Lung function trajectory in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease

2021 ◽  
pp. 2101396
Author(s):  
Justin M. Oldham ◽  
Cathryn T. Lee ◽  
Zhe Wu ◽  
Willis S. Bowman ◽  
Janelle Vu Pugashetti ◽  
...  

Proposed criteria for progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) have been linked to increased mortality risk, but lung function trajectory after satisfying individual criterion remains unknown. Because survival is rarely employed as the primary endpoint in therapeutic trials, identifying PF-ILD criteria that best predict subsequent change in forced vital capacity (FVC) could improve clinical trial design. A retrospective, multi-center longitudinal cohort analysis was performed in consecutive patients with fibrotic connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD), chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia at three US centers (test cohort) and one UK center (validation cohort). One-year change in FVC after satisfying proposed PF-ILD criteria was estimated using joint modeling. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine whether results varied across key subgroups. One thousand two hundred twenty-seven patients were included, with CTD-ILD predominating. Six of nine PF-ILD criteria were associated with differential one-year change in FVC, with radiologic progression of fibrosis, alone and in combination with other features, associated with the largest subsequent decline in FVC. Findings varied significantly by ILD subtype, with CTD-ILD demonstrating little change in FVC after satisfying most PF-ILD criteria, while other ILDs showed significantly larger changes. Findings did not vary after stratification by radiologic pattern or exposure to immunosuppressant therapy. Near-term change in FVC after satisfying proposed PF-ILD criteria was heterogeneous depending on the criterion assessed and was strongly influenced by ILD subtype. These findings may inform future clinical trial design and suggest ILD subtype should be taken into consideration when applying PF-ILD criteria.

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelli Farkas ◽  
Lilla Hanák ◽  
Alexandra Mikó ◽  
Judit Bajor ◽  
Patrícia Sarlós ◽  
...  

Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 1108-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina Hoa ◽  
Sasha Bernatsky ◽  
Russell J Steele ◽  
Murray Baron ◽  
Marie Hudson ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a leading cause of mortality in SSc. Little is known about the benefits of immunosuppressive drugs in mild ILD. Our aim was to determine whether use of CYC or MMF was associated with an improved ILD course in patients with normal or mildly impaired lung function. Methods A retrospective cohort of SSc subjects with ILD, disease duration below seven years and no exposure to CYC or MMF prior to the baseline visit was constructed from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group registry. Subjects were categorized as having mild ILD if baseline forced vital capacity (FVC % predicted) was >85%. The primary exposure was any use of CYC or MMF at the baseline visit. FVC at one year was compared between exposed and unexposed subjects, using multivariate linear regression. Results Out of 294 eligible SSc-ILD subjects, 116 met criteria for mild ILD. In this subgroup, mean (s.d.) disease duration was 3.7 (2.0) years. Thirteen (11.2%) subjects were exposed to CYC or MMF at baseline. The one-year FVC was higher in exposed subjects compared with unexposed subjects, by a difference of 8.49% (95% CI: 0.01–16.98%). None of the exposed subjects experienced clinically meaningful progression over two years, whereas 24.6% of unexposed subjects did. Conclusion In this real-world setting, CYC/MMF exposure at baseline was associated with higher FVC values and a lower risk of progression among subjects with mild ILD. These data suggest a window of opportunity to preserve lung function in SSc-ILD.


Pancreatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. S147-S148
Author(s):  
Bálint Erőss ◽  
Nelli Farkas ◽  
Lilla Hanák ◽  
Alexandra Mikó ◽  
Aron Vincze ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.V. Truxal ◽  
H. Fu ◽  
D.M. McCarty ◽  
K.A. McNally ◽  
K.L. Kunkler ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana L. Manera ◽  
Mahsa Dadar ◽  
D. Louis Collins ◽  
Simon Ducharme ◽  

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo objectively quantify how cerebral volume loss could assist with clinical diagnosis and clinical trial design in the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD).MethodsWe applied deformation-based morphometric analyses with robust registration to precisely quantify the magnitude and pattern of atrophy in patients with bvFTD as compared to cognitively normal controls (CNCs), to assess the progression of atrophy over one year follow up and to generate clinical trial sample size estimates to detect differences for the structures most sensitive to change. This study included 203 subjects - 70 bvFTD and 133 CNCs - with a total of 482 timepoints from the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuroimaging Initiative.ResultsDeformation based morphometry (DBM) revealed significant atrophy in the frontal lobes, insula, medial and anterior temporal regions bilaterally in bvFTD subjects compared to controls with outstanding subcortical involvement. We provide detailed information on regional changes per year. In both cross-sectional analysis and over a one-year follow-up period, ventricle expansion was the most prominent differentiator of bvFTD from controls and a sensitive marker of disease progression.ConclusionsAutomated measurement of ventricular expansion is a sensitive and reliable marker of disease progression in bvFTD to be used in clinical trials for potential disease modifying drugs, as well as possibly to implement in clinical practice. Ventricular expansion measured with DBM provides the lowest published estimated sample size for clinical trial design to detect significant differences over one and two years.


Author(s):  
Jessica J. Waninger ◽  
Michael D. Green ◽  
Catherine Cheze Le Rest ◽  
Benjamin Rosen ◽  
Issam El Naqa

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 560.3-561
Author(s):  
E. F. Vicente-Rabaneda ◽  
J. De la Macorra ◽  
J. P. Baldivieso ◽  
F. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez ◽  
A. García-Vadillo ◽  
...  

Background:Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a severe manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), linked to increased mortality. There is still no consensus on the best therapeutic strategy as there aren’t yet randomized controlled trials.Objectives:To analyze the available scientific evidence on the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods:A systematic search was carried out in PubMed until April 2020 following the PRISMA recommendations. Studies were selected according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) original research, including case series, case/control studies, cohort studies, and clinical trials; (2) population with RA and associated ILD, either monographically or together with other connective tissue diseases (CTD), provided that individualized data on patients with RA were provided; (3) patients treated with RTX; (4) objective and quantifiable results on the evolution of ILD after treatment with available data of FVC, DLCO and/or HRCT.Results:Of the 64 papers identified, 9 articles were selected. The studies showed great heterogeneity in design, both in the sample selection criteria and in the objectives of the analysis. Most were observational, retrospective (n = 6) or prospective (n = 2) studies, with only one open prospective experimental study. Those focused on RA predominated, but 3 of them also included patients with other CTDs. The mean age of the patients in the different studies ranged between 52 and 70 years, predominantly women. 40-79% had a history of smoking and were mostly positive for rheumatoid factor (83-100%) and anti-CCP (82-100%). The most frequent radiological patterns were NSIP, UIP and undefined. The outcome measures were diverse: changes in respiratory function tests (LTF) and HRCT, incidence of pulmonary dysfunction, mortality rates, effect on glucocorticoid deprivation, delay in inclusion in the lung transplant list and/or serious adverse events. The initiation of RTX was motivated by pulmonary and/or joint pathology, in patients with failure to other synthetic or biological DMARDs. A total of 393 treatment cycles were collected in 114 patients, with a mean of 3.45 cycles per patient. The RTX regimen was 2 infusions of 1g 2 weeks apart in all patients, except for 1 who received the lymphoma-like regimen. With regard to the efficacy of the treatment with RTX, improvement and especially stabilization of HRCT and LFT predominated, with numerically greater improvement for DLCO than for FVC. There was also a favorable trend in the evolution of patients treated with RTX compared to controls, although it did not reach statistical significance, and a lower risk of deterioration of lung function in patients treated with RTX versus those who had received other DMARDs. The mortality rate found at 5 years was lower than that previously described for the disease and half for the patients treated with RTX compared to those treated with anti-TNF. The adverse events described in the studies did not show additional safety alerts to those already described for RTX.Conclusion:RTX seems to be postulated as a promising therapy for patients with ILD associated with RA, showing a stabilizing effect on the lung function, with an acceptable safety profile. However, further research of higher methodological quality prospective studies is needed to confirm these favorable preliminary results.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Corradini ◽  
Maximilian Niyazi ◽  
Dirk Verellen ◽  
Vincenzo Valentini ◽  
Seán Walsh ◽  
...  

AbstractFuture radiation oncology encompasses a broad spectrum of topics ranging from modern clinical trial design to treatment and imaging technology and biology. In more detail, the application of hybrid MRI devices in modern image-guided radiotherapy; the emerging field of radiomics; the role of molecular imaging using positron emission tomography and its integration into clinical routine; radiation biology with its future perspectives, the role of molecular signatures in prognostic modelling; as well as special treatment modalities such as brachytherapy or proton beam therapy are areas of rapid development. More clinically, radiation oncology will certainly find an important role in the management of oligometastasis. The treatment spectrum will also be widened by the rational integration of modern systemic targeted or immune therapies into multimodal treatment strategies. All these developments will require a concise rethinking of clinical trial design. This article reviews the current status and the potential developments in the field of radiation oncology as discussed by a panel of European and international experts sharing their vision during the “X-Change” symposium, held in July 2019 in Munich (Germany).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document