Final Results of the Phase I Study of Lenalidomide In Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL-001 Study)

Abstract Abstract 1376 Introduction: Patients who relapse after fludarabine-based treatments have poor prognosis. These patients have deteriorating immune functions with high infection rates resulting from progressing disease complicated further by ineffective and often immunosuppressive therapies. Two phase II studies in patients with relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) CLL at starting doses of 10 mg or 25 mg daily of lenalidomide (Len) demonstrated promising responses. A phase II/III study was initiated to assess Len 10 mg/d vs 25 mg/d given continuously for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Four cases of serious tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) prompted an independent data monitoring committee to amend the protocol into a phase I trial (de Parseval et al., JCO 2007) Here we present results from this amended study. Methods: Eligible patients had rel/ref CLL, received prior treatment with an alkylating agent and fludarabine, and progressed during or ≤ 12 months after completing fludarabine-based treatment. Primary objective was to determine whether Len 2.5 mg was a safe starting dose and the maximum tolerated dose escalation level (MTDEL). Prophylaxis with allopurinol and hydration were employed as part of an aggressive monitoring plan for TLS prevention. All patients initiated Len at 2.5 mg/d with subsequent dose escalation to 5 mg/d after 28 days with further dose escalations in 5 mg increments performed every 28 days until MTDEL was defined, or the maximum targeted 20 mg/d dose level attained. The first 6 patients at 10, 15 and 20 mg/d dose levels were considered a cohort and could not escalate beyond that dose level for the duration of treatment. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: The redesigned phase I study enrolled 52 patients with a median age of 65 years (range, 37–80) and bulky disease (> 5 cm) in 70%. Cytogenetic data was available for 46 patients, of whom 22 (48%) had high-risk disease: 8 (17%) had del(17p), 12 (26%) had del(11q), 2 had both. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–14); 54% were fludarabine refractory (no-response/relapse ≤ 6 mo), 42% had prior FCR or PCR and 21% had prior alemtuzumab. The TLS prevention strategy resulted in only 2 (3.8%) cases of TLS, both observed at 2.5 mg/d (1 patient with Gr.2 and another with lab TLS). Gr.3/4 tumor flare occurred in 5 (9.6%) patients and was managed with NSAIDs or low-dose steroids. The most common Gr.3/4 adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia (65%) and thrombocytopenia (33%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 4 (8%) patients. Gr.3/4 infections were observed in 21 (40%) patients; 10 (19%) patients developed pneumonia and 3 developed sepsis; 2 cases of sepsis-related death at day 37 and 94 of therapy were also noted but deemed unrelated to study drug by the investigators. Reasons for study discontinuation included disease progression (37%), AEs (29%), consent withdrawal (15%), death (4%), and other reasons (10%). For 16 (31%) patients, 2.5 mg/d was the maximum dose reached and 22 (42%) patients were unable to escalate beyond 5 mg/d. Gr.4 neutropenia was the primary reason for delay in dose escalation. By intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, 6 patients (12%) had a partial response (NCI-WG 1996), 30 patients (58%) had stable disease and 13 patients (25%) progressed; 3 patients were non-evaluable. Median duration of treatment was 3.1 months (range, 0.07–18.4) and the median time to response was 4.3 months (range, 2.8–7.4). Responses were observed at 10 mg/d (n=3), at 15 mg/d (n=1), and at 20 mg/d (n=2); Median PFS (ITT) was 5.5 months and median PFS for responders was 12 months. Three patients still remain on therapy. Conclusion: We conclude that a Len starting dose of 2.5 mg/d appears safe, feasible and can be safely titrated to 20 mg/d (maximum intended dose). The MTDEL was not reached at 20 mg/d. Based on the response rate reported in this study, a higher starting dose, such as previously reported by Chanan-Khan et al (JCO 2006) and Ferrajoli et al (Blood 2008), may be needed to achieve clinical efficacy, particularly for patients with high-risk disease. Adequate TLS prophylaxis and monitoring allows for higher starting doses to be investigated. To identify a safe and clinically active starting dose, the CLL-009 study is evaluating Len at starting doses of 5 mg/d, 10 mg/d, and 15 mg/d in the setting of rel/ref CLL. Disclosures: Wendtner: Celgene, BayerSchering, Roche, Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: off-label use of lenalidomide. Hillmen:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bayer Schering: Consultancy. Mahadevan:Pfizer, millenium, Amgen: Honoraria. Stilgenbauer:Roche, Bayer, Celgene, GSK, Amgen, Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Frankfurt:Bayer, Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kimby:Roche, Bayer-Schering, Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, lecturer. Gobbi:Novartis, Jansen Cilag, Roche, Celgene, Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hurd:Celgene: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ferrajoli:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shah:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Celgene: Employment. Moutouh de Parseval:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Safety, Clinical Activity, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics from a Phase I Study of PF-06863135, a B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA)-CD3 Bispecific Antibody, in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-121805 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1869-1869 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Noopur S. Raje ◽

Andrzej Jakubowiak ◽

Cristina Gasparetto ◽

Robert F. Cornell ◽

Heike I. Krupka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Best Response ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Dose Levels

Introduction: PF-06863135 (PF-3135) is a bispecific, humanized, monoclonal antibody (mAb) consisting of BCMA- and CD3-targeting arms paired on an IgG2a backbone by hinge-mutation technology. PF-3135 binds BCMA+ myeloma cells and CD3+ T cells with affinities of 20 pM and ~40 nM, respectively (Panowski et al. Blood 2016). We report here findings from the dose-escalation portion of an ongoing, multi-center, open-label, phase I study (NCT03269136) of PF-3135 in patients with RRMM. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with RRMM, previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 mAb, received escalating, intravenous (IV) doses of PF-3135, once weekly. Prior BCMA-targeted bispecific T-cell engager or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) treatment was allowed by protocol. Patients had measurable disease per the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) updated criteria 2014. A modified toxicity probability interval method (mTPI), targeting a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of 25% (equivalence interval ± 5%) was used for dose escalation. The primary study objectives are to assess PF-3135 safety and tolerability, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and select the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives include evaluation of anti-myeloma activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of PF-3135. Results: As of April 9, 2019, 17 patients had received once weekly, non-continuous, IV infusion of PF-3135 in 6 dose-escalation groups. The majority were men (71%). The median age was 61 yrs (range, 47-82 yrs) and median disease duration since onset was 7 yrs (range, 1.1-13.3 yrs). Ten (59%) patients had ≥1 chromosomal abnormality and 5 (29%) had a normal karyotype (status not known for 2 [12%] patients). The median number of prior anti-myeloma therapies was 11; 5 (29%) patients had received prior BCMA-targeted therapy. Eight (47%) patients had relapsed MM and 8 (47%) had refractory disease (recurrence type not known for 1 [6%] patient). Ten (59%) patients experienced treatment-related (TR) AEs of any grade. Most TRAEs were grade 1-2, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS, 24%), thrombocytopenia (24%), anemia (18%), and pyrexia (18%). Three (18%) patients had grade 3 TRAEs (increased alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase, leukocytopenia, neutropenia, and lymphopenia). One patient treated at the highest dose level, who had received prior BCMA CART therapy, developed treatment-related febrile neutropenia, a DLT, which may have been related to CRS and borderline/low neutrophil count at baseline. None of the patients had grade 4-5 TRAEs or discontinued treatment due to a TRAE. The median duration of treatment was 4 (range, 2-12) actual dosing days. Sixteen of the 17 patients were evaluable for response. At the time of data cut-off, one (6%) patient had a minimal response and 6 (35%) patients had stable disease (SD) across dose levels, as best response by investigator IMWG assessment; 9 (53%) patients experienced disease progression. The clinical benefit rate (defined as best response ≥SD) was 41% (95% CI: 18.4%, 67.1%). Conclusions: Treatment with IV PF-3135 was well tolerated at the dose levels evaluated. The observed CRS events were moderate and dose-dependent. Additional dose cohorts are accruing. The latest clinical, biomarker, and PK data will be presented for this ongoing study. Disclosures Raje: Medscape: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Jakubowiak:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SkyLineDx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KaryoPharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gasparetto:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed . Cornell:KaryoPharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Krupka:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Navarro:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Forgie:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Udata:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Basu:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chou:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leung:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: PF-06863135, investigational agent

Download Full-text

Data from the First CD20-Targeted Immunotoxin, MT-3724, in a Phase I/Ib Study in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Non-Hodgkin's B-Cell Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4200.4200 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4200-4200 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Paul A Hamlin ◽

Michelle A. Fanale ◽

Steven I. Park ◽

David J. Valacer ◽

Jack Higgins ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Cd20 Antibodies

Abstract Background Novel mechanisms of action (MOA) are needed for the treatment of NHL. Because of the ubiquity and persistence of CD20 expression in B-cell malignancies, there is strong rationale to develop novel MOAs targeting CD20. However, CD20's non-internalizing nature has impeded the development of novel MOAs against this target.. MT-3724 is a recombinant fusion protein consisting of a CD20 binding variable fragment (scFv) fused to the ribosomal inhibitory protein Shiga-like toxin-I A1 subunit (SLT-I A1). Upon scFv binding to surface CD20, SLT-I A1 forces MT-3724 internalization and irreversibly inactivates cell ribosomes triggering cell death. MT-3724 has been shown to specifically bind and kill CD20+ malignant human B-cells in vitro and in in vivo animal models. Data from the first eighteen subjects evaluable for efficacy in the on-going Phase I/Ib monotherapy dose-escalation study of MT-3724 are presented. Methods MT-3724 is being tested in a first-in-human, open label, ascending dose study (3 + 3 design) in cohorts of 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, and 75 mcg/kg/dose. Eligible subjects who previously responded to a CD20 MAb containing therapy followed by relapse/recurrence of NHL receive 6 infusions over 2 hours in the first 12 days of a 28 day cycle (first cycle). With continued safety, tolerability and lack of tumor progression, subjects may receive 4 additional 6-dose cycles (21 days) with tumor assessments after cycles 2, 4 and 5. Dose escalation is based on < 33% dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed during the first 28 day cycle. Results To date, 18 R/R NHL subjects (mean number of prior therapies >4) have enrolled and completed at least one cycle in either the 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, or 75 mcg/kg/dose cohort. Two DLTs were identified in the 100 mcg/kg cohort considered possibly consistent with early signs/symptoms of capillary leak syndrome, a known side effect of immunotoxins. These adverse events (AEs) were non-life threatening and reversible upon drug withdrawal. The most common non-DLT AEs have been reversible hypoproteinemia (≤ Grade 2) with or without transient peripheral edema (≤ Grade 2). A summary of AEs and pharmacodynamic results will be presented. Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) have been observed with MT-3724 but the advent of ADA in subjects has not precluded deepening tumor responses. These data are consistent with the clinical experience of denileukin diftitox, the only approved toxin-based oncology therapeutic. Consistent signs of efficacy including responses were seen in subjects without recent exposure to CD20 antibodies (see table). Conversely, progression by cycle 2 was seen in all subjects who had recent CD20 antibody exposure. CD20 antibodies compete with MT-3724 for target binding and high tissue levels of CD20 antibodies likely inhibit MT-3724 activity. Conclusions Targeting CD20 with antibodies has substantially improved survival in NHL, but unmet need remains and there is strong rationale for agents with new MOAs. MT-3724 is the first CD20 targeted immunotoxin to enter clinic trials. Encouraging clinical activity has been seen; safety, efficacy, PK, and ADA data will be presented. Ribosome inhibition represents a novel mechanism of action for the treatment of R/R NHL and continued development of MT-3724 is warranted. *both Drs. Hamlin and Fanale contributed equally to this work Table Table. Disclosures Hamlin: Molecular Templates: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Xencor: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Fanale:molecular templates: Research Funding. Valacer:Molecular Templates: Employment, Equity Ownership. Higgins:Molecular Templates: Employment, Equity Ownership. Younes:Molecular Templates: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Combined Vorinostat, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Therapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Phase I Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.305.305 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 305-305

Author(s):

David Siegel ◽

Donna M Weber ◽

Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Best Responses

Abstract Abstract 305 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM), the second most common hematologic malignancy, remains incurable despite recent therapeutic advances. Treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory MM is extremely challenging and represents a specific unmet medical need. However, novel treatment combinations have the potential to improve patient outcomes. Vorinostat, an oral inhibitor of Class I and II histone deacetylase enzymes, enhances the anti-MM activity of other pro-apoptotic agents, providing potential synergy in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. This Phase I, multicenter, open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation study evaluated vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Aims: The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD); secondary objectives included overall safety and tolerability, and evaluation of clinical activity. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with relapsed or refractory MM were enrolled sequentially into 1 of 5 escalating dosing levels (Table) using a standard 3+3 design for ≤8 cycles. Patients who were tolerating, and receiving clinical benefit from, the regimen were allowed to continue into the extension phase of the study. In the absence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first cycle, dose escalation continued until the MTD was established. In the event that the MTD was not established, dose level 5 would become the maximum administered dose (MAD) and an additional 8 patients would be enrolled in an expansion cohort to confirm safety. Response to treatment was assessed using modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria with the overall response rate (ORR) defined as minimal or greater, and all adverse events (AEs) recorded. Results: Of 28 patients assessed for safety to date, all have experienced ≥1 AE, with 24 (87.5%) patients experiencing a total of 65 drug-related AEs overall, the majority of which were mild or moderate in severity. The most common drug-related AEs were diarrhea (n=12, 42.9%), fatigue (n=10, 37.5%), neutropenia (n=10, 37.5%), and thrombocytopenia (n=10, 37.5%). A total of 21 serious AEs, 8 of which were identified by the investigator as being related to study treatment, were reported in 13 (46.4%) patients. Three patients discontinued due to AEs. DLT evaluation is complete and there were no DLTs that prohibited dose escalation. One DLT, Grade 3 diarrhea lasting <48 hours, was observed at dose level 5. As per the protocol, this dose level was expanded to 6 patients in total and no further DLTs were observed. Therefore, the MTD has not yet been reached and dose level 5 is the MAD. Of 25 patients evaluable for efficacy, 21 (84%) experienced clinical benefit while on treatment. Best responses to vorinostat combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, defined by modified EBMT criteria, include: 1 complete response (CR), 1 near CR, 2 very good partial responses (VGPR), 8 partial responses (PR), 4 minimal responses (MR), 5 stable disease (SD), and 4 progressive disease (PD), for an ORR of 64%. Twelve of the 13 patients who have received prior lenalidomide therapy were evaluable for response; best responses in these patients included VGPR (n=1), PR (n=3), MR (n=1), SD (n=3); while 4 of these patients progressed. Of the 13 patients who remain on the study, 9 out of 11 (82%) evaluable patients have responded. To date, 10 out of 28 patients have discontinued due to PD. Summary/conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that vorinostat combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone may represent a convenient oral combination therapy that is active and generally well tolerated in the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM. In addition, these results indicate that this combination may exhibit activity in patients who have received prior lenalidomide therapy. The study continues to further characterize the tolerability profile and efficacy of this combination. Disclosures: Siegel: Celegne: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that was approved in the FDA in October 2006 for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. Weber:Milleninum: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding, unpaid advisory board. Mitsiades:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharma Mar: licensing royalties. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Harousseau:Janssen Cilag: Ad Board, Honoraria; Celgene: Ad Board, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Rizvi:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Howe:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reiser:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Byrne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Richardson:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Vorinostat in Combination with Decitabine for the Treatment of Relapsed or Newly Diagnosed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS): A Phase I, Dose-Escalation Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.2089.2089 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 2089-2089 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Mark Kirschbaum ◽

Ivana Gojo ◽

Stuart L. Goldberg ◽

Lisa Kujawski ◽

Ehab Atallah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Sequential Therapy ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Concurrent Therapy ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Experienced Treatment ◽

Refractory Aml

Abstract Abstract 2089 Poster Board II-66 Introduction: Although the introduction of epigenetic therapies, such as the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (DNMT) decitabine, has improved options for the treatment of myeloid malignancies, use is limited by sub-optimal response rates. Therefore, there remains a need for more effective treatment strategies to improve outcomes in AML/MDS. Preclinical and clinical data suggest that broadening epigenetic targeting by adding histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors to DNMTs may improve responses. In addition, it has been reported that outcomes may differ according to the sequence in which HDAC and DNMT inhibitors are combined. Aim: Here we present preliminary data from a Phase I, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalating study, designed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose of the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat combined either concurrently or sequentially with decitabine in patients (pts) with AML/MDS. Other endpoints include tolerability and exploratory assessments of activity. Methods: Pts (≥18 years) with intermediate-high risk MDS, relapsed/refractory AML, or untreated AML (≥60 years; unsuitable for standard chemotherapy), with an ECOG performance status of ≤2, were enrolled into one of six dosing levels (Table) and received treatment for up to 24 months or until disease progression (PD). Results: As of August 3, 2009, 72 pts have entered the study: median age was 68 years (range 18-85) and 58% were male. To date, 69 pts have discontinued due to PD/lack of efficacy (n=37), withdrawal of consent (n=12), adverse events (AEs) (n=16), physician decision (n=3), and protocol deviation (n=1). Of 70 pts evaluable for safety, 69 experienced AEs, the majority of which were Grade 1/2 in severity and included nausea (n=48), diarrhea (n=41), fatigue (n=36), constipation (n=32), and vomiting (n=28). 62 (89%) pts experienced treatment-related AEs and 17 (24%) pts experienced treatment-related serious AEs. 14 deaths occurred during the study, although none were related to study treatment. One dose-limiting toxicity, prolonged QT interval, was documented in dose level 3a. Combinations of vorinostat and decitabine in the schedules in this protocol did not reach MTD. As per protocol, dose levels 3 and 3a were the maximum administered doses and have been expanded. Of the 61 pts evaluable for response, 11 had MDS, 25 had relapsed/refractory AML, and 25 had untreated AML. In pts with MDS receiving concurrent therapy (n=5), complete remission (CR) was achieved in 2 pts, stable disease (SD) in 1 pt, partial remission (PR) in 1 pt, hematologic improvement (HI) in 1 pt; all 6 of the pts who received sequential treatment experienced SD. In pts with relapsed/refractory AML receiving concurrent therapy (n=12), CR was achieved in 1 pt, CR without recovery of counts (CRi) in 1 pt, HI in 1 pt, SD in 6 pts, while 3 pts had PD; in those receiving sequential therapy (n=13), SD was achieved in 9 pts while 4 had PD. In pts with untreated AML receiving concurrent therapy (n=12), CR was achieved in 4 pts, CRi in 1 pt, PR in 1 pt, and SD in 6 pts, and in those receiving sequential therapy (n=13), CR was achieved in 2 pts, CRi in 2 pts, PR in 1 pt, HI in 2 pts, and SD in 5 pts. Overall, CR or CRi was achieved by 18% pts with MDS, 8% with relapsed/refractory AML, and 36% with untreated AML; and HI was reported in 9% pts with MDS, 4% with relapsed/refractory AML, and 8% with untreated AML. Conclusion: These preliminary data indicate that the combination of vorinostat with decitabine, either concurrently or sequentially, is possible without significant toxicity. In addition, the combination shows promising activity in MDS and untreated AML. Disclosures: Kirschbaum: Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celegene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that was approved in the FDA in October 2006 for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. Goldberg:Merck: Research Funding. Marks:Merck: Research Funding. Di Gravio:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pyle:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rizvi:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Issa:Eisai: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celegene: Research Funding; MGI Pharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

First-in-Human, Phase 1/2 Trial to Assess the Safety and Clinical Activity of Subcutaneous GEN3013 (DuoBody®-CD3×CD20) in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-121460 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 758-758 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Pieternella Lugtenburg ◽

Rogier Mous ◽

Michael Roost Clausen ◽

Martine E.D. Chamuleau ◽

Peter Johnson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

B Cells ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Introduction: CD20-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL); however, a significant proportion of patients (pts) present with refractory disease or will experience relapse. GEN3013 (DuoBody®-CD3×CD20) is the first subcutaneously administered IgG1 bispecific antibody (bsAb) that targets the T-cell surface antigen CD3 and the B-cell surface antigen CD20, triggering T-cell-mediated killing of B cells. In vitro, GEN3013 efficiently activates and induces cytotoxic activity of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the presence of B cells (Hiemstra et al. Blood 2018), and results in long-lasting depletion of B cells in cynomolgus monkeys. Subcutaneous (SC) GEN3013 in cynomolgus monkeys resulted in lower plasma cytokine levels, and similar bioavailability and B-cell depletion, compared with intravenous administration. GEN3013 has higher potency in vitro than most other CD3×CD20 bsAbs in clinical development (Hiemstra et al. HemaSphere 2019). SC GEN3013 in pts with B-NHL is being evaluated in a first-in-human, Phase 1/2 trial (NCT03625037), which comprises a dose-escalation part and a dose-expansion part. Here we report preliminary dose-escalation data. Methods: Pts with CD20+ B-NHL with relapsed, progressive, or refractory disease following anti-CD20 mAb treatment, and ECOG PS 0-2 were included. During dose escalation, pts received SC GEN3013 flat dose in 28-day cycles (q1w: cycle 1-2; q2w: cycle 3-6; q4w thereafter) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was mitigated with the use of a priming dose and premedication with corticosteroids, antihistamines, and antipyretics. Primary endpoints were adverse events (AEs) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity (anti-drug antibodies [ADA]), pharmacodynamics (PD) (cytokine measures; laboratory parameters), and anti-tumor activity (tumor size reduction; objective and best response). Results: At data cut-off (June 28, 2019), 18 pts were enrolled into the dose-escalation part of the trial, with safety data available for pts receiving doses starting at 4 µg. Most pts had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n=14) and were heavily pre-treated; 10 pts had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy (overall median [range]: 3 [1-11]). The median age was 58.5 years (range: 21-80), and 13 pts were male. At a median follow-up of 1.9 months, pts received a median of 5 doses (range: 1-14); treatment is ongoing in 6 pts. Twelve pts discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. Six pts died (2 during treatment, 4 during survival follow-up), all due to disease progression and unrelated to treatment. The most common (n≥5) treatment-emergent AEs were pyrexia (n=8), local injection-site reactions (n=7), diarrhea (n=5), fatigue (n=5), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=5). The most common Grade (G) 3/4 AEs were anemia (n=3) and neutropenia (n=3). Despite increasing GEN3013 doses, all CRS events were non-severe (initial observation: 3/8 pts, G1: n=1, G2: n=2; following modification of premedication plan [corticosteroids for 3 days]: 6/10 pts, G1: n=4, G2: n=2). Increases in peripheral cytokine (IL6, IL8, IL10, IFNγ, TNFα) concentrations after GEN3013 dosing correlated with clinical symptoms of CRS in most pts. No pts had tumor lysis syndrome or neurological symptoms. No DLTs were observed. GEN3013 PK profiles reflect SC dosing; Cmax occurred 2-4 days after dosing. No ADAs were detected. PD effects following GEN3013 dosing were observed at dose levels as low as 40 µg and included rapid, complete depletion of circulating B cells (if present after prior anti-CD20 therapy) and peripheral T-cell activation and expansion. The first evidence of clinical activity was observed at a dose level of 120 µg, with complete metabolic response observed in a pt with DLBCL. Conclusions: Subcutaneously administered GEN3013, a potent CD3×CD20 bsAb, shows good tolerability and early evidence of clinical activity at low dose levels in heavily pretreated pts with relapsed or refractory B-NHL. All CRS events were non-severe and did not lead to discontinuation. No DLTs were observed. Dose escalation is ongoing; updated data will be presented. Dose expansion will begin upon determining the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) (NCT03625037). Disclosures Lugtenburg: Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Mous:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Clausen:Abbvie: Other: Travel grant to attend ASH 2019. Johnson:Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Genmab: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Rule:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Napp: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy. Oliveri:Genmab: Employment, Equity Ownership. DeMarco:Genmab: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hiemstra:Genmab: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Warrants. Chen:Genmab: Employment. Azaryan:Genmab: Employment. Gupta:Genmab: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ahmadi:Genmab Inc: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Hutchings:Incyte: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I Trial of Targeted Alpha-Particle Therapy Using Actinium-225 (225Ac)-Lintuzumab (Anti-CD33) in Combination with Low-Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) for Older Patients with Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.5293.5293 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 5293-5293 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Joseph G Jurcic ◽

Farhad Ravandi ◽

John M. Pagel ◽

Jae H Park ◽

B. Douglas Smith ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Particle Therapy ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Molecular Abnormalities ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Lintuzumab, a humanized anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody, targets myeloid leukemia cells but has only modest activity in AML. To increase the antibody’s potency yet avoid nonspecific cytotoxicity of β-emitting isotopes, 225Ac (t½=10 d), a radiometal that yields 4 α-particles, was conjugated to lintuzumab. A phase I trial showed that 225Ac-lintuzumab is safe at doses ≤ 3 µCi/kg and has anti-leukemic activity across all dose levels studied (Jurcic et al. ASH, 2011). We are conducting a multicenter, phase I dose-escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and biological activity of fractionated-dose 225Ac-lintuzumab in combination with LDAC. Patients and Methods: Patients ≥ 60 yrs who had untreated AML with poor prognostic factors, e.g., an antecedent hematologic disorder, unfavorable cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities, and significant comorbidities, were eligible. Patients received LDAC 20 mg twice daily for 10 d every 4-6 wks for up to 12 cycles. During Cycle 1, beginning 4-7 days after completion of LDAC, two doses of 225Ac-lintuzumab were given approximately one week apart. To prevent radiation-induced nephrotoxicity, patients were given furosemide while receiving 225Ac-lintuzumab and spironolactone for one year afterward. Results: Nine patients (median age, 76 yrs; range, 73-81 yrs) were treated. Seven patients (78%) had a history of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), for which five (56%) received prior therapy with hypomethylating agents (n=4) or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (n=1). One patient (11%) had chronic myeloid leukemia in a molecularly undetectable state at the time of AML diagnosis. Six patients (67%) had intermediate-risk cytogenetics, and three (33%) had unfavorable cytogenetics. The median CD33 expression was 76% (range, 45-100%). Patients received 225Ac-lintuzumab at doses of 0.5 (n=3) or 1 (n=6) μCi/kg/fraction. Total administered activity ranged from 68-199 μCi. The median number of cycles administered was 2 (range, 1-4). Dose-limiting toxicity was seen in one patient receiving 1 µCi/kg/fraction who had grade 4 thrombocytopenia with bone marrow aplasia persisting > 6 wks after receiving 225Ac-lintuzumab. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia (n=1) and thrombocytopenia (n=3). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included febrile neutropenia (n=6), pneumonia (n=2), bacteremia (n=1), cellulitis (n=1), transient increase in creatinine (n=1), hypokalemia (n=1), and generalized weakness (n=1). Bone marrow blast reductions were seen in 5 of 7 patients (71%) evaluated after Cycle 1. Mean blast reduction was 61% (range, 34-100%). Three of the 7 patients (43%) had marrow blast reductions of ≥ 50%; however, no remissions were observed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.5 mos (range, 1.7-15.7+ mos). Median overall survival (OS) from study entry was 5.4 mos (range, 2.2-24 mos). For the 7 patients with prior MDS, median OS was 9.1 mos (range 2.3-24 mos). Conclusions: Fractionated-dose 225Ac-linutuzmab in combination with LDAC is feasible, safe, and has anti-leukemic activity. Dose escalation continues to define the MTD, with planned doses up to 2 µCi/kg/fraction. Additional patients will be treated at the MTD in the phase II portion of this trial to determine response rate, PFS, and OS. Disclosures Ravandi: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Pagel:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Park:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Wahl:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Earle:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cicic:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Scheinberg:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Dose-Response Analyses Of Momelotinib (CYT387), a JAK1 and JAK2 Inhibitor, From a Phase I/II Study (CCL09101) In Treatment Of Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1590.1590 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1590-1590 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Yan Xin ◽

Lixin Shao ◽

Wei Deng ◽

Demi Niforos ◽

Mark Kowalski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Response Rate ◽

Average Daily Dose ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Dose Escalation Study ◽

Flat Dose ◽

Starting Dose ◽

Daily Dose ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Momelotinib (MMB, previously CYT387) is a selective small molecule inhibitor of JAK 1 and JAK 2 currently under investigation for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF). Study CCL09101 is a Phase I/II, open-label, dose-escalation study of oral MMB in MF subjects. Following an initial dose escalation phase, subjects were assigned to 150 mg once-daily (QD), 300 mg QD or 150 mg twice-daily (BID) MMB capsules, in a 9 month (mos) dose expansion phase. The safety and tolerability of MMB, based on assigned dose, was previously reported with a maximum tolerated dose of 300 mg QD and dose limiting toxicities of elevated lipase and headache at 400 mg QD. Clinical efficacy included spleen response rate of 37% based on IWG criteria and suggested improvement in anemia related endpoints. As the study allowed intra-subject dose adjustments for tolerability, additional analyses based on average daily dose administered were performed. In a subset of patients, pharmacokinetics (PK) was assessed. Methods Dose-efficacy analyses were conducted using the average daily dose received over 6 mos for spleen response and 9 mos for transfusion (txn) independence response. Subjects were grouped based on tertiles of average daily dose < 200 mg, 200 to < 300 mg, > 300 mg. Spleen response at 6 mos required a ≥ 50% reduction in palpable splenomegaly. Txn response required maintaining transfusion independence for ≥12 weeks (wks) for subjects who were txn dependent at baseline and completed ≥ 12 wks on study. The incidence of hgb and platelet (plt) decline was also analyzed as a function of average daily dose received over 6 mos. Subjects evaluated for hgb decline were txn independent with hgb ≥ 8 g/dL at baseline. Hgb decline was defined as the incidence of hgb < 8 g/dL and at least a 1 g/dL decrease compared to baseline. Subjects evaluated for plt decline had baseline platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L. Plt count decline was defined as the incidence of plt count < 100 x 109 /L and ≥ 50 x 109/L decrease compared to baseline at any point during the 6 mos. In the PK subset, dose-exposure relationship was explored. Results Spleen response rates were comparable across MMB average daily dose tertiles, indicating a relatively flat dose-efficacy relationship. A trend towards a higher txn response was observed at the highest MMB average daily dose. No dose dependent increase in hgb or plt decline was noted across average daily dose tertiles. 60 subjects (41%) reported peripheral neuropathy as an adverse event during the 9 mos study; 92% grade 1, 8% grade 2. Incidence was comparable across average daily dose tertiles (see table). In the PK subset of subjects, MMB exposures were generally dose proportional between 150 mg QD and 300 mg QD (mean AUCtau: 2114 and 4424 h×ng/ml, respectively; steady state Cmax: 339 and 660 ng/ml, respectively) with limited data from the other dose levels (n ≤ 5). Of subjects receiving 300 mg total daily starting dose, > 60% of subjects maintained this dose level throughout the study; > 75% of subjects had an average daily dose of ∼250 mg to 280 mg (following 300 mg QD or 150 mg BID dosing, respectively), and the median average daily dose was 300 mg, suggesting 300 mg QD was well tolerated. Conclusion No relationships were observed between average daily doses of MMB vs clinically relevant endpoints of spleen response rate or plt count decline compared to baseline. There was a suggested trend, albeit with limited sample size, towards improved anemia-related endpoints at MMB dose ≥ 300 mg QD. Analyses suggest no need to adjust dose based on baseline plt count. In conjunction with the previously reported primary endpoints of safety and efficacy, these analyses support selection of the 300 mg QD capsule formulation as the starting dose for all subjects in the planned Phase 3 study. Disclosures: Xin: Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shao:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Deng:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Niforos:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Kowalski:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Bavisotto:YM Biosciences: Consultancy. Kawashima:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Jun:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Collins:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ramanathan:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

A Phase I/II Study of AZD2811 Nanoparticles (NP) As Monotherapy or in Combination in Treatment-Naïve or Relapsed/Refractory AML/MDS Patients Not Eligible for Intensive Induction Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130635 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3919-3919

Author(s):

William B. Donnellan ◽

Ehab L. Atallah ◽

Adam S. Asch ◽

Manish R. Patel ◽

Jay Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Slow Release ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment Naïve ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Refractory Aml

Background: Aurora kinases (AurK) represent potential targets for anticancer therapy in hematological malignancies and solid tumors. AurK B inhibitor AZD1152 (barasertib) showed benefit (35% CR/CRi) in patients (pts) with untreated AML when given as a 7-day continuous infusion (Lowenberg B et al, Blood 2011, Kantarjian HG et al., Cancer 2013). AZD2811NP, a nanoparticle encapsulated slow-release inhibitor of AurKB, when given as 2-4hr IV on days 1 and 4, offers a prolonged drug exposure in vivo, mimicking the AZD1152 7-day continuous IV infusion. This is an update on the first-in-man dose-escalation study of AZD2811NP in pts with relapsed/refractory AML/MDS or treatment-naïve patients (pts) not eligible for intensive induction therapy (NCT03217838). The primary objectives are to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and safety profile of AZD2811NP monotherapy and in combination with azacitidine. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, Biologically Effective Dose (BED), and preliminary efficacy (CR, CRi, PR, 6 month OS). Methods: Pts received a 2-hour IV infusion on Day 1 and 4 of each 28-day cycle (Cy) for doses up to 600mg, extending to a 4 h IV infusion for dosages > 600 mg. In the ongoing dose escalation, 3-6 pts have been sequentially enrolled in cohorts ranging from 100 mg to 800 mg per infusion (Day 1 & 4), i.e. from 200 mg to 1,600 mg per cycle in monotherapy setting, according to a modified continuous reassessment method (mCRM) dose escalation design. AZD2811NP was also combined with azacitidine (75 mg day 1 to 7 or the 5-2-2 schedule) starting at an AZD2811NP dose of 400 mg D1 and D4 every 4 weeks. Study treatment was continued until disease progression, intolerability, or when discontinuation criteria were met. Results: Currently, 30 pts have enrolled of which 29 pts (12 females and 17 males) received study treatment in 5 monotherapy cohorts and 2 azacitidine combination cohorts, with ages ranging from 53 to 85 years. Nineteen pts had relapsed/refractory AML, 9 pts had MDS and 1pt had MDS/MPN. Monotherapy cohort 5 (800 mg D1 & D4) and combination cohort 4c (600mg D1 & D4 + Azacitidine) are currently enrolling. Of the 19 pts in monotherapy cohorts 1-5, 18 pts discontinued (due to consent withdrawal [2], early disease related deaths [2], other reason [1], or completed follow up [13; 11 pts after Cy1, 2 pts after Cy2]) and 1 pt is still on therapy. Nine pts were treated in combination with azacitidine, and of these, 3 pts are still on therapy and 6 pts have discontinued AZD2811NP (due to death [1], consent withdrawal [2], or completed follow up [3; 2 pts after Cy2, 1 pt after Cy4]). Adverse events that occurred in ≥ 20% of pts were mainly myelotoxicity, nausea and fatigue. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) has been observed in the monotherapy arm (esophageal infection) and one DLT in the combination setting (late neutropenia recovery). Two deaths were due to the underlying disease and 1 due to a serious adverse event of Gr 5 sepsis not related to study drug. AZD2811 total and released blood PK exposure appears broadly dose proportional with a terminal t1/2 of ~ 30-50 hours. Released blood PK exposure is ~ 1% of total PK exposure. Conclusion: AZD2811NP is documented to be well tolerated at doses up to 600 mg on Day 1 & 4 every 28 days in monotherapy setting and up to 400 mg (D1 & 4) in combination with azacitidine. The monotherapy and combination therapy dose escalations are ongoing. Updated results including preliminary efficacy data will be presented. Additional dose finding and expansion cohorts of AZD2811NP in combination with venetoclax are planned. Disclosures Atallah: Pfizer: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. Yang:AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy. Eghtedar:Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Borthakur:Merck: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Cantargia AB: Research Funding; FTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argenx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Xbiotech USA: Research Funding; Arvinas: Research Funding; Polaris: Research Funding; Strategia Therapeutics: Research Funding; Tetralogic Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Agensys: Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare AG: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Co.: Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; NKarta: Consultancy; BioLine Rx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BioTheryX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoceutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Charlton:AstraZeneca: Employment; GSK: Equity Ownership. MacDonald:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Korzeniowska:AstraZeneca: Employment. Sainsbury:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Strickland:Sarah Cannon Development Innovations: Employment. Overend:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Adelman:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fabbri:AstraZeneca: Employment. Travers:AstraZeneca: Employment. Smith:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pease:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cosaert:AstraZeneca: Employment. OffLabel Disclosure: AZD2811NP, a nanoparticle encapsulated slow-release inhibitor of Aurora Kinase B (AurKB), is an investigational agent in clinical trials for human cancers including AML/MDS.

Download Full-text

Phase 2 Study of Venetoclax Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117026 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 303-303 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Luciano J Costa ◽

Edward A. Stadtmauer ◽

Gareth Morgan ◽

Gregory Monohan ◽

Tibor Kovacsovics ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Plasma Concentration ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Venetoclax (Ven), an oral agent that targets the antiapoptotic protein, BCL-2, has demonstrated efficacy, as monotherapy and combined with proteasome inhibitor (PI) bortezomib, in relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM). We report preliminary safety and efficacy data for Ven combined with the second generation PI carfilzomib (K) and dexamethasone (VenKd) in R/R MM. Methods: In this ongoing phase 2, dose escalation study (NCT02899052), patients with R/R MM and no prior K exposure received VenKd on 28-d cycles in 4 dose finding and one expansion cohorts: Ven 400 mg/day + K 27 mg/m2 Day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 + dex 40 mg Day 1, 8, 15, 22 (Cohort 1), same regimen but with Ven 800 mg/day (Cohort 2), Ven 800 mg/day + K 70 mg/m2 Day 1, 8, 15 + dex 40 mg Day 1, 8, 15, 22 (Cohort 3/expansion cohort), or Ven 800 mg + K 56 mg/m2 Day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 + dex 40 mg Day 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, 23 (Cohort 4). Treatment continued until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Results: As of June 11, 2018, 42 patients were enrolled. The median age was 66.5 years (min, max: 37, 79), 63% had ISS II/III disease, and 8 patients (19%) had t(11;14). Patients received a median of 2 prior therapies (range: 1 - 3), 93% had received prior PI (50% refractory), 62% were refractory to immunomodulatory therapies, and 33% double refractory. At the data cut off, 29 patients were still active and had completed ≥2 cycles and 13 patients discontinued with the primary reason being disease progression (n=4), death (n=3), physician decision (n=2), withdrawal of consent (n=2), lack of efficacy (n=1), and AE (n=1). All patients experienced at least one AE, and grade 3/4 AEs experienced by >10% of subjects included: decreased lymphocyte count (26%), decreased neutrophil count (14%), and hypertension (12%). Thirteen subjects experienced at least one serious AE. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached and Ven 800 mg/day + K 70 mg/m2 was selected for expansion. Ven mean (% coefficient of variation) maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours (AUC24) on Cycle 1 Day 15 were 2.7 (57) mg/mL and 33.1 (54) mg×h/mL, respectively, at 400 mg venetoclax (n=4); and were 2.42 (53) mg/mL and 38.7 (51) mg×h/mL, respectively, at 800 mg venetoclax (n=13) in the dose escalation cohorts. The overall response rate (ORR) was 78% and the very good partial response (VGPR) or better rate was 56% (Table). Median time from first dose to the data cut or discontinuation was 5.7 months (range: 0.9 - 16.3) and the median time to first response was 1.9 months (95% CI: 0.9, 9.2). ORRs for subgroups of interest are reported in the Table. Conclusions: The combination of VenKd appears tolerable with no new safety signals or changes in Ven pharmacokinetics. VenKd shows promising preliminary efficacy in R/R MM patient subgroups. Response rates were comparable in all high risk subgroups and overall population. However, the subset of patients with t(11;14) had the highest response. Overall, these results demonstrate that VenKd is a safe and efficacious regimen in R/R MM and support the continued study of VenKd. Disclosures Costa: Abbvie: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Stadtmauer:Celgene: Consultancy; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Morgan:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kovacsovics:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Jakubowiak:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; SkylineDx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kaufman:Roche: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Other: data monitoring committee; Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Mobasher:Genentech Inc: Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Other: Ownership interests non-PLC. Freise:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ross:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pesko:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Munasinghe:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gudipati:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mudd:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bueno:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kumar:Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Ivosidenib (AG-120) Induced Durable Remissions and Transfusion Independence in Patients with IDH1-Mutant Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Results from a Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Expansion Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111264 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1812-1812 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Courtney D. DiNardo ◽

Justin M. Watts ◽

Eytan M. Stein ◽

Stephane de Botton ◽

Amir T. Fathi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Transfusion Independence ◽

Starting Dose ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Advisory Role

Abstract BACKGROUND: Recurrent mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) are observed in approximately 4% of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and have been linked with increased transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Ivosidenib (AG-120), an oral, potent, targeted, small-molecule inhibitor of the mutant IDH1 protein (mIDH1), is a therapeutic candidate for the treatment of patients with mIDH1 MDS. Through inhibition of mIDH1, ivosidenib suppresses the production of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), leading to clinical responses via differentiation of malignant cells. AIM: To report safety and efficacy data from patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) MDS enrolled in the first-in-human, phase 1, dose escalation and expansion study of ivosidenib in patients with mIDH1 advanced hematologic malignancies (NCT02074839). METHODS: This ongoing study is evaluating the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of ivosidenib. Trial enrollment was completed on 08May2017. In dose escalation, patients received single-agent ivosidenib orally once daily (QD) or twice daily in 28-day cycles. The MTD was not reached and 500 mg QD was selected as the dose to be tested in expansion. Expansion Arm 3 enrolled patients with mIDH1 advanced hematologic malignancies, including MDS. The overall response rate (ORR) for MDS was defined as complete remission (CR) + partial remission + marrow CR. Exploratory biomarker assessments included baseline co-occurring mutations (next-generation sequencing panel for hematologic malignancies) and mIDH1 variant allele frequency (VAF) in bone marrow mononuclear cells (BEAMing Digital PCR; lower limit of detection for mIDH1, 0.02-0.04%). Here, we present safety and efficacy data for patients with MDS in expansion Arm 3 and in dose escalation whose starting dose was 500 mg QD. RESULTS: In all, 258 patients (78 in dose escalation, 180 in expansion) received ivosidenib, including 12 patients with MDS (9 from expansion and 3 from escalation) whose starting dose was 500 mg QD. Baseline characteristics for these 12 patients were: 9 men/3 women; median age, 72.5 years (range, 52-78) and 42% were ≥75 years of age; median number of prior therapies, 1 (range, 1-3). As of 10Nov2017, 7 of 12 (58.3%) patients remained on treatment and 5 (41.7%) had discontinued (one for allogeneic stem cell transplantation). The median duration of exposure to ivosidenib was 11.0 months (range, 3.3-31.1). The most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade, irrespective of causality, occurring in ≥20% of the 12 patients were back pain (n=4, 33.3%) and anemia, decreased appetite, diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, hypokalemia, pruritus, and rash (n=3, 25.0% each). The majority of these AEs were grade 1-2 and reported as unrelated to treatment. No AEs led to permanent discontinuation of treatment. IDH differentiation syndrome (IDH-DS) was observed in 2 of 12 (16.7%) patients; the events were grade 1 and 2, respectively. Of the 12 patients with MDS receiving ivosidenib 500 mg QD, 5 achieved CR (41.7%; 95% CI 15.2%, 72.3%) and 6 achieved marrow CR (50.0%), resulting in an ORR of 91.7% (95% CI 61.5%, 99.8%). The median durations of CR and overall response were not estimable at the time of the data cutoff. The percentages of patients who remained in CR and response at 12 months were 60.0% and 61.4%, respectively. Among 5 patients who were transfusion dependent at baseline, 4 became transfusion independent for at least 56 days on treatment. Baseline co-occurring mutations and changes in mIDH1 VAF levels on ivosidenib therapy will be presented. CONCLUSION: In patients with mIDH1 R/R MDS, ivosidenib monotherapy was well tolerated and induced durable remissions and transfusion independence. These findings support the role of ivosidenib as an effective, oral, targeted treatment for patients with mIDH1 R/R MDS. Disclosures DiNardo: Karyopharm: Other: Advisory role; Medimmune: Other: Advisory role; Celgene: Other: Advisory role; Bayer: Other: Advisory role; Agios: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role. Watts:Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding. Stein:Celgene: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. de Botton:Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Fathi:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. Stein:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Foran:Agios: Research Funding; Xencor, Inc.: Research Funding. Stone:AbbVie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cornerstone: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Fujifilm: Consultancy; Sumitomo: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board, Steering Committee; Ono: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Arog: Consultancy, Research Funding; Argenx: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Amgen: Consultancy. Patel:France Foundation: Honoraria; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Tallman:Cellerant: Research Funding; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; AROG: Research Funding; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board. Choe:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dai:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fan:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yen:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kapsalis:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hickman:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Agresta:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Attar:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text