, and 90 % control of the disease within the radiated sites following HD15 guideline with ≥2.5 cm, ≥2.0 cm, and ≥1.5 cm cut-off are in columns D, E, and F of the table respectively. Conclusion: Among the PET3 positive patients, consolidation XRT per HD15 criteria with cut-off points of 2.5, 2.0, and 1.5 cm could have raised the 2-year PFS by 12-28 % assuming 50-90% local control within radiated sites. However, the improvement in PFS is more moderate at 1.6-3.9 % if we consider the entire cohort of 336 patients. Although there may be some gain in PFS as the cut-off point is lowered by our ROC analysis, one needs to consider the trade-off against potentially increasing normal tissue toxicity as more sites are irradiated. Table. Table. Disclosures Brem: Pharamcyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bartlett:Merck & Co: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ImaginAB: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Evens:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Affimed: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Tesaro: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics International DMC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy. Rimsza:NanoString: Other: Inventor on the patent for the Lymph2Cx assay. Leonard:Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; United Therapeutics: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Biotest: Consultancy; Sutro: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Kahl:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; CTI: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Smith:BMS: Consultancy; Portola: Honoraria. Friedberg:Bayer: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document