Lenalidomide and Rituximab Are a Promising Combination in Vitro, in Vivo Preclinically and in a Phase I/II Clinical Trial in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3058-3058
Author(s):  
Michael Wang ◽  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Fredrick Hagemeister ◽  
Sattva Neelapu ◽  
...  

Abstract Relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is difficult to treat. Rituximab (R) targets CD20 antigen on the surface of MCL cells while lenalidomide (Len) may target the microenvironment of MCL cells and enhance the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity of R. To test this hypothesis, we initiated preclinical studies and a phase I/II clinical trial. In the preclinical study we found that Len and R induced growth inhibition and apoptosis of both cultured and fresh primary MCL cells. Len enhanced R-induced apoptosis via upregulating phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal protein kinases (JNK), Bcl-2, Bad; increasing release of cytochrome-c; enhancing activation of caspase-3, -8, -9 and cleavage of PARP. Daily treatment with Len increased NK cells by 10 times in SCID mice. The combination of Len and R decreased tumor burden and prolonged survival of MCL-bearing SCID mice. In the phase I/II clinical trial, Eligible patients (pts) with MCL had 1–4 lines of prior therapies. Treatment consisted of Len given orally daily on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle and R 375 mg/m2 by IV infusion weekly for 4 weeks only during the first cycle with the first dose on Day 1 in Cycle 1. A standard 3+3 dose escalation was used to determine MTD with Len doses at 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25 mg. Detailed toxicity profile in phase I was reported previously (Wang et al, ASH 2007). Two DLT s occurred at 25 mg including 1 grade 3 hypercalcemia and 1 grade 4 non-neutropenic fever during the first cycle. Six patients from phase 1 were at 20 mg dosage level. One patient from phase 1 was initially at 25 mg dosage level and was subsequently reduced to 20 mg dosage level due to DLT. Eight patients have been enrolled in the phase II trial at MTD. In the 14 patients evaluated at 20 mg dosage level in phase II, median age was 68 (51–77); median prior therapies were 2 (1–4); median cycles received to date were 4 (range 2–26). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxic events included neutropenia (35), febrile neutropenia (2), and thrombocytopenia (11). There was no grade 3–4 anemia. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxic events included fatigue (2) and myalgia (1). Fourteen pts at MTD (20 mg) including 7 in phase I plus 7 in phase II were evaluable for response. Eight out of 14 pts achieved responses including 4 CRs, 4 PR s, 2 SD and 4 PD s. Conclusions: Lenalidomide in combination with rituximab provided a synergistically therapeutic effect on mantle cell lymphoma cells by enhancement of apoptosis and R-dependent NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity preclinically. Lenalidomide plus rituximab showed early evidence of response with a very favorable toxicity profile in a phase I/II clinical trial. Updated information will be presented at the conference.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2748-2748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Mark Mainwaring ◽  
Nancy Peacock ◽  
Dianna Shipley ◽  
Edward Arrowsmith ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2748 Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a relatively rare but aggressive form of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) which is incurable with standard chemotherapy. Treatment options range from observation to allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplantation. The optimal therapy remains to be defined. Combination cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens containing anthracyclines such as R-CHOP or R-hyperCVAD used in other forms of lymphoma are clearly active. However, there appears to be a trade-off between intensity of the treatment and durability of the remission making delivery of the higher intensity, durable regimens difficult in some populations such as the elderly. Bortezomib (BOR) and lenalidomide (LEN) are commonly used in multiple myeloma and have also demonstrated activity in lymphoma including MCL. Rituximab (RIT) is effective in a broad array of CD20 positive lymphomas. The purpose of this study was to develop an effective, non-anthracycline containing treatment regimen that could be delivered to a broad patient population. Methods: Eligible patients had biopsy-proven MCL, ≤1 prior therapy, ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2, and adequate organ and bone marrow function. A brief phase I portion established the MTD. Dose limiting toxicities were defined as: grade 4 neutropenia or febrile neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia or platelet transfusion, uncontrolled grade 3 nausea or diarrhea, any clinically significant grade 3/4 treatment-related non-hematologic toxicity, or the inability to start Cycle 2 due to treatment related toxicity. Dose limiting toxicity in the phase I portion of this study occurred at 15mg of LEN on days 1–14 followed by 7 days of rest: 1pt with grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 neuropathy, and 1 pt with grade 3 total body rash resulting in hospitalization. Based on these events phase II dosing was established at: LEN 10mg PO daily on days 1–14, BOR 1.3mg/m2 IV (days 1, 4, 8 and 11), and RIT 375mg/m2 (days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; 375mg/m2on day 1 of subsequent cycles). Treatment was repeated every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles. Patients were assessed for response by International Lymphoma Response Criteria (Cheson 2007) after completing cycles 3 and 6. Phase II study objectives included: assessments of safety and tolerability of this three-drug regimen, and a preliminary estimate of efficacy. Results: Between June 2008 and May 2012, 22 patients were enrolled with a median age 66 years; (range 18–80) and are included in this analysis. Eighteen patients (82%) were stage IV at diagnosis, and 16 (78%) patients had not received prior treatment. At the time of this analysis, 11 patients (50%) completed treatment, and 3 additional patients (14%) remain active. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were reported in 5 (23%) and 4 (18%) patients, respectively. Treatment related Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity included: rash (32%), neuropathy (18%), dehydration (14%), and fatigue (14%). Three patients (14%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity (1 each: septic shock, neuropathy, cardiac ischemia/infarction). Eighteen patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 82% (CR 32%, PR 50%). Of the 16 patients that received no prior treatment, the ORR was 75% (CR 25%, PR 50%). The median FU was 16 months (1–38) months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of all patients for progression-free and overall survival at 18 months are 61% and 79% respectively. Conclusion: The MTD of LEN in combination with BOR and RIT is less than LEN and BOR combinations in multiple myeloma. The three-drug regimen of RIT, BOR, and LEN is feasible in older as well as younger patients with MCL. Given the incidence of neuropathy, subcutaneous or less frequent IV dosing of BOR is worthy of investigation rather than the twice-weekly IV BOR used in this study. Preliminary estimates of efficacy indicate that this regimen is active, and warrants further study. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Off-lable use of Lenalidomide, and Bortezomib in the treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma.


2018 ◽  
Vol 182 (3) ◽  
pp. 404-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preetesh Jain ◽  
Jorge Romaguera ◽  
Samer A. Srour ◽  
Hun J. Lee ◽  
Frederick Hagemeister ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. S65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael (Luhua) Wang ◽  
Hun Lee ◽  
Hubert Chuang ◽  
Nicolaus Wagner-Bartak ◽  
Fredrick Hagemeister ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2719-2719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luhua Wang ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
Sattva Neelapu ◽  
Felipe Samaniego ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2719 Poster Board II-695 Background: Rituximab directly targets CD20 positive lymphoma cells while lenalidomide targets the microenvironment. This combination was proven effective in vitro and in vivo in mantle cell lymphoma (Wu et al, Clin Cancer Res 2008; Zhang et al, Am J Hematol 2009). Clinically, lenalidomide (Habermann et al, Br J Haematol 2009) and rituximab have single-agent activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and may be an effective combination. The goal of our study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in phase 1 and evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in phase 2. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory MCL received lenalidomide on days 1–21 of every 28-day cycle, and rituximab (375 mg/m2) weekly during cycle 1. Dose escalation was used to determine the MTD with lenalidomide (10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25 mg). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic, or grade 4 hematologic adverse events in cycle 1. Phase 2 has reached targeted enrolment with 45 patients treated at MTD. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression free survival rate and response duration. Median time to event in months with 95% confidence interval was calculated. Of 45 patients treated at the MTD, the median age was 66 (46–85), 91% were males. All patients had received prior rituximab and were enrolled regardless of prior rituximab sensitivity or resistance. Results: The median follow-up time for the censored observations was 11.4 months. Two DLTs occurred at 25 mg in phase 1 (hypercalcemia, non-neutropenic fever); therefore, the MTD was 20 mg. The grade 3–4 non-hematologic events included elevated AST, elevated ALT, fatigue, myalgia, tremors, ataxia, cough, deep vein thrombosis, dyspnea, edema (facial), infection, neuropathy sensory, rash, and respiratory failure. Grade 3–4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (37 events), neutropenic fever (4 events), and thrombocytopenia (16 events). There were no responses in patients treated at 10 mg or 15 mg. Thirty six patients (36) were evaluable for response. Nine (9) patients are too early in their treatment and are not yet eligible for response evaluation. Among the 36 evaluable patients, 11 (31%) patients achieved CR, 8 (22%) patients achieved PR, 3 (8%) patients had minor response, 6 (17%) patients had stable disease and 8 (22%) patients had progressive mantle cell lymphoma. The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 53%. Seventy eight (78%) patients achieved stable disease or better and benefited from oral Lenalidomide plus 4 doses of rituximab. The median time to response was 2 months (2–8), and the median duration of response for the 19 patients with CR or PR was 18 months (95% CI: 10.6, NA) (range1–30 months). The median progression free survival for all patients on phase 2 was 14 months (95% CI: 9.8, NA) (ranging from 1–32 months). Conclusion: Oral lenalidomide plus rituximab resulted in durable responses in relapsed/refractory MCL with a favourable toxicity profile. Disclosures: Wang: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hagemeister:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Samaniego:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Yi:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Elan: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bell:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Knight:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zeldis:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Haematologica ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. e203-e206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Zaja ◽  
Simone Ferrero ◽  
Caterina Stelitano ◽  
Angela Ferrari ◽  
Flavia Salvi ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 150-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Martin ◽  
Kristie Blum ◽  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Steven I. Park ◽  
Kami J. Maddocks ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Single-agent ibrutinib confers a response rate of 77%, including a complete response (CR) rate of 19% in patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.6 months and 1-year response duration (RD) rate of 69%, nearly half of all patients experience treatment failure during the first year. We previously demonstrated that prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest induced by the oral, specific CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib can overcome ibrutinib resistance in primary human samples and MCL cell lines with wild-type BTK (Chiron et al. Cancer Discovery 2014). We conducted a phase I trial to evaluate the safety and preliminary activity of palbociclib plus ibrutinib in patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma. Methods Adult patients who were ibrutinib and CDK4/6 inhibitor-naïve who had previously treated MCL were eligible to participate. The primary objective was to estimate the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. Consenting patients were enrolled to one of five dose levels, shown in Table 1. Patients were treated in 28 day cycles, with ibrutinib administered daily and palbociclib administered on days 1-21. (Table 1). Patients could continue to receive study treatment until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Doses were escalated according to a standard phase I 3+3 design. Patients were evaluated for efficacy at the end of cycles 3 and 6, and every 6 cycles thereafter. All CRs, as documented by CT, required confirmation by PET/CT; bone marrow biopsy and endoscopy were also required in patients with known marrow or GI tract involvement, respectively. Additional objectives included pharmacokinetics and evaluation of pretreatment samples for biomarkers of response or resistance. Results From August 2014 to June 2016 a total of 20 patients (15 males, 5 females) were enrolled (DL1 n=3, DL2 n=3, DL3 n=6, DL4 n=3, DL5 n=5). The patients' MIPI risk distribution were 7 low, 7 intermediate, and 6 high. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range 1-5). Six patients were refractory to their last prior therapy. Three patients experienced dose limiting toxicity: One patient treated at DL3 experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting more than 7 days, and grade 3 rash was seen in two patients at DL5. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity included thrombocytopenia (28%), neutropenia (22%), and lymphopenia (17%). Grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity regardless of attribution included one patient with each of the following: lung infection, ALT/AST increase, encephalitis, hyponatremia, sinus tachycardia, pneumonitis. Grade 1-2 adverse events related to treatment and occurring in at least 2 patients included the following: diarrhea (50%), fatigue (44%), rash (39%), bruising (17%), nausea (17%), fever (11%), dyspepsia (11%), and myalgia (11%). Other than the two patients that experienced grade 3 rash at DL5, no patients have required dose reductions; 6 patients required dose interruptions. Thirteen subjects continue on study therapy. The reasons for stopping treatment were disease progression (n=4), adverse event (elevated liver enzymes, n=1; and prolonged cytopenias, n=1), and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (n=1). Of the 18 patients that have had at least one response evaluation to date, 12 (67%) patients responded to treatment and 8 (44%) achieved a CR. The median time to CR was 3 cycles and no responding patients have progressed on study. With a median follow up of 11 months, the estimated 1-year PFS and RD are 68% and 100%, respectively (Figure 1). Conclusions The mechanism-based combination of ibrutinib plus palbociclib is well tolerated and active. Toxicity is primarily related to myelosuppression of grade 1-2 severity, although grade 3 rash was observed at the highest doses evaluated. In this small group of patients, the combination produced responses at all dose levels, with a CR rate of 44% and a median time to CR of 3 months. No responding patients have progressed to date. These preliminary CR, PFS, and RD rates appear better than those reported in other studies of single-agent ibrutinib although the numbers of patients was very small. A phase II multi-center clinical trial to evaluate time to progression is planned. Biomarker studies to evaluate mechanisms of primary resistance are ongoing. Disclosures Martin: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Novartis: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Teva: Research Funding. Ruan:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3661-3661 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Inwards ◽  
Paul Fishkin ◽  
Betsy R. LaPlant ◽  
Matthew T. Drake ◽  
Paul Kurtin ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3661 Objective: We conducted this trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and schedule of temsirolimus added to an established regimen comprised of rituximab and cladribine for the initial treatment of mantle cell lymphoma and to generate preliminary information on the toxicity and efficacy of this combination. Methods: A standard phase I cohort of 3 study design was utilized. MTD was defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least one-third of patients (at least 2 of a maximum of 6 new patients). DLT was defined as grade 4 ANC (<500) for ≥5 days, grade 4 ANC (<500) associated with fever (>100.5 F) and/or active infection, PLT <25,000, grade 4 infection, or ≥grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity during the first cycle of therapy as per NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. The fixed doses of rituximab and cladribine were 375 mg/m2 IV day 1 and 5 mg/m2/d IV days 1–5 of a 28 day cycle, respectively, as previously published. There were 5 planned temsirolimus IV dose levels: 15 mg day 1; 25 mg day 1; 25 mg days 1 and 15; 25 mg days 1,8 and 15; and 25 mg days 1,8,15, and 22. The fifth dose level is as previously published in combination with rituximab. Results: A total of 17 patients were treated: 3 each at dose levels 1–4 and 5 at dose level 5 (25 mg temsirolimus days 1,8,15, and 22). The median age was 75 years (52–86). There were 11 males and 6 females. At presentation 88% had stage IV disease, and 94% had extranodal disease. MIPI scores were low in 6% (1 patient), intermediate in 59% (10 patients), and high in 35% (6 patients). There was a single DLT recorded at dose level 3 based on the initial DLT criteria, though this cytokine release syndrome was clearly rituximab related, and occurred prior to the first dose of temsirolimus. Five patients were treated at the highest planned temsirolimus dose level (25 mg days 1,8,15, and 22) with no DLT observed. No further dose escalation was planned, and this level was determined to be tolerated, though higher levels may be tolerable. All patients were evaluable for adverse events. Hematologic toxicity was frequent, with grade 3 anemia in 12% of patients, grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 35%, grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 30%, grade 4 lymphopenia in 47%, grade 3 neutropenia in 24%, and grade 4 neutropenia in 18% of patients. There were 3 thrombotic episodes, 2 of which were attributed to therapy, and 3 episodes of pneumonitis. The overall response rate was 94% with 53% CR and 41% PR. The median progression free survival was 18.7 months. Conclusions: Temsirolimus 25 mg IV weekly may be safely added to rituximab and cladribine at 375 mg/m2 IV day 1 and 5 mg/m2/d IV days 1–5 of a 28 day cycle, respectively. This regimen had promising preliminary activity in an elderly cohort of patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Temsirolimus for mantle cell lymphoma.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2492-2492
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Lin ◽  
Beth Fischer ◽  
Mollie E. Moran ◽  
David M. Lucas ◽  
Roshini S. Shank ◽  
...  

Abstract The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol was inactive when administered as a 72-hour infusion, but a 1-hr IV bolus dosing schedule demonstrated clinical activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Flavopiridol induces apoptosis via a p53-independent mechanism. Thus, we hypothesized that flavopiridol may eliminate tumor cells resistant to fludarabine and rituximab. We report preliminary results of an ongoing phase I dose escalation study of flavopiridol in combination with fludarabine and rituximab in patients (pts) with MCL, CLL and other indolent B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Pts had adequate marrow function (ANC ≥ 1500, hemoglobin ≥ 9.0, platelets ≥ 100,000), organ function, and performance status (ECOG 0–2) and provided informed consent. Pts in all cohorts received fludarabine 25 mg/m2 IV on days 1–5 and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 28-day cycle. The planned dose escalation of flavopiridol was 50 mg/m2 by 1-hr IV bolus on day 1 (cohort 1), days 1–2 (cohort 2), or days 1–3 (cohort 3) of each cycle. Treatment was for up to 6 cycles, and pts were placed on prophylactic Bactrim and Valtrex. Fifteen pts have been enrolled to date, and 9 pts are evaluable for toxicity and response. Median age of these 9 pts was 67 years (range, 43–72), and 4 pts were male. Pts had the following diagnoses: CLL (5), MCL (2) and follicular lymphoma (FL; 2). Four pts had received 1–2 prior therapies; 5 pts were previously untreated. CLL pts had Rai stage III/IV disease (2) or required treatment for Rai stage I/II disease (3) by NCI 96 criteria. MCL/FL pts were stage III/IV (3) or had progressive stage II disease (1). Three pts were treated in cohort 1; 2 pts completed 6 cycles, but 1 pt was removed from study after cycle 3 due to prolonged cytopenias. Six pts were treated in cohort 2. Two pts developed dose-limiting toxicity; 1 pt developed grade 3 confusion and grade 3 generalized seizures during cycle 2, and 1 pt developed nausea and diarrhea, which resulted in grade 3 acute renal failure. Infectious toxicity was limited to 1 pt who was hospitalized for 48 hrs with a grade 3 upper respiratory infection and febrile neutropenia. Three pts in cohort 2 were removed from study for prolonged cytopenias after 3, 3 and 4 cycles; only 1 pt in cohort 2 completed 6 cycles. Two of the 6 pts in cohort 2 did not receive flavopiridol after cycles 2 and 3, due to life threatening tumor lysis in our single agent flavopiridol study. Response was graded by NCI 96 criteria (CLL) or IWG criteria (MCL/FL). Overall response rate (ORR) was 100%; 7 pts (78%) achieved CR, and 2 pts achieved PR (22%). Two pts relapsed after 7 and 8 months; 7 pts remain in remission a median of 9 (range,7–12) months after therapy. Of note, all 4 MCL/FL pts remain in CR. An ongoing expansion of 12 pts at the cohort 1 dose level is being conducted, to better define toxicity and efficacy; 6 pts have been enrolled to date. In conclusion, flavopiridol, fludarabine and rituximab exhibited significant clinical activity in a small group of pts, with a 78% CR rate. This combination warrants further study, particularly with consideration to an altered flavopiridol schedule using our highly active 30-minute bolus followed by 4-hour infusion regimen.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2569-2569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Goy ◽  
Peggy Ford ◽  
Tatyana Feldman ◽  
Andrew Pecora ◽  
Stuart Goldberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Obatoclax is a small molecule inhibitor of all members of the bcl-2 family of prosurvival proteins which mimics the BH3-only pro-apoptotic proteins of the bcl-2 family. By binding to a hydrophobic groove on the prosurvival bcl-2 proteins (such as bcl-2 and mcl-1), obatoclax releases bax and bak and induces apoptosis. Obatoclax has clinical activity in CLL (O’Brien et al, ASH 2005) with a recommended phase II dose of 28 mg/m2 given over 3 h every 3 weeks with DLT of grade 3 infusional CNS toxicities. Similar toxicities with weekly dosing led to an MTD of 20 mg/m2 weekly (Firozvi et al, ASCO2006). Bortezomib has been shown to be an effective agent in patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) but increases levels of mcl-1, a bcl-2 prosurvival family member. Obatoclax inhibits mcl-1, and in vitro data indicate synergy between obatoclax and bortezomib in MCL cell lines and patient samples (Blood109:4441, 2007). We have completed an ascending dose study evaluating the combination of obatoclax (3 hour IV infusion) and bortezomib (IV push) in patients with MCL. Both obatoclax and bortezomib were administered on days 1, 4, 8, & 11 of 21 day cycles, and up to 8 cycles were administered. Three patients received 30 mg of obatoclax and 1.0 mg/m2 of bortezomib, 3 received 30 mg of obatoclax and 1.3 mg/m2 of bortezomib, and 6 received 45 mg of obatoclax and 1.3 mg/m2 of bortezomib, which was the highest dose evaluated. Efficacy evaluation was performed every 2 cycles, approximately every 6 weeks. Median age was 67 (range 44 – 81), with 7 males. All patients had prior anthracyclines and rituximab, and 5 had previously received bortezomib. In preliminary data on the first 9 patients, adverse events with an overall incidence of ≥25% were thrombocytopenia, abdominal distension, abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, weight loss, dehydration, neuropathy, somnolence, euphoric mood, cough, and rash. The most common grade 3 and grade 4 adverse event was thrombocytopenia (22.2%). Somnolence and euphoric mood resolved soon after the infusion ended. There were no grade 3 or 4 infusional CNS toxicities. Obatoclax 45 mg and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 was determined to be the combination dosage to be used for further evaluation. Using Investigator Reported assessments confirmed by evaluation after 2 additional cycles of treatment, 2 patients in the obatoclax 30 mg/bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 dosage group and 1 patient in the obatoclax 30 mg/bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 dosage group achieved a CR/CRu. Two of these patients had prior high dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplants, and the third had prior bortezomib. Conclusions: Obatoclax and bortezomib (45 mg and 1.3 mg/m2, respectively) administered on days 1, 4, 8, & 11 of a 21 day cycle was found to have acceptable tolerability. Building on pre-clinical data indicating synergy, this study supports a novel twice-weekly administration schedule for obatoclax with bortezomib, and demonstrates initial evidence of efficacy of the combination in heavily-pretreated patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma. Prior Treatment and Response by Dosage Group Dosage Group* Mean # Regimens Prior Bortezomib CR/CRu SD PD Unk^ Total * Obatoclax mg/bortezomib mg/m2 ^ Follow-up ongoing 30/1.0 2 (1–3) 1 2 1 0 0 3 30/1.3 3 (1–7) 1 1 1 1 0 3 45/1.3 2 (1–4) 3 0 2 3 1 6


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (23) ◽  
pp. 2912-2919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Andre Morschhauser ◽  
Guillaume Cartron ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Philippe Solal-Céligny ◽  
Corinne Haioun ◽  
...  

Purpose Obinutuzumab (GA101), a type II, glycoengineered, humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, was superior to rituximab in human diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) xenograft models. In phase I of our study, obinutuzumab (GA101) exhibited encouraging activity but no clear dose-response relationship, and few patients had aggressive histologies. The efficacy and safety of two doses of obinutuzumab (GA101) were explored in our randomized phase II trial in patients with heavily pretreated DBLCL and MCL. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive eight cycles of obinutuzumab (GA101) either as a flat dose of 400 mg for all infusions (days 1 and 8 of cycle 1; day 1 of cycles 2 to 8) or 1,600 mg on days 1 and 8 of cycle 1 and 800 mg on day 1 of cycles 2 to 8. Results Forty patients were enrolled: 21 patients in the 400/400-mg treatment arm (DLBCL, n = 10; MCL, n = 11) and 19 patients in the 1,600/800-mg arm (DLBCL, n = 15; MCL, n = 4). End-of-treatment response was 28% (32% and 24% in the 1,600/800-mg and 400/400-mg study arms, respectively). Best overall response rates were 37% in the 1,600/800-mg arm and 24% in the 400/400-mg study arm (DLBCL, eight [32%] of 25 patients; MCL, four [27%] of 15 patients). Five (20%) of 25 rituximab-refractory patients exhibited treatment response, including four of 12 in the 1,600/800-mg group. The most common adverse events were infusion-related reactions (IRRs), which were manageable. Three patients had grade 3/4 IRRs. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in only one patient. Conclusion Obinutuzumab (GA101) 1,600/800 mg achieves early steady-state concentration and clinical activity with an acceptable safety profile in relapsed/refractory DLBCL and MCL, supporting further exploration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document