Immunoglobulin Heavy/Light Chain Ratios as An Alternative to Immunofixation In the Identification of Monoclonal Gammopathies

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 5018-5018
Author(s):  
Anandram Seetharam ◽  
Tracy Lovatt ◽  
Alan Macwhannell ◽  
Abe Jacob ◽  
Sunil Honda ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5018 Introduction Historically, serum protein electrophoresis (SPE), urine protein electrophoresis (UPE) and immunofixation (IFE) have been used to identify and quantify monoclonal proteins (M-proteins). Whilst this approach is adequate for the identification of intact immunoglobulin multiple myeloma (MM), it is not sensitive enough to detect free light chain MM (LCMM). Therefore, an algorithm which utilises SPE, serum free light chain (FLC) immunoassays and IFE for the identification of M-proteins has been suggested. Assays have now been developed which utilise polyclonal antisera raised against the kappa and lambda light chain types of IgG, IgA and IgM immunoglobulins (HLC). Here we report the use of these assays as an alternative to IFE and propose a screening algorithm which utilises SPE, FLC and HLC Materials and Methods Serum FLC measurement was added to 1063 requests for SPE, from primary care or from a hospital source. Samples from patients with previously diagnosed MM, Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia and lymphoma were, where possible, removed. Sera showing monoclonal proteins or hypogammaglobulinemia (by SPE) or an abnormal FLC ratio were tested further by IFE and IgG, IgA, IgM HLC assays. SPE and IFE were performed on a SEBIA Hydrasys system, and gels were interpreted by experienced clinical chemists. FLC and HLC measurements were performed on a Siemens BN™II nephelometer. HLC results were compared with IFE results and clinical diagnoses. The study was approved by the Wolverhampton, New Cross, NHS Trust Review Board Results 80/1063 patients were identified as having abnormal SPE or abnormal FLC results. 42/80 patients had positive IFE results. 24/42 of these patients were positive by HLC (Table 1), 11/42 had light chain only myeloma/MGUS, the remaining 7/42 were MGUS patients. The 7 MGUS patients (6 IgG and 1 IgM) with normal HLC ratios and positive IFE all had less than 2g/L monoclonal protein measured by SPE densitometry and a normal FLC ratio. Of the 38/80 with normal IFE's all had been investigated further because of abnormal FLC results. 9/38 had abnormal HLC ratios of which 3/9 had confirmed hematological malignancies (1× chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 1× small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) and 1× asymptomatic MM (ASMM)). The use of FLC immunoassays alongside SPE as part of the primary screening protocol identified 10 additional hematological malignancies (1× ASMM, 6×CLL, 2× non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 1× SLL). Discussion HLC ratio analysis matched IFE for the identification of all symptomatic haematological malignancies. Abnormal FLC ratios identified 10 additional haematological malignancies of which 3 also had abnormal HLC ratios, which would have been missed using SPE/ IFE. In 7/19 MGUS (6×IgG, 1×IgM) patients there were normal HLC ratios. In all cases the monoclonal protein load was below 2g/L and the FLC ratio was normal; identifying the IgG patients as having a low risk and the IgM patient as having a low/intermediate risk of progression. It may be beneficial not to identify these patients, who do not require therapeutic intervention or justify close monitoring. Another advantage of using HLC analysis instead of IFE is that the HLC ratio has been found to be a prognostic indicator in myeloma and MGUS. It would also form a useful “baseline” comparison if HLC assays were used in monitoring or for the detection of residual disease. Conclusions HLC analysis identified all symptomatic patients who were IFE positive and in an additional 3 hematological malignancies. Low risk MGUS patients may not be identified using these tests but this might be beneficial to patients and physicians alike Disclosures: Harding: Binding Site Group Ltd: Employment.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4856-4856
Author(s):  
Arthur R. Bradwell ◽  
Jean Garbincius ◽  
Earle W. Holmes

Abstract Serum free light chain measurements have been shown to be useful in the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with monoclonal gammopathies. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of adding the measurement of serum free light chain kappa to lambda ratios to the serum protein electrophoresis evaluation that we typically use as an initial screen for the detection of monoclonal proteins. We retrospectively tested 347 consecutive samples from individuals who had no previous history of plasma cell dyscrasia and had not previously had a serum or urine electrophoresis or immunofixation electrophoresis test at our institution. The quantitative serum protein electrophoresis test that was ordered was performed using Hydragel Beta 1- Beta 2 gels and Hydrasis instrument (Sebia, Inc., Norcross, GA). The protein content of the electrophoresis zones were quantitated by scanning densitometry and the electrophoresis pattern of each sample was qualitatively examined for abnormal bands and suspicious findings by a single, experienced observer. Serum free light chain concentrations and the serum free light chain kappa to lambda ratios were determined using the Freelite Human Kappa and Lambda Kits (The Binding Site Ltd, Birmingham, UK) and the Immage analyzer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA). The serum free light chain kappa to lambda ratios were outside the reference interval (0.25 to1.65) in 23 of the samples. Ten abnormal ratios were observed among a group of 57 samples that had either positive or suspicious qualitative evaluations for the presence of a restriction or that demonstrated hypo-gammaglobulinemia. Both abnormalities led to recommendations for follow-up testing, which confirmed the presence of a monoclonal protein in 21 of the samples. Six abnormal ratios were observed among a group of 159 specimens that had quantitative abnormalities in albumin or one or more of globulin fractions (hypo-gammaglobulinemia excepted) and normal qualitative evaluations. Seven abnormal ratios were observed among a group of 131 samples that had normal quantitative results and normal qualitative evaluations. Follow-up testing is not usually recommended for serum protein electrophoresis results like those in the latter two groups. We found that the addition of the serum free light chain kappa to lambda ratio to the serum protein electrophoresis test increased the number of abnormal screens that would have required further clinical and/or laboratory evaluation by 23%(i.e. from 57 to 70). Given the high specificity of the serum free light chain kappa to lambda ratio for monoclonal light chains, the additional 13 abnormal samples identified by this test are expected to have a high likelihood of harboring a monoclonal protein that would have otherwise eluded detection. Pending a definitive prospective study, we estimate that the addition of a serum free light chain kappa to lambda ratio to the serum protein electrophoresis screen would increase the rate of detection of serum monoclonal proteins by as much as 1.6-fold.


Author(s):  
Kate Wetenhall ◽  
Rehana Saleem ◽  
Anthony Rowbottom

Background In a small, but potentially significant proportion of patients with a monoclonal gammopathy, patients show the existence of an intact monoclonal (M-) protein co-migrating with a free light chain (FLC) M-protein. Using traditional methods for detection of monoclonal immunoglobulins, only the intact M-protein may be detectable, and hence the FLC M-proteins may be missed. Methods Immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) using two different sets of antisera were compared (one detecting both free and bound FLC epitopes, and one detecting only the free FLC epitopes), alongside urine protein electrophoresis and the Freelite assay in order to ascertain the best methods of detecting both types of M-proteins in this subset of patients. Results A total of 2% of the patient population tested were shown to have a FLC M-protein migrating coincidentally with an intact M-protein. These were not detected by IFE using the widely utilised antisera to both free and bound FLC epitopes, and hence may have been missed during routine testing, but were detectable using the other methods. Conclusions This study highlights the important finding that in some patients with both an intact and a FLC M-protein, the FLC M-protein may be missed during routine testing. In incidences where no corresponding urine sample is sent to the laboratory alongside the serum sample, we would suggest testing for the presence of FLC M-proteins in this subset of patients using the Freelite assay, if no urine sample can be obtained, to ensure all FLC M-proteins are appropriately detected.


Author(s):  
Maria A.V. Willrich ◽  
Jerry A. Katzmann

AbstractMonoclonal immunoglobulins are markers of plasma cell proliferative diseases and have been described as the first (and perhaps best) serological tumor marker. The unique structure of each monoclonal protein makes them highly specific for each plasma cell clone. The difficulties of using monoclonal proteins for diagnosing and monitoring multiple myeloma, however, stem from the diverse disease presentations and broad range of serum protein concentrations and molecular weights. Because of these challenges, no single test can confidently diagnose or monitor all patients. Panels of tests have been recommended for sensitivity and efficiency. In this review we discuss the various disease presentations and the use of various tests such as protein electrophoresis and immunofixation electrophoresis as well as immunoglobulin quantitation, free light chain quantitation, and heavy-light chain quantitation by immuno-nephelometry. The choice of tests for inclusion in diagnostic and monitoring panels may need to be tailored to each patient, and examples are provided. The panel currently recommended for diagnostic screening is serum protein electrophoresis, immunofixation electrophoresis, and free light chain quantitation.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5011-5011
Author(s):  
Jerry A. Katzmann ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Robert Kyle ◽  
Melissa R. Snyder ◽  
Mathew F. Plevak ◽  
...  

Abstract Due to the diagnostic sensitivity of serum free light chain quantitation for monoclonal light chain diseases, it has been suggested that urine assays no longer need be performed as part of the diagnostic algorithm for monoclonal proteins. We reviewed our experience to determine the relative diagnostic contribution of urine assays. Methods: Patients with a monoclonal gammopathy and monoclonal urinary protein at initial diagnosis who also had a serum immunofixation and serum free light chain quantitation within 30 days of diagnosis were identified (n = 428). The laboratory results for serum protein electrophoresis, serum immunofixation, serum free light chain, urine protein electrophoresis, and urine immunofixation were reviewed. Results: The patients in this cohort had diagnoses of multiple myeloma, primary amyloid, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering multiple myeloma, solitary plasmacytomas, and other less frequently detected monoclonal gammopathies. By definition of the cohort, all 428 had a monoclonal urine protein. 86% had an abnormal serum free light chain K/L ratio, 81% had an abnormal serum protein electrophoresis, and 94% had an abnormal serum immunofixation. In only 2 patients, however, were all 3 serum assays normal. Both of these were patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (idiopathic Bence Jones proteinuria). Conclusion: Discontinuation of urine studies and reliance on a diagnostic algorithm using solely serum studies (protein electrophoresis, immunofixation, and free light chain quantitation), missed 2 of the 428 monoclonal gammopathies (0.5 %) with urinary monoclonal proteins, and these 2 cases required no medical intervention.


Author(s):  
Richard B Fulton ◽  
Suran L Fernando

Background The potential for serum free light chain (sFLC) assay measurements to replace urine electrophoresis (uEPG) and to also diminish the need for serum immunofixation (sIFE) in the screening for monoclonal gammopathy was assessed. A testing algorithm for monoclonal protein was developed based on our data and cost analysis. Methods Data from 890 consecutive sFLC requests were retrospectively analysed. These included 549 samples for serum electrophoresis (sEPG), 447 for sIFE, and 318 for uEPG and urine immunofixation (uIFE). A total of 219 samples had sFLC, sEPG, sIFE and uEPG + uIFE performed. The ability of different test combinations to detect the presence of monoclonal proteins was compared. Results The sFLC κ/ λ ratio (FLC ratio) indicated monoclonal light chains in 12% more samples than uEPG + uIFE. The combination of sEPG and FLC ratio detected monoclonal proteins in 49% more samples than the combination of sEPG and sIFE. Furthermore, the sEPG + FLC ratio combination detected monoclonal protein in 6% more samples than were detected by the combined performance of sEPG, sIFE, uEPG and uIFE. However, non-linearity of the assay, the expense of repeat determinations due to the narrow measuring ranges, and frequent antigen excess checks were found to be limitations of the sFLC assay in this study. Conclusion The FLC ratio is a more sensitive method than uIFE in the detection of monoclonal light chains and may substantially reduce the need for onerous 24 h urine collections. Our proposed algorithm for the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy incorporates the sFLC assay, resulting in a reduction in the performance of labour intensive sIFE and uEPG + uIFE while still increasing the detection of monoclonal proteins.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 673-673
Author(s):  
Nicholas Burwick ◽  
Jacob Stein ◽  
David A Garcia ◽  
Virginia C. Broudy ◽  
Robert E. Richard

Abstract Introduction : Non-visit electronic consultation (e-consult) is an important component of care for veterans in the VA healthcare system who require sub-specialty consultation but not urgent face to face evaluation. Since the majority of patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) are low-risk of disease transformation, we reasoned that e-consult would be a safe and effective way to manage MGUS in most cases. Here we sought to characterize our current e-consult practice patterns for the surveillance of MGUS and identify key questions for future investigation. Methods : We performed a retrospective analysis of our electronic consult database from 1/1/2010-12/31/2014 to identify cases of monoclonal gammopathy. Monoclonal gammopathy was confirmed on chart review by an attending hematologist. To be included in the analysis, a patient had to have either 1) a monoclonal protein by serum or urine protein electrophoresis (SPEP/UPEP) or immunofixation or 2) abnormal serum free light chain (FLC) ratio, using a normal reference range of 0.26-1.65, with an increase in the involved light chain. Pertinent clinical and demographic data was abstracted and was used to analyze outcomes among the cohort. Results : We screened 3,217 electronic hematology consults to identify a cohort of 152 MGUS patients triaged for e-consult over a five-year period. E-consult services were provided for veterans from 23 different counties with an average time to completion of 3.4 days. The average size of monoclonal (M) protein was 0.25 g/dL (0-1.5 g/dL). 84% of patients had an M-protein concentration less than 0.5 g/dL. Following completion of risk-stratification studies, 113/121 (93%) of patients with available risk scores were lower risk for disease progression (0-1 risk factors). There were 11 cases with negative SPEP for whom a risk score could not be calculated. An additional 20 cases had a positive SPEP without available free light chain data. A minority of patients (29%) had FLC data available at the time of consult. At 3-months post-consult, 71% had completed FLC testing. One-third of patients had an abnormal hemoglobin (hgb) and 41% had an abnormal creatinine (cr) using the normal reference ranges. However, 96% of MGUS e-consults had a hgb >10 g/dL and 90% had a cr <2 mg/dL. Among those tested (n=91), one patient had skeletal abnormalities concerning for myelomatous bone disease on initial screening. One-third of cases utilized multiple e-consult encounters over time, while 15% of MGUS e-consults ultimately required a face-to-face visit with hematology. With an average follow-up of 47 months (median 44 months), there were 6 documented progression events, representing a mean rate of progression of 1% per year (Figure). Conclusions : We find that electronic consultation is a helpful mechanism for evaluating MGUS longitudinally, decreasing travel burden, and improving timely access to care for veterans. The majority of MGUS cases triaged for e-consult at our center are low-risk by established criteria and have very low amounts of monoclonal protein. Most of these patients can be followed with routine paraprotein surveillance and deferred skeletal imaging. Timely completion of biomarker studies is critical for appropriate risk-stratification and triage. The use of additional system tools (such as task trackers) to assist with follow-up of outstanding tests may help augment services provided electronically. These observations may be generalizable to other VA centers and other health-care systems where e-consult is becoming more widely adopted. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Author(s):  
Josie A.R. Evans ◽  
Ellen L. Jenner ◽  
Hugh D. Carr Smith ◽  
Oscar Berlanga ◽  
Stephen J. Harding

AbstractAccurate measurement of IgA monoclonal proteins presents a significant challenge to laboratory staff. IgA heavy/light chain (Hevylite, HLC) analysis is an alternative methodology for monoclonal protein assessment, giving an independent measure of IgAκ and IgAλ concentrations. Clonality is assessed by calculating the ratio of involved immunoglobulin to background uninvolved immunoglobulin concentrations (e.g. IgAκ/IgAλ in an IgAκ patient). Here we discuss the challenges faced by the laboratory in IgA monoclonal protein assessment, and compare the performance of Hevylite assays with electrophoresis and total IgA results. We present data which validates the use of Hevylite for response assessment: in most cases, Hevylite provides comparable response assignment to that provided by serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and total IgA; in other cases Hevylite provides additional information, such as detection of residual disease or relapse.


2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (10) ◽  
pp. 1207-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcella Tschautscher ◽  
Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Martha Lacy ◽  
Morie Gertz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document