A Pilot Study of Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells Mobilization with the Combination of Bortezomib and G-CSF in Multiple Myeloma and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1902-1902
Author(s):  
Divaya Bhutani ◽  
Vidya sri Kondadasula ◽  
Joseph P. Uberti ◽  
Voravit Ratanatharathorn ◽  
Lawrence G. Lum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Group A ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Group B ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Background: Bortezomib has become an integral part of front-line therapy of multiple myeloma in a large majority of patients. There are preliminary reports which show that addition of bortezomib can augment the peripheral blood CD34 count during stem cell mobilization. In this single center prospective trial we added bortezomib to G-CSF to evaluate the effects of bortezomib on peripheral CD34 counts and collection. Methods: Patients aged 18-70 years with diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) or non-hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) who were eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and had received no more than three prior chemotherapeutic regimens were eligible for the study. Patients were enrolled in two groups. Group A (N=3) received G-CSF 16mcg/kg for 5 days and proceeded to stem cell collection on D5 and then received bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on D5 after stem cell collection and G-CSF 16mcg/kg on D6, 7, 8 and repeat stem cell collection on D6, 7, 8 till the goal was achieved. Group B (N=17) received G-CSF 16mg/kg on D1-5 and received bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on D4 and proceeded to stem cell collection on D5. If the patient was not able to collect the predefined goal CD34, G-CSF was continued on D 6, 7, 8 and a second dose of bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 was given on D7. Mobilization procedure was stopped once the predefined goal CD34 collection (4 x 106/kg for MM and 2 x 106/kg for NHL) had been collected. Primary objectives of the study was to determine if addition of bortezomib to G-CSF will result in an increase in PBSCs by > 2-fold and to achieve median neutrophil engraftment 12 days post ASCT. Secondary objectiveswere to evaluate the collected product for co-mobilization of lymphoma or myeloma cells and to determine if the use of bortezomib increases the mobilization of immune-stimulatory Dendritic cell (DC) -1 subsets. Results: A total of 23 patients were enrolled and 20 were evaluable for the results. Only one patient with NHL was enrolled and rest had MM. Median age of pts was 57 years, M/F 8/12, median number of previous chemotherapy regimens was 1 (range 1-3). The median peripheral blood CD34 count pre and post bortezomib in all patients were 28.8 x 106/kg and 37 x 106/kg respectively. All three patients in group A had drop in peripheral blood CD34 counts on D6 post bortezomib as they had undergone stem cell collection on day 5. In part B (N=17), 15 patients had increase in peripheral blood CD 34+ve cell counts with 4 patients achieved doubling while 11 pts had less than doubling of peripheral blood CD34 count after receiving bortezomib. Two patients had minimal drop in the peripheral blood CD34 counts post bortezomib. Median number of CD34 cells collected in15 patients (part B) were 5.06 x 106 CD34 cells/kg (range 4-15.1). 18 patients proceeded to ASCT and median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC ≥500/cumm) post transplant was 12 days (range 11-16) and platelet engraftment (Plt count ≥ 20,000/cumm) was 18 days (range 15-27). There was no significant change in DC1/DC2 ratio in both groups following treatment with bortezomib and G-CSF (Figure 1). In group A all three patients collected goal CD34 count on day 5 and 2/3 patients collected >4 x106 CD34 cells/kg on D6 post bortezomib and1/3 patients collected 2.6 x 106 on D6 post bortezomib. In group B (n=17), 2 patients were unable to collect because of low CD34 counts on D4 and D5, 11 pts collected the goal in one day (D 5) and 4 pts required two days of apheresis (D 5 and 6). None of the patients received D7 bortezomib. Conclusion: Use of bortezomib during autologous stem cell collection was safe and well tolerated. Majority of patients had increase in peripheral blood CD34 counts post bortezomib administration on D4. Future trials should explore bortezomib as an alternate strategy to chemo-mobilization in combination with growth factors. Figure 1. DC1/DC2 ratio in group A and group B at various time points. Figure 1. DC1/DC2 ratio in group A and group B at various time points. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Off Label Use: Bortezomib for stem cell mobilization. Lum:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Equity Ownership; Transtarget.Inc: Equity Ownership. Deol:Bristol meyer squibb: Research Funding. Abidi:celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Research Funding.

Comparison of four different strategies of stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7039-7039
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Michael Sivik ◽  
Sesilya Whaley ◽  
Joseph Mierski ◽  
William J. Castellani ◽  
Mitzi Lowe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

7039 Background: There is no consensus among institutions for the optimal strategy of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: We retrospectively analysed the outcomes of PSBC collection in MM patients using the following mobilization regimens: cyclophosphamide 5,000 mg/m2 + etoposide 1,000 mg/m2 + G-CSF 5 mcg/Kg/day (Group A, n = 49); cyclophosphamide 2,000-3,000 mg/m2+ G-CSF 5 mcg/Kg/day (Group B, n = 25); G-CSF 16 mcg/Kg/day (Group C, n = 21); G-CSF 16 mcg/kg/day + plerixafor 0.24 mg/Kg (Group D, n = 128). Results: The median number of PBSC collected was 28.1 (range, 2.1-134), 4.5 (0.1-39.7), 4.0 (0-7.3) and 8.4 (0.2-41.2) million CD34+/kg in groups A, B, C and D, respectively (p <0.001). The mean number of collection days was 1.3, 2.2, 2.4, and 1.3 in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively (p <0.001). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 16 (32.7%), 1 (4%), 0, and 0 patients in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. One patient who received CTX 3 g/m2 died of septic shock during the neutropenic phase. Failure to collect PBSC, defined as <2x106 CD34+ cells/Kg for a planned single ASCT or <4x106 for planned tandem ASCTs, was observed in 2/49 (4%), 5/25 (20%), 4/21 (19%), and 9/128 (7%) patients in groups A, B, C, and D respectively (p=0.037). Conclusions: Plerixafor + G-CSF provided the greatest benefit to risk ratio for PSBC collection in MM patients.

scholarly journals G-CSF Plus Preemptive Plerixafor Versus Cyclophosphamide Plus G-CSF for Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Effectiveness, Safety and Cost Analysis

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5823-5823
Author(s):  
Ahmad Antar ◽  
Zaher Otrock ◽  
Mohamed Kharfan-Dabaja ◽  
Hussein Abou Ghaddara ◽  
Nabila Kreidieh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cell Yield ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Introduction: The optimal stem cell mobilization regimen for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) remains undefined. Most transplant centers use either a chemo-mobilization strategy using cyclophosphamide (CY) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or a steady state strategy using G-CSF alone or with plerixafor in case of mobilization failure. However, very few studies compared efficacy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness of stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide (CY) and G-CSF versus G-CSF with preemptive plerixafor. In this study, we retrospectively compared our single center experience at the American University of Beirut in 89 MM patients using fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF as our past preferred chemo-mobilization strategy in MM patients with our new mobilization strategy using G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor. The change in practice was implemented when plerixafor became available, in order to avoid CY associated toxicity. Patients and methods: Patients in the CY group (n=62) (Table 1) received either fractionated high-dose CY (n=56) (5g/m2 divided in 5 doses of 1g/m2 every 3 hours) or CY at 50mg/kg/day for 2 doses (n=6). G-CSF was started on day +6 of chemotherapy at a fixed dose of 300 µg subcutaneously every 12 hours. All patients in the plerixafor group (n=27) (Table 1) received G-CSF at a fixed dose of 300 µg subcutaneously every 12 hours daily for 4 days. On day 5, if peripheral blood CD34+ was ≥ 20/µl, apheresis was started immediately. Plerixafor (240 µg/kg) was given 7-11 hours before the first apheresis if CD34+ cell count on peripheral blood on day 5 was <20/µl and before the second apheresis if CD34+ cells on the first collect were <3х106/kg. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range: 1-3) in both groups. Results: Compared with plerixafor, CY use was associated with higher median peak peripheral blood CD34+ counts (35 vs 111 cells/µl, P= 0.000003), and total CD34+ cell yield (7.5 х 106 vs 15.9 х 106 cells/kg, P= 0.003). All patients in both groups collected ≥4x106 CD34+ cells/Kg. Moreover, 60 (96.7%) and 46 (74.2%) patients in the CY group vs 24 (88.8%) and 6 (22%) patients in the plerixafor group collected >6х106 and >10x106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively (P=0.16; P<0.00001). Only 4 (6.4%) patients required two apheresis sessions in the CY group compared to 11 (40%) in the plerixafor group (P=0.0001). Conversely, CY use was associated with higher frequency of febrile neutropenia (60% vs 0%; P<0.00001), blood transfusions (27% vs 0%; P<0.00001), platelets transfusion (25% vs 0%; P<0.00001) and hospitalizations (64% vs 0%; P<0.00001). No one required intensive level of care and all recovered. Autografting was successfully performed in all patients using high-dose melphalan with a median time from mobilization to the first transplant of 31 days (range: 16-156) in the CY group compared to 13 days (range: 8-40) in the plerixafor group (P=0.027); and median infused CD34+ cells were 7х106/kg (range: 3.1-15.3) versus 5.27 (2.6-7.45), respectively (P=0.002). The average total cost of mobilization using the adjusted costs based on National Social Security Fund (NSSF) prices in Lebanon in the plerixafor group was slightly higher compared with the CY group ($7964 vs $7536; P=0.16). Conclusions: Our data indicate robust stem cell mobilization in MM patients with either fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF or G-CSF alone with preemptive plerixafor. The chemo-mobilization approach was associated with two-fold stem cell yield, slightly lower cost (including cost of hospitalization) but significantly increased toxicity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) Does Not Impair Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization and Collection in Refractory/Relapsed CD30+ Lymphoma Patients Undergoing High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (HDC-ASCT)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3854-3854
Author(s):  
Manuel Afable ◽  
Paolo F. Caimi ◽  
Chitra Hosing ◽  
Marcos de Lima ◽  
Issa F. Khouri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Introduction. Salvage chemotherapy followed by HDC-ASCT is considered standard of care for chemosensitive patients who have relapsed after initial therapy. CD30 is commonly expressed in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) and in some cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Brentuximab vedotin (BV), an antibody-drug conjugate that targets CD30, induces high response rates and is now used in the salvage setting prior to HDC-ASCT. It is not clear if BV use peri-mobilization would influence mobilization and collection of autologous CD34+ stem cells. We therefore examined 42 patients who were treated with BV prior to HDC-ASCT. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the HDC-ASCT databases of University Hospitals Case Medical Center (UHCMC) and MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) and identified 42 patients who were treated with BV prior to HDC-ASCT between February 2009 and April 2014. The median age was 37 years (range, 18-67) and 52% (n=22) were male. Diagnoses were HL (n=30; 71%;), and NHL (n=12; 29%; anaplastic large cell, n=6; diffuse large B-cell, n=3; unknown subtype, n=3). Median times from diagnosis to transplant, from initial BV treatment to transplant and from last BV treatment to stem cell collection were: 21 months (range, 10-210), 5 months (range, 1.5-16.8), and 30 days (range, 2-280), respectively. Our subjects had failed multiple conventional treatments with a median of 3 (range, 2–8) lines of treatment before HDC-ASCT; 38% (n=16) received involved field radiation therapy. BV was given at 1.8 mg/kg IV every 21 days. Median number of BV cycles was 4 (range, 1-16) and the overall response rate to treatment was 71% (CR 55% + PR 16%). Thirty patients (71%) were in complete remission (CR) at the time of transplant (CR2 = 6; CR≥3 = 24), 4 (10%) were in partial remission (PR) (PR2 = 1; PR≥3 = 3), 6 patients (14%) had stable disease and 2 patients (5%) were transplanted with progressive disease. Stem cell collection target was 5 x 106 CD34+ cells/Kg. Mobilization regimens used were chemotherapy/G-CSF-based in 32 patients (76%) and Plerixafor/G-CSF-based in 10 patients (24%). Use of chemotherapy/G-CSF in first mobilization was standard at MDACC, whereas plerixafor/G-CSF was used as first mobilization at UHCMC. Results. Thirty-nine (92.8%) of 42 patients were successfully mobilized on the first attempt. Second mobilization was required in 3 cases (7.1%). Second mobilization regimens included Cyclophosphamide/G-CSF (n=2) and Plerixafor/G-CSF (n=1). The median number of infused CD34+ cells was 5.46 x106/kg (range, 1.65-54.78 x106/kg). All patients engrafted neutrophils and platelets at a median time of 10 days (range, 9-13), and 10.5 days (range, 7-35), respectively. The median time to RBC transfusion independence was 8 days (0-34). With a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 0–63), day 100 treatment-related mortality was 0%. The one-year actuarial event-free and overall survival is 50.5% and 84.1%, respectively. Conclusion. Within the limitations of this retrospective study, BV before HDC-ASCT did not adversely affect peripheral blood stem cell mobilization, collection and engraftment in a cohort of heavily pre-treated, relapsed/refractory patients with CD30+ lymphomas. Disclosures Caimi: Seattle Genetics: Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Bortezomib in Combination with Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2067-2067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhausaheb Bagal ◽  
Anant Gokarn ◽  
Avinash Bonda ◽  
Swapnil Chavan ◽  
Sachin Punatar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Cell Yield ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cell Harvest

Abstract Background: Proteasome inhibitors (PI) have become integral part of front-line treatment of multiple myeloma. Murine model experiments have shown mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow to peripheral blood after PI administration via down regulation of very late antigen 4 (VLA-4) which mediate adherence of hematopoietic stem cells to the bone marrow microenvironment via interaction with vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1). Human studies with bortezomib in combination with G-CSF for mobilization have yielded encouraging results with no additional toxicity and no malignant plasma cell mobilization was observed. Cyclophosphamide based chemo-mobilization offers advantage in term of higher stem cell yield and is able to overcome adverse impact of prior lenalidomide therapy on stem cell harvest. In the current study we added bortezomib to cyclophosphamide-GCSF (B-Cy-GCSF) chemo-mobilization regimen to study the effect of bortezomib on stem cell harvest and compared this with our earlier protocol of only cyclophosphamide-GCSF (Cy-GCSF) mobilization. Methods: Patients of multiple myeloma aged between 18 to 70 years were eligible for the study in the period between March 2016- June 2018. Patients after induction therapy achieving at least partial response and having no more than grade 1 peripheral neuropathy were enrolled. Patients received bortezomib at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 on day 1, 4, 8 and 11 and cyclophosphamide (Cy) was administered at a dose of 1 g/m2 on day 8 and 9 followed by G-CSF 10µg/kg in two divided doses from day 11 onwards till target stem cell collection of at least 5 X 106/Kg. The peripheral blood CD34 (PB CD34) counts were monitored from day 14 and harvest was initiated when it reached above 20 cells/µL. The peak PB CD34 count achieved, the number of days of harvest required, the CD34 dose yield and the engraftment kinetics were recorded and compared with earlier patients who had undergone Cy-GCSF chemo-mobilization. These patients had received Cy 1 g/m2 on d1 and d2, G-CSF 10 mcg/kg from d4 onwards and PBCD34 monitored from d7 onwards. Result: A total of 37 patients were enrolled between March 2016 and June 2018. Median age of study cohort was 46 years (range 27-63) and 27 (73 %) were males. Median lines of therapy received were 1 (range 1 to 2) and 8 (21.6 %) had received lenalidomide prior to stem cell harvest. The median peak peripheral blood CD34 cell counts 71.3 cells /µL (range 27.5 -306). Median CD34 cells collected were 9.21 X 106 /Kg (range 4.95-17.1). Target CD34 cell collection was achieved after a median of one day harvest (range 1-2). Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 11.5 and 13.5 days respectively. These results were compared with 88 patients who had undergone Cy-GCSF chemo-mobilization earlier at our center from May 2008 till February 2016 as seen in Table1 . In Cy- G-CSF cohort, median number of harvest required for target CD34 was 2 (range 1-4) and median CD34 cell yield was 8.2 X 106/Kg (0.4-24.2). Target CD34 cells yield of 5 X 106/Kg was achieved with single apheresis in 58.6% of patients after B-Cy-GCSF mobilization as compared to 44.3% in Cy-G-CSF group, although this was not statistically significant (p=0.1). While 3(3.4 %) had failed chemo-mobilization after Cy-GCSF, none of patients in bortezomib group had mobilization failure. Conclusion: Patients undergoing B-Cy-GCSF mobilization have higher stem cell yield and required less days of harvest. This strategy should be explored in a larger cohort of patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Successful Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells After Intensive Bendamustine Pre-Treatment In Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4439-4439
Author(s):  
Wolfram Pönisch ◽  
Julia Wiesler ◽  
Sabine Leiblein ◽  
Elvira Edel ◽  
Haifa K. Al-Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Ortho Biotech ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 4439 Introduction The alkylating agent bendamustine has structural similarities to both alkylating agents and purine analogs, and is effective in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. So far, no data are available on stem cell toxicity or on stem cell mobilization. Since autologous stem cell transplantation is an established treatment for multiple myeloma after primary treatment, we were interested in analysing the experience of stem cell mobilization after bendamustine treatment. Material and Methods A retrospective analysis over a period of fifteen years was carried out in 56 (34 male and 22 female) patients with multiple myeloma after bendamustine pretreatment at the university hospitals Leipzig and Heidelberg. Patients had a median age of 58 (range 31–72) years. The median number of cycles was 3 (range 1–10) and the cumulative bendamustine dose ranged from 120 to 2400 mg/qm. The mobilization regimen in 37 cases was either cyclophosphamide 4 g/qm (n=33) or 7 g/qm (n=4) followed by G-CSF (2×5 ug/kg s.c.). Alternative regimens such as CAD, CED, TCED and others were used for mobilization in the remaining 19 patients. Apheresis was started as soon as peripheral blood CD34+ counts exceeded 10×106/l with a harvest target of 4×106 CD34+/kg using 4 times the blood volume. The minimal accepted target was 2×106 CD34+/kg. Results Stem cell harvest was successful in 54 of the 56 patients. In one patient the peripheral blood CD34+ cell count failed to reach 10 × 106/l and no apheresis was performed. In one further patient a rapid decrease in peripheral blood CD34+ counts resulted in insufficient recovery of stem cells in the apheresis product. In 18 out of 54 patients (33%) the target was reached with a single apharesis. The median number of aphareses in the 54 patients was 2 (range 1–7) and the median CD34+ cell-count obtained was 5.5 (range 1.7–20.4) × 106/kg. Engraftment was successful in 52/53 patients receiving a stem cell transplant. One patient was successfully harvested and did not receive the transplant yet. Conclusion From this retrospective analysis we conclude that mobilization of PBSC is possible after intensive bendamustine pretreatment. Disclosures: Niederwieser: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Goldschmidt:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ortho Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Chugai Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

A Risk Adapted Approach Utilizing Plerixafor in Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3211-3211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Micallef ◽  
Stephen M Ansell ◽  
Francis Buadi ◽  
David Dingli ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Group A ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Group B

Abstract Abstract 3211 Poster Board III-148 Although autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has become standard of care for many patients with hematologic malignancies, many patients fail to collect a minimum number of CD34 + stem cells to support high dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Recently, plerixafor, a CXCR4 antagonist, was FDA approved for use in combination with G-CSF for autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with NHL or Multiple Myeloma. In February 2009, we commenced a risk adapted approach to the utilization of plerixafor. The study was restricted to patients mobilized with GCSF alone and patients undergoing chemotherapy primed PBSC mobilization were excluded. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization was commenced with G-CSF at 10 mcg/kg/day. On day 4, a peripheral blood (PB) CD34 count was measured. For patients whose PB CD34 was ≥10/μL, apheresis was commenced the following morning. For patients whose PB CD34 was <10/μL, it was measured again on day 5; if ≥10/μL then apheresis was commenced the following morning. If PB CD34 was <10/μL on day 5, plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg sc) was administered on the evening of day 5 and apheresis was commenced the following day (Group A). In addition, during apheresis, for patients whose collection yield was < 0.5 × 106 CD34/kg, in the absence of instrument failure or problems with the collection procedure, plerixafor was added (Group B). Morning administration of G-CSF and evening dosing of plerixafor continued daily until apheresis was complete. From February to July 2009, 174 mobilization attempts occurred; 27 with chemotherapy and 147 with cytokines alone. The 147 pts who underwent mobilization with cytokines alone are presented here. The underlying diagnosis was as follows: Myeloma 61 pts, NHL 54 pts, Amyloid 17 pts, Hodgkin 10 pts, POEMS 4 pts and 1 pt with a solid tumor. For the entire group the median number of CD34 cells collected was 5.5 × 106 CD34/kg (range 0.1-17). The median number of apheresis was 3 (range 1-12). 67 patients (46%) received plerixafor; 37 patients started plerixafor during mobilization (Group A) and 30 patients during collections due to a poor yield (Group B). 12 pts of the 37 received plerixafor on day 4 because of prior mobilization failure or high risk of mobilization failure and are included in Group A. Table 1 outlines the details of mobilization and collection by groups. By disease category, of the 61 patients with MM, 28 (46%) received plerixafor (8 Group A and 20 Group B). Median apheresis in all the MM pts was 2 (range 1-12) with a total of 6.8 × 106 CD34/kg (2.2-16.7). In the 54 NHL pts, 32 (59%) received plerixafor (24 Group A and 8 Group B). Median apheresis for all pts with NHL was 3 (range 1-7) with a total of 4.6 × 106 CD34/kg (range 0-11.4). Overall, only 7 of 147 (5%) mobilization attempts failed to achieve a minimum of 2 × 106 CD34/kg. This compares to a 22% failure rate prior to institution of this risk adapted approach. In conclusion, implementing this risk adapted approach allows poor mobilizers to be identified promptly and for plerixafor to be initiated during mobilization and collection, thereby reducing the number of mobilization failures. In patients who predictably would not have successful collection based on a PB CD34 <10/μL, addition of plerixafor results in a majority of patients achieving an adequate collection. This risk adapted approach may be more cost effective than reattempting mobilization after a prior failure or utilizing combination G-CSF and plerixafor for upfront mobilization. Table 1. Mobilization and Collection data. All patients N=147 Group A1 N=37 Group B2 N=30 No Plerixafor N=80 PB CD34 day 4     Median 11 0 7 19     Range 0-331 0-7 0-32 0-331 PB CD34 day 5     Median 10 4.5 12 15     Range 0-51 2-9 11-23 9-51 Apheresis Yield     Median 5.5 4.4 6.0 6.2     Range 0.1-17 3.1-12.7 3.0-12.2 2-17 Number of Apheresis     Median 3 3 5 2     Range 1-12 1-7 4-12 1-8 Days of Plerixafor     Median n/a 3 2 n/a     Rang 1-7 1-8 1 Group A – Plerixafor initiated prior to apheresis 2 Group B – Plerixafor initiated during apheresis Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Cytokine Administration Sites for Mobilization of Peripheral Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells for Patients with Hematological Malignancies Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4230-4230
Author(s):  
Heather Renfroe ◽  
Edmund K. Waller ◽  
Mike Arnold ◽  
Louette Vaughn ◽  
R. Donald Harvey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Injection Site ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Blood Stem Cells ◽  
Group A ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Group B

Abstract Abstract 4230 Background The optimal injection site for cytokine administration when used to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells for collection is unclear. There are known differences in the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously injected drugs based upon site adiposity. We hypothesized that injection in lower adipose-tissue-containing sites in the extremities would result in a reduced reservoir effect leading to lower exposures of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and therefore reduced stem cell collection following cytokine mobilization. Methods We completed a prospective single institution IRB-approved randomized study to determine the efficiency and tolerability of different injection sites among patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma undergoing stem cell mobilization and apheresis. The primary end-points were the total number of CD34+ cells collected and the number of days of apheresis required to collect target numbers (5 × 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg for patients with lymphoma; 10 × 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg for patients with myeloma). Forty patients were randomized to receive cytokine injections in their abdomen (group A) or extremities (group B). Randomization was stratified based upon diagnosis (myeloma; N=29 vs. lymphoma; N=11), age (≤50; N=13 vs. >50; N=27), and mobilization strategy (cytokines alone; N=27 vs. chemomobilization; N=13). Both group A and B were balanced with respect to the stratification criteria. Filgrastim was planned at a dose of 10 ug/kg/day for patients undergoing chemomobilization or 15 ug/kg/day for patients undergoing cytokine-only mobilization. Actual mean cytokine doses were 11.78 ug/kg/day using chemomobilization and 12.96 ug/kg/day using cytokines alone due to rounding to nearest vial size. Patients recorded the injection site for G-CSF and symptoms daily. Results Of those enrolled, 90% were evaluable with 18 patients in each group. Four were deemed non-evaluable due to failure to proceed to the planned mobilization procedure (1 in group A and 2 in group B) or lack of consistent injection site (1 patient). In addition, one patient in group B received a non-protocol specified injection of plerixafor due to poor mobilization and collected a total of 13.62 × 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg in 2 days of apheresis. Among the 36 evaluable subjects, 1 subject in each group failed collection with a total of < 2.0 × 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg collected. Mean BMI at the time of mobilization was not different between groups A and B (27.25 ± 4.7 versus 29.39 ± 5.7, respectively; p=NS). Mean numbers of CD34+ cells (±SD) collected were not different between groups A and B (9.15 ± 4.7 versus 9.85 ± 5 × 106/kg, respectively; p=NS). The mode and median duration of apheresis was 2 days for both groups. Subjects from both groups reported similar toxicities of pain and discomfort at the injection site. Conclusions Based upon the analysis, G-CSF administration site (extremities versus abdomen), does not affect the number of CD34+ cells collected by apheresis or the duration of apheresis needed to reach the target cell dose. Disclosures: Lonial: Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gloucester: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Impact of Plerixafor Use at Different Peripheral Blood CD34+ Thresholds on Autologous Stem Cell Collection in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 876-883
Author(s):  
Eshana E. Shah ◽  
Rebecca P. Young ◽  
Sandy W. Wong ◽  
Lloyd E. Damon ◽  
Jeffrey L. Wolf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

No Influence of Previous Thalidomide Administration on Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4902-4902
Author(s):  
Iris Breitkreutz ◽  
Axel Benner ◽  
Friedrich W. Cremer ◽  
Doris Herrmann ◽  
Anthony D. Ho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract OBJECTIVES: In a joint study of the GMMG and HOVON groups, induction therapy with Thalidomide (Thal), doxorubicin and dexamethasone (TAD) is currently investigated in comparison with vincristin, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) followed by mobilisation therapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (CAD) and peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC). Munshi et al. (Blood 1999, Abstract #2577) described a dampening of PBSC-mobilisation by Thal treatment. We therefore investigated a possible influence of PBSC after previous Thal administration. METHODS: Altogether, data on 112 patients were analyzed in terms of PBSC-mobilisation. 56 patients were randomized up-front to receive 3 cycles of TAD (Thal 400mg/d orally; doxorubicin 9mg/m2/d, 4 30-min. infusions, day 1–4; dexamethasone 480mg total dose orally). 56 patients received VAD (vincristin 0,4mg/d and doxorubicin 9mg/m2/d, 4 30-min. infusions, day 1–4.; dexamethasone 480mg total dose orally) followed by mobilisation with CAD (cyclophosphamide 1g/m2/d, 1h infusion, day 1; doxorubicin 15mg/m2/d, 4 short infusions, day 1–4; dexamethasone 160mg total dose orally) and G-CSF (Neupogen 600mg/d s.c. or Granocyte 526mg/d s.c., day 5 after the end of chemotherapy until PBSC). Thal was stopped two weeks before CAD. Low dose heparine was administered to prevent deep venous thromboses in the TAD group. RESULTS: The median time was 14 days after the first day of CAD until PBSC in patients in both the TAD (range 12–18 days) and VAD group (range 10–19 days). In the first leukapheresis, a median total PBSC yield of 8,1x106/kg CD34+ cells in the TAD/CAD (range 0,3–34x106 CD34+ cells) and 8,7x106/kg CD34+ cells in the VAD/CAD (range 0,5–30x106 CD34+ cells) group could be harvested (p=0.31). In the best leukapheresis, a median total PBSC yield of 8,1x106/kg CD34+ cells in the TAD/CAD (range 0,7–34x106 CD34+ cells) and 8,9x106/kg CD34+ cells in the VAD/CAD (range 2–30x106 CD34+ cells) group could be reached (p=0.24). CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found in stem cell collection and yield after TAD versus VAD. Thalidomide as a part of induction therapy does not seem to have an influence of the peripheral blood stem cell collection of patients with multiple myeloma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document