Balloon Kyphoplasty Improves Both Roland-Morris Disability Scores and Bone Pain among Cancer Patients with Vertebral Compression Fractures: Interim Analysis of Results from a Phase IV Random Trial

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3695-3695
Author(s):  
James R. Berenson ◽  
John B Tillman ◽  
Mohamad A. Hussein ◽  
Robert Pflugmacher ◽  
Peter Jarzem ◽  
...  

Abstract Destructive vertebral lesions are a common source of morbidity among patients with cancer. Balloon kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive surgical procedure performed for patients with painful vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) with the goal of reducing pain and disability and improving quality of life. We report the results of the first randomized trial among cancer patients with VCFs to assess the efficacy and safety of this procedure. Twenty-one sites in Europe, the United States, Canada and Australia enrolled 134 patients after consent and ethical review board approval. Adult patients diagnosed with a variety of cancers and ≤ 3 painful VCFs (VAS ≥ 4) were randomly assigned to immediate kyphoplasty (N=70) or nonsurgical supportive care (N=64). Patients with primary bone tumors, osteoblastic tumors or solitary plasmacytoma at the fracture site were excluded as well as patients with spinal cord compression. The primary objective was to determine the change in the Roland-Morris Disability questionnaire, a 0- (no disability) to 24-point (maximum disability) instrument validated for assessing back-specific physical functioning, at one month. Back pain was also assessed using a validated 0- (no pain) to 10-point (worst pain imaginable) numerical rating scale. Data from a preplanned interim analysis of this ongoing study are now reported. For pain and function, patients with complete data that has been evaluated through one month are included whereas all enrolled patients were analyzed for safety. Mean patient age was 64 years (range 37 to 88), 58% were female, and tumor types included multiple myeloma (36%), cancers of the breast (20%), lung (8%), prostate (6%) and other sites (30%). At study enrollment, 23% of patients were on daily corticosteroids and 48% had received bisphosphonates within 12 months of study entry. Prior to randomization, single VCFs were identified by the local investigators in 43% of patients; an equal proportion (29%) of patients had 2 or 3 fractures. Among the kyphoplasty and nonsurgical cohorts, 59 and 56 subjects, respectively were evaluable for the efficacy analysis. At baseline, average Roland-Morris scores were similar between the groups; 17.7 and 18.3 points for kyphoplasty and non-surgical-treated patients, respectively. However, at one month, there were marked differences between the two groups with a mean improvement for patients randomized to kyphoplasty of −8.3 points (95% CI −6.2 to −10.5) whereas those receiving non-surgical care showed no significant change (−0.1 points, 95% CI 0.9 to −1.0; p<0.0001 for difference). Mean baseline pain scores were also not different between the two groups (7.2 and 7.3 points for the kyphoplasty and nonsurgical groups, respectively). At one week, kyphoplasty-treated patients showed significant improvement in their back pain (−3.6 points, 95%CI, −2.8 to −4.4) whereas those patients treated non-surgically had no change in their pain (−0.3 points, 95%CI, 0.1 to −0.8; p<0.0001 for difference). Similar results for pain were obtained at one month; kyphoplasty resulted in a −4.1 point change (95%CI, −3.2 to −4.9) and those patients treated non-surgically had no change in their pain (−0.5 points; 95%CI, 0.04 to −1.0; p<0.0001 for difference). There was no significant difference in the number of patients with serious adverse events between the kyphoplasty (16) and nonsurgical (10) groups at one month. None of the serious adverse events in the kyphoplasty group were related to the devices used, including bone cement extravasation; one serious adverse event in the form of an intra-operative non-Q-wave myocardial infarction resolved and was attributed to anesthesia. This randomized study shows, at a pre-planned interim analysis time point, that patients with cancer-related VCFs treated with immediate balloon kyphoplasty show a marked reduction in back disability and pain at one month compared to non-surgical treatment. Pain reduction was also statistically significantly improved within one week postoperatively. Importantly, minimally clinically important differences for the Roland-Morris and pain scales used in this trial have been determined from previous studies and are estimated to be approximately 2.5 and 2.0 points, respectively. Thus, these improvements in disability and pain with balloon kyphoplasty were both statistically and clinically significant and achieved without an increase in adverse events.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2873-2873 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R Berenson ◽  
Robert Pflugmacher ◽  
Peter Jarzem ◽  
Jeffrey A Zonder ◽  
John B Tillman ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2873 Poster Board II-849 Destructive vertebral lesions are a common source of morbidity for patients with cancer. Balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure for patients with painful vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) with the goal of reducing pain and disability. We report the final results of the first randomized trial among cancer patients with VCFs to assess the efficacy and safety of BKP. Twenty-two multinational sites enrolled 134 patients after consent and ethical review board approval. Adult patients diagnosed with cancer and ' 3 painful VCFs were randomly assigned to BKP or nonsurgical management (NSM) and followed for 12 months. Patients were excluded with primary bone tumors, osteoblastic tumors or solitary plasmacytoma at the fracture site, or spinal cord compression. The primary objective was to determine the change in the Roland-Morris Disability questionnaire (RMDQ), a 0- (no disability) to 24-point (maximum disability) instrument validated for assessing back-specific physical functioning, at one month. Following this assessment, cross-over to BKP was allowed in the NSM arm. Patients were randomized to BKP (N=70) or NSM (N=64). Five patients withdrew early from the study without significant baseline data; the 3 patients assigned to BKP did not undergo the procedure. Thus, 68 BKP and 61 control patients were evaluable. Mean patient age was 64 years, 58% were female, and tumor types included multiple myeloma (38%), cancers of the breast (22%), lung (8.5%), prostate (6.2%) and other sites (26%). At baseline, 35% of patients were currently on daily corticosteroids, 50% had received bisphosphonates within 12 months of study entry, 49% had received prior radiation (52 % to the spine), and 67% of patients were previously treated with chemo/hormonal therapies. VCFs were identified in a single (34%), two (26%) or three (40%) sites. Mean baseline RMDQ scores were similar between the groups; 17.6 and 18.2 points for BKP and NSM patients, respectively. However, at one month, there was an improvement for patients randomized to BKP of −8.3 points (95% CI −6.4 to −10.2) whereas those receiving NSM showed no significant change (0.1 points, 95% CI 1.0 to −0.8; p<0.0001). At one week, BKP-treated patients also showed significant improvement in their back pain (−3.8 points, 95%CI, −3.1 to −4.6) whereas those patients treated with NSM had no change (−0.3 points, 95%CI, 0.1 to −0.7; p<0.0001). Similar results for pain were obtained at one month (BKP: −3.9 [95%CI, −3.1 to −4.7]; NSM: −0.6 [95%CI, −0.1 to −1.1]; p<0.0001). The greater pain relief observed in the BKP group was accompanied by a greater reduction in the usage of any analgesics to control pain relief within one month (p=0.002). BKP patients also reported fewer days (compared to NSM) within two weeks where their activity was limited due to back pain (6.3 fewer days per 2 weeks; 95%CI, 5.8 to 6.8; p<0.0001) and greater improvements in quality of life as measured by the SF-36 physical component summary score (8.4 points higher; 95%CI, 7.7 to 9.1; p<0.0001). Thirty-eight of the 61 patients in the NSM group crossed over and underwent BKP with 21 (58%) occurring within 1 week of the 1-month visit. These cross-over patients were also assessed for safety and efficacy at 1 month following the procedure and through the study period. They showed similar benefits in regards to back disability, back pain relief, analgesic use, activity level, and quality of life as those originally assigned to BKP. Among all patients treated with BKP, these improvements were sustained throughout the 12-month study period. Adverse events were similar between the two groups. One serious adverse event in the form of an intra-operative non-Q-wave myocardial infarction resolved and was attributed to anesthesia. One patient with a cement leakage to the disc had an adjacent fracture occur 1 day after the index procedure; the local investigator judged this to be device-related. This randomized study demonstrates that cancer patients with VCFs treated with BKP have a superior outcome compared to NSM as measured by the primary endpoint, the RMDQ score. BKP also resulted in a marked reduction in back pain, improved quality of life and fewer days with limitation of daily activities; these outcomes were both clinically and statistically significant and these effects were maintained throughout the 12 month study period. This study supports the benefits of BKP in the management of cancer patients with VCFs. Disclosures: Berenson: Medtronic Spine LLC: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pflugmacher:Medtronic Spine LLC: Research Funding. Jarzem:Medtronic Spine LLC: Research Funding. Zonder:Medtronic Spine LLC: Research Funding. Tillman:Medtronic Spine LLC: Employment. Ashraf:Medtronic Spine LLC: Employment. Vrionis:Medtronic Spine LLC: Research Funding.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5;16 (5;9) ◽  
pp. E505-E512
Author(s):  
Lucia Otten

Background: Vertebral compression fractures are common among the elderly, which is conditioned by osteoporosis. They cause back pain and limit the patient’s activities. The Kiva® VCF Treatment System is a new device to treat vertebral compression fractures. Compared to other methods, the utilization of the Kiva System reduces the risk for complications and delivers improvements in back pain reduction and functionality. Objectives: Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of the Kiva System in comparison to balloon kyphoplasty on the basis of matched pairs. Methods: 52 patients (47 - 89 years, 68 fractures) were treated with balloon kyphoplasty or with the new Kiva System. Back pain and impairment of motility were assessed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively, with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The operation time and cement extravasation were recorded. Control radiographs were evaluated for new fractures and vertebral heights. Results: Mean VAS values in both groups improved from preoperatively 87.6 ± 12.8 and 83.1 ± 14.9 to 10.8 ± 20.8 and 24.6 ± 11.0 6 months after the treatment. The improvement after 6 months in the Kiva group was significantly better than in the balloon kyphoplasty group (P < 0.0001). Mean ODI scores in both groups also improved from 68.7% ± 15.8% in the Kiva group and 80.6% ± 8.6% in the balloon kyphoplasty group preoperatively to 24.8 ± 18.6% and 33.2 ± 6.3% 6 months after treatment. The mean operation time for the Kiva group was 12.7 ± 3.7 minutes per vertebra and cement leakage occurred in 6 patients. The mean operation time for the balloon kyphoplasty group was 34.1 ± 7.0 minutes per vertebra and cement leakage occurred in 8 patients. Anterior and mid vertebral height in the Kiva group increased from preoperatively 21.06 ± 7.44 mm and 18.36 ± 5.64 mm to postoperatively 22.41 ± 7.14 mm and 20.41 ± 6.00 mm. Anterior and mid vertebral height in the balloon kyphoplasty group increased from preoperatively 21.68 ± 2.06 mm and 21.97 ± 1.78 mm to postoperatively 25.09 ± 2.54 mm and 25.29 ± 2.10 mm. Vertebral height restoration could be therefore maintained with both procedures for 6 months. In the Kiva group 2 cases of nonadjacent fractures and one case of adjacent fractures were observed. In the balloon kyphoplasty group 9 cases of adjacent, as well as 5 cases of nonadjacent, fractures were observed. In the Kiva group significant fewer fractures occurred. Limitations: The study includes only 26 patients for each procedure, which were compared on the basis of matched pairs. Conclusion: The Kiva System appears to be a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. Six months after treatment with the Kiva System, better VAS values than the values after the treatment with balloon kyphoplasty were recorded. Reduction in functional impairment was as successful as it was after balloon kyphoplasty. Vertebral height restoration was observed in both groups, which was sustained for 6 months. The risk of cement extravasation during the Kiva Treatment is nearly the same as in balloon kyphoplasty; however, it requires a shorter operation time and produces fewer new fractures. Key words: Vertebral compression fracture, Kiva, kyphoplasty, vertebral augmentation, osteoporosis, back pain


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 912-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Bazzan ◽  
George Zabrecky ◽  
Nancy Wintering ◽  
Andrew B. Newberg ◽  
Daniel A. Monti

Background. Intravenous ascorbic acid (IV AA) has been used extensively in cancer patients throughout the United States. Currently, there are limited data on the safety and clinical effects of IV AA. The purpose of this study was to expand the current literature using a retrospective analysis of adverse events and symptomatic changes of IV AA in a large sample of cancer patients. Methods. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients receiving IV AA for cancer at the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital over a 7-year period. We assessed all reports of adverse events, laboratory findings, and hospital or emergency department admissions. We also reviewed quality-of-life data, including fatigue, nausea, pain, appetite, and mood. Results. There were 86 patients who received a total of 3034 doses of IV AA ranging from 50 to 150g. In all, 32 patients received only ascorbic acid as part of their cancer management (1197 doses), whereas 54 patients received ascorbic acid in conjunction with chemotherapy (1837 doses). The most common adverse events related to ascorbic acid were temporary nausea and discomfort at the injection site. All events reported in the ascorbic acid alone group were associated with less than 3% of the total number of infusions. Patients, overall, reported improvements in fatigue, pain, and mood while receiving ascorbic acid. Conclusions. The results of this retrospective analysis support the growing evidence that IV AA is generally safe and well tolerated in patients with cancer, and may be useful in symptom management and improving quality of life.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (20;6) ◽  
pp. 521-528
Author(s):  
Douglas P. Beall

Background: The KAST (Kiva Safety and Efficacy) investigation device exempt (IDE) study indicated that the majority of patients responded equally well to vertebral augmentation using either an implantbased approach or balloon kyphoplasty (BK). Additional investigation has suggested that a subset of patients may benefit further by avoiding repeated readmissions due to serious adverse events (SAEs) if they receive one vertebral augmentation approach over another. Objectives: The primary aim was to assess the effect of 2 different augmentation procedures on readmission rates for SAEs. Study Design: The KAST trial is a pivotal, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial conducted to evaluate an implant-based vertebral augmentation approach (implant) against BK. Post-hoc analysis was performed to evaluate SAEs and readmission rates. Setting: Twenty-one sites in North America and Europe. Methods: The treatment effect of vertebral implant versus BK on SAEs requiring unplanned readmission was evaluated by estimating the risk of SAEs associated with readmissions in KAST while controlling for key baseline covariates using multivariate Poisson regression modeling. Results: Forty (27.8%) patients with implants had 69 SAEs associated with readmission compared to 44 (31.2%) patients with BK having 103 events. The risk for all SAEs leading to readmission was 34.4% lower with the implant than for BK (95% confidence interval = 11.1%, 51.7%; P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that the risk of SAEs associated with readmission was decreased in subjects treated with the implant compared to BK, and increased in patients with prior histories of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) or significant osteoporosis. Limitations: The power of the KIVA study was based on clinical efficacy criteria to meet FDA requirements and recommendations for equivalency or noninferiority. The primary endpoint in this posthoc analysis is SAEs associated with readmissions; as a result, the sample size is underpowered, although the results remain significant. Conclusion: The augmentation approaches compared here have similar pain relief and quality of life effects; the implant showed a lower risk of readmissions.


2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. A406 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Olafsson ◽  
J. Mesterton ◽  
J.R. Berenson ◽  
F. Vrionis ◽  
L. Alvares

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Gordon Deen ◽  
Thomas P. Fox

✓ This 25-year-old woman with polyostotic fibrous dysplasia (McCune-Albright syndrome) suffered low-back pain after a minor traumatic injury. Neurological examination demonstrated normal status. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed cystic lesions in multiple thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies, consistent with polyostotic fibrous dysplasia. Severe vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) were seen at T-8 and L-2. Balloon kyphoplasty was performed to treat the T-8 and L-2 VCFs and also prophylactically at T-9 and T-10 to forestall impending fractures at those levels. The patient tolerated the procedures very well and reported complete resolution of back pain. Balloon kyphoplasty may be an option in patients with painful VCFs caused by fibrous dysplasia.


2012 ◽  
Vol 08 (03) ◽  
pp. 144
Author(s):  
Leonard Bastian ◽  

Patients with cancer are at increased risk of painful vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). The Cancer Patient Fracture Evaluation (CAFE) trial was the first randomised controlled study to compare the safety and effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty (BKP – a minimally invasive procedure) with non-surgical fracture management in the treatment of VCFs in patients with cancer. Data from the CAFE trial demonstrated that BKP is a safe and effective treatment option that quickly reduces pain and improves physical function and vertebral body height in patients with cancer and painful VCFs. Data from peer-reviewed published studies support the CAFE trial findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document