Hyperacute Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Analysis of Risk Factors, Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 734-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Couriel ◽  
Rima Saliba ◽  
Marcos J. de Lima ◽  
Chitra Hosing ◽  
Borje Andersson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
P Value ◽  
Skin Involvement ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract Objective: To evaluate risk factors, clinical manifestations and outcome of hyperacute or early acute graft-versus host disease (GVHD), defined as that occurring within 14 days after hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. Methods: A total of 815 consecutive patients transplanted at UT MD Anderson Cancer Center between 1/1998 and 9/2002 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Of 381 patients presenting with acute GVHD, 22% (n=83) had biopsy-proven hyperacute GVHD. Grade I GVHD occurred in 12% of these patients, grade II in 53%, grade III in 13% and grade IV in 22%. The proportion of grade II-IV GVHD in this group was significantly higher (88%) than in the 298 patients presenting with acute GVHD between days 15 and 100 (64%, p value <0.001). The majority of patients with hyperacute GVHD had skin involvement (89%), followed by GI (43%), and liver GVHD (19%). Skin involvement was significantly more common (89% vs 76%, p value 0.01), and more severe (stage III or IV 63% vs 32%, p value <0.001) in the hyperacute group. There was no statistical difference in frequency and severity of visceral involvement. Risk factors for hyperacute GVHD were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards model. On univariate analysis, a mismatched (MM) related (HR=4.4, p value<0.001) matched unrelated (MUD) graft (HR=2.4, p value<0.001) and a myeloablative preparative regimen with or without TBI (HR=2.5, p value<0.001) were significantly associated with a higher rate of hyperacute GVHD. These effects remained significant in a multivariate model. Donor’s age greater than 40 years was associated with a lower rate of hyperacute GVHD (HR=0.6,p value=0.05), and there was a trend for increased rates for patients receiving sex mismatched grafts, solid tumor transplants or multiple (>5) chemotherapy regimens before transplant. Age, disease status, GVHD prophylaxis, or stem cell source (BM vs peripheral HSC) were not associated with hyperacute GVHD. Overall mortality was significantly higher within 6 months post transplant for patients with hyperacute GVHD (HR=2.2, p value <0.001) compared to all other patients, or to patients developing acute GVHD after day 14 (HR=1.6, p = 0.009). GVHD-related death was also significantly higher (HR=2.3, p=0.007) in the hyperacute GVHD group. Conclusions: Hyperacute GVHD occurs in a substantial proportion of patients undersgoing HSC transplant, even prior to neutrophil engraftment. Skin involvement, grades 3–4 GVHD and a higher mortality are common features of this syndrome . Patients at high risk or with a diagnosis of hyperacute GVHD should be included in clinical studies whenever possible.

Risk Factor Analysis for Predicting Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease of Progressive or Quiescent Type in a Cohort of Patients with a History of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5337-5337
Author(s):  
Sang Kyun Sohn ◽  
Dong Hwan Kim ◽  
Jin Ho Baek ◽  
Jong Gwang Kim ◽  
Kyu Bo Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background: As a series of our previous investigation (Haematologica, 2005. 90: 939–48) identifying poor prognostic factors (lymphocytopenia and visceral involvement) at the onset of acute GVHD (aGVHD) in patients with a history of aGVHD after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), we tried to identify variables that could predict the development of chronic GVHD of progressive or quiescent type (pq cGVHD) and patients’ outcome after the diagnosis of cGVHD in cohort of 99 patients who experienced aGVHD after allogeneic SCT. Patients and Methods: We evaluated the risk factors for cGVHD of pq cGVHD with various clinical parameters in patient group with a history of aGVHD and also the prognostic significance of various clinical parameters at diagnosis of cGVHD to determine the prognostic factor for GVHD-specific survival (GSS) in patients with pq cGVHD. Results: From 118 patient experienced aGVHD of any degree, 99 patients were evaluated for cGVHD. The cumulative incidence of overall and extensive pq cGVHD at 2 years was estimated as 84.4% and 63.1%, respectively. In univariate analyses for risk factors of pq cGVHD, severe grade 3,4 aGVHD, primary treatment failure (PTF), lymphocytopenia (≤100/μl), elevated ALP (&gt;160IU/l), visceral involvement, hepatic or gut involvement were identified. Especially, severe aGVHD (p=0.022 and &lt;0.001), PTF (p=0.009 and 0.010) for overall and extensive pq cGVHD, lymphocytopenia (p=0.031) for extensive pq cGVHD, and elevated ALP (p=0.001) for overall pq cGVHD were independent risk factors. The prediction model of subsequent pq cGVHD validated these risk factors with respect to the incidences of overall pq cGVHD (48.6% versus 91.9% for no risk factor versus 1~3 risk factor(s)) and of extensive pq cGVHD (34.2% versus 59.6% versus 92.2% for no / 1 / 2~3 risk factors). HLA-disparity and stem cell source did not influence on the development of pq cGVHD in this cohort. The GSS and probability of systemic immunosuppressive treatment at 2 year after diagnosis of cGVHD was estimated as 55.9% and 51.9%. The GSS was significantly associated with the performance status (p=0.004) and lymphocytopenia (≤ 1,000/μl, p=0.022) at diagnosis of cGVHD by Cox’s proportional hazard model. Conclusion: Severe aGVHD, PTF, lymphocytopenia and elevated ALP may be useful predictive factors for the development of pq cGVHD in a cohort of patients who experienced a GVHD after allogeneic SCT. Figure. The significance of the predictive model for the development of overall (A) or extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD; B) after occurence of acute GVHD Figure. The significance of the predictive model for the development of overall (A) or extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD; B) after occurence of acute GVHD

Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine for Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Matched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplants. A Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium Study..

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2883-2883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark P. Atlas ◽  
Gregory Yanik ◽  
Rakesh Goyal
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Matched Unrelated Donor ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract Calcineurin inhibitors form the backbone of graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In the adult literature tacrolimus was demonstrated superior to cyclosporine in preventing grade II–IV acute GVHD in both related and unrelated donor transplants; however, there is no data comparing their efficacy in the pediatric population. In a multi-institutional trial, we prospectively evaluated the clinical data on 102 patients receiving either cyclosporine/methotrexate or tacrolimus/methotrexate based prophylactic regimens for 6/6 matched unrelated donor, transplant. Conditioning regimens were fully ablative; no T-cell depletion was permitted; cord blood donors were excluded. Patients were required to receive either cyclosporine or tacrolimus, but the choice was per investigator preference. The two arms were reasonably balanced: 59.8% of patients received cyclosporine and 40.2% of patients received tacrolimus. Rates for maximum grade II–IV acute GVHD were 37.7% for cyclosporine and 39% for tacrolimus (p = 0.89). Rates for maximum grade III–IV acute GVHD were 19.6% for cyclosporine and 24.4% for tacrolimus (p = 0.57). Incidence of chronic GVHD in 97 evaluable patients was 37.9% in 58 patients who received cyclosporine and 35.8% in 39 patients who received tacrolimus (p = 0.84). Survival at 1 year post-transplant was similar in both groups: 59.2% for cyclosporine and 51.2% for tacrolimus (p= 0.31). Toxicity analysis is ongoing. In pediatric matched unrelated donor transplantation, the efficacy of tacrolimus/methotrexate and cyclosporine/methotrexate based regimens for prophylaxis of GVHD are not significantly different.

Severe Gut Acute Graft Versus host Disease (GVHD) Influence Thrombotic Microangiopathy in 86 Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Recipients Who Received Tacrolimus-Based Regimen for GVHD Prophylaxis

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1955-1955
Author(s):  
Jorge Labrador ◽  
Oriana López-Godino ◽  
Lucía López-Corral ◽  
Estefanía Pérez-López ◽  
Mónica Cabrero-Calvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Thrombotic Microangiopathy ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Allogeneic Hsct ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Acute Graft

Abstract Abstract 1955 Background and aims: Transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a significant complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although endothelial injury represents the final common pathway of disease, the exact pathophysiology of TA-TMA remains unclear. A variety of potential risk factors have been proposed such as different conditioning regimens, the development of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD), concomitant infection, or the use of calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine, tacrolimus) and sirolimus. The recent use of both tacrolimus and sirolimus for GVHD prophylaxis suggest increasing the risk of TA-TMA, especially in patients receiving busulfan and cyclophosphamide. However, there are little studies in which tacrolimus/sirolimus GVHD prophylaxis was compared with other tacrolimus-based regimens in order to determine the really increased incidence of TA-TMA. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors of TA-TMA in 86 allogeneic-HSCT recipients who received tacrolimus-based regimens (with sirolimus or with methotrexate) for GVHD prophylaxis. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 86 consecutive allogeneic-HSCT recipients (aged over 18 years) transplanted in our unit between September 2007 and July 2012; GVHD prophylaxis consisted on tacrolimus and methotrexate (N = 19) or tacrolimus and sirolimus (N= 64); 3 patients received tacrolimus and sirolimus for acute GVHD treatment. Median age was 51 years (range 20–68) and 59.3% male. 40.7% of patients were diagnosed of acute leukemia, 23.3% myelodisplastic syndrome, 23.2% lymphoproliferative disorders, 7% multiple myeloma, 5.9% other hematological malignancies. The EBMT status at the moment of HSCT was intermediate/advanced in 63% of patients. The source of stem cells was peripheral blood in 87.2% and bone marrow in 12.8%. 57% of patients receiving an unrelated donor transplant. Nineteen patients (22.1%) received a HLA-mismatch graft. Reduced intensity conditioning was administered in 74.4%. 67.4% developed acute GVHD, 58.1% grade II-IV acute GVHD. Median follow-up was 248 days (range 16–1357). The diagnosis of TA-TMA was considered according to probable TMA criteria as defined by validation study by Cho et al. Results: TA-TMA occurred in 9/86 patients (10,5%): 2/19 patients in the tacrolimus-methotrexate regimen group (10.5%) and 7/67 in the tacrolimus/sirolimus regimen group (10.4%). Median time until diagnosis of TA-TMA was 67 days (range, 37 – 405 days), and 8/9 patients were diagnosed before the day +110 post-HSCT; none of them developed chronic GVHD previously to the diagnosed of TA-TMA. Several variables have been analyzed but only acute GVHD (p=0.026) and acute gut GVHD (p=0.007) were significantly associated with TA-TMA in the univariate analysis. Of note, in the tacrolimus/sirolimus group, only acute gut GVHD (p=0.04) but not acute GVHD, was associated with TA-TMA. In the multivariate analysis, only grade ≥2 acute gut GVHD retained their association with TA-TMA development (OR = 13.33, 95% CI = 1.51 – 117.38). Conclusions: In contrast to previously published evidence, these data support that the use of tacrolimus/sirolimus GVHD prophylaxis does not increase the risk of TA-TMA compared to tacrolimus/methotrexate regimen. However, none of the patients included in our study have received busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning. On the other hand, the most important risk factor for TA-TMA in allogeneic-HSCT recipients who received tacrolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis regimens was grade ≥2 acute gut GVHD. Consequently we propose especially close monitoring for TA-TMA in these patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

How I treat chronic graft-versus-host disease

Blood ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 1196-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgia B. Vogelsang
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Late Complication ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is now a commonplace procedure. Clinicians who care for patients with hematologic malignancies and aplastic anemia are almost certain to follow up patients after SCT. This review is intended to help clinicians observe patients for probably the most important late complication of SCT, chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). It reviews the pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical manifestations, evaluation, treatment, and supportive care of chronic GVHD.

Pre-Engraftment Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Value as a Predictor of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Non-Relapse Mortality.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1968-1968
Author(s):  
Shigeo Fuji ◽  
Sung-Won Kim ◽  
Takahiro Fukuda ◽  
Shin-ichiro Mori ◽  
Satoshi Yamasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Primary Role ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Acute Graft

Abstract Background: In a mouse model, it has been shown that inflammatory cytokines play a primary role in the development of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Here, we evaluated whether the pre-engraftment CRP value, which is used as a surrogate marker of inflammation, could predict post-transplant complications including GVHD. Methods: The medical records of 224 adult patients (median age, 47 years; range, 18–68 y), who underwent conventional (CST, n=105) or reduced-intensity (RIST, n=119) allogeneic stem cell transplantation between January 2002 and July 2006 were reviewed retrospectively. Their diagnosis included AML (n=94), ALL (n=23), NHL (n=62), MDS (n=27) and others (n=18). Stem cell sources included bone marrow (n=108), peripheral blood stem cells (n=98) and cord blood cells (n=18). Patients were categorized according to the maximum CRP value during the pre-engraftment neutropenic period: the “low CRP” group (CRP &lt; 15 mg/dL) included 157 patients and the “high CRP” group (CRP≥15 mg/dL) included 67 patients. We assessed the occurrence of acute GVHD, non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival. Results: The incidence of documented infections during neutropenia was higher in the high CRP group (34% vs 17%, P=0.004). The CRP value was significantly lower after RIST than after CST (P=0.017) or after related than after unrelated transplantation (P&lt;0.001). A multiple logistic regression analysis showed that male sex, unrelated donor and HLA-mismatched donor were associated with high CRP values. The high CRP group developed significantly more grade II-IV acute GVHD, grade III-IV acute GVHD and NRM as shown in Figure 1 and 2. A multivariate analysis showed that a high CRP level was associated with an increased risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD, poor OS and high NRM. Conclusion: The present findings suggest that the CRP value may reflect the net degree of tissue damage due to the conditioning regimen, inflammation, infection and allogeneic immune reactions, all of which lead to subsequent acute GVHD and NRM. Future clinical studies to evaluate the feasibility of earlier intervention and adjustment of GVHD prophylaxis based on monitoring of the early CRP value are warranted. Fig 1 grade II-IV acute GVHD Fig 1. grade II-IV acute GVHD Fig 2 non-relapse mortality Fig 2. non-relapse mortality

Identification Of Patients At High Risk Of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Gvhd Prophylaxis

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4611-4611
Author(s):  
Gabriel Afram ◽  
Jose Antonio Pérez Simón ◽  
Mats Remberger ◽  
Teresa Caballero-Velázquez ◽  
Rodrigo Martino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Female Donor ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Introduction Chronic Graft-versus-Host disease (cGVHD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in long-term survivors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Among the major risk factors previously noted is sex-mismatch, acute GVHD and peripheral hematopoietic blood stem cell grafts (PBSC). Our aim in this study was to determine risk factors for cGVHD and evaluate the impact of ATG on cGVHD in a multi-centre setting. Methods Patients from three centers (Stockholm, Sant Pau, Barcelona and Salamanca) were included. Retrospective data analysis was conducted for all patients (n=820) transplanted between 2000 and 2006. In our cohort 91% had malignant disease, 57% received HLA-identical sibling donor grafts, 13% received grafts with one HLA-A, -B or –DR antigen mismatch and 30% received grafts from HLA-A, -B and –DR matched unrelated donors. Reduced intensity conditioning was given to 65% of the patients. Chronic GVHD was classified according the National Institute of Health consensus criteria. Results Overall incidence of cGVHD was 46% for patients surviving more than three months after ASCT (n=747). Older patient age HR 1.15 (95% CI 1.07-1.24), p<0.001, acute GVHD HR 1.30 (95% CI: 1.04-1.63), p=0.024, and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) HR 1.36 (95% CI 1.04-1.79) p=0.028 were shown to significantly increase the risk of overall cGVHD in multivariate analysis. In addition, female donor to male recipient HR 1.43 (95% CI 1.07-1.92), p=0.02, RIC HR 1.65 (95% CI 1.18-2.30) p=0.003, and PBSC HR 1.90 (95% CI 1.14-3.16), p=0.01 significantly influenced the risk of moderate-to-severe cGVHD in multivariate analysis. For both overall and moderate-to-severe cGVHD, ATG had a protective effect with HR 0.41 (95% CI 0.32-0.52) p<0.001 and HR 0.32 (95% CI 0.23-0.46) p<0.00, respectively. Accordingly, we developed a scoring system including all variables influencing the risk of cGVHD in multivariate analysis allowing us to distinguish patient cohorts with 12% to 71% incidence of cGVHD (figure 1). Relapse free survival (RFS) was significantly impaired in the group with severe cGVHD. RFS was not affected significantly by the addition of ATG. All three centers had similar overall survival for patients with cGVHD. Conclusion RIC increases the risk for both overall and moderate to severe cGVHD. Acute GVHD and older recipient age are significant risk-factors for overall cGVHD and female donor to male recipient and PBSC for moderate to severe cGVHD. ATG significantly reduces the risk of all grades of cGVHD without having a negative outcome on RFS. Therefore, in order to prevent overall and moderate-extensive cGVHD it should be added to the RIC regimen in older patients and in male patients with female donors after PBSC grafts. Disclosures: Ringden: Gilead : Invited to Gilead on July 28, 2011, to participate in an Advisory Board Meeting on Treatment of invasive fungal infection. Other. San Miguel:Jansen, Celgene, Onyx, Novartis, Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Acute and chronic graft versus host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplant

JBMTCT ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-66
Author(s):  
Vaneuza A. M. Funke ◽  
Maria Claudia Rodrigues Moreira ◽  
Afonso Celso Vigorito
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Graft versus host disease is one of the main complications of Hematopoietic stem cell, in­volving about 50% to 80% of the patients. Acute GVHD clinical manifestations and therapy is discussed, as well as new NIH criteria for the diagnosis and classification of chronic GVHD. Therapy for both refractory chronic and acute GVHD is an important field of discussion once there is no superiority for the majority of the agents after primary therapy has failed. Hence, this review is meant to be a useful tool of consultation for clinicians who are dealing with this complex complication.

scholarly journals Benefits and challenges with diagnosing chronic and late acute GVHD in children using the NIH consensus criteria

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey D. E. Cuvelier ◽  
Eneida R. Nemecek ◽  
Justin T. Wahlstrom ◽  
Carrie L. Kitko ◽  
Victor A. Lewis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Host Disease ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Nih Consensus Criteria ◽  
Adjudication Committee

Abstract Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) and late acute graft-versus-host disease (L-aGVHD) are understudied complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children. The National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria (NIH-CC) were designed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of cGVHD and to better classify graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) syndromes but have not been validated in patients &lt;18 years of age. The objectives of this prospective multi-institution study were to determine: (1) whether the NIH-CC could be used to diagnose pediatric cGVHD and whether the criteria operationalize well in a multi-institution study; (2) the frequency of cGVHD and L-aGVHD in children using the NIH-CC; and (3) the clinical features and risk factors for cGVHD and L-aGVHD using the NIH-CC. Twenty-seven transplant centers enrolled 302 patients &lt;18 years of age before conditioning and prospectively followed them for 1 year posttransplant for development of cGVHD. Centers justified their cGVHD diagnosis according to the NIH-CC using central review and a study adjudication committee. A total of 28.2% of reported cGVHD cases was reclassified, usually as L-aGVHD, following study committee review. Similar incidence of cGVHD and L-aGVHD was found (21% and 24.7%, respectively). The most common organs involved with diagnostic or distinctive manifestations of cGVHD in children include the mouth, skin, eyes, and lungs. Importantly, the 2014 NIH-CC for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome perform poorly in children. Past acute GVHD and peripheral blood grafts are major risk factors for cGVHD and L-aGVHD, with recipients ≥12 years of age being at risk for cGVHD. Applying the NIH-CC in pediatrics is feasible and reliable; however, further refinement of the criteria specifically for children is needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document