scholarly journals Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Cord Blood Versus Mismatched Unrelated Donor with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Analysis from the ALWP of the EBMT

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Bhagirathbhai Dholaria ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Jaime Sanz Caballer ◽  
Annalisa Ruggeri ◽  
Jan J. Cornelissen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Matched Pair Analysis ◽  
Grade Ii

Background Haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has greatly expanded potential donor options for patients (pts) without a fully HLA-matched donor. However, an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (UD) or cord blood transplantation (CBT) are valid options for pts who do not have an haploidentical-related or a fully HLA-matched donor. The incorporation of PTCy with mismatched UD allo-HCT is associated with reduced risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (Jorge et al., BBMT, 2018). No previous study has compared outcomes of these two graft sources in contemporary era. In this study, we compared the outcomes of CBT versus (vs) single antigen-mismatched (HLA 9/10) UD allo-HCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in pts with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods Pts with AML who underwent a first CBT without PTCy (N=902) or allo-HCT from a 9/10 UD with PTCy (N=280) between 2010 to 2019 were selected from The European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry. We excluded pts who had ex vivo T cell depletion. The median pt age was comparable between CBT and UD cohort [51 years (y) vs. 52 y, p=0.09]. The recipients of CBT had a longer median follow up (47 vs. 19 months, p<0.01) compared to UD. The cytogenetic risk category was good in 68 (6%), intermediate in 514 (46%), poor in 184 (16%) and unknown in 416 (35%) pts. Pre-HCT disease status was first complete remission (CR1) in 701 (59%), CR2 in 279 (24%) and advanced (non-CR1/CR2) in 202 (17%) pts. Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) was used in 47% of the total pts and the use of MAC was comparable between the study cohorts (p=0.21). In vivo T cell depletion was used more frequently with CBT compared to UD (40% vs. 26%, p<0.01). A Cox regression multivariate (MV) analysis was performed for the whole population. A matched-pair analysis was carried out by propensity score based 1:1 matching of pts with known cytogenetic risk. Propensity score was based on pt age, gender, Karnofsky performance score, cytogenetic risk group, pre-HCT disease status and intensity of conditioning regimen. Results In the univariate analysis, day +180 incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD was 36% vs. 32% (p=0.07) and grade III-IV acute GvHD was 15% vs. 11% (p=0.16) for CBT and UD cohorts, respectively. The 2-y incidence of total chronic GvHD was 26% vs. 32% (p=0.20) and extensive chronic GvHD was 12% vs. 12% (p=0.83), respectively. CBT was associated with higher incidence of graft failure (11% vs. 4%, p<0.01) and higher 2y NRM (30% vs. 16%, p<0.01) compared to UD. CBT resulted in lower leukemia free survival (LFS) (43% vs. 61%, p<0.01), overall survival (OS) (47% vs. 63%, p<0.01) and GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) (34% vs. 47%, p<0.01). There was no difference in 2y relapse incidence (RI) between study cohorts (28% vs. 23%, p=0.24). There were more infection-related deaths in CBT compared to UD allo-HCT recipients (31% vs. 24% of total reported deaths). Among CBT recipients, 3 pts died from graft failure and 5 pts died from lymphoproliferative disorder. In the MV analysis (Table 1), CBT was associated with higher risk of grade II-IV acute GvHD [hazard ratio (HR)=1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI):1-1.74,p<0.05], NRM [HR=2.09, 95% CI:1.46-2.99, p<0.0001], and RI [HR=1.35, 95% CI: 1-1.83, p=0.05] which resulted in inferior LFS [HR=1.68, 95% CI:1.34-2.12,p<0.0001], OS [HR=1.7, 95% CI:1.33-2.17, p<0.0001] and GRFS [HR=1.49, 95% CI:1.21-1.83,p<0.0001] compared to UD. The chronic GvHD did not differ between the study cohorts [HR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.68-1.3, p=0.69]. Older age and advanced disease status were associated with poor OS. These results were confirmed in a matched-pair analysis, which compared 177 pairs of CBT vs. 9/10 UD allo-HCT pts. CBT was associated with higher 2y NRM (HR=1.96, p<0.01), RI (HR=2.01, p<0.01), and lower LFS (HR=1.98 p<0.01), OS (HR=1.82, p<0.01) and GRFS (HR=1.77, p<0.01) (Figure 1). Grade II-IV acute (HR=1.33, p=0.13) and total chronic (HR=1.02, p=0.93) GvHD rates were comparable between the cohorts. Conclusions In this large registry-based observational study, CBT was associated with inferior LFS, OS and GRFS due to higher NRM and RI compared to 9/10 UD allo-HCT with PTCy. In the absence of a fully matched or haplo donor, 9/10 UD allo-HCT with PTCy may be preferred over CBT in pts with AML. A prospective study is needed to validate our findings. Disclosures Dholaria: Poseida: Research Funding; Angiocrine: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; bms: Research Funding. Labopin:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Blaise:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Chevallier:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria. Mohty:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Impact of Specific Adverse Cytogenetic Features on Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Myelodysplastic Syndrome with Very Poor Risk Cytogenetics: A Study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3953-3953
Author(s):  
Xavier Poiré ◽  
Diderik-jan Eikeman ◽  
Linda Koster ◽  
Johan A. Maertens ◽  
Jan J. Cornelissen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) is a heterogenous disease which is almost incurable without an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Within the revised international scoring system (R-IPSS), MDS with poor and very poor cytogenetics have a much worse outcome after allo-HCT. The very poor cytogenetic subgroup refers to patients harboring more than 3 abnormalities and is therefore a highly heterogenous group. We have shown in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that beyond complex karyotype, specific adverse cytogenetic features such as 7q abnormalities (abn7q), 5q abnormalities (abn5q), 17p abnormalities (abn17p) and monosomal karyotype (MK) worsen the outcomes after allo-HCT. We have therefore retrospectively reviewed MDS with very poor cytogenetics and studied the impact of adverse cytogenetic features on outcomes after transplant. METHODS: We selected MDS patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2001 and 2018 from a matched related or unrelated donor, for whom a full cytogenetic report was available in the EBMT registry. We then stratified them according to the presence of abn7q, abn5q, abn17p, MK and the number of abnormalities (≤5, 6-9 and ≥10). Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and relapse-free survival (GRFS) was defined as survival without grade II-IV acute GvHD, extensive chronic GvHD or relapse. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were identified in the registry. One hundred twenty-three patients (81%) had MDS with excess of blasts and 4 (3%) had secondary AML. Median age was 59 years (interquartile range (IQR), 51-64) and the median follow-up was 38 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 34-60). The time from diagnosis to allo-HCT was a median of 6 months (IQR, 4-8). Two thirds of patients received a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (N = 103, 67%) and 87 patients had a matched unrelated donor (57%). Almost all patients were in first complete remission at time of transplant (N= 149, 97%). Regarding specific cytogenetic features, 87 patients had abn7q (57%), 99 abn5q (64%), 59 abn17p (38%) and 120 MK (78%) with considerable overlap between groups. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 34% (95% CI 26-42%) and 24% (95% CI 17-31%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 59% (95% CI 51-67%) and 18% (95% CI 12-24%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GvHD and chronic GvHD was 33% (95% CI 25-40%) and 44% (95% CI 36-53%) by day 100 and 2 years respectively. The 2-year GRFS was 12% (95% CI 6-17%). The presence of abn5q was associated with a significantly decreased PFS of 17% (95% CI 9-25%) versus 36% (95% CI 23-49%); p=0.05) and GRFS (6% (95% CI 1-11%) versus 23% (95% CI 11-34%); p=0.04). The presence of abn7q was associated with significantly increased NRM (25% (15-34%) versus 9% (2-16%); p=0.02) which did not translate into OS. There were no specific cytogenetic features that had an independent impact on the cumulative incidence of relapse, but age over 55 years did increase the relapse risk (<55: 45% (95% CI 31-59%); 55-65: 65% (95% CI 54-77%); >65: 66% (95% CI 50-83%); p=0.03). A continuous effect was also observed (per decade increase: HR=1.24, 95%CI 1.02-1.52; p=0.03). Patients with an interval of more than 6 months from diagnosis to allo-HCT had almost double the OS (45% (95% CI 32-58%)) compared to patients with an interval less than 6 months (27% (95% CI 17-37%); p=0.04), however a continuous effect was not observed. CONCLUSION: MDS with very poor cytogenetics according to R-IPSS is a very bad group with dismal outcomes after allo-HCT. Within this high-risk group, specific adverse cytogenetic features such as the number of abnormalities, abn7q, abn5q, abn17p or MK did not stratify outcomes further, except for abn5q which was associated with a decreased PFS. Our results might be explained in part by the low number patients and by the over-representation of adverse features within this cohort. Despite that, advancing age was associated with increased relapse. Whilst allo-HCT remains the best therapeutic option for this very high-risk patient group, efforts should focus on post-transplant preemptive intervention strategies to prevent relapse. Disclosures Byrne: Incyte: Honoraria. Schroeder: Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Blaise: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Hayden: Jansen, Takeda: Other: Travel, Accomodation, Expenses; Amgen: Honoraria. Scheid: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yakoub-Agha: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Randomized Trial of Tacrolimus and Methotrexate Versus Tacrolimus, Reduced Dose Methotrexate, and Mycophenolate Mofetil for Prevention of Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Myeloablative Related and Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
Betty K. Hamilton ◽  
Lisa A. Rybicki ◽  
Taylor Lucas ◽  
Donna Corrigan ◽  
Matt Kalaycio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Toxicity Profile ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Reduced Dose ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The combination of tacrolimus (Tac) and methotrexate (MTX) is a standard regimen for GVHD prophylaxis; however, it is associated with several toxicities and patients are often not able to complete the full MTX regimen. The combination of Tac, reduced dose ("mini")-MTX, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been investigated with a well-tolerated toxicity profile and low incidence of GVHD, although comparison with standard dose MTX has not been done. We performed a randomized non-inferiority trial comparing Tac/MTX (Full-MTX) to Tac/mini-MTX/MMF (Mini-MTX) for prevention of GVHD after myeloablative related and unrelated donor HCT. Methods: Patients <70 years in age receiving first myeloablative allogeneic HCT using 8/8 HLA-matched related or unrelated donor were eligible; all diagnoses and both bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell grafts were allowed. Full-MTX patients received MTX dose of 15 mg/m 2 day +1, and 10 mg/m 2 days +3, +6, and +11. Mini-MTX patients received doses of 5 mg/m 2 on days +1, +3, and +6 plus MMF 1000 mg BID. MTX and MMF doses were adjusted for body weight in pediatric recipients. Primary endpoints were incidence of acute GVHD, mucositis, and hematopoietic engraftment. Secondary endpoints included incidence of chronic GVHD, organ toxicity, infection, relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS). Based on our local incidence rates, 45 patients/arm were needed to detect a hazard ratio of at most 1.7 for acute GVHD (no difference between two arms) using a one-sided non-inferiority log-rank test with 5% significance and 80% power. Results: We enrolled 101 patients; 5 were excluded due to change in eligibility or withdrawal of consent prior to HCT. Analysis is based on 96 patients who were randomized to receive Full-MTX (N=49) or Mini-MTX (N=47). Patient characteristics are described in the Table, and were generally balanced between the two groups . All patients in the Mini-MTX arm received their 3 planned doses of MTX; in the Full-MTX arm, 71% received all 4 doses, 26% received 3 doses, and 1 patient received 2 doses of MTX. There was no significant difference in cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD by day 100 between arms (28% Mini-MTX vs 27% Full-MTX, P=0.41) (Figure 1); however, there was a trend toward higher grade 3-4 acute GVHD in Mini-MTX arm (13% vs 4%, P=0.07). Mini-MTX recipients had lower incidence of severe WHO grade 3-4 mucositis (57% vs 82%, P=0.010), shorter duration of mucositis (median 11 vs 18 days, P<0.001), and had faster engraftment of both neutrophils (median 15 vs 17 days, P<0.001) and platelets (median 23 vs 27 days, P=0.023), with resultant shorter hospital stay (median 27 vs 31 days, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the two arms in any grade of chronic GVHD (36% vs 25%, P=0.09) or moderate-severe chronic GVHD at 1 year (23% vs 20%, P=0.14). There were also no differences in bacterial (P=0.18), viral (P=0.52) or fungal (P=0.74) infections. There were no significant differences in hepatotoxicity, but lower proportion of patients receiving Mini-MTX experienced nephrotoxicity (creatinine ≥3X upper limit of normal: 2% vs 26%, P<0.001). Mini-MTX recipients also had less respiratory failure in the first 6 months (6% versus 22%, P=0.026). There was no difference in relapse between arms (2-year incidence 22% vs 21%, P=0.89), although Mini-MTX was associated with lower NRM (11% vs 25% at 2 years) (Figure 2), and non-significant but higher OS (70% vs 52% at 2 years; P=0.06). Conclusions: Compared to Full-MTX, a Mini-MTX regimen that incorporates MMF was associated with no difference in acute or chronic GVHD incidence and a more favorable toxicity profile, with faster engraftment, less mucositis, less organ toxicity, and lower NRM. The combination of Tac/mini-MTX/MMF is an acceptable alternative to Tac/MTX after myeloablative related and unrelated donor HCT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hamilton: Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Equilium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gerds: Imago: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Constellation: Consultancy; Brystol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Constellation: Research Funding; Krtos: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Accutate: Research Funding. Hill: Gentenech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZenica: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene (BMS): Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte/Morphysis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding. Copelan: Amgen: Consultancy. Majhail: Anthem, Inc: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Following Fludarabine Plus 2 Gy TBI or ATG Plus 8 Gy TLI: A Phase II Randomized Study from the Belgian Hematological Society

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 542-542
Author(s):  
Yves Beguin ◽  
Pierre Zachee ◽  
Johan Maertens ◽  
Tessa Kerre ◽  
Aurelie Ory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Dose ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract Background. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) following nonmyeloablative conditioning is increasingly used as treatment for hematological malignancies in older patients or those with comorbidities. One of the most widely used nonmyeloablative conditioning associates fludarabine (90 mg/m² total dose) and 2 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) (Flu-TBI). This regimen can be safely performed in an outpatient setting but is associated with a relatively high incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In an effort to prevent GVHD, the Stanford group have developed another nonmyeloablative conditioning that combines total lymphoid irradiation (TLI, 8 Gy total dose) with ATG (7.5 mg/kg Thymoglobulin® total dose) (TLI-ATG). As these 2 conditioning regimens have not been compared head to head, the Belgian Hematological Society (BHS)-transplantation committee initiated a phase II multicenter randomized study comparing nonmyeloablative allo-HCT with PBSC with either Flu-TBI (TBI arm) or TLI-ATG (TLI arm), and postgrafting immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Here, we report the final analysis of the study. Methods. Patients were randomized 1/1 between TBI or TLI arm. Main inclusion criteria consisted of hematological malignancies not rapidly progressing, age ≤ 75 years of age, and having a HLA-identical sibling donor or 10/10 HLA-matched related or unrelated donors who is fit to donate PBSC. The primary endpoint was the 6-month incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD. Results. 107 patients were randomized in the TBI (n=55) or TLI (n=52) arms between January 2008 and March 2011 in one of the 9 participating centers. Thirteen patients (6 in the TBI and 7 in the TLI arm) were excluded from the analyses because they did not meet the inclusion criteria at the time of the start of the conditioning (disease relapse before the start of the conditioning (n=5), ineligible for further irradiation (n=3), donor refusal to give PBSC (n=2), HLA-mismatched donor (n=2), and poor performance status (PS) precluding transplantation (n=1)). One patient randomized in the TBI arm received the TLI conditioning (and was analyzed in intention to treat in the TBI arm). Thus, the analysis includes data from 94 patients randomized to the TBI (n=49) or TLI (n=45) arm. The 2 groups were well balanced. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 45 (range, 19-65) months. The 180-day cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD were 12.2% versus 8.9% in TBI and TLI patients, respectively (P=0.5). Two-year cumulative incidences of moderate/severe chronic GVHD were 40.8% versus 17.8% in TBI and TLI patients, respectively (P=0.017). Four-year cumulative incidences of relapse/progression were 22% and 50% in TBI and TLI patients, respectively (P=0.017). The difference remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis (HR=2.3, P=0.02). Four-year cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality were 24% and 13% in TBI and TLI patients, respectively (P=0.5). Finally, 4-year overall (OS) and progression-free survivals (PFS) were 53% and 54%, respectively, in the TBI arm, versus 54% (P=0.9) and 37% (P=0.12), respectively, in the TLI arm. Conclusions. In comparison to patients included in the TBI arm, patients included in the TLI arm had lower incidence of chronic GVHD, higher incidence of relapse and similar OS. The study was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT00603954). Disclosures Beguin: Genzyme / Sanofi: Research Funding. Baron:Genzyme / Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding.

A Matched Controlled Analysis of Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide (CY) Versus Tacrolimus and Mini-Dose Methotrexate in Matched Sibling and Unrelated Donor Transplant Recipients Receiving Reduced-Intensity Conditioning: Post-Transplant CY Is Associated with Higher Rates of Acute Gvhd

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4200-4200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin M. Alousi ◽  
Rima M Saliba ◽  
Julianne Chen ◽  
Borje S Andersson ◽  
Issa Khouri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Matched Sibling ◽  
And Control

Abstract Abstract 4200 Graft-vs.-Host Disease (GVHD) remains a common complication following matched sibling and unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Standard GVHD prophylaxis calls for prolonged immune suppression, typically with a calcineurin-inhibitor. Recently, post-transplant cyclophosphamide (CY) has been studied as sole prophylaxis in matched related and unrelated bone marrow (BM) transplant recipients following an ablative conditioning regimen with busulfan (Bu) and CY and demonstrated comparable rates of acute GVHD and lower rates of chronic GVHD as traditional GVHD prophylaxis regimens. We recently conducted a phase II study of post-transplant CY following a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen of Busulfan (Bu) and Fludaribine (Flu) in matched related and unrelated donor transplants and performed a matched-control analysis comparing their results with patients who received traditional GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus and mini-dose methotrexate (MTX) during the same time period. Forty-nine (49) patients were enrolled onto this study. They received Flu at a dose of 40mg/m2 over 1hour followed by intravenous Bu over 3 hours targeting a daily AUC of 4,000 microMol-min on days –6 to –3. Recipients of unrelated transplants received ATG on days –3 to –1 (total dose 4 mg/kg). CY was given as sole GVHD prophylaxis at a dose of 50 mg/kg on days +3 and +4. During the same period of time, 133 patients received a RIC regimen with intravenous Bu/Flu or Flu and melphalan (Mel) and received GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus plus mini-dose MTX (10mg/m2 on day +1, 5mg/m2on days +3, +6, +11). Unrelated donor transplants also received ATG. A computer generated algorithm was used to identify a comparable control group from our departmental database matching, in order of priority, on age, diagnosis, disease status, donor (matched-related versus unrelated) and graft source (PB versus BM). Matched controls (control group) were successfully identified for 37 study patients (Post-Cy group). Results: The median age for the Post- CY group and control group was 61 (range, 39–72) and 62 years (range, 37–72). Eight-one (81) % of patients in both groups had AML or MDS, 3% had ALL and 16% had NHL or CLL. Fifty-nine (59) % of patients in both groups had unrelated donors and received ATG in the conditioning. Disease status for the Post-CY and control groups respectively were CR1: 14 and 14%, CR2: 8 and 11%, >CR2: 38 and 32% and Primary Induction Failure / Untreated: 40 and 32%. Seventy (70) % of the post-CY group received BM versus 48% of the control group, whereas sex mismatching (Male donor for Female patient) occurred in 22% of the post-Cy and 8% of the control group. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD in the post-CY and control groups were: 46% versus 19% (Hazard Ratio (HR): 2.8, 95% CI, 1.1–6.7; p=0.02) and 14% versus 21% (HR: 0.8, 95% CI, 0.2–2.6, p=0.7). Grades III/IV acute GVHD occurred in 14% (95% CI, 6–32) of the patients in the post-CY group whereas there were no cases of grade III/IV in the control group (p=0.02). Overall, progression-free and non-relapse mortality at 2-years are shown in the table below. Conclusion: Post-transplant CY following RIC is associated with higher rates of acute GVHD, with resultant trends for higher non-relapse mortality and lower overall survival when compared to tacrolimus and mini-dose MTX. The use of post-transplant CY as a sole GVHD prophylaxis regimen should be avoided following RIC transplant in matched-related and unrelated donors. Disclosures: Off Label Use: azacitidine: off-label use as maintenance therapy following allogeneic stem cell transplant for MDS/AML.

CD34-Selected, T Cell-Depleted Alternative Donor Stem Cell Transplantation For Children

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2064-2064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Gilman ◽  
Michael Eckrich ◽  
Stacy Epstein ◽  
Carrie Barnhart ◽  
Javier Oesterheld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Primary Graft Failure ◽  
Alternative Donor ◽  
Mast Cell Leukemia ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract Many children who need a hematopoietic stem cell transplant do not have a matched related or unrelated donor. The use of alternative donors including mismatched family members can provide a donor for almost all patients. The use of such donors is associated with a high risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We present the results of a prospective study using the CliniMACS® device for CD34-selection of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts to prevent GVHD under BB-IND 14045. Patients did not receive immunosuppression after transplant. The approach was also used as a platform for a companion post-transplant immunotherapy study. The study included patients with malignant (MD) and non-malignant (NMD) disorders receiving unrelated donor (UD) and mismatched related donors (MMRD) to evaluate the broad applicability of this approach for GVHD prevention. The primary endpoint was acute GVHD incidence and there was a stopping rule for primary graft failure. Overall survival was a secondary endpoint. Between 2009-2013, 30 children underwent CD34-selected PBSC transplantation from an alternative donor. Fifteen patients had MD (ALL 4, AML 8, JMML 1, acute mast cell leukemia 1, Ewing’s sarcoma 1) and 15 had NMD (sickle cell 6, immunodeficiency 5, bone marrow failure 4). Twenty-three patients had MMRD and 7 had UD (all 7 had NMD). The conditioning regimen consisted of TBI 1200 cGy (MD) or melphalan 140mg/m2 (NMD), thiotepa 5mg/kg x2, fludarabine 40 mg/m2x5, and rabbit-ATG 1.5 (MD) or 2.5 (NMD) mg/kg x4. Seven patients with NMD received rituximab x1 during conditioning. Twenty-two patients received a planned (P) donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) between days 30 and 42 with methotrexate GVHD prophylaxis on a companion study. Eight patients received a therapeutic (T) DLI for decreasing donor chimerism or viral infection. The median age at transplantation was 10 years (range 0.3-17). Median CD34+ dose was 21 x 10^6/kg (range 10-25) and all patients received < 1 x 10^4 CD3/kg. The ANC was > 500 at median 14 days (range 9-16). Acute GVHD prior to DLI occurred in 1 patient (3%; stage I skin which resolved with a brief course of prednisone). Primary graft failure occurred in 1 patient (3%). The patient subsequently engrafted after a CD34-selected transplant from the other parent. Two patients who had active disease at transplant (mast cell leukemia, Ewing’s) and early relapse are excluded from the following analyses. Twenty-one of 28 patients are alive with median follow-up of 2 years (range 1 mo-4 yrs). The Kaplan-Meier estimated 100 day and 1 year survival is 96% and 74%, respectively. Relapse occurred in 1/10 MD patients with at least 100 days follow-up. Grade II-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD occurred only after DLI. Acute GVHD grade II-IV occurred in 21% (3 P, 3 T) and chronic GVHD (3 P) in 11%. Viral reactivation was common, but viral disease was less common - CMV 12% and EBV-related PTLD 11% [at risk patients only] and adenovirus 11%. Invasive fungal infections occurred in 7%. All deaths were due to infection, with thrombotic microangiopathy present in 6/7. All outcomes were similar for MD and NMD and for MMRD and UD except for acute GVHD which occurred in 26% MMRD and 0% UD transplants and for EBV-PTLD which only occurred in NMD patients. EBV-PTLD has been reduced in NMD patients by using rituximab in the conditioning. The use of a CD34-selected, T cell-depleted alternative donor PBSC transplant successfully prevented acute GVHD without the need for post-transplant immunosuppression. The use of this approach and the conditioning regimens employed provided reliable engraftment and a very low incidence of Day 100 transplant-related mortality and relapse (for patients without active disease). Future efforts will focus on approaches for post-transplant immunotherapy to decrease morbidity and mortality due to viral infections. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Low Incidence of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide Using Matched Related or Unrelated Donors: Phase II Study Interim Analysis

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1811-1811
Author(s):  
Najla H El Jurdi ◽  
Daniel O'Leary ◽  
Fiona He ◽  
Todd E. DeFor ◽  
Armin Rashidi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Preparative Regimen

Abstract Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potentially curative treatment for many high-risk hematologic malignancies. Myeloablative conditioning is currently the standard of care for young and fit patients; however, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) continues to be a major limitation to the success of HCT, increasing post-transplant morbidity and mortality. An ideal HCT is one combining strategies that reduce incidence and severity of GVHD, without compromising graft-versus-tumor effect. We hypothesized that GVHD prophylaxis regimen consisting of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), tacrolimus (Tac) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) will reduce the incidence of chronic GVHD in patients receiving a standard hematopoietic myeloablative HCT without an increase in risk of malignant relapse. Methods This is an interim analysis of a phase II study using a myeloablative preparative regimen of either: 1. total body irradiation (TBI, total dose 1320 cGy administered twice a day from days -4 to -1) or 2. Busulfan 3.2mg/kg daily (cumulative AUC 19,000 - 21,000 µmol/min/L) plus fludarabine 160mg/m 2 days -5 to -2 for patients unable to receive further radiation, followed by a GVHD prophylaxis regimen of PTCy (50mg/kg days +3 and +4), Tac and MMF (beginning day +5). The primary endpoint is cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive treatment at 1 year post-transplant. Patient and disease characteristics are detailed in Table 1. Eligibility included: age ≤ 60 years, malignant or non-malignant diagnosis, matched related (MRD) or unrelated (MUD) donor with either a bone marrow (BM) or filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood (PB) graft. Results Through October 2020 we treated 63 patients with a median follow up of 502 days post-transplant. Of those, 48% were female and n=11 (17%) younger than 18 with median age at HCT of 36 years (range, 2-55; Interquartile range [IQR], 20-48). Donor source was 8/8 MRD in 44 patients (70%), 8/8 MUD in 18 (29%), and one with 7/8 MUD. Graft source was BM in n=28 (44%) and PB in n=35 (56%). Preparative regimen was TBI in 94% of patients. All patients achieved primary neutrophil engraftment by 42 days, median 16 days (range, 13-27). Overall, 94% achieved platelet engraftment by 6 months, median 25 days (range, 16-98). At day 100, 48 patients (86%) achieved full donor bone marrow chimerism (&gt;95% donor DNA); 29 (52%) and 52 (95%) achieved full donor peripheral blood CD3 and CD33 chimerism (defined as &gt;95% donor). 42 patients (66%) required total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for oral mucositis and regimen-related toxicities during their initial transplant admission. Cumulative incidence of Grade II-IV acute GVHD by 100 days post-transplant was 14% overall (95% confidence interval CI: 6-23%), 7% for MRD and 32% for the MUD group; Grade III-IV acute GVHD was 5% overall (CI: 0-10%), similar for both MRD and MUD group. At 1 year, only two patients receiving a PBSC graft developed chronic GVHD requiring immune suppression, for a cumulative incidence of 3% overall, one in the MRD group and one in the MUD group. Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse was estimated at 21% overall, 22% and 16% for the MRD and MUD groups, respectively. Two year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 13% overall, 15% and 5% for MRD and MUD, respectively. Estimated 2-year overall survival was 79% overall (CI: 65-88%), 75% for the MRD group and 95% for MUD. Estimated 2-year GVHD-free relapse free survival (GRFS) was 57% overall (CI: 42-69%), 56% and 63% in the MRD and MUD groups, respectively. Discussion Myeloablative transplantation with a TBI preparative regimen, followed by a GVHD prophylaxis regimen of PTCy, Tac, and MMF results in very low incidence of chronic GVHD. Importantly, this regimen is feasible and effective for pediatric and adult patients. Further improvement in outcomes can be achieved by incorporating post-transplant relapse mitigating strategies as well as supportive care measures to decrease regimen-related toxicities. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Arora: Kadmom: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding. Janakiram: Bristol Meyer Squibb, Kyowa Kirin, ADCT Therapeutics: Honoraria; FATE, Nektar Therapeutics: Research Funding. Smith: Astellas Gene Therapies: Current Employment. Bachanova: Incyte: Research Funding; KaryoPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; FATE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Brunstein: BlueRock: Research Funding; AlloVir: Consultancy; FATE: Research Funding; NANT: Research Funding; GamidaCell: Research Funding. MacMillan: Equilium: Other: DSMB member; Incyte: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Miller: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ONK Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vycellix: Consultancy; GT Biopharma: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Wugen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Betts: Patent Disclosures: Patents & Royalties: B.C.B. holds a patent (WO2015120436A2) related to CD4+ T cell pSTAT3 as a marker and therapeutic target of acute GVHD. B.C.B. additionally holds a provisional patent (WO2017058950A1) related to the use of JAK inhibitors for rejection and GVHD prevention. . Vercellotti: Mitobridge, an Astellas Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding. Weisdorf: Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Holtan: Generon: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Sirolimus/Tacrolimus Facilitates Preferential Recovery of Regulatory T Cells (Treg) After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT), and Is More Effective Than Methotrexate/Tacrolimus in Preventing Grade II-IV Acute Graft Vs. Host Disease (GVHD) and Moderate to Severe Chronic Gvhd

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 323-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Pidala ◽  
Jongphil Kim ◽  
Heather Jim ◽  
Hugo F. Fernandez ◽  
Marcie Tomblyn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Causes Of Death ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Graft Vs Host Disease ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract Abstract 323 Sirolimus/Tacrolimus Facilitates Preferential Recovery of Regulatory T cells (Treg) after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT), and is More Effective than Methotrexate/Tacrolimus in Preventing Grade II-IV Acute Graft vs. Host Disease (GVHD) and Moderate to Severe Chronic GVHD Background: Clinical translation of the Treg suppressive potential will require definition of a pharmacologic immune suppressive platform conducive to preferential Treg reconstitution post-HCT. Sirolimus has differential impact on Treg and conventional T cells. Patients and Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized phase II trial of sirolimus (SIR) and tacrolimus (TAC) vs. methotrexate (MTX) and TAC. From 9/2008 to 5/2011, a total of 74 patients were randomized 1:1 to SIR/TAC vs. MTX/TAC, stratified by age (> or ≤ 50) and donor relation (related vs. unrelated). SIR was administered as a 9 mg oral loading dose on day -1, followed by maintenance with 4 mg daily adjusted to target 8–12 ng/ml; SIR was continued for at least 1 year. MTX was 15 mg/m2 on day +1, then 10 mg/m2on days +3, 6, and 11. TAC was administered at 0.02 mg/kg/day IV or equivalent oral dosing starting on day -3. Target TAC levels were 3–7 ng/ml for the SIR arm versus 10–15 ng/ml for the MTX arm and were maintained through day 60. TAC was tapered thereafter in the absence of acute GVHD. Patient age for the whole study was 23 to 69 (median 49) years, and disease diagnoses included AML (23), ALL (15), MDS (9), MM (8), NHL (8), CLL (7), CML (2), and MPD (2). Patients received peripheral blood mobilized stem cells from HLA-A, B, C, and DRB1 matched sibling (n=35) or unrelated donors (n=39). Age, diagnosis, disease risk and donor relation were balanced across the two study arms. Serial peripheral blood samples were obtained at baseline pre-HCT, day 0, and days 30, 90, 180, and 360 post-HCT. Treg were defined by the surface CD4+CD25brightCD127negative phenotype. The reciprocal relationship between negative surface CD127 and high intracellular FoxP3 expression was confirmed in a subset (n=15) of day 30 patient samples (r=0.94). Results: Median percent Tregs among blood CD4 T cells at day 30 was 16.3 (range 12.5–17.9) for SIR versus 9.9 (8.6–13.5) for MTX, p < 0.0001, and 14.6 (10.8–18.1) for SIR and 9.7 (7.5–11.6) for MTX at day 90 post-HCT, p = 0.0009. SIR-treated patients had increased absolute numbers of Treg, and decreased absolute numbers of non-Treg CD4+ cells on days 30 and 90. The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade 2–4 acute GVHD for SIR was 43% (95% CI 30–63%), and 89% (95% CI 80–100%) for MTX, p<0.0001. Grade 3–4 acute GVHD for SIR was 16% (95% CI 7–36%) and 13% (95% CI 5–33%) for MTX, p=0.16. The incidence of any grade chronic GVHD for SIR was 51% (95% CI 34–78%) and 67% (95% CI 52–85%) for MTX, p=0.56. The cumulative incidence of NIH consensus-defined moderate to severe chronic GVHD was 20% (95% CI 9–43%) following SIR, and 63% (95% CI 47–83%) for MTX, p=0.013. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was comparable (SIR 16, range 11–22 days; MTX 16, range 12–28, p=0.57), and platelet engraftment was improved with SIR (SIR 12, range 6–20; MTX 16, range 10–33, p=0.012). No significant differences in peak mucositis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), or thrombotic microangiopathy were observed between SIR and MTX. Overall survival did not significantly differ, log-rank p=0.55. Causes of death in SIR included relapse (n=2), and non-relapse death (septicemia 2, acute GVHD 1, chronic GVHD 1, influenza pneumonia 1, RSV pneumonia 1, VOD 1, multi-organ failure 1). Causes of death in the MTX arm were relapse (n=7), and non-relapse death (diffuse alveolar hemorrhage 1, GVHD 1). We performed serial assessment of patient-reported quality of life (QOL) with the FACT-BMT. While those patients in the MTX group had significantly better mean FWB and FACT-G scores at baseline pre-HCT, we did not detect significant differences in any FACT-BMT domain or summary score at day 30 or 90 post-HCT. Further follow up is needed to study longer term recovery of QOL in SIR and MTX treated patients. Conclusions: These results of a randomized, controlled study provide evidence that the combination of SIR/TAC favors Treg recovery and more effectively prevents acute GVHD and moderate to severe chronic GVHD after allogeneic HCT. Disclosures: Alsina: Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Allergan: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with cord blood versus mismatched unrelated donor with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in acute myeloid leukemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhagirathbhai Dholaria ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Jaime Sanz ◽  
Annalisa Ruggeri ◽  
Jan Cornelissen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Matched Pair Analysis ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Pair Analysis ◽  
Matched Donor ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) using a mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) and cord blood transplantation (CBT) are valid alternatives for patients without a fully human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor. Here, we compared the allo-HCT outcomes of CBT versus single-allele-mismatched MMUD allo-HCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in acute myeloid leukemia. Methods Patients who underwent a first CBT without PTCy (N = 902) or allo-HCT from a (HLA 9/10) MMUD with PTCy (N = 280) were included in the study. A multivariate regression analysis was performed for the whole population. A matched-pair analysis was carried out by propensity score-based 1:1 matching of patients (177 pairs) with known cytogenetic risk. Results The incidence of grade II–IV and grade III–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 6 months was 36% versus 32% (p = 0.07) and 15% versus 11% (p = 0.16) for CBT and MMUD cohorts, respectively. CBT was associated with a higher incidence of graft failure (11% vs. 4%, p < 0.01) and higher 2-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) (30% vs. 16%, p < 0.01) compared to MMUD. In the multivariate analysis, CBT was associated with a higher risk of, NRM (HR = 2.09, 95% CI 1.46–2.99, p < 0.0001), and relapse (HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1–1.83, p = 0.05), which resulted in worse leukemia-free survival (LFS) (HR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.34–2.12, p < 0.0001), overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.33–2.17, p < 0.0001), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.21–1.83, p < 0.0001) compared to MMUD. The risk of grade II–IV acute GVHD (p = 0.052) and chronic GVHD (p = 0.69) did not differ significantly between the cohorts. These results were confirmed in a matched-pair analysis. Conclusions CBT was associated with lower LFS, OS, and GRFS due to higher NRM, compared to MMUD allo-HCT with PTCy. In the absence of a fully matched donor, 9/10 MMUD with PTCy may be preferred over CBT.

scholarly journals Combination of ATG and Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Gvhd Prophylaxis in Matched Unrelated Donor Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplants for High-Risk Hematological Malignancies- a Single Centre Experience

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4569-4569
Author(s):  
Shruti Prem Sudha ◽  
Eshetu G Atenafu ◽  
Queralt Salas Gay ◽  
Zoe Evans ◽  
Zeyad Al-Shaibani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Matched Unrelated Donor ◽  
Persistent Disease ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Donor Type

Abstract Background ATG and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) have been individually shown to be efficacious in reducing rates of GVHD in HLA matched and mismatched transplants. We adopted a combination regimen of ATG and PT-Cy for GVHD prophylaxis for matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants in our centre to decrease the rates of acute and chronic GVHD. Patients and methods Pre-transplant conditioning consisted of iv Fludarabine (30mg/m2/day) for 4 days, iv Busulphan (3.2 mg/kg/day for 2 days), and low dose TBI (200cGy on day-1). GVHD prophylaxis was with Thymoglobulin 4.5mg/kg over 3 days (day-3 to -1), PT-Cy 50 mg/kg/day on days+3 and +4 and cyclosporine from day+5 (taper started by day+45 in patients without GVHD). The stem cell source was G-CSF stimulated peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in all patients. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan Meir method. Among variables included in Cox regression analysis to identify predictors of survival were age, pre-transplant remission status, occurrence of CMV infection, donor type (10/10 vs 9/10), and occurrence of acute or chronic GVHD. Results A total of 102 patients (median age 59y, range 22-74y) with high-risk hematological malignancies (AML-55, MDS-20, MPD-9, ALL-5, CML-4, lymphoma-6, CMML-3) were treated with this protocol. Unrelated donors were 9/10 matched in 26 patients, and the rest were 10/10 matched. At a median follow-up of 12 months (range 0.5 to 31 months), the 1year OS and PFS were 66.5% (95% CI -57% -76%) and 57.6% (95% CI 47.6% -67.6%) respectively. The 1year OS for 10/10 transplants was 72.3% (95%CI 61.7%- 82.9%), which was significantly higher than that for 9/10 transplants at 50% (95%CI 30.4%- 69.6%, p=0.016). The 1year PFS for 10/10 donor transplants was 65.5% (95% CI-54.3%- 76.7%) which was significantly higher than that for 9/10 transplants at 34.6% (95%CI 16%- 53.2%, p=0.004). The 9/10 matched patients had significantly higher relapses (hazard ratio 3.2, 95%CI 1.4-7.1, P=.005) than 10/10 matched patients. There were five graft failures (one primary and four secondary). The non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 17.6 %. The overall incidence of acute GVHD was 40% (grade 3-4 acute GVHD was seen in 14.8% patients). The overall incidence of chronic GVHD was 19.6% (moderate/severe NIH stage chronic GVHD was seen in 8.8% patients). The overall relapse rate was 23.3%. CMV re-activation was seen in 50 (49%) patients, and EBV re-activation in 20 (19.6%) patients, and 10 (9.8%) patients were diagnosed with post-transplant lympho-proliferative disorder (PTLD). In univariate analysis, adverse predictors of survival were a) persistent disease at the time of transplant, b) absence of chronic GVHD, and c) 9/10 donor type. In multivariable analysis, the only independent predictors of survival were a) persistent disease at time of transplant [hazard ratio 6.96, 95% CI 1.97-24.7, p=0.003], and b) donor type 9/10 vs 10/10 [HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.15-5.8, p=0.022]. Conclusion Our experience shows that PT-Cy and ATG can be combined for GVHD prophylaxis in MUD PBSCTs with low rates of Gr3-4 acute GVHD and chronic GVHD, and acceptable NRM and relapse rates. There were high rates of viral reactivation including PTLD. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Lipton: ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Comparable Outcomes between Unrelated Donor (8/8 or 7/8 matched) and Haploidentical Donor for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4619-4619
Author(s):  
Jee Yon Shin ◽  
Sung-Soo Park ◽  
Gi June Min ◽  
Silvia Park ◽  
Sung-Eun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Sibling Donor ◽  
Alternative Donor ◽  
Matched Sibling ◽  
Grade Ii

Background Either allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) from HLA-matched sibling donor or immunosuppressive therapy (IST) has been recommended as one of the standard treatments for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Regarding only 30% of chance finding HLA‐matched sibling donor, SCT from an alternative donor including unrelated (URD) or haplo-identical related donor (HAPLO) is considered to be a treatment option after failure to IST in patients who lack of a HLA-matched sibling donor. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of URD SCT and HAPLO SCT for SAA patients. Method Consecutive 152 adult patients with SAA who received first SCT between March 2002 and May 2018 were included: 73 of HLA-well-matched (8/8) URD (WM-URD), 34 of HLA-mismatched URD (MM-URD), and 45 of HAPLO. With the intention to have a follow-up period at least 1 year, data were analyzed at May 2019. A conditioning regimen with total body irradiation (TBI) and cyclophosphamide was used for URD-SCT, whereas that with TBI and fludarabine was administered for HAPLO-SCT (Lee et al, BBMT 2011;17:101, Park et al, BBMT 2017;23:1498, Lee et al, Am J Hematol 2018;93:1368). The combination of tacrolimus and methotrexate were used as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Results The median follow-up was 53.4 (range, 0.2-174.1) months. The median age of URD and HAPLO cohort was 30 (range 18-59) and 34 (range 18-59) years, respectively. Except for one and three patients who failed respective a neutrophil and platelet engraftment, other patients achieved neutrophil and platelet engraftments with median 11 and 15 days for WM-URD, 13 and 16.5 days for MM-URD, and 12 and 14 days for HAPLO, respectively. The five-years overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), and cumulative incidences (CIs) of graft-failure and transplant-related mortality were similar among three groups: 88.3%, 85.5%, 2.7%, and 11.7% for WM-URD; 81.7%, 81.7%, 0%, and 18.3% for MM-URD, and 86.3%, 84.1%, 6.7%, and 9.2% for HAPLO. The 180-days CI of grade II-IV acute GVHD in WM-URD, MM-URD and HAPLO were 35.6%, 52.9%, and 28.9%, respectively; and moderate to severe chronic GVHD were 28.7%, 38.7% and 11.8% in respective cohort. The CI of grade II-IV acute GVHD and moderate to severe chronic GVHD were significantly higher in MM-URD than those in HAPLO (both, p=0.026). ATG is the only factor affecting both grade II-IV acute GVHD (Hazard ratio 0.511, p=0.01) and moderate to severe chronic GVHD (Hazard ratio 0.378, p=0.003) in multivariate analysis. Other complications including CMV DNAemia, hemorrhagic cystitis, invasive fungal disease, secondary malignancy, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome were similar among three groups. Survival outcomes of a subgroup of ≥ 2 allele MM-URD (n=16) extracted form MM-URD were inferior that of other donor types (n=136): 75.0% vs. 86.9% (p=0.163) for 5-year OS and 75.0% vs. 84.7% (p=0.272) for 5-year FFS. Conclusion This study shows that there were no significant differences between alternative donor sources in the absence of suitable matched sibling donor. Host/donor features and urgency of transplant should drive physician towards the best choice among alternative donor sources for SAA patients treated with SCT. However, selection of ≥ 2 allele MM-URD should not be recommended due to high incidence of GVHD and inferior outcomes. Figure Disclosures Kim: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Hanmi: Consultancy, Honoraria; AGP: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SL VaxiGen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria; Yuhan: Honoraria; Sanofi-Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Handok: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BL & H: Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria. Lee:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Achillion: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document