Patterns and Timing of Initial Relapse in Patients with Hodgkin’s and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3673-3673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sughosh Dhakal ◽  
Tithi Biswas ◽  
Sheema Chawla ◽  
Nikhil Uppal ◽  
Christopher Beck ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose/Objective: To evaluate patterns of recurrence in patients with Hodgkin’s (HL) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) who subsequently undergo autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). In this population that has declared itself as high risk, we evaluated time to and sites of relapse relative to initial sites of disease and radiation therapy (RT). This information might enhance understanding of the natural history of these diseases in the setting of modern therapy, influence treatment strategies, and assist in screening decisions. Materials/Method: We analyzed the records of all 281 consecutive patients with refractory or recurrent HL and NHL (indolent and aggressive, as defined at initial diagnosis) who underwent ASCT in our center between 5/92–7/03. Patients were initially diagnosed between 1979–2003 at a median age of 44 years (8–70). 25 patients were unevaluable due to insufficient data, and 68 patients were excluded from analysis because their disease was refractory to initial and salvage therapy. HL patients were segregated according to initial staging (I/II vs. III/IV). Results: Early stage HL patients relapsed at a median of 2.0 years (0.5–10.3) with 87% relapsing in initial disease site(s); 13% (95% CI 3.8–30.1%) relapsed only in new sites. Advanced stage HL patients relapsed at a median of 1.4 years (0.6–10.5) with 96% relapsing in initial site(s); 4% (95% CI 0.1–21.9%) relapsed only in new sites. Indolent histology NHL patients relapsed at a median of 2.1 years (0.5–14.9) with 83% relapsing in initial site(s); 17% (95% CI 7.3–32.8%) relapsed only in new sites. Aggressive histology NHL patients relapsed at a median of 1.0 year (0.3–8.0) with 64% relapsing in initial site(s); 36% (95% CI 26.2–46.2%) relapsed only in new sites. For early stage HD patients, recurrences were predominantly local, and uniformly so in those unirradiated. For all other groups, fewer patients were irradiated than unirradiated and local recurrences predominated regardless of therapy. Conclusions: Almost all patients with HL who relapse and subsequently undergo ASCT initially recur in previous disease sites. Although patients with aggressive histology NHL are more likely to relapse in new sites than patients with indolent NHL, local recurrences predominate in both groups. The median time to recurrence is brief (1–2.1 years). In a population defined by recurrent disease, it is expected that relapses will occur in irradiated sites. Relative protection by RT of local recurrence cannot be determined until all patients, regardless of relapse status, are analyzed. However, these data support an emphasis on local control and suggest that the frequency of screening be most rapid in the early post-therapy years. Comparison of Site(s) of Relapse to Site(s) of Initial Presentation HL NHL Early (n=30) Adv. (n=23) Ind. (n=40) Agg. (n=95) Characteristic % % % % New Site(s) 13 4 18 36 Previous site(s) only 63 61 60 44 Previous site(s) + new site(s) 23 35 23 20 Characteristic n n n n Radiated patients relapsing in previous site(s) 15/19 6/6 5/7 20/34 Unradiated patients relapsing in previous site(s) 11/11 16/17 26/33 42/61

1995 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Pendlebury ◽  
M. El Awadi ◽  
S. Ashley ◽  
M. Brada ◽  
A. Horwich

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3155-3155
Author(s):  
Daniel B. Fried ◽  
David E. Morris ◽  
Thomas C. Shea ◽  
Robert Z. Orlowski ◽  
Hendrik W. Van Deventer ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose/Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of chemotherapy alone compared to chemotherapy plus radiation in the management of adult early stage aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years were evaluated. Materials/Methods: Randomized trials published after 1990 comparing chemotherapy alone to chemotherapy plus radiation therapy in the management of adult aggressive NHL were identified through searches of MEDLINE and CANCERLIT databases. In addition, a search of ASTRO, ASCO, and ASH Proceedings from 1999 to the present was performed to identify updates of published articles and abstracts. Studies that were limited to GI sites only were excluded. Only studies employing CHOP or CHOP-like regimens and radiation therapy to a minimum dose of 30 Gy were deemed acceptable. Chemotherapy alone regimens had to consist of a minimum of 4 cycles of therapy. All trials reported OS and DFS at 5 years. A meta-analysis was performed using STATA statistical software, including tests for homogeneity and publication bias. Trials were analyzed by risk ratio (RR) method. Results: Five randomized trials (n = 1933, range for individual studies 215 to 647) were identified that met all inclusion criteria. The 5-yr OS and DFS RRs for the addition of radiation therapy to chemotherapy are presented in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. Three studies suggested an OS and DFS benefit with the addition of radiation to chemotherapy and two suggested an improved OS and DFS among patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Only two of the studies reported patterns of relapse (Aviles et al and Horning et al). These studies showed improved local control with combined modality therapy (16 – 23% vs. 4 – 5%). Risk ratios for OS ranged from 0.90 to 1.56. DFS estimates range from 0.89 to 1.82. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the overall treatment effects for this group of studies for both OS and DFS. Due to the high degree of heterogeneity among these trials (p-value for heterogeneity <0.001 for both OS and DFS), summarizing these results with a pooled estimate of effect would be inappropriate. Heterogeneity was decreased only marginally with the exclusion of any individual study from the pooled estimate. Conclusions: It remains unclear whether early stage aggressive NHL patients benefit from the addition of radiation to CHOP-based chemotherapy. However, at this time we are not able to delineate those patients who will benefit from radiotherapy from those who will not. Currently CHOP-based chemotherapy plus radiation remains a standard of care in the US for early stage aggressive NHL. However, controversy remains regarding the role of radiation in light of conflicting results. Our ability to draw firm conclusions based on this review is limited due to the study heterogeneity. Differences among study populations may largely account for this heterogeneity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document