Phase I Study of Eltrombopag for Promoting Thrombopoiesis in Patients Undergoing Stem Cell Transplantation After Total Body Irradiation,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3295-3295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane L. Liesveld ◽  
Gordon L. Phillips ◽  
Michael W. Becker ◽  
Louis Constine ◽  
Jonathan Friedberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3295 Purpose: Prolonged intervals of thrombocytopenia are common after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and platelet transfusions are the only effective therapy. Risk of thrombocytopenia is greater in patients (pts) receiving total body irradiation (TBI) in their conditioning regimen. Eltrombopag (ePag) is a small-molecule, nonpeptide oral agent that functions as an agonist of the thrombopoietin receptor. It is approved by FDA for the treatment of chronic ITP and is being developed as a treatment for thrombocytopenia of other various etiologies. We report results of an ongoing Phase I clinical trial assessing the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of once daily oral ePag in pts undergoing HSCT with a conditioning regimen containing TBI ≥ 400 cGy. Methods: A Phase I dose-escalation clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and PK of ePag at 4 different dose levels: 75, 150, 225, and 300 mg, once daily for 27 days, starting 24–48 hours post HSCT to eligible pts ≥18 yrs old. Pts with various indications for stem cell transplantation, KPS ≥70%, and TBI ≥ 400 cGy were eligible. Pts receiving either an autologous (Auto) or allogeneic (Allo) HSCT from a sibling, related donor, or matched unrelated donor (MUD) were eligible. Stem cells from peripheral blood (PBSC) or bone marrow were permitted; however, cord blood transplant was not permitted. Pts at risk of thromboembolism, or with a history of thromboembolic disease in the preceding 6 months, were excluded. PK sampling was obtained over a 24 h period after the first dose of ePag, as well as during the second week of treatment (steady-state). Results: As of July 1 2011, a total of 10 subjects (4 AML, 2 lymphoma, 1 CML, 1 MDS, 1 myelofibrosis, and 1 CLL/SLL) were enrolled, and 9 completed protocol treatments. All 9 were PBSC transplants with 6 MUD, 2 Allo and 1 Auto. Three subjects were completed at each dose level up to 225 mg. Enrollment is continuing at the 300 mg dose level. To date, 6/9 are alive while 3/9 died of non-relapse related causes (CMV pneumonitis and respiratory failure in 1, and steroid refractory GI GvHD in 2, f/u interval: 4.4 – 6.9 mo). No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) have been observed. Most common adverse events up to 225 mg dose level were related to standard stem cell transplantation, which included low blood counts, fatigue, headache, diarrhea, nausea, peripheral edema, hypoalbuminemia, hyperglycemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia. There were 9 SAEs observed in 5 pts, which included infection (3/9), pulmonary embolism (PE) (1/9), acute renal failure (2/9), gastrointestinal (2/9), and ARDS (1/9). Most SAEs were considered unrelated or unlikely related to ePag treatment except for the PE, which was considered possibly related to ePag but not considered a DLT. This subject had other risk factors for PE and the PE occurred 9 days after ePag had stopped at a platelet count of 252K. Time to platelet engraftment and number of platelet transfusions were documented for each enrolled pt. PK sampling demonstrated a dose dependent increase in plasma concentration of ePag (Figure 1). PK parameters for the 75, 150, and 225 mg dose levels are summarized in Table 1. Conclusions: 27-day once daily dosing of ePag to enhance platelet recovery for post-transplant thrombocytopenia is well tolerated, with no DLTs observed up to the 225 mg dose level to date. Most AEs were transplant related. PK and the plasma exposure of ePag appears dose proportional over the studied dose range after single-dose and steady-state administration. Once-daily administration of up to 225 mg ePag for the transplant population receiving TBI ≥ 400 cGy as part of the conditioning regimen appears to be safe and well tolerated. Acknowledgment: The study is supported by Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Agency (BARDA), and by GlaxoSmithKline who also provided the study drug. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Promacta (eltrombopag) is an oral TPO Receptor agonist approved for the treatment of chronic ITP. The study being reported in this abstract is a phase I MTD study to evaluate eltrombopag for promoting thrombopoiesis in patients undergoing Stem Cell Transplantation after Total Body Irradiation. Dawson:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 219-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane L. Liesveld ◽  
Gordon L. Phillips ◽  
Michael W. Becker ◽  
Louis Constine ◽  
Jonathan W. Friedberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 219 Purpose: Prolonged intervals of thrombocytopenia are common after stem cell transplantation, and platelet transfusions are the only temporary therapy before engraftment. Risk of thrombocytopenia is greater in patients receiving total body irradiation (TBI) in their conditioning regimen. Eltrombopag is a small-molecule, nonpeptide oral agent that functions as an agonist of the thrombopoietin receptor. It is approved by the FDA for the treatment of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and is being developed as a treatment for thrombocytopenia of other various etiologies. We report updated results of a Phase I clinical trial assessing the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of once daily oral eltrombopag in patients undergoing stem cell transplantation with a conditioning regimen containing TBI ≥ 400 cGy. Methods: A Phase I dose-escalation clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and PK of eltrombopag at 4 different dose levels: 75, 150, 225, and 300 mg given once daily for 27 days, starting 24–48 hours post stem cell transplantation to eligible patients ≥18 years old. Patients with various indications for stem cell transplantation, KPS ≥70%, and TBI ≥ 400 cGy were eligible. Patients receiving either an autologous (Auto) or allogeneic (Allo) stem cell transplantation from a sibling, related donor, or matched unrelated donor (MUD) were eligible. Stem cells from peripheral blood (PBSC) or bone marrow were permitted; however, cord blood stem cell transplantation was not permitted. Patients at risk of thromboembolism or with a history of thromboembolic disease in the preceding 6 months were excluded. PK sampling was obtained over a 24 hour period after the first dose of eltrombopag as well as during the second week of treatment (steady-state). Results: As of August 1 2012, a total of 19 subjects (7 AML, 4 lymphoma, 1 CML, 1 MDS, 1 myelofibrosis, 2 ALL, 1 APML, 1 Biphenotypic Leukemia and 1 CLL/SLL) were enrolled, and 15 completed protocol treatments. All 19 were PBSC transplants with 12 MUD, 6 Allo and 1 Auto. Three subjects were completed at each dose level up to 225 mg with six completing treatment at the highest dose of 300mg. Four subjects were replaced because drug compliance was less than 75%. To date, 11/19 are alive while 8/19 have died (3 related to graft vs. host disease (GVHD), 3 Infection-related and 2 related to disease progression (f/u interval: 5.7 – 30 months). No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) have been observed. The most common adverse events (AEs) up to the 300 mg dose level were related to standard stem cell transplantation, which included low blood counts, fatigue, headache, diarrhea, nausea, peripheral edema, hypoalbuminemia, hyperglycemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia. Possibly drug-related AEs were dry skin, rash, elevated creatinine, and hypokalemia; these were all grade 3 or less. There were 12 severe AEs observed in 8 subjects, which included infection (3/19), pulmonary embolism (PE) (1/19), acute renal failure (3/19), gastrointestinal (2/19), acute respiratory distress syndrome (1/19), pericarditis (1/19) and GvHD skin rash (1/19). Most SAEs were considered related to stem cell transplant, except one subject at 75 mg with PE possibly related to eltrombopag, but also possibly related to stem cell transplant and cancer diagnosis. The PE occurred 9 days after stopping eltrombopag at which time platelet count was 252K. Time to platelet engraftment and number of platelet transfusions were also documented for each enrolled patient. Median time to platelet engraftment for all subjects on this study was 16 days. PK data are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 1. A dose-dependent increase in plasma exposure of eltrombopag was observed; although some saturation of absorption is evident at the 300 mg dose level. (Figure 1). Conclusions: 27-day once daily dosing of eltrombopag to enhance platelet recovery for post-transplant thrombocytopenia is well tolerated, with no DLTs observed up to the 300 mg dose level. Most AEs were transplant related. PK showed proportional plasma concentration up to 225 mg daily dosing, with some saturation of drug absorption above 225 mg. Disclosures: Liesveld: Eisai: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Eltrombopag not approved post-transplant. Dawson:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment.


Author(s):  
Mayuresh D. Virkar ◽  
Rajkumar Chauhan ◽  
Pranav Chadha ◽  
Kaustav Talapatra ◽  
Reuben Jake Rodrigues ◽  
...  

Background: The use of total body radiation (TBI) before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) would increase the engraftment without transplant-related morbidity or mortality among Thalassemia major (TM) cases. Case presentation: A 2-year-old female child, diagnosed with TM was scheduled for haploidentical allogenic transplant-based protocol, and after that, based on protocol she was scheduled to undergo a single session of TBI as a conditioning regimen before haploidentical allogenic hematopoietic stem cell tranplant. A total dose of 4 Gy was administered.. The incidence of graft failure was reduced as TBI was used before allogeneic stem cell transplantation. TBI provided a uniform dose of radiation to the entire body, penetrating areas such as the central nervous system (CNS) and testes. Conclusion: Total Body Irradiation with the SAD technique is the most effective way of treatment. As it is comfortable for the patient to undergo, easily reproducible, and it helps to achieve a uniform dose distribution.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (28) ◽  
pp. 3549-3556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnon Nagler ◽  
Vanderson Rocha ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Ali Unal ◽  
Tarek Ben Othman ◽  
...  

Purpose Cyclophosphamide (Cy) combined with total-body irradiation (TBI) or with busulfan (Bu) are currently the most common myeloablative regimens used in allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT) in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Intravenous (IV) Bu has more predictable bioavailability and a safer toxicity profile than the oral formulation. Comparative studies of outcomes have been performed between oral Bu/Cy and Cy/TBI, but there have been no comparative trials in the era of IV Bu. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective registry-based study comparing outcomes of patients with AML in first or second remission after alloSCT from sibling donors who underwent IV Bu/Cy (n = 795) or Cy/TBI (n = 864) conditioning. Results Engraftment rate was 98% and 99% after IV Bu/Cy and Cy/TBI, respectively. Grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was significantly lower in the IV Bu/Cy compared with Cy/TBI group (P < .001). Similarly, chronic GVHD was significantly lower in the IV Bu/Cy compared with Cy/TBI group (P = .003). Cumulative incidence of 2-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM; ± standard deviation [SD]) was 12% ± 1% in the IV Bu/Cy group and 15% ± 2% in the Cy/TBI group (P = .14), and 2-year relapse incidence (RI; ± SD) was 26% ± 3% and 21% ± 1%, respectively (P = .012). Leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate (± SD) was 61% ± 2% after IV Bu/Cy and 64% ± 2% after Cy/TBI (P = .27). In multivariable analysis, adjusting for differences between both groups, patients who received IV Bu/Cy had lower acute and chronic GVHD, higher RI, and a trend toward lower NRM. LFS was not statistically different between the two conditioning regimens. Conclusion This retrospective study shows that final outcomes after myeloablative conditioning using IV Bu/Cy were not statistically different from those after Cy/TBI.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3074-3074
Author(s):  
Dominik L.D. Selleslag ◽  
Melanny Hidajat ◽  
Jan Van Droogenbroeck ◽  
Achiel Van Hoof ◽  
Johan Billiet ◽  
...  

Abstract Experience with haploidentical stem cell transplantation in elderly patients after non TBI (total body irradiation) containing regimens is limited. We report a single centre experience with haploidentical stem cell transplantation in 16 patients with poor prognosis myeloid and lymphoid malignancies refractory to conventional therapy or relapsing after autologous stem cell transplantation. For none of these patients a HLA matched related or unrelated donor was available. All patients were transplanted between April 2004 and May 2007. Age was between 16 and 71 yrs (median 57 yrs), 11 of 16 were more than 50 yrs old. Of the 16 patients 3 had lymphoid malignancies (1 Hodgkin, 1 myeloma, 1 Phi+ ALL) and 13 had high risk MDS (myelodysplasia) or primary or secondary AML. All patients had relapsed after or were refractory to conventional chemotherapy (11 patients) or had relapsed after autologous stem cell transplantation (5 patients). All patients were prepared with a conditioning regimen consisting of Thiotepa 2 × 5 mg/kg on day −8, ATG Fresenius 5 mg/kg on days −7 to −3, Fludarabine 40 mg/m2 on days −7 to −3, Melphalan 100–140 mg/m2 on days −2. CD34 selection was by Clinimacs without postgrafting GVHD prophylaxis. Grafts contained a median of 9,8 × 106 CD34/kg (range 3,3–16,6 × 106/kg) and a median of 0,11 × 105 CD3/kg (range 0,04–0,3 × 105/kg). All donors were haploidentical family members. 13 of 16 donor-recipient pairs had at least one KIR ligand mismatch in the GVH (graft versus host) direction. Graft rejection occurred in 2 of 16 transplants, 1 patient was rescued with a second transplant from another haploidentical donor. All surviving patients are full chimeras (> 95% donor chimerism). Median time to ANC > 0.5 x10 9/l was 12,5 days (range 7–18 days) and median time to platelets > 50 × 109/l was 21,5 days (range 14–199 days). 5 of 16 patients died before they achieved a platelet count > 50 × 109/l. Non relapse mortality occurred in 4 of 16 (25%) patients within 1 year after transplantation. Causes of death were: aspergillosis 1, VOD 1, CNS bleeding 1, cGVHD 1. Acute GVHD grade II-IV occurred in 3 patients and was manageable with steroids and/or ATG. Chronic GVHD was observed in 3 patients (after DLI in 2 of them). Infections were the most important complication: aspergillosis in 7 patients, CMV in 4 patients, listeria meningitis in 1 patient. EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disease was seen in 2 patients, both responded to rituximab and DLI (donor lymphocyte infusions). Disease progression and relapse occurred in 6 patients within 1 year after transplantation (myeloma 1, AML 5). None of the relapsing patients responded to escalating doses of DLI. At the time of this report 8 of 16 patients are surviving, 6 of them without evidence of disease between 159 and 1214 days (median 425 days) after transplantation. Of the 6 disease free survivors 4 are older than 50 yrs and 5 have a KIR ligand mismatch in the GVH direction. Kaplan Meier estimate for overall survival and disease free survival is 43% at 2 yrs and 39% at 2 yrs respectively. We conclude that transplantation from natural killer (NK) alloreactive haploidentical family donors offers potential cure to about one third of elderly patients with advanced leukemia or MDS considered incurable by other therapies. TBI does not seem to be required to benefit from this treatment approach. Relapse rate and infectious morbidity remain major obstacles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document