Comparison Between R-CHOP Vs R-CHOP Plus Etoposide in Untreated Patients with Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma: Preliminary Findings

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5437-5437
Author(s):  
Felipe Vieira Rodrigues Maciel ◽  
Roberta Shcolnik Szor ◽  
Debora Levy ◽  
Rodrigo Santucci ◽  
Juliana Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Mediastinal Mass ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Overal Survival

Abstract Background: Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma originating from the thymus with its own epidemiological, clinical, immunophenotypic and prognostic features and that was included as a distinct clinical entity in the last World Health Organization classification (2008). It is more prevalent in young female, and is characterized by a large mediastinal mass, with frequent infiltration of adjacent structures. Dissemination by distant sites may be identified at diagnosis or during the disease progression. It shows many similar aspects to nodular sclerosis Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in terms of clinical, pathological and immunohistochemical features. The standard treatment is based on multidrug regimens containing anthracyclines associated with rituximab and consolidation with radiotherapy. A recent study published in the NEJM in 2013, with a single-arm treatment with infusional dose-adjusted DA-EPOCH-R with no radiotherapy in untreated PMBCL, demonstrated 97% of overall survival (OS) and 93% of event-free survival (EFS) with a median of 5 years of follow-up. Methods: We analyzed retrospectively 40 patients with PMBCL treated at São Paulo’s Cancer Institute from June 2007 to January 2014. The objectives of the study were to compare the complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates between two different treatment strategies. All patients were initially evaluated with blood tests, whole-body computed tomography (CT) or fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography (PET-CT) and bone marrow biopsy. Two chemotherapy regimens were used in the patient’s treatment: 6 to 8 cycles of conventional R-CHOP 21 with or without radiation therapy (n = 23) and R-CHOP regimen with addition etoposide (DA-EPOCH-R or R-CHOEP) with or without radiotherapy (n = 17). After 4 cycles of treatment, patients were evaluated for response to determine the total number of cycles (6 or 8). Results Among the 40 enrolled patients, 65% were female with median age of 31 years (range 14 to 62 years). The median size of the mediastinal mass was 13cm in the longest axis. Half of the patients (50%) were in advanced stage (III or IV of Ann Arbor staging) and 75% were in good prognosis category of R-IPI ( 1 or 2 risk factors of the International Prognostic Index Score for non Hodgkin lymphoma). 57,5% of patients were treated with R-CHOP and 42,5% had etoposide as part of the their treatment regimen (12,5% DA-EPOCH-R and 30% R-CHOP plus etoposide (100mg/m2 D1-D3). There was no statistically significant difference in CR rate between RCHOP vs RCHOP + etoposide (86.9% vs 86.6%). There were no differences in PFS or OS for the 2 groups (p=0.8202 and 0.9410). Conclusion The addition of etoposide to RCHOP regimen appears to increase OS and PFS of patients with untreated PMBCL as previously demonstrated. In our service, where there is difficult in hospitalization for the administration of infusional regimens such as DA-EPOCH-R, it was necessary to adjust for outpatient to R-CHOEP. The comparison between the two groups (RCHOP vs RCHOEP/DA-EPOCH-R) showed no statistically significant difference in CR, OS and PFS. However, the median of follow-up of patients who received etoposide was not sufficient to analyze the data adequately. Overall Survival Figure 1. Overal survival betwen R-CHOP and R-CHOEP in PMBCL (p = 0.8202) Figure 1. Overal survival betwen R-CHOP and R-CHOEP in PMBCL (p = 0.8202) Progression Free Survival Figure 2. Progression free survival betwen R-CHOP and R-CHOEP in PMBCL (p = 0.9410). Figure 2. Progression free survival betwen R-CHOP and R-CHOEP in PMBCL (p = 0.9410). Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

R-CHOP in Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma (PMBL): Results from the UK NCRI R-CHOP 14 v 21 Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2689-2689
Author(s):  
Mary Gleeson ◽  
Eliza A Hawkes ◽  
David Cunningham ◽  
Nick Chadwick ◽  
Nick Counsell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mediastinal Mass ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Who 2008

Abstract Introduction: Primary Mediastinal B-cell Lymphoma (PMBL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) comprising approximately 10% of cases. Studies in the pre-rituximab (R) era suggested a benefit for dose intensified regimens such as V/MACOP-B over cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP). However no prospective studies comparing dose intensified regimens with R-CHOP have been performed in the rituximab era and controversy exists regarding the current optimal induction chemotherapy. R-CHOP +/- involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) is the most commonly used regimen worldwide with reported 5-yr relapse free and overall survival rates of 68-81% and 79-91% respectively; but with the exception of the MInT trial (which evaluated young patients with PMBL aged ≤60 years with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index of 0-1), the evidence for R-CHOP in PMBL comes from retrospective studies. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the outcomes for R-CHOP treated PMBL patients within the UK NCRI R-CHOP 14 v 21 prospective trial. Methods: The phase III randomised UK R-CHOP-14 vs 21 trial assessed R-CHOP given 2 weekly versus 3 weekly in 1080 DLBCL patients aged ≥ 18years who were enrolled from 2005-2008. We previously reported that R-CHOP-14 was not superior to R-CHOP-21 for overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), response rate or safety (Cunningham D et al, Lancet May 2013). Patients with PMBL were not excluded from participation and we identified cases by searching the trial database for patients with a mediastinal mass (≥5cm) who also fulfilled the WHO 2008 clinical criteria for sites of involvement (absence of disease involvement outside of the thorax +/- cervical / supraclavicular lymph node involvement). Response was assessed according to the IWG 1999 criteria. PFS and OS were calculated from date of randomisation and analysed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: 50/1,080 (4.6%) patients from the R-CHOP 14 v 21 study database met the WHO 2008 criteria for PMBL and were included in this analysis, with a median follow-up of 7.3 years. The median age at diagnosis was 38.5 years (range 22-78 years). 50% (n=25) of the patients were female. All patients had stage I (n=18, 36%) or II (n=32, 64%) disease. The median mediastinal mass diameter was 11.1cm (range 6-23cm) and 70% (n=35) of patients had a mediastinal mass ≥10cm. 28 (56%) and 22 (44%) patients were treated with R-CHOP-21 and R-CHOP-14 respectively. On completion of R-CHOP chemotherapy CT response was complete (CR) in 43% (n=21), partial (PR) in 49% (n=24), stable disease (SD) in 2% (n=1) and progressive disease (PD) in 6% (n=3), one patient was non-evaluable. IFRT was administered to 58% of patients (n=29). For all patients (n=50) the 5-year PFS was 80.0% (95% CI 68.7-91.1) and 5-year OS was 84.0% (95% CI 73.8-94.2), as shown in Figures 1 and 2 respectively. 5/10 PFS and 4/9 OS events occurred in patients who had received consolidation IFRT post R-CHOP. Where disease progression occurred 9/10 events occurred within the first-year of follow-up. Conclusion: Our data confirms the efficacy of R-CHOP in the management of PMBL and is a benchmark for future studies in PMBL. This is to our knowledge, the largest reported cohort of R-CHOP treated PMBL patients from a prospective trial. The strength of this analysis lies in the long duration of follow-up, the strict selection of patients according to the WHO 2008 criteria and the inclusion of all patients ≥ 18 years without an upper age limit. In line with previous studies we found that disease progression in PMBL occurs early and late relapses are rare. Over half of the patients in our analysis (58%) received consolidation IFRT following R-CHOP. Response assessment by FDG-PET-CT on completion of R-CHOP was not mandated by the study protocol and whether IFRT could have been avoided for PET negative patients in our cohort is unknown. The currently accruing IELSG 37 prospective trial will help to address this important clinical question in PMBL. Excellent results have recently been reported with the combination of DA-EPOCH-R in PMBL, but the efficacy of such dose-intensified regimens in comparison to R-CHOP needs to be evaluated in prospective randomised studies. Figure 1. Progression Free Survival (n=50) Figure 1. Progression Free Survival (n=50) Figure 2. Overall Survival (n=50) Figure 2. Overall Survival (n=50) Disclosures Cunningham: Amgen: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Merck Serono: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Merrimack: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Pocock:Janssen: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Real-World Outcome of Dose-Adjusted EPOCH-R, a Single-Centre Experience

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 27-28
Author(s):  
Rachel Wong ◽  
Roopesh R. Kansara
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma

Introduction Dose adjusted (DA) EPOCH-R is an intensive outpatient infusional regimen, that incorporates intrathecal (IT) methotrexate to treat patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma including HIV associated aggressive B-cell lymphoma, double-hit lymphoma (DHL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) ineligible for intensive therapy, and gray zone lymphoma (GZL) with features in between BL and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We aimed to evaluate non-trial, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of Manitoba patients treated with DA-EPOCH-R, assess the role of prophylactic IT chemotherapy and toxicities. Methods Patients in MB approved to receive DA-EPOCH-R were identified through the CCMB Provincial Oncology Drug Program (PODP) database. Patients were included if they were older than 17 years, received at least 1 cycle of DA-EPOCH-R and with a diagnosis of HIV associated aggressive B-cell lymphoma, DHL, PMBCL, BL ineligible for more aggressive therapy, or GZL. All other diagnoses were excluded. Baseline demographic data, treatment characteristics, treatment responses, and treatment toxicity were collected. The primary endpoints of the study were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS was the time interval between the date of diagnosis to date of progression, last follow-up, or death from any cause. OS was the time interval between date of diagnosis to date of death by any cause, or last follow-up. The study was approved by the University of Manitoba Research Ethics Board and the CancerCare Manitoba Research Resource Impact Committee. Results A total of 40 patients were approved for DA-EPOCH-R between 2013 and 2019. 10 of these patients were excluded. 4 patients never received the therapy, 4 patients were treated in the relapsed setting, and 2 patients had histologies outside the inclusion criteria. Of the 30 patients included, 19 (63%) were male, 11 (37%) were female. The median age at diagnosis was 55 years (range 20-88). Our cohort was composed of DHL (n=9), triple hit lymphoma (THL, n=5), BL (n=4), GZL (n=3), and HIV-associated DLBCL (n=2). 87% (n=26) had advanced stage disease. By revised-IPI, 19 (63.3%) had poor prognosis (R-IPI ≥ 3). Response rate was 90%; CR 53.3% (n=16) and PR 37% (n=11). At a median follow-up of 25.3 months, the median PFS was 33.3 months and median OS was not reached. By histological subtype, median PFS was not reached in DHL, however THL, BL and PMBCL had worse median PFS (6.1, 8.4, and 5.6 months, respectively). Only 1 patient had CNS involvement at time of diagnosis. Of the patients with no documented CNS disease at presentation (n=29), none developed CNS involvement, including those who did not receive IT methotrexate. Median chemotherapy cycles per patient was 6 (range 1-6) and median IT treatment was 3 (range 0-6). 3 patients did not receive IT prophylaxis, and 2 stopped after 1 cycle due to intolerance. 56.7% (n=17) were able to undergo dose escalation beyond dose level 1, and 40% (n=T12) tolerated maximum dose level 3 or higher.77% of patients (n=23) experienced at least one adverse event of grade 3 or higher. 17 (57%) patients required blood transfusion at least once. 10 (33%) experienced neuropathy, 4 requiring vincristine dose reduction. 9 (30%) patients had febrile neutropenia complicating a total of 22 treatment cycles. 8 patients had grade 2-3 infectious complications. Conclusions While the real-world survival data for patients with DHL and HIV-associated lymphoma treated with DA-EPOCH-R are encouraging, those with THL, BL, and PMBCL did not attain durable response. Considering no patients (including those who did not receive IT chemotherapy) experienced CNS relapse, the role of IT chemotherapy needs to be further clarified. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Real-world practice patterns and outcomes in Veterans with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsu-Chih Chien ◽  
Deborah Morreall ◽  
Vikas Patil ◽  
Kelli M Rasmussen ◽  
Chunyang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Electronic Health Record Data ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Aim: To describe practices and outcomes in veterans with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients & methods: Using Veteran Affairs Cancer Registry System and electronic health record data, we identified relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients completing second-line treatment (2L) in 2000–2016. Treatments were classified as aggressive/nonaggressive. Analyses included descriptive statistics and the Kaplan–Meier estimation of progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: Two hundred and seventy patients received 2L. During median 9.7-month follow-up starting from 2L, 470 regimens were observed, averaging 2.7 regimens/patient: 219 aggressive, 251 nonaggressive. One hundred and twenty-one patients proceeded to third-line, 50 to fourth-line and 18 to fifth-line treatment. Median progression-free survival in 2L was 5.2 months. Median overall survival was 9.5 months. Forty-four patients (16.3%) proceeded to bone marrow transplant. Conclusion: More effective, less toxic treatments are needed and should be initiated earlier in treatment trajectory.

Survival Benefits of Patients with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Treated with Rituximab Combined with Chemotherapy.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4625-4625
Author(s):  
Zhixiang Shen ◽  
Junmin Li ◽  
Aihua Wang ◽  
Yu Chen
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Purpose: Rituximab combined with chemotherapy has been recommended as first-line or second-line standard regimen in most subtypes of B-cell lymphoma in China by the 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network lymphoma therapy guideline. We have conducted a multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in combination with standard chemotherapy (CHOP) in patients with previously untreated or relapsed indolent and aggressive NHL. Methods: Patients received 4–8 cycles of rituximab plus CHOP every 21 days. For each cycle, rituximab (375mg/m2) was given on day 1 and CHOP started on day 3. CHOP consisted of cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2, doxorubicin 50mg/m2, and vincristine 1.4mg/m2 (maximum 2mg/dose) given intravenously on day 3, and oral prednisone 100mg on days 3–7. Results: A total of 221 patients were enrolled on the trial, 128 males and 93 females with a mean age of 49 years (range 10–83 years). The main lymphoma subtypes were small lymphocytic (15 patients, 7%), follicular (27 patients, 12%), and diffuse large B-cell (160 patients, 72%). In total, 56 patients had indolent NHL and 165 aggressive NHL. The overall response rate for all patients was 86% with 57% complete responses. In patients with indolent NHL the overall and complete response rates were 95% and 55% respectively. After a median 12 months follow up, progression-free survival in patients with indolent NHL was 88%±5% at 1 year and 83%±6% at 2 years. In the 160 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the overall response rate was 88% with 61% complete responses, and after a mean follow-up of 6 months, predicted 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival were 88%±5% and 83%±7% respectively. Infusion-related adverse events occurred in 4% of patients, associated with the first infusion of rituximab. Subanalyses according to subtype, stage, IPI and other factors will be presented. Conclusion: Rituximab plus chemotherapy is an effective, well-tolerated treatment that achieves high response rates and long progression-free survival in both indolent and aggressive NHL.

Survival of Limited Stage Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Is Similar To Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2817-2817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry J. Savage ◽  
Mukesh Chhanabhai ◽  
Nicholas Voss ◽  
Shenkier Tamara ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Limited Stage ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) represent a heterogeneous group of diseases with an overall poor prognosis. Little information is available regarding the outcome of PTCL patients who present with limited stage disease. We sought to determine the outcome of PTCL patients presenting with limited disease in comparison with a cohort of patients with limited stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods: In a retrospective analysis we identified all patients with limited stage (non-bulky (<10cm) stage I/II disease no symptoms) PTCL diagnosed at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) between 1983 and 2004. Patients were excluded if they had cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (CutALCL) (n=13), NK/T-cell lymphoma nasal type (n=9) or primary CNS/ocular involvement (n=6). Results: Thirty-seven patients with PTCL were identified according to the World Health Organization Classification: ALK-neg ALCL 8 (22%); PTCL-unspecified (PTCLUS) 28 (78%); enteropathy associated TCL (EATL) 1 (3 %). The majority received CHOP-type chemotherapy (n=31, 86%), most with brief chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation (n=19, 61%). The 5 y OS and PFS was similar between PTCLUS and ALK-neg ALCL. There was no difference in survival between extranodal and nodal cases. The outcome of PTCL patients (including ALK-neg ALCL and PTCLUS) was compared to a cohort of limited stage DLBCL patients (excluding CNS/ocular lymphoma) (n=305) diagnosed over the same time period and treated similarly. There was no difference in 5 y OS or PFS (Figure 1,2). Interestingly, there were no late relapses observed in PTCLUS, in marked contrast to DLBCL. Conclusions: Limited stage PTCL is rare, however outcomes appear to be comparable to early stage DLBCL, supporting that they should be treated in a similar manner. Unlike limited stage DLBCL where late relapses occur, a plateau in the progression-free survival curve is observed, highlighting a distinct natural history for limited stage PTCL. Overall Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.18 Overall Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.18 Progression-Free Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.07 Progression-Free Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.07

Significance of c-myc Rearrangements in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2030-2030
Author(s):  
Philip Bierman ◽  
Fausto Loberiza ◽  
Bhavana Dave ◽  
Warren Sanger ◽  
R. Gregory Bociek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Abstract Rearrangements of the c-myc oncogene can be seen in 5–10% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, studies examining the significance of this finding have yielded conflicting results. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis to determine the clinical significance of c-myc rearrangements in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The results of classical cytogenetic studies and FISH analyses were used to identify diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cases in the database of the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group with or without c-myc rearrangements. Patients who were HIV positive and those with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease were excluded. We identified 16 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and c-myc rearrangements. All patients were initially treated with doxorubicin- or mitoxantrone-containing chemotherapy regimens. The median age of these 16 patients was 61 years (range 40 to 80), and 5 (31%) were males. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) was 0–2 at diagnosis in 9 patients (56%), and 3–5 in 7 patients (44%). Eleven patients (69%) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm) at diagnosis. No significant differences in outcome were identified when the 16 c-myc positive patients were compared with 97 c-myc negative diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in the same age range. The actuarial 5-year progression-free survival for the c-myc positive patients was 23% (95% CI 6% to 46%), as compared with 38% (95% CI 29% to 48%) for c-myc negative patients (p=0.17). The actuarial 5-year overall survival rates were 36% (95% CI 14% to 59%) and 47% (95% CI 36% to 56%), respectively (p=0.19). Classical cytogenetics and FISH analyses were also used to examine the 16 c-myc positive cases for bcl-2 rearrangements. Eight (50%) cases had rearrangements of bcl-2 in addition to c-myc rearrangements. These patients were similar to the c-myc positive/bcl-2 negative patients except for a higher likelihood of an elevated LDH level at diagnosis (88% vs. 25%; p=0.03). The actuarial 5-year progression-free survival for c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients was 0%, as compared to 33% (95% CI 6% to 66%) for patients with rearrangements of c-myc alone, and 37% (95% CI 28% to 47%) for c-myc negative patients. The actuarial 5-year overall survival rates were 12% (95% CI 1% to 42%), 47% (95% CI 12% to 76%), and 41% (95% CI 31% to 51%), respectively. A multivariate analysis, adjusting for IPI score, demonstrated that the relative risk (RR) of treatment failure was significantly worse for the c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients, as compared to the c-myc negative patients (RR 2.86, 95% CI 1.32–6.23; p=0.008). Similarly, mortality was also significantly worse for the c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients, as compared to the c-myc negative patients (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.18–6.11; p=0.02). In contrast, no significant differences in treatment failure or overall survival were demonstrated when c-myc positive/bcl-2 negative patients were compared with c-myc negative patients. Our results demonstrate that the c-myc rearrangement is not associated with poorer survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, patients with rearrangements of bcl-2 in addition to c-myc had significantly worse progression-free survival and overall survival.

The Impact of Activated Akt Expression On Clinical Outcome in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Clinicopathological Study of 99 Cases.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2676-2676
Author(s):  
Jung Yong Hong ◽  
Moon Ki Choi ◽  
Young Saing Kim ◽  
Chi Hoon Maeng ◽  
Su Jin Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Abstract 2676 Purpose Akt is a serine/threonine kinase that plays a central role in cell proliferation and growth. To define clinical impact of Akt expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL), we investigated the expression of phospho-Akt(p-Akt) in DLBCL and analyzed clinical impact of p-Akt expression on patient survival. Methods We evaluated the p-Akt expression in 99 DLBCL patients using tissue microarray(TMA) technology. Results Positive p-Akt expression was observed in 15.2% of the patients and significantly associated with elevated lactic dehydrogenase level (P = .044). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the patients with positive p-Akt expression showed substantially poorer overall survival (p-Akt+ vs p-Akt- 25.3 months [95% confidence interval(CI), 14.4–36.2 months] vs 192.6 months [95% CI, 131.3–253.9 months], P < .001) and progression-free survival (p-Akt+ vs p-Akt- 13.6 months[95% CI, 14.4–36.2 months] vs 134.5 months [95% CI, 131.3–253.9 months], P < .001), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with DLBCL with p-Akt positivity showed poorer overall survival with 3.2 fold (95% CI, 1.6–6.8, P = .002) risk for death compared to patients with DLBCL with p-Akt negativity. Conclusion Positive expression of p-Akt in DLBCL patients is associated with poorer overall and progression-free survival. Expression of p-Akt may act as an independent poor prognostic factor and might be a novel therapeutic target for DLBCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

FCgammaRIIa Polymorphism Is Not Associated with Overall Response, Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival In Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with Rituximab

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 5078-5078
Author(s):  
Marcelo Bellesso ◽  
Sergio Paulo Bydlowski ◽  
Renata Oliveira Costa ◽  
Felipe Vieira Rodrigues Maciel ◽  
Debora Levy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphoma Cell ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Abstract 5078 Background: Low-affinity receptor for the Fcγ region of immunoglobulin G (IgG) (FcγR) is constitutively expressed on resting human neutrophils. These receptor, termed FcγRIIa display biallelic polymorphism which have functional consequences with respect to binding and/or ingestion of targets opsonized by human IgG subclass antibodies. Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, an antigen found in most B-cell malignancies. Multiple mechanisms have been proposed for the activity of Rituximab, including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and a direct proapoptotic effect. F(ab′)2 Rituximab homodimers were shown to be effective in inducing apoptosis of B-cell lymphoma cell lines in vitro. Recently, it have been established that ADCC is important as predominant mechanism of lymphoma cell clearance and that Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) are critical for the in vivo actions of Rituximab in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). A genomic polymorphism at amino acid 131 of FcγRIIA has been described whereby the presence of Histidine (H) rather than Arginine is associated with responses to the CD20-directed immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) Rituximab among patients with indolent lymphoma. FcγRIIA genotype have been associated with a better clinical and molecular response in follicular lymphoma patients treated as first line therapy with Rituximab alone and in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with the concomitant administration of Rituximab and CHOP (R-CHOP). Methods: Here we analyzed the role of specific polymorphism of activating FcγRIIA in 64 patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP concerning prediction complete response (CR), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Results: The median age of the patients was 48.6 years. Out of the 64 patients (32%), were stage III-IV and 27 (42.5%) had more than 2 factors of the International Prognostic Index. Fity-six (89%) had CR and 7 (9.5%) had refractory disease (RD). Seven (11%) of the patients presented relapses. Deaths occurred in 6 (9.3%) patients with follow up of 19,5 months (range 21,3-50,1). The distribution of FcγRIIA polymorphism genotypes was: 15 (23,4%) HH, 30(46,9%) HR and 19(29,7%) RR, while considering only two groups (HH and R allele (HR and RR) was 15 (23,4%) and 49 (76,6%). There were no statistically significant differences in the genotypes groups according prognostic factors. In addition, there were not differences between response rate and FcγRIIA genotypes polymorphism: the CR in HH and HR/ RR were respectively 80% and 89%, p=0,377. It was not found differences regarding FcγRIIa. HH genotype presented a median PFS and OS. Thus, PFS HH genotype presented a median PFS 20,96 ± 10,49 months versus HR/RR median PFS 12,03 ± 7,71 months, p = 0,765, and OS 23,26 ± 10,42 months versus HR/ RR median OS 12,7 ± 7,42 months, p =0,98. Conclusions: Contrary to recent report we showed that FcγRIIA polymorphism is not associated to overall response, PFS and OS in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Is Interim/Mid-Treatment PET (interim PET, i-PET) Scan Predictive of Outcome in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma?.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2675-2675
Author(s):  
Dushyant Verma ◽  
Amol Takalkar ◽  
Runhua Shi ◽  
Glenn M. Mills ◽  
Srikanth Paladugu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Pet Scan ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Interim Pet ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Abstract 2675 Background: Initial treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) involves 6–8 cycles of chemo-immunotherapy and may be curative in 60–65% of patients. However, in the remaining patients, subsequent therapies appear inadequate for long lasting remission. A strategy to improve patient outcomes could involve early identification of patients who do not respond to treatment as expected and then employing different/aggressive treatment modalities in these patients. PET scan done during mid-treatment (interim PET, i-PET) may help identify these patients early. However, the value of i-PET in DLBCL is not established as there is controversy about its prognostic value and studies are ongoing to evaluate its benefit. Aims: To determine predictive value of i-PET on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) in DLBCL patients. Methods: We performed retrospective analysis of DLBCL patients treated at LSU Health Shreveport, LA, between Jan 2002 – July 2012. All patients were treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy. PET-CT was performed at baseline at time of diagnosis, after 2 to 4 courses (i-PET) and at the end of therapy (final PET, f-PET). Results: Forty-four patients were evaluable for analysis. The median age was 55 years (range 21–84), 32 (73%) were males. Ann-arbor staging showed 5 patients each in stage I and II, 11 patients in stage III, 23 in stage IV, and the median IPI score was 3. Median time to i-PET was after 3 cycles of chemotherapy, and median days to i-PET after chemotherapy were 16. The median follow-up duration from start of chemotherapy was 23 months (range 4 – 89). The PET results were as follows: i-PET negative 30 (68%), i-PET positive 14 (32%) patients. Final PET results were: f-PET negative 33 (75%), f-PET positive 11 (25%) patients. The 3-year PFS was 96.3% and 35.7% for i-PET negative versus positive patients respectively (p<0.001), and the 3-year PFS for f-PET negative versus positive patients was 78.9%% versus 30.0% respectively (p<0.001). The 3-year OS was 79.4% and 62.6% for i-PET negative versus positive patients respectively (p=0.3306). The 3-year OS was 79.9% and 58.7% for f-PET negative versus positive patients respectively (p=0.021). Conclusion: Interim/mid-treatment PET (i-PET) scan is predictive of progression free survival but not overall survival for DLBCL patients. A final PET (f-PET) scan is predictive of progression free survival as well as overall survival for DLBCL patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and could also look into the biology of i-PET positive patients by gene expressing profiling (GEP) and evaluate the role of novel agents in modifying the disease course. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document