The BCR-ABL Transcript Levels At 3 and 6 Months Predict the Long-Term Outcome of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated Frontline with Imatinib Mesylate: A Gimema CML WP Analysis

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1678-1678
Author(s):  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Giorgina Specchia ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Transcript Levels

Abstract Abstract 1678 Background. Imatinib mesylate (IM) is the therapeutic standard for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but nilotinib and dasatinib, at least in selected patients, have the potential to replace it. The early prediction of poor outcome is important to optimize the treatment strategy. In IM-treated patients, BCR-ABL transcript levels according to the International Scale (IS) > 10% at 3 and > 1% at 6 months were able to identify high-risk groups (Marin et al, JClinOncol 2011; Hanfstein et al, Leukemia 2012). Similar analysis were performed within the IM arms of the ENESTnd trial (Hochhaus et al, EHA 2012) and the DASISION trial (Jabbour et al, EHA 2012). Methods. To investigate the prognostic impact of BCR-ABLIS levels at 3 and 6 months on the future response status and the long-term outcome of CML patients treated frontline with IM, we analyzed 559 patients enrolled within 3 trials of the GIMEMA CML WP (ClinTrialsGov NCT00514488/NCT00510926, observational trial CML023). Patients with evaluable QPCR sample at 3 and 6 months: 487/559 (87%) and 492/559 (88%), respectively. Definitions: major molecular response (MMR): BCR-ABLIS ratio <0.1%; molecular response with 4.0-log reduction (MR4.0): BCR-ABLIS <0.01%; failures: according to 2009 ELN recommendations. The rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) and MMR at 1 year, the rate of MR4.0 at 2 years, the failure-free survival (FFS), the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) according to the BCR-ABL transcript levels (≤10% vs >10 and ≤1% vs >1%) at 3 and 6 months were analyzed. Patients with events or censored within 3 or 6 months were excluded from the respective analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used for descriptive purposes. Results. Median age: 52 years (range 18–84). IM dose: 76% 400mg, 24% 800mg. Sokal score: 39% low, 39% intermediate, 22% high; EUTOS score: 93% low, 7% high. Median follow-up: 76 months (range: 7–99); 95% of patients had at least 5-year observation. BCR-ABLIS at 3 months: ≤1% in 336/487 (69%), >1% to ≤10% in 120/487 (25%) and >10% in 31/487 (6%). BCR-ABLIS at 6 months: ≤1% in 425/492 (86%), >1% to ≤10% in 54/492 (11%) and >10% in 13/492 (3%). Responses and outcomes according to transcript levels are presented in table 1. Patients with BCR-ABLIS >10% at 3 months achieved inferior CCgR and MMR rates at 1 year and inferior MR4.0 rate at 2 years, but the long-term outcome was comparable to patients with transcript levels < 10%. On the contrary, a BCR-ABLIS >1% at 3 months was associated, not only to lower subsequent response rates, but also to significantly inferior FFS, PFS and OS. The BCR-ABLIS levels able to predict for FFS, PFS and OS with maximal sensitivity and specificity (ROC curves) were 1.9%, 0.8% and 0.8%, respectively. Results were similar, with small differences, in the 6-month analysis. Conclusions. In a multicentric nationwide experience, the proportion of patients with BCR-ABLIS transcript levels >10% at 3 and 6 months was low. The risk distribution and the proportion of patients treated with high-dose IM may explain, at least in part, the differences with other published reports. At 3 and 6 months, a BCR-ABLIS cutoff of 1% was a reliable surrogate marker of response and outcome. A transcript level >10% identified a smaller cohort with inferior responses, but failed to predict the long-term outcome. A BCR-ABLIS level >1% at 3 and 6 months represents a warning, requiring a close monitoring. A switch to 2nd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be considered. Acknowledgments. University of Bologna, BolognaAIL, COFIN, Fondazione Carisbo. Disclosures: Castagnetti: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gugliotta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Abruzzese:Bristol Myers-Squibb and Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavazzini:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Soverini:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Martinelli:Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rosti:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau.

Frontline Treatment With Imatinib Mesylate in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Early Chronic Phase: a Very Long-Term Analysis by the GIMEMA CML Working Party

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 258-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Giorgina Specchia ◽  
Tamara Intermesoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background The chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapeutic scenario has been enriched by the approval of second generation TKIs as frontline treatment of early chronic phase (ECP) patients, but imatinib mesylate (IM) still represents the standard for many patients. The long term outcome is extremely important to assess the treatment efficacy and to decide on the allocation of resources. The phase 3 trials comparing second generation TKIs versus standard-dose IM have not still demonstrated a clear improvement in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival. In the IRIS trial, at 8 year, 55% of patients were still on IM and the overall survival (OS) was 85%. Other published reports have shorter follow-up. Aims and Methods To assess the very long-term outcome of CML patients treated frontline with IM, we analyzed 559 patients enrolled within 3 multicentric prospective studies conducted by the GIMEMA CML Working Party (NCT00514488, NCT00510926, observational trial CML023). Definitions: major molecular response (MMR), BCR-ABLIS ratio <0.1%; deep molecular response (MR4.0), detectable disease ≤ 0.01% BCR-ABLIS or undetectable disease with ≥10,000 ABL transcripts; progression, transformation to accelerated or blastic phase; failure, according to 2013 ELN criteria; event, treatment discontinuation for any reason or lost to follow-up. Information on survival and progression were regularly collected. All deaths, at any time and for any reason, were included. All the analysis have been made according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results Baseline demographics characteristics: median age: 52 years (extremes 18-84 years); male sex: 60%; high Sokal, high Euro and high EUTOS scores: 22%, 7% and 7%, respectively; clonal chromosomal abnormalities (CCA) in Ph+ cells: 4% (not evaluable in 32% of patients for insufficient number of metaphases); e13a2 BCR-ABL transcript: 36%. Median follow-up: 76 (7-99) months. The cumulative incidence of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), MMR and MR4 was 88%, 85% and 61%, respectively. The median time to CCyR, MMR and MR4 was 6, 7 and 42 months, respectively. Patients with high Sokal, high Euro and high EUTOS scores had significantly lower overall estimated probability of CCyR and MMR with respect to low and intermediate risk patients. A high Sokal score also predicted a significantly inferior probability of MR4; patients with high Euro and high EUTOS score had lower overall estimated probability of MR4, but the difference were not statistically significant. The reasons for IM discontinuation were: lack of efficacy (19%), toxicity or death (9%), withdrawal of informed consent (3%); 4% of patients were lost to follow-up. The 8-year event-free survival (EFS), failure-free survival (FFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were 55% (95% CI: 51-60%), 66% (95% CI: 61-70%), 84% (95% CI: 78-89%) and 85% (95% CI: 79-90%), respectively. A high Sokal and a high Euro scores were able to identify patients with significantly lower probability of EFS, FFS, PFS and OS with respect to the other patients. High EUTOS score patients had significantly poorer EFS and FFS, but PFS and OS differences were not significant. Age, performance status and e13a2 transcript resulted independent prognostic factors on PFS and OS. Conclusions Until now, the available data on the very long-term outcome of newly diagnosed chronic phase CML patients treated frontline with imatinib are limited to a company sponsored study (IRIS study). The GIMEMA CML Working Party provided an unbiased overview of the long-term imatinib therapeutic effects in a multicentric nationwide experience. These results should be taken into consideration to make treatment decision concerning the choice of the first line TKI, particularly in low risk patients. Acknowledgments University of Bologna, BolognaAIL, COFIN, Fondazione Carisbo. Disclosures: Castagnetti: Novartis Farma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gugliotta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Abruzzese:BMS, Novartis: Consultancy. Soverini:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Long-Term Outcome Following B-Cell Depletion Therapy with Rituximab In Children and Adults with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 72-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek L. Patel ◽  
Matthieu Mahévas ◽  
Roberto Stasi ◽  
Susanna Cunningham-Rundles ◽  
Bertrand Godeau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
One Year

Abstract Abstract 72 Background: Studies of B-cell depletion using Rituximab in adults with ITP report responses lasting at least one year in almost all of the 30–40% of patients with complete responses (CR: platelet count >150 × 109/l) and also a small fraction of patients with partial responses (PR: platelet count 50–150 × 109/l). However data describing patients with ITP who are relapse-free and off-treatment beyond 1–2 years from initial Rituximab are almost entirely anecdotal and comparable response data are even less available for children. This study assessed the duration of unmaintained platelet response following rituximab treatment in 72 adults and 66 children with ITP, all of whom had had at least an initial response to rituximab. Long-term outcome was estimated from these data. Methods: Seventeen published studies including 486 patients, 376 adults and 110 children, were used to obtain the initial response rates to standard-dose rituximab treatment (375mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks) in adults and children. Only 1 included study did not use the standard dose of rituximab. The Godeau study (Blood, 2008) was used to estimate the one-year response rate in adults with ITP. Only those adults whose responses persisted at least one year had follow up assessed whereas children who demonstrated even ephemeral responses were included. Only verified counts were used in this IRB-approved multicenter study. Results: 138 subjects with CR's or PR's after rituximab were included. All patients had starting platelet counts <30×109/l and 131 (95%) had ITP of > 6 months duration. Thirty-three (24%) had undergone splenectomy. Using the data from prior publications to obtain the initial response rates, children had a 56% initial response rate to rituximab treatment and adults had a 57% rate. Taking initial responders and then using the Godeau data for adults and Kaplan-Meier analysis of our data for children, 38% one-year response rates were obtained for both children and adults treated with rituximab. Both age groups also showed remarkable similarity at two years with 30% relapse-free response rates. However, all of the 26 eligible children maintained their response beyond two years whereas adults continued to relapse. Therefore the five-year response rate was 30% for children and only 21% for adults. Sex, duration of ITP, and age among adults did not affect long-term outcome. The rate of relapse was almost identical for splenectomized patients and non-splenectomized ones but the splenectomized patients appeared to relapse sooner (Figure). Patients with CR's (55 of the 72 adults with responses lasting at least one year were CR's) had better long-term outcomes than did patients with PR's even more than one year from initial treatment. B-cells returned significantly sooner to higher levels in subjects who relapsed compared to those whose responses were ongoing. No clinical long-term toxicity was observed but 2 patients were identified to have mild hypogammaglobulinemia > 30 months from initial treatment. Conclusions: In summary, only approximately 1 in 5 adults treated with rituximab will have an at least five-year relapse-free response rate which is disappointingly low; children have only a slightly higher five-year relapse-free response rate. A pilot study to improve outcomes using either R-CVP or double dose rituximab was unsuccessful (Hasan, Am J Hematol,2009) Current efforts to improve long-term response rates have focused on the combination of high dose dexamethasone and rituximab (or even by providing maintenance treatment with rituximab). A better understanding of the mechanism of effect of rituximab in patients with ITP might allow an improved treatment strategy to be developed. Fortunately, the toxicity of rituximab treatment in patients with uncomplicated ITP appears to be low; however, yearly testing for immunoglobulins for a minimum of five years might be appropriate. Disclosures: Neufeld: Novartis. Inc: Research Funding. Shenoy:Novartis Oncology: Honoraria. Bussel:Amgen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sysmex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy.

Kinetics of Molecular Response with Different Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) Used As Frontline Therapy in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-Chronic Phase (CML CP),

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3784-3784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran Naqvi ◽  
Hagop M Kantarjian ◽  
Rajyalakshmi Luthra ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Transcript Level ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Frontline Therapy

Abstract Abstract 3784 Background: TKI are standard therapy for patients with CML CP. Imatinib was first established as frontline therapy and more recently dasatinib and nilotinib have shown improved rates and speed of response. Early molecular response has been associated with improved long-term outcome (Blood 2009; 113: 6315), thus the kinetics and rates of molecular response are important predictors of long-term outcome. Aim: To determine the kinetics and rates of molecular response with different TKIs used as initial therapy for patients with CML CP. Methods: We evaluated all pts treated with frontline TKIs (imatinib standard dose or high dose, dasatinib and nilotinib) in consecutive or parallel trials. Cytogenetic and molecular responses were assessed at least every 3 months for the first 12 months, then every 6 months, and were defined using the recommendations of European LeukemiaNet. Molecular responses were defined using international scale. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of the 485 pts treated, 73 received imatinib 400mg; 208 imatinib 800mg; 99 dasatinib, and 105 nilotinib. Median age was 48 years (15–86) and median time from diagnosis to TKI therapy was 1 mo (1–13). The median follow-up for each group were 109 months (mo) with imatinib 400, 69 mo with imatinib 800, 30 with dasatinib and 25 mo with nilotinib. Nineteen pts with clonal evolution, but otherwise in CP, were included. Sokal risk score was high in 7%, intermediate in 24% and low in 69%. Cumulative rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) were: imatinib 400mg 87%; imatinib 800mg 91%; dasatinib 96%; and nilotinib 94%. The rate of MMR with imatinib 400mg was 73%, with imatinib 800mg 87%, dasatinib 86%, and nilotinib 88%. Rates of CMR (BCR-ABL/ABL ≤0.0032% IS) were 51%, 71%, 61% and 62%. Median time to achieve MMR and CMR were: imatinib 400mg, 12 mo (3–60) and 18 mo (3–60); imatinib 800mg, 6 mo (3–60) and 9 mo (3–60); dasatinib, 6 mo (3–36) and 12 mo (3–54), and nilotinib 6 mo (3–48) and 6 mo (3–42). The median transcript levels at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 mo by treatment arm are shown in table 1. The rates of MMR and CMR at 36 mo for imatinib 400mg were 58% and 34%. Corresponding rates for imatinib 800mg were 87% and 59%; for dasatinib 87% and 54%; and for nilotinib 90% and 63%. We then assessed the probability of achieving MMR and CMR at 12 mo according to the BCR-ABL/ABL levels at earlier timepoints. Two of 9 (22%) evaluable pts with transcript level >10 at 3 mo achieved a MMR at 12 mo but none achieved a CMR. In contrast, 31/52 (60%) evaluable pts with transcript level >1–10 at 3 mo, achieved a MMR at 12 mo and 4 (8%) achieved a CMR. Similarly, pts with level >0.1–1 at 3 mo, 72/129 (56%) evaluable pts achieved a MMR and 29 pts (22%) a CMR at 12 months. For each individual TKI, a similar trend was noted where a higher transcript level (>10; >1–10; >0.1–1) at 3 mo was associated with a decline in achieving a MMR and CMR at 12 mo (MMR- imatinib 400mg: 0%; 50%; 67%, imatinib 800mg: 0%; 62%; 80%, dasatinib: 33%; 67%; 71%, nilotinib: 100%; 50%, 88%, CMR-imatinib 400mg: 0%, imatinib 800mg: 0%; 8%; 10%, dasatinib:0%; 17%; 29%, nilotinib: 0%; 0%; 32%). The probability of transformation to AP/BP by transcript levels at 3 mo (>10; >1–10; >0.1–1, ≤0.1) was 0%, 3%, 2% and 1% for the overall population, with similar trends for the different therapies. Conclusion: New TKI provide a faster improvement in molecular response among pts with CML CP receiving TKI as initial therapy. Early responses are equally predictive of long-term outcome across all treatment options. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Ravandi:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Cortes:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; ChemGenex: ChemGenex is now Cephalon, Inc., Consultancy, Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding.

Real World Efficacy Evaluation of Branded and Copy Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Multicentric Study from Argentina

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 36-37
Author(s):  
Ana Ines Varela ◽  
Georgina Bendek ◽  
Carolina Pavlovsky ◽  
Maria Josefina Freitas ◽  
Veronica Ventriglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Sokal Score

Background: Data on the safety and efficacy of copy drugs is usually unavailable. Imatinib mesylate is used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in Argentina since 2002. During the last decade more than ten different imatinib copies are marketed by the different health-care systems in the country, usually for cost issues. In spite of the undoubted benefit of this tyrosine-kinase inhibitor indication in CML, there is no solid evidence that supports copy drug equivalent outcomes for this patient population. Aim: To compare the clinical presentation, treatment response and outcome of a chronic phase (CP) CML patient cohort treated with branded and copy imatinib in the real-life setting. Methods: Multicentric, retrospective trial based on data obtained from medical charts of adult CP CML patients treated with imatinib in 9 centers in Argentina from 2002 to 2020.We analyzed demographic characteristics and clinical characteristics described for branded and copy imatinib treated cohorts. Frequency of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 12 months, Major molecular response or better(≥MMR) at 12, 18 and 24 months and overall MR4.0, MR4.5 and deep molecular response (MR4.0 +MR4.5 IS) were analyzed. Event was defined as failure, progression or CML related death. Kaplan Meier comparison of event free, progression free and overall survival. Statistics: IBM SPSS version 1. Results: A total of 568 CP CML adult patients (pt) treated with imatinib were included. Mean age at diagnosis: 45.7 years (range 18 - 85). Male 55.6% (316/568). Sokal Score was recorded in 471 pt: 57% (269/471) low, 26% (122/471) intermediate and 17% (80/471) high-risk. Median follow-up 107 months (RIQ: 36-149). Branded imatinib treatment 330 (58%) and imatinib copies 238 (42%). For branded and copy imatinib cohorts mean age 46,1 (18-85) and 45.3(18-80), male 53% (175/330) and 59% (141/238), median follow up 102 (RIQ 101-130) and 61 (RIQ 62-146) respectively. Sokal score low 58% (164/284) and 56% (105/187), intermediate 27% (77/284) and 24% (45/187) and high 15% (43/284) and19% (37/187). Frequency of CCyR at 12 months 71% (67/94) and 69% (41/59), ≥MMR at 12 months 57% (79/138) and 43% (39/89), ≥MMR 18m 66 % (61/92) and 71% (43/60), ≥MMR 24m 65% (96/147) and 79% (58/73). Overall MR4, MR 4.5 and Deep MR with branded imatinib 62.4% (186/298), 42% (118/276) and 63% (189/300), compared to 45(97/214), 24% (50/207) and 46% (99/215) with copies. Difference in evaluation throughout the treatment periods with loss of data did not allow response rate statistical comparison in predetermined timepoints. Kaplan Meier Event free survival median 229 months vs 75 months p 0.001, Progression free survival mean 318 months vs 208 pt 0.034 and Overall Survival mean 275 months vs 206 months for branded and copy imatinib respectively. Discussion: Several case reports have shown poor outcomes in patients treated with imatinib copy drugs, including loss of responses previously attained with branded imatinib. This study reports data from a large cohort of CP CML patients treated in daily practice during a long period of time. Treatment results at determined timepoints is comparable. Although management and treatment decisions were performed in different time periods, results show different outcomes in EFS and PFS between patients treated with branded vs copy imatinib. Overall survival in both cohorts is comparable. As studies assesing the safety and efficacy of the copy drugs compared with branded imatinib will hardly be performed this evidence calls for careful attention and strict follow up measures when managing CML patients with copy imatinib. Figure Disclosures Varela: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Pavlovsky:Pint Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Freitas:Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board. Pavlovsky:Varifarma: Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants, Speakers Bureau. Moiraghi:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau.

Disease Patterns for Patients (pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) That Have BCR-ABL Transcript Levels > 10% At 3 Month of Therapy with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3757-3757
Author(s):  
Aziz Nazha ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Preetesh Jain ◽  
Elias J. Jabbour ◽  
Alfonso Quintás-Cardama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Transcript Level ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 3757 Background: Response to TKIs in CML at 3 month is a strong predictor for long term outcome in CML patients treated with TKIs. Pts who do not achieve a BCR-ABL transcript level < 10% or a MCyR at 3 months have lower event-free survival (EFS) and perhaps overall survival (OS). However, pts have rarely changed therapy based on response at this early time points. The purpose of this analysis is to understand the patterns of disease progression and management in this group of patients. Patients and Methods: A total of 489 newly diagnosed CML pts that received initial treatment with TKIs: imatinib 400 mg daily (83) imatinib 800 mg daily (199), and second generation TKIs (2GTKIs) (207) in consecutive or parallel trials between 7/2000 and 6/2011 were included in this analysis. Cytogentic and molecular responses were evaluated every 3 month for the first year and then every 6 month. Event was defined as transformation to accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP), loss of complete hematologic response (CHR), or loss of MCyR. Results: Among the 489 treated pts, 58 (12%) did not achieve a MCyR or BCR-ABL transcript level < 10 % at 3 months (26 pts (31%) received IM400, 19 (10%) IM800, and 13 (6%) 2GTKIs. Eleven of these pts (19%) had high sokal score at diagnosis (1 pt treated with imatinib 400, 7 with imatinib 800, 3 with 2GTKIs). By 6 months, 52/58 pts (90%) continued on their original therapy: 39 (67%) at the same dose and 19 (33%) with a decreased dose because of adverse events. No pt had a dose increase. Six pts had discontinued therapy by 6 month: 4 due to intolerance, 1 loss of CHR and 1 for progression to BP. At 6 month, 27 pts (47%) achieved MCyR or BCR-ABL transcript level < 10 %. At 12 months, 47 pts (81%) were still receiving their initial therapy, 11 pts (19%) had discontinued their initial TKI: 6 due to intolerance, 1 loss of CHR, 2 for progression to BP, and 2 for resistant disease. After a median follow up of 95 months, 17 pts (29%) continue to receive their initial therapy and their current disease status are: complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) in 14 (82%), 2 (12%) lost their CCyR, and 1(6%) pt who never achieve any cytogenetic or molecular response and remains in chronic phase on the same dose of imatinib for over 8 years. Among these 17 pts, 11 (65%) have MMR, 2 (12%) with MR4.5, and 4 (24%) have lost MMR (2 of them with loss of CCyR). The 5 years OS, EFS and transformation-free survival (TFS) for the patients who did not achieve any response at 3 month was 88%, 77%, and 94%, respectively. The OS, EFS, and TFS for the patients who subsequently achieved a response (MCyR or BCR-ABL transcript level < 10 %) at 6 month was 100%, 66%, and 95%, respectively vs those who continued to have no response 79%, 95%, and 100%, respectively (P = 0.17, 0.07, 0.99, respectively). Conclusions: Although BCR-ABL transcript level at 3 month may predict long-term outcome of pts with CML treated with TKIs, this represents a static, one-time measure. Assessing the response at 6 months of pts with poor response at 3 months may provide a better predictor of long term outcome. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Cytogenetic and Molecular Responses At 3 Months Are Associated with A Better Outcome in Early Chronic Phase (ECP) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients Treated with Nilotinib.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2797-2797
Author(s):  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Francesca Palandri ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Luciano Levato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Transcript Level ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Blastic Phase

Abstract Abstract 2797 Background: Nilotinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor that demonstrated higher and faster responses and lower progression rates compared to imatinib in ECP CML patients. Early cytogenetic and molecular responses have been associated with a better outcome in patients treated with imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib frontline. In particular, BCR-ABL transcript level < 10% at 3 months has been associated with: increased 2-year cumulative incidence of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR), and MR4.5 (>4.5 log reduction in BCR-ABL transcript level) with dasatinib (Marin D et al, Blood 2012); increased CCyR rate by 1 year, MMR rate by 2 years, and better progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years, with dasatinib (DASISION; Hochhaus A et al, ASH 2011, abs. 2767); increased MMR rate by 1 year, and better PFS and overall survival (OS), with nilotinib (ENESTnd; Hochhaus A et al, EHA 2012, abs. 584). Here we report a landmark analyses based on BCR-ABL transcript level and cytogenetic response at 3 months to evaluate their impact on subsequent response and outcome in an independent cohort of patients treated with nilotinib-based regimens in Italy (CML Italian Registry of Nilotinib). Methods: The CML Italian Registry of Nilotinib includes 215 patients, enrolled in 2 multicenter phase II studies conducted by the GIMEMA CML WP (ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT00481052 and NCT00769327) or treated at the Dpt. of Hematology and Oncology, Bologna University Hospital, with nilotinib 300 mg BID or 400 mg BID as initial treatment. The median age was 53 years (range 18–86). The median follow-up was 29 months (range: 18–47 months). At 3 months 196/215 (91%) and 189/215 (88%) patients were evaluable for the molecular and cytogenetic response, respectively. BCR-ABL transcript levels were: 21% in 88%; > 1% to 2 10% in 11%; > 10% in 1%; given the very low proportion of patients with a BCR-ABL > 10% (n. 2), to the purpose of these analyses, patients have been divided into 2 groups, with a transcript level 21% (n. 173, 88%), or > 1% (n. 23, 12%). Cytogenetic response was: CCyR 84%; partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) 9%; less than PCyR 7%. We analyzed the rate of MMR at 1 year, and the failure-free survival (FFS, according to ELN 2009 definitions), PFS (transformation to accelerated or blastic phase), and OS (any death included) according to the BCR-ABL transcript levels and to the cytogenetic response at 3 months. Results: Of the 2 patients with a BCR-ABL transcript level > 10% at 3 months, 1 progressed to blastic phase at 1 year, while the other one obtained a CCyR at 6 months and a MMR at 24 months. Patients with BCR-ABL 2 1% at 3 months had a higher rate of MMR at 12 months with respect to those with a transcript level > 1% (79% vs. 35%, p<0.001) (Table 1). A lower transcript level (BCR-ABL 2 1%) at 3 months correlated with a better FFS and PFS and a similar OS at 3 years. Patients with a MCgR and CCyR at 3 months had higher rates of MMR at 12 months (77% and 79%, respectively) vs. patients with less than a MCyR or less than a CCyR (46% and 57%, respectively) (p=0.02 and 0.019, respectively). Patients in MCgR at 3 months had a better FFS and PFS, but similar OS with respect to patients not in MCgR. Conclusion: In our national experience, where 42 centers are represented with at least 1 patient, a very small proportion of patients treated frontline with nilotinib failed to achieve a reduction to < 10% level of BCR-ABL transcript (2/196 or 1%) if compared to other reports: in the frame of the ENESTnd trial, 24/258 or 9% (Hochhaus et al, EHA 2012, abs. 584). The cut-off of 1% of BCR-ABL at 3 months in our experience is a reliable surrogate marker of response at 1 year (MMR) and outcome (PFS and FFS), along with the level of cytogenetic response achieved. These patients with > 1% of BCR-ABL at 3 months are characterized by a higher propensity to fail the treatment and to progress. Consequently, they deserve a close monitoring and, for those not achieving the expected cytogenetic and molecular responses later on (at 6–12 months), an optimization of the dose of nilotinib or a treatment modification is advised. Acknowledgments: European LeukemiaNet, University of Bologna, BolognAIL, COFIN. Disclosures: Gugliotta: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Castagnetti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Abruzzese:Bristol Myers-Squibb and Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Soverini:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rosti:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau.

Long-Term Outcome of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Patients Treated with Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1696-1696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Katrina Zell ◽  
John Barnard ◽  
Amy E. DeZern ◽  
David P. Steensma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Medical Need

Abstract Background: The majority of MDS patients (pts) have anemia and are treated initially with ESAs. Particularly for lower-risk MDS pts (International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Low and Int-1), once ESAs are no longer effective, treatment options are limited to drugs commonly used for higher-risk MDS, such as hypomethylating agents, or off-label use of immunomodulatory drugs. As a result, most pts receive only transfusion support post-ESA, representing a pt group with an unmet medical need frequently targeted for drug development, for whom long-term outcome is unknown. Methods: We studied pts diagnosed with lower-risk MDS from 1997-2014 at MDS CRC institutions and treated with ESAs (epoetin alpha (epo) or darbepoetin (darb)). The best response to treatment was categorized per International Working Group 2006 response criteria (hematological improvement (HI), complete response (CR), or partial response (PR)). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at the time of ESA failure, defined as cessation of treatment due to relapse or refractoriness; a secondary endpoint was time to AML transformation or death, from time of response (for responders) or failure (for nonresponders) determination. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics. The Kaplan Meier method was used to estimate OS and a log rank analysis was used to compare response categories. Cox regression analysis was performed for multivariable analysis. Results: Of 206 patients included in analyses, median age was 71.6 years (range: 25.3-88.1), 36% were female, 5% were African-American, and 11% had t-MDS. WHO categories included RA (14%), RARS (16%), RCMD (42%), MDS-u (6%), del (5q) (4%), RAEB-1 (9%), RAEB-2 (2%), RARS-T (2%), MDS/MPN-u (3%), and CMML-1 (2%), with pts classified as IPSS Low (39%), Int-1 (61%), or IPSS-R Very Low (16%), Low (55%), Intermediate (26%), and High (4%). IPSS cytogenetic risk groups were Good (72%), Intermediate (22%), and Poor (6%). Baseline median hemoglobin was 9.4 g/dl (range: 5.5-14.2), serum epo level was 97.2 (range: 14.2-3899.0), and 11% were transfusion-dependent. Treatment included darb (59%) and epo (41%) at median doses of 300 mcg (range: 100-500) and 40,000 units (range: 5,000-80,000), respectively. Pts remained on therapy for a median of 30.4 weeks (range: 0.0-447.7) and had a median follow-up of 28.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 24.5, 45.4). First treatments following ESA failure included azacitidine (41.7%), decitabine (10.2%), lenalidomide (16.6%), experimental drugs (3.1%), other growth factors (13.6%), ATG and/or other immunosuppressants (8%), chemotherapy (0.1%) , transplant (0.1%) and others (6.6%). The overall response rate (ORR) to ESAs was 18.8%, with 0% achieving CR; 0.1% PR; and 18.7% HI. Responses for epo were 17.3% and for darb were 19.8% (p=.67 for difference). For both ESAs, 81.2% of patients had disease refractory to treatment: 69.4% with stable disease and 12% with progressive disease with no significant differences between epo and darb by responder status. Median response duration for epo and darb were 21.9 weeks (range: 3.0 - 447.7) and 39.1 weeks (range: 0.0 - 350.7) respectively (p=0.045). Median survival from the date of diagnosis was 28.4 months (95% CI: 24.5, 45.4), and from ESA failure was 23.9 months (95% CI: 19.9, 33.0): 21.6 months (95% CI: 15.6, 39.2) for epo and 28.8 months (95% CI: 21.2, 39.7) for darb (p=0.99) (Figure). Median time to AML transformation or death was 17.4 Months (95% CI: 14.1, 22.9): 25.4 months for responders and 16.8 months for non-responders (p=.069). For patients who received ESAs for a minimum of 4 months (39% of pts for epo and 61% for darb), ORR was 16.5%, and median survival from ESA failure was 23.0 months (95% CI: 14.7, 33.0): 22.3 months (95% CI: 13.1, NA) for epo and 24.7 months (95% CI: 14.3, 39.7) for darb (p=0.87). Conclusion: In this large, but uncontrolled cohort, response rates were similar for lower-risk MDS patients treated with epo and darb, though duration was longer for darb. There was a trend for improved outcomes in patients who responded to ESAs. Lower-risk MDS patients treated with ESAs have an OS of less than 2 years from the time of failure, and can thus be considered a high-risk MDS group for whom subsequent therapies are not standardized, representing an unmet medical need. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Sekeres: Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Steensma:Incyte: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy. Komrokji:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcome of Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Nilotinib Front-Line

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Franck E Nicolini ◽  
Vincent Alcazer ◽  
Pascale Cony-Makhoul ◽  
Stephanie Dulucq ◽  
Sandrine Hayette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Nilotinib (NIL) 600 mg daily has demonstrated its superiority over Imatinib 400 mg daily in terms of response and incidence of deep molecular response in the front-line chronic phase (CP) CML setting. In this observational study we have retrospectively analyzed the outcome of in- and out-study 202 patients (pts) treated in this setting with NIL 600 mg front-line, in "real-life" conditions. All pts with newly diagnosed adult CP-CML receiving NIL 300 mg BID alone front-line between 10/2007 and 06/2020, were eligible for this study. Data were retrospectively collected according to the current French regulations with pts' information. All pts were assessed and followed according to ELN recommendations 2003, 2006, and 2009 along treatment and to the recommendations from the French group of CML (D. Rea et al., Cancer 2018) in case of TFR. In this regard, a TKI was resumed if loss of MMR. All BCR-ABL1 assessments were performed in the 3 reference laboratories, standardised and expressed in % (IS) with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. The primary endpoints were the rate of molecular responses in the long-term and the (vascular) safety of Nilotinib. Secondary endpoints were the kinetics of molecular response, survival and safety of Nilotinib. Survival (OS, PFS & EFS) was defined according to ELN (J. Guilhot et al. Blood 2012). Two hundred and two patients were reported with 44% females and 56% males with a median age at diagnosis of 50.4 (17.5-83) years, and 26% of them had cardiovascular risk factors at onset (tobacco abuse 11%, hypercholesterolemia 9.3%, diabetes 1.45%, none with past history of cardiovascular events [CVE]). ELTS scores were high in 14%, intermediate in 31% and low in 55% of pts. Twenty-four (12%) pts harboured additional chromosomal abnormalities at diagnosis. The median follow-up after NIL initiation was 61.5 (1-147.5) months. At last follow-up 113 pts (55%) are not on NIL anymore for toxicities, TFR or resistance reasons. Twenty-eight (14%) pts present an arterial event on NIL (18% PAOD, 14% angina pectoralis, 7% myocardial infarction, 14% stroke, 47% others such as atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy...), that occurred after a median of 26 (0.6-98.5) months on NIL. Forty-six (22.5%) pts reached TFR criteria and stopped NIL after a median of 58.5 (27-126) months. The cumulative incidence (CI) rates of MMR at 1, 2 and 5 years were 64 (57-71)%, 79.4 (75.45-83.35)% and 95 (92-98.5)% respectively. For MR4, those were 35.5 (29-42)%, 60 (52-67)% and 82 (74.5-89)% respectively; and for MR4.5, were 14 (9-19)%, 31 (24-28)% and 62 (54-70.5)% respectively. The CI of sustained MR4.5 (i. e. patients eligible for TFR: MR4.5 ≥2 years) was observed in 30 (23-37)% at 3 years, 45.5 (36-55)% at 5 years and 52.5 (41.5-64)% at 6 years (Figure). The CI of patients entering TFR was 16.75 (10.5-23)% at 5 years and 51.94 (37.31-66.57)% at 10 years with a survival without MMR loss of 70.7 (58- 86)% at 1 year and 65.26 (50.6-84)% at 5 years. Nine (4.5%) pts progressed towards accelerated phase (4 pts) or BC (2 lymphoid, 3 myeloid) responsible for 5 deaths at latest follow-up. Among NIL resistant patients screened, 15 were harbouring ABL1 mutations (5 Y253H, 3 E255K, 3 T315I, 1 M244V, 1 G250E, 1 F359V, 1 V299L). Overall, 10 patients died (5 from CML, 5 from unrelated causes). The probability of OS was 95.75 [95%CI: 92.9-98.7]% at 2 years and 94.8 [91.5-98.3]% at 5 years, for PFS it was 94.92 [91.7-98.2]% at 2 years and 89.5 [84.7-94.6]% at 5 years, and EFS it was 78 [72.3-84]% at 2 years and 60.25 [53.3-68.1]% at 5 years. Regarding sustained MR4.5, univariate analysis showed that female gender (HR=2.46 [1.50-4.02], p&lt;0.001) and low ELTS (HR=0.41 [0.22-0.76], p&lt;0.004) had a significant impact, while multivariate analysis confirmed the role of these 2 factors (HR=2.31 [1.41- 3.79], p=0.001 and HR= 0.52 [0.30- 0.90], p=0.02) in addition to high ELTS (HR= 0.28 [0.14- 0.58], p&lt;0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that only age impacted on the CI of CVE (HR= 1.07 [1.04-1.10], p&lt;0.001, and HR=1.07 [1.04-1.10], p&lt;0.001). NIL first-line efficiently limits progression of newly diagnosed CP-CML patients and provides high rates of sustained MR4.5, allowing TFR in a substantial proportion of pts. However, the onset of arterial occlusive events, especially in the elderly is a matter of concern in the choice of this compound at treatment initiation. Disclosures Nicolini: Incyte: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma Ltd: Consultancy. Cony-Makhoul:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Dulucq:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Cayuela:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mahon:ARIAD: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Etienne:Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Incidence, Risk Factors, Treatment and Long Term Outcome of Refractory and First Relapse AML Patients in the OSHO Studies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1358-1358
Author(s):  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
Rainer Krahl ◽  
Christoph Kahl ◽  
Hans-Heinrich Wolf ◽  
Sebastian Scholl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Advisory Boards

Introduction: Outcome of patients (pts) with refractory AML or following relapse is considered dismal and usually reported as refractory/relapsed. Here we analyzed long term outcome of refractory and relapsing pts separately over a 10 year (y) period from two prospective, non-age-limited, adult AML studies. Results have been published or presented previously as part of the German AML Intergroup studies1,2. However, incidence, characteristics, treatment and outcome of refractory and relapsed pts have not been evaluated. Patients and Methods: A total of 1621 pts from the OSHO 2002 ≤60 y (n=740) and 2004 &gt;60 y (n=881) with newly diagnosed AML (except acute promyelocytic leukemia) and eligible for chemotherapy were analyzed. The gender was male in 51.7% of pts. AML type was de novo in 66.6%, followed by secondary AML in 25.8% and therapy related in 7.6%. Cytogenetic risk status was normal in 47.9%, intermediate in 16.3%, unfavorable in 15.3%, monosomal in 12.6% and favorable in 7.9%. Molecular analysis revealed wildtype (wt) FLT3 in 80.9% and FLT3 ITD mutated (mut) in 19.1% of pts. NPM was mutated in 30.2% of 1124 pts. In the AML 2002 and 2004 studies (NCT 01414231; NCT 01497002; NCT00266136), pts were randomly (9:1) assigned to remission induction by cytarabine (1 g/m2 bid d 1, 3, 5, 7) and Idarubicin (AML 2002) 12 mg/m2/d d 1-31 or mitoxantrone (AML 2004) 10 mg/m2/d iv d 1 - 32 or to a common arm consisting of a 3+7 scheme 3. Pts in complete remission (CR) received consolidation and stem cell transplantation (HSCT) according to cytogenetic risk and donor availability1,2. Pts with partial remission (PR) or non-response (NR) to two induction cycles were considered refractory. Pts achieving CR and relapsing thereafter were considered relapses and treated with MitoFlag or Flag-Ida4. Results: The majority of pts [median age 62 (range 17-87) y] entered CR or CRi after one or two induction cycles (n=1144; 70.6%). OS was 31.9 (29.5-34.4) % @5y and 26.0 (23.4-28.9) % @10y. Results were age dependent and superior in younger pts with an OS of 46.8 (43.1-50.7) % @5y compared to 19.3 (16.7-22.4) % @ 5y in elderly. Age, cytogenetics and NPM1 were determinants for CR and WBC (p&lt;0,001), gender (p&lt;0,05) and AML type (p&lt;0,01) for OS. FLT3-ITD mut was an important determinant for relapse free survival in pts ≤60y. A total of 238 (14.7%) of 1621 pts, 23.5% in the younger and 76.5% in the elderly study, were refractory (PR 60.1%, NR 39.9%). Pts had a median age of 66 (range 23-83)y. OS of refractory pts was 11.4 (7.9-16.6)% @5y, and dependent upon PR [(13.1 (8.1-21.1) % @10y] and NR [5.2 (2.1-12.6) % @5y; p=0.0003]. Intensive chemotherapy ± HSCT and hypomethylating agents (HMA) were able to induce CR in 24.8% of pts. CR and non-CR pts had an OS of 42.7 (31.4-58.2) % @5y and an OS of 3.7 (1.7-8.0) % @2y, respectively. Risk factors for OS in refractory pts were age and type of therapy (p&lt;0.0001). Almost all long term survivors were treated with HSCT. Of the 1144 CR/CRi pts, 582 relapsed 1-121 months (mts) after CR. Relapse occurred in 34.0% ≤6 mts, in 38,8% between 7-18 mts and in 12,2% &gt;18 mts. Age, cytogenetic risk, type of AML, interval CR to relapse and HSCT were the dominant factors for relapse. CR2 was achieved after intensive chemotherapy ± HSCT, ± DLI and HMA in 227 pts (39.0%), 54.5% in the AML 2002 and 28.4% in the AML 2004. OS of relapsed pts was 13.8 (11.1 - 17.3) % @5y and 10.9 (7.4 - 16.2) % @10y and was higher in the younger with 23.4 (18.2-29.9) % @5y as compared to elderly pts 6.9 (4.4 - 11.0) % @5y. Pts with CR2 had a LFS of 24.9 (19.5-31.7) % @5y and was highest in patients &lt;60y when intensive chemotherapy followed by HSCT was involved. Independent risk factors for OS in relapsed pts were age, cytogenetic risk, interval CR1 to relapse and type of therapy. Relapsed pts with HSCT in CR1 showed a trend for reduced survival. Conclusions Outcome of pts with refractory and relapsed AML is unsatisfactory but consistent &gt;10% @5y. A differential response is observed in refractory and relapsed pts and is dependent upon PR, NR and the achievement of CR. Increase of CR rate in younger but especially in elderly pts with second generation TKI, reduction of TRM using FLT3-inhibitor monotherapy and the option to treat pts ineligible to chemotherapy promise better outcome in refractory and relapsed AML. 1Büchner et al. JCO 2012; 2Niederwieser et al Blood 2016; 3Mayer et al. NEJM 1994; 4Thiel et al. Ann Oncology 2015 Disclosures Niederwieser: Daichii: Speakers Bureau; Cellectis: Consultancy. Scholl:Gilead: Other: Project funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Advisory boards; AbbVie: Other: Advisory boards; Pfizer: Other: Advisory boards; Novartis: Other: Project funding. Zojer:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sayer:Novartis: Other: none. Schwind:Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Maschmeyer:Gilead, Janssen Cilag, Astra Zeneca; BMS, Merk-Serono: Honoraria. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding. Al-Ali:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CTI: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document