scholarly journals Low dose Rituximab for Preemptive Management of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura ( TTP )

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5029-5029
Author(s):  
John C. Nelson

Abstract Low dose rituximab has been successful in treating some patients with autoimmune cytopenias. Recently reported data indicate preemptive rituximab may postpone hematologic relapses of TTP in patients with chronic severe ADAMTS13 deficiency. A now 22-year-old woman had multi-relapsing TTP with five episodes over the previous 10 years, three of which were successfully treated with four doses of rituximab 375 mg/m2. The most recent course in 2009 was given preemptively because intense ADAMTS13 monitoring had shown that previous hematologic relapses followed shortly after developing severe ADAMTS13 deficiency. Asymptomatic chronic IgG deficiency less than 300 mg% had followed this most recent rituximab course given in 2009. In 2014, continued intense ADAMTS13 monitering disclosed a new progressive decrease in ADAMTS13 levels from normal to severely deficient levels with a weak inhibitor, but no hematologic or clinical changes. Just two 100 mg rituximab doses have been followed by a progressive rise of ADAMTS13 levels to solidly normal values with significant improvement by day 13 post initiation and normalization by day 34. Low dose rituximab could be a viable alternative for preemptively managing TTP patients with persistently severly low ADAMTS13 levels. Disclosures Off Label Use: Off label use of rituximab to treat TTP.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 742-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos de Lima ◽  
Simrit Parmar ◽  
Julianne J Chen ◽  
Sergio A Giralt ◽  
Gabriela Rondon ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 742 AZA has immunomodulatory properties that may affect donor lymphocytes favorably, potentially leading to less GVHD after HSCT. We have been investigating low-dose AZA (32 mg/m2 daily for 5 days) to prevent AML/MDS relapse after HSCT. Interestingly, in our dose finding phase I study (Cancer, 2010) there was a suggestion of less cGVHD with longer AZA treatments. We then hypothesized that this approach leads to less cGVHD, and performed a comparison of patients that received AZA to prevent relapse versus historic controls that did not receive the drug. Major objective of this analysis is to determine the cumulative incidence of cGVHD with versus without AZA. Methods. Patients received AZA based on high risk of relapse disease, starting at a median of 45 days from transplant (range, 17–149). AZA effect on aGVHD was not studied since the drug was started after most cases of aGVHD had already occurred or/and had resolved or improved. Patients with active acute GVHD (aGVHD) were not eligible to receive AZA. Median dose was 32 mg/m2 (range, 8–40). Median number of AZA cycles was 3 (range, 1–54), and median time on AZA for patients that received >3 cycles (n=37) was 144 days (range, 93–1329). Using a computer algorithm, we randomly selected from our departmental database a control group consisting of patients who had received HSCT within the same time period, and had similar GVHD prophylaxis, stem cell source, and comparable low risk of grade II-IV aGVHD (Table). Two hundred and thirty patients were identified fulfilling these criteria. The rate of cGVHD was compared between the AZA group (grouped as 1–3 cycles and >3 cycles) and the control group, in a landmark analysis starting at 6 months after HSCT. Leukemia relapse or death in remission before cGVHD onset were considered as competing risks in this analysis. Results. Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 1–99) in the AZA group, and 31 months (range, 1.5–117) in the control group. 29, 24, and 115 patients in the >3 AZA cycles, 1–3 AZA cycles, and the control group were evaluable for the 6-month landmark analysis, respectively. The numbers of patients developing cGVHD and the HR at 2 years in this analysis were as follows: 53 of 115 controls (reference group), 11 of 24 patients who received 1–3 AZA cycles (HR at 2 years, 0.9; P=NS), and 6 of 29 patients who received >3 AZA cycles (HR at 2 years, 0.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1–0.8; P=0.02) developed cGVHD. Similarly, in a landmark analysis, the cumulative incidence of cGVHD was significantly lower in the subgroup that received >3 AZA cycles (figure). Conclusion. Low-dose AZA appears to reduce the likelihood of developing cGVHD. We are investigating if this effect is associated with preservation or improvement of the graft-versus-leukemia effect in an ongoing, randomized study. Disclosures: de Lima: Celgene: Research Funding. Off Label Use: azacitidine: off-label use as maintenance therapy following allogeneic stem cell transplant for MDS/AML. garcia Manero:celgene: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 911-911
Author(s):  
Ahmet H. Elmaagacli ◽  
Markus Ditschkowski ◽  
Nina-Kristin Steckel ◽  
Hellmut Ottinger ◽  
Uwe Hillen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is associated with a substantial morbidity and mortality. It is a systemic inflammatory disorder that reflects the lack of immune tolerance between donor-derived immune competent cells and host organs. Human chorionic gonadotropin hormone (hCG) is a natural occurring hormone during pregnancy secreted by syncytiotrophoblasts of the placenta. We had previously observed (Koldehoff et al; J Leukoc Biol 2011) that the rejection of transplanted skin was significantly delayed by hCG in a mouse skin transplant model and had also demonstrated that tryptophan-catabolizing enzyme, indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase(IDO), interleukin-10 (IL 10) and T-regulatory cells (Tregs) increased significantly in females treated with hCG as preconditioning therapy for in-vitro-fertilization. Since all these factors are known to induce tolerance and given the low rate of adverse effects, we off-label used low dose of hCG to treat 20 patients as forth- or fifth-line therapy with steroid-refractory or intolerant severe-grade chronic GVHD. Patients Because all of these factors are known to induce tolerance and given the low rate of adverse effects in preconditioning therapy, we off-label used low dose of hCG (187 IU) to treat 8 male and 12 female patients (median age 48, r. 28-68) with moderate or severe grade of chronic GVHD according to the NIH criteria; all patients had been informed of the experimental state of this treatment and provided written consent. Results The median number of sites of chronic GVHD involvement per patient was 3 (range, 1-6). hCG therapy was started as 4 or 5th line-therapy together with preexisting medication with prednisone and a calcineurin inhibitor. Twelve of 20 patients (60%) had an objective partial response during 8 weeks of hCG treatment with at least 50% improvement according to the TSS score. Responses included softened skin and subcutaneous tissue; decreased erythema and extent of sclerodermatous, hidebound skin; improved joint mobility and gait; gastrointestinal improvements; and resolution of neuropathy. Nine patients had stable disease (6 with minor responses). Only one patient with previous ATG treatment showed progression of her liver GVHD (histologically proven) and died from GHVD. All other patients were well and alive. Daily low-dose hCG was well tolerated. Adverse events that were possibly related to hCG included reversible and asymptomatic CTCAE grade 4 hypertriglyceridemia (n=1), grade 2 constitutional symptoms (fever, malaise, fatigue; flush, breast enlargement). IDO expression increased up to 8 times and IL10-serum level up to 2 times after 3 weeks of hCG therapy (p<0.003 and p<0.04). T-regulatory cell expansion was documented in 3 patients. Conclusion This successful use of hCG in an immune disorder warrants further studies to assess its role as an immunosuppressant in GVHD and potentially other autoimmune disorders. Disclosures: Off Label Use: The off-label use of HCG will be presented here for the first tiem for treatment of chronic GVHD and will clearly marked as off-label use.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4103-4103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Christophe Ianotto ◽  
Françoise Boyer-Perrard ◽  
Jean-Loup Demory ◽  
Jerome Rey ◽  
Lydia Roy ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4103 Background: The moderate effect of most palliative treatments in primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF), in addition to the limited possibilities of allogeneic stem cell transplantation, has incited physicians to look for alternative treatments. Since 1987, several studies have suggested that interferon may be beneficial in the treatment of MF. However, important hematological and general limiting toxicities frequently occur in MF patients (pts), leading to rapid treatment discontinuation in more than 50% of pts. Better results were recently reported in a small series of 13 MF pts treated with Peg-Interferon-α2a (Ianotto et al., Br J Haematol, 2009). The present study aimed to collect data of pts with primary and secondary MF treated with Peg-Interferon-α2a in French centers members of the FIM (French Intergroup of Myeloproliferative disorders) and GEM (Groupe d'Etudes des Myelofibroses) groups, to better assess tolerance and efficacy of this form of interferon in MF. Patients and Methods: Between Dec 2006 and Feb 2010, 39 MF pts treated with Peg-Interferon-α2a were registered from 10 different French centers affiliated to FIM and GEM groups. Age of pts ranged from 41 to 81 years, 21 were men and 18 women. Sixteen pts had primary MF, 13 had post-PV and 10 post-ET MF, respectively. Twenty-five patients (64%) were JAK2V617F positive. Twenty-eight patients had previously received other cytoreductive treatment. Clinical and biological parameters were collected at diagnosis and every 3 months. Responses were assessed according to the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria. Analyses were performed in July 2010, after a median follow-up of 18 months (range: 3 – 42 months). Results: Among the 28 patients with splenomegaly, we observed 10 responses (36%) including 7 complete and 3 partial responses. Fourteen patients had constitutional symptoms which resolved in 8 of them (57%). Seven of 15 patients (47%) with an initial hemoglobin level below 100 g/L achieved complete response (CR). Three of 8 (37%) transfused pts became transfusion-independent. Twenty-two patients had abnormal WBC count which normalized in 13 of them (59%). Platelet count was abnormal in 27 patients, and 14 (52%) achieved CR with Peg-Interferon-α2a treatment. The evolution of the JAK2V617F allele burden is currently under investigation and will be presented at the meeting. The initial median dose of Peg-Interferon-α2a effectively received was 103 μ g/wk, further decreased to a median of 85 μ g/wk after one year. At time of analysis, treatment was stopped in 11/39 (28%) pts due to side effects, inefficacy or hematologic evolution. Conclusion: In this observational study, we found higher efficacy and better tolerance of interferon than previously reported in patients with primary or secondary MF. Such results were possibly due to a better tolerance of the pegylated form used, and to the low-dose schedule applied by the physicians. Our results suggest at least that Peg-Interferon-α2a should be considered as a possible therapeutic option in selected MF patients. Future clinical trials in MF will hopefully involve combinations of low dose Peg-Interferon-α2a with JAK2-inhibitors or immunomodulatory agents in order to improve tolerability and increase efficacy. Disclosures: Off Label Use: This is an observational study of the off-label use of peg-Interferon-alfa2a in myelofibrosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (04) ◽  
pp. 361-371
Author(s):  
Karl Peter Ittner ◽  
Joachim Koppenberg ◽  
Ute Walter
Keyword(s):  

ZusammenfassungWenn zugelassene Arzneimittel außerhalb der in der entsprechenden Fachinformation dargelegten Beschreibungen angewendet werden, dann spricht man von einer nicht zulassungskonformen Anwendung oder von einem Off-Label-Use. Wie in fast allen medizinischen Fachgebieten gibt es auch im Rettungsdienst sogenannte Off-Label-Use-Pharmakotherapien. Sofern evidenzbasierte Informationen zu einer nicht zulassungskonformen Anwendung vorliegen, und insbesondere im konkreten Notfall keine zulassungskonforme Möglichkeit besteht, dann ist diese gerechtfertigt. Verwendet ein Notarzt aber ein Medizinprodukt außerhalb der Zulassung, dann stellt er ein neues Produkt her und haftet persönlich bei einem Patientenschaden.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document