A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cyclophosphamide Versus Fludarabine in Addition of Antithymocyte Globuline for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Adult Severe Aplastic Anemia; Interim Analysis

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3890-3890
Author(s):  
Hawk Kim ◽  
Won-Sik Lee ◽  
Yeo-Kyeoung Kim ◽  
Young-Don Joo ◽  
Jinny Park ◽  
...  

Abstract Our previous study showed that a less toxic regimen comprising reduced cyclophosphamide (Cy), fludarabine and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (Cy-Flu-ATG), was less toxic for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) compared with standard Cy-ATG in patients with adult severe aplastic anemia (AA). We postulated that replacing Cy with Flu (Flu-ATG) would be more beneficial. Therefore we performed a randomized phase III study to compare the regimen-related toxicities (RRTs) of two different conditioning regimens: Cy-ATG vs. Flu-ATG. We present the interim alaysis. Patients in the Cy-ATG arm received Cy at 200 mg/kg. Those in the Flu-ATG arm received fludarabine (Flu) at 180 mg/m2. A total of 36 patients (21 in the Cy-ATG and 15 in the Flu-ATG) were enrolled. The basic patientsÕ characteristics were similar between both arms except for donor type and HLA-matching. There were more unrelated donor (38.1% vs. 73.3%; p=0.037) and HLA mis-matching (0% vs. 40%; p=0.001) in Flu-ATG arm. All predefined RRTs were similar between Cy-ATG and Flu-ATG (33.3% vs. 33.3%; p=1.000). There was no primary engraftment failure in both arms and only one patients in Cy-ATG died of treatment-related hepatic toxicity before engraftment. Also there were no differences between Cy-ATG and Flu-ATG arms in terms of secondary engraftment failure (20% vs. 20%; p=1.000), hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (0% vs. 0%; p=1.000), hemorrhagic cystitis (4.8% vs. 0%; p=1.000), pulmonary complications (12.5% vs. 16.7%; p=1.000). The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (14.3% vs. 20.0%; p=0.677) and chronic GvHD (11.8% vs. 7.7% ; p=1.000) were also similar. The 3-year survival rate did not differ (77.3% vs. 77.0%; p=0.995; Figure 1). Flu-ATG can be Figure 1 promising in terms of RRT without increasing engraftment failure in Flu-ATG arm when considering more unrelated and HLA-mismaching patients were enrolled. We will continue this phase III trial. Figure 1. promising in terms of RRT without increasing engraftment failure in Flu-ATG arm when considering more unrelated and HLA-mismaching patients were enrolled. We will continue this phase III trial. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2016 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hawk Kim ◽  
Je-Hwan Lee ◽  
Young-Don Joo ◽  
Sung-Hwa Bae ◽  
Sang Min Lee ◽  
...  

We performed a study on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) from an HLA-haplo-identical familial donor (haploFD) using a busulfan-fludarabine-antithymocyte globulin conditioning regimen for severe aplastic anemia (sAA) and hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndrome. For the comparison between a haploFD and an alternative donor (AD; matched unrelated or partially matched donor) for sAA in adults, we collected haploFD data retrospectively and prospectively. Forty-eight AD cases were selected for the comparison with 16 haploFD cases. All transplantation outcomes except for extensive chronic graft versus host disease (GvHD) were similar. The frequencies of hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (p = 1.000), acute GvHD (p = 0.769), grade 3/4 acute GvHD (p = 0.258), chronic GvHD (p = 0.173), extensive chronic GvHD (p = 0.099), primary neutrophil engraftment failure (p = 1.000), secondary graft failure (p = 1.000) and platelet engraftment failure (p = 0.505) were similar. Time to neutrophil engraftment was faster in haploFD (p = 0.003), while the cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment was similar (p = 0.505). Overall survival was also similar between AD and haploFD (p = 0.730). In conclusion, alloHCT from haploFD in sAA was comparable with alloHCT from AD, but extensive chronic GvHD seemed frequent in haploFD. Therefore alloHCT from haploFD could be an alternative approach for alloHCT from AD in adult sAA.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3876-3876
Author(s):  
Hawk Kim ◽  
Yunsuk Choi ◽  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
Soo-Mee Bang ◽  
Hyeoung-Joon Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Upfront allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) as first line therapy for older than 40 or 50 years is not usually recommended for severe aplastic anemia patients even though there are suitable matched sibling donors because they usually have poor outcomes after alloHCT. Therefore, first line immune suppression therapy (IST) is recommended. However, current outstanding alloHCT outcome can make it possible to try upfront alloHCT even in older AA patients. The purpose of this retrospective study is to determine the transplantation-related results in AA patients older than 40 years. This study collected data retrospectively for older AA patients. Congenital bone marrow failure was excluded from this study. alloHCT was divided as upfront and second alloHCT according to prior IST. Total 129 patients were enrolled in this study from 2001 to 2017. Age at diagnosis and at alloHCT were 25 to 63 (median 48.0) years and 40.3-64.9 (median 49.1) years, respectively. Median time from diagnosis to alloHCT was 5.2 (range, 1-234.1) months. Upfront and second alloHCT were 42 and 87 patients, respectively. Upfront alloHCT received more stem cells from related donors, more BM stem cells and more fludarabine conditioning compared with second alloHCT (83.3% vs. 58.6%, p=0.005; 52.4% vs. 74.7%, p=0.011; 52.4% vs. 30.2%, p=0.015, respectively). However, ABO mismatching (p=0.747), TBI conditioning (p=0.547), cyclophosphamide conditioning (p=0.114), ATG conditioning (p=0.483) were similar between upfront and second alloHCT. Any engraftment failure, neutrophil engraftment failure and platelet engraftment failure were similar between upfront and second alloHCT (28.6% vs. 28.7%, p=0.985; 19.0% vs. 18.4%, p=0.928; 19.0% vs. 34.5%, p=0.072). Hepatic SOS, acute GvHD and chronic GvHD were also similar between upfront and second alloHCT (4.8% vs. 5.7%, p=0.817; 28.6% vs. 36.5%, p=0.376; 19.0% vs. 19.5%, p=0.947). Survival rates at 1Y, 2Y, 3Y and 5Y were 90.7, 82.2, 73.5 and 64.3%, respectively. Survival rates at 5 years in upfront and second alloHCT were 76.2 and 54.1%, respectively (p=0.059). Survival rates at 5 years (5YSR) in age 40-50y, 50-60y, and older than 60y were 64.1, 62.4 and 50.0%, respectively (p=0.349). alloHCT from matched related donor or other donors had similar survival rates (p=0.404). However, upfront alloHCT showed superior survival rate (5YSR 76.5% vs. 53.2%, p=0.114) without statistical significance compared with second alloHCT even in matched related donor subgroup. This trend is similar in alternative donor subgroup (5YSR 75.0% in upfront alloHCT vs. 54.9% in second alloHCT, p=0.459). alloHCT in older AA showed promising results even in patient older than 60 years although upfront alloHCT showed marginal statistical superiority. In conclusion, upfront alloHCT in older AA needs further confirmation by prospective studies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document