Retrospective Database Analysis of the Effect of Zoledronic Acid (ZOL) On Skeletal-Related Events (SREs) in Patients (Patients) with Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3881-3881
Author(s):  
Henry J Henk ◽  
Satyin Kaura ◽  
Jose Ricardo Perez ◽  
Laura Becker

Abstract Abstract 3881 Poster Board III-817 Background For MM patients with malignant bone lesions (BM), SREs including pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia of malignancy, and radiotherapy and/or surgery to bone are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and reduced quality of life. ZOL is an IV bisphosphonate (BP) proven to reduce and delay incidence of SREs in several tumor types. This study was designed to assess the benefit of long-term ZOL use in a real-life setting. Methods Claims-based analysis of commercial and Medicare data from a large US managed care plan and a 45 health-plan database was used to evaluate SRE rates, time from BM to 1st SRE, and mortality in patients treated with ZOL or no IV BP therapy. Patients older than 18 years with MM and BM diagnosed between Jan 2001 and Dec 2006 were included. Treatment Persistency was defined as the absence of a >45 day gap between ZOL administrations. Continuous enrollment in the health plan for 6 months before and no prior evidence of BM or IV BP use were required. When assessing mortality, patients with a date of death less than 30 days following index date were excluded. Patients were followed until they disenrolled from the plan or to the end of the study's follow-up period. In this study, SREs were defined as evidence of pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, and radiotherapy and/or surgery to bone. Results The study sample included 1,655 Patients with a mean age of 61.7 ± 11.9 years; approx. 64% were treated with ZOL and 36% with no IV BP. Incidences of SREs and mortality rates were both greater in the no IV BP group (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.58; p-value<0.001 and mortality rate = 1.71; p-value=0.0234) vs. the ZOL groups. Longer persistency with ZOL was associated with a lower risks of first SRE compared with no IV BP (trend test p-value=0.0025) [TABLE 1]. Conclusions This study showed that in MM Patients with BM, ZOL use was associated with a lower risk of SREs, including fractures, and lower mortality rates. In addition, longer persistence was found to be associated with lower risk of SRE. Disclosures: Kaura: Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Perez:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9518-9518 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Thayer ◽  
J. Cooke ◽  
S. Kaura

9518 Background: For cancer pts with malignant bone lesions (BM), SREs including pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia of malignancy, and radiotherapy and/or surgery to bone are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and reduced quality of life. ZOL is an IV bisphosphonate (BP) proven to reduce and delay incidence of SREs in several tumor types. This study was designed to assess the benefit of long-term ZOL use in a real-life setting. Methods: Claims-based analysis of commercial and Medicare data from a large US managed care plan and a 45 health-plan database was used to evaluate mortality rates, SRE rates, and time from BM to SREs in pts treated with ZOL, pamidronate (PAM), or no IV BP therapy. Pts older than 18 years with solid tumors (breast, prostate, lung, bladder, or renal cell cancers) or MM and BM diagnosed between Jan 2001 and Dec 2006 were included. Continuous enrollment in the health plan for 6 months before the index date and no prior evidence of BM or IV BP use were required. Pts were followed until they left the care plan, switched therapy, or completed the study period. SRE and mortality rates were assessed. Results: The study sample included 28,415 pts with a mean age of 62.5 ± 12.24 years; approx. 25% were treated with ZOL, 8% with PAM, and 67% with no IV BP. Incidences of first and subsequent SREs were higher in the no IV BP group (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 2.27; 95% CI = 2.03, 2.53 and IRR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.24, 1.37, respectively) vs the ZOL/PAM groups. Time to first SRE was delayed by approx. 153 days for ZOL vs no IV BP pts. Overall, pts who had greater persistency with ZOL had lower risks of first SRE compared with no IV BP, the greatest risk reduction being observed in the 12- to 18-month persistency cohort, which experienced > 5-fold risk reduction (IRR = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.11, 0.31). The same persistency cohort also had a 27% lower risk of developing a second SRE (IRR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.62, 0.86) compared with no IV BP. Conclusions: This study showed that in cancer pts with BM, persistence with ZOL resulted in reduced risk of developing first and subsequent SREs. Pts with longer persistence with ZOL achieved better outcomes. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 120-126
Author(s):  
Anil Tibdewal ◽  
Alisha Sharma ◽  
Lavanya Gurram ◽  
Naveen Mummudi ◽  
Jaiprakash Agarwal

Abstract Background Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) secondary to lung cancer (LC) is a debilitating complication associated with poor prognosis and is commonly treated with radiotherapy (RT). There is no consensus for RT dose fractionation in spinal cord compression. Methods Forty consecutive patients of LC with radiological evidence of MESCC treated with palliative RT were evaluated for functional outcomes (pain, ambulation, and sphincter function) at 2-, 4-, and 24-week post RT completion. Pain assessment was done using visual analogue scale (VAS) and response was categorized according to international consensus criteria, ambulation status (AS) using Tomita’s scale, and sphincter function by the presence or absence of a catheter. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Impact of potential prognostic factors on survival was also analyzed and p-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. Results Sixteen, 22, and two patients received 8 Gy single fraction (SF), 20 Gy in five fractions (20/5), and 30 Gy in 10 fractions (30/10), respectively. At 2 weeks, overall response (OR) rates of pain, ambulation, and sphincter control were 73, 81, and 81%, respectively. At 4 and 24 weeks, 93.7, 84.3, 87.5% and 88, 94, 76.5% had OR, respectively. Median OS was 4 months. Six- and 12-months OS was 50 and 37.5%. Nonsignificant difference in OS was seen between SF and 20/5 fractions (median 2.2 vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.39). Age ≤50 years was the only significant factor (p <0.05) in univariate analysis for OS. Conclusion Radiotherapy provided equivalent pain control, ambulation, and sphincter function compared with reported literature in MESCC. Nonsignificant difference in OS exists between SF and multifraction RT regimens.


2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 865-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip G. Colucci ◽  
Andrew D. Schweitzer ◽  
Jad Saab ◽  
Ehud Lavi ◽  
J. Levi Chazen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document