Successful Use of Extracorporeal Life Support and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Induced by Tumor Lysis Syndrome in a Pediatric Patient With Lymphoma: A Case Report

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the treatment of cardiopulmonary failure in children with malignant tumors is controversial. There are few reports on the use of ECMO in the treatment of children with tumor lysis syndrome. This article reports a case of a 9-year-old girl who presented with hyperkalemia and cardiogenic shock. The discovery of an abdominal mass with critical ultrasound provided key evidence for the initial diagnosis of tumor lysis syndrome. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed for 1 h. Veno-arterial ECMO was installed at the bedside to provide cardiopulmonary support for the patient and was combined with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) to improve her internal environment. The patient was ultimately diagnosed with mature B-cell lymphoma with tumor lysis syndrome. A severe electrolyte disorder led to cardiogenic shock. After the electrolyte imbalance was corrected, the patient's heart function gradually improved, ECMO was successfully weaned, and chemotherapy was continued with the support of CRRT. One month after ECMO weaning, the organ function of the patient had recovered and there were no serious complications. In this case report, we paid attention to the rapid diagnosis of the etiology behind a patient's shock with critical ultrasound as well as the initiation and management of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), which provided us with valuable experience using VA-ECMO on critically ill children with tumors. It is also important evidence for the use of ECMO in the treatment of children with cardiopulmonary arrest secondary to malignancy.

Sézary syndrome preceded by mycosis fungoides and complicated by tumor lysis syndrome and macrophage activation syndrome

Sir, Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are the most common malignancies of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma [1]. Herein, we report a case of SS complicated by tumor lysis syndrome and macrophage activation syndrome. A 54-year-old patient, followed since October 2017 for mycosis fungoides and undergoing various treatments (PUVA therapy, methotrexate, chlorambucil + prednisone), presented with an aggravation of lesions toward extensive and intensely pruritic. A clinical examination revealed dry erythroderma, scratch marks, wart plaques, an accentuation of frontal wrinkles and nasolabial folds (leonine facies), palmoplantar fissuring keratoderma, xanthopachyonychia of all nails, and a carapace-like appearance of the scalp (Figs. 1 – 3). Generalized lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, and a state of anasarca-type edema caused by hypoalbuminemia were also found. A skin biopsy revealed lymphoproliferation of CD4+ T-cells and an aberrant loss of pan-T antigens. The CD4-to-CD8 ratio was at 48.5% and Sézary cells were 6960 (absolute value). A lymph node biopsy showed a dense infiltration of Sézary cells. A PET scan revealed hypermetabolism in the entire skin and at the lymph node level. Tumor lysis syndrome was evident, with high levels of blood uric acid (at 182 mg/L), elevated LDH (at 924 U/L), and functional kidney failure. Macrophage activation syndrome was also present, with fever, anemia and thrombocytopenia, liver cytolysis, hypertriglyceridemia, and hyperferritinemia. The patient received an albumin infusion, oral corticosteroid therapy to treat the syndrome, and rasburicase for hyperuremia. Despite this, the patient died before multiagent chemotherapy could have been started. On rare occasions, SS may be preceded by a prior history of classic MF. The International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) recommends that such cases be designated “SS preceded by MF” [2]. Traditionally, SS is defined as a leukemic form of CTCL associated with erythroderma. Sézary cells are a population of large lymphocytes in the peripheral blood, with grooved and lobulated nuclei, in the case of SS, numbering 1000 cells/mL or more [2]. The histopathologic findings in the skin often resemble those observed in MF, with less prominent epidermotropism. As in MF, immunohistochemical studies showing a CD4 predominance and loss of pan-T-cell markers may be helpful. Lymph node involvement is characterized by the complete effacement of the nodal architecture by the infiltrating Sézary cells (2). The poor prognostic factors in Sézary syndrome include an advanced stage of the disease, an older age at onset, and large cell transformation [3]. While high response rates may be achieved with systemic chemotherapy, they are frequently short-lived and associated with significant toxicities [2]. The management of SS is complicated and requires multidisciplinary collaboration between dermatologists, hematologists, biologists, and reanimators.

Tumor Lysis Syndrome following a Single Dose of Nivolumab for Relapsed Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is an oncologic emergency most frequently associated with initial treatment of hematologic malignancies and high-tumor burden solid tumors such as small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Most often, TLS is associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. In the treatment of SCLC, a paradigm shift has taken place in which immunotherapy is often added to chemotherapy for extensive-stage disease in the frontline setting or as monotherapy in the relapsed setting. Nivolumab is a programmed death 1 receptor blocking antibody previously FDA indicated for the treatment of metastatic SCLC with progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and at least one other line of therapy. Nivolumab, like all immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies, is associated with immune-mediated adverse reactions; however, there are few reported cases of nivolumab-induced TLS. We present a case of nivolumab-induced TLS following a single infusion. An 86-year-old female with a history of widely metastatic SCLC with metastasis to the liver, bone, and lymph nodes presented to the hospital following a fall due to weakness, dizziness, slurred speech, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain occurring 6 days after receiving her first nivolumab infusion. After extensive evaluation, the patient was diagnosed with TLS with hyperkalemia, acute renal failure, hyperphosphatemia, and hypocalcemia. She was treated aggressively with intravenous fluids, rasburicase, and sodium polystyrene sulfate (Kayexalate^®), which resulted in rapid improvement of her electrolytes and renal function. However, despite correction of electrolytes and overall symptomatic improvement, over the course of several days, the patient’s condition rapidly deteriorated with increasing dyspnea, lethargy, confusion, and eventually death. TLS following nivolumab is exceedingly rare. This report highlights the potential risk of development of TLS with checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Clinical Features and Cytoreduction Therapy in Children with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Hyperleukocytosis

Background Hyperleukocytosis is observed in 5% to 20% of patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is associated with an increased risk of early complications and mortality. While being used frequently in patients with AML and hyperleukocytosis, the clinical utility of leukapheresis has not been conclusive. Low-dose chemotherapy has also been used recently as a cytoreduction method in these patients, but the data are limited. Objectives: To describe and compare the clinical and laboratory characteristics, early adverse events, and outcomes of children with newly diagnosed AML and hyperleukocytosis according to cytoreductive methods; leukapheresis, low dose chemotherapy (cytarabine), or no intervention. Methods: We studied patients with newly diagnosed AML treated on three multi-institutional St. Jude protocols, AML97, AML02, and AML08, between 1997 and 2017. Hyperleukocytosis was defined as white blood cell (WBC) counts of 100 x 10 9/L or higher at diagnosis. The decision of cytoreductive treatment was made as the discretion of the treating physician. Leukoreduction was used in the AML97 and AML02 studies, and cytarabine (100mg/m 2/dose every 12 hours) was the first choice for AML08 study. We reviewed baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory data (complete blood cell counts [CBC], chemistries, coagulation) and adverse effects (grade 3 or higher on neurologic, renal, respiratory, and hemorrhagic complications based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) from diagnosis to day 14 of protocol-based chemotherapy. Cairo-Bishop criteria was used for laboratory/clinical tumor lysis syndrome. The time from the first CBC to administration of protocol-based chemotherapy was calculated. Results: A total of 49 patients were identified: 8 patients in AML97, 19 in AML02, and 22 in AML08) (Table). The age at diagnosis was 10.8 years with a median initial WBC count of 157.6 x 10 9/L; CNS (CNS 2, 3 or traumatic lumbar puncture with blasts) was seen in 29 (59.2%) cases. FAB M4 or M5 subtype was found in 30 patients (61.2%), 11q23 abnormalities in 15 (30.6%) and inv(16) in 8 (16.3%). In regards to leukoreduction method, 16 patients received leukapheresis (14 patients in AML97/02 and 2 in AML08), 18 cytarabine (all in AML08) and 1 hydroxyurea (in AML08); 14 did not receive leukoreduction (13 patients in AML97/02 and 1 in AML08). Leukapheresis was used more often in patients with higher diagnostic WBC counts (218.7 x 10 9/L) than those treated with cytarabine (152.9 x 10 9/L) or without intervention (127.3 x 10 9/L) (P<0.001). The decrease of WBC counts (%) before and after intervention was more pronounced among patients treated with cytarabine than those treated with leukapheresis (75% vs. 48.5%, P=0.03). When decreases in WBC counts were evaluated from the first CBC to the initiation of protocol therapy, cytarabine treatment was associated with more decreases in WBC counts from baseline (84.8%) than leukapheresis (46.7%) or no intervention (1.8%) (P<0.001). Patients who received cytarabine intervention had a longer median time from the first CBC to initiation of protocol therapy (95.2 hours) compared to those who received leukapheresis (28.1 hours) and no intervention (20.4 hours) (P<0.001). No early deaths were observed from the time of diagnosis to two weeks after initiation of protocol chemotherapy, and no statistically significant differences were noted in the incidences of neurologic, pulmonary, renal, hemorrhagic events, or laboratory/clinical tumor lysis syndrome among these three groups. Conclusion: Low-dose cytarabine treatment appears to be a safe and effective mean of cytoreduction for patients with AML and hyperleukocytosis. Further studies are needed to determine if this approach is preferable among patients treated with contemporary treatment. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pui: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Data Monitoring Committee.

Very Few Interventions after Tumor Lysis Monitoring in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Who Are Started on Venetoclax in the Real-World Setting- Suggests Less Intensive Monitoring Maybe Safe for Low-Risk Patients

Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is one of the most common lymphoid malignancies in adults. Venetoclax, an orally administered B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor, is a FDA approved therapy offering durable responses. Due to risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) upon venetoclax initiation, a strict dose escalation schedule with frequent laboratory monitoring is recommended in the package insert (PI). Real world data reflecting adherence to this schedule and frequency of interventions resulting from intense monitoring are not described. Methods: Retrospective review of the Levine Cancer Institute database identified 73 consecutive patients with CLL who were initiated on venetoclax between July 2017 and March 2021. This included those initiated at the central academic site and regional academic-hybrid community sites. In the first two weeks of venetoclax, ramp up dosing and TLS labs (creatinine, potassium, calcium, phosphorous and uric acid) were evaluated for compliance consistent with the PI. Compliance required labs to be performed pre-dose, and at 6-8 hours and 24 hours after the initial 20 mg and 50 mg doses on weeks 1 and 2. The consequent interventions within these first 2 weeks, based on TLS labs, were then recorded. Patients who strictly adhered to all these laboratory checks at the various timepoints were considered compliant. Those who missed even a single lab or time point were considered non-compliant. Tumor lysis was measured by standard criteria using the Cairo-Bishop definition. The following Interventions were recorded: rasburicase administration, renal replacement therapy, ED visits, unplanned hospitalizations, ICU admissions, unplanned administration of IV fluids, the use of calcium supplementation, phosphate binders, treatment for hyperkalemia, dose reduction or holding of venetoclax. Baseline patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were summarized and described; rates of compliance were compared between tumor burden categories using Fisher's Exact test. Results : Baseline characteristics of the 73 identified patients were: 64% male, 79% white and 19% black, median age at venetoclax initiation was 67 (44 - 84). There were 49% of patients in the low tumor burden category, 44% in the medium tumor burden category and 6% in the high tumor burden category. Compliance with TLS labs during the first 2 weeks was 66% overall (n=48), with compliance between the tumor burden categories being 75% in high, 66% in medium and 67% in low (P>0.99). Interventions occurred in 6 (8%) of the patients, with all interventions occurring in the medium or high tumor burden group. These interventions included administration of IV fluids (n=2), calcium supplementation (n=1), phosphate binders (n=2) and holding of venetoclax (n=1). None of these 6 patients requiring an intervention had clinical or laboratory TLS. None of the 73 patients required rasburicase administration, renal replacement therapy, ED visits, unplanned hospitalizations, or ICU admissions during this 2 week ramp up period. Of the 6 patients requiring interventions, 4 patients had TLS labs performed by the PI versus 2 patients who did not. Clinical and laboratory TLS in the PI-compliant group was recorded. None of these patients had clinical TLS and 1 patient met the criteria for laboratory criteria TLS based on a 25% change from baseline in phosphorus and uric acid, however, labs remained in normal range. There were no deaths during the venetoclax ramp up. Conclusion: Compliance with the strict TLS lab monitoring during venetoclax initiation is not universal, likely due to real world patient and institutional barriers. The intervention rates during the first 2 weeks were low, with no patients in the low tumor burden category requiring an intervention. These results suggest that a less strict laboratory monitoring schedule may be safe in patients with low tumor burden CLL. If the safety is confirmed prospectively, it would make the venetoclax initiation less cumbersome and result in increased access to venetoclax for patients with low burden CLL. Disclosures Hu: Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellectar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moyo: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Park: Teva: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; G1 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rafael Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding. Copelan: Amgen: Consultancy. Avalos: Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMJ Best Practice: Patents & Royalties: Royalties from a co-authored article on evaluation of neutropenia. Symanowski: Carsgen: Consultancy; Immatics: Consultancy, Other: DSMB Member; Eli Lilly: Consultancy, Other: DSMB Member. Jacobs: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; TeneoBio: Research Funding; SecuraBio: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; Jannsen: Speakers Bureau. Ghosh: Genmab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding.