Fludarabine Plus Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab In Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Results In 55 Patients

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1757-1757
Author(s):  
Véronique Leblond ◽  
Laetitia Compain ◽  
Vincent Levy ◽  
Jérôme Tamburini ◽  
Alain Delmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Delayed Responses

Abstract Abstract 1757 Treatment of Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia relies on alkylator agents, nucleoside analogs and/or monoclonal antibody based therapies. We showed previously that combination of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide yields a 78% response rate (RR). We performed a retrospective study in 55 WM patients (pts) treated with RFC regimen in 10 French centers. The median age was 65 years (range: 34–79), the median IgM level measured by electrophoresis was 27.3 g/L (range: 6.5–64), the median haemoglobin level was 9.7g/dl (range: 3.7–14), the median platelet count was 174 × 109/L (range: 22–500), the median beta 2 microglobulin level was 3.4 mg/l (range: 1.7–9). In all, 40/55 pts had previously been treated with a median of 2 lines of therapy (range: 1–4), including 24 patients with relapsed disease and 16 patients with refractory disease. RFC regimen was given every 4 weeks and consisted in: Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV Day 1, Fludarabine 40 mg/m2 per os Day 1 to Day 3, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 per os Day 1 to Day 3. 55 pts received the first cycle of RFC, and 52 received two or more cycles (median of 4 cycles, range 2–6). Main toxicity was hematological. No toxic death was observed.Response was assessed 3 months after the last RFC cycle according to response criteria agreed by the 3rd International Workshop on WM (Kimby, 2006), but delayed responses with improvement of the response occurring more than 3 months after treatment discontinuation were observed in 15 patients. The best response was evaluated in 51 pts (3 early discontinuation treatments, one progressive disease), including 26 partial responses (PR), 5 minor responses (MR), and 2 stable diseases (SD). Of note 18 very good PR/ near RC (VGPR) were observed (> 90% decrease in M-protein) . The overall response rate was 89%. Long lasting cytopenia was observed in 10 patients. In the untreated group one pt in failure had a Burkitt-like lymphoma, the other 14 pts are alive in response. In the previously treated group, 6 pts relapsed, one developed a large B-cell lymphoma. Three ASCT and 4 allogeneic SCT were performed in six patients. With a median follow-up time of 28 months, median time to treatment failure (TTF) was not reached, even in previously treated patients. There was not significant difference in the TTF duration in patients in VGPR compared with those in PR + MR.The median progression free survival time was not reached. Myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML) was observed in two heavily treated patients and 3 pts had a secondary solid cancer. In all, 48 pts are alive, 7 patients died (4 from progressive disease, 2 from secondary cancer, and 1 from Burkitt-like transformation). Conclusion: RFC combination even in heavily treated patients with poor prognostic factors gives a very high response rate (89%) with 33% of patients achieving at least a very good partial response with acceptable toxicity. The toxicity on the hematopoietic stem cell reservoir is a major concern. This combination could be offered to relapsed/refractory patients. In first line, the choice of this combination must be discuss, increased incidence of MDS/ AML after purine analogs, and impairment of stem cell mobilization having previously been reported by us and others. Because frequent delayed responses, a long follow-up with periodic electrophoresis is needed to assess the best response after RFC. Disclosures: Leblond: ROCHE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MUNDIPHARMA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GENZYME: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELGENE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JANSSEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tournilhac:MUNDIPHARMA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GENZYME: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELGENE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Choquet:ROCHE : Consultancy.

scholarly journals Long-Term Follow-up of Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treated with Venetoclax Monotherapy

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2883-2883
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Davids ◽  
Andrew W. Roberts ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Kathryn Humphrey ◽  
Debbie J Alter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Venetoclax is a selective, oral inhibitor of BCL2, a key regulator of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. The dose-escalation phase 1 study of venetoclax in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) enrolled 106 patients from June 2011, and the overall response rate across the entire NHL cohort was 44%. The highest response rate (75%) was seen in the 28 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (Davids et al., J Clin Oncol. 2017). Here, we report longer-term outcomes for those patients, now with a median of 27 months (range: 0.2 - 59) follow up. Methods: Venetoclax was administered in dose cohorts ranging from a maximum dose of 300-1200 mg and continued until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity; intra-patient dose escalation was allowed. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed by NCI-CTCAE v4.0 and responses were assessed using 2007 Cheson IWG response criteria, utilizing CT scans beginning at week 6. The data cut off for this analysis was June 4th, 2018. Results: For the 28 patients with MCL, the median age was 72 years (range: 35 - 85). They had received a median of 3 (range: 1 - 7) prior treatments; 5 patients received prior PI3K inhibitor (but no prior ibrutinib). The median time from the preceding treatment to start of venetoclax was 13 months (range: 2 - 148). The median dose of venetoclax was 400 mg/day; 25/28 received at least 400mg/day. Median time on study drug was 11 months (range: 0.2 - 59). Three patients have been on therapy for over 4 years. The overall response rate was 75%, with 6 (21%) patients achieving complete remission (CR) and 15 (54%) partial response (PR). The median duration of response was 16 months (95% CI: 4, 30) and median progression free survival was 11 months (95% CI: 5, 21) for all patients (Figure). The 2 year PFS estimate was 30% (95% CI: 14%, 47%) for all patients, 83% (95% CI: 27%, 97%) for patients who achieved CR and 14% (95% CI: 2%, 37%) for patients who achieved PR. One patient who achieved PR proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant and remained disease free at the last protocol defined follow-up (24 months after coming off study). Three patients developed progressive disease after receiving venetoclax for more than two years of therapy (time to progression: 31, 33, and 33 months). Two patients with CR continue on study without evidence of progression, currently at 47 and 59 months of venetoclax monotherapy. The most common (≥25% of patients with MCL) all grade treatment emergent AEs were nausea (57%), diarrhea (50%), fatigue (39%), constipation (29%) and upper respiratory infection (25%). The most common (≥10% of patients with MCL) grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (14%), anemia (14%), pneumonia (11%), and thrombocytopenia (11%). Biochemical tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), without accompanying clinical features, was reported in one patient considered high risk for TLS. Specific interventions were not required, and the patient continued on study drug. Conclusions: Venetoclax monotherapy leads to durable remission in a meaningful proportion of patients with pretreated MCL. Further studies in MCL are currently investigating potential biomarkers for durable response to venetoclax combination regimens, including a Phase 3 randomized study with ibrutinib (SYMPATICO, NCT03112174). Disclosures Davids: Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; AbbVie, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Surface Oncology: Research Funding. Roberts:Walter and Eliza Hall: Employment, Patents & Royalties: Employee of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research which receives milestone and royalty payments related to venetoclax; AbbVie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Wierda:Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding. Humphrey:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Alter:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Masud:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Buss:Abbvie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Verdugo:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Seymour:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Weekly Cyclophosphamide, Subcutaneous Bortezomib and Dexamethathasone (CyBorD) for Initial Treatment of Transplant Eligible Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Experience of Two Transplant Centres

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 42-43
Author(s):  
Georgia J McCaughan ◽  
Anvita Verma ◽  
Silvia Ling ◽  
Orly Lavee ◽  
John Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Regulatory Constraints ◽  
Best Response

Introduction: Induction regimens utilising cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CyBorD) prior to autologous stem cell transplant are utilised worldwide where access to a combination immunomodulatory agent/proteasome inhibitor approach is limited due to financial or regulatory constraints. Protocols utilising weekly subcutaneous bortezomib are favoured in order to reduce toxicity, but there is a lack of published data regarding response rates and survival using this approach. Methods: We identified all patients treated between August 2015 and August 2019 at St Vincent's Hospital and January 2012 and August 2019 at Liverpool Hospital in Sydney, Australia who were prescribed four 28 day cycles of CyBorD (subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 300mg/m2 (or 500mg) and dexamethasone 40mg (day 1, 8, 15 and 22) for newly diagnosed MM with an intent to proceed to ASCT. Results: The baseline patient and disease characteristics of the 70 eligible patients are listed in Table 1. Most patients received therapy as planned (62/70) and all but one proceeded to ASCT. Seven patients had additional therapy after 4 cycles of CyBorD due to inadequate response. Best response to CyBorD induction included stable disease (SD) in 16 (23%) partial response (PR) in 30 (43%), and a VGPR or better in 24 (33%) (2 complete response (CR)). No patient had progressive disease. All but one patient had successful stem cell mobilisation. The median number of collection days was 2 (range 1-4) and median number of stem cells collected was 10.4 x 106/kg. 6 patients required plerixafor. The one patient who could not be mobilised received lenalidomide prior to mobilisation. Best response post ASCT (n = 69) prior to unplanned therapy included SD in 2 (3%), PR in 25 (35%), ≥ VGPR in 41 (59%) (4 patients with CR) and undetermined in 1. Of those who had SD following induction, 4 achieved a ≥ VGPR following ASCT, 9 had a PR, 2 had SD and 1 did not undergo ASCT. Five patients underwent a second ASCT due to inadequate response. 37 patients received maintenance. After a median of 3 years follow-up, 12 patients (17%) had died (10 from progressive disease) and 28 (40%) had progressed. Overall survival at 1 year was 100% and 3 years was 85% (95% CI 71-93%) (Figure 1). Progression free survival at 1 year was 92% (95% CI 88-97%) and 3 years was 46% (95% CI 31-60%) (Figure 1). There were no deaths during induction and no documented bortezomib dose reductions. 16 of 70 patients had unplanned hospital admissions during induction. There was no transplant related mortality. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest study evaluating use of a weekly induction protocol of subcutcutaneous bortezomib, oral cyclosphosphamide and oral dexamethasone in transplant eligible MM. It shows comparable response rates and survival outcomes to other retrospective studies and documented toxicity was low. This induction protocol remains standard of care in many countries, in particular where financial constraints limit use of combined IMID/PI induction and this study confirms the efficacy and tolerability of this commonly used protocol. Disclosures Ling: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Specialised Therapeutics: Honoraria.

Rituximab Combined With Three Cycles Of High Dose Dexamethasone Provides a Long Term Response Rate Similar To That Of Splenectomy In Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Of Duration Less Than 2 Years

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2310-2310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina S Lee ◽  
Allison Imahiyerobo ◽  
Micha Thompson ◽  
Marina Izak Karaev ◽  
Waleed Ghanima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Best Response

Abstract Background Adults with newly-diagnosed and persistent ITP usually respond to steroid based treatments such as prednisone but relapse with tapering. One 4-day cycle of Dexamethasone (dex) at 40 mg/day in newly diagnosed ITP resulted in a lasting effect in 50% of patients (pts) in 1 study. An Italian study showed that 3 cycles of dex are better than 1 cycle. Approximately 50% of pts with chronic ITP experience a complete or partial response (CR & PR) to rituximab, yet only 20% of pts have a lasting, unmaintained response after 3 years. Mechanistically, rituximab (which depletes B cells but not plasma cells) and dexamethasone (which may be the most potent anti-plasma cell agent) are a logical combination in treatment of antibody-mediated diseases such as ITP. In 2 studies of newly-diagnosed pts, dex 40mg/day x 4 followed by rituximab was more effective than dex alone (one study added more dex half way through). In our pilot study, pts at Weill Cornell Medical College (WCMC) with all stages of ITP were treated with a combination of rituximab (R) and usually 3 cycles of dex. The outcome of this combination was retrospectively analyzed. Methods Combination of standard-dose rituximab (weekly x 4) and usually 3 4-day cycles of 28mg/m2 (max. 40mg) dex at 2-week intervals (R+3Dex) was explored in 67 pediatric and adult pts with ITP at WCMC. Patients were monitored with CBCs obtained weekly and then at less frequent intervals if a response was achieved. Best response (after 8 weeks to avoid transient effects of dex) was determined. Patients were categorized as CR (platelet count≥100x109/L) or PR (50-100x109/L). Relapse was defined as either two consecutive platelet counts <50x109/L and/or need for additional therapy. The duration of response was calculated from date of first rituximab administration to relapse or latest follow-up as of July 31st 2013. Results Overall, 50 of 67 pts treated with R+3Dex achieved a best response of either a CR (n=43) or a PR (n=7) at 8 weeks or later from start of therapy for an overall response rate of 75%. Seventy-three percent of pts received R+3Dex; variations were primarily in the timing and amount of dex given. Fifteen responders, 9 CRs and 6 PRs, relapsed at a median of 9 months. Seventy percent of the responders (or 52% of all pts treated) maintain a continuous response with platelet counts ≥ 50 x 109/L as of their last visit at a median f/u of 20 months. Kaplan Meier Analysis estimates 44% of all pts treated (Figure) and 59% of responders (Figure) maintained a best response without relapse at 67 months after initiating treatment. If only those with ITP ≤ 24 months are included, the estimated long term response rate is 59% (p=0.0017) versus only 19% for those with a duration of ITP > 24 months (Figure). Of 36 responding children and adults who had ITP ≤ 24 months, 29 continued to respond as of last follow up. Adults initially responded better than children (p=0.0019) but the long-term responses were not different (Figure). Pts achieving a CR had longer response than those achieving a PR. Adverse events related to R+Dex were usually mild-moderate, although 3 pts had serum sickness and 2 had transient colitis. IgG levels fell to below the lower limit of normal for age in 14 of 67 pts, 10 of whom had their IgG levels return to normal. In 6 of 14, IgG levels were < 400 mg/dl, some of whom received IVIG. Fifteen patients had serial BK/JC levels without ever detecting virus. Conclusions R+3Dex provides clearly superior results to rituximab alone. Notably, there was a 75% response rate overall (50/67 pts) compared to 50% with R alone. The 5 year response rate was almost 50% of all patients and 3/5 of responders. In patients who had had ITP for ≤ 2 years, the response is comparable to what has been reported with splenectomy. Specifically the results in the ≤ 2 year group suggest that R+3Dex is an effective way to induce indefinitely normal platelet counts in pts with a “short” duration of ITP. R+3Dex was tolerable although patients had difficulty with 3 cycles of dex. The 21% rate of hypogammaglobulinemia, higher than that seen with R alone, is also evidence of the mechanism of R+3Dex affecting both B cells and plasma cells. The lasting, long-lived, unmaintained responses observed in this study suggest that this combination therapeutic strategy should be further tested in a controlled trial in patients with newly diagnosed, persistent, and early chronic ITP, whether or not they have been previously treated with other agents. Disclosures: Bussel: Sysmex: Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; Symphogen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shionogi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; IgG of America: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Bendamustine and Rituximab Versus Dexamethasone, Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2968-2968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Paludo ◽  
Jithma P Abeykoon ◽  
Amber B Hesse ◽  
Amanda Shreders ◽  
Sikander Ailawadhi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Best Response

Abstract Background Bendamustine/rituximab (BR) and dexamethasone/rituximab/cyclophosphamide (DRC) combination therapy are acceptable options for the treatment of WM, both in the frontline or salvage setting. Prospective data, however, are only available in treatment-naïve (TN) WM patients, and no direct comparison between BR and DRC has been reported. We compared outcomes of BR and DRC in relapsed/refractory (R/R) and TN WM patients seen at a single institution. Methods Records of WM patients seen consecutively at Mayo Clinic from 01/2007 to 12/2014 were reviewed. The MYD88L265P status, as assessed by AS-PCR, was recorded when available. The data obtained from symptomatic patients treated with DRC or BR were analyzed. The time-to-event analyses were performed from DRC or BR therapy using the Kaplan-Meier method. We used the Consensus criteria (6th International Workshop) for response assessment. Results Of 160 WM patients, 60 patients received BR (73% in R/R setting) and 100 patients received DRC (50% in R/R setting). In the R/R population, BR was the 2nd line (range 2-11) therapy in 47% of patients, while DRC was 2nd line (range 2-8) in 58% of patients. Rituximab monotherapy was the only prior line of therapy in 8 (20%) patients in the BR group and 20 (40%) in the DRC group (p=0.66). Baseline characteristics were similar in patients treated with BR or DRC (Table 1). Six patients received both BR and DRC during their disease course and overlapped between the 2 cohorts. Among the previous untreated patients, the median IgM levels decreased from 3,785 mg/dL to 724 mg/dL (p=0.0001) at best response with BR, while it decreased from 4,130 mg/dL to 1,250 mg/dL (p=0.001) with DRC. The median time to best response was 6.1 (1-25) months in the BR group and 11 (0.5-47) months in the DRC group (p=0.13). For patients treated with BR, the overall response rate (ORR) was 93% [VGPR 29% (n=4), PR 57% (n=8), MR 7% (n=1)]. One patient (7%) had progressive disease. For patients treated with DRC, ORR was 96% [VGPR 17% (n=8), PR 70% (n=32), MR 9% (n=4)]. One patient (4%) achieved SD. Median follow up in the BR and DRC groups were similar (30 months). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 88% and 61% in the BR and DRC groups, respectively (p=0.08). The 2-year time-to-next therapy (TTNT) was 88% and 76% in the BR and DRC groups, respectively (p=0.35). Median PFS, TTNT and disease specific survival (DSS) were not reached with either regimen. In the R/R setting, the median IgM levels decreased from 3,880 mg/dL to 659 mg/dL (p=0.0001) at best response with BR, and from 3,870 mg/dL to 1,846 mg/dL (p=0.001) with DRC. The median time to best response was similar [7 (1-39) months with BR and 7 (0.5-28) months with DRC (p=0.77)]. For patients treated with BR, ORR was 95% [CR 3% (n=1), VGPR 38% (n=14), PR 41% (n=15), MR 13% (n=5)]. Two patients (5%) had progressive disease. With DRC, the ORR was 87% [VGPR 4% (n=2), PR 64% (n=30), MR 19% (n=9)]. Four patients (9%) achieved SD and 2 patients (4%) had progressive disease. Median follow up from BR was 32 months and 51 months from DRC (p=0.24). The 2-year PFS was 66% and 53% in the BR and DRC groups, respectively (p=0.08). The 2-year TTNT was 75% and 68% in the BR and DRC groups, respectively (p=0.24). The median DSS in the BR group was 69 months (95% CI: 65-69) and NR (95% CI: NR-NR) in the DRC group (p=0.57). The proportion of patients with R/R disease was significantly higher in the BR cohort (Table 1). In a bivariate analysis of the entire cohort for PFS, incorporating the setting (TN vs. RR) and the regimen involved (BR vs. DRC), the latter emerged as a significant factor (hazard ratio 0.52, p=0.019) in favor of BR. Time-to-event outcomes and response rates were similar in the MYD88L265P and MYD88WT patients. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (12%), infections (7%) and nausea/vomiting (2%) with BR, and neutropenia (20%), thrombocytopenia (7%) and infections (3%) with DRC. Conclusions Although both DRC and BR regimens show activity and comparable toxicities, BR regimen shows a trend for superior PFS in WM patients, both in the TN and R/R setting. No difference was seen in TTNT. MYD88 L265P mutation status does not appear to impact activity of BR or DRC. Randomized controlled trial(s) are needed to confirm our findings. Disclosures Ailawadhi: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Ansell:BMS, Seattle Genetics, Merck, Celldex and Affimed: Research Funding. Reeder:Millennium: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Jannsen: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; pfizer: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar:Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Kesios: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Skyline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Noxxon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kapoor:Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Seven Year Follow up and Comparison of Dosing Strategies from the Pivotal Phase II Clinical Trial of Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab (R2) in Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1594-1594
Author(s):  
Nathan H. Fowler ◽  
Preetesh Jain ◽  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
F. B. Hagemeister ◽  
Sheryl G Forbes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Best Response

Abstract Introduction: We have previously reported the results of cohort A from a single arm, phase II clinical trial of lenalidomide with rituximab (R2) as frontline treatment for patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL), Fowler N et al Lancet Oncology 2014. Recent randomized studies (RELEVANCE) did not demonstrate superiority of either R2 or R-Chemo in untreated, high GELF FL, but follow up is short. We now report outcomes of an additional extended dosing cohort (12 mo of R2) and the long term follow up of the both dosing schedules in untreated FL. Methods: A total of 154 pts were included in the original clinical trial (FL, n=80; MZL, n=31; SLL, n=43). Characteristics were collected at the time of starting R2 treatment. Patients received lenalidomide 20 mg/day on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle (6 cycles; schedule A) and lenalidomide 20 mg/day on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle for cycles 1-6 then lenalidomide 10 mg/day on days 2-22 for cycles 7-12 with rituximab 375mg/m2 IV x1 weekly on cycle 1 and day 1 of every subsequent cycle (12 cycles; schedule B). Responders continued treatment for at least 6 but up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were complete and partial response (CR, PR), safety, and progression free survival (PFS). PFS was defined as time from starting treatment to disease progression or death, event free survival included time from starting treatment to discontinuation due to any cause and overall survival (OS) was defined from the time of initial diagnosis of FL to death/last follow up. Results: Eighty pts with FL were enrolled in study and followed a median of 86 months. Median age was 58 years (range, 29 to 84); 50% were males. 61% pts had grade 1 FL and 39% had grade 2 FL. Schedule A was administered in 50 pts and schedule B in 30 pts. Seventy seven pts were evaluable for initial response assessment and 76 (98%) responded. The best response rate was 95% (87% CR/CRu). At the time of last follow up, 23 patients experienced disease progression, 13 lost to follow up (all had CR as best response and had completed tx), 4 came off study due to pt choice/financial and 4 due to intolerance (2 arterio-thrombotic event, 1 respiratory failure, 1 intolerance) during therapy. After a median follow up of 86 mo, 23 pts (29%) progressed, 5 yr PFS was 75%. Five yr PFS was 70% and 82% for pts on cohort A vs B respectively (P=.30). Overall, 2 pts died, with a 5 year survival 97%, Figure-1 (A-B). The median event free survival in pts with FL was 85 months with a 5 year EFS of 59%. Subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant difference in PFS with FLIPI score, bulky disease and by initial bone marrow involvement. Pts who achieved CR had significantly longer PFS compared to those who did not achieve CR (not reached vs 78 months; p = 0.004), however the OS was not significantly different between the two groups Figure-1 (C-F). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic AEs included neutropenia (28%), thrombocytopenia (3%), and no anemia. Count recovery occurred in all pts with follow up and/or dose modification. Nine pts developed second primary cancers, including one melanoma in-situ, 3 localized skin cancers, and 2 secondary hematologic malignancies. Conclusions: A combination of lenalidomide with rituximab produced durable responses in pts with FL. At a follow up of 7 years, the majority of pts remain in remission and patients who achieved CR had the best outcomes. Five year PFS may be longer in pts who received 12mo of therapy, but will need larger analysis to confirm. Further studies are ongoing to analyze mutation dynamics and genomic profile to identify molecular biomarkers. Disclosures Fowler: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Nastoupil:Novartis: Honoraria; Juno: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; TG Therappeutics: Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Westin:Apotex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wang:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Juno: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MoreHealth: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Samaniego:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Venetoclax in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5576-5576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swetha Kambhampati ◽  
Derek Galligan ◽  
Guy Ledergor ◽  
Thomas G. Martin ◽  
Jeffrey Wolf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Off Label Use ◽  
Final Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Best Response

Background Despite recent advances, treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains a challenge. Venetoclax, a BH3 mimetic, is an oral, specific, and potent small molecule inhibitor of BCL-2 that has been approved for treatment of 17p-deleted CLL and in combination with azacitidine or decitabine in AML patients >/= 75 years of age.Pre-clinical and clinical studies suggest that bcl-2 inhibition can induce MM cell death and may synergize with bortezomib and dexamethasone. Based on this, several prospective clinical trials of venetoclax in RRMM have been performed. However, clinical use of this targeted therapeutic for salvage therapy in RRMM has not been well described. Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective chart review of all patients with RRMM diagnosed after January 1, 2009 who were treated with off-label use of venetoclax. The goal of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of these patients, assess the response to salvage treatment with venetoclax as determined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, and assess the toxicities during salvage treatment with venetoclax in an academic practice setting. Results 43 patients were identified. Median number of lines of prior therapy was 7 (range 2-13). 12 patients had documented high risk cytogenetics, defined as the presence of a 17p deletion, t(14;16), t(14;20), t(4,14), gain (1q), or nonhyperdiploidy. Of the 36 patients with cytogenetics/FISH available, 8 had t(11;14). 34 patients were refractory to bortezomib. 40 patients had progressed after carfilzomib, 36 after pomalidomide, and 41 after anti-CD38 antibody therapy. 39 patients were treated with venetoclax in combination with a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib (n=36); carfilzomib (n=3)). 23 patients were treated with venetoclax, proteasome inhibitor, and dexamethasone. Patients were started at 400 mg daily for 7 days then increased to the median dose of 800mg daily (11 received < 800mg/daily as a final dose and one received >800 mg/daily as final dose). Overall patients were on treatment for a median of 67 days (range 2-855). 2 patients received intermittent venetoclax therapy, defined as being off venetoclax for at least 3 months before restarting. Best response by IMWG criteria include; CR 5%( 2/43), VGPR 12% (5/43) and PR 16% (7/43) for an overall response rate of 33% (14/43). In addition, MR was seen in 5% (2/43) and stable disease in 9% (4/43). Fifty-one percent (22/43) had progressive disease (PD). Out of the 8 patients who had t(11;14), best responses were: 2 VGPR, 2 PR, 1 SD, and 3 PD for a response rate of 50% (4/8) in this subgroup. Median time to best response for all responding patients was 90 days (range 15-305) and median duration of response was 206 days (range 28-820). At time of data collection, median follow-up time from venetoclax treatment initiation was 192 days (range 8-1058). Four patients have not progressed and remain on therapy, 23 patients remain alive, and 4 patients have been lost to follow-up for over 6 months. The most common treatment related AEs were cytopenias including leukopenia in 26 /43 (60%) patients, neutropenia in 19/43 (44%) patients, and thrombocytopenia in 22/43 (51%) patients. Non-hematologic toxicities included diarrhea in 12/43 (30%) patients, nausea/vomiting in 15/43 (35%) patients, infections in 11/43 (26%) patients, and fatigue in 23/43 (53%) patients. 8/43 (19%) patients required dose reduction, 7/43 (16%) patients required temporary discontinuation of treatment, and 4/43 (9%) patients required permanent discontinuation due to treatment related AEs. 38/43 (88%) patients had any grade treatment related AEs, 27/43 (63%) patients had grade >/= 3 AEs and 2/43 (5%) patients had treatment related SAEs. One patient had a treatment related death from an infectious complication (CMV pneumonitis). Conclusions Venetoclax is an active and well-tolerated agent in relapsed multiple myeloma. Furthermore, it is easily administered in the outpatient setting. Additional areas of research with this therapy include understanding the importance of t(11:14) for response and selecting the best anti-MM partner for combination therapy. Disclosures Ledergor: Venetoclax: Other: off-label use; Immunai: Consultancy. Martin:Roche and Juno: Consultancy; Amgen, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Wolf:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Wong:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Fortis: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding. Shah:Nkarta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Poseida: Research Funding; Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Oncopeptides, Karoypharm, Surface Oncology, Precision biosciences GSK, Nektar, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; University of California, San Francisco: Employment; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teneobio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: This study is looking at the safety and efficacy of venetoclax in relapsed refractory myeloma patients who are treated off-label since venetoclax is not currently approved for multiple myeloma

scholarly journals Italian Real Life Experience with Brentuximab Vedotin: Results of a National Observational Study on Relapsed/Refractory Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3007-3007
Author(s):  
Cinzia Pellegrini ◽  
Luigi Rigacci ◽  
Caterina Patti ◽  
Guido Gini ◽  
Donato Mannina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Duration Of Response

Abstract From November 2012 to July 2014, brentuximab vedotin (BV) was available in Italy for patients with relapsed systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) outside a clinical trial context based on a local disposition of the Italian Drug Agency (AIFA) issued according to a national law (Law 648/96: "medicinal products that are provided free of charge on the national health service"). A large Italian observational retrospective study was conducted on the use of BV in the everyday clinical practice to check if clinical trial results are confirmed even in a real life context. Primary endpoint was the best response; secondary endpoints were the overall response rate at the end of the treatment, duration of response, survival and the safety profile. BV was infused intravenously at the dose of 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks for a maximum of 16 cycles. A total of 40 ALCL (18 anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK] negative and 22 ALK-positive status) patients were treated with BV in 40 Hematology Centers. All patients had histologically documented CD30+ ALCL; 16 (40%) had relapsed and 24 (60%) had refractory disease. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 2 previous therapies (including autologous transplant in the 32.5% of cases). Best response was observed after a median of 4 cycles in 31 patients (77.5%): 19 (47.5%) patients obtained a complete response (CR) and 12 (30%) achieved a partial response (PR); overall response rate at the end of the treatment was 62.5% (18 CR and 7 PR). The best response rate was higher in the elderly subset (>60 years): 9 (64.2%) CR and 3 (21.4%) PR, achieving a total of 85.6%. At the latest follow up 15/18 patients are still in CR (3 with consolidative procedure). Global progression free survival was 39.1% at 29 months and disease free survival 54% at 23.9 months (median not reached). Median duration of response was 12 months (range 9-24 months). We identified 5 long term responders (patients with a response ≥ 12 months), all were still in CR at the latest follow up (1 underwent allogeneic transplant). Particularly, all the long term responders were aged <30 years at first BV infusion. All patients were included in the safety profile for the analysis; in general, the treatment was well tolerated even in this real life context and the toxicity profile was closely similar to the previously published data; no death has been linked to BV toxicity. Toxicity was primarily neurological and rarely so serious as to require treatment reduction or interruption; furthermore, neurological toxicity always reversed completely after end of treatment. No long-term toxicity was assessed during the follow-up period, even in patients later subjected to transplant consolidation. BV induces clinical responses quite rapidly, i.e. within the first 4 cycles in most responders, thus permitting the timely application of the transplantation phase. Furthermore, BV displays a favorable toxicity profile, without overlapping toxicities with most of the agents employed in high-dose conditioning regimens. For patients ineligible for transplant or for who transplant failed, BV may represent a feasible effective therapeutic option in everyday clinical practice. Disclosures Rusconi: Takeda: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy, Other: Congress attendance; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Congress attendance. Spina:Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker Fee; Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker Fee. Zinzani:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celegene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Melphalan-Based Autologous Transplantation in the Octogenarian Multiple Myeloma Patient Population

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4608-4608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Y Saini ◽  
Romil Patel ◽  
Ankur Varma ◽  
Qaiser Bashir ◽  
Ruby Delgado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Abstract: Background: Upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) combined with novel anti-myeloma drugs is considered the standard of care for transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, this treatment is generally avoided in older patients due to concerns about toxicity. MM is primarily a disease of the elderly, with >35% patients being older than 70 years of age at diagnosis. We have previously reported on the role of auto-HCT in MM patients >70 years1. In this study, we evaluate the safety and feasibility of auto-HCT in patients ≥80 years who received auto-HCT at our institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of MM patients with age ≥80 years who underwent auto-HCT between January, 2007, and June, 2018. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated from the date of auto-HCT to the last follow up or the censored date. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS. Results: Between January, 2013, and December, 2017, out of a total of 1465 MM patients referred for evaluation for auto-HCT at our institution, only 10(0.68%) were of age ≥80 years. Also, between January, 2016, and June, 2018, a total of 210 MM patients with age ≥80 years were treated at our institution, and only 3(0.14%) underwent auto-HCT. Overall among 1740 patients with MM who received an auto-HCT at our institution between the beginning of 2007 to June, 2018, 9(0.5%) patients were ≥ 80 years of age (range 80-83). Table 1 summarizes the patient characteristics of these nine patients. All patients had an ECOG performance status of either 0 or 1. The median hematopoietic stem cell transplant - comorbidity index for the cohort was 3 (range, 0-5). Eight (89%) patients were in first remission, and 1 (11%) patient had relapsed disease at auto-HCT. All patients received melphalan at a reduced dose of 140 mg/m2 as the conditioning regimen. Eight patients (89%) received maintenance therapy with lenalidomide. The median follow-up from auto-HCT was 18 months (range 0.5 - 50 months). No (0%) patient died within 100 days of auto-HCT. Out of 8 evaluable patients, 4 (50%) achieved a complete response, 2 (25%) very-good partial, and 2 (25%) achieved a partial response with an overall response rate of 100%. Eight (89%) patients were alive until the last follow-up. Median PFS was 31.5 months, while the median OS has not been reached (Fig1). 2-yr PFS and OS were 62.5% and 75% respectively. One patient died 22 months post-transplant due to non-transplant related cause. Conclusions: In selected MM patients ≥80 years old, auto-HCT was feasible, with 0% TRM, 100% response rate, and 2-year OS of 75%. Almost 90% of these patients went on to receive maintenance therapy. References: Qazilbash, M. H. et al. Autologous stem cell transplantation is safe and feasible in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplantation39, 279-283 (2007). Disclosures Shpall: Affirmed GmbH: Research Funding. Thomas:Celgene: Research Funding; Array Pharma: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb Inc.: Research Funding. Lee:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai Biopharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patel:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Orlowski:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioTheryX, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy. Champlin:Otsuka: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Tolerability of Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma Patients Not Eligible for Stem Cell Transplant

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4566-4566
Author(s):  
May Chiu ◽  
Samuel Hague ◽  
Henry Chan
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Gemcitabine, Dexamethasone, and Cisplatin or Carboplatin (GDP/GDCarboP) regimen has comparable efficacy to other salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) aggressive lymphoma with successful stem cell mobilisation and bridge to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT)(Crump et al. 2004). However, half of the patients will not be eligible for ASCT due to inadequate treatment response or co-morbidities. To date, there is little data on the efficacy of Gemcitabine-based salvage regimen in transplant-ineligible patients. Here, we present the real-life data on the outcome of transplant-ineligible patients with R/R NHL and HL treated with salvage GDP/GDCarboP in our centre. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients ≥ 18 years old who had received at least 1 cycle of GDP/GDcarboP with or without Rituximab as second-line or more salvage therapy for R/R non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated between January 2016 to December 2020, with follow-up until 30 June 2021. The median follow-up is 25 months. Patients who subsequently underwent autologous or allogeneic SCT were excluded. Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as time from first dose of GDP/GDCarboP treatment to change of therapy, disease progression or death. Overall survival (OS) is defined as time of first dose of treatment to death from any cause. Duration of response (DoR) is time from the achievement of partial response (PR) or better to disease progression (DP) or death. Rituximab was given for CD20-positive B cell lymphoma patients who had Rituximab treatment-free interval of 12-months or more. Pegfilgrastim was given routinely to all patients on Day 4. Results: We identified 33 patients: 61% (n=20) high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL), 15% (n=5) follicular lymphoma (FL), 18% (n=6) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and 6% (n=2) HL. Majority (64%) of the patients were male. At the start of this treatment, the median age was 71 years (y) (range, 32-84 y), with 64% above 70 y. The median Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 5, with 82% having a score of ≥5. The median prior line of treatment was 2. Eighty-five percent had stage III/IV disease at the time of disease relapse. The overall response rate was 33% (n=11), comprising PR rate of 18% (n=6) and CR rate of 15% (n=5). The response rates amongst the different lymphoma subtypes were 35% (7/20) HGBCL, 20% (1/5) FL, 17% (1/6) PTCL and 100% (2/2) HL. The median DoR was 27 months (Figure 1). Of those who responded, 3 had disease progression within the year, and 1 died of non-lymphoma cause 27 months after treatment completion. There were 7 deaths (21%) during treatment - 4 from DP, 2 from treatment complications (TC) and 1 from an uncertain cause. Of the remainder, 2 patients (6%) achieved stable disease while 7 (21%) had DP. Seven patients (21%) had subsequent change of therapy due to inadequate response. The overall median EFS was 4.0 months (Figure 2), and the median OS was 18 months (Figure 3). Disease-associated mortality was 42%, whereas treatment-associated mortality was 9%. Dose reduction, dose omission and treatment delay occurred in 55% of patients. During treatment, 73% of patients required red cells or platelets transfusion, while 70% had at least one hospital admission for TC or DP. Conclusion: Our real-world data showed that GDP/GDCarboP provides meaningful efficacy and response durability in a third of these difficult-to-treat patients with median 2 prior lines of treatment and who were ineligible for SCT. More than half of these patients had required dose modification, blood transfusion, and hospital admission, indicating the need for good supportive care and close follow-up during treatment, even though this is an outpatient regimen. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chan: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eusa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Celgene: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Outcome of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2149-2149
Author(s):  
Romil Patel ◽  
Neeraj Y Saini ◽  
Ankur Varma ◽  
Omar Hasan ◽  
Qaiser Bashir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Remission ◽  
Relapsed Disease

Abstract Introduction: The role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in the management of patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM), a rare, indolent lymphoma, has not been established. We had previously published our experience with auto-HCT in a small cohort of WM patients1. Here, we present an updated analysis of auto-HCT with a larger cohort of WM patients. Methods and study population: The study cohort was comprised of 29 patients who underwent high-dose chemotherapy and auto-HCT at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create survival curves. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration from date of transplant to death or last date of follow-up in living patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the duration from date of transplant to either progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first. Results: Median age at auto-HCT was 60 (range, 43-75 years). Eight patients (28%) had concurrent light chain amyloidosis (AL). Of the five patients who had MYD88 testing completed, 3 were positive for the MYD88 mutation. Additionally, of these 3 patients, 2 were also positive for CXCR4 mutation. Patients received a median of 2 lines (range 1-6) of therapy prior to auto-HCT; 3(10%) patients had primary refractory disease, 8(28%) were in first remission, and 18 (62%) had relapsed disease. Median time from transplant to last follow-up for the surviving patients was 5.3 years. Preparative regimens received by the patients were: Melphalan (n=20), BEAM-R (n=2), Busulfan/Melphalan (n=1), Cyclophosphomaide/Etoposide/total body irradiation (n=1), Thiotepa/Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (n=1), and Carmustine/Thiotepa (n=1). Three patients further went on to receive allogeneic transplant either after relapse from auto-HCT or due to disease transformation to aggressive lymphoma. Twenty-eight patients achieved engraftment with a median time to neutrophil engraftment of 11 days (range, 10-15 days). One patient suffered primary graft failure due to progression of disease and died 84 days after transplant. Non-relapse mortality was 3.4% at 1 year. All patients were eligible for response evaluation. The median OS from diagnosis was 12.2 years. Overall response rate was 96%: complete response (n=8, 27.6%), very good partial response (n=5, 17.3%), partial response (n=15, 51.7%), and progressive disease (n=1, 3.4%). PFS and OS at 5 years were 43.3% and 62.9%, respectively. Median PFS and OS from auto-HCT were 4.1 and 7.3 years (Fig. 1A). The median OS from auto-HCT in first remission + primary refractory and relapsed disease was 8.2 years and 4.1 years, respectively.16 patients were alive at the time of censoring while 13 patients had died. Causes of death include relapsed disease (n=6), secondary malignancy (n=2), infection (n=1), chronic graft-versus-host disease (n=1), and unknown (n=3). 8 patients (28%) were positive for concurrent AL amyloidosis. The sites of amyloid involvement were kidneys (n=2), lungs (n=1), bone marrow (n=1), heart(n=1), lymph nodes(n=1), gastrointestinal tract (n=1) and subcutaneous fat aspirate(n=5). The median overall survival for patients with amyloid involvement (n=8) was 12 years. On univariate analyses, the number of chemotherapy regimens prior to transplant (≤ 2 vs >2 lines) was the strongest predictor of overall survival (p=0.03, HR 0.3, CI: 0.09-0.9, log-rank) and PFS (p=0.001, HR 0.24, CI: 0.07-0.85, log-rank). The median PFS in patients with ≤ 2 lines and > 2 lines of therapy was 71 months versus 19 months, respectively (Fig. 1B). Conclusion: Auto-HCT is safe and feasible in selected patients with WM, with a high response rate and durable remission even in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. References: Krina Patel et.al. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. Blood 2012 120:4533; Disclosures Thomas: Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb Inc.: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Array Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Research Funding. Lee:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai Biopharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Orlowski:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; BioTheryX: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Champlin:Otsuka: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Patel:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document