Prospective Evaluation of the International Prognostic Score (IPS) in All Stages of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Treated with ABVD Plus Involved-Field Radiotherapy (IFRT).

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1454-1454
Author(s):  
Santiago Pavlovsky ◽  
Claudia Corrado ◽  
Miguel A Pavlovsky ◽  
Virginia Prates ◽  
Lucia Zoppegno ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The prognostic score for Hodgkin’s lymphoma was defined as the number of adverse prognostic factors presented at diagnosis. Seven factors had similar independent prognostic effects. This model was validated retrospectively in advanced disease using different therapeutic approaches (D Hasenclever et al N Eng J Med339:1506–14, 1998). Methods: From December 1996 up to October 2005, the GATLA completed a risk-adapted therapy with ABVD and IFRT. Patients with stages I-IIIA without bulky disease, who achieved complete remission (CR) after three cycles of ABVD, favorable group (FG) received only IFRT 25 GY to areas of >2 cm at diagnosis. Patients with FG not in CR after three cycles of ABVD, slow responders (FGSR), all stages IIIB-IV and all bulky disease, unfavorable group (UG) received six cycles of ABVD and IFRT 30 GY at remaining areas after 3 cycles of ABVD. A total of 584 patients, completed therapy; of them 513 were evaluated with the IPS. Patients were divided in three groups according to the number of adverse prognostic factors 0–1, 2–3, and ≥ 4. Results: The number of patients, complete remission (CR) rate, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OSV) at 5 years according to prognostic factors in the 513 patients were as follows: IPS # patients (%) # CR (%) % EFS % OSV 0–1 224 (44) 217 (97) 86 95 2–3 241 (47) 213 (88) 73 90 ≥4 48 (9) 40 (83) 65 72 P< 0.020 0.001 0.001 A total of 200 patients with FG had a 5 years EFS and OSV of 89% and 98% while 53 patients with FGSR had an EFS and OSV of 66% and 88% respectively (P<0.001). The IPS in FG and FGSR was 0–1 of 61% versus 49%, 2–3 of 38.5% versus 43% and ≥4 of 0.5% versus 8% respectively (p=0.003). In UG with an EFS and OSV of 72% and 87%, the incidence of IPS 0–1 was 29%, 2–3 was 54% and ≥4 was 17%. Conclusion: The IPS is an excellent tool to predict outcome. Patients with stages I-IIIA without bulky tumour who did not achieve CR after three cycles of ABVD (FGSR) had poorer IPS than FG. In spite of receiving six cycles of ABVD, those with FGSR instead of three of those with FG had statistically a poor outcome. In the PET-TC era, patients who remain positive after three cycles of ABVD will need an intensified therapy with the purpose of improving the bad prognosis.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5004-5004
Author(s):  
Ibraheem H Motabi ◽  
Syed Ziauddin A. Zaidi ◽  
Shahid Iqbal ◽  
Atta Munawar Gill ◽  
Imran Khan Tailor ◽  
...  

Abstract The International Prognostic Score (IPS) is the standard stratification system for survival in patients with classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL). However, the IPS only applies to patients with advanced stage disease and it does not offer risk stratification for classical Hodgkin's lymphoma patients diagnosed with limited disease [i.e., stages I and IIA, without constitutional symptoms and no bulky disease. Furthermore, early interim positron emission tomography (PET) has been shown to have a prognostic value superior to that of the IPS in patients with advanced-stage cHL in an analysis (Gallamini et al). Lymphopenia (<600/ul), monocytosis >750 per ul (Tadmore et al) and high tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) are reported to be negative prognostic factors for survival in classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (Koh et al). More recent studies suggested a prognostic role for the peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte count/absolute monocyte count (ALC/AMC) ratio at diagnosis in cHL patients treated with multitude of chemotherapies (Porrata et al, Tadmor et al). It is intriguing to investigate the significance of the ALC/AMC ratio in relation to PET negativity after treatment. Out of 164 cases of cHL treated at our center with ABVD +/- radiation therapy, we identified 70 patients who were evaluated by PET Scan. Median age was 26 years (range 14-80), 33 (47%) were stage IV, Median IPS was 3 (range1-6). We tested correlation of a high ALC/AMC ratio (>2.1) with achievement of a negative PET scan after ABVD chemotherapy. We arbitrarily chose cut-off value of >2.1 (Tadmore et al) from the multiple values reported recently, as this multicenter study had the largest number of patients. A total of 45 patients achieved a negative PET scan. Mean ALC/AMC ratio was 2.39 (range0.19-14.6). ALC/AMC ratio of >2.1 did show a trend for better OS in addition to a negative PET scan. A Spearman correlation test of a negative PET result showed a positive correlation with ALC/AMC ratio of >2.1 though it was weak. This study suggests that the ALC/AMC ratio may be a simple, inexpensive, and independent prognostic factor in cHL outcome and may have a role in the stratification of cHL patients in addition to the International Prognostic Score, TAM content and acheivement of a negative PET scan early post chemotherapy. However we plan to define our own best cut off value for ALC/AMC ratio by ROC and AUC analysis as ALC/AMC Ratio of ≥2.1 did not discriminate survival advantage very well and it may be a reason for weaker correlation with likelihood of a negative PET. Further larger studies are needed to confirm our findings. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ljubomir R. Jakovic ◽  
Biljana S. Mihaljevic ◽  
Maja D. Perunicic Jovanovic ◽  
Andrija D. Bogdanovic ◽  
Vesna M. Cemerikic Martinovic ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5577-5577
Author(s):  
Julia Bohlius ◽  
Heinz Haverkamp ◽  
Volker Diehl ◽  
Houchingue Eghbali ◽  
Jeremy Franklin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In patients with early stage unfavorable Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) event-free-survival (EFS) is low compared to patients with early favorable or advanced stage disease. An international collaborative study was initiated to identify prognostic factors that could help to define among early stage unfavorable patients those who might benefit from more intensive treatment. Methods: Medline and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials in stage I/II HL. Trials should concern patients with one or more risk factors (age, sex, stage, B-symptoms, bulky disease, number of areas involved, laboratory parameters) receiving 4–6 cycles of ABVD or similar chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Only trials with ≥ 100 patients per study arm were considered. Individual patient data were collected. Results: Six studies were identified: GHSG: HD5, HD8, HD11; EORTC: H6U, H7U, H8U. Data from 4,235 patients enrolled between 08/1982 and 01/2003 were available for analysis. The proportion of missing data was very low for demographic and clinical characteristics (&lt; 1%); it was acceptable (1.5–9%) for laboratory parameters with the exception of albumin (41% missing values, not recorded in 3 trials). Patient characteristics are listed below. The median follow up was 58.4 months (95% CI 56–61). At the time of analysis 612 patients had experienced an event (disease progression, relapse or death) leading to a 5-year EFS rate of 85%. Using an univariate Cox-regression stratified by study and treatment arm several parameters showed significant influence on EFS. Conclusion: The data set available is sufficiently powered to identify relevant prognostic factors. A multivariate analysis using updated data will be presented. Baseline parameter of inlcuded studies Age (median years) Male sex Sage (I/II) B symptoms Bulky disease Hb (median g/dL) All patients, n=4,325 32 2,039 (48.1%) I: 546 (12.9%), II: 3,688 (87.1%) 1,490 (35.2%) 1,936 (45.7%) 12.9 Missing data 1 (&lt; 1%) 0 1 (&lt; 1%) 35 (&lt; 1%) 0 82 (1.9%)


Author(s):  
Berthe M.P. Aleman ◽  
John M.M. Raemaekers ◽  
Radka Tomiŝiĉ ◽  
Margreet H.A. Baaijens ◽  
Roberto Bortolus ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document