Impact Of The Pretreatment Characteristics As Well As Cyto- and Molecular-Genetic Profile On Outcome After Relapse In Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 830-830
Author(s):  
Richard F. Schlenk ◽  
Peter Frech ◽  
Sabine Kayser ◽  
Daniela Späth ◽  
Peter Brossart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Molecular Genetic ◽  
Initial Diagnosis ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Genetic Abnormalities ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Cyto- and molecular-genetic abnormalities evaluated at initial diagnosis are the most powerful prognostic and in part also predictive markers in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with regard to achievement of complete remission (CR) and survival. Nonetheless, after relapse the prognostic impact of clinical characteristics and genetic abnormalities assessed at initial diagnosis with respect to achievement of subsequent CR and survival are less clear. Aims To evaluate the probability of CR achievement and survival in relapsed AML patients in correlation to clinical characteristics and genetic abnormalities assessed at initial diagnosis as well as treatment strategy. Methods The study includes intensively treated adults with newly diagnosed AML enrolled in 5 prospective AMLSG treatment trials between 1993 and 2009. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. All patients received intensive therapy, including allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during first line therapy. Results A total of 3218 patients (median age, 54 years; range, 16-85 years) were enrolled in 5 AMLSG treatment trials. Of these, 1307 (41%) patients (16-60 years, n=958; ≥61 years, n=349) experienced relapse, n=194 after alloHSCT, n=75 after autoHSCT and 1038 after chemotherapy. Salvage strategies were as follows: (i) n=907, intensive chemotherapy (INT) followed in n=450 by HSCT (matched related donor [MRD], n=114; matched unrelated donor [MUD], n=303; cord blood graft [CB], n=3; haplo-identical family donor [HID], n=18; autoHSCT, n=12); (ii) n=100, direct alloHSCT (MRD, n=31; MUD, n=63; HID, n=4) or n=2 autoHSCT (TPL); (iii) n=29, donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) in patients after alloHSCT in CR1; (iv) n=60, demethylating agents/low-dose cytarabine (NON-INT); (v) n=24, experimental treatment within phase I/II studies (EXP); (vi) all other patients (n=187) received best supportive care (BSC). After salvage therapy CR rate was 38% and after the different treatment approaches as follows: INT, 37%; TPL, 73%; DLI, 38%; NON-INT, 8%; EXP, 29%. After failure to respond to INT, n=159 additional patients achieved a CR2 after HSCT resulting in an overall CR2 rate of 50%. A logistic regression model revealed CEBPA double-mutant (dm) (OR, 6.42; p=0.0001), core-binding factor (CBF) AML (OR, 2.87; p=0.0002), a direct HSCT strategy (OR, 3.32; p=0.0002), and mutated NPM1 (OR, 1.59; p=0.02) as favorable (only if response after HSCT was included) and FLT3-ITD (OR, 0.66; p=0.04), age (difference of 10 years; OR, 0.82; p=0.003), NON-INT (OR, 0.08; p=0.0001) and in trend a previous alloHSCT in CR1 (OR, 0.65; p=0.08) as unfavorable independent parameters for achievement of CR2. Median follow-up for survival after relapse was 4.3 years and survival after 4 years was 22% (95%-CI, 19-25%). Patients proceeding to alloHSCT after first relapse (n=536; MRD, n=145; MUD, n=366; HID, n=22; CB, n=3) had a 4-year survival of 36% (95%-CI, 32-41%) and those not proceeding to alloHSCT of 8% (95%-CI, 6-11%). In univariable analyses the combined genotype mutated NPM1 in the absence of FLT3-ITD (p=0.66) was not associated with a favorable outcome. A multivariable regression model including alloHSCT as a time-dependent co-variable revealed alloHSCT performed after relapse (HR, 0.34; p<0.0001), CEBPAdm (HR, 0.48; p=0.002), CBF- AML (HR, 0.50; p<0.0003) and DLI in relapsed patients with a previous alloHSCT performed in CR1 (HR, 0.40; p=0.002) as significant favorable factors, whereas FLT3-ITD (HR, 1.35; p=0.005) and in trend NON-INT (OR, 1.40; p=0.06) were unfavorable factors. Due to collinearity of FLT3-ITD with duration of first remission (cut point at 1 yr), the latter was not included into the multivariable models. Of 561 patients achieving CR2, 252 experienced 2nd relapse (REL2) and 114 died in CR2. Most REL2 patients (n=117) received INT whereas n=54 received BSC only. Allo- and autoHSCT were performed in 55 and 3 REL2 patients, respectively. CR3 rate in patients who received treatment was overall 40% including response to HSCT of 58%. Conclusions Patients with relapsed AML have an overall probability of less than 50% to achieve a CR2 and CR3 after intensive salvage chemotherapy; the only exceptions are AML with CEBPAdm and CBF-AML. AlloHSCT either as direct treatment of relapse or as salvage therapy after failure of intensive chemotherapy may overcome chemo-resistance. Disclosures: Schlenk: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Ambit: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide in Myelofibrosis. Kindler:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Mini- Vs. Regular-Dose CLAG-M (Cladribine, Cytarabine, G-CSF, and Mitoxantrone) in Medically Less Fit Adults with Newly-Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Other High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1364-1364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna B. Halpern ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Kelda Gardner ◽  
Genevieve Alcorn ◽  
Mary-Elizabeth M. Percival ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Intensive Therapy ◽  
Treatment Intensity ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Myeloid Neoplasms ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background: Optimal treatment for medically less fit adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains uncertain. Retrospective data suggest intensive therapy may lead to better outcomes in these patients. However, these findings must be interpreted cautiously because of the possibility of selection bias and other confounders. Ideally, the optimal treatment intensity is defined via randomized trial but whether patients and their physicians are amenable to such a study is unknown. We therefore designed a trial (NCT03012672) to 1) evaluate the feasibility of randomization between intensive and non-intensive therapy in this population and 2) examine the impact of treatment intensity on response rate and survival. We used CLAG-M as high-dose cytarabine-based intensive induction therapy. Rather than selecting different classes of drugs in the 2 treatment arms- which may have different modes of action and therefore confound the question of treatment intensity - we used reduced-dose ("mini") CLAG-M as the non-intensive comparator. Methods: Adults ≥18 years were eligible if they had untreated AML or high-grade myeloid neoplasms (≥10% blasts in blood or marrow) and were medically less fit as defined by having a "treatment related mortality" (TRM) score of ≥13.1, corresponding to a &gt;10-15% 28-day mortality with intensive chemotherapy. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% was the only organ function exclusion. Patient-physician pairs were first asked if they were amenable to randomized treatment allocation. If so, they were randomized 1:1 to mini- vs. regular-dose CLAG-M. If not, in order to evaluate our secondary endpoints, the patient or physician could choose the treatment arm and still enroll on study. Patients and physicians then completed surveys elucidating their decision-making processes. Up to 2 induction courses were given with mini- vs. regular-dose CLAG-M: cladribine 2 or 5 mg/m2/day (days 1-5), cytarabine 100 or 2,000 mg/m2/day (days 1-5), G-CSF 300 or 480µcg/day for weight &lt;/≥76kg in both arms (days 0-5), and mitoxantrone 6 or 18 mg/m2/day (days 1-3). CLAG at identical doses was used for post-remission therapy for up to 4 (regular-dose CLAG) or 12 (mini-CLAG) cycles. The primary endpoint was feasibility of randomization, defined as ≥26/50 of patient-physician pairs agreeing to randomization. Secondary outcomes included rate of complete remission (CR) negative for measurable ("minimal") residual disease (MRD), rate of CR plus CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CR+CRi), and overall survival (OS). Results: This trial enrolled 33 patients. Only 3 (9%) patient/physician pairs agreed to randomization and thus randomization was deemed infeasible (primary endpoint). Eighteen pairs chose mini-CLAG-M and 12 regular-dose CLAG-M for a total of 19 subjects in the lower dose and 14 subjects in the higher dose arms. The decision favoring lower dose treatment was made largely by the physician in 5/18 (28%) cases, the patient in 11/18 (61%) cases and both in 2/18 (11%). The decision favoring the higher dose arm was made by the patient in most cases 9/12 (75%), both physician and patient in 2/12 (16%) and the physician in only 1/12 (8%) cases. Despite the limitations of lack of randomization, patients' baseline characteristics were well balanced with regard to age, performance status, TRM score, lab values and cytogenetic/mutational risk categories (Table 1). One patient was not yet evaluable for response or TRM at data cutoff. Rates of MRDneg CR were comparable: 6/19 (32%) in the lower and 3/14 (21%) in the higher dose groups (p=0.70). CR+CRi rates were also similar in both arms (43% vs. 56% in lower vs. higher dose arms; p=0.47). Three (16%) patients experienced early death in the lower dose arm vs. 1 (7%) in the higher dose arm (p=0.43). With a median follow up of 4.2 months, there was no survival difference between the two groups (median OS of 6.1 months in the lower vs. 4.7 months in the higher dose arm; p=0.81; Figure 1). Conclusions: Randomization of medically unfit patients to lower- vs. higher-intensity therapy was not feasible, and physicians rarely chose higher intensity therapy in this patient group. Acknowledging the limitation of short follow-up time and small sample size, our trial did not identify significant differences in outcomes between intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy. Analysis of differences in QOL and healthcare resource utilization between groups is ongoing. Disclosures Halpern: Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bayer Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Othus:Celgene: Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committee. Gardner:Abbvie: Speakers Bureau. Percival:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Nohla Therapeutics: Research Funding. Scott:Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Becker:AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glycomimetics, Invivoscribe, JW Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Trovagene: Research Funding; Accordant Health Services/Caremark: Consultancy; The France Foundation: Honoraria. Oehler:Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy. Walter:BioLineRx: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Argenx BVBA: Consultancy; BiVictriX: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Covagen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Race Oncology: Consultancy; Aptevo Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; New Link Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Cladribine is FDA-approved for Hairy Cell Leukemia. Here we describe its use for AML, where is is also widely used with prior publications supporting its use

Genetic and immunophenotypical diagnostics for acute myeloid leukemia and their implication on treatment strategy

2012 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. -
Author(s):  
Sabine Kayser ◽  
Richard F. Schlenk
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Treatment Strategy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Genetic ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Disease Classification ◽  
Novel Drugs ◽  
Genetic Abnormalities ◽  
Binding Factor ◽  
Acute Myeloid

AbstractCytogenetic and molecular genetic abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) play an important role in the pathogenesis, are absolutely necessary for disease classification, are the most important prognostic factors for induction success and survival, and are increasingly used for specific genotype-adapted treatment approaches. In particular, molecular-targeted treatment strategies are evolving within clinical trials in the AML entities core-binding factor AML, characterized by t(8;21) and inv(16)/t(16;16), and AML with mutated NPM1, as well as AML with an internal tandem duplication of the FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene. The link between the leukemogenic importance of genetic abnormalities and their role as a potential target for well-known and novel drugs will contribute to the stepwise replacement of purely risk-adapted therapy to a more and more genotype-adapted treatment strategy.

Sunitinib and Intensive Chemotherapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Activating FLT3 Mutations: Results of the AMLSG 10-07 Study (ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT00783653)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1483-1483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Fiedler ◽  
Sabine Kayser ◽  
Maxim Kebenko ◽  
Jürgen Krauter ◽  
Helmut R. Salih ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Flt3 Mutations ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 1483 Background: Activating FLT3 mutations including internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD) and tyrosine-kinase domain mutation (FLT3-TKD) occur in approximately one third of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and are particularly associated with a poor outcome in case of FLT3-ITD. Sunitinib is a multitargeted FLT3 inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced/metastatic renal cancer and metastatic/unresectable malignant GIST after failure of imatinib. Sunitinib has been evaluated in refractory AML as single agent treatment resulting in transient blast count reduction and in several cases of partial response in AML with activating FLT3 mutations. Aims: To evaluate the feasibility of a standard induction and consolidation therapy in combination with orally administered sunitinib in elderly AML patients with activating FLT3 mutations. Methods: Patients aged 60 years or higher with AML with activating FLT3 mutations (FLT3-ITD, FLT3-TKD) and fit enough for intensive chemotherapy were eligible. Induction therapy included cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per continuous infusion on days 1–7 and daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1–3 (DA). A second course was allowed in responding patients, who did not achieve a complete remission (CR). In patients achieving a CR after induction therapy three consolidation cycles were intended (cytarabine 1 g/m2 i.v. bid, on days 1,3,5). A 3+3 dose escalation/de-escalation scheme was used to define the dose and scheduling of sunitinib. The first cohort of three patients received oral sunitinib continuously starting from day 1 in a dose of 25 mg/day (level 1). Dose escalation to level 2 with sunitinib 37.5 mg/day continuously or dose de-escalation to level −1 with 25 mg day 1 to 7 had been defined in the protocol. After definition of the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) an extension of the cohort at that dose was intended. Results: A total of twenty-two patients were enrolled between January 2009 and March 2011. The median age was 70 years (range 60–78), 13 were female. The type of AML was de novo in 16 pts., s-AMLin one patient and t-AML in 4 pts. Fifteen patients had a FLT3-ITD (68%) and 7 a FLT3-TKD (32%) mutation. A NPM1 mutation was present in 11 patients (50%), 15 patients exhibited a normal karyotype, 3 an intermediate-2 risk karyotype according to ELN guidelines and 2 a complex karyotype and 2 had no evaluable metaphases. In the first cohort 5 patients were treated and two experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), i) prolonged hematological recovery beyond day 35 in a patient achieving a CR and ii) a hand-foot-syndrome grade III. Four of the 5 patients achieved a CR. According to the protocol the following patients received treatment at dose level −1 with sunitinib 25mg days 1 to 7. In this cohort only one DLT occurred, again prolonged hematological recovery. Thus the MTD was defined at dose level −1. Response to induction therapy in all patients was CR in 13 pts. (59%), partial remission in 1 pt. (4.5%), refractory disease in 5 pts. (23%), death in 3 pts. (13.5%). CR rate in AML with FLT3-ITD was 53% (8/15) and 71% (5/7) in those with FLT3-TKD. All 13 patients achieving CR received repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy and 7 proceeded to single agent sunitinib maintenance therapy (median 11 months, range 1–24 months). In these patients relapse occurred in 10, one patient died due to severe colitis during consolidation therapy and two patients are in sustained CR. Two patients not achieving a CR after induction therapy underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation form matched unrelated donors. Twelve of the 22 patients died leading to a median survival of 18.8 months and a 2 year survival of 36% (95%-CI, 19–70%). Median relapse-free survival was 11 months. Conclusion: Combination of intensive induction and consolidation therapy with oral sunitinib in AML with activating FLT3 mutations is feasible with 25 mg sunitinib given during intensive therapy on days 1 to 7 and continuously during maintenance. Disclosures: Fiedler: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Complete Remission after 5-Azacitidine and Venetoclax: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3962-3962
Author(s):  
Oren Pasvolsky ◽  
Shai Shimony ◽  
Ron Ram ◽  
Avichai Shimoni ◽  
Liat Shargian-Alon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Intensive Group ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract The therapeutic landscape for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has evolved in recent years with the introduction of hypomethylating agents (HMA) and venetoclax in patients previously deemed unfit for curative - intent treatment. Some of these patients undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT), yet there are scarce data regarding transplantation outcomes. We conducted a multicenter nationwide retrospective cohort study to evaluate outcomes of patients with AML who underwent alloHCT in first CR (CR1) after frontline treatment with 5-azacitidine plus venetoclax (aza-ven group). In addition, we collected a historical control group of patients who achieved CR1 following first line intensive chemotherapy followed by alloHCT (intensive group). 24 patients in the aza-ven group were transplanted between 2019 and 2021. Compared to the intensive group, patients in the aza-ven group were older (median age 71.7 vs. 58.4 years, p &lt;0.001), had higher incidence of therapy related AML and AML with antecedent hematologic disorder (p &lt;0.001) and had more often adverse cytogenetics (p=0.022). They had a higher percentage of allografts from matched unrelated donors, and reduced intensity conditioning was more commonly used (Table 1). Median follow up was 8 (range, 0 to 25) months in the aza-ven group and 23 (range, 4 to 56) months in the intensive group. Estimated 12 months non relapse mortality was 19.1% in the aza-ven group and 11.8% in the intensive group (p=0.492). The estimated median relapse free survival (RFS) was not reached in the aza-ven group and was 19.3 months (CI 95% 1-38) in the intensive group. There was no difference between the two groups in 12 months RFS (58% and 54% in the aza-ven group and intensive group, respectively, p = 0.892). The estimated median survival of the aza-ven group was not reached and the 12 months overall survival (OS) rate was 63.2%. The estimated median survival of the intensive group was 50 months (CI 95% 5 - 96) and the 12 months OS rate was 70.8%. There was no statistical differences between the two groups regarding OS (p = 0.58). In a subgroup Cox regression analysis of the aza-ven group, adverse ELN 2017 risk category and HCT-CI score ≥3 were predictive of decreased RFS, both in univariate analysis (UVA) and in multivariate analysis (MVA) (HR 10.56, CI 95%1.64-68.1, p=0.013 and HR 6.43, CR 95% 1.34-30.75, p=0,02, respectively). Graft source (alternative vs. matched donor) and HCT-CI score ≥3 were predictive of decreased OS in UVA (HR 19.45, CI 95% 1.66-228.13, p= 0.018 and HR 5.93, CI 95% 1.13-31.05, p=0.03], yet in MVA neither of these factors retained their predictive value. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 6 months was similar between groups: 58% in the aza-ven group vs. 62% in the intensive group (p=0.39). Likewise, there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 12 months: 40% vs 42%, respectively (p=0.747) In conclusion, our data suggests that alloHCT for AML patients achieving first CR with aza-ven appears feasible, with short term post-transplant outcomes comparable to those expected after traditional intensive chemotherapy. Our results were collected in the real world setting, and patients in the aza-ven group were older and had inherently worse leukemia characteristics, including more secondary AML and more adverse cytogenetic features. Future research is warranted to decipher the true spectrum of AML patients who could benefit from remission induction with this less intensive regimen prior to alloHCT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ram: Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Wolach: Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Neopharm: Consultancy. Yeshurun: Astellas: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy.

Differences in Cyto- and Molecular Genetic Abnormalities between Children <2 Years and Older Children with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1830-1830
Author(s):  
Brian V. Balgobind ◽  
Iris H. Hollink ◽  
Dirk Reinhardt ◽  
Jutta Bradtke ◽  
Andrea Teigler-Schlegel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Genetic ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Normal Karyotype ◽  
Older Children ◽  
Ras Mutations ◽  
Genetic Abnormalities ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Young children (defined as &lt;2 years old) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) do not differ in outcome when compared with older children with AML. Previously, distinct cytogenetic aberrations specific for AML in young children have been reported, such as t(7;12), and t(1;22), which is found exclusively in FAB M7. Moreover, young children with AML are characterized by a high frequency of 11q23-rearrangements. However, so far, no information is available on differences in the molecular genetic background of these two age groups. We therefore retrospectively investigated the distribution of different cytogenetic and molecular aberrations in a large cohort (n=435) of pediatric AML cases, of which 75 (17%) were young children. The predominant cytogenetic aberration in infant AML consisted of 11q23-rearrangements, which occurred in 44% of young children versus 17% in older children (p=&lt;0.005), without differences in the distribution of 11q23-translocation partners. We also found significant differences in other cytogenetic subgroups of AML between young and older children, i.e. normal karyotype, 5% vs. 18%, respectively (p=0.008) and complex karyotype, 12% vs. 5% (p=0.03). t(7;12) (n=3) and t(8;16) (n=3) were only detected in young children, in contrast to t(15;17) (n=16) and t(8;21) (n=44), which were only seen in older children. Patients were also screened for molecular abnormalities, including the mutational hotspots of c-KIT (n=229), FLT3 (n=230), N-RAS (n=187), K-RAS (n=187), PTPN11 (n=216), MLL-partial tandem duplications (MLL-PTD) (n=240) and NPM1 (n=291). In the overall cohort, a significantly different age distribution was found for NPM1 mutations (0% young vs. 9% in older children; p=0.05) and FLT3-ITD (0% vs. 21%, respectively; p=0.005). Mutations in the other genes showed no clear correlation with age. Several non-random associations between molecular and cytogenetic abnormalities were detected. 89% of c-KIT mutations were associated with core-binding factor AML in children ≥2 years old. In young children, 2/4 c-KIT-mutated cases were associated with an MLL-rearrangement. NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutations in older children were significantly correlated with normal karyotype AML (57% of NPM1 mutations, and 75% of FLT3/ITD; p=&lt;0.005). In young children, 71% of RAS mutations were associated with an 11q23-rearrangement vs. 28% in older children (p=0.08). In older children however, 41% of the RAS mutations were associated with a normal karyotype. These data suggest that young children with AML are characterized by differences in the type and frequency of cytogenetic and molecular genetic abnormalities when compared with older children with AML, possibly reflecting differences in underlying biology between these age-groups. These differences may become clinically relevant in the era of molecularly targeted therapy.

scholarly journals Tumor Lysis Syndrome Risk in Outpatient Versus Inpatient Administration of Venetoclax and Hypomethlators for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 6-7
Author(s):  
Aryeh Pelcovits ◽  
Brianna Bakow ◽  
Jozal Waroich ◽  
Pamela C Egan ◽  
Rabin Niroula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Uric Acid ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Tumor Lysis ◽  
Wbc Count ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Introduction Venetoclax (VEN), a BCL-2 inhibitor, along with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) has become standard therapy for older patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) not fit for intensive frontline therapy based on recent Phase 3 data reporting a median overall survival (OS) of 14.7 months. Initially used in CLL, VEN is associated with fatal episodes of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). Package insert and expert opinion recommendations are for its initiation in the inpatient setting, with a dose escalation of 100mg day 1, 200mg day 2, and 400mg day 3 with IV hydration and close monitoring of TLS markers. In the initial phase 1b trial that resulted in its approval for use in pts with AML all pts were admitted to the hospital for initial venetoclax ramp up and received at least 72 hours of prior TLS prophylaxis, as well as initiation of venetoclax only if the white blood cell count was less than 25,000. No episodes of TLS were documented. Herein, we evaluated the safety of outpatient VEN ramp up when given in addition to HMAs for the treatment of AML. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of pts diagnosed with AML at our institution from 12/1/2016 until 7/1/2020. We identified pts who received HMAs and VEN, either as up-front treatment for newly diagnosed AML or as salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory disease, and stratified pts based on whether venetoclax was initiated in the inpatient or outpatient setting. We then examined baseline AML characteristics including initial blast count, cytogenetics and molecular profiles as well as baseline TLS markers prior to the initiation of VEN. Finally, using the Cairo-Bishop Criteria we examined the number of episodes of laboratory or clinical tumor lysis in all pts. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were performed to examine differences in categorical and continuous variables. Results Between 12/1/2016 and 7/1/2020 43 pts at received VEN in addition to an HMA for the treatment of AML (Table 1). 39 pts (91%) had VEN initiation and ramp up in the outpatient setting. Amongst all pts 24 received azacitadine, 11 decitabine, and 8 received both HMAs at some point during therapy. Twenty-two pts received HMA and VEN as frontline treatment while the other 21 received it as salvage therapy. There were 28 pts who received venetoclax within 28 days of starting the HMA, 25 of whom received it as an outpatient and 3 as an inpatient. Pretreatment labs were notable for median normal values of potassium, phosphate, uric acid, calcium and creatinine (Table 1). The median pretreatment creatinine levels between the two groups were not significantly different. Median pre-treatment WBC count was noted to be significantly higher in the inpatient cohort (37.9 vs 5.5, p-value of 0.01). Cytogenetic and molecular characteristics are included in the table with the only significant difference being a larger percentage of DNMT3A mutation in the inpatient group. While identification of TLS was somewhat limited by incomplete data on all pts, there was only one identified episode of laboratory TLS (2.5%) with an elevated phosphate and uric acid. This occurred in the outpatient group in a patient whose pretreatment WBC count was greater than 25,000. This pt required admission to the hospital for rasburicase and IV fluids with resolution of the laboratory effects without resultant clinical TLS. There were no episodes of clinical TLS in either group. 30-day mortality from starting VEN was 0% in both groups. While the Cairo-Bishop Criteria require the presence of 2 lab abnormalities to diagnose TLS we did a further analysis to evaluate for the presence of even a single lab abnormality associated with TLS. We identified 3 additional pts (7.5%) in the outpatient cohort who had the presence of only one lab abnormality associated with TLS within the 7 days after initiating treatment. None of these pts required any further TLS directed treatment or hospitalization. Conclusion Our experience with HMAs and VEN showed that outpatient ramp up of venetoclax is safe with a very low risk of laboratory TLS (2.5%) and no evidence of clinical TLS within our cohort. Even with an expanded definition of TLS we only identified 3 additional pts who developed laboratory abnormalities associated with TLS. Our results suggest that, in addition to HMA, VEN ramp up can be safely delivered with monitoring to pts with a WBC count less than 25,000 in the outpatient setting. Disclosures Olszewski: Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase II Pilot Clinical Trial of Pazopanib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or at Initial Diagnosis When No Intensive Treatment Is Possible

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5176-5176
Author(s):  
Torsten Kessler ◽  
Steffen Koschmieder ◽  
Christoph Schliemann ◽  
Martina Crysandt ◽  
Jan-Henrik Mikesch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Intensive Therapy ◽  
Initial Diagnosis ◽  
Intensive Treatment ◽  
Response Criteria ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Patients with AML who are not eligible for intensive therapy or stem cell transplantation have a dismal prognosis. Autocrine and paracrine secretion of angiogenic and hematopoietic growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor in the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment may promote proliferation and survival of leukemic blasts. The oral multikinase inhibitor pazopanib was reported to exert growth inhibitory and proapoptotic effects in myeloid cells. Methods: This phase II study evaluated pazopanib (800 mg orally once daily) in patients with relapsed or refractory AML or at initial diagnosis when no intensive treatment is possible. All patients who received pazopanib for 14 days or longer were included into the analysis of safety, tolerability and efficacy. Response criteria are defined according to the Revised Recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Co-primary endpoints were cumulative response rate (CR, CRp, CRi, PR) within up to one year and reduction of BM microvessel density (MVD) on day 28. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS, time from first dose until progression or death from any cause) were measured from the first day of treatment until death of any cause or progression of disease. Results: Between February 2012 and September 2015, 20 AML patients with a median (range) age of 76 (52 - 86) years were treated with pazopanib. The majority of patients (n = 15, 75%) had relapsed (n = 7) or refractory (n = 8) AML, five patients (25%) were enrolled with newly diagnosed AML. Median (range) ECOG performance status was 1 (1 - 3). According to ELN 2010 criteria, four patients (20%) had adverse risk, 15 (75%) had intermediate risk, and one patient (5%) had favorable cytogenetic/molecular risk. Overall, the safety profile of pazopanib was similar to that reported in previous studies. The most common AEs of any grade, related to pazopanib as assessed by the investigator, were gastrointestinal AEs, including nausea (n = 8), diarrhea (n = 6), inappetence (n = 5) and vomiting (n = 3). Two out of 20 treated patients (10%) had a partial remission (reduction of blast count > 50%) and 14 (70%) a stable disease (SD) while on pazopanib. Four patients (20%) experienced initial PD. Median PFS was 65 days (95% CI 29 - 105). After the end of study period three remarkable responses occurred on subsequent therapies such as demethylating agents resulting in one CRi and one CRp and one CR after secondary BM transplantation. All these patients had SD while on pazopanib and improved general condition allowing escalation of therapy. However, at the time of OS evaluation all patients had died due to PD and/or infections. Median OS of the treated study cohort was 191 days (95% CI 87 - 435), and 1-year survival altogether was 35%. There was no significant change in BM MVD between day 1 and day 28. Conclusion: Pazopanib was found to be safe in patients with AML not eligible for intensive therapy. The survival data are encouraging but clearly necessitate a controlled randomized clinical trial for confirmation. Clinical trial information: NCT01361334. Disclosures Stelljes: Amgen: Honoraria; JAZZ: Honoraria; MSD: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Lenz:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corp.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Brümmendorf:Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy.

scholarly journals CDK4/6 Inhibitor Palbociclib for Treatment of KMT2A-Rearranged Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Interim Analysis of the AMLSG 23-14 Trial

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1608-1608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Fröhling ◽  
Mridul Agrawal ◽  
Nikolaus Jahn ◽  
Lars R. Fransecky ◽  
Claudia D. Baldus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Blood Cell ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Who Classification ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Distinct Entity ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Approximately 5% of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases are associated with balanced translocations of chromosome 11q23, and AML with t(9;11)(p22;q23) is recognized as a distinct entity by the WHO Classification. Similarly, the presence of t(4;11)(q21;q23), which accounts for 8-10% of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in patients over the age of 20 years, defines a distinct entity termed "B-lymphoblastic leukemia with t(v;11q23)" according to the WHO Classification. On the molecular level, t(11q23) result in fusion of the KMT2A (also called MLL) gene, which encodes a histone 3 lysine 4 methyltransferase, to a broad spectrum of more than 70 partner genes. The prognosis of patients with relapsed/refractory KMT2A-rearranged leukemia is very poor, and new treatment approaches are needed. Using in vitro and in vivo experimental models, we previously identified cyclin dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) as a potential therapeutic target in KMT2A-rearranged leukemias (Placke et al. Blood. 2014;124:13-23). Aims: To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of the small-molecule CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in KMT2A-rearranged AML and ALL within a genotype-guided clinical trial (AMLSG 23-14; ClinicalTrials gov. Identifier NCT02310243). Methods: Patients with KMT2A-rearranged leukemia, either relapsed/refractory or newly diagnosed but ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, are enrolled. The study is a phase Ib/IIa trial with a safety/tolerability part in the phase Ib using the standard palbociclib dose of 125 mg once daily for 21 days in a 28-day cycle. Based on a 3+3 modified Fibonacci design, a dose deescalation to 100 mg and 75 mg in case of toxicity is possible in sequential cohorts. If no or only one limiting toxicity is observed among 6 patients at one dose level, this dose level will be taken forward to the phase IIa expansion part of the study. Limiting toxicities are defined as toxicities attributable to palbociclib, expected or unexpected. The expansion part of the study is based on Simon's optimal 2-stage design with 18 patients and 43 patients in the 2 stages. Results: The phase Ib of the study has been completed with recruitment of 6 patients with relapsed/refractory leukemia (AML, n=3; treatment-related AML, n=2; ALL, n=1; refractory to intensive chemotherapy, n=2; relapse, n=4 [following allogeneic stem cell transplantation, n=3; following chemotherapy, n=1]). Cytogenetic results were as follows: t(9;11), n=3; t(6;11), n=1; t(11;19), n=1; t(4;11), n=1. The median white blood cell count (WBC) at study inclusion was 7.05 G/l (range, 0.9-61.0). To control hyperleukocytosis, 3 patients were treated with hydroxyurea during the first week of palbociclib and one patient with corticosteroids. No limiting toxicity occurred during the first 28-day cycle, the limiting-toxicity assessment period. White blood cell counts rapidly decreased after one week of palbociclib at a dose of 125 mg/day and remained low until week 3 (median, 1.6 G/l; range, 0.6-1.9). The median WBC after one week of drug holiday was 1.9 G/l (range, 1.3-7.3). Response assessment revealed one partial remission, 3 disease stabilizations, and 2 cases of progressive disease. Four patients completed further treatment cycles (median, 2; range 2-6), with one patient achieving a complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery after cycle 2. This patient, a 76-year-old man with t(11;19)-positive de novo AML refractory to chemotherapy with daunorubicin and cytarabine, relapsed after cycle 6, and correlative laboratory studies are underway to determine potential resistance mechanisms. Conclusions: Palbociclib is well tolerated in patients with refractory/relapsed KMT2A-rearranged leukemia with no occurrence of limiting toxicities and has clinical activity in this prognostically unfavorable subset of AML/ALL. Therefore, the study will be taken forward to the efficacy part with accrual of further patients. In addition, the protocol is currently amended as a basket trial with inclusion of patients with locally advanced/metastatic chordoma based on preclinical evidence that CDK4/6 dependence represents a specific liability of chordoma cells that could be exploited for therapeutic benefit. Disclosures Lübbert: Celgene: Other: Travel Funding; Ratiopharm: Other: Study drug valproic acid; Janssen-Cilag: Other: Travel Funding, Research Funding. Schlenk:Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Dactinomycin in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with NPM1 Mutations

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3900-3900
Author(s):  
Guillaume Beziat ◽  
Suzanne Tavitian ◽  
Sarah Bertoli ◽  
Francoise Huguet ◽  
Laetitia Largeaud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mutational Event ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Nucleolar Stress ◽  
Acute Myeloid

NPM1 mutations are frequent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and define a distinct entity according to the 2016 WHO classification. NPM1 mutations are generally associated with chemosensitivity and a favorable prognosis. However, outcome may vary according to co-mutational events, and still approximately 40% of patients relapse after achieving complete response. Wild-type NPM1 is mainly located in the nucleolus where it plays a key role in the regulation of ribosome biogenesis, protein synthesis and tumor suppression through TP53 activation. Mutated NPM1 loses its predominant nucleolar location and accumulates in cytoplasm contributing to leukemogenesis (Falini B, Blood 2011). Moreover, this mutational event leads to haploinsufficiency and cytoplasmic retention of wild type NPM1 creating a vulnerability to nucleolar stress. Indeed, complete responses have been observed in NPM1-mutated AML patients with dactinomycin, a nucleolar stress-inducing drug (Falini B, NEJM 2015). Here, we report our experience of off-label dactinomycin in untreated or relapsed/ refractory NPM1-mutated AML. Inclusion criteria for this retrospective study were: age ≥ 18 years-old, AML with NPM1 mutation, relapsed or refractory disease as well as treatment-naive patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Patients should also have completed one cycle of dactinomycin 12.5 µg/kg/day for 5 days every 28 days. From September 2015 to February 2019, 26 patients received dactinomycin. Median age was 62.5y, WBC count was > 50 giga/L in 8 patients (31%), 13 patients (50%) had FLT3-ITD mutation whereas 10 (38%) and 11 (42%) patients were classified as favorable or intermediate-I according to the ELN-2010 classification. There were 7 (27%) relapses post-allogeneic transplantation. Median number of dactinomycin cycle was 1 (1-8) and 7 patients (27%) received more than 3 cycles. Sorafenib was added in 6 patients with associated FLT3-ITD mutations whereas 2 others patients received ATRA in combination with dactinomycin. Dactinomycin was administered in different situations: front-line treatment in 4 unfit patients (16%); morphologic (n=16, 62%) or molecular relapses (n=4, 16%) following intensive chemotherapy, refractory disease (n=1, 13%) or post remission therapy in second complete response (CR) following salvage chemotherapy (n=1, 13%). Three out of 17 patients (18%) in morphologic relapse or refractory to chemotherapy reached complete remission after the first cycle of dactinomycin. The duration of response was 4 and 6 months in 2 patients whereas the third patient is still in CR 3 years after dactinomycin. One out of 4 patients in molecular relapses achieved a complete molecular remission with dactinomycin. None of the 4 patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy responded to dactinomycin as front-line therapy. The only patient treated in post-CR2 with dactinomycin achieved a complete molecular remission before allogeneic transplantation. Overall, 5 patients (19%) appeared to benefit from dactinomycin treatment. Grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n=11, 42%), neutropenia (n=11, 42%), GI toxicity (n=6, 23%), mucositis (n=5, 19%), lung infection (n=5, 19%) and skin rash (n=2, 7.6%). Dactinomycin is an inexpensive and easily available drug that may induce significant responses in AML patients with NPM1 mutations with an acceptable safety profile. Prospective and controlled clinical trials are mandatory to clearly define the role of this agent in AML with NPM1 mutations. Disclosures Tavitian: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bertoli:Sanofi: Honoraria. Huguet:Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Bories:Abbvie: Consultancy. Recher:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: NPM1 mutations are frequent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and define a distinct entity according to the 2016 WHO classification. Wild-type NPM1 is mainly located in the nucleolus where it plays a key role in the regulation of ribosome biogenesis, protein synthesis and tumor suppression through TP53 activation. Mutated NPM1 loses its predominant nucleolar location and accumulates in cytoplasm contributing to leukemogenesis (Falini B, Blood 2011). Moreover, this mutational event leads to haploinsufficiency and cytoplasmic retention of wild type NPM1 creating a vulnerability to nucleolar stress. Indeed, complete responses have been observed in NPM1-mutated AML patients with dactinomycin, a nucleolar stress-inducing drug (Falini B, NEJM 2015).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document