scholarly journals Clinical manifestations of, diagnostic approach to, and treatment of neurolymphomatosis in the rituximab era

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1379-1387
Author(s):  
Arushi Khurana ◽  
Mattia Novo ◽  
Grzegorz S. Nowakowski ◽  
Kay M. Ristow ◽  
Robert J. Spinner ◽  
...  

Abstract Neurolymphomatosis (NL) is a rare manifestation of lymphoma, with limited evidence for optimal management. The largest patient series, 50 cases of lymphoma and leukemia, was published in 2010 with limited rituximab exposure. This study aims to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnostic testing, and outcomes of NL in the rituximab era. Forty biopsy-proven cases of NL, in association with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), at the Mayo Clinic were retrospectively evaluated. B-cell NHL was associated with 97% of NL cases, of which diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most common (68%). Primary NL, defined as neural involvement present at the time of diagnosis of lymphoma, was noted in 52% cases. Seventy percent of patients presented with sensorimotor weakness and neuropathic pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was positive in 100% patients. Overall survival (OS) was significantly better for primary NL and NL associated with indolent lymphomas. Relapses were seen in 60% (24/40) of patients; 75% involved the peripheral or central nervous system at relapse. The use of rituximab in the frontline setting significantly impacted progression-free survival (PFS). Transplant consolidation was noted to be associated with improved OS. This study adds to the available literature on NL in the rituximab era. The overall outcomes have improved in recent years. In our experience, MRI and positron emission tomography/computed tomography may be required for accurate assessment of the extent of disease involvement and identification of an optimal biopsy site. The use of rituximab was associated with improvement in PFS, and autologous stem cell transplant was associated with OS.

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley D. Staton ◽  
Jonathon B. Cohen

Double-hit lymphomas have concurrent rearrangements of CMYC and BCL2 or occasionally BCL6. Although double-hit lymphomas are a part of the mature B-cell lymphoma lineage, they have an aggressive clinical course that is complicated by an extremely poor response to standard therapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Overall survival is short for many patients with double-hit lymphomas, which reinforces the importance of identifying appropriate therapies for these patients. Fortunately, recent reports have demonstrated improved outcomes with the use of intensive induction therapies. This article discusses the biology, therapeutic considerations, treatment opinions, possible role of autologous stem-cell transplant, and need for ongoing clinical trials for this subgroup of patients with lymphoma.


2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 2319-2327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yngvild N. Blaker ◽  
Marianne B. Eide ◽  
Knut Liestøl ◽  
Grete F. Lauritzsen ◽  
Arne Kolstad ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1279-1279
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Matasar ◽  
Coral L. Atoria ◽  
Elena B. Elkin ◽  
Chadi Nabhan

Abstract Background: The introduction of rituximab has improved outcomes in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (BCL) across all histologies. Extended use of rituximab, or maintenance rituximab, improves progression-free survival in follicular lymphoma (FL) patients who achieve a response to induction rituximab with or without chemotherapy, but there is no evidence of an overall survival benefit. There is currently little evidence to support extended use of rituximab in other histologic subgroups, and older patients in particular may be at risk of adverse events. Our objective was to characterize patterns and predictors of extended rituximab therapy in a population-based cohort of older BCL patients in the United States. Methods: In the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare dataset,we identified patients 66 years and older diagnosed with BCL in 2000-2010. Histology was classified as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), Burkitt lymphoma (BL), FL, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), other indolent BCL, and BCL not otherwise specified (NOS). We identified Medicare claims for rituximab starting at any point following diagnosis. Extended rituximab therapy was defined as a duration of greater than 7 months with no gap in rituximab claims greater than 6 months. Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with extended rituximab were evaluated in multivariable logistic regression. Results: There were 24,232 BCL patients who received rituximab during the study period. The cohort was predominantly white (91%), half were men, 15% had a Charlson comorbidity score ≥2, and 12% were 85 years or older. DLBCL was the most common histology (44%), followed by FL (21%), other indolent BCL (17%), BCL-NOS (13%), MCL (6%), and BL (1%). Overall, most patients (85%) received rituximab for ≤7 months, but duration varied by histology (Table 1). More than a quarter of FL patients had extended therapy, including 7% who had rituximab for more than 24 months. Among patients with other histologies, receipt of extended therapy varied from 20% (other indolent BCL) to 8% (BL). Compared with FL patients and controlling for demographic and disease characteristics, patients with other histologies were less likely to receive extended rituximab therapy (p<0.0001). Adjusted odds ratios were 0.91 (95% CI 0.78-1.05) for MCL, 0.83 (0.75-0.91) for other indolent BCL, 0.67 (0.60-0.75) for BCL-NOS, 0.32 (0.29-0.36) for DLBCL, and 0.28 (0.15-0.53) for BL. However, 75% of patients who had extended rituximab, and 63% of those who had rituximab >24 months, were of non-FL histology. Controlling for histology and other characteristics, extended rituximab therapy was more likely among women (adjusted OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18), and less likely among unmarried patients (0.92, 0.85-0.99) and those in rural areas (0.84, 0.75-0.94). There was significant regional variation (p<0.0001), with patients in the West (adjusted OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.95), and Midwest (0.75, 0.66-0.86) less likely to receive extended rituximab than those in the Northeast. There was no significant relationship between extended therapy and age, race, or comorbidity. Conclusions: While FL patients were more likely than others to receive extended rituximab, the majority of patients receiving extended rituximab had other diagnoses across the entire spectrum of B-cell lymphoma, for which extended rituximab is neither indicated nor supported by guidelines or prospective data. After controlling for histology, several demographic characteristics significantly influenced the duration of therapy. Extended use of rituximab – particularly in patients for whom it is not clearly indicated – may have important implications for clinical outcomes, toxicity, and costs. Table 1 Duration of rituximab use across B-cell lymphoma histologic subgroups Histology Duration of Rituximab N ≤7 mos >7-24 mos >24 mos DLBCL 10,567 91% 7% 2% FL 5,001 76% 17% 7% BL 127 92% 6% 2% MCL 1,339 79% 16% 5% Other indolent 4,095 80% 15% 5% BCL NOS 3,103 83% 13% 4% Total 24,232 80% 15% 5% Disclosures Matasar: Merck: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Spectrum: Honoraria. Nabhan:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8054-8054 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Straus ◽  
Paul A. Hamlin ◽  
Matthew J. Matasar ◽  
Maria Lia Palomba ◽  
Pamela Drullinsky ◽  
...  

8054 Background: Standard treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL in elderly patients who are not candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation (auSCT) has not been established. Cyclophosphamide (C), etoposide (E), prednisone (P) and procarbazine (CEPP) has been used by many clinicians based on limited data (Blood 76: 1293-98, 1990). Vorinostat (V) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that is approved for relapsed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and has activity in B-cell lymphomas. This trial defined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of V added to standard therapy and determined the response rate of this combination. Methods: Patients ≥age 60 with relapsed/refractory DLBCL not candidates for auSCT were enrolled on R-CVEP (R 375mg/m2 IV, d1; C 600mg/m2 d1 and 8, E 70mg/m2 IV d1, 140mg/m2 d2 and 3; V PO and Pred 60mg/m2 PO d1-10) every 28 days for 6 cycles. In the phase I component V was administered at doses of 300mg/d or 400mg/d for 10 days. The phase I was a 3 + 3 design and the phase II a two stage design requiring 8/20 complete responses (CR) for expansion. Assessment of response utilized end-of-treatment positron emission tomography (PET) (JCO 25: 579-86, 2007). Quality of life (QOL) was measured with the FACT-Lym v.4. Results: 27 pts. were enrolled. 1 died before treatment. For 26 pts: median age 76 yrs. (69-88), 14 females and 12 males, baseline PS (ECOG) 1 (0-2). Median follow-up for survivors: 9.2 mo. Phase I: 6 pts. at 300mg/d (no dose-limiting toxicity-DLT), 6 pts. at 400mg/d (2 grade 3 neutropenia = DLT). MTD 300mg/d x 10d. For 20 pts. at V 300mg/m2 (6 phase I + 14 phase II): 2 off study for toxicity, 1 withdrew consent, 6 CR (30%), 5 partial response (PR) (25%), 6 progressed (30%). Phenotypic overall responses (OR): germinal center (GC) 4/8 (2 CR), non-GC 6/10 (3 CR), transformed CLL 1/2 (1 CR). Median progression-free survival: 10 mo. QOL results will be presented. Conclusions: OR rate for V added to conventional chemotherapy and R was 55% (CR 30%, PR 25%) in relapsed/refractory DLBCL in elderly pts. not candidates for auSCT. This could provide a baseline for comparison with future clinical trials in this understudied population.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5499-5499
Author(s):  
David S. Ritchie ◽  
John F. Seymour ◽  
Sarah Thompson ◽  
Michael McManus ◽  
Miles Prince

Abstract Introduction: AuSCT using conditioning such as BEAM, for relapsed DLBCL and HL results in progression-free survival (PFS) of 60% of cases in second complete remission (CR). Those who do not achieve a second CR or who have primary refractory disease have significantly reduced benefit from BEAM/AuSCT. Consequently, we have been offering dose intensified conditioning prior to AuSCT with the Stanford regimen using Etoposide 60mg/kg day-4, Cyclophosphamide 100mg/kg day-2 and either BCNU 15mg/kg day-6 or fractionated TBI 12Gy days-8 to -5 to patients with poor risk haematologic malignancy. Methods: We assessed the outcome of AuSCT in 46 patients with poor risk haematologic disease; DLBCL (n=16), HL (n=16), multiply relapsed indolent lymphoma (n=8) and aggressive “other” lymphomas (n=6) who received conditioning with either the BNCU (n=31) or TBI (n=15) protocols. Of the 32 patients with HL or DLBCL, 28 had previously failed to achieve a CR to salvage chemotherapy; PR (21/32) or induction failure/early progression (7/32). Results: There were no transplant-related deaths among the 32 HL or DLBCL patients. One case of fatal radiation pneumonitis occurred following consolidative radiotherapy 6 months post AuSCT. The PFS for the combined HL/DLBCL cohort was 65±9% at 12, and 61±9% at 24 months. The 24 month PFS by BCNU or TBI regimen was 63% and 57% respectively (p=0.56). The 24 month PFS for HL or DLBCL treated with either regimen was 54±13% and 68±12% respectively (P=0.34) Additional groups were too heterogeneous to statistically assess. 1 of 6 patients with aggressive “other” lymphoma maintained a durable remission (39 months) and 4/8 patients with indolent lymphoma have ongoing CR at 9 – 59 months follow up. Conclusions: Stanford TBI or BCNU conditioning prior to AuSCT are well-tolerated and result in substantial rates of PFS in patients with poor risk HL or DLBCL.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4480-4480
Author(s):  
Seah H. Lim ◽  
William V. Esler ◽  
Yana Zhang ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Phillip O. Periman ◽  
...  

Abstract Although autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) may benefit patients with relapsed or high risk non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), many patients still relapse and die of their disease. Most relapses occur during the first three years after transplant. In an attempt to reduce disease relapses, we have applied a maintenance regimen to patients after ASCT for B-cell NHL. In this regimen, all patients received low dose rituximab infusion (375 mg/m2 for one day only) every three months starting D+100 for a total of 2 years or until disease relapse. We reasoned that rituxan infusion given for only one day every three months may be sufficient to prevent disease relapse during this post-transplant period when any residual tumor bulk is likely low. Fifteen patients (eight men, seven women) with high-risk B-cell lymphoma have been treated. Their diagnoses: advanced mantle cell lymphoma in first complete remission (CR1) (8), refractory advanced marginal zone lymphoma (2), refractory follicular large cell lymphoma (1), high risk T-cell rich B-cell NHL in CR1 (1), Stage IV diffuse large cell lymphoma in CR1 (1) and relapsed B-cell NHL in CR2 (2). The median age was 59 years (range 38–72 years). CR was achieved using R-CHOP (10) or R-DHAP/R-ICE (5) and autologous hematopoietic stem cells were harvested during hematopoietic recovery from the last course of chemo-immunotherapy. With a median follow-up of 46 months (range 12–66) for the group and 47 months (range 16–66) for patients with advanced mantle cell lymphoma, the projected 5.5 years relapse-free survival for the group is 100% and the overall survival 80%. Two patients with mantle cell lymphoma died, one due to metastatic breast cancer and another a stroke at 40 and 41 months respectively. Unlike patients who underwent ASCT without rituximab, in whom B-cell recovery occurred between 3–6 months, we observed severe delays in the immunoglobulin recoveries in these patients (Figure 1). With a median immunoglobulin follow-up of 28 months (range 6–64), none of the fifteen patients showed normalization of total IgG. Two patients achieved a normalized total IgA and two a normalized total IgM. This hypogammaglobulinemia persists beyond the rituxan maintenance period. The median time to attainment of 75% normal level of immunoglobulin is 36 months for IgG, 48 months for IgA and not reached for IgM. The severe immunoglobulin deficiencies may be clinically relevant. Six of fifteen patients developed recurrent upper respiratory tract infection. No fatal infection was observed among any of the patients. Our results, therefore, suggest that low dose rituximab administration every three months after ASCT for high-risk B-cell lymphoma may prevent lymphoma relapse. However, this is associated with severe and prolonged delays in immunoglobulin recovery beyond the rituxan maintenance period. Careful monitoring of the immunoglobulin recovery and intervention as appropriate should be done routinely in these patients. Figure Figure


2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. e59-e60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seah H. Lim ◽  
Joseph M. Guileyardo ◽  
Robbie Graham ◽  
Lorna R. Strong ◽  
William V. Esler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document