Outcomes of patients with detectable CMV DNA at randomization in the phase III trial of letermovir for the prevention of CMV infection in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1703-1711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco M. Marty ◽  
Per T. Ljungman ◽  
Roy F. Chemaly ◽  
Hong Wan ◽  
Valerie L. Teal ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3890-3890
Author(s):  
Hawk Kim ◽  
Won-Sik Lee ◽  
Yeo-Kyeoung Kim ◽  
Young-Don Joo ◽  
Jinny Park ◽  
...  

Abstract Our previous study showed that a less toxic regimen comprising reduced cyclophosphamide (Cy), fludarabine and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (Cy-Flu-ATG), was less toxic for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) compared with standard Cy-ATG in patients with adult severe aplastic anemia (AA). We postulated that replacing Cy with Flu (Flu-ATG) would be more beneficial. Therefore we performed a randomized phase III study to compare the regimen-related toxicities (RRTs) of two different conditioning regimens: Cy-ATG vs. Flu-ATG. We present the interim alaysis. Patients in the Cy-ATG arm received Cy at 200 mg/kg. Those in the Flu-ATG arm received fludarabine (Flu) at 180 mg/m2. A total of 36 patients (21 in the Cy-ATG and 15 in the Flu-ATG) were enrolled. The basic patientsÕ characteristics were similar between both arms except for donor type and HLA-matching. There were more unrelated donor (38.1% vs. 73.3%; p=0.037) and HLA mis-matching (0% vs. 40%; p=0.001) in Flu-ATG arm. All predefined RRTs were similar between Cy-ATG and Flu-ATG (33.3% vs. 33.3%; p=1.000). There was no primary engraftment failure in both arms and only one patients in Cy-ATG died of treatment-related hepatic toxicity before engraftment. Also there were no differences between Cy-ATG and Flu-ATG arms in terms of secondary engraftment failure (20% vs. 20%; p=1.000), hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (0% vs. 0%; p=1.000), hemorrhagic cystitis (4.8% vs. 0%; p=1.000), pulmonary complications (12.5% vs. 16.7%; p=1.000). The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (14.3% vs. 20.0%; p=0.677) and chronic GvHD (11.8% vs. 7.7% ; p=1.000) were also similar. The 3-year survival rate did not differ (77.3% vs. 77.0%; p=0.995; Figure 1). Flu-ATG can be Figure 1 promising in terms of RRT without increasing engraftment failure in Flu-ATG arm when considering more unrelated and HLA-mismaching patients were enrolled. We will continue this phase III trial. Figure 1. promising in terms of RRT without increasing engraftment failure in Flu-ATG arm when considering more unrelated and HLA-mismaching patients were enrolled. We will continue this phase III trial. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110604
Author(s):  
Kelly G Hawks ◽  
Amanda Fegley ◽  
Roy T Sabo ◽  
Catherine H Roberts ◽  
Amir A Toor

Introduction Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common and clinically significant viral infections following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Currently available options for CMV prophylaxis and treatment present challenges related to side effects and cost. Methods In this retrospective medical record review, the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CMV disease or reactivation requiring preemptive treatment) following allogeneic HCT was compared in patients receiving valacyclovir 1 g three times daily versus acyclovir 400 mg every 12 h for viral prophylaxis. Results Forty-five patients who received valacyclovir were matched based on propensity scoring to 35 patients who received acyclovir. All patients received reduced-intensity conditioning regimens containing anti-thymocyte globulin. Clinically significant CMV infection by day + 180 was lower in the valacyclovir group compared to the acyclovir group (18% vs. 57%, p = 0.0004). Patients receiving valacyclovir prophylaxis also had less severe infection evidenced by a reduction in CMV disease, lower peak CMV titers, delayed CMV reactivation, and less secondary neutropenia. Conclusion Prospective evaluation of valacyclovir 1 g three times daily for viral prophylaxis following allogeneic HCT is warranted. Due to valacyclovir's favorable toxicity profile and affordable cost, it has the potential to benefit patients on a broad scale as an option for CMV prophylaxis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (12) ◽  
pp. 3665-3673
Author(s):  
Régis Peffault De Latour ◽  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
Sarah Alami ◽  
Laurie Lévy‐Bachelot ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Styczyński

AbstractCytomegalovirus (CMV), the beta-human herpesvirus type 5 (HHV-5), is a major cause of morbidity in immunocompromised hosts, especially recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) or solid organ transplantation. The standard-of-care approach to CMV prevention based on CMV surveillance-guided preemptive therapy is being challenged by the recent approval of letermovir (LMV) for primary prophylaxis. Real-word clinical data show dramatic improvement in the reduction of risk of CMV infection and any CMV viremia in all studies performed so far. LMV is the drug that is breaking the paradigm of preemptive therapy with shift to prophylaxis. A summary of reported data presented in 2019 annual meetings of American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT), European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and American Society of Hematology (ASH), as well as already published results, is presented in this review. A total number of 401 adult high-risk patients on primary prophylaxis after HCT were reported in 11 studies up to January 1, 2020. It was shown that fewer patients in the LMV arms had any CMV reactivation or need for CMV treatment compared with the any other prophylactic or preemptive approaches. In conclusion, LMV is much highly effective than CMV-guided preemptive therapy in preventing CMV infection and CMV disease. The use of LMV in prophylaxis results in an improvement in overall survival during the first 24 and 48 weeks. LMV has a favorable safety profile, as it does not cause myelotoxicity. Current guidelines of European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL7) recommend LMV for the use in prophylaxis of CMV infection in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document