Pattern of Use of Anticoagulation and/or Antiplatelet Agents in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Treated with Single-Agent Ibrutinib Therapy

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1990-1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Jones ◽  
Peter Hillmen ◽  
Steven Coutre ◽  
Constantine Tam ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Antiplatelet Agent ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib is a first-in-class, oral covalent inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) that has shown single-agent efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in patients (pts) with CLL. While BTK is expressed in platelets, bleeding diathesis has not been reported in pts with hereditary BTK deficiency (e.g., X-linked agammaglobulinemia). Pts with CLL often have comorbidities requiring anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet agents, which can increase bleeding risk. We sought to characterize the pattern of use of these agents and describe bleeding adverse events (AEs) observed in 2 trials of single-agent ibrutinib in pts with CLL. Methods: Event-based analysis of data from the ibrutinib phase 2 PCYC-1102 trial and interim analysis of the phase 3 RESONATETM(PCYC-1112 trial) of ibrutinib vs. ofatumumab were analyzed to determine the use of concomitant anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet therapy. Precautionary language on the use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents, particularly regarding restrictions on the use of vitamin K antagonists (e.g., warfarin), and recommendations for perioperative holding of ibrutinib, were added late during the 1102 trial. Major bleeding was defined as any grade ≥ 3 bleeding event, or hemorrhage of any grade resulting in one of the following: intraocular bleeding causing loss of vision, need for ≥ 2 units of RBC transfusion, hospitalization, prolonged hospitalization, or any intracranial hemorrhage. Results: In the 2 trials, 327 pts with CLL/SLL were treated; 132 in 1102 trial and 195 in the ibrutinib arm of 1112. Median age was 68 and 67 years, respectively, and median number of prior therapies was 3 in both trials. Overall, 65 pts (20%) received concomitant anticoagulation across the 2 trials, 70 (21%) received ASA, and 7 (2%) received clopidogrel (Table). The most common bleeding AEs were grade 1 petechiae and contusion. In the 1102 trial, grade 1 bleeding AEs occurred in 52%, grade 2 in 5%, and grade 3 in 3%. In the ibrutinib arm of 1112, grade 1 bleeding AEs occurred in 41%, grade 2 in 4%, and grade 3 in 1%. Overall, major bleeding occurred in 8 of 327 pts (2.4%): 5% in 1102 (6 of 132) and 1% in the ibrutinib arm of 1112 (2 of 195). For comparison, in the ofatumumab arm of 1112, major bleeding occurred in 1.6% of pts (3 of 191). Among the 8 ibrutinib-treated pts with major bleeding, 5 were reported to have concomitant use of either an anticoagulant alone (LMWH, n=1), an antiplatelet agent alone (ASA, n=1; NSAID, n=1), or both an anticoagulant and an antiplatelet agent (ASA and warfarin, n=1; NSAID, heparin and LMWH, n=1). The case of major bleeding on warfarin occurred on the 1102 trial before a protocol amendment restricted its use. Bleeding AEs led to discontinuation of ibrutinib in 4 pts (1.2%) from the 2 studies (3 on 1102 and 1 on 1112), all due to major bleeding. Conclusions: In summary, the concomitant use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent was common in 2 clinical trials of single-agent ibrutinib in 327 pts with CLL/SLL. Bleeding AEs in these trials were primarily grade 1 and associated with low rates of treatment discontinuation. Major bleeding events were uncommon and most cases occurred in pts taking one or more concomitant anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet agents. Importantly, there was no difference in the incidence of major bleeding between the 2 arms of the randomized 1112 trial while many of these pts were receiving concomitant anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents. Adherence to appropriate drug-withholding guidelines perioperatively and precautions surrounding the use of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, as applied in the 1112 trial, resulted in few major bleeding complications. Table. Concomitant anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents used in single-agent trials n (%) 1102 (n=132) 1112 ibrutinib arm(n=195) Total (N=327) Any anticoagulant 23 (17) 42 (22) 65 (20) Vitamin K antagonist* Heparin LMWH Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Alteplase 6 (5) 3 (2) 14 (11) 0 0 0 1 (1) 4 (2) 5 (3) 34 (17) 3 (2) 1 (1) 1 (1) 0 10 (3) 8 (2) 48 (15) 3 (1) 1 (<1) 1 (<1) 1 (<1) Any antiplatelet 67 (51) 73 (37) 140 (43) ASA Clopidogrel NSAIDs Dipyridamole/ASA 33 (25) 0 46 (35) 1 (1) 37 (19) 7 (4) 45 (23) 1 (1) 70 (21) 7 (2) 91 (28) 2 (1) *Included warfarin (n=8), acenocoumarol (n=1) and fluindione (n=1). Disclosures Jones: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hillmen:Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Gilead, Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Coutre:Janssen, Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tam:Pharmacyclics and Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Furman:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Barr:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Kipps:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Flinn:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Jaeger:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Burger:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Cheng:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Lee:Pharmacyclics: Employment. James:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Byrd:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. O'Brien:Amgen, Celgene, GSK: Consultancy; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent, Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Pharmacyclics, Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Major Bleeding Complications Among Patients Treated with Ibrutinib and Concomitant Antiplatelet, Anticoagulant, or Supplemental Therapy

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4387-4387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Pavlik ◽  
Hallie Barr ◽  
Emily Dotson ◽  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Kristie A. Blum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Major Bleeding Events

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib, an orally bioavailable small molecular inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), is an approved therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and Waldenstrӧm's macroglobulinemia (WM). Beyond B lymphocytes, BTK signaling is important for collagen-mediated platelet activation, and BTK inhibition has been associated with primary hemostatic bleeding events (Levade et al Blood 2014). Although serious bleeding events have been uncommon (1-5%) in clinical trial populations, there is limited data describing the potential for increased serious bleeding incidence when ibrutinib is co-administered with other agents affecting the clotting cascade or platelet function. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of major bleeding in patients receiving ibrutinib concomitantly with antiplatelet agents (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, ADP inhibitors), anticoagulants (heparins, warfarin, novel oral anticoagulants), or supplements with potential anticoagulant activity (vitamin E and fish oil). Major bleeding events were identified using criteria developed by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (Schulman et al J Thromb Haemost 2005). Patients 18-89 years of age and treated with ibrutinib for CLL, MCL, or WM between March 1, 2010 and March 1, 2015 were included. The primary endpoint of this study was the incidence of major bleeding events, but we also sought to identify risk factors associated with the development of major bleeding, focusing on potential drug interactions. Based on the historic prevalence of major bleeding in ibrutinib clinical studies, we calculated that at least 20 major bleeding events would need to be identified in order to perform blinded multinomial regression on the collected data of an estimated 400 patients. Results: 437 eligible patients were included in the analysis. Patients were overwhelmingly male (71.4%) and white (94.8%), with a mean age of 67.1 years (range: 29-89). 53.1% received ibrutinib as participants of a clinical trial, and the remainder received standard-of-care ibrutinib treatment. The table (upper panel) summarizes use of concomitant antihemostatic agents by presence or absence of major bleeding events. Characteristics of the major bleeding events are further detailed in the lower panel. The most commonly observed concomitant antihemostatic medication was aspirin, with 147 patients (33.6%) being exposed to aspirin within the study period. Fourteen instances of major bleeding were observed, corresponding to an overall incidence of 3.2%. These major bleeding events all occurred in CLL patients receiving ibrutinib at the standard dose of 420 mg daily. Two patients had platelet counts less than 50 k/µL at time of the bleeding event. One-half of the major bleeding events were observed in the absence of an antihemostatic medication, and 2 of the observed major bleeding events resulted in death (1 received concomitant warfarin). Fourteen patients (3.3%) in the group without major bleeding were on anticoagulation, 4 being warfarin. The most common sites of major bleeding were gastrointestinal (50%), intracranial (14.3%) and thoracic (14.3%). While most patients developing major bleeding permanently discontinued ibrutinib (57.1%), approximately one third of the patients who developed major bleeding subsequently resumed ibrutinib following resolution of the bleeding event. Subsequently, these patients did not experience a recurrent major bleeding event. The rate of major bleeding did not meet power to detect statistical differences in bleeding events when comparing concomitant therapy, Conclusions: Our observed incidence of major bleeding is consistent with previous controlled clinical trials, suggesting similar safety profile when ibrutinib is used outside of a controlled setting. Major bleeding events were uncommon despite the frequent co-administration of antiplatelet agents. However, because we modified practice early to avoid therapeutic anticoagulation during ibrutinib therapy whenever possible, the number of patients receiving such drugs in combination was small and precludes inferences regarding safety. Table Table. Disclosures Blum: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Awan:Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis Oncology: Consultancy. Woyach:Acerta: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding. Christian:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Jones:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

An Open-Label Phase 2 Study Of Ofatumumab In Combination With a Novel AKT Inhibitor (Afuresertib) In Previously Treated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4175-4175
Author(s):  
Christine I. Chen ◽  
Susi Snitzler ◽  
Trina Wang ◽  
Harminder Paul ◽  
Lisa W Le ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Akt Inhibitor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Ofatumumab is a novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody which led to impressive single-agent responses of 47-58% in a phase 2 study of CLL patients (pts) with refractory disease (Wierda et al 2010). Unfortunately, response durations were short (median 5.6-7.1 mos). In order to improve upon these results, we combined ofatumumab with a novel pan-AKT kinase inhibitor, afuresertib (GSK2110183). The AKT pathway plays a centralized role in tumor differentiation, migration, proliferation and survival and is frequently aberrantly activated in CLL (Longo et al 2007). Single agent afuresertib is very well-tolerated with minimal myelotoxicity in relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies (Spencer et al ASH 2011). We present an interim analysis of the initial 19 of 31 planned pts in an ongoing trial of ofatumumab and afuresertib in relapsed/refractory CLL. Methods Previously treated CLL pts who have received at least one prior fludarabine-containing regimen with disease progression are eligible. During the initial 6 month Treatment Phase, ofatumumab 2000mg IV is administered weekly for 8 doses, then once every 4 week cycle for 4 doses (dose/schedule identical to the pivotal phase 2 trial) with afuresertib 125mg orally daily. An initial 10 day Lead-in Phase with afuresertib alone allows for evaluation of pharmacodynamic (PD) changes in phosphoproteins and pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. Pts are assessed for safety and response on day 1 of each cycle. Pts achieving SD, PR or CR by the end of the Treatment Phase proceed to the Maintenance Phase with single-agent afuresertib for a maximum of 12 mos (12 cycles). Results Demographics: To date, 19 pts have been enrolled. Median age is 65 yrs (range 43-76), baseline median Hb 108g/L (range 80-145), absolute lymphocytes 29.7 x109/L (range 1.0-464.9), β2M 4.42mg/L (range 1.42-3.21), bulky nodes ≥5cm in 5 pts (32%), organomegaly in 8 pts (42%), del17p/del11q on FISH in 9 pts (47%), and ZAP70+ in 13 pts (68%). Eight pts (42%) were fludarabine-refractory; only 2 pts had received prior alemtuzumab. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-6). Toxicity: Hematologic: 4 pts (21%) developed Gr 3-4 neutropenia during at least 1 cycle; 1 pt (5%) had a febrile neutropenia event. Only 2 pts (10.5%) have developed Gr 3-4 thrombocytopenia, without bleeding. Nonhematologic toxicity: Most common related grade 3-4 toxicities were GI: dyspepsia (53%), diarrhea (37%), nausea (21%), temporally related to oral afuresertib and easily managed symptomatically. Infusion reactions to ofatumumab were frequent (12 pts; 63%) with grade 3 reactions in 3 pts. Five pts (26%) developed non-infectious pneumonitis, with 3 pts requiring hospitalization. Two pts with preexisting atrial arrhythmias sustained exacerbation with weekly ofatumumab infusions. Most infections were mild, with only 1 grade 3 cellulitis. Efficacy: Of the 19 response-evaluable pts receiving a median of 6 cycles (range 1-9), 8 pts (42%) have achieved a PR, 11 SD (58%), and no CR. Response onset was rapid at a median 0.9 mos (range 0.8-2.8). At a median follow-up of 6.8 mos (range 0.3-12.9 mos), 5 pts (26%) have progressed and one patient has died after cycle 1 on therapy due to progressive CLL. PD Studies: CD19+ cells are assayed for phosphorylated AKT and its downstream targets RAS40 and GSK3 in addition to phospho-proteins of alternative pathways including ERK and pS6 by multiplexed phospho-flow cytometry. Peripheral blood samples are collected at screening and on cycle 1 day 10, after dosing with afuresertib. Of the 7 patients evaluated thus far, 5 demonstrated constitutive AKT phosphorylation at baseline. Partial inhibition of AKT signaling evidenced by increased phosphorylation of AKT and inhibition of GSK3 and/or RAS40 phosphorylation in response to BCR stimulation was observed post-treatment, indicating target engagement by afuresertib. PK Studies: Afuresertib exposure (Cmax and AUC) was similar when afuresertib was administered alone or in combination with ofatumumab. Conclusion Preliminary results from this phase 2 study suggests that a combination of ofatumumab plus a novel oral AKT inhibitor, afuresertib, has activity in previously treated CLL and is generally well-tolerated with minimal myelotoxicity. Response data are encouraging but whether durable responses can be achieved requires more mature follow-up. Disclosures: Chen: Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Off-label use of ofatumumab and afuresertib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL. Smith:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. Johnston:Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Phase IIa Study of Single-Agent MOR208 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1528-1528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽  
Gianluca Gaidano ◽  
Andre Goy ◽  
Mariano Provencio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cd20 Antibody ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: There remains a high unmet medical need for new therapies for patients with relapsed or refractory (R-R) B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). CD19 is a B-lymphocyte, lineage-specific surface antigen that is highly expressed by most B-cell NHLs. CD19 expression is maintained on lymphoma cells which have CD20 expression downregulated following treatment with the CD20 antibody, rituximab. Consequently, MOR208 (XmAb5574; MOR00208), an Fc-engineered, humanized, monoclonal antibody that targets CD19, may have clinical utility as a new therapeutic approach to R-R NHL. A phase I study showed MOR208 to be safe and well-tolerated with encouraging single-agent activity in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); an intravenous dose of 12 mg/kg was recommended for phase II studies. Methods: This is a non-randomized, open-label, multicenter, two-stage, phase IIa study of MOR208 in adult patients with R-R NHL whose disease had progressed after at least one prior therapy containing the CD20 antibody, rituximab. In stage 1, 10 patients were to be enrolled into each of four NHL subtype-specific cohorts: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), other indolent NHL (iNHL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients were to receive single-agent MOR208, 12 mg/kg intravenously, weekly, for 8 weeks (2 cycles). Those with at least stable disease by the 2007 International Response Criteria could continue MOR208 treatment for an additional 4 weeks (total of 12 weeks of therapy). Patients with a complete or partial response (CR or PR) after 12 weeks could then receive MOR208 as maintenance therapy, every 2 or 4 weeks depending on the investigator's decision, until progression. In stage 2, cohorts with ≥2 responses (CR or PR) were to be expanded by at least 20 additional patients. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints included duration of response, safety, immunogenicity of MOR208, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Results: The DLBCL and FL cohorts were expanded (to N=35 and N=34 patients, respectively), leading to a total enrollment of 92 patients: 56 (61%) were male; median age was 66.5 (range 35-90) years; 80 (87%) had stage III-IV disease; 41 (45%) had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy and 10 (11%) had received a prior stem-cell transplant. The investigator-assessed ORR across all NHL subtypes was 23% (21/92 patients; 16 not evaluable at cutoff) with clinical activity seen in the DLBCL (26% [9/35]; 2 CR, 7 PR); FL (26% [9/34]; 3 CR, 6 PR) and iNHL (27% [3/11]; 2 CR, 1 PR) cohorts (MCL, 0/12 responses). The iNHL cohort was not expanded as the response pattern in this subgroup was heterogeneous according to lymphoma subtype. The longest durations of response recorded to date are 15.4 months for FL and 14.2 months for DLBCL (both ongoing). Grade ≥3 non-hematologic and hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded in 24 (26%) and 14 (15%) of 92 patients, respectively. The most commonly reported grade ≥3 hematologic TEAEs were neutropenia (7 [8%] of 92 patients, anemia (4 [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (4 [4%]); such TEAEs were seen most frequently in the DLBCL cohort (10 [29%] of 35 patients overall; neutropenia, 5 [14%], anemia, 4 [11%], thrombocytopenia, 2 [6%]). Dyspnea was the most commonly reported grade ≥3 non-hematologic TEAE (4 [4%] of 92 patients). Infusion-related reactions were seen in 9 (10%) of 92 patients; all were grade 1-2, except for one case of dyspnea, grade 4. There were no treatment-related deaths. Clinical activity in patients with R-R DLBCL appeared to be dependent on attaining a defined cumulative exposure (AUC0-t) over 8 weeks of around 11,000 day*µg/mL; i.e., at the data cutoff date, all 8 patients with a PR after 2 cycles showed an exposure above this potential threshold level. Conclusions: MOR208 demonstrated encouraging single-agent activity with CRs observed in patients with R-R DLBCL, FL, and iNHL. MOR208 was well tolerated without significant infusional toxicity. These data support further development of MOR208 in combination with other agents (including lenalidomide and bendamustine), and protocols for studies in patients with R-R DLBCL are now being developed. Disclosures Jurczak: CELLTRION, Inc,: Research Funding. Zinzani:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; J&J: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gaidano:Celgene: Research Funding; MorphoSys; Roche; Novartis; GlaxoSmithKline; Amgen; Janssen; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Other: Advisory boards. Goy:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Allos, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Genentech, and Millennium. Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Robak:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys AG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Maddocks:Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Buske:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy. Korolkiewicz:MorphoSys AG: Employment. Striebel:MorphoSys AG: Employment. Blum:Morphosys: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Five-Year Experience with Single-Agent Ibrutinib in Patients with Previously Untreated and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 233-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. O'Brien ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Steven E. Coutre ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Jan Burger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib (ibr), a first-in-class, once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved by the US FDA for treatment of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) including pts with del17p. The phase 1b/2 PCYC-1102 trial showed single-agent efficacy and tolerability in treatment-naïve (TN; O'Brien, Lancet Oncol 2014) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL (Byrd, N Engl J Med 2013). We report efficacy and safety results of the longest follow-up to date for ibr-treated pts. Methods: Pts received 420 or 840 mg ibr QD until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Overall response rate (ORR) including partial response (PR) with lymphocytosis (PR-L) was assessed using updated iwCLL criteria. Responses were assessed by risk groups: unmutated IGVH, complex karyotype (CK; ≥3 unrelated chromosomal abnormalities by stimulated cytogenetics assessed by a reference lab), and in hierarchical order for del17p, then del11q. In the long-term extension study PCYC-1103, grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs requiring dose reduction or discontinuation were collected. Results: Median age of the 132 pts with CLL/SLL (31 TN, 101 R/R) was 68 y (range, 37-84) with 43% ≥70 y. Baseline CK was observed in 41/112 (37%) of pts. Among R/R pts, 34 (34%) had del17p, 35 (35%) del11q, and 79 (78%) unmutated IGVH. R/R pts had a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1-12). Median time on study was 46 m (range, 0-67) for all-treated pts, 60 m (range, 0-67.4) for TN pts, and 39 m (range, 0-67) for R/R pts. The ORR (per investigator) was 86% (complete response [CR], 14%) for all-treated pts (TN: 84% [CR, 29%], R/R: 86% [CR, 10%]). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) for TN and 52 m for R/R pts with 60 m estimated PFS rates of 92% and 43%, respectively (Figure 1). In R/R pts, median PFS was 55 m (95% confidence intervals [CI], 31-not estimable [NE]) for pts with del11q, 26 m (95% CI,18-37) for pts with del17p, and NR (95% CI, 40-NE) for pts without del17p, del11q, trisomy 12, or del13q. Median PFS was 33 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and NR for pts with and without CK, and 43 m (95% CI, 32-NE) and 63 m (95% CI, 7-NE) for pts with unmutated and mutated IGVH, respectively(Figure 2). Among R/R pts, median PFS was 63 m (95% CI, 37-NE) for pts with 1-2 prior regimens (n=27, 3 pts with 1 prior therapy) and 59 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and 39 m (95% CI, 26-NE) for pts with 3 and ≥4 prior regimens, respectively. Median duration of response was NR for TN pts and 45 m for R/R pts. Pts estimated to be alive at 60 m were: TN, 92%; all R/R, 57%; R/R del17p, 32%; R/R del 11q, 61%; R/R unmutated IGVH, 55%. Among all treated pts, onset of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs was highest in the first year and decreased during subsequent years. With about 5 years of follow-up, the most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were hypertension (26%), pneumonia (22%), neutropenia (17%), and atrial fibrillation (9%). Study treatment was discontinued due to AEs in 27 pts (20%) and disease progression in 34 pts (26%). Of all treated pts, 38% remain on ibr treatment on study including 65% of TN pts and 30% of R/R pts. Conclusions: Single-agent ibrutinib continues to show durable responses in pts with TN or R/R CLL/SLL including those with del17p, del11q, or unmutated IGVH. With extended treatment, CRs were observed in 29% of TN and 10% of R/R pts, having evolved over time. Ibrutinib provided better PFS outcomes if administered earlier in therapy than in the third-line or beyond. Those without CK experienced more favorable PFS and OS than those with CK. Ibrutinib was well tolerated with the onset of AEs decreasing over time, allowing for extended dosing for 65% of TN and 30% of R/R pts who continue treatment. Disclosures O'Brien: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Furman:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Coutre:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Flinn:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Burger:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Sharman:Gilead: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Wierda:Abbvie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Jones:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Luan:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. James:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Chu:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Primary Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer and Central Venous Catheter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2139-2139
Author(s):  
Allen Li ◽  
Willem Brandt ◽  
Cameron Brown ◽  
Tzu-Fei Wang ◽  
Rick Ikesaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of mortality in patients with cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and healthcare expenditure. The risk of VTE is also increased following the insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC) for chemotherapy deliverance and supportive care. The risks and benefits of primary thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer and newly inserted CVC are unclear. Objective We sought to assess the rates of VTE and major bleeding complications to determine the safety and efficacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in adult patients with cancer and a CVC. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and all EBM was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adult patients with cancer and a CVC receiving primary thromboprophylaxis or observation/placebo were included. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were total VTE and major bleeding episodes, respectively. Results A total of 9 RCTs (3155 patients) were included in the analysis. The total rates of VTE were significantly lower in patients receiving primary thromboprophylaxis compared to those not receiving primary prevention (7.6% vs. 13%; Odds Ratio (OR) 0.51, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.82, p &lt; 0.01, I² = 52%) (Figure 1). The rate of major bleeding complication was not increased in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis (0.9% vs. 0.7%; OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.29 to 4.40, p = 0.87, I² = 32%) (Figure 2). Conclusions Primary thromboprophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of VTE without increasing the risk of major bleeding complications in patients with cancer and CVC. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo Pharma: Research Funding. Ikesaka: LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wells: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria. Carrier: Servier: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aspen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Combined Ruxolitinib and Thalidomide in Patients with Myelofibrosis: Initial Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 354-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raajit K. Rampal ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Sean M Devlin ◽  
Eytan M. Stein ◽  
Tapan M. Kadia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Platelet Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Among the most frequent and challenging hematologic manifestations of myelofibrosis (MF) are anemia and thrombocytopenia, the presence of which portends an adverse outcome. Few effective modalities to address these cytopenias exist, particularly thrombocytopenia. Further, although the FDA-approved JAK1/2 inhibitor Ruxolitinib (RUX) has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in MF patients, RUX frequently results in anemia and thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia in particular often results in dose attenuation of RUX. Thalidomide (THAL) is a first-in-class immunomodulatory agent. Studies of THAL in MF patients, alone and with prednisone, have demonstrated improvements in anemia and thrombocytopenia. We therefore sought to examine whether combination of RUX and THAL could result in improvement in both disease-related and therapy-related cytopenias, as well as improve overall disease response in patients with MF. Here we report initial analysis of this study (NCT03069326). Methods: We conducted a multicenter two stage phase II trial designed to assess the effect of RUX and THAL combination in subjects with primary, post-polycythemia vera, or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Patients taking RUX at the time of enrollment must have had less than PR per IWG-MRT/ELN 2013 criteria, or be refractory, to RUX single-agent therapy. Patients must have been taking RUX for a minimum of 3 months, and must have been on a stable dose of RUX for a minimum of 4 weeks immediately prior to enrollment. Treatment-naïve patients received single-agent RUX for 3 months (run-in phase) per label, and went on to combination therapy if they achieved less then a PR per IWG-MRT/ELN criteria. Each cycle of therapy was 28 days. Response assessment was evaluated according to the IWG-MRT/ELN 2013 criteria. Platelet response criteria in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia (less than lower limit of normal) included: Major response (≥75% increase in platelet count), Intermediate Response (≥50% increase) and Minor Response (≥25% increase). Adverse events were assessed using the NCI CTCAE v. 4.0. The primary endpoint was the proportion of treated subjects that achieved a response by IWG-MRT criteria and by platelet response criteria. Results: A total of 25 patients are planned to be accrued. At the time of this writing, a total of 18 patients have been accrued. The median age was 70.5 years (47-85). 8 patients had received prior therapies other than RUX, including imetelstat, momelotinib, danazol, pomalidomide, darbepoetin alpha and sotatercept. 7 patients enrolled to the run-in phase. 14 patients received red blood cell transfusions prior to study enrollment. Evaluation of platelet count in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia demonstrated a significant increase in platelet count at cycle 3 of therapy compared to baseline (Figure 1A and B; P<0.05). An increase in Hgb was observed over successive cycles of combination therapy (Figure 1C and D). 5 of 18 accrued patients completed ≥6 cycles of combined therapy at the time of abstract submission and were thus evaluable for response assessment. The overall response rate in these patients was 80% (4/5 patients). Clinical Improvement (Anemia response and Symptom response) occurred in 3 patients (both responses observed in all 3 patients). Major platelet response was observed in 4 of 5 patients with baseline thrombocytopenia. 1 patient met criteria for spleen response (Table 1). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events regardless of attribution included; limb edema, diverticulitis, hypertension, syncope. 1 patient experienced a thromboembolic event. 1 patient experienced a grade 3 hematologic AE (neutropenia). Conclusions: The combination of THAL and RUX has demonstrated a promising efficacy signal in this initial analysis of an ongoing phase II study, and appears to be well tolerated. Platelet count increases were observed in all patients who entered study with baseline thrombocytopenia, a response which appears to be maintained in the majority of patients observed 6 months after starting combination therapy. As well, anemia responses were observed in 3 of 5 evaluable patients. Collectively, these data indicate a potential role for this regimen in patients with anemia and/or thrombocytopenia, who otherwise have limited treatment options. Updated data on duration of response and overall response of all accrued patients will be presented. Disclosures Rampal: Constellation: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Stemline: Research Funding. Verstovsek:Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Stein:Celgene: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Kadia:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mauro:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Pemmaraju:SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; plexxikon: Research Funding. Bose:Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding.

Combination Therapy with Lenalidomide and Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 206-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
Xavier C. Badoux ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Tumor Lysis ◽  
Flare Reaction ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 206 Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent that has clinical activity in CLL. In patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory CLL treatment with single agent lenalidomide induces an overall response rate of 32–47% when used as monotherapy (Chanan-Khan A.A. et al. 2006; Ferrajoli A. et al. 2008). Rituximab has modest activity as monotherapy, but significally synergizes with chemotherapy agents when administered to pts with CLL. The addition of rituximab to lenalidomide resulted in clinical responses in a small number of pts with CLL that had progressed while on lenalidomide monotherapy (Chanan-Khan A.A. et al. 2006). Because lenalidomide stimulates NK cell proliferation (Wu et al. 2008) we hypothesized that lenalidomide will enhance the activity of rituximab. We, therefore, designed a phase II study to evaluate the combination of lenalidomide and rituximab in pts with relapsed CLL. Pts with CLL and active disease were eligible if they had received prior treatment with purine analog-based therapy. Standard inclusion criteria were required in terms of organ function and performance status, and pts with any ANC or platelet count were eligible. All pts received rituximab (375 mg/m2) intravenously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of cycle 1, and then once every 4 weeks during cycles 3–12. Lenalidomide was given orally at the dose of 10 mg/day starting on day 9 of cycle 1 and continued daily for 12 cycles. Each cycle consisted of 28 days of treatment. During the first two weeks of therapy, allopurinol at the dose of 300 mg daily was prescribed as prophylaxis for tumor lysis. Sixty pts were accrued between October 2008 and July 2009. Thirty-seven pts have received treatment for at least 6 cycles and are evaluable for response and toxicity. The median age is 59 yrs (range 44–83), 15 pts (41%) have Rai stage III-IV disease and the median beta-2M level was 3.6 mg/dL (1.5–9). The median number of prior treatments was 2 (1–9), 9 pts (24%) were refractory to fludarabine and all pts had received prior rituximab. Twenty-six pts (70%) had unmutated IgVH, 9 pts (24%) had chromosome 17p deletion and 10 pts (37%) had 11q deletion by FISH analysis. After 6 cycles of treatment, 25 pts achieved a response [6 nodular PR (16%), 19 PR (51%)] for an OR of 68% (according to 1996 NCI-WG criteria). Six pts (16%) attained stable disease or clinical improvement and are continuing on treatment, and 6 pts (16%) failed to respond, including one death that occurred on day 34 owing to infectious complications. Responses according to pts characteristics are summarized in the table: Most common grade 3–4 treatment related adverse events observed were: neutropenia (16 pts, 43%), fatigue (6 pts,16%) and thrombocytopenia (4 pts, 11%). One pt (3%) developed grade 3 tumor lysis syndrome and 1 pt (3%) had grade 3 joint pain. Infectious complications occurred in 9 pts (24%): neutropenic fever (6 pts), pneumonia (2 pts) and urosepsis (1 pt). Lenalidomide-associated tumor flare reaction was limited to grade 1 (8 pts, 22%) and grade 2 (1 pt, 3%). We examined the effect of therapy with lenalidomide and rituximab on the distribution of circulating B, T, and NK cell subsets. When compared to the baseline, there were significant decreases in the percentage of CD19+CD20+ B cells along with significant increases in the percentages of CD4+ T, CD8+ T, CD4+CD25hiCD127− regulatory T, and CD3−CD16+CD56+ NK cells after 3 cycles of therapy (paired sample t test). In conclusion, our results suggest that the combination of lenalidomide and rituximab is superior to single agent lenalidomide, despite all our pts having received prior rituximab. Additionally, there was no increase in toxicity and lenalidomide-associate tumor flare reaction was less frequent and less severe with this combination compared to single agent lenalidomide. Disclosures: Ferrajoli: Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: The use of Lenalidomide for the treatment of CLL is considered investigational.. O'Brien:Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding. Wierda:Genentech: Honoraria; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Keating:Celgene: Data Monitoring Committee, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

An Open-Label Phase I Study of the Safety and Efficacy of RAD001 in Combination with Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3856-3856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noopur Raje ◽  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Parameswaran N Hari ◽  
Anuj Mahindra ◽  
Sarah Kaster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Oral Steroid ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3856 Poster Board III-792 Background Lenalidomide (Revlimid®, Len) plus dexamethasone (Dex) is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients following ≥1 prior therapy. mTOR inhibitor RAD001 has been studied as a single agent in MM, and although well tolerated, did not have single agent activity. Given the increased toxicity noted with pulsed high dose steroids, we sought to study a non-steroid containing oral regimen for the treatment of relapsed MM predicated upon our previous studies which demonstrated synergistic anti-MM activity of mTOR inhibitors when combined with len. Here, we extended our in vitro observations to a phase I clinical trial combining RAD001 with len in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. The primary objective was to assess toxicity of this combination and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary objective was to determine the activity of this combination. Methods Patients with relapsed and refractory MM were assigned to len and RAD001 to be taken for 21 days of a 28 day cycle. Dose escalation followed a modified Fibonacci design. Patients were allowed to continue therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients received concomitant anti-thrombotic (aspirin 81 or 325 mg/day) therapy. Response was assessed according to modified EBMT and Uniform Criteria, and toxicities were assessed using NCI CTCAE v3.0. Results Eighteen MM patients have been enrolled to date. One patient in cohort 1 (Len: 10mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days) developed grade 3 neutropenia requiring expansion of the cohort. Cohort 2 (Len: 15mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days) also required expansion because of grade 4 thrombocytopenia noted in 1 patient. Dose limiting toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 2/3 patients in cohort 3 (Len: 20mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days). The MTD for patients with MM was therefore declared at 15 mg of len and 5mg of RAD001 for 21 days with a 7 day rest period. Apart from the hematological toxicities expected with the combination, patients otherwise tolerated the regimen well. Most common (≥10%) grade 1 / 2 events included nausea, fatigue, dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, neuropathy and muscle cramps, all of which were manageable with supportive care. No thromboembolic events were noted. Grade 3 / 4 adverse events ≥ 5% included thrombocytopenia (11%) and neutropenia (22%). Fifteen patients have finished at least 2 cycles of therapy: 8 of 15 patients have either stable disease (SD: 1), minimal response (MR: 5) or a partial response (PR: 2), including 7 of 9 patients treated at the recommended MTD for an overall response rate (MR or better) of 50% (90% CI: [30.76%]). One patient with SD continued therapy for a total of 10 cycles, without significant toxicities. Conclusions The combination of Len plus RAD001 is a well tolerated regimen with predictable hematological toxicities. Promising responses were noted in this heavily pretreated patient population. This combination provides an oral steroid free combination alternative strategy which warrants future evaluation in phase II studies. Disclosures: Raje: Astrazeneca : Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: RAD001 not labelled for use in myeloma. Richardson:Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hari:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Laubach:Novartis:. Ghobrial:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Adams:Novartis: Employment. Makrides:Celgene: Employment.

Updated Results of Bortezomib-Naïve Patients in PX-171-004, An Ongoing Open-Label, Phase II Study of Single-Agent Carfilzomib (CFZ) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Myeloma (MM).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 302-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luhua Wang ◽  
David Siegel ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
A. Keith Stewart ◽  
Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Impaired Renal Function ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Ortho Biotech ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Modifications

Abstract Abstract 302 Background: Carfilzomib (CFZ) is a proteasome inhibitor with unique target selectivity and an irreversible binding mechanism that results in sustained proteasome inhibition. In preclinical studies, CFZ lacks non-proteasome off-target activities associated with bortezomib (BTZ) (Kapur et al, Blood 2008). This may account for observed differences in tolerability with CFZ (e.g. minimal neuropathy and myelosuppression), permitting consecutive day dosing and treatment over an extended period of time. We previously observed higher response rates in multiple myeloma (MM) patients without prior BTZ exposure (BTZ-naïve) compared to those with relapsed disease following BTZ therapy (BTZ-treated). Here we present updated data on the BTZ-naïve cohort from PX-171-004, an ongoing Phase 2 study of single-agent CFZ in MM patients with relapsed or refractory disease following 1–3 prior therapies. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory (e.g, < 25% response or disease progression during last treatment) MM were enrolled and stratified into two cohorts: BTZ-naïve and BTZ-treated. CFZ 20 mg/m2 IV was administered on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 every 28 days, for up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was Overall Response Rate [≥ Partial Response (PR)] per International Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma. Secondary endpoints included Clinical Benefit Response [CBR = ORR + Minor Reponse (MR)] and safety. Results: Fifty-seven BTZ-naive patients have been enrolled and 56 subjects have received at least one dose of CFZ. Prior therapies included alkylators (81%), stem cell transplant (SCT) (77%), thalidomide (THAL) (67%), lenalidomide (LEN) (42%), and anthracyclines (23%). Ten (18%) patients had received both LEN and THAL and 18 (32%) patients were refractory to their most recent regimen prior to study entry. At baseline, 30 (53%) patients had an ECOG score ≥ 1, 21 (37%) had neuropathy Grade ≥ 1, 12 (21%) had impaired renal function (CrCl < 60 mL/min) and 10 (18%) had diabetes. The mean time from diagnosis was 4 years (range 0.7–24). To date, the mean number of CFZ doses administered was 29.2 (∼5 four-week cycles; range 2–72 doses, 1–12 cycles). Fifty-one patients initiated therapy and were evaluable for response per protocol. The ORR was 45% (23/51 patients) and included 1 CR, 4 VGPR and 18 PR. An additional 9 (18%) patients had MR and 10 (20%) had stable disease (SD) for ≥ 6 weeks. The most common (>25%) adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (59%), nausea (41%), dyspnea (36%), and anemia (29%), and were primarily ≤ Grade 2. Grade 3/4 AEs occurring in ≥ 5% of patients were thrombocytopenia (9%), fatigue (9%), neutropenia (7%), lymphopenia (7%), anemia (5%), pneumonia (5%) and hyperglycemia (5%). One (1.7%) patient had febrile neutropenia. Dose modifications were rarely required. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) of any grade was infrequent (7 patients, 12%) with a single case of Grade 3 PN (2%) in a pt with a history of THAL-induced PN that lasted 41 days. The CFZ dose was reduced and the event resolved to Grade 1 while on CFZ and prior to study discontinuation. Of the12 patients with impaired renal function at baseline, none required dose modifications due to renal AE. Overall, 5 patients have completed the full 12-cycle protocol and another 5 (9%) have completed ≥ 9 cycles; 17 patients (30%) are continuing on study. Conclusions: The 45% ORR (CBR 63%) is noteworthy for a single-agent regimen in patients with tumor progression despite therapy with novel combinations. CFZ can be safely administered to patients with significant comorbidities (e.g. peripheral neuropathy, leukopenia, renal dysfunction, diabetes) when other anti-myeloma agents may not be well tolerated. Enrollment to PX-171-004 is continuing and, based on the safety profile, subjects are now permitted to dose escalate to 27 mg/m2. Disclosures: Wang: Proteolix: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: testing testing. Siegel:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Jakubowiak:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Bahlis:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. McDonagh:Proteolix: Research Funding. Belch:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Le:Proteolix, Inc.: Employment. Bennett:Proteolix: Employment. Kunkel:Proteolix: Consultancy, Employment. Kauffman:Proteolix, Inc.: Employment. Vij:Proteolix, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Phase I Trial of Everolimus and Rituximab or Everolimus, Bortezomib and Rituximab in Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2705-2705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene M. Ghobrial ◽  
Erica N Boswell ◽  
Ranjit Banwait ◽  
Tiffany Poon ◽  
Amanda Donovan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2705 INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of the combination of everolimus and rituximab, or everolimus, bortezomib, and rituximab in relapsed and/or relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia. This trial was based on our preclinical studies that demonstrated synergistic activity of everolimus and bortezomib with rituximab in WM cell lines, and based on our favorable clinical experience with everolimus as single agent in the treatment of WM. METHODS: Eligibility criteria include: 1) patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory WM with any number of prior lines of therapy, including everolimus and bortezomib 2) not completely refractory to rituximab 3) measurable disease by monoclonal IgM protein in the serum and lymphoplasmacytic cells in the bone marrow, 4) Not receiving chemotherapy > 3 weeks, or biological/novel therapy for WM > 2 weeks. A cycle is 28 days and a total of 6 cycles are given, followed by everolimus maintenance for 2 years. Two stages with a total of four dose levels were planned. In stage A, patients received everolimus at the recommended dose orally daily for 28 days and rituximab at the recommended dose IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days at cycle 1 and 4 only. In stage B, patients received everolimus at the recommended dose orally daily for 28 days, bortezomib at the recommended dose IV on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days, and rituximab at the recommended dose IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days at cycle 1 and 4 only. Patients were assessed for response after every cycle. Subjects who had a response continued on therapy for a total of 6 cycles, and then continued on to maintenance therapy with everolimus alone until progression (or for a maximum of 24 months). Because of the potential of an IgM flare after rituximab, patients who showed an increase in IgM after rituximab in the first 3 months were not deemed as having progressive disease unless they showed evidence of clinical progression. To examine the in vivo effect of everolimus, bortezomib, and rituximab, peripheral blood samples were obtained from patients on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 at cycle 1; and on day 1 only at all subsequent cycles. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled in this phase I clinical trial from April 2009 to July 2011. The median age is 61 (range, 52–73) yrs and the median lines of prior therapy is 2 (range, 1–8) with all patients receiving prior rituximab and 12 (52%) receiving prior bortezomib. The median number of cycles on therapy was 3.5 (range, 0–15). Overall, this combination therapy is very well tolerated. Grade 4 toxicities included: neutropenia (8.7%), leukopenia (4.3%), thrombocytopenia (17.4%), lymphopenia (4.3%) and hypertriglyceridemia (4.3%). Grade 3 toxicities included: neutropenia (21.7%), leukopenia (26.1%), anemia (13%), lymphopenia (17.4%), pneumonitis (4.3%), SGPT (4.3%), neuropathy (4.3%), Herpes zoster reactivation (4.3%), hyperglycemia (4.3%) and hypernatremia (4.3%). 1 patient discontinued therapy due to grade 3 anemia. Nineteen patients are currently evaluable for response, including 1 (5%) very good partial response (VGPR) and 9 (47%) minimal response (MR), for an overall response rate including MR of 10/19 (53%) in this relapsed/refractory population. Furthermore, overall response including MR in stage A (everolimus/rituximab) was 2/6 (33%) and 8/13 (62%) in stage B (everolimus/bortezomib/rituximab). Additionally, 9 (39%) patients achieved stable disease, and 4 (17%) are early on therapy and not been yet assessed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of everolimus, bortezomib, and rituximab is generally well tolerated, and importantly no grade 3/4 neuropathy was seen. Moreover, no dose limiting toxicities were observed even at the maximum dose evaluated. The responses observed to date in this relapsed/refractory population are encouraging. Based on the safety of this phase I study, the phase II study of two arms, everolimus/rituximab for low risk patients and everolimus/bortezomib/rituximab for intermediate and high risk patients is underway. Disclosures: Ghobrial: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Noxxon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Bortezomib and everolimus in WM. Anderson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Treon:Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document