Method comparison of three serum free light chain assays on the Roche Cobas 6000 c501 chemistry analyzer

Objectives Free light chains (FLC) are important in the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of therapy response of patients with monoclonal gammopathies. In this study, we performed a method comparison of three FLC assays on the Cobas 6000 c501 chemistry analyzer of Roche Diagnostics. Methods Samples of 119 patients with various monoclonal gammopathies and 26 control patients were measured with the Freelite (The Binding Site), Diazyme (Diazyme Laboratories) and KLoneus (Trimero Diagnostics) FLC assays. A method comparison was performed and reference intervals of the three assays were validated. Results The analysis of the Bland-Altman agreement showed bias between the three FLC assays, ranging from −62.7 to 5.1% for κFLC and between −29.2 to 80.5% for λFLC. The Freelite and Diazyme assays have the highest agreement. The concordance of the FLC-ratio ranges from 41 to 75%, with the highest concordance between the Freelite and KLoneus assays. The FLC-ratio in 25 sera from healthy controls were within the reference ranges of the Freelite and KLoneus assays. The FLC-ratio was elevated in all 25 samples tested with the Diazyme assay. Conclusions The agreement for the free light chains is highest between the Freelite and the Diazyme assay and fair for the KLoneus assay. However, concordance of the FLC-ratio is highest when the Freelite and KLoneus assays were compared. Our data suggest that concordance for the Diazyme assay could be improved by recalibration. Because of absolute differences between the three methods in individual patients, none of the three FLC assays can be used interchangeably.

Role of Serum Free Light Chain Assay in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. A Real-Life Unicentric Retrospective Study

Background: In the era of novel drugs a growing number of multiple myeloma (MM) patients are treated until disease progression. Serum free light chain (sFLC) assay is recommended for disease monitoring in oligo-secretory and micromolecular MM. Methods: In this real-life survey, a total of 130 relapsed/refractory MM patients treated at our center with at least three lines were investigated as a retrospective cohort. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 64 years and more than half of patients were male. A total of 24 patients (18%) had oligo-secretory/micromolecular disease at diagnosis. More than 20% of 106 normo-secretory patients had oligo-secretory/micromolecular escape. In order to evaluate potential role of sFLC assay before (“pre”) and after (“post”) every treatment line, involved serum free light chain values (iFLC) less than 138 mg/mL and serum free light chain ratios (FLCr) <25 were identified by using ROC curve analysis. The analysis of the entire cohort throughout four treatment lines demonstrated a statistically significant negative impact on progression-free survival (PFS) for both involved pre-sFLC and its ratio (respectively p = 0.0086 and p = 0.0065). Furthermore, both post-iFLC and post-FLCr greater than the pre-established values had a negative impact on PFS of the study cohort; respectively, p = 0.014 and p = 0.0079. Odds ratio analysis evidenced that patients with both involved post-sFLC greater than 138 mg/mL and post-FLCr above 25 at disease relapse had a higher probability of having clinical relapse (respectively p = 0.026 and p = 0.006). Conclusions: Alterations of sFLC values, namely iFLC and FLCr, both prior to treatment initiation and in the course of therapy at every treatment line, could be of aid in relapse evaluation and treatment outcome. We therefore suggest close periodical monitoring of sFLC assay, independently from secretory status.

The Current Role of the Heavy/Light Chain Assay in the Diagnosis, Prognosis and Monitoring of Multiple Myeloma: An Evidence-Based Approach

Despite tremendous progress being made in recent years, multiple myeloma (MM) remains a challenging disease. The laboratory plays a critical role in the overall management of patients. The diagnosis, prognosis, clinical monitoring and evaluation of the response are key moments in the clinical care process. Conventional laboratory methods have been and continue to be the basis of laboratory testing in monoclonal gammopathies, along with the serum free light chain test. However, more accurate methods are needed to achieve new and more stringent clinical goals. The heavy/light chain assay is a relatively new test which can overcome some of the limitations of the conventional methods for the evaluation of intact immunoglobulin MM patients. Here, we report an update of the evidence accumulated in recent years on this method regarding its use in MM.

Lambda monoclonal free light chain abnormalities detected by a serum immunofixation electrophoresis assay are underrepresented by quantitative serum free light chain results

Protein and immunofixation (IFIX) electrophoresis are used to diagnose and monitor monoclonal gammopathies. While IFIX detects clonal production of intact immunoglobulins and free light chains (FLC), the latter can also be quantified using a serum free light chain (SFLC) assay, in which polyclonal antisera detects epitopes specific for free kappa (KFLC) or lambda light chains (LFLC). An abnormal KFLC: LFLC ratio (KLR) serves as a surrogate for clonality. While the SFLC assay is highly sensitive, normal LFLC (&lt;2.63mg/dL) and KLR results (&gt;0.26 & &lt;1.65) were found in samples with distinct lambda monoclonal free light chains visualized by IFIX (X-LMFLC). To investigate this discordance, contemporaneous SFLC or KLR values were evaluated for their ability to accurately classify monoclonal FLCs identified by IFIX. We performed a retrospective analysis of serum and urine IFIX (Sebia Hydrasys) and SFLC (Freelite®, Binding Site) results from our institution between July 2010 through December 2020, using R 4.0.2 and Tidyverse packages. From among 9,594 encounters in which a single monoclonal component was initially identified by IFIX, 157 X-LMFLC and 131 X-KMFLC samples were analyzed. Elevated LFLC with normal KFLC was identified in 105/157 X-LMFLC samples (67%), while both LFLC and KFLC were elevated in 42/157 samples (27%). Concordance between X-KMFLC and KFLC was markedly higher, where 122/131 samples (93%) displayed elevated kappa FLC (&gt;1.94mg/dL) with normal LFLC, and only 7/131 X-KMFLC samples (5%) possessed both elevated KFLC and LFLC. The use of KLR to identify pathogenic monoclonal free light chains improved lambda concordance to 85%; however, 19/157 (12%) of X-LMFLC samples still exhibited normal KLR. High concordance of 98% was again observed for X-KMFLC with abnormal KLR. When samples were segregated according to normal or impaired renal function (eGFR &gt; or ≤60mL/min/1.73m², respectively), this disparate identification of X-LMFLC and X-KMFLC by the SFLC assay persisted, suggesting that renal dysfunction (as measured by eGFR) does not underlie this phenomenon. Lastly, we corroborated the above findings in a larger sample population by examining patients with urine Bence Jones FLC identified by IFIX who had free or intact monoclonal components in serum (N=724), grouped by lambda or kappa light chain involvement. The cause(s) of the discrepant performance by the Freelite® SFLC assay, relative to the Sebia Hydrasys IFIX assay, for identifying lambda FLC components is currently unclear. Possible contributory factors include assay reference range cutoffs, other patient disease parameters, and differences in assay-specific polyclonal antisera. Future analyses of these factors will help to further characterize SFLC assay performance and elucidate how interpretation of composite serum FLC test results can be improved to better guide patient management.

Evaluation of the siemens N Latex free light chain assay and comparison to Binding Site Freelite™ assay

Introduction/Objective The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) guidelines include serum free light chain (sFLC) level and κ/λ ratio as excellent indicators of clonality. The Binding Site Freelite ™ was the first FDA approved assay for quantitative measurement of sFLC, the assay was based on a mixture of polyclonal antibodies directed against a variety of FLC epitopes. The Siemens N-Latex assay employs a probe mixture of mouse monoclonal antibodies. Both assays can be run on nephelometers. We assessed the analytical performance of the N-Latex assays and compared it with the Freelite™ assays. Methods/Case Report Analytical accuracy, precision, reproducibility and linearity were evaluated according to the regulatory standards. Method comparison was performed with 220 clinical samples for statistic correlation and clinical concordance analysis. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) The N-Latex FLC κ and λ assays had coefficient variation of 1-5% with-in run and 3-8% between run precision. Accuracy was verified using assayed controls in the duration of 21 days. Within analytical measuring range, almost perfect linearity was achieved for both κ and λ FLC assays. In comparison study to Freelite™ with 220 clinical samples, good agreement in classification was observed for κ, λ and κ/λ ratio (Cohen’s κ 0.73, 0.82 and 0.87). Pearson correlation analysis showed correlation coefficient value r &gt;0.90 for all the analytes. Conclusion The N-Latex FLC assay has good analytical performance, did not exhibit gross antigen excess and can be used in clinical practice. However, it showed markedly lower absolute values for κ/λ ratio compared with Freelite™. Our data demonstrated that although good clinical concordance between N-Latex and Freelite™ FLC assays was achieved, the absolute values from the two assay are not interchangeable. Further studies in modification of the assay-specific diagnostic (involved FLC/non-involved FLC) thresholds for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) and multiple myeloma (MM) are needed.

Screening Tests for Early Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma and Related Plasma Cell Disorders

Monoclonal gammopathy (MG) encompasses a diverse group of disorders characterized by the secretion of monoclonal immunoglobulins or their light-chain components. The incidence of multiple myeloma (MM) in South Korea is rapidly increasing, and it is important to be aware of its initial clinical presentations and the most efficient laboratory algorithms for early detection. Serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and urine protein electrophoresis (UPE) are the primary screening tests for patients with clinically suspected MM or amyloid light-chain amyloidosis; these tests are reimbursed in South Korea. We reviewed clinical studies that applied national and international guidelines to evaluate test panels for early detection of MGs, including MM. The serum free light chain (sFLC) with SPE panel is recommended for the initial work up for diagnosis of MGs. In the case of a normal SPE, sFLC should be measured subsequently, so as not to miss the presence of M-protein. Use of this screening panel avoids medical expenses related to delayed diagnosis. Guidelines and recommendations suggest that no single method (SPE, serum immunofixation electrophoresis, sFLC, or UPE) should be used to exclude a diagnosis of MM. We believe that a screening test panel comprising SPE plus sFLC will increase the rate of early and accurate diagnosis of MM and related disorders.