scholarly journals Acute toxicity and first clinical results of intensive postinduction therapy using a modified busulfan and cyclophosphamide regimen with autologous bone marrow rescue in first remission of acute myeloid leukemia [see comments]

Blood ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 1507-1516 ◽  
Author(s):  
DW Beelen ◽  
K Quabeck ◽  
U Graeven ◽  
HG Sayer ◽  
HK Mahmoud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Preparative Regimen ◽  
First Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract The combination of high-dose busulfan (16 mg/kg) and 200 mg/kg cyclophosphamide is gaining increasing significance as a preparative regimen prior to autologous, syngeneic, or allogeneic marrow transplantation. A new regimen of high-dose busulfan in conjunction with a reduced dose of 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide has recently been described as a preparative regimen prior to allogeneic transplantation. To determine the drug-related nonhematologic toxic effects of this new regimen without confounding factors associated with allogeneic transplantation, we conducted a pilot study using this new regimen in 20 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission prior to autologous unpurged marrow transplantation. All patients experienced transient non-life-threatening acute drug-related toxicity with skin reactions in 20 (100%), nausea and vomiting in 20 (100%), oral mucositis in 18 (90%), hepatic functional impairment in 17 (85%), hemorrhagic cystitis in three (15%), and generalized seizures in two (10%) of these patients, respectively. Two procedural, fatal complications resulted from infectious causes that were not directly related to the speed of hematopoietic reconstitution or the toxicity of the preparative regimen. The 3-year event-free survival estimate (55% +/- 11%) and probability of leukemic recurrence (38% +/- 11%) attained with this new regimen in recipients of autografts in first remission of AML are promising and challenge comparisons with preparative regimens employing combinations of cytotoxic agents or total body irradiation (TBI).

scholarly journals Acute toxicity and first clinical results of intensive postinduction therapy using a modified busulfan and cyclophosphamide regimen with autologous bone marrow rescue in first remission of acute myeloid leukemia [see comments]

Blood ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 1507-1516
Author(s):  
DW Beelen ◽  
K Quabeck ◽  
U Graeven ◽  
HG Sayer ◽  
HK Mahmoud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Preparative Regimen ◽  
First Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid

The combination of high-dose busulfan (16 mg/kg) and 200 mg/kg cyclophosphamide is gaining increasing significance as a preparative regimen prior to autologous, syngeneic, or allogeneic marrow transplantation. A new regimen of high-dose busulfan in conjunction with a reduced dose of 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide has recently been described as a preparative regimen prior to allogeneic transplantation. To determine the drug-related nonhematologic toxic effects of this new regimen without confounding factors associated with allogeneic transplantation, we conducted a pilot study using this new regimen in 20 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission prior to autologous unpurged marrow transplantation. All patients experienced transient non-life-threatening acute drug-related toxicity with skin reactions in 20 (100%), nausea and vomiting in 20 (100%), oral mucositis in 18 (90%), hepatic functional impairment in 17 (85%), hemorrhagic cystitis in three (15%), and generalized seizures in two (10%) of these patients, respectively. Two procedural, fatal complications resulted from infectious causes that were not directly related to the speed of hematopoietic reconstitution or the toxicity of the preparative regimen. The 3-year event-free survival estimate (55% +/- 11%) and probability of leukemic recurrence (38% +/- 11%) attained with this new regimen in recipients of autografts in first remission of AML are promising and challenge comparisons with preparative regimens employing combinations of cytotoxic agents or total body irradiation (TBI).

Randomized Phase II Study of Clofarabine-Based Consolidation for Younger Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Remission

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1223-1230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Thomas ◽  
Stéphane de Botton ◽  
Sylvie Chevret ◽  
Denis Caillot ◽  
Emmanuel Raffoux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Nonhematologic Toxicity ◽  
Donor Identification ◽  
First Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a clofarabine-based combination (CLARA) versus conventional high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) as postremission chemotherapy in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods Patients age 18 to 59 years old with intermediate- or unfavorable-risk AML in first remission and no identified donor for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) were eligible. Two hundred twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive three CLARA or three HDAC consolidation cycles. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS). To handle the confounding effect of SCT that could occur in patients with late donor identification, hazard ratios (HRs) of events were adjusted on the time-dependent treatment × SCT interaction term. Results At 2 years, RFS was 58.5% (95% CI, 49% to 67%) in the CLARA arm and 46.5% (95% CI, 37% to 55%) in the HDAC arm. Overall, 110 patients (55 in each arm) received SCT in first remission. On the basis of a multivariable Cox-adjusted treatment × SCT interaction, the HR of CLARA over HDAC before or in absence of SCT was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.98; P = .041). In a sensitivity analysis, when patients who received SCT in first remission were censored at SCT time, 2-year RFS was 53.3% (95% CI, 39% to 66%) in the CLARA arm and 31.0% (95% CI, 19% to 43%) in the HDAC arm (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.98; P = .043). Gain in RFS could be related to the lower cumulative incidence of relapse observed in the CLARA arm versus the HDAC arm (33.9% v 46.4% at 2 years, respectively; cause-specific HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.94; P = .025). CLARA cycles were associated with higher hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity than HDAC cycles. Conclusion These results suggest that CLARA might be considered as a new chemotherapy option in younger patients with AML in first remission.

New Strategies for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Including Antibodies and Other Novel Agents

Hematology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin S. Tallman
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Multidrug Resistance ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Farnesyltransferase Inhibitors ◽  
Younger Adults ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract The prognosis for younger adults (≤ 55–60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has improved during the last four decades. However, there has been little progress in the treatment of older adults. This disappointing observation is important because the median age of patients with AML is about 70 years. Approximately 60%–80% of younger adults with AML achieve complete remission (CR) with the cytotoxic agents cytarabine and an anthracycline such as daunorubicin or idarubicin or the anthracenedione mitoxantrone. However, only 30%–40% of such patients are alive and disease-free at 5 years. Among older adults, CR is achieved in 40%–55%, but there are very few long-term survivors. Many studies have evaluated the impact of alternative doses and schedules, as well as additional cytotoxic drugs, on the prognosis for this group of patients. The outcome has not improved substantially beyond that achieved with conventional doses of an anthracycline and cytarabine followed by high-dose cytarabine consolidation. Several factors identified at diagnosis can predict outcome. The most important of these is the karyotype of the leukemic cells. Another critical factor is the presence of transmembrane transporter proteins, which confer multidrug resistance and mutations in or overexpression of specific genes such as WT1, C/EBPα, BAX, and BCL-2/BAX ratio, BAALC, EVI1, KIT and FLT3. The development of specific agents directed at gene mutations, signal transduction pathways and unique cell surface antigens provide the foundation for new therapeutic strategies. Such agents include the immunoconjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin, multidrug resistance inhibitors, farnesyltransferase inhibitors, histone deacetylase and proteosome inhibitors, antiangiogenesis agents, FLT3 inhibitors, apoptosis inhibitors, and nucleoside analogs. All of these agents can potentially address the heterogeneous abnormalities in AML and significantly improve the outcome for patients.

Randomized Study of Decitabine Versus Observation or Continued Cytotoxic Chemotherapy in Patients with Intermediate and Poor Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First or Subsequent Complete Remission.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2859-2859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Jean-Pierre Issa ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Mary Hood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Clin Oncol ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract The role of maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unclear. Continued therapy with cytotoxic agents similar to those used for induction and consolidation is associated with toxicity but can improve disease free survival (DFS). (Buchner T, J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2480 and Lowenberg B, J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:872) Immune modulation in this setting may also be effective in prolonging DFS.(Brune M, Blood2006;108:88). Methylation status of tumor suppressor genes in clinical remission predicts the relapse risk in AML with earlier relapse in patients with increased DNA promotor methylation.(Agrawal S, Cancer Res. 2007;67:1370) Therefore, hypomethylating therapy may be effective in maintaining remission and prolonging survival in these patients. We are conducting a clinical trial comparing decitabine to cytotoxic chemotherapy or observation in patients with AML in their first or subsequent complete remission (CR). Patients with non-favorable risk AML (including intermediate and poor risk) receive induction therapy with idarubicin and high dose cytarabine followed by at least 2 cycles of cytarabine based consolidation. They are then stratified by age (≤ 60 vs. > 60) and cytogenetics (intermediate vs. poor risk) and randomized to receive decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV daily × 5 every 4 to 8 weeks for 12 cycles, or to continue chemotherapy/observation. Patients in > first CR are randomized after completion of salvage therapy. Serial samples for methylation studies and determination of minimal residual disease by flow cytometry are collected. To date, 19 (8 M, 11 F) patients with AML (including 14 in first CR and 5 in subsequent CR) have been enrolled onto the study. Median age of the patients is 56 years (range 31 – 74). Fourteen patients are ≤ 60 years. Cytogenetics at diagnosis was intermediate in 10 patients, poor-risk in 8 patients, and favorable [inv(16)] in one relapsed patient. Eight patients were randomized to decitabine and have received a median of 3 cycles (range 1 – 6). Eleven patients were randomized to observation/continued therapy and all, except 2 patients, have received further cytarabine based therapy after consolidation. With a median duration of follow up for the entire group of 5 months (range 1 – 9), 7/8 patients on the decitabine arm and 9/11 patients on the other arm have remained in remission. Toxicity in the decitabine treated patients was limited to 4 episodes of grade 3 neutropenia, 2 episode of grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and 1 episodes of grade 3 anemia. All of these cytopenias were short in duration and reversed without any associated adverse events. We conclude that administration of decitabine in CR at the above schedule/dose is safe and well tolerated.

scholarly journals FLT3 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: what is the best approach in 2013?

Hematology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (1) ◽  
pp. 220-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Levis
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Flt3 Mutation ◽  
Flt3 Mutations ◽  
Flt3 Inhibitors ◽  
First Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Patients with acute myeloid leukemia who harbor an FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutation present several dilemmas for the clinician. The results of an FLT3 mutation test, which can be influenced by several variables, need to be interpreted according to the clinical setting and there is a need for internationally standardized FLT3 mutation assays. Because of the lack of prospective studies, the role of allogeneic transplantation as consolidation therapy is still somewhat controversial, but the preponderance of evidence suggests that transplantation in first remission, if possible, is probably the best option. Clinically useful FLT3 inhibitors are hopefully on the near horizon and are being studied in the context of current treatment paradigms.

High-Dose Mercaptopurine and Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine During First Remission of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-126
Author(s):  
Cengiz Canpolat ◽  
Sima Jeha ◽  
Sharon Lockhart ◽  
Irma Ramirez ◽  
Theodore Zipf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
First Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Intermediate Dose
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document