Frontline Treatment With Imatinib Mesylate in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Early Chronic Phase: a Very Long-Term Analysis by the GIMEMA CML Working Party

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 258-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Giorgina Specchia ◽  
Tamara Intermesoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background The chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapeutic scenario has been enriched by the approval of second generation TKIs as frontline treatment of early chronic phase (ECP) patients, but imatinib mesylate (IM) still represents the standard for many patients. The long term outcome is extremely important to assess the treatment efficacy and to decide on the allocation of resources. The phase 3 trials comparing second generation TKIs versus standard-dose IM have not still demonstrated a clear improvement in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival. In the IRIS trial, at 8 year, 55% of patients were still on IM and the overall survival (OS) was 85%. Other published reports have shorter follow-up. Aims and Methods To assess the very long-term outcome of CML patients treated frontline with IM, we analyzed 559 patients enrolled within 3 multicentric prospective studies conducted by the GIMEMA CML Working Party (NCT00514488, NCT00510926, observational trial CML023). Definitions: major molecular response (MMR), BCR-ABLIS ratio <0.1%; deep molecular response (MR4.0), detectable disease ≤ 0.01% BCR-ABLIS or undetectable disease with ≥10,000 ABL transcripts; progression, transformation to accelerated or blastic phase; failure, according to 2013 ELN criteria; event, treatment discontinuation for any reason or lost to follow-up. Information on survival and progression were regularly collected. All deaths, at any time and for any reason, were included. All the analysis have been made according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results Baseline demographics characteristics: median age: 52 years (extremes 18-84 years); male sex: 60%; high Sokal, high Euro and high EUTOS scores: 22%, 7% and 7%, respectively; clonal chromosomal abnormalities (CCA) in Ph+ cells: 4% (not evaluable in 32% of patients for insufficient number of metaphases); e13a2 BCR-ABL transcript: 36%. Median follow-up: 76 (7-99) months. The cumulative incidence of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), MMR and MR4 was 88%, 85% and 61%, respectively. The median time to CCyR, MMR and MR4 was 6, 7 and 42 months, respectively. Patients with high Sokal, high Euro and high EUTOS scores had significantly lower overall estimated probability of CCyR and MMR with respect to low and intermediate risk patients. A high Sokal score also predicted a significantly inferior probability of MR4; patients with high Euro and high EUTOS score had lower overall estimated probability of MR4, but the difference were not statistically significant. The reasons for IM discontinuation were: lack of efficacy (19%), toxicity or death (9%), withdrawal of informed consent (3%); 4% of patients were lost to follow-up. The 8-year event-free survival (EFS), failure-free survival (FFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were 55% (95% CI: 51-60%), 66% (95% CI: 61-70%), 84% (95% CI: 78-89%) and 85% (95% CI: 79-90%), respectively. A high Sokal and a high Euro scores were able to identify patients with significantly lower probability of EFS, FFS, PFS and OS with respect to the other patients. High EUTOS score patients had significantly poorer EFS and FFS, but PFS and OS differences were not significant. Age, performance status and e13a2 transcript resulted independent prognostic factors on PFS and OS. Conclusions Until now, the available data on the very long-term outcome of newly diagnosed chronic phase CML patients treated frontline with imatinib are limited to a company sponsored study (IRIS study). The GIMEMA CML Working Party provided an unbiased overview of the long-term imatinib therapeutic effects in a multicentric nationwide experience. These results should be taken into consideration to make treatment decision concerning the choice of the first line TKI, particularly in low risk patients. Acknowledgments University of Bologna, BolognaAIL, COFIN, Fondazione Carisbo. Disclosures: Castagnetti: Novartis Farma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gugliotta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Abruzzese:BMS, Novartis: Consultancy. Soverini:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

The BCR-ABL Transcript Levels At 3 and 6 Months Predict the Long-Term Outcome of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated Frontline with Imatinib Mesylate: A Gimema CML WP Analysis

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1678-1678
Author(s):  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Giorgina Specchia ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Transcript Levels

Abstract Abstract 1678 Background. Imatinib mesylate (IM) is the therapeutic standard for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but nilotinib and dasatinib, at least in selected patients, have the potential to replace it. The early prediction of poor outcome is important to optimize the treatment strategy. In IM-treated patients, BCR-ABL transcript levels according to the International Scale (IS) > 10% at 3 and > 1% at 6 months were able to identify high-risk groups (Marin et al, JClinOncol 2011; Hanfstein et al, Leukemia 2012). Similar analysis were performed within the IM arms of the ENESTnd trial (Hochhaus et al, EHA 2012) and the DASISION trial (Jabbour et al, EHA 2012). Methods. To investigate the prognostic impact of BCR-ABLIS levels at 3 and 6 months on the future response status and the long-term outcome of CML patients treated frontline with IM, we analyzed 559 patients enrolled within 3 trials of the GIMEMA CML WP (ClinTrialsGov NCT00514488/NCT00510926, observational trial CML023). Patients with evaluable QPCR sample at 3 and 6 months: 487/559 (87%) and 492/559 (88%), respectively. Definitions: major molecular response (MMR): BCR-ABLIS ratio <0.1%; molecular response with 4.0-log reduction (MR4.0): BCR-ABLIS <0.01%; failures: according to 2009 ELN recommendations. The rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) and MMR at 1 year, the rate of MR4.0 at 2 years, the failure-free survival (FFS), the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) according to the BCR-ABL transcript levels (≤10% vs >10 and ≤1% vs >1%) at 3 and 6 months were analyzed. Patients with events or censored within 3 or 6 months were excluded from the respective analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used for descriptive purposes. Results. Median age: 52 years (range 18–84). IM dose: 76% 400mg, 24% 800mg. Sokal score: 39% low, 39% intermediate, 22% high; EUTOS score: 93% low, 7% high. Median follow-up: 76 months (range: 7–99); 95% of patients had at least 5-year observation. BCR-ABLIS at 3 months: ≤1% in 336/487 (69%), >1% to ≤10% in 120/487 (25%) and >10% in 31/487 (6%). BCR-ABLIS at 6 months: ≤1% in 425/492 (86%), >1% to ≤10% in 54/492 (11%) and >10% in 13/492 (3%). Responses and outcomes according to transcript levels are presented in table 1. Patients with BCR-ABLIS >10% at 3 months achieved inferior CCgR and MMR rates at 1 year and inferior MR4.0 rate at 2 years, but the long-term outcome was comparable to patients with transcript levels < 10%. On the contrary, a BCR-ABLIS >1% at 3 months was associated, not only to lower subsequent response rates, but also to significantly inferior FFS, PFS and OS. The BCR-ABLIS levels able to predict for FFS, PFS and OS with maximal sensitivity and specificity (ROC curves) were 1.9%, 0.8% and 0.8%, respectively. Results were similar, with small differences, in the 6-month analysis. Conclusions. In a multicentric nationwide experience, the proportion of patients with BCR-ABLIS transcript levels >10% at 3 and 6 months was low. The risk distribution and the proportion of patients treated with high-dose IM may explain, at least in part, the differences with other published reports. At 3 and 6 months, a BCR-ABLIS cutoff of 1% was a reliable surrogate marker of response and outcome. A transcript level >10% identified a smaller cohort with inferior responses, but failed to predict the long-term outcome. A BCR-ABLIS level >1% at 3 and 6 months represents a warning, requiring a close monitoring. A switch to 2nd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be considered. Acknowledgments. University of Bologna, BolognaAIL, COFIN, Fondazione Carisbo. Disclosures: Castagnetti: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gugliotta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Abruzzese:Bristol Myers-Squibb and Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavazzini:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Soverini:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Martinelli:Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rosti:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcome of Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Nilotinib Front-Line

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Franck E Nicolini ◽  
Vincent Alcazer ◽  
Pascale Cony-Makhoul ◽  
Stephanie Dulucq ◽  
Sandrine Hayette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Nilotinib (NIL) 600 mg daily has demonstrated its superiority over Imatinib 400 mg daily in terms of response and incidence of deep molecular response in the front-line chronic phase (CP) CML setting. In this observational study we have retrospectively analyzed the outcome of in- and out-study 202 patients (pts) treated in this setting with NIL 600 mg front-line, in "real-life" conditions. All pts with newly diagnosed adult CP-CML receiving NIL 300 mg BID alone front-line between 10/2007 and 06/2020, were eligible for this study. Data were retrospectively collected according to the current French regulations with pts' information. All pts were assessed and followed according to ELN recommendations 2003, 2006, and 2009 along treatment and to the recommendations from the French group of CML (D. Rea et al., Cancer 2018) in case of TFR. In this regard, a TKI was resumed if loss of MMR. All BCR-ABL1 assessments were performed in the 3 reference laboratories, standardised and expressed in % (IS) with ≥32,000 copies of ABL1 as control. The primary endpoints were the rate of molecular responses in the long-term and the (vascular) safety of Nilotinib. Secondary endpoints were the kinetics of molecular response, survival and safety of Nilotinib. Survival (OS, PFS & EFS) was defined according to ELN (J. Guilhot et al. Blood 2012). Two hundred and two patients were reported with 44% females and 56% males with a median age at diagnosis of 50.4 (17.5-83) years, and 26% of them had cardiovascular risk factors at onset (tobacco abuse 11%, hypercholesterolemia 9.3%, diabetes 1.45%, none with past history of cardiovascular events [CVE]). ELTS scores were high in 14%, intermediate in 31% and low in 55% of pts. Twenty-four (12%) pts harboured additional chromosomal abnormalities at diagnosis. The median follow-up after NIL initiation was 61.5 (1-147.5) months. At last follow-up 113 pts (55%) are not on NIL anymore for toxicities, TFR or resistance reasons. Twenty-eight (14%) pts present an arterial event on NIL (18% PAOD, 14% angina pectoralis, 7% myocardial infarction, 14% stroke, 47% others such as atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy...), that occurred after a median of 26 (0.6-98.5) months on NIL. Forty-six (22.5%) pts reached TFR criteria and stopped NIL after a median of 58.5 (27-126) months. The cumulative incidence (CI) rates of MMR at 1, 2 and 5 years were 64 (57-71)%, 79.4 (75.45-83.35)% and 95 (92-98.5)% respectively. For MR4, those were 35.5 (29-42)%, 60 (52-67)% and 82 (74.5-89)% respectively; and for MR4.5, were 14 (9-19)%, 31 (24-28)% and 62 (54-70.5)% respectively. The CI of sustained MR4.5 (i. e. patients eligible for TFR: MR4.5 ≥2 years) was observed in 30 (23-37)% at 3 years, 45.5 (36-55)% at 5 years and 52.5 (41.5-64)% at 6 years (Figure). The CI of patients entering TFR was 16.75 (10.5-23)% at 5 years and 51.94 (37.31-66.57)% at 10 years with a survival without MMR loss of 70.7 (58- 86)% at 1 year and 65.26 (50.6-84)% at 5 years. Nine (4.5%) pts progressed towards accelerated phase (4 pts) or BC (2 lymphoid, 3 myeloid) responsible for 5 deaths at latest follow-up. Among NIL resistant patients screened, 15 were harbouring ABL1 mutations (5 Y253H, 3 E255K, 3 T315I, 1 M244V, 1 G250E, 1 F359V, 1 V299L). Overall, 10 patients died (5 from CML, 5 from unrelated causes). The probability of OS was 95.75 [95%CI: 92.9-98.7]% at 2 years and 94.8 [91.5-98.3]% at 5 years, for PFS it was 94.92 [91.7-98.2]% at 2 years and 89.5 [84.7-94.6]% at 5 years, and EFS it was 78 [72.3-84]% at 2 years and 60.25 [53.3-68.1]% at 5 years. Regarding sustained MR4.5, univariate analysis showed that female gender (HR=2.46 [1.50-4.02], p&lt;0.001) and low ELTS (HR=0.41 [0.22-0.76], p&lt;0.004) had a significant impact, while multivariate analysis confirmed the role of these 2 factors (HR=2.31 [1.41- 3.79], p=0.001 and HR= 0.52 [0.30- 0.90], p=0.02) in addition to high ELTS (HR= 0.28 [0.14- 0.58], p&lt;0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that only age impacted on the CI of CVE (HR= 1.07 [1.04-1.10], p&lt;0.001, and HR=1.07 [1.04-1.10], p&lt;0.001). NIL first-line efficiently limits progression of newly diagnosed CP-CML patients and provides high rates of sustained MR4.5, allowing TFR in a substantial proportion of pts. However, the onset of arterial occlusive events, especially in the elderly is a matter of concern in the choice of this compound at treatment initiation. Disclosures Nicolini: Incyte: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma Ltd: Consultancy. Cony-Makhoul:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Incyte Biosciences: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Dulucq:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Cayuela:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mahon:ARIAD: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Etienne:Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Early CP CML, Nilotinib 400 mg Twice Daily Frontline: Beyond 3 Years, Results Remain Excellent and Stable (A GIMEMA CML Working Party Trial)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2756-2756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Luciano Levato ◽  
Adele Capucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Party ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Multicentre Phase ◽  
Daily Dose

Abstract Abstract 2756 Background: Nilotinib is a potent and selective BCR-ABL inhibitor. The phase 3 ENESTnd trial demonstrated superior efficacy nilotinib vs. imatinib, with higher and faster molecular responses. After 24 months, the rates of progression to accelerated-blastic phase (ABP) were 0.7% and 1.1% with nilotinib 300mg and 400mg BID, respectively, significantly lower compared to imatinib (4.2%). Nilotinib has been approved for the frontline treatment of Ph+ CML. With imatinib 400mg (IRIS trial), the rate of any event and of progression to ABP were higher during the first 3–4 years. Consequently, a confirmation of the durability of responses to nilotinib beyond 3 years is extremely relevant. Aims: To evaluate the long term outcome of patients treated with nilotinib 400mg BID as frontline therapy. Methods: A multicentre phase 2 trial was conducted by the GIMEMA CML WP (ClinicalTrials.gov.NCT00481052). Median 48-month follow-up data for all patients will be presented. Definitions: MR3.0 (Major Molecular Response) as a BCR-ABL/ABL ratio <0,1%IS; MR4.0, undetectable transcript levels with ≥10,000 ABL transcripts; failures: according to the revised ELN recommendations; events: failures and treatment discontinuation for any reason. All the analysis has been made according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: 73 patients enrolled: median age 51 years; 45% low, 41% intermediate and 14% high Sokal risk. The cumulative incidence of CCgR at 12 months was 100%. CCgR at each milestone: 78%, 96%, 96%, 95%, 92% at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, respectively. The overall estimated probability of MR3.0 was 99%, while the rates of MR3.0 at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 52%, 66%, 85%, 81% and 82%, respectively. Two out of 73 patients never achieved a MR3.0, 1 who progressed to AP/BP (see below) and 1 in stable and confirmed CCgR at 36 months. Three pts had a confirmed loss of MR3.0 due to low adherence (all 3 still on nilotinib). The overall estimated probability of MR4.0 was 79%, while the rates of MR4.0 at 12, 24 and 36 months were 12%, 27% and 25%, respectively. One third (21/73 pts) showed a stable MR4.0 (defined based on 3 consecutive MR4.0 samples 4 months apart). Only one patient progressed at 6 months to ABP and subsequently died (high Sokal risk, T315I mutation). Adverse events were mostly grade 1 or 2 and manageable with appropriate dose adaptations. During the first 12 months, the mean daily dose was 600–800mg in 74% of patients. The nilotinib last daily dose was as follows: 800mg in 46 (63%) patients, 600mg in 3 (4%) patients and 400mg in 18 (25%), 6 permanent discontinuations. Detail of discontinuation: 1 patient progressed to ABP; 3 patients had recurrent episodes of amylase and/or lipase increase (no pancreatitis); 1 patient had atrial fibrillation (unrelated to study drug) and 1 patient died after 32 months of mental deterioration and starvation (unrelated to study drug). Two patients are currently on imatinib second-line and 2 on dasatinib third-line. With a median follow-up of 39 months, the estimated probability of overall survival, progression-free survival and failure-free survival was 97%, the estimated probability of event-free survival was 91%. Conclusions: The rate of failures was very low during the first 3 years. Responses remain stable. The high rates of responses achieved during the first 12–18 months are being translated into optimal outcome for most of patients. Acknowledgments: European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, Bologna University, BolognAIL Disclosures: Gugliotta: Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Honoraria. Castagnetti:Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Cuneo:Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Soverini:Novartis: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Saglio:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria.

Disease Patterns for Patients (pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) That Have BCR-ABL Transcript Levels > 10% At 3 Month of Therapy with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3757-3757
Author(s):  
Aziz Nazha ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Preetesh Jain ◽  
Elias J. Jabbour ◽  
Alfonso Quintás-Cardama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Transcript Level ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 3757 Background: Response to TKIs in CML at 3 month is a strong predictor for long term outcome in CML patients treated with TKIs. Pts who do not achieve a BCR-ABL transcript level < 10% or a MCyR at 3 months have lower event-free survival (EFS) and perhaps overall survival (OS). However, pts have rarely changed therapy based on response at this early time points. The purpose of this analysis is to understand the patterns of disease progression and management in this group of patients. Patients and Methods: A total of 489 newly diagnosed CML pts that received initial treatment with TKIs: imatinib 400 mg daily (83) imatinib 800 mg daily (199), and second generation TKIs (2GTKIs) (207) in consecutive or parallel trials between 7/2000 and 6/2011 were included in this analysis. Cytogentic and molecular responses were evaluated every 3 month for the first year and then every 6 month. Event was defined as transformation to accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP), loss of complete hematologic response (CHR), or loss of MCyR. Results: Among the 489 treated pts, 58 (12%) did not achieve a MCyR or BCR-ABL transcript level < 10 % at 3 months (26 pts (31%) received IM400, 19 (10%) IM800, and 13 (6%) 2GTKIs. Eleven of these pts (19%) had high sokal score at diagnosis (1 pt treated with imatinib 400, 7 with imatinib 800, 3 with 2GTKIs). By 6 months, 52/58 pts (90%) continued on their original therapy: 39 (67%) at the same dose and 19 (33%) with a decreased dose because of adverse events. No pt had a dose increase. Six pts had discontinued therapy by 6 month: 4 due to intolerance, 1 loss of CHR and 1 for progression to BP. At 6 month, 27 pts (47%) achieved MCyR or BCR-ABL transcript level < 10 %. At 12 months, 47 pts (81%) were still receiving their initial therapy, 11 pts (19%) had discontinued their initial TKI: 6 due to intolerance, 1 loss of CHR, 2 for progression to BP, and 2 for resistant disease. After a median follow up of 95 months, 17 pts (29%) continue to receive their initial therapy and their current disease status are: complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) in 14 (82%), 2 (12%) lost their CCyR, and 1(6%) pt who never achieve any cytogenetic or molecular response and remains in chronic phase on the same dose of imatinib for over 8 years. Among these 17 pts, 11 (65%) have MMR, 2 (12%) with MR4.5, and 4 (24%) have lost MMR (2 of them with loss of CCyR). The 5 years OS, EFS and transformation-free survival (TFS) for the patients who did not achieve any response at 3 month was 88%, 77%, and 94%, respectively. The OS, EFS, and TFS for the patients who subsequently achieved a response (MCyR or BCR-ABL transcript level < 10 %) at 6 month was 100%, 66%, and 95%, respectively vs those who continued to have no response 79%, 95%, and 100%, respectively (P = 0.17, 0.07, 0.99, respectively). Conclusions: Although BCR-ABL transcript level at 3 month may predict long-term outcome of pts with CML treated with TKIs, this represents a static, one-time measure. Assessing the response at 6 months of pts with poor response at 3 months may provide a better predictor of long term outcome. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding.

4-Year Outcome Of 215 Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Treated Frontline With Nilotinib In Investigator-Sponsored Studies. A Report From The Gimema CML Working Party

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4000-4000
Author(s):  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Luciano Levato ◽  
Giovanna Rege-Cambrin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Rotation Period ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

Abstract Background Nilotinib is a potent and selective BCR-ABL inhibitor approved for the frontline treatment of CML. The latest update (4-yr follow-up) of the ENESTnd study demonstrated sustained superiority of nilotinib vs. imatinib (Hochhaus et al, EHA 2013, abstract 712). The CML Italian Registry of Nilotinib is the largest series of patients treated frontline with nilotinib-based regimens, outside of Company-sponsored trials. Therefore, it represents an important resource for an independent evaluation of the outcome of such patients. Aims to analyze the response rates and outcome in an independent cohort of patients treated frontline with nilotinib-based regimens in Italy. Methods The CML Italian Registry of Nilotinib includes 215 patients, enrolled in 2 multicenter phase II studies conducted by the GIMEMA CML WP (ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT00481052 and NCT00769327) with nilotinib 300 mg or 400 mg BID as initial treatment; 123 patients received a sequential treatment with nilotinib and imatinib, with a 3-mo rotation period. The median age was 53 years (range 18–86). Ten out of 215 patients (5%) had a high EUTOS score. The median follow-up was 43 months (range 18–69 months). We analyzed: the rates of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) and Major Molecular Response (MMR); the overall survival (OS; any death included), progression-free survival (PFS; progression to accelerated/blast phase [AP/BP] and deaths for any cause), failure-free survival (FFS; failures according to ELN 2013 recommendations and deaths for any cause), and event-free survival (EFS; events: failures, permanent discontinuation of nilotinib for any cause, including deaths). Results Rates of CCyR were 72% and 92% by 3 months and 12 months, respectively. Rates of MMR were 56% and 83% by 3 months and 12 months, respectively. The cumulative rates of CCyR and MMR were 93% and 92%, respectively. Overall, events were recorded in 64 (30%) patients: 31 (14%) patients permanently discontinued nilotinib for adverse events or intolerance; 22 (10%) patients failed therapy according to ELN 2013 recommendations, including 8 (3.7%) patients that progressed to AP/BP; 11 (5%) patients permanently discontinued nilotinib for other reasons. All progressions to AP/BP occurred within the first year of therapy, and all patients subsequently died. Nilotinib-resistant mutations were identified in 5 of these patients (4 T315I; 1 Y253H). No difference in the rate of progression to AP/BP was observed between patients receiving nilotinib alone or nilotinib and imatinib in sequential schedule. Overall, 15 (7%) patients died, in 7 cases for reasons unrelated to CML progression. The 4-year OS, PFS, FFS, and EFS were 93%, 93%, 86%, and 69%, respectively. Conclusion These Italian nilotinib registry data provide an independent and unbiased overview of the therapeutic effects of nilotinib, with high and early rates of complete cytogenetic and major molecular response. All progressions (3.7%) to AP or BP occurred within the 1st year of therapy; however, all cases were fatal, emphasizing how crucial is the prevention of AP/BP. With a median follow-up of 43 months, 69% of patients were still on nilotinib, and 93% were alive and progression-free. Acknowledgments European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, Bologna University, BolognAIL Disclosures: Gugliotta: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Castagnetti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bocchia:Novartis and Bristol Mayer Squibb: Honoraria. Soverini:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Baccarani:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria. Rosti:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy; Roche: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Second TKI Discontinuation in CML Patients That Failed First Discontinuation and Subsequently Regained Deep Molecular Response after TKI Re-Challenge

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 788-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Pagliardini ◽  
Franck E. Nicolini ◽  
Stephane Giraudier ◽  
Philippe Rousselot ◽  
Gabriel Etienne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Deep Molecular Response ◽  
Tki Discontinuation

Abstract Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are able to induce, in some chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, long-term undetectable molecular disease (UMD). Several studies have now demonstrated that TKIs could be safely discontinued in those patients previously treated with imatinib (STIM, TWISTER, EUROSKI) and more recently with nilotinib and dasatinib (STOP 2G-TKI). All these studies show a Treatment-Free Remission (TFR) rate reaching ~50%. However, a major issue needs to be resolved for the ~50% of patients that fail such TFR strategies. Methods: We have previously reported the possibility of a second imatinib discontinuation in 16 patients who obtained a second UMD state according to the STIM criteria (RE-STIM observational study, Legros et al. Blood 2012). Here, we report a larger cohort of patients who attempt twice TKI-discontinuations with enlarged inclusion criteria: Adults CML patients without prior allogeneic transplantation or progression to advanced phase CML undergoing a 2nd attempt of TKI discontinuation for sustained deep molecular response after a 1st failure. All patients were followed in CML reference centers and according to the EUTOS-ELN accreditation criteria for BCR-ABL assessments with minimal numbers of 32,000 ABL copies/sample. Results: At the time of analysis (1st July 2016), 67 patients (median age: 51 years (range: 25-80 years)) were included. At CML diagnosis, 64 patients were in chronic phase (CP) and 3 patients in accelerated phase (AP). The Sokal risk and the EUTOS long-term survival scores (ELTS) were respectively low in 47% and 68%, intermediate in 36% and 16%, high in 11% and 2% and unknown in 6% and 14% of patients. All patients were treated initially with imatinib and 16% of patients switch to nilotinib (6/11) or to dasatinib (5/11) for intolerance/resistance reasons prior to the 1st TKI discontinuation. The median time on TKI prior to the 1st discontinuation was 63 months (range: 30-146) and the median duration of 1st CMR was 35 months (range: 20-85). The 1st molecular relapse occurred with a median of 2.5 months (range: 0-22) and the second UMD after TKI re-challenge was obtained with a median of 4.4 months (0-40). The reason of the TKI re-challenge was loss of UMD in 43%, loss of MMR in 55% and unknown in 1%. The TKI re-challenge (imatinib 73%, nilotinib 16%, dasatinib 11%) was then administered during a median of 31 months (range: 9-72 months) before the 2nd attempt of discontinuation. At 2nd TKI cessation, 85% of patients were in UMD, 3% in MR4.5, 6 % in MR4, 3% in MMR and 3% unknown. Thirty out of sixty-eight (44%) patients remained treatment-free after a median follow-up of 21.5 months (1-106), see figure. Similarly to 1st attempts, the majority of loss of MMR occurred during the first 6-12 months in this 2nd attempt cohort. Gender, age, disease phase, prognosis scores, prior interferon exposure, initial TKI type, and duration of UMD were not found to have any impact on the outcome after the 2nd attempt in a multivariate analysis. In contrast, a longer time to obtain the first UMD before the 1st attempt was associated with a significantly lower molecular disease-free survival rate after the 2nd discontinuation (p = 0.048). All patients are alive at last follow-up except one who died from an unrelated CML reason (heart attack under imatinib). Conclusion: TKIs could safely and successfully be discontinued a second time in CML pts despite a 1st failure. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Nicolini: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Etienne:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Huguet:Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Ariad, Jazz, Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Guerci-Bresler:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ARIAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mahon:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Updated 18-Month Results from Dasfree: A Study Evaluating Dasatinib Discontinuation in Patients (Pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and Deep Molecular Response (DMR)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4253-4253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil P. Shah ◽  
Jose Valentín García Gutiérrez ◽  
Antonio Jiménez-Velasco ◽  
Sarah Larson ◽  
Susanne Saussele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) discontinuation is being investigated in pts with CML-CP with sustained DMR (defined here as MR4.5 or BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.0032% on the International Scale [IS]), with the goal of treatment-free remission (TFR). Successful TFR has been reported previously for pts enrolled in DASFREE (CA180-406/NCT01850004), which showed that 48% of CML-CP pts with DMR for ≥ 1 year were able to stop dasatinib and maintain major molecular response (MMR) 12 months after discontinuation. Here we present updated results from pts followed for a minimum of 18 months, in order to understand the durability of TFR beyond 12 months. Methods: DASFREE is a phase 2, open-label, single-arm study in adult pts with CML-CP on dasatinib for ≥ 2 years as 1st-line or subsequent therapy. Eligible pts had dasatinib-induced DMR (MR4.5) confirmed at a local lab for ≥ 1 year prior to enrollment, with a 1-log reduction in BCR-ABL1 from baseline within 3-6.5 months of starting dasatinib. MR4.5 was confirmed at a central lab twice within 3 months prior to dasatinib discontinuation (screening phase). BCR-ABL1 was monitored centrally after discontinuation every month in the 1st year, then every 3 months. Pts resumed dasatinib at their previous dose if MMR was lost. The primary endpoint is the rate of MMR 12 months after dasatinib discontinuation. Secondary endpoints include BCR-ABL1 kinetics, molecular relapse-free survival (MRFS; no loss of MMR), relapse-free survival (RFS; no loss of MMR, complete cytogenetic response, or complete hematologic response, or progression to accelerated/blast phase [AP/BP] CML), rate of transformation to AP/BP, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory analyses include frequency of adverse events (AEs) after discontinuation and during dasatinib treatment, and MMR after reinitiating dasatinib. Results: In total, 84 pts enrolled between February 2014 and June 2016 discontinued dasatinib; all had ≥ 18 months of follow-up after discontinuation at the time of this analysis. Pt characteristics were previously reported (the majority [64%] had low Sokal scores; no pt had prior interferon; 37 pts were on 1st-line dasatinib, 47 on subsequent lines of dasatinib). At 18 months after discontinuation, the RFS rate was 48% (95% CI 37-58) in all pts (Figure), 54% (95% CI 38, 70) in 1st-line pts, and 42% (95% CI 28, 57) in pts who received subsequent-line therapy. With longer follow-up, 1 additional pt lost MMR at 18 months following discontinuation. Of the 45 pts who lost MMR and restarted treatment, 44 regained MMR (1 pt discontinued after only 1 molecular assessment) in a median of 2 months (range 1-4) and 42 regained MR4.5 in a median of 3 months (range 2-18). Analyses of baseline pt characteristics revealed that for the 40 pts who did not lose MMR after discontinuation, 15 (37.5%) were able to maintain MR4.5. Additionally, the median time in prior MR4.5 was 28 months (range 13-116) for all pts, and was similar for 1st-line pts who maintained (27 months [range 13-56]) or lost MMR (27 months [range 15-68]) at 12 months. With longer follow-up, AEs (any cause) identified were consistent with previous reports and were found to be similar on and off treatment: 8 (10%) pts off treatment and 8 (18%) pts on treatment experienced grade 3/4 AEs of any cause after restarting dasatinib (4.4% were drug related). No transformation events or deaths occurred. Of the 13 reported withdrawal events occurring in 8 (9.5%) pts, 10 were resolved (5 off treatment, 5 resolved after restarting treatment due to loss of MMR) after a median of 5 months (range 1-12) after onset. One pt discontinued after restarting dasatinib due to malignancy unrelated to treatment. In addition to efficacy and safety data, multivariate analyses evaluating prognostic factors for MMR will be presented. Conclusions: Additional follow-up of pts enrolled in DASFREE revealed that TFR remained durable at 18 months after discontinuing dasatinib. AEs reported here were consistent with the known safety profile of dasatinib, and withdrawal was well tolerated. Collectively, this trial, the largest dasatinib discontinuation trial to date, continues to support the feasibility and practicality of TFR in pts with CML-CP in DMR treated with dasatinib in the 1st line and beyond. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Shah: ARIAD: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. García Gutiérrez:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Larson:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Saussele:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Rea:Incyte: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria. Mahon:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Levy:Takeda (Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.): Consultancy. Gómez-Casares:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Pane:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy. Nicolini:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mauro:Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sy:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Martin Regueira:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lipton:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Long-Term Follow-up of the Randomized Controlled Study in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Severe Aplastic Anemia Treated with ATG, Cyclosporine, with or without G-CSF: On Behalf of the SAA Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1307-1307
Author(s):  
André Tichelli ◽  
Regis Peffault De Latour ◽  
Jakob R. Passweg ◽  
Cora Knol ◽  
Gérard Socié ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Late Complications ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Secondary Mds

Abstract Introduction The prospective randomized study on treatment of 192 severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients with ATG and Cyclosporine (CSA) with and without G-CSF showed that G-CSF added to ATG/CSA decreases the rate of early infection episodes and days of hospitalization in very SAA (vSAA) patients, but has no significant impact on overall survival (OS), event free survival (EFS), relapse, or death rates (Blood, 2011;17:4434). The number of secondary MDS/AML was low, however with a short observation time. Now, 16 years after initiation of the study, a follow-up was planned to evaluate long-term outcome, comparing patients with and without G-CSF. Patients and Methods A total of 192 patients with newly diagnosed SAA, not eligible for stem cell transplantation (SCT) were entered into this prospective randomized multi-center study to receive ATG/CSA with (49.5%) or without G-CSF (50.5%). In 2011, 44 of the 192 patients had died. For the present study the follow-up of the 148 patients alive at time of first publication were requested. There were 49% males (49% G-CSF; 48% no G-CSF), 36% with vSAA (32% G-CSF; 41% no G-CSF). The median age at randomization was 46 years (2-80), 47 (2-80) for the G-CSF and 44 (7-80) for the non-G-CSF group. The median follow-up using reverse KM method was 11.7 years (10.9-12.5). Results Among the 110 survivors (17 missing), 71 (65%) were in CR, 33 (30%) in PR and 6 not in remission (5%), without any difference between the G-CSF and non-G-CSF group (P=0.523). At last follow-up 65 (34%) of the patients have died. Causes of death were infection (26), bleeding (3), SAA unspecified (3), MDS/AML (4), solid cancer (3), transplant related mortality (8), cardiovascular/aging (7), or unspecified (11). There was no difference in the causes of death between patients treated with or without G-CSF. OS at 15 years was 57±12% for the G-CSF and 63±12% for the non-G-CSF group (P=0.927). EFS, including SCT, relapse, non-response at day 120, second MDS/AML, PNH or death as an event, was 24±10% for the G-CSF, and 23±10% for the non-G-CSF group (P=0.367). Nine patients developed florid or morphological signs of MDS/AML, 9 clonal cytogenetic anomaly only, 7 a solid cancer, 18 clinical PNH, 8 avascular osteonecrosis, and 12 chronic kidney disease (No difference between patients treated with or without G-CSF). Cumulative incidence (CI) at 15 years of MDS/AML (isolated cytogenetic anomalies not included) was 5.0±2% (G-CSF) and 7.3±3% (no G-CSF), respectively (P=0.693); for clinical PNH it was 10.1±5% and 13.3±7% (P=0.499), for relapse of responding patients at day 120, 29.8±22% and 25.1±17% (P=0.545), and for chronic kidney failure 16%±12% and 13%±12% (P=0.513), respectively. Forty patients needed a second line immunosuppressive therapy (IST) for relapse (17), refractory disease (8), cyclosporine dependence (6) or isolated cytopenia (9) (G-CSF 26; no G-CSF 16; P=0.291); 16 patients needed a third line IST for relapse (5), refractory disease (7), isolated cytopenia (4) (G-CSF 12; no G-CSF 4; P=0.647). Twenty-eight patients were treated with allogeneic SCT in second or subsequent line (G-CSF 12; no G-CSF 16). CI at 15 years of SCT (competing risk, death without SCT) was 14±8% (G-CSF) and 22%±10% (no G-CSF), respectively (P=0.380). OS at 10 years since SCT was 46±24%. The most important risk factors for patients treated with ATG/CSA with or without G-CSF were age and severity of the disease at randomization: OS at 15 years was 89±12% (<20 years), 81±13% (20-40 years), 55±15% (40-60 years), and 32±16% (>60 years of age), respectively (P>0.001), and 64±5% and 52±7% for patients with SAA and vSAA, respectively (P=0.021). There was no difference between patients treated with or without G-CSF. Finally, the lack of neutrophil response by day 30, which was significant at first evaluation, is still associated with borderline lower survival (46.6±14% versus 67.1±9%; P=0.058). Conclusion: Long-term outcome of SAA patients treated with ATG/CSA was not influenced by supplementing G-CSF in term of OS, EFS, death rates, relapse, PNH, secondary MDS/AML, solid cancer and non-malignant late complications. Due to the pre-cancer nature of the disease and its long-lasting treatment, patients treated with IST are at risk for a number of malignant and non-malignant late complications. It is somewhat disappointing that in this careful followed cohort less than 25% of patients are alive and event-free 10-15 years after initial treatment. Disclosures Peffault De Latour: Pfizer Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hoechsmann:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Schrezenmeier:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kulasekararaj:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support . Bader:Neovii: Research Funding; Cellgene: Consultancy; Riemser: Research Funding; Medac: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Risitano:Pfizer Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amyndas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Excellent Outcomes at 3 Years with Nilotinib 800 Mg Daily In Early Chronic Phase, Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML): Results of a Phase 2 GIMEMA CML WP Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 359-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Luciano Levato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Cumulative Rate

Abstract Abstract 359 Background: Nilotinib is a potent and selective inhibitor of BCR-ABL. In the phase 3 ENESTnd trial, nilotinib demonstrated superior efficacy to imatinib with higher and faster molecular responses. With a median follow-up of 18.5 months (ASCO/EHA 2010), the rates of progression to accelerated or blast phase (AP/BC) were 0.7% and 0.4% with nilotinib 300 mg and 400 mg BID, respectively, and significantly lower in comparison to imatinib (4.2% P = .006 and .003, respectively). Based on the results of the ENESTnd trial, nilotinib has been approved (FDA) for the frontline treatment of Ph+ CML. With imatinib 400 mg (IRIS trial), the rate of any event and the rate of progression to AP/BC were higher during the first 3 years on treatment (15.6% and 6.1%, respectively). Consequently, a confirmation of the durability of nilotinib responses at 3 years is extremely important. Aims: To evaluate responses (either cytogenetic and molecular) and to investigate outcomes of patients treated for 3-years with nilotinib 400 mg BID as frontline therapy. Outcomes evaluated include Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Failure-Free Survival (FFS) and Event-Free Survival (EFS). Method: A multicentre phase 2 trial (nilotinib 400 mg BID) was conducted by the GIMEMA CML Working Party (ClinicalTrials.gov.NCT00481052). The median follow-up is currently 30 months (3 years by November 2010). Definitions: Major Molecular Response (MMR): BCR-ABL/ABL ratio < 0,1% IS; Complete Molecular Response (CMR): undetectable transcript levels and nested PCR negative; failures: no CHR at 3 months, no CgR at 6 months, no PCgR at 1 year, no CCgR at 18 months, loss CHR or CCgR, progression and death (according to the revised European LeukemiaNet recommendations); events: failures and treatment discontinuation for any reason. All the analysis has been made according to the intention-to-treat principle. Result: 73 patients have been enrolled; median age 51 years (range 18–83); 45% low, 41% intermediate and 14% high Sokal risk. The cumulative CCgR rate (primary endpoint) at 12 months was 100%. CCgR at each milestone: 78% at 3 months, 96% at 6, 12 and 18 months, 92% at 24 months. The cumulative rate of MMR was 96%, while the rates of MMR at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months were 52%, 66%, 85%, 81% and 82%, respectively. The cumulative rate of CMR was 41%, while the rates of CMR at 12 and 24 months were 7% and 12%, respectively. None of the patients who achieved a MMR progressed to AP/BC. Only one patient progressed at 6 months to AP/BC: a 63 years old female with a high Sokal risk disease in CCgR at 3 months, who developed a T315I mutation. During the first 12 months, the mean daily dose was 600–800 mg, 400–599 mg, and less than 400 mg in 74%, 18% and 8% of patients, respectively. The nilotinib last daily dose was as follows: 800 mg in 48 (71%) patients, 400 mg in 19 (28%) patients and 200 mg in 1 (1%) patient. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly grade 1 or 2 and manageable with appropriate dose adaptations. Two patients (3%) showed a prolongation of the QTcF above 450 msec (none above 50 msec). Four events lead to permanent discontinuation of nilotinib: 3 patients discontinued after 9, 15 and 27 months on treatment for recurrent episodes of amylase and/or lipase increase (no pancreatitis) and 1 patient after 25 months due to atrial fibrillation, unrelated to study drug. Three of them are currently on imatinib second-line and 1 on dasatinib third-line. Overall, 5 events have been recorded so far (1 progression to AB/BC and 4 permanent discontinuation of nilotinib due to AEs). At 30 months the OS, PFS and FFS are 99% and the EFS is 92%. Conclusion: The rate of failures was very low during the first 3 years. Responses remain stable. The very high rates of responses achieved during the first 12 months on treatment are being translated into optimal outcome for most of the patients. Acknowledgments: European LeukemiaNet, COFIN, Bologna University, BolognAIL Disclosures: Rosti: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau. Castagnetti:Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Gugliotta:Novartis: Honoraria. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; pfizer: Consultancy. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Wyeth: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Achieving a Complete Molecular Remission Under Imatinib Therapy Is Associated with a Better Outcome in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Patients On Imatinib Frontline Therapy

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3754-3754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Etienne ◽  
Nicolini E Nicolini ◽  
Stéphanie Dulucq ◽  
Anna Schmitt ◽  
Sandrine Hayette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Survival Studies

Abstract Abstract 3754 Background Imatinib (IM) has dramatically improved the prognosis of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. Some of them will achieve a so-call complete molecular remission (CMR) that allows when it is sustained treatment discontinuation without relapse. Aims Aims of this study were i) to evaluate the frequency of CMR in IM de novo CML-CP patients, ii) to identify baseline and ongoing predictive factors of CMR in patients who had achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) on IM therapy, iii) to assess if achieving a CMR with IM frontline therapy is associated with a better event and progression-free survival. Methods Unselected CML chronic phase patients under frontline IM therapy were considered. CMR was defined as undetectable BCR-ABL transcript with sensitivity of at least 4·5 log on two consecutive analyses at least two months apart. Event-free survival (EFS) referred to survival without loss of complete hematologic response, loss of complete CCyR, detection of a BCR-ABL domain kinase point mutation associated with a high level of IM resistance, progression to accelerated or blastic phase, death of any cause on or off therapy, off treatment for toxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS) referred to survival without events previously described with the exception of treatment cessation for toxicity. EFS and PFS and overall survival were measured from the date of the first CCyR on therapy to the date of event. Among patients who failed to achieve a CMR, patients with a follow-up lower than the observed median time to CMR and without any reported event were excluded for the identification of predictive factors of CMR and survival studies . Results 266 patients diagnosed with CML-CP and treated with IM frontline were included between July 2000 and June 2010. The median age was 56 years (range 17–89), 160 (60%) were male. 86% of the patients received an initial IM daily dose of 400 mg. Sixty-five (24%) patients had IM dose increase to at least 600 mg. The median follow-up was 4,43 years (range 0.79–10 .8). At the time of the analysis 88 (33%) patients had stopped IM. Two hundred and thirty three patients achieved a CCyR while on IM. Among them, 35 (13%) had a CCyR without major molecular response (MMR), 133 (50%) a CCyR with MMR without CMR, 65 (24%) a CCyR with CMR. The median time to CMR was 32.7 months (range 2.6 to 87.9). Forty six out of the 65 patients (70%) were still in CMR at the last follow-up with a median duration of CMR of 35.4 months (range, 4.1 to 91.5 months). For patients who achieved a CMR, the probability of remaining in CMR at two years is 68%. Twelve out of 35 patients of the CCyR+MMR- group, 41 out of 133 patients of the CCyR+MMR+CMR- group had a follow-up below the observed median time to CMR and without any reported event during follow-up were excluded for the identification of CMR predictive factors and survival studies. In multivariate analysis, spleen enlargement below the costal margin at diagnosis was negatively associated with the achievement of a CMR (HR:0.354 CI95%:0.192–0.654; p=0.0009) while shorter time from IM start to the first CCyR (CCyR before or after 12 months, HR:0.5; IC95%:0.27–0.95; p=0.034) and MMR (before or after 12 months; HR:0.2147;IC95%:0.092–0.5; p=0.00038) were strongly associated with the probability of achieving a CMR. Patients who achieved a CMR had a better EFS and PFS than those with CCyR irrespective of MMR status (95.2% vs 64.7% vs 27.7% p=0.00124; 98.4% vs 82.3% vs 56% p=0.0335) (figures 1a and 1b). Overall survival was not different between the 3 groups. Conclusion This study points out that once patients achieve a CCyR on IM therapy, achieving a further deeper molecular response is associated with a better EFS and PFS, CMR confering the best outcome. Disclosures: Etienne: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nicolini:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ARIAD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mahon:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document