scholarly journals Detection of free light chain monoclonal proteins co-migrating with intact monoclonal proteins in patients with monoclonal gammopathy

Author(s):  
Kate Wetenhall ◽  
Rehana Saleem ◽  
Anthony Rowbottom

Background In a small, but potentially significant proportion of patients with a monoclonal gammopathy, patients show the existence of an intact monoclonal (M-) protein co-migrating with a free light chain (FLC) M-protein. Using traditional methods for detection of monoclonal immunoglobulins, only the intact M-protein may be detectable, and hence the FLC M-proteins may be missed. Methods Immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) using two different sets of antisera were compared (one detecting both free and bound FLC epitopes, and one detecting only the free FLC epitopes), alongside urine protein electrophoresis and the Freelite assay in order to ascertain the best methods of detecting both types of M-proteins in this subset of patients. Results A total of 2% of the patient population tested were shown to have a FLC M-protein migrating coincidentally with an intact M-protein. These were not detected by IFE using the widely utilised antisera to both free and bound FLC epitopes, and hence may have been missed during routine testing, but were detectable using the other methods. Conclusions This study highlights the important finding that in some patients with both an intact and a FLC M-protein, the FLC M-protein may be missed during routine testing. In incidences where no corresponding urine sample is sent to the laboratory alongside the serum sample, we would suggest testing for the presence of FLC M-proteins in this subset of patients using the Freelite assay, if no urine sample can be obtained, to ensure all FLC M-proteins are appropriately detected.


Author(s):  
Richard B Fulton ◽  
Suran L Fernando

Background The potential for serum free light chain (sFLC) assay measurements to replace urine electrophoresis (uEPG) and to also diminish the need for serum immunofixation (sIFE) in the screening for monoclonal gammopathy was assessed. A testing algorithm for monoclonal protein was developed based on our data and cost analysis. Methods Data from 890 consecutive sFLC requests were retrospectively analysed. These included 549 samples for serum electrophoresis (sEPG), 447 for sIFE, and 318 for uEPG and urine immunofixation (uIFE). A total of 219 samples had sFLC, sEPG, sIFE and uEPG + uIFE performed. The ability of different test combinations to detect the presence of monoclonal proteins was compared. Results The sFLC κ/ λ ratio (FLC ratio) indicated monoclonal light chains in 12% more samples than uEPG + uIFE. The combination of sEPG and FLC ratio detected monoclonal proteins in 49% more samples than the combination of sEPG and sIFE. Furthermore, the sEPG + FLC ratio combination detected monoclonal protein in 6% more samples than were detected by the combined performance of sEPG, sIFE, uEPG and uIFE. However, non-linearity of the assay, the expense of repeat determinations due to the narrow measuring ranges, and frequent antigen excess checks were found to be limitations of the sFLC assay in this study. Conclusion The FLC ratio is a more sensitive method than uIFE in the detection of monoclonal light chains and may substantially reduce the need for onerous 24 h urine collections. Our proposed algorithm for the evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy incorporates the sFLC assay, resulting in a reduction in the performance of labour intensive sIFE and uEPG + uIFE while still increasing the detection of monoclonal proteins.



Author(s):  
Maria A.V. Willrich ◽  
Jerry A. Katzmann

AbstractMonoclonal immunoglobulins are markers of plasma cell proliferative diseases and have been described as the first (and perhaps best) serological tumor marker. The unique structure of each monoclonal protein makes them highly specific for each plasma cell clone. The difficulties of using monoclonal proteins for diagnosing and monitoring multiple myeloma, however, stem from the diverse disease presentations and broad range of serum protein concentrations and molecular weights. Because of these challenges, no single test can confidently diagnose or monitor all patients. Panels of tests have been recommended for sensitivity and efficiency. In this review we discuss the various disease presentations and the use of various tests such as protein electrophoresis and immunofixation electrophoresis as well as immunoglobulin quantitation, free light chain quantitation, and heavy-light chain quantitation by immuno-nephelometry. The choice of tests for inclusion in diagnostic and monitoring panels may need to be tailored to each patient, and examples are provided. The panel currently recommended for diagnostic screening is serum protein electrophoresis, immunofixation electrophoresis, and free light chain quantitation.



Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5011-5011
Author(s):  
Jerry A. Katzmann ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Robert Kyle ◽  
Melissa R. Snyder ◽  
Mathew F. Plevak ◽  
...  

Abstract Due to the diagnostic sensitivity of serum free light chain quantitation for monoclonal light chain diseases, it has been suggested that urine assays no longer need be performed as part of the diagnostic algorithm for monoclonal proteins. We reviewed our experience to determine the relative diagnostic contribution of urine assays. Methods: Patients with a monoclonal gammopathy and monoclonal urinary protein at initial diagnosis who also had a serum immunofixation and serum free light chain quantitation within 30 days of diagnosis were identified (n = 428). The laboratory results for serum protein electrophoresis, serum immunofixation, serum free light chain, urine protein electrophoresis, and urine immunofixation were reviewed. Results: The patients in this cohort had diagnoses of multiple myeloma, primary amyloid, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering multiple myeloma, solitary plasmacytomas, and other less frequently detected monoclonal gammopathies. By definition of the cohort, all 428 had a monoclonal urine protein. 86% had an abnormal serum free light chain K/L ratio, 81% had an abnormal serum protein electrophoresis, and 94% had an abnormal serum immunofixation. In only 2 patients, however, were all 3 serum assays normal. Both of these were patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (idiopathic Bence Jones proteinuria). Conclusion: Discontinuation of urine studies and reliance on a diagnostic algorithm using solely serum studies (protein electrophoresis, immunofixation, and free light chain quantitation), missed 2 of the 428 monoclonal gammopathies (0.5 %) with urinary monoclonal proteins, and these 2 cases required no medical intervention.



Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 5018-5018
Author(s):  
Anandram Seetharam ◽  
Tracy Lovatt ◽  
Alan Macwhannell ◽  
Abe Jacob ◽  
Sunil Honda ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5018 Introduction Historically, serum protein electrophoresis (SPE), urine protein electrophoresis (UPE) and immunofixation (IFE) have been used to identify and quantify monoclonal proteins (M-proteins). Whilst this approach is adequate for the identification of intact immunoglobulin multiple myeloma (MM), it is not sensitive enough to detect free light chain MM (LCMM). Therefore, an algorithm which utilises SPE, serum free light chain (FLC) immunoassays and IFE for the identification of M-proteins has been suggested. Assays have now been developed which utilise polyclonal antisera raised against the kappa and lambda light chain types of IgG, IgA and IgM immunoglobulins (HLC). Here we report the use of these assays as an alternative to IFE and propose a screening algorithm which utilises SPE, FLC and HLC Materials and Methods Serum FLC measurement was added to 1063 requests for SPE, from primary care or from a hospital source. Samples from patients with previously diagnosed MM, Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia and lymphoma were, where possible, removed. Sera showing monoclonal proteins or hypogammaglobulinemia (by SPE) or an abnormal FLC ratio were tested further by IFE and IgG, IgA, IgM HLC assays. SPE and IFE were performed on a SEBIA Hydrasys system, and gels were interpreted by experienced clinical chemists. FLC and HLC measurements were performed on a Siemens BN™II nephelometer. HLC results were compared with IFE results and clinical diagnoses. The study was approved by the Wolverhampton, New Cross, NHS Trust Review Board Results 80/1063 patients were identified as having abnormal SPE or abnormal FLC results. 42/80 patients had positive IFE results. 24/42 of these patients were positive by HLC (Table 1), 11/42 had light chain only myeloma/MGUS, the remaining 7/42 were MGUS patients. The 7 MGUS patients (6 IgG and 1 IgM) with normal HLC ratios and positive IFE all had less than 2g/L monoclonal protein measured by SPE densitometry and a normal FLC ratio. Of the 38/80 with normal IFE's all had been investigated further because of abnormal FLC results. 9/38 had abnormal HLC ratios of which 3/9 had confirmed hematological malignancies (1× chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 1× small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) and 1× asymptomatic MM (ASMM)). The use of FLC immunoassays alongside SPE as part of the primary screening protocol identified 10 additional hematological malignancies (1× ASMM, 6×CLL, 2× non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 1× SLL). Discussion HLC ratio analysis matched IFE for the identification of all symptomatic haematological malignancies. Abnormal FLC ratios identified 10 additional haematological malignancies of which 3 also had abnormal HLC ratios, which would have been missed using SPE/ IFE. In 7/19 MGUS (6×IgG, 1×IgM) patients there were normal HLC ratios. In all cases the monoclonal protein load was below 2g/L and the FLC ratio was normal; identifying the IgG patients as having a low risk and the IgM patient as having a low/intermediate risk of progression. It may be beneficial not to identify these patients, who do not require therapeutic intervention or justify close monitoring. Another advantage of using HLC analysis instead of IFE is that the HLC ratio has been found to be a prognostic indicator in myeloma and MGUS. It would also form a useful “baseline” comparison if HLC assays were used in monitoring or for the detection of residual disease. Conclusions HLC analysis identified all symptomatic patients who were IFE positive and in an additional 3 hematological malignancies. Low risk MGUS patients may not be identified using these tests but this might be beneficial to patients and physicians alike Disclosures: Harding: Binding Site Group Ltd: Employment.



Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingemar Turesson ◽  
Stephanie A. Kovalchik ◽  
Ruth M. Pfeiffer ◽  
Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson ◽  
Lynn R. Goldin ◽  
...  

Key Points Free light chain ratio, M-protein concentration, and immunosuppression predict progression of MGUS to lymphoid malignancies.



Author(s):  
David F. Keren ◽  
Lee Schroeder

AbstractThe measurement of monoclonal protein (M-protein) is vital for stratifying risk and following individuals with a variety of monoclonal gammopathies. Direct measurement of the M-protein spike by electrophoresis and immunochemical measurements of specific isotypes or free light chains pairs has provided useful information about the quantity of M-protein. Nonetheless, both traditional electrophoresis and immunochemical methods give poor quantification with M-proteins smaller than 10 g/L (1 g/dL) when in the presence of polyclonal immunoglobulins that co-migrate with the M-protein. In addition, measurements by electrophoresis of M-proteins migrating in the β- and α-regions are contaminated by normal serum proteins in those regions. The most precise electrophoretic method to date for quantification involves exclusion of the polyclonal immunoglobulins by using the tangent skimming method on electropherograms, which provides a 10-fold improvement in precision. So far, however, tangent measurements are limited to γ migrating M-proteins. Another way to improve M-protein measurements is the use of capillary electrophoresis (CE). With CE, one can employ immunosubtraction to select a region of interest in the β region thereby excluding much of the normal proteins from the M-protein measurement. Recent development of an immunochemical method distinguishing heavy/light chain pairs (separately measuring IgGK and IgGL, IgAK and IgAL, and IgMK and IgML) provides measurements that could exclude polyclonal contaminants of the same heavy chain with the uninvolved light chain type. Yet, even heavy/light results contain an immeasurable quantity of polyclonal heavy/light chains of the involved isotype. Finally, use of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) looms on the horizon as a means to provide more consistent and sensitive measurements of M-proteins.



Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 5121-5121 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Vickrey ◽  
S. Allen ◽  
J. Krishnamurthy ◽  
V. Singh ◽  
J. Mehta ◽  
...  

Abstract During treatment, patients with myeloma can develop restricted bands in the serum or urine that are different from the original M protein on serum (SIFE) and urine (UIFE) immunofixation electrophoresis. These so-called oligoclonal bands represent transient aberrant recovery of the immune system, and are not associated with any adverse implications. Unless SIFE/UIFE are checked and the bands identified as oligoclonal, a mistaken diagnosis of persistent or recurrent disease may be made. It is not known if the pattern of serum free light chain (SFLC) levels helps differentiate between oligoclonal bands and persistent/recurrent M protein. Data on 219 myeloma patients with serial follow-up were evaluated to identify 3537 encounters which fulfilled the following criteria: available SFLC levels, and 1 or more restricted bands identified on SIFE or UIFE. Patients with non-secretory and biclonal disease were excluded. If a heavy or light chain not part of the original M protein was seen, the presence of an oligoclonal band was diagnosed. If the original M protein was identified intact (e.g. the detection of IgG kappa in a patient with IgG kappa myeloma) or its constituent heavy or light chain were identified in an unbound fashion (e.g. the detection of free IgG or free kappa in a patient with IgG kappa myeloma), the original M protein was felt to be present. Results with oligoclonal bands were further characterized by the additional presence or absence of the original M protein. Only the original M protein was seen in 2661 (75%), 352 (10%) had oligoclonal bands without the original M protein, and an oligoclonal band was seen with the original M protein in 524 (15%). The SFLC ratio was normal (0.26–1.65) in 1306 (37%) and abnormal in 2231 (63%). The relationship of the nature of the restricted bands seen with the SFLC ratio was assessed in two ways in preliminary analysis. In the first, the SFLC ratio was classified as normal or abnormal. In the second, abnormal ratios were classified further as concordant (<0.26 for lambda disease and >1.65 for kappa disease) or discordant (<0.26 for kappa disease and >1.65 for lambda disease). Discordant ratios were grouped with normal because they did not reflect an excess of the abnormal light chain associated with the original M protein. The following table shows the relationship between the nature of the restricted bands and the SFLC ratio: SFLC ratio SFLC ratio Restricted band category Normal Abnormal Normal or discordant abnormal Concordant abnormal Original M protein only 843 (32%) 1818(68%) 919 (35%) 1742 (65%) Oligoclonal band(s) only 185 (53%) 167(47%) 215 (61%) 137 (39%) Oligoclonal band(s) with original M protein 278 (53%) 246 (47%) 302 (58%) 222 (42%) P <0.0001 <0.0001 As the table shows, the SFLC ratio was normal significantly more frequently when oligoclonal bands were present. This appeared to be unaffected by the presence of bands resembling the original M protein. As the SFLC ratio can be affected by treatment-induced suppression of the uninvolved free light chain, the data were also analyzed as follows: concordant abnormal SFLC ratio with elevated involved free light chain (1890; 53%) versus the rest (1647; 47%). Finally, based on the hypothesis that elevated uninvolved free light chain levels are less likely to be seen with active disease, readings with elevated uninvolved free light chains were transferred from the former category into the latter. The following table shows the relationship between the nature of the restricted bands and the above categories: SFLC ratio SFLC ratio Restricted band category Normal (All others) Abnormal (Concordant abnormal with elevated involved free light chain) Normal (All others) Abnormal (Concordant abnormal with elevated involved free light chain; excluding elevated uninvolved free light chain) Original M protein only 1246 (47%) 1415 (53%) 1299 (49%) 1362 (51%) Oligoclonal band(s) only 247 (70%) 105 (30%) 257 (73%) 95 (27%) Oligoclonal band(s) with original M protein 343 (65%) 181 (35%) 361 (69%) 163 (31%) P <0.0001 <0.0001 Once again, as the table shows, the SFLC ratio was normal (or equivalent of normal) significantly more often when oligoclonal bands were present. We conclude that the SFLC ratio is significantly more likely to be normal when oligoclonal bands are present in patients with myeloma. However, the differences between patients with and without oligoclonal bands are not definitive enough to predict the nature of the bands seen. SIFE and UIFE remain the only definitive means of identifying the nature of the restricted bands seen in patients with myeloma on therapy.



2019 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 42-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osman Evliyaoglu ◽  
Josef van Helden ◽  
Sabine Jaruschewski ◽  
Matthias Imöhl ◽  
Ralf Weiskirchen


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 673-673
Author(s):  
Nicholas Burwick ◽  
Jacob Stein ◽  
David A Garcia ◽  
Virginia C. Broudy ◽  
Robert E. Richard

Abstract Introduction : Non-visit electronic consultation (e-consult) is an important component of care for veterans in the VA healthcare system who require sub-specialty consultation but not urgent face to face evaluation. Since the majority of patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) are low-risk of disease transformation, we reasoned that e-consult would be a safe and effective way to manage MGUS in most cases. Here we sought to characterize our current e-consult practice patterns for the surveillance of MGUS and identify key questions for future investigation. Methods : We performed a retrospective analysis of our electronic consult database from 1/1/2010-12/31/2014 to identify cases of monoclonal gammopathy. Monoclonal gammopathy was confirmed on chart review by an attending hematologist. To be included in the analysis, a patient had to have either 1) a monoclonal protein by serum or urine protein electrophoresis (SPEP/UPEP) or immunofixation or 2) abnormal serum free light chain (FLC) ratio, using a normal reference range of 0.26-1.65, with an increase in the involved light chain. Pertinent clinical and demographic data was abstracted and was used to analyze outcomes among the cohort. Results : We screened 3,217 electronic hematology consults to identify a cohort of 152 MGUS patients triaged for e-consult over a five-year period. E-consult services were provided for veterans from 23 different counties with an average time to completion of 3.4 days. The average size of monoclonal (M) protein was 0.25 g/dL (0-1.5 g/dL). 84% of patients had an M-protein concentration less than 0.5 g/dL. Following completion of risk-stratification studies, 113/121 (93%) of patients with available risk scores were lower risk for disease progression (0-1 risk factors). There were 11 cases with negative SPEP for whom a risk score could not be calculated. An additional 20 cases had a positive SPEP without available free light chain data. A minority of patients (29%) had FLC data available at the time of consult. At 3-months post-consult, 71% had completed FLC testing. One-third of patients had an abnormal hemoglobin (hgb) and 41% had an abnormal creatinine (cr) using the normal reference ranges. However, 96% of MGUS e-consults had a hgb >10 g/dL and 90% had a cr <2 mg/dL. Among those tested (n=91), one patient had skeletal abnormalities concerning for myelomatous bone disease on initial screening. One-third of cases utilized multiple e-consult encounters over time, while 15% of MGUS e-consults ultimately required a face-to-face visit with hematology. With an average follow-up of 47 months (median 44 months), there were 6 documented progression events, representing a mean rate of progression of 1% per year (Figure). Conclusions : We find that electronic consultation is a helpful mechanism for evaluating MGUS longitudinally, decreasing travel burden, and improving timely access to care for veterans. The majority of MGUS cases triaged for e-consult at our center are low-risk by established criteria and have very low amounts of monoclonal protein. Most of these patients can be followed with routine paraprotein surveillance and deferred skeletal imaging. Timely completion of biomarker studies is critical for appropriate risk-stratification and triage. The use of additional system tools (such as task trackers) to assist with follow-up of outstanding tests may help augment services provided electronically. These observations may be generalizable to other VA centers and other health-care systems where e-consult is becoming more widely adopted. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.



Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3136-3136 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P Campbell ◽  
Ann E Stride ◽  
Annamaria Brioli ◽  
Margaret Goodall ◽  
Gareth J Morgan ◽  
...  

Abstract Free light chain (FLC) testing in serum is a more sensitive method of monitoring FLC secretion from myeloma cells than FLC testing in urine because FLC do not appear in urine until their secretion exceeds the renal tubule threshold for FLC reabsorption. Serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) are insensitive methods of detecting FLC in serum. In 2002 quantitative detection of serum FLC by turbidimetric and nephelometric assays using polyclonal sheep anti-sera specific for FLC (Freelite®) became available; this has become the internationally recommended method of measuring FLC levels in serum. Two thirds of non-secretory (NS) patients who are IFE negative in serum and urine have abnormal FLC levels in serum and might be better classified as oligosecretory light chain only (LCO) patients. Serum FLC testing is particularly useful in diagnosis and monitoring of these and conventional LCO patients in whom FLC are detectable in urine when their disease is very active. In 5% IgG and 10% IgA M-protein myeloma patients, relapse is characterised by an increase in abnormal serum FLC without a corresponding increase in whole M-protein, termed ‘free light chain escape’ and their relapse is detected earliest by serum FLC testing. Despite the clinical advantages of serum FLC testing, existing quantitative serum FLC assays are restricted to centralised laboratories. The time between venesection and availability of FLC results, for most clinicians, varies from days to weeks. This delays diagnosis and delays changes in clinical management when assessing response or monitoring for relapse. We have developed a second generation of serum FLC tests that utilise monoclonal rather than polyclonal anti-FLC antibodies. One result of this new generation of assays has been the development of a new rapid serum FLC test (Seralite®, Serascience Ltd, Oxford UK) that provides point of care measurement of serum FLC levels in just ten minutes. We assessed FLC levels at diagnosis, remission and relapse in 31 patients diagnosed with intact immunoglobulin myeloma who relapsed with abnormal serum FLC but without an increase in M-protein level (termed ‘light chain escape’). In all evaluable samples, Seralite® detected an abnormal serum FLC level at diagnosis, followed by a normalisation of the serum FLC ratio during remission, and a subsequent abnormal FLC level at relapse. Seralite® FLC results correlated diagnostically with the existing laboratory serum FLC assay for all samples. Additionally, we analysed FLC levels at diagnosis, remission and relapse in 166 myeloma patients characterised as having no intact immunoglobulin M-protein by serum IFE at diagnosis. 16% had a negative urine IFE and were identified only by the presence of an abnormal FLC ratio in their serum (NS or oligosecretory LCO). The remaining 84% had FLC detected in urine by IFE at diagnosis (conventional LCO). All diagnosis samples had an imbalanced FLC ratio detected by Seralite®. With a median follow-up of over 5 years, 83% of these patients relapsed with abnormal serum FLC levels. Half of the conventional LCO patients were IFE negative in the urine at relapse. Seralite® FLC results correlated diagnostically with the existing laboratory FLC assay for all samples. In summary, Seralite® detected abnormal serum FLC levels in all myeloma patients relapsing with light chain escape, and patients relapsing with non-secretory (oligosecretory LCO) and conventional LCO myeloma. There were no false negatives and no false positives supporting the use of Seralite® for the monitoring of these distinct myeloma patient groups. Disclosures: Campbell: Serascience Ltd: Equity Ownership. Stride:Serascience Ltd: Employment. Goodall:Serascience Ltd: Equity Ownership. Drayson:Serascience Ltd: Equity Ownership.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document