scholarly journals Immunologic Autograft Engineering: 13 Years Follow-up

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3936-3936
Author(s):  
Luis F. Porrata ◽  
David J. Inwards ◽  
Stephen M. Ansell ◽  
Ivana N. Micallef ◽  
Patrick B. Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Entire Cohort

Abstract Our group published a double blind, randomized phase III study (Porrata et al, BBMT 2016; 22: 1017-1023) showing that the infusion of autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) ≥ 0.5 x 10 9 cells/kg is a survival prognostic factor for lymphoma patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APBHSCT). However, a limitation of the study was the short-term follow-up duration of two years post-APBHSCT. To assess if the A-ALC still provide survival benefit we looked at the 121 lymphoma patients enrolled in the phase III from December 10, 2007 until October 12, 2010 survival outcomes with a longer follow-up duration of up to 13 years post-APBHSCT. Since the accrual for the study, 52 patients had died of recurrence lymphoma, 4 patients of therapy-related acute myelogenous leukemia, 3 patients of unknown causes, 1 patient of acute respiratory distress syndrome, 1 patient of anaplastic astrocytoma, and 1 patient of septic shock. The current median follow-up is 86 months (range: 2.1-158.1 months) for the entire cohort and 127.8 months (range: 5.9-158.1 months) for patients still alive. Patients infused with an A-ALC ≥ 0.5 x 10 9 cells/kg continue to experience superior overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.392, 95%CI 0.224-0.687, P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.413, 95%CI 0.253-0.677, P < 0.0004). The 10-year OS rates for the A-ALC ≥ 0.5 x10 9 cells/kg patients was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55%-81%) and for the A-ALC < 0.5 x10 9 cells/kg patients was 36% (95% CI, 25%-49%) (Figure 1A). The 10-year PFS rates for the A-ALC ≥ 0.5 x10 9 cells/kg group was 57% (95% CI, 43%-70%) and for the A-ALC < 0.5 x10 9 cells/kg group was 28% (95% CI, 19%-40%) (Figure 1B). Autograft lymphocyte subset analysis including autograft-CD3 (A-CD3), autograft CD4 (A-CD4), autograft CD8 (A-CD8), and autograft natural killer cells (A-NK), showed that the infusion of A-NK was a predictor for OS (HR = 0.518, 95%CI 0.292-0.919, P < 0.02) and PFS (HR = 0.393, 95%CI 0.230-0.670, P < 0.0006). The 10-year OS rates for the A-NK ≥ 0.09 x10 9 cells/kg patients was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50%-80%) and for the A-NK < 0.09 x10 9 cells/kg patients was 42% (95% CI, 31%-54%) (Figure 1C). The 10-year PFS rates for the A-NK ≥ 0.09 x10 9 cells/kg group was 59% (95% CI, 43%-73%) and for the A-NK < 0.09 x10 9 cells/kg group was 32% (95% CI, 23%-44%) (Figure 1D). Both the A-ALC and A-NK were independent predictor for OS [ A-ALC: HR = 0.367, 95%CI 0.195-0.690, P < 0.001) and A-NK: HR = 0.411, 95%CI 0.275-0.892, P < 0.01] and for PFS [ A-ALC: HR = 0.477, 95%CI 0.271-0.840, P < 0.01) and A-NK: HR = 0.490, 95%CI 0.266-0.903, P < 0.02]. With a longer follow-up of 13 years, this study shows that the infusion of A-ALC continues to provide better clinical outcomes to lymphoma patients undergoing APBHSCT. These study findings support our standard practice changed of not only collecting CD34 stem cell for hematologic engraftment, but also A-ALC for lymphoma patients undergoing APBHSCT to improve clinical outcomes. Further, autograft immune effector studies are warranted such as A-NK to develop a more immunocompetent targeted autologous graft verus tumor effect. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ansell: Bristol Myers Squibb, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Regeneron, Affimed, AI Therapeutics, Pfizer, Trillium and Takeda: Research Funding. Paludo: Karyopharm: Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Isavuconazole Versus Voriconazole in Patients with Invasive Mold Disease (SECURE): Outcomes in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients with Invasive Aspergillosis

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1133-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner J Heinz ◽  
Oliver A Cornely ◽  
Billy Franks ◽  
Fei Shi ◽  
Nkechi Azie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background: Isavuconazole (ISA) is a novel, water-soluble, triazole agent, with broad-spectrum antifungal activity. The SECURE trial (NCT00412893), a Phase III, randomized, double-blind study, investigated the efficacy and safety of ISA vs. voriconazole (VRC) in patients with invasive fungal disease caused by Aspergillus spp. or other filamentous fungi. Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) are at particular risk of developing invasive aspergillosis (IA), which is associated with a high mortality in this population. The outcomes in HSCT patients with IA enrolled in SECURE are presented here. Methods: Patients with proven/probable/possible invasive mold disease were randomized 1:1 to receive ISA or VRC. Patients in the ISA arm received ISA 200mg IV TID for 2 days, followed by 200mg QD (IV or PO) thereafter. Patients in the VRC arm received VRC6mg/kg IV BID on Day 1; 4mg/kg IV BID on Day 2; then either 4mg/kg IV BID or 200mg PO BID. Antifungal therapy was given up to 84 days. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality on Day 42. Overall treatment success (clinical, mycological, and radiological) at end-of-treatment (EOT), safety, and tolerability were also analyzed in HSCT patients with proven or probable IA who received at least one dose of the study drug (mycological intent-to-treat population [myITT]). All outcomes were assessed by an independent data review committee. Results: Of the 527 patients randomized for the SECURE trial, 67 patients with proven or probable IA had a history of HSCT (ISA: n=38; VRC: n=29). Fifty four (80.6%) patients had received an allogeneic stem cell transplant, 32 (47.8%) were neutropenic, and 26 (38.8%) had graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). Mortality was higher in patients with neutropenia (37.5%) compared with those without neutropenia (14.3%; adjusted difference: 17.8; 95% confidence interval: –0.09, 35.6); and, was higher in patients without GVHD (32.6%) compared with those with GVHD (15.4%; adjusted difference; –13.2; 95% confidence interval: –35.3, 8.9). The highest mortality was observed in HSCT patients with neutropenia (Table 1). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 94.7% (ISA) and 100% (VRC) of patients, and drug-related TEAEs in 36.8% (ISA) and 62.1% (VRC) of patients (P=0.051). The percentages of TEAEs in most System Organ Classes were lower in the ISA arm, although the difference between arms only reached statistical significance for cardiac disorders (ISA 15.8% vs. VRC 41.4%; difference –0.256, asymptotic 95% confidence interval: –0.47, –0.04; P=0.027). Conclusion: In this large, prospective, randomized study, IA was shown to adversely affect the outcomes of HSCT patients. Patients with neutropenia at the time of diagnosis had the highest rate of mortality. ISA was demonstrated to be efficacious for the primary treatment of IA in HSCT patients. The analyses of adverse events suggest a safety advantage of ISA compared with VRC. Abstract 1133. Table 1. Efficacy outcomes (myITT population) Outcome ISA arm VRC arm Adjusted difference % (95% CI) Total (ISA+VRC) N Event (%) N Event (%) Event/N (%) All-cause mortality at Day 42 a All HSCT patients 38 8 (21.1) 29 9 (31.0) –7.5 (–25.8, 10.8) 17/67 (25.4) Allogeneic HSCT 32 7 (21.9) 22 6 (27.3) –2.1 (–22.8, 18.6) 13/54 (24.1) Non-allogeneic HSCT 6 1 (16.7) 7 3 (42.9) –38.5 (–72.2, –4.7) 4/13 (30.8) With neutropenia 21 6 (28.6) 11 6 (54.5) –26.0 (–69.6, 17.6) 12/32 (37.5) With GVHD 13 2 (15.4) 13 2 (15.4) 0.4 (–23.4, 24.2) 4/26 (15.4) Without GVHD 26 7 (26.9) 17 7 (41.2) –15.9 (–43.4, 11.5) 14/43 (32.6) Overall success at EOTb 38 10 (26.3) 29 9 (31.0) 4.5 (–13.5, 22.5) 19/67 (28.4) Clinical response at EOT 34 19 (55.9) 28 13 (46.4) –5.8 (–27.1, 15.5) 32/62 (51.6) Mycological response at EOT 38 11 (28.9) 29 9 (31.0) 2.5 (–15.5, 20.4) 20/67 (29.9) Radiological response at EOT 38 8 (21.1) 29 8 (27.6) 8.0 (–9.4, 25.5) 16/67 (23.9) a Adjusted treatment difference calculated for ISA−VRC b Adjusted treatment difference calculated for VRC−ISA Disclosures Heinz: Astellas, Gilead Science, Janssen-Cilag, MSD Sharp & Dohme/Merck, Pfizer : Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Isavuconazole for the treatment of aspergillosis (Marketing Authorization Application has been submitted by Astellas (FDA ) and Basilea (EMA)).. Cornely:Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Franks:Astellas: Employment. Shi:Astellas: Employment. Azie:Astellas: Employment. Maertens:Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

High Dose (HD-AraC) Vs Standard Dose Cytosine Arabinoside (SD-AraC) During Induction and IL-2 Vs Observation After Consolidation/Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML): Final Report of the AML-12 Trial of EORTC and GIMEMA Leukemia Groups on the Value of High Dose AraC

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 257-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roelof Willemze ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Franco Mandelli ◽  
Giovanna Meloni ◽  
Boris Labar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Treatment Difference

Abstract Abstract 257 The AML-12 randomized phase III trial of EORTC-LG and GIMEMA assessed the efficacy and toxicity of HD-AraC (3 g/sqm/12 hrs for 4 days) combined with daunorubicin (50 mg/sqm/d for 3 days) and etoposide (50 mg/sqm/d for 5 days) vs SD-AraC (100 mg/sqm/d for 10 days) with the same drugs, in previously untreated AML < 61 year old patients (APL excluded). Patients (pts) in complete remission (CR) had to receive consolidation consisting of AraC (500 mg/sqm/12 hrs for 6 days) and daunorubicin. Subsequently an allogeneic (allo-SCT) or autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) was planned according to donor availability and age. A 2nd randomization had to be done after evaluation of consolidation in pts without a donor: auto-SCT followed or not by low dose IL-2. The aim of the trial was to detect an 8% treatment difference (from 35% to 43%) in the 5-yr overall survival (OS) rate, corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.80 (alpha=5%, power=95%); secondary endpoints were response to induction, toxicity, disease-free survival (DFS) from CR. Randomization was performed centrally; the 1st randomization was stratified for age (<46 vs > 45 yrs), performance status, WBC and center. Intent-to-treat analysis was done. From 9/1999 till 1/2008, 2005 pts from 68 centers were randomized. Due to insufficient reporting, 3 centers, who recruited 63 patients, have been excluded from the analysis. The remaining 1942 pts (872 pts entered by EORTC-LG and 1070 by GIMEMA) 969 were randomized in SD-AraC and 973 in HD-AraC arm; among them 25 and 28, respectively, were ineligible, but kept in the analysis. Both arms were comparable with respect to gender, age (median=45 yrs), disease history, initial leukocyte count, PS, FAB and cytogenetics. At a median follow up of 6 yrs, 1114 pts had died. Results: After 1 or 2 courses of induction, CR was achieved in 1430 pts (73.6%); 684 (71.9%) pts (SD-AraC group) vrs 746 (78.7%) pts (HD-AraC group): p=0.002. Resistance was documented in 173 (18.2%) vrs 123 (13%), and death during induction in 85 (8.9%) vrs 71 (7.5%) pts, respectively. Induction toxicity profile and grade was similar in the 2 arms except for conjunctivitis grade 3: HD-AraC>SD-AraC. CR rates for pts<46 yrs were 74.7% (SD-AraC) and 81.4% (HD-AraC) and for pts>45 yrs 66.4% (SD-AraC) and 71.8% (HD-AraC). 634 pts (SD-AraC and 686 (HD-AraC) received a consolidation cycle. Among 765 CR-pts<46 yrs 284 pts had an HLA identical sibling (<46D) and 481 did not or had not been typed (<46NoD). Among 665 CR-pts>45 yrs 225 pts had an HLA identical sibling (>45D) and 440 did not or had not been typed (>45NoD). In the <46D group 211 underwent an allo-SCT and 11 an auto-SCT. In the <46NoD group 274 underwent an auto-SCT and 29 a MUD-SCT; in the >45D group 147 underwent an allo-SCT and 14 an auto-SCT. In the >45NoD group 244 underwent an auto-SCT and 12 a MUD-SCT. Comparisons of treatments arm regarding OS from randomization, DFS and Survival (S) from CR are indicated in the Table. The impact of age on the treatment difference regarding OS was almost significant (p=0.06). In pts >45 who reached CR, the decrease in the relapse rate in the HD-Ara-C arm vrs SD-Ara-C arm (45.5% vs 49.4%) was counterbalanced by an increase in the death in CR rate (18.4% vs 13.2%). Conclusion: The final evaluation of the EORTC-GIMEMA AML-12 trial shows that, with a median follow-up of 6 years, HD-AraC in the induction treatment leads to a significantly higher CR rate than SD-Ara-C and results in improvement in overall survival but only in pts under the age of 46 years. Disclosures: Muus: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Beksac:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

A Phase III Study Of ASCT Vs Cyclophosphamide-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide-Prednisone Maintenance Vs Lenalidomide Alone In Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 763-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Francesca Gay ◽  
Andrew Spencer ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
Adam Zdenek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improves survival in multiple myeloma (MM). The introduction of novel agents challenged the role of ASCT at diagnosis. We conducted a multicenter 2X2 randomized trial comparing conventional chemotherapy plus lenalidomide with ASCT followed by maintenance with lenalidomide-prednisone (RP) or lenalidomide (R) alone in newly diagnosed young MM (NDMM) patients. Methods Eligible patients with NDMM ≤ 65 years were enrolled. All patients received Rd induction (four 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 25 mg day 1–21 and low-dose dexamethasone 40 mg day 1,8,15,22) followed by stem cell mobilization. Patients were randomized to receive consolidation with CRD [six 28-day cycles of cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2 day 1,8,15), dexamethasone (40 mg days 1,8,15,22) and lenalidomide (25 mg days 1–21)] or MEL200-ASCT (melphalan 200 mg/m2 with stem-cell support). Patients were randomly assigned to receive subsequent maintenance with RP (28-day cycles of lenalidomide 25 mg days 1–21 plus prednisone 50 mg every other day) or R alone (28-day cycles of lenalidomide 25 mg days 1–21). Primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included safety, responses and overall survival (OS). Data cut off was May 30th, 2013. Results Three-hundred and eighty-nine patients were enrolled in the trial. Patient characteristics were well balanced between CRD (n=194) and MEL200-ASCT (n=195), and between R (n=195) and RP (n=194) arms. Median follow-up was 31 months. In the intent to treat (ITT) analysis, the median PFS was not reached with MEL200-ASCT and 28 months with CRD (the respective 3-year PFS was 60% vs. 38%, HR=0.62, 95%CI: 0.49-0.85, P=0.003). Median time from enrolment to maintenance was 14 months. In the population of patients eligible for maintenance, 2-year PFS from the start of maintenance was 73% for RP and 56% for R patients (HR= 0.57, 95%CI: 0.34-0.93; P=0.03). In the subgroup of patients who received MEL200-ASCT, 2-year PFS from the start of maintenance was 83% for patients who received RP and 64% for those who received R alone (HR=0.36 95%CI: 0.15-0.87, P=0.02). In the subgroup of patients who received CRD, 2-year PFS from the start of maintenance was 64% for patients who received RP and 47% for those who received R alone (HR=0.75, 95%CI: 0.40-1.39, P=0.36). At present, no differences in OS were noticed between patients randomised to received CRD or MEL200-ASCT, and between patients who received RP or R maintenance. As expected, the rates of grade 3-4 hematologic (85% vs. 26%, P<0.001) and non-hematologic (35% vs. 19%, P=0.003) adverse events (AEs) were higher in the MEL200-ASCT arm compared with the CRD arm. The main non-hematologic AEs were infections (18% vs. 5%, P=0.001) and gastrointestinal AEs (18% vs. 3%, P<0.001). Rates of grade 3-4 hematologic (8% vs. 7%, P=0.85) and non-hematologic (12% vs. 13%, P=0.88). AEs were similar in the RP and R arms. The main non-hematologic AEs in both RP and R groups were infections (3% vs. 3%). At present, 6 second primary malignancies and 3 cases of cutaneous basalioma have been reported. Conclusions MEL200-ASCT significantly prolonged PFS in comparison with CRD. At present no difference in OS was reported, this may be due to the low number of events and to the length of follow-up. The increase in toxicity with MEL200-ASCT did not adversely impact on efficacy. The addition of prednisone to lenalidomide maintenance significantly reduced the risk of progression in comparison with lenalidomide alone, without increasing the toxicity. Updated data with longer follow-up will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Palumbo: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gay:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spencer:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Larocca:Celgene: Honoraria. Caravita:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Petrucci:Celgene: Honoraria. Hajek:Celgene: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Pre-/Post-HSCT Imatinib Improves Survival of Childhood with BCR/ABL+ Acute and Chronic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5248-5248
Author(s):  
Fuyu Pei ◽  
Qi Li ◽  
Wenfeng Xu ◽  
Zhiyong Peng ◽  
Xuedong Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Stem Cell Source ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cell Source

Abstract Objective:To evaluate the effect of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for children with leukemia in our center in recent years. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 87 patients with leukemia underwent HSCT at a median age of 8 years from February 2006 to December 2013 in our center. The median follow-up time was 28 months (range, 2-96), the ratio of male to female patients was 59:28. Conditioning regimen included cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, busulfan with or without (w/o) thiotepa. Anti-thymocyte globulin and cytarabine were individually used for the patients with lymphoid leukemia and myeloid leukemia. GVHD prophylaxis included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil w/o post-transplant cyclophosphamide. Median nucleated cells: 3.75 (1.16`7.56) × 107/Kg. Patients with BCR/ABL+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) received imatinib before and after transplant over 6 months per each one. Twenty-six patients received transplant from sibling donors, 31 from haploidentical donor, 30 from unrelated donors; Status before transplant were grouped as CR1 (n= 57), CR 2 (n=13), CR 3 (n=1) and NR (n=16). Source of stem cells included PBSC in 40 cases, UCB in 3 cases, BM in 24 cases, BM+PBSC in 9 cases, and mixed stem cells (BM /PBSC+ UCB) in 11 cases. Results: The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) was 56.8 ± 5.8% in total.Among them, OS was 54.3 ± 8.0% in 45 patients with ALL; 85.7 ± 13.2% in 8 patients with BCR/ABL+ALL; 48.6 ± 8.7% in 37 patients with BCR/ABL-ALL. 32.8 ± 15% in 29 patients with acute myeloid leukemia and 82.5 ± 11.3% in 13 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia, respectively. Single factor analysis showed there was no significant difference for OS in comparison of BCR/ABL+ALL, BCR/ABL-ALL, AML and CML (P=0.057), but patients with BCR/ABL+ALL had higher OS compared to those with BCR/ABL-ALL (P=0.048) and to AML (P=0.040). In comparison of difference status before transplant, OS were 55.2 ± 11.6%, 54.9 ± 15.6%, 0,and 27.5 ± 11.6% in CR1, CR2, CR3 and NR, respectively (P=0.025). OS was higher in CR1 than NR (P=0.005). When comparing stem cell source, OS was 65.5 ± 8.5%, 0%, 41.7 ± 11.4%, 33.3 ± 15.7%, and 72 ± 17.8% in PBSC, unrelated CB (UCB), BM, BM+PBSC, and BM/PBSC+UCB transplants, respectively (P=0.003); PBSC transplant associated with higher OS than BM (P=0.049) and BM+PBSC (P=0.009); and BM/PBSC+UCB mixed transplant had highest OS (P=0.026). Multivariate analysis showed Risk factors for OS only remained stem cell source (P=0.046) and status before transplantation (P=0.048). the transplant types (P=0.023), and follow up time(P=0.017). Conclusion: Comparing with data reported in literature we have similar outcomesin total for childhood with leukemia. Use of imatinib pre-/post-transplant for patients with BCR/ABL+ALL conduces to the highest OS in current study. Stem cell sources and the status before transplant have a significant effect on OS. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Bone Marrow (BM) Microenviroment Factors As Early Markers of Response in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML-CP) Treated with Nilotinib

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1570-1570
Author(s):  
Santa Errichiello ◽  
Simona Caruso ◽  
Concetta Quintarelli ◽  
Biagio De Angelis ◽  
Novella Pugliese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Optimal Response

Abstract Introduction Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) have completely changed the scenario of CML and dramatically improved the outcomes. Thus, early identification of patients expecting poor outcome is crucial to offer alternative TKI regimens or in some selected cases stem cell transplantation before disease progression may occur. The Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Trial as First-Line Treatment (ENEST1st) is a phase 3b is an open-label study of nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (BID) in adults with newly diagnosed BCR-ABL positive CP-CML. Aim of the ENEST1st sub-study N10 was to investigate BM microenvironment markers that regulate leukemic stem cells in the bone marrow (BM) niche of Nilotinib-treated patients. Methods The study enrolled patients in 21 Italian ENEST1st participating centers. Response was based on ELN recommendations (Baccarani M, et al. Blood 2013 122:872-884). In an interim analysis, molecular and cytogenetic response by 24 months was assessed. Mononuclear cells were collected from BM and PB samples at the screening visit (V0) and after 3 months of treatment (V4). RT-qPCR for the expression of 10 genes (ARF, KIT, CXCR4, FLT3, LIF, NANOg, PML, PRAME, SET and TIE), involved in the stemness and hematopoietic stem cells survival signaling regulation was conducted. RT-qPCR data were normalized by the expression of GUS mRNA (normalized copy number, NCN). Plasma samples were collected at different time points from both BM or PB samples. Concentrations of 20 different analytes, including IL-1a, IL-3, M-CSF, SCF, SDF1-a, TRAIL, HGF, PDGF-bb, IL1b, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-15, G-CSF, GM-CSF, MIP-1a, TNF-a, and VEGF, were simultaneously evaluated using commercially available multiplex bead-based sandwich immunoassay kits. Results 33 out of 37 patients enrolled were available for an interim molecular analysis at 24 months: an optimal response was achieved in 25 patients, a warning response in 5 patients and a failure response in 3 patients. We observed a significant correlation between the expression of two genes involved in the regulation of stem cell pluripotency (NANOg) or cytokine signaling (SET) and patient outcome. Indeed, NANOg and SET mRNA were significantly down-regulated in PB samples at diagnosis of patients with optimal response compared to patients with warning/failure response (NANOg mRNA: 0.3±0.25 NCN vs 0.6±0.7 NCN, respectively; p=0.05; SET mRNA: 0.2±0.3 NCN vs 2.3±4.2 NCN, respectively; p=0.03). We also investigated the plasma level of several factors involved in the hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Some of these markers showed a significant correlation with patient's outcome when evaluated at diagnosis in either PB or BM samples. Indeed, high level of IL12 (in the BM samples), or HGF, mCSF and SCF (in the PB samples) were associated to a worst prognosis markers, since significantly correlating with no MMR@12months (IL12, p=0.03), intermediate/high Socal score (mCSF, p=0.03; SCF, p=0.03), no reduction of MMR below to 1 at 3 month (SCF, p=0.04) or warning/failure response to Nilotinib treatment (HGF, p=0.03; SCF, p=0.04). Indeed, we find a lower levels of PDGFb, SDF1, TNFa, TRAIL (in the BM samples), and HGF, SDF1, TRAIL (in the PB samples) in those patients with intermediate/high Hasford or Sokal score (PDGFb, p=0.0007; SDF1, p=0.02), warning/failure response to Nilotinib treatment (HGF, p=0.03) or lacking of MMR4.0 (SDF1, p=0.01; TNFa, p=0.02; TRAIL, p=0.05). Conclusion/Summary Taken together, our results suggest that the expression analysis of genes involved in cell pluripotency (NANOg) and/or cell signaling (SET) at baseline, may indicate early achievement of deep molecular response in shown CML-CP patients treated with nilotinib. In addition, in patients with optimal response to Nilotinib, high concentration of SDF-1, TRAIL (inversely correlated with BCR-ABL, and associated to an higher susceptibility to apoptosis in the leukemic blasts) were observed as well as BM TNF (cell-extrinsic and potent endogenous suppressor of HSC activity). A lower concentration of several factors associated to hematopoietic progenitor cell growth and survival (including HGF, SCF and IL12) were observed compared to patients failing to achieve response to Nilotinib. These data strongly suggest that stromal microenvironment supports the viability of BCR-ABL cells in BM niches through direct feeding, or environment releasing of survival factors. Disclosures Soverini: Novartis, Briston-Myers Squibb, ARIAD: Consultancy. Martinelli:MSD: Consultancy; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Saglio:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria. Galimberti:Novartis: Employment. Giles:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Alternative Donors (Umbilical Cord Blood and Haploidentical Donors) for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed / Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Retrospective Analysis of the EBMT Lymphoma Working Party and the Spanish Group of Stem Cell Transplantation (GETH)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4399-4399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Martinez ◽  
Jorge Gayoso ◽  
Carmen Canals ◽  
Herve Finel ◽  
Andrea Bacigalupo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cord Blood ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Umbilical Cord ◽  
Umbilical Cord Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is currently considered the standard of care for those patients with HL that relapse after autologous HSCT. Several studies have shown that fit patients with chemosensitive disease can benefit from alloHSCT using and identical sibling (SIB) or matched-unrelated (MUD) donors. Recently, encouraging results have been obtained using haploidentical donors (HAPLO) and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (ptCY) as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis (GVHD). Because information regarding the results of alloHSCT using alternative donors is still scarce, we aimed to compare outcome of umbilical cord blood (UCB) and HAPLO transplants with conventional SIB and MUD for HL. Patients and methods: Information of patients older than 17y with HL who received an alloHSCT from a SIB, MUD (8/8 antigen matched), UCB or a ptCY-based HAPLO between 2010-2013 was downloaded from the EBMT and GETH databases. Results: 773 patients with HL were identified meeting the inclusion criteria. 339 received a transplant from a SIB donor, 276 from a MUD, 101 from HAPLO, and 47 from UCB. A significant higher number of patients treated with alloHSCT from UCB and HAPLO donors received reduced intensity (RIC) regimens in comparison to SIB and MUD (76% and 88% vs. 69% and 69%, respectively, p=0.001). Bone marrow was more frequently used as source of stem cells in the HAPLO group in relation to SIB and MUD (61% vs 10% and 11%, respectively, p=0.001), Other variables such as sex, age, performance status, chemorefractory disease, and previous autologous SCT were balanced. Median follow-up after alloHSCT for all patients was 12 months (1-60). The 1-year probabilities of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 80% and 49% after SIB transplant, 69% and 54% after MUD, 65% and 40% after UCB, and 73% and 56% after HAPLO, respectively. The 1-year probabilities of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse rate (RR) were 12% and 38% after SIB, 21% and 25% after MUD, 20% and 40% after UCB, and 18% and 27% after HAPLO. Multivariate analysis showed that, in comparison with standard SIB alloHSCT, UCB was associated with a trend to a higher NRM (p=0.08) and RR (p=0.06), leading to a significant lower OS and PFS (p=0.009, HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.6; p=0.02, HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3; respectively). NRM was also significantly higher after MUD (p=0.004, HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.6), but in contrast, RR was lower (p=0.003 HR 0.6, 95%CI 0.5-0.9) with a lower OS (p=0.002, HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.1) and no significant differences in PFS. No significant differences were observed between HAPLO and SIB in NRM, RR, PFS and OS. Conclusions: This registry study suggests that in adults with advanced HL, the outcome of pt-CY-based HAPLO HSCT may be comparable to that of conventional SIB alloHSCT and MUD across multiple centers and conditioning regimens. These findings need to be corroborated by longer follow-up. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Peggs: Autolus: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Cellectis: Research Funding. Milpied:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Afanasiev:CELLTRION, Inc.: Research Funding. Russell:Therakos: Other: shares. Sureda:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Patterns of Relapse Among Myeloma Patients Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4524-4524
Author(s):  
Prashanth Kumar ◽  
Nisha Joseph ◽  
Dhwani Almaula ◽  
Lawrence H Boise ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Biochemical Relapse ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Symptomatic Relapse

Abstract Introduction: In younger patients that are transplant-eligible, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) prolongs overall survival based on several prospective randomized control trials. Nevertheless, ASCT is not a curative approach and majority of the patient's relapse, requiring further salvage therapeutic options. However, in the face of an ongoing paradigm shift in myeloma therapeutics, there is a significant knowledge gap regarding how patients relapse following ASCT. We analyzed the patterns of relapse among myeloma patients after ASCT. Methodology: We have evaluated a total of 975 patients that underwent ASCT during the period January 2008 through June 2014 from our myeloma database. 273 patients had documented evidence of first relapse post-ASCT on the laboratory parameters, radiologic or pathologic findings based on IMWG criteria for relapse. We categorized the relapses as biochemical vs symptomatic, and described their frequencies and characteristics. Median time of follow up from diagnosis is 68 months and from ASCT is 54 months. We used IBM SPSS version 23.0 to generate the survival statistics. Results: Median time from ASCT to relapse is 20 months. A total of 182 (66.7%) patients (105M, 77F) experienced biochemical relapse, while 91 (33.3%) patients (50M, 41F) had symptomatic relapse. More IgA patients (30.8% vs 23.1%, p=0.06) relapsed as symptomatic myeloma. While characterizing relapses, we did not find any differences in symptomatic relapses by the risk group [high risk (31.3%) vs standard risk (31.9%), p=0.193, ISS stage I (29.3%) vs II (32.9%) vs III (32.8%), p=0.807] or by maintenance [yes (30.7%) vs no (38.1%), p=0.211]. Among the patients that had a symptomatic relapse, presence of new bone lesions (52%) and anemia (42%) are the most common forms of relapse seen. Only 4% presented as hypercalcemia and 1% presented as renal failure illustrating the benefits of closer follow up. Overall survival is similar among patients that relapsed as biochemical or symptomatic relapse (log rank, p=0.105). More importantly, impressive median OS of 145 months from the ASCT among this entire cohort (at median follow up 54 months, figure 1). Conclusions: Two-thirds of the patients relapse as a biochemical relapse post-ASCT. The patterns of biochemical vs symptomatic relapses were similar among patients by maintenance, by risk status and also by the ISS stage. The significant improvement in OS among the entire cohort emphasizes the power of the new therapeutic salvage strategies aimed at gaining the survival advantage even among this selected group of patients undergoing early relapses. Disclosures Kaufman: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Lonial:Novartis: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Nooka:Spectrum, Novartis, Onyx pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Outcomes with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3963-3963
Author(s):  
Qamar Iqbal ◽  
Moazzam Shahzad ◽  
Ezza Tariq ◽  
Laila Hashim ◽  
Abdul Basit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

Abstract Background: Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a disorder characterized by the hyper-stimulation of the immune system. HLH has a poor prognosis with up to a 100% mortality without an adequate therapy. Contrary to primary HLH, an efficient management approach has yet to be established for secondary HLH in adults. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in this context. Methods Following the preferred reporting items for systemic reviews and Mata-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed on 4 databases (PubMed, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Embase and Clinicaltrials.gov) using MeSH terms and keywords for "Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic" AND "Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation" AND "Therapeutics" AND "Treatment Outcome" from the date of inception to June 2021. Our search produced 2346 results and duplicates were removed. After excluding irrelevant and review articles during primary and secondary screening, seven original studies reporting HSCT as the treatment for secondary HLH in pediatric and adult patient population were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using NIH quality assessment tool. Inter-study variance was calculated using the Der Simonian-Laird Estimator. Proportions along with 95% confidence Interval (CI) were extracted to compute pooled analysis using the 'meta' package by Schwarzer et al. in the R programming language (version 4.16-2). Results: A total of 136 patients from 7 studies were included. The median age of the patients was 32 (0.5-77) years and 57.4% (62/108) were males as reported by 4 studies. (Table 1) Allogeneic HSCT was used as a treatment modality for 100% (n=136) of the patients. The median time from diagnosis to HSCT was 4.9 (0.1-24) months as reported by 3 studies and median follow-up time was 22 (3-192) months as reported by 4 studies. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) after HSCT was 80% (95% CI 0.66-0.91, I 2 =21%, n=59) with pooled complete response (CR) of 54.5% (95% CI 0.19-0.87, I 2 =86%, n=59) and pooled partial response (PR) of 22.4% (95% CI 0.04-47, I 2 =72%, n=59). At a median follow-up of 30 (3-120) months, the pooled overall survival (OS) was 78.8% (95% CI 0.67-0.89, I 2 =41%, n=136). The pooled relapse rate (RR) was 12.2% (95 CI 0.045-0.22, I 2 =0%, n=61). The pooled incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) grade I/II and grade III/IV was 37.5% (95% CI 0.24-0.51, I 2 =0%, n=48) and 19.8% (95% CI 0.09-0.32, I 2 =0%, n=50) respectively, while pooled incidence of chronic GVHD was 26% (95% CI 0.13-0.41, I 2 =25%, n=50). Conclusion: HSCT shows excellent response rates and survival in patients with secondary HLH with an acceptable safety profile and should be considered. However, it is imperative that large prospective studies should be done to consolidate these findings. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures McGuirk: Novartis: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Astelllas Pharma: Research Funding; EcoR1 Capital: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite/ Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expense, Kite a Gilead company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pluristem Therapeutics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Reduced Intensity Vs. Myeloablative Conditioning Followed By Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Long Term Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized EBMT Phase III Study (RICMAC-Trial)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1019-1019
Author(s):  
Nicolaus Kroeger ◽  
Simona Iacobelli ◽  
Linda Koster ◽  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Introduction Retrospective studies in MDS/sAML suggest that reducing the intensity of the conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation reduces the risk of non-relapse mortality but is associated with a higher risk of relapse. A higher risk of relapse after RIC was confirmed in a prospective BMT CTN study but the prospective randomized studies from the EBMT for MDS and sAML did not show a difference in outcome after 2 years (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;35(19):2157-2164). Here we present a long term follow-up of the study after a median follow-up of 75 months (range 4-150 months). Methods Within the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) we conducted a prospective, multicenter, open label, randomized phase III trial comparing comparing a busulfan based (Busulfan 8mg/kg orally or equivalent dosis intravenously (iv) plus fludarabin 180mg/m²) reduced intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) and a standard myeloablative busulfan (Busulfan 16mg/kg orally or equivalent dosis iv plus cyclophosphamide 120mg/kg) based regimen (MAC) in patients with MDS or sAML (<20 % blasts). Between May 2004 and December 2012, a total of 129 patients were enrolled from 18 centers. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio and stratified according to donor, age and blast count. Results In the first report (JCO 2017) the CI of NRM after 1 year was 17% (95% CI 8-26%) after RIC and 25% (95% CI 15-36%) after MAC (p = 0.29). The CI of relapse at 2 years was 17% (95% CI 8-26%) after RIC and 15% (95% CI 6-24%) after MAC (p = 0.6), resulting in a 2 year relapse-free and overall survival of 62% (95% CI 50-74%) and 76% (95% CI 66-87%) after RIC and 58% (95% CI 46-71%) and 63% (95% CI 51-75%) after MAC (p = 0.58 and p = 0.08, respectively). In the current follow-up study, all cases but one who were alive at last report could be updated. The median follow-up is now 75 months in the MAC and 72 months in the RIC arm. Since last follow-up =18 death occurred in both arm (MAC n=8, RIC n=10) 8 relapses (MAC n=4; RIC n=4) and 6 NRM (MAC n=2; RIC n=4). Second allogeneic stem cell transplantation was performed in 18 patients (n=10 in RIC and n=8 in MAC) due to graft failure (n=4) relapse (n=11) and others (n=3). The CI of chronic GvHD at 5 years was 65% (95% CI: 53-78) after RIC and 68% after MAC ((95% CI: 55-81; p = 0.70). At 5 years there was no difference in CI of NRM (22%, 95%CI: 12-32 vs 30% , 95%CI : 19-42, p=0.5) in CI of Relapse (22% , 95% CI: 12-32 vs18%, 95% CI: 8-28, p= 0.7), Relapse free- (57%, 95% CI: 44-69 vs51%, 95% CI: 39-64, p=0.8) and Overall survival (69%, 95% CI: 58-80 vs 53%, 95% CI: 40-65, p=0.15) between RIC and MAC, respectively. Conclusion This long term follow-up of the prospective randomized EBMT trial confirmed early results that RIC resulted in at least similar long term relapse-free and overall survival as MAC in patients with MDS or sAML. The trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01203228. Disclosures Niederwieser: Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding. Platzbecker:Celgene: Research Funding. Scheid:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Stelljes:MSD: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; JAZZ: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Heim:Novartis: Research Funding. Bethge:Miltenyi Biotec GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Neovii GmbH: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kobbe:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document